Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT 5.5 Prompt 👇

viktoroddy's profile picture

Viktor Oddy

55,501 subscribers

26,749 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."
0:12

"...at least as good as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5."

Fireworks AI

66,502 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free
0:13

giving my gf access to claude Opus 4.8 who uses gpt free

DROID

190,210 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇
0:13

Claude Opus 4.7 + GPT Image 2 is scary good at creating animated websites. Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

99,304 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model
0:18

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

725,764 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude
0:13

Fable 5 vs Opus 4.8 on Arcads MCP Both videos generated with Arcads X Claude

Romain Torres

448,468 просмотров • 12 дней назад

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!
0:16

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

104,522 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode
0:11

Truco para gastar tu suscripción de 20$ de Claude Code con un único prompt. /model → Opus 4.8 /effort → ultracode

Brais Moure

111,991 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇
0:15

Claude 4.8 + 1 prompt and now anyone can achieve the same results. Prompt below 👇

Mark Lou

44,697 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8
0:17

POV: you are using Claude opus 4.8

Sahil

974,506 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.
0:18

Can Opus 4.8 design beautiful landing pages? Yes it can, but requires a ton of skills and prompts. It's a little worse than GPT 5.5.

Meng To

73,341 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.
0:13

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

450,454 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.
0:15

Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 are cooked already… Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

FHILY👑

34,304 просмотров • 19 дней назад

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.
0:15

We partnered with Harvey to post-train the state-of-the-art legal agent on their LAB benchmark. It surpasses Opus 4.8 Max and GPT-5.5 xhigh.

Applied Compute

25,646 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇
0:16

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Kimi K2.6 It's not even close. 3 months ago nobody believed open-source could beat Claude. Today it did. Full guide with Prompt 👇

Poonam Soni

32,348 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

IT'S SO OVER!!! Claude Opus 4.6 can one-shot anything. Prompt below 👇
0:13

IT'S SO OVER!!! Claude Opus 4.6 can one-shot anything. Prompt below 👇

Daniel Ch

1,086,571 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Google Stitch vs Claude Prompt 👇
0:12

Google Stitch vs Claude Prompt 👇

Viktor Oddy

1,000,837 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.
0:15

Sonnet 5 vs Opus 4.8 on another agentic video pipeline. Both generated a storyboard with GPT Images 2.0, then fed it into Seedance 2.0, all through Higgsfield MCP on Claude. Same quality, but each directed Seedance 2.0 completely differently.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

600,277 просмотров • 19 дней назад

3D Digital Agency Website Opus 4.8 + Claude Design → Build Want to recreate this design? ↓
0:16

3D Digital Agency Website Opus 4.8 + Claude Design → Build Want to recreate this design? ↓

Viktor Oddy

64,560 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Kimi K2.7 Code just made Kimi K2.6 painfully outdated we tested Kimi K2.7 Code against Kimi K2.6, GPT 5.5, and Claude Opus 4.8 across Lorenz attractors, solar systems, and water waves in our previous comparison, Kimi K2.6 struggles with physical motion, now K2.7 gave the most realistic rendering of water wave!
0:15

Kimi K2.7 Code just made Kimi K2.6 painfully outdated we tested Kimi K2.7 Code against Kimi K2.6, GPT 5.5, and Claude Opus 4.8 across Lorenz attractors, solar systems, and water waves in our previous comparison, Kimi K2.6 struggles with physical motion, now K2.7 gave the most realistic rendering of water wave!

GMI Cloud

87,136 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.
0:17

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 просмотров • 1 месяц назад