Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Claude Opus 5.5 is really good at spotting and fixing rendering errors. It uses Photoshop + DaVinci Resolve Fusion to clean up an AI-generated video in a few minutes - a process that used to take hours of manual work.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

239,332 subscribers

33,928 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 5

Фото профиля Bob

Bob7 дней назад

Great now we can scam people even more with fake videos. Either label it, have a watermark, or get banned

Фото профиля Debo

Debo7 дней назад

What was the process like?

Фото профиля SKIPDAY (Takan - a vibe launcher) 🇮🇩

SKIPDAY (Takan - a vibe launcher) 🇮🇩6 дней назад

how it's done? frame by frame?

Фото профиля Ryan

Ryan7 дней назад

this kind of workflow can save creators so much time.

Фото профиля Helmy Pad

Helmy Pad6 дней назад

Massive upgrade ⚡

Похожие видео

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code: "Opus 5.5 does in a day what used to take your team a month. Most people will keep using it wrong." In 12 minutes he explains why Opus 5.5 needs less prompting than any model before, and why your old detailed prompts now work against you. Watch it, then read the article below on how to prompt Opus 5.5 👇

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code: "Opus 5.5 does in a day what used to take your team a month. Most people will keep using it wrong." In 12 minutes he explains why Opus 5.5 needs less prompting than any model before, and why your old detailed prompts now work against you. Watch it, then read the article below on how to prompt Opus 5.5 👇

Rahul

143,392 просмотров • 3 дней назад

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 to make an animated video about a robot who realises he's stuck in an AI-generated world. I wanted to really push it: 12 worlds, 12 styles, from 8-bit to claymation to pencil sketch, you can really see how well this model has imagined all worlds. This is the best animated video you will see today made by Opus 5.5, I promise.

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 to make an animated video about a robot who realises he's stuck in an AI-generated world. I wanted to really push it: 12 worlds, 12 styles, from 8-bit to claymation to pencil sketch, you can really see how well this model has imagined all worlds. This is the best animated video you will see today made by Opus 5.5, I promise.

Pradeep Kapoor

64,113 просмотров • 5 дней назад

opus 5.5 had a change of heart. this new rap single uses samples: "Something Borrowed" 🔊 claude produced everything here using javascript. opus found the samples, chopped them up, used different models to separate stems, analyze the tracks, and finally composed them into an original track in ~4 hours

opus 5.5 had a change of heart. this new rap single uses samples: "Something Borrowed" 🔊 claude produced everything here using javascript. opus found the samples, chopped them up, used different models to separate stems, analyze the tracks, and finally composed them into an original track in ~4 hours

A.J.

64,708 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code: "Opus 5.5 does in a day what used to take your team a month. And still most people keep using it wrong." In 1 hour minutes he explains why latest Claude Code models needs less prompting and why your old detailed prompts work against you now. Watch it, then save the exact setup below 👇

Boris Cherny, creator of Claude Code: "Opus 5.5 does in a day what used to take your team a month. And still most people keep using it wrong." In 1 hour minutes he explains why latest Claude Code models needs less prompting and why your old detailed prompts work against you now. Watch it, then save the exact setup below 👇

darkzodchi

91,484 просмотров • 5 дней назад

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

This looks like a video of the Golden Gate Bridge, but it's actually entirely generated using code by Claude Opus 5.5. From my testing, I think Opus is just as good at building 3D scenes as Astra. 📌 Watch my latest video to see how Opus and Astra compare on this scene and more:

Peter Yang

77,711 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Asked opus 5.5 to make a video of openai solving Navier-Stokes. Very nice model, I still prefer Astra and 5.6 as my main drivers as I do a lot of research heavy work but 5.5 Opus is the first time since 4.7 that I want to heavily run Claude. It has great taste.

Asked opus 5.5 to make a video of openai solving Navier-Stokes. Very nice model, I still prefer Astra and 5.6 as my main drivers as I do a lot of research heavy work but 5.5 Opus is the first time since 4.7 that I want to heavily run Claude. It has great taste.

Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc

41,222 просмотров • 7 дней назад

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 to explain how a fusion reactor works by building one you can take apart in your browser. Drag the plasma from 15 million °C, the heat of the Sun's core, to 150 million and watch a city light up.

I asked Claude Opus 5.5 to explain how a fusion reactor works by building one you can take apart in your browser. Drag the plasma from 15 million °C, the heat of the Sun's core, to 150 million and watch a city light up.

