正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨Claude Opus 5.5 VS GPT 6.1 Sol. i gave both models the same simple prompt: create an animated website from a single image. Opus took around 1hr 20mins, while GPT-6.1 finished in just 15mins. both came up with really nice concepts, but Opus clearly spent more time on the... show more

m0h

26,317 subscribers

23,104 次观看 • 8 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

37 条评论

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

coconut button website by claude opus 5.5:

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

off-duty website by GPT 6.1 sol:

mazino.patron 的头像

mazino.patron8 天前

Claude did it much better of course

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

yes yes ofcourse

kepo 的头像

kepo8 天前

also cooked something interesting today

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

nice!!!

Alexandr Merk 的头像

Alexandr Merk8 天前

Love these side-by-side tests. Did you compare code quality too, or just the visual result?

Avid 的头像

Avid8 天前

moh you are awesome at this

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

I’ve been enjoying my time with this models

EnzoXbt 的头像

EnzoXbt7 天前

same prompt, two very different tradeoffs — speed vs execution is the real comparison here

m0h 的头像

m0h7 天前

btw the prompt was vague, and I gave both models access to higgsfield MCP. for the animation.

EnzoXbt 的头像

EnzoXbt7 天前

its good job

Akash Basak 的头像

Akash Basak7 天前

Prompt please

amXBT 的头像

amXBT8 天前

nice for e-commerce

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

yeah yeah, I think I might start selling em website lol

Minh Danh Ngo 的头像

Minh Danh Ngo7 天前

Speed versus polish gets interesting.

Knowix 的头像

Knowix8 天前

I’m actually impressed at Sol performance here, I might have to start using it a lot more

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

I’m genuinely surprised that y’all are impressed with sol performance.

Obs | Cure 的头像

Obs | Cure8 天前

opus details still edging out gpt speed tho

Zerionia | Weird Tech 的头像

Zerionia | Weird Tech6 天前

Would love a round two with the same time budget. Give the fast one the remaining hour to iterate, then compare mobile layout, keyboard navigation and animation smoothness. First draft speed vs finished-site quality is a much more interesting fight.

Brjan | AI Builder 的头像

Brjan | AI Builder7 天前

Opus taking over an hour for a similar task shows it's not just about speed

An Xuan 的头像

An Xuan8 天前

Same prompt 3 times on Opus 5.5 and I got the same cream page 3 times. It has a favorite

Mostafa Gamal Bisher 的头像

Mostafa Gamal Bisher7 天前

Either way is a nice work really

Haleemah 的头像

Haleemah8 天前

They both looks so good

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

yes they both delivered but, I like opus 5.5 delivery more. the animation feel is superior

kethan Goparapu 的头像

kethan Goparapu7 天前

All you have to worry about Claude is the time, but with GPT you have to worry about the quality and the usage.

huehue 的头像

huehue8 天前

Sol cannot slide / hroziontal slider when at clothes part in mobile

DARKER 的头像

DARKER7 天前

Opus5.5 No.1

Upside 的头像

Upside7 天前

How much was the total cost for each?

painn 的头像

painn7 天前

this is really good bro

m0h 的头像

m0h7 天前

yes sir

cortexch 的头像

cortexch8 天前

what effort level was opus on? 1hr 20 for one page sounds like max. on medium it might close that gap

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

it was on high, just high

Zerionia | Weird Tech 的头像

Zerionia | Weird Tech6 天前

Would love a round two with the same time budget. Give the fast one the remaining hour to iterate, then compare mobile layout, keyboard navigation and animation smoothness. First draft speed vs finished-site quality is a much more interesting fight.

J A Z I I 的头像

J A Z I I8 天前

wait sol did way better too not same slop UI

m0h 的头像

m0h8 天前

yeah sol did tried this time, it was on extra high level. and it deliver in just 15mins

Ivan 的头像

Ivan7 天前

15 mins vs 1h20 is a huge gap for results this close

相关视频

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol. I gave all four the same one-line prompt: recreate Sonic in Three.js. No reference image. No follow-ups. Just one prompt. Who wins?

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. Sonnet 5.5 vs. GPT-6.1 Sol. I gave all four the same one-line prompt: recreate Sonic in Three.js. No reference image. No follow-ups. Just one prompt. Who wins?

