Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in flight simulator development. Realistic flight simulation, made with Higgsfield.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

238,517 subscribers

27,864 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Neatprompts
Neatprompts4 дней назад

What a time to be alive, it used to take weeks to create something like this pre AI

Фото профиля haydar
haydar4 дней назад

gpt opened the file, opus closed it

Фото профиля Digvijay
Digvijay4 дней назад

Damn the water looks so gud in 5.5.. it's a beast

Фото профиля Love Web3 World
Love Web3 World4 дней назад

Look at this short 3D story build by Opus 5.5 and blender.

Фото профиля S Pheermohammed
S Pheermohammed4 дней назад

Based, AI may crunch numbers but it’ll never feel the roar of a real engine, so keep the sims and leave the real sky to the troops. 🤔

Фото профиля m
m4 дней назад

this is literally not true

Фото профиля haydar
haydar4 дней назад

opus brought the whole package, gpt stopped at the concept

Похожие видео

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.
0:44

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

522,912 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.
0:36

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

66,037 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in product launch motion design. Made in one shot with Higgsfield.
0:24

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in product launch motion design. Made in one shot with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

19,537 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.
0:27

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

1,101,276 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Dario Amoredei and Sam Altman cooking with GPT 6 SOL and Claude Opus 5.5
0:27

Dario Amoredei and Sam Altman cooking with GPT 6 SOL and Claude Opus 5.5

alex

76,130 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.
0:32

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

171,700 просмотров • 3 дней назад

GPT-6 Sol & Opus 5.5 + Unreal + Blender
0:25

GPT-6 Sol & Opus 5.5 + Unreal + Blender

Quadcode AI

215,542 просмотров • 1 день назад

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.
0:41

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

2,824,752 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Higgsfield Supercomputer chains GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Seedance, Veo & Kling into ONE cinematic pipeline. Automatically 🤯
1:02

Higgsfield Supercomputer chains GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Seedance, Veo & Kling into ONE cinematic pipeline. Automatically 🤯

Alvaro Cintas

54,096 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.
0:30

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

164,011 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"
0:38

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"

Seve

320,923 просмотров • 5 дней назад

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
0:40

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

54,948 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Made with Claude Opus 5.5
0:31

Made with Claude Opus 5.5

DreW

1,790,766 просмотров • 5 дней назад

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.
0:30

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

33,684 просмотров • 5 дней назад

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.
1:10

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.

Shimecki

175,646 просмотров • 5 дней назад

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.
1:00

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

BridgeMind

61,201 просмотров • 2 дней назад

pt.2 of made with Claude Opus 5.5
0:31

pt.2 of made with Claude Opus 5.5

DreW

36,008 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.
0:27

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

AI/ML API

378,025 просмотров • 2 дней назад

GPT-6 Astra Pro made an airplane landing simulator in 30 minutes - accurate dimensions, real physics, landing gear based on actual specs. One prompt. No engineers. Microsoft Flight Simulator took years.
0:40

GPT-6 Astra Pro made an airplane landing simulator in 30 minutes - accurate dimensions, real physics, landing gear based on actual specs. One prompt. No engineers. Microsoft Flight Simulator took years.

0xMarioNawfal

61,668 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.
0:32

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.

Mirage

204,261 просмотров • 5 дней назад