Konstantin Saifoulline

33,593 просмотров • 2 дней назад

AGENT WARS We asked 5 top AI models to design, engineer and 3D print a bridge to with the goal of holding the most possible weight. 🇺🇸 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (High) 🇨🇳 Kimi: Kimi K3 (High) 🇺🇸 Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 (High) 🇺🇸 OpenAI: GPT 6 Astra (High) 🇺🇸 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 (High) Each bridge had specific parameters. It had to span 2 feet, use a maximum 500 grams of filament, and it had to be under 18 hours of printing time. We specified what type of weight and where we would place it on the bridge. The Score: • Claude Opus 5.5 held an estimated 130 lbs! It took 9 hours and 11 minutes to print 17 parts and used 441 grams of filament. • Meta Muse Spark 1.3 held 26.5 lbs. It took 13 hours and 12 minutes to print 49 parts and used 478 grams of filament. • OpenAI GPT-6 Astra held an estimated 17.5 lbs. It took 15 hours and 44 minutes to print 29 parts and used 442 grams of filament. • SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 did not finish. On assembly it could not stand up by itself. It took 12 hours and 22 minutes to print 29 parts and used 460 grams of filament. • Kimi K3 did not finish. It wasn’t engineered correctly so the bridge could not even be assembled. It took 11 hours and 19 minutes to print 35 parts and used 446 grams of filament. That means our champion for this episode is Claude Opus 5.5. Not only did it hold the most weight (by FAR) it also took the least time to print, used the least amount of parts and used the least amount of filament. This was episode 02 of Agent Wars, stay tuned for episode 03.

AGENT WARS We asked 5 top AI models to design, engineer and 3D print a bridge to with the goal of holding the most possible weight. 🇺🇸 Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (High) 🇨🇳 Kimi: Kimi K3 (High) 🇺🇸 Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 (High) 🇺🇸 OpenAI: GPT 6 Astra (High) 🇺🇸 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 (High) Each bridge had specific parameters. It had to span 2 feet, use a maximum 500 grams of filament, and it had to be under 18 hours of printing time. We specified what type of weight and where we would place it on the bridge. The Score: • Claude Opus 5.5 held an estimated 130 lbs! It took 9 hours and 11 minutes to print 17 parts and used 441 grams of filament. • Meta Muse Spark 1.3 held 26.5 lbs. It took 13 hours and 12 minutes to print 49 parts and used 478 grams of filament. • OpenAI GPT-6 Astra held an estimated 17.5 lbs. It took 15 hours and 44 minutes to print 29 parts and used 442 grams of filament. • SpaceXAI Grok 4.7 did not finish. On assembly it could not stand up by itself. It took 12 hours and 22 minutes to print 29 parts and used 460 grams of filament. • Kimi K3 did not finish. It wasn’t engineered correctly so the bridge could not even be assembled. It took 11 hours and 19 minutes to print 35 parts and used 446 grams of filament. That means our champion for this episode is Claude Opus 5.5. Not only did it hold the most weight (by FAR) it also took the least time to print, used the least amount of parts and used the least amount of filament. This was episode 02 of Agent Wars, stay tuned for episode 03.

Roberto Nickson

444,280 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Claude opus 5.5 ultracode edition i gave the fable output to opus said to make a launch video for itself where it helps people Claude ClaudeDevs Boris Cherny this is what claude is born to do helping people with their daily work you can play with it :

Claude opus 5.5 ultracode edition i gave the fable output to opus said to make a launch video for itself where it helps people Claude ClaudeDevs Boris Cherny this is what claude is born to do helping people with their daily work you can play with it :

Chetaslua

36,214 просмотров • 7 дней назад

this entire video is 100% AI generated and we fully automated the process it took me one message to Claude and 3 images from Nano Banana to generate a full edited video in just a few minutes - total cost was only ~$10 if you’re not using AI to get fk u rich rn you’re running out of time best time to be alive ngl

this entire video is 100% AI generated and we fully automated the process it took me one message to Claude and 3 images from Nano Banana to generate a full edited video in just a few minutes - total cost was only ~$10 if you’re not using AI to get fk u rich rn you’re running out of time best time to be alive ngl

MAX

38,413 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Seedance 2.0 created a Shinji and Asuka dance in just a few hours. What used to take years of work can now be done in only a few hours. Seedance 2.0 is cooking.

Seedance 2.0 created a Shinji and Asuka dance in just a few hours. What used to take years of work can now be done in only a few hours. Seedance 2.0 is cooking.

nachos2d

175,236 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I asked Opus 5.5 to make a game inspired by the discovery of the first computer, the Antikythera mechanism. Everything you see and hear is procedurally generated in real time, from code by Opus 5.5. It's a single 3 MB HTML file. Playable Claude artifact below.

I asked Opus 5.5 to make a game inspired by the discovery of the first computer, the Antikythera mechanism. Everything you see and hear is procedurally generated in real time, from code by Opus 5.5. It's a single 3 MB HTML file. Playable Claude artifact below.

edwin

388,732 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Manual QA is dead Engineers used to wait hours, sometimes days, for QA to green-light a single change. That loop is collapsing with agents. Verify in minutes, fix in minutes, and ship with confidence at the speed of inference.

