Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Claude Opus 5.5 drew every frame of this animation using JavaScript. It ends where it began. Built with Higgsfield.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

236,187 subscribers

30,505 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

ИскусствоНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Claude Opus 5.5 is a beast at 3D modeling. 5,112 separate objects in this Shinkansen, down to all 430 seats inside. Built in Blender with Higgsfield.
0:18

Claude Opus 5.5 is a beast at 3D modeling. 5,112 separate objects in this Shinkansen, down to all 430 seats inside. Built in Blender with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

128,088 просмотров • 2 дней назад

this guy vibe coded this entire motion gallery with opus 4.8 using ONE prompt claude opus 4.8 >>> gpt 5.5
0:17

this guy vibe coded this entire motion gallery with opus 4.8 using ONE prompt claude opus 4.8 >>> gpt 5.5

Om Patel

32,907 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. What a time to be building with Higgsfield.
0:15

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. What a time to be building with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

148,822 просмотров • 2 дней назад

From concept to playable prototype. Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra building a 3D game with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.
0:11

From concept to playable prototype. Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra building a 3D game with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

102,451 просмотров • 1 день назад

From sketch to home, built in 3D with Claude Opus 5.5 using Three.js + TSL. The architecture evolves through four stages: first lines, massing, detail, and finished home.
0:19

From sketch to home, built in 3D with Claude Opus 5.5 using Three.js + TSL. The architecture evolves through four stages: first lines, massing, detail, and finished home.

Techartist

146,795 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Claude Opus 4.6 is no joke 🫠 Just asked for a great F1 animation for Redbull using Claude Opus 4.6 on Capacity . Took like 3 minutes to get it.
0:15

Claude Opus 4.6 is no joke 🫠 Just asked for a great F1 animation for Redbull using Claude Opus 4.6 on Capacity . Took like 3 minutes to get it.

Samuel Rondot

315,472 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

omg…that i made this with Claude Opus 5.5 and Seedance 2.5 nobody is teaching you the actual workflow behind these AI realistic videos.. so here it is, full breakdown, every prompt included 👇
0:19

omg…that i made this with Claude Opus 5.5 and Seedance 2.5 nobody is teaching you the actual workflow behind these AI realistic videos.. so here it is, full breakdown, every prompt included 👇

Abdul Shakoor

229,645 просмотров • 1 день назад

Someone turned Higgsfield into a video editor. A Higgsfield creator vibe-coded it with a timeline, image and video models built in, a working audio engine, plus render and export. Apps like this are built and deployed through Claude + Higgsfield MCP.
0:18

Someone turned Higgsfield into a video editor. A Higgsfield creator vibe-coded it with a timeline, image and video models built in, a working audio engine, plus render and export. Apps like this are built and deployed through Claude + Higgsfield MCP.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

50,085 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:
0:10

Claude Fable 5 excels at scriptwriting. We just paired it with the Higgsfield MCP and the results are stunning. Here is a comparison with Opus 4.8:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

117,073 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

SOMEONE BUILT A PERSONAL AI DASHBOARD WITH CLAUDE DESIGN AND OPUS 4.7 AND IT FEELS LIKE A PERSONAL OS
0:16

SOMEONE BUILT A PERSONAL AI DASHBOARD WITH CLAUDE DESIGN AND OPUS 4.7 AND IT FEELS LIKE A PERSONAL OS

leopardracer

316,181 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Built this signup page with zero design tools just Claude + Higgsfield + my custom design SKILL.md. One shot.
0:12

Built this signup page with zero design tools just Claude + Higgsfield + my custom design SKILL.md. One shot.