Luckey Faraday

92,037 次观看 • 6 天前

My vid on Opus 5.5 and GPT 6.1 Sol: - Sol 6.1 is miles better than 6.0, it's worth trying out & the price is nuts - Opus 5.5 is the best Claude model in a very long time

My vid on Opus 5.5 and GPT 6.1 Sol: - Sol 6.1 is miles better than 6.0, it's worth trying out & the price is nuts - Opus 5.5 is the best Claude model in a very long time

Ben Davis

20,050 次观看 • 11 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol This time, I prefer GPT-6.1 Sol - Super Mario style game, but the player is the Claude logo and the coins are tokens. Wait till the end. :)

Poonam Soni

16,138 次观看 • 1 天前

GPT Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5. Which AI understands 3D best? I gave all four the exact same task: build an AK-47 from scratch. Same prompt. Same environment. Which one wins?

GPT Astra vs GPT-6.1 Sol vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Opus 5.5. Which AI understands 3D best? I gave all four the exact same task: build an AK-47 from scratch. Same prompt. Same environment. Which one wins?

Luckey Faraday

67,786 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨 GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Same high effort. Subway Surfers clone in Three.js - both had to build and test. Sol(Left) took : 12 min / 7.32M tokens Opus(right) took : 39 min / 5.6M tokens Sol was 3x faster. Opus used ~23% fewer tokens. Which one are you picking?

🚨 GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Same high effort. Subway Surfers clone in Three.js - both had to build and test. Sol(Left) took : 12 min / 7.32M tokens Opus(right) took : 39 min / 5.6M tokens Sol was 3x faster. Opus used ~23% fewer tokens. Which one are you picking?

Rajath Gowda

10,763 次观看 • 11 天前

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

179,252 次观看 • 19 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Bridgebench

55,327 次观看 • 21 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. From a single prompt: “Build the highest-quality playable PUBG you can.” I went to sleep. When I woke up, both had built a fully playable game🤯 Opus worked for 10 hours end to end, while Astra took just 3.

Emm | scenario.com

58,854 次观看 • 21 天前

Same prompt. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Opus 5. All in Three.js. Opus produced the better raw visuals. The ocean, waves and atmosphere look noticeably richer. But it also: → cost ~10x more → took much longer → needed an extra prompt just to fix the camera controls Sol got surprisingly close on the first attempt, much faster and far cheaper. Opus wins visual fidelity. Sol wins the actual engineering test.

Same prompt. GPT-5.6 Sol vs Opus 5. All in Three.js. Opus produced the better raw visuals. The ocean, waves and atmosphere look noticeably richer. But it also: → cost ~10x more → took much longer → needed an extra prompt just to fix the camera controls Sol got surprisingly close on the first attempt, much faster and far cheaper. Opus wins visual fidelity. Sol wins the actual engineering test.

Token Gremlin

12,914 次观看 • 1 个月前

Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Astra vs 6.1 Sol (Mario Kart test) All on the same prompt Sonnet used over 2x as many tokens as Opus in the same amount of time and imo looks the best of all four

Opus 5.5 vs Sonnet 5.5 vs Astra vs 6.1 Sol (Mario Kart test) All on the same prompt Sonnet used over 2x as many tokens as Opus in the same amount of time and imo looks the best of all four

Lumina

61,680 次观看 • 2 天前

🚨 Muse Wonder VS Claude Opus 5.5 meta claims Muse Wonder outperforms models like Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1, so i decided to put that claim to the test. i gave Muse Wonder and Opus 5.5 the exact same prompt: build an animated Popeye website from scratch. and here are the final results from both models. which one won?

🚨 Muse Wonder VS Claude Opus 5.5 meta claims Muse Wonder outperforms models like Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1, so i decided to put that claim to the test. i gave Muse Wonder and Opus 5.5 the exact same prompt: build an animated Popeye website from scratch. and here are the final results from both models. which one won?

m0h

60,048 次观看 • 1 天前

Something is wrong at OpenAI. Tibo and Sam said GPT-6.1 Sol would be faster today. Instead it appears to be running slower. Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 are much faster than Sol 6.1 and Grok 4.7 Check out the below comparison, same prompt on high reasoning with a 20 minute deadline.

Something is wrong at OpenAI. Tibo and Sam said GPT-6.1 Sol would be faster today. Instead it appears to be running slower. Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 are much faster than Sol 6.1 and Grok 4.7 Check out the below comparison, same prompt on high reasoning with a 20 minute deadline.