Manual QA is dead Engineers used to wait hours, sometimes days, for QA to green-light a single change. That loop is collapsing with agents. Verify in minutes, fix in minutes, and ship with confidence at the speed of inference.

hayden

19,717 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Someone used Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make a full animated short film called "What is the purpose of life?" from a single one-shot prompt in about 1 hour 20 minutes, spending just $3.21 on OpenRouter APIs. → Opus orchestrated 8 different OpenRouter APIs, with most of the $3.21 going to Nano Banana 2 images and text to voice → The Opus side cost about $20 in API terms, or roughly 10% of one 5-hour quota on a Max plan → Posted as a true one-shot with no edits, and the creator says a few things still need fixing → The full prompt is shared in the post so anyone can rerun it in Claude Code Reddit link:

Someone used Claude Code with Opus 5.5 to make a full animated short film called "What is the purpose of life?" from a single one-shot prompt in about 1 hour 20 minutes, spending just $3.21 on OpenRouter APIs. → Opus orchestrated 8 different OpenRouter APIs, with most of the $3.21 going to Nano Banana 2 images and text to voice → The Opus side cost about $20 in API terms, or roughly 10% of one 5-hour quota on a Max plan → Posted as a true one-shot with no edits, and the creator says a few things still need fixing → The full prompt is shared in the post so anyone can rerun it in Claude Code Reddit link:

0xMarioNawfal

70,622 просмотров • 6 дней назад

Most AI video tools still feel like traditional editors with a few AI features added in. You still end up adjusting timelines, fixing frames, and spending time editing. But Hailuo AI felt different to me. I gave it a simple prompt and one image, and it generated a full video on its own. No complicated workflow, no manual editing just idea to video in minutes. The text-to-video results are surprisingly good, image-to-video transitions look smooth, and the overall output feels cinematic. What I liked most is the speed. You can quickly test ideas without getting stuck in editing. Try it here: #Hailuo

Most AI video tools still feel like traditional editors with a few AI features added in. You still end up adjusting timelines, fixing frames, and spending time editing. But Hailuo AI felt different to me. I gave it a simple prompt and one image, and it generated a full video on its own. No complicated workflow, no manual editing just idea to video in minutes. The text-to-video results are surprisingly good, image-to-video transitions look smooth, and the overall output feels cinematic. What I liked most is the speed. You can quickly test ideas without getting stuck in editing. Try it here: #Hailuo

Markandey Sharma

32,326 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Claude can handle the research and thinking. Templafy takes it from there. Instead of copying AI output into a company template and spending time fixing layouts, Templafy uses your approved templates, brand rules, and content to create a real, editable PowerPoint. That makes the jump from AI-generated ideas to a business-ready deck much easier. Add Templafy to Claude:

Manish Kumar Shah

33,179 просмотров • 12 дней назад

It’s actually over. Seedance 2.0 is the most advanced video AI in the world. It can generate cinematic, Hollywood-level CGI scenes in minutes—something that used to take massive teams, months of work, and millions of dollars. What once cost a fortune now costs just a few dollars.

It’s actually over. Seedance 2.0 is the most advanced video AI in the world. It can generate cinematic, Hollywood-level CGI scenes in minutes—something that used to take massive teams, months of work, and millions of dollars. What once cost a fortune now costs just a few dollars.

nachos2d

20,877 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I gave OPUS 5.5 Access to: - Uni 1.1 for image generation - Seedance 2.5 - Davinci Resolve Studio for Grade and editing I also gave it a Suno track I had already made. It made this entire video 🤯 More below 🧵

I gave OPUS 5.5 Access to: - Uni 1.1 for image generation - Seedance 2.5 - Davinci Resolve Studio for Grade and editing I also gave it a Suno track I had already made. It made this entire video 🤯 More below 🧵

A.I.Warper

37,883 просмотров • 1 день назад

You can ask Opus 5.5 to write extreme music theory wankery and it will do it in javascript. Theory-porn as a genre? everything you see and hear is generated from javascript code that claude wrote. no samples, no libraries 🔊

You can ask Opus 5.5 to write extreme music theory wankery and it will do it in javascript. Theory-porn as a genre? everything you see and hear is generated from javascript code that claude wrote. no samples, no libraries 🔊

dadabots

42,154 просмотров • 6 дней назад

“Imagine there exists a really good movie about you. Animate the opening credits to this film with made-up names in any style you like. Return the sequence as an mp4.” Claude Opus 5.5 (Extra)

“Imagine there exists a really good movie about you. Animate the opening credits to this film with made-up names in any style you like. Return the sequence as an mp4.” Claude Opus 5.5 (Extra)

Riley Goodside

58,023 просмотров • 6 дней назад