Elaya

18,676 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

OPUS 5 + HIGGSFIELD ONE-SHOTTED A 2000s 3D PLATFORMER WITH 2026 GRAPHICS Lantern-carrying fox, rotting boardwalk over a jade swamp, a cave behind a waterfall. nobody modeled a thing. every frame was generated. this is where gamedev is heading. ( the exact prompt ↓)
0:15

OPUS 5 + HIGGSFIELD ONE-SHOTTED A 2000s 3D PLATFORMER WITH 2026 GRAPHICS Lantern-carrying fox, rotting boardwalk over a jade swamp, a cave behind a waterfall. nobody modeled a thing. every frame was generated. this is where gamedev is heading. ( the exact prompt ↓)

ZEUS⚡️

62,568 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.
0:17

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This is insane! 🤯 Just built a new skill in Claude Code using Opus 4.5. The skill uses Gemini 3 Pro (via API) for designing web pages. Look at what it generated from one simple prompt.
0:11

This is insane! 🤯 Just built a new skill in Claude Code using Opus 4.5. The skill uses Gemini 3 Pro (via API) for designing web pages. Look at what it generated from one simple prompt.

elvis

152,981 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Opus 5.5 quite literally k*lled GPT-6 Astra. I asked Opus 5.5 to build a world in Unreal Engine and fill it with AI agents (Opus, Astra, Sol, Grok). Higgsfield built the assets in Blender. I left my laptop open overnight. The build took over 20 hours. The agents had one instruction: build a working society, allocate roles to each other, and evolve. Then I woke up on them beating the sh*t out of each other. Seems the frontier paced itself. Last minutes of failed society captured below:
0:17

Opus 5.5 quite literally k*lled GPT-6 Astra. I asked Opus 5.5 to build a world in Unreal Engine and fill it with AI agents (Opus, Astra, Sol, Grok). Higgsfield built the assets in Blender. I left my laptop open overnight. The build took over 20 hours. The agents had one instruction: build a working society, allocate roles to each other, and evolve. Then I woke up on them beating the sh*t out of each other. Seems the frontier paced itself. Last minutes of failed society captured below:

🍯

46,795 просмотров • 1 день назад

Pixar spent years on scenes like this.. recreate this whole flight scene with just 3 prompts using Higgsfield AI 🧩 claude skill.. character sheet, creature sheet, video prompt. that's it. full workflow below 👇
0:15

Pixar spent years on scenes like this.. recreate this whole flight scene with just 3 prompts using Higgsfield AI 🧩 claude skill.. character sheet, creature sheet, video prompt. that's it. full workflow below 👇

Abdul Shakoor

28,946 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Built this using Higgsfield + Cursor Composer 2.5 + my custom landing-page-design-skill.md file. It reminds me that models don't matter. Skills do.
0:11

Built this using Higgsfield + Cursor Composer 2.5 + my custom landing-page-design-skill.md file. It reminds me that models don't matter. Skills do.

Elaya

484,592 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

One prompt. 6 frontier coding models. "Create a realistic fireworks show using HTML Canvas and JavaScript. No libraries." Some built a whole celebration. Others... lit a sparkler. The lineup: - GPT-5.3 Codex - Claude Opus 4.6 - Gemini 3.1 Pro - MiniMax M2.7 - GLM-5 - Kimi K2.5
0:14

One prompt. 6 frontier coding models. "Create a realistic fireworks show using HTML Canvas and JavaScript. No libraries." Some built a whole celebration. Others... lit a sparkler. The lineup: - GPT-5.3 Codex - Claude Opus 4.6 - Gemini 3.1 Pro - MiniMax M2.7 - GLM-5 - Kimi K2.5

stevibe

14,152 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:
0:11

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper

354,673 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

OPUS 5 + HIGGSFIELD ONE-SHOTTED A 1996 JUNGLE PLATFORMER WITH 2026 GRAPHICS Crested lizard tearing down a winding jungle trail, waterfall leaps and stepping-stone jumps, live lives + crystal HUD. not a single asset was hand-modeled. every frame was generated. this is where gamedev is heading. (the exact prompt ↓)
0:15

OPUS 5 + HIGGSFIELD ONE-SHOTTED A 1996 JUNGLE PLATFORMER WITH 2026 GRAPHICS Crested lizard tearing down a winding jungle trail, waterfall leaps and stepping-stone jumps, live lives + crystal HUD. not a single asset was hand-modeled. every frame was generated. this is where gamedev is heading. (the exact prompt ↓)

ZEUS⚡️

83,685 просмотров • 1 месяц назад