Eco

17,812 次观看 • 12 天前

Benchmarks will tell you GPT-6.1 Sol is the cheapest model by far. If you are on a subscription this is not the case. Sonnet 5.5 is currently the leader for the most usage on a $20 plan from my tests. Sol 6.1 is closely behind Sonnet 5.5 followed by Opus 5.5 and Astra 6. Usage is now great in Sol 6.1 but Sonnet 5.5 is still the leader

Benchmarks will tell you GPT-6.1 Sol is the cheapest model by far. If you are on a subscription this is not the case. Sonnet 5.5 is currently the leader for the most usage on a $20 plan from my tests. Sol 6.1 is closely behind Sonnet 5.5 followed by Opus 5.5 and Astra 6. Usage is now great in Sol 6.1 but Sonnet 5.5 is still the leader

Eco

38,070 次观看 • 14 天前

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

Opus 5.5 vs GPT 6 astra tested both with the same prompt at their highest reasoning settings, using the same devin harness: > opus took 2 hours 10 mins and cost $75 > astra took 1 hour 25 mins and cost $61 opus 5.5 attention to details is on point, it took time to make everything perfect as i wanted but still super slow and ended up costing way more then astra which one did better here?

J A Z I I

55,525 次观看 • 21 天前

Mistral just shipped Large 4, its biggest model ever. So I gave the same 3D prompt to 8 models. One shot, no fixes. Open: Mistral Large 4, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4 Pro Closed: Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol Results below 👇

Mistral just shipped Large 4, its biggest model ever. So I gave the same 3D prompt to 8 models. One shot, no fixes. Open: Mistral Large 4, Kimi K3, GLM 5.3, DeepSeek V4 Pro Closed: Claude Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6.1 Sol Results below 👇

Dominique Silvestre

44,765 次观看 • 7 天前

Same prompt to both: "make a jelly koi pond." Claude Opus 5.5 built a full gummy aquarium for $12.38. GPT-6 Astra gave the fish an earthquake. Who did it better?

Same prompt to both: "make a jelly koi pond." Claude Opus 5.5 built a full gummy aquarium for $12.38. GPT-6 Astra gave the fish an earthquake. Who did it better?

0xMarioNawfal

46,545 次观看 • 3 天前

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

167,004 次观看 • 20 天前

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Opus 5.5. Half the standard input/output token price. I built a paper-train adventure: broken tracks, folding landscapes, and a seed that brings a city to life. Two routes. One mission. Both versions rendered with Minimax.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Opus 5.5. Half the standard input/output token price. I built a paper-train adventure: broken tracks, folding landscapes, and a seed that brings a city to life. Two routes. One mission. Both versions rendered with Minimax.

Lee Lin | AI

57,050 次观看 • 14 天前

Crazy. Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 on 3d modeling at 2/3 the price We tested Opus 5, Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol on the same prompt: build an explorable Japanese suburban street in Three.js, full 3D, rendered like a hand-drawn anime background. All on Max effort. Opus 5 took the longest but delivered the most varied scenery: clean dark outlines, flat cel-shaded color bands, dense street details down to the vending machine signage. Fable paid more attention to details, and while GPT 5.6 Sol was 3-4x cheaper and the fastest, but the render shows it: sparse, washed out, barely styled. Opus 5: 1hr 21min · $26.7 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $35 GPT 5.6 Sol: 41min · $7.1

Crazy. Opus 5 outperformed Fable 5 on 3d modeling at 2/3 the price We tested Opus 5, Fable 5, and GPT 5.6 Sol on the same prompt: build an explorable Japanese suburban street in Three.js, full 3D, rendered like a hand-drawn anime background. All on Max effort. Opus 5 took the longest but delivered the most varied scenery: clean dark outlines, flat cel-shaded color bands, dense street details down to the vending machine signage. Fable paid more attention to details, and while GPT 5.6 Sol was 3-4x cheaper and the fastest, but the render shows it: sparse, washed out, barely styled. Opus 5: 1hr 21min · $26.7 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $35 GPT 5.6 Sol: 41min · $7.1

GMI Cloud

54,140 次观看 • 2 个月前

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Tony

112,633 次观看 • 19 天前