正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in flight simulator development. Realistic flight simulation, made with Higgsfield.

higgsfield_ai's profile picture

Higgsfield AI 🧩

238,517 subscribers

27,864 次观看 • 4 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

7 条评论

Neatprompts 的头像
Neatprompts4 天前

What a time to be alive, it used to take weeks to create something like this pre AI

haydar 的头像
haydar4 天前

gpt opened the file, opus closed it

Digvijay 的头像
Digvijay4 天前

Damn the water looks so gud in 5.5.. it's a beast

Love Web3 World 的头像
Love Web3 World4 天前

Look at this short 3D story build by Opus 5.5 and blender.

S Pheermohammed 的头像
S Pheermohammed4 天前

Based, AI may crunch numbers but it’ll never feel the roar of a real engine, so keep the sims and leave the real sky to the troops. 🤔

m 的头像
m4 天前

this is literally not true

haydar 的头像
haydar4 天前

opus brought the whole package, gpt stopped at the concept

相关视频

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.
0:44

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

522,912 次观看 • 5 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.
0:36

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

66,037 次观看 • 5 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in product launch motion design. Made in one shot with Higgsfield.
0:24

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in product launch motion design. Made in one shot with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

19,537 次观看 • 5 天前

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.
0:27

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

1,101,276 次观看 • 5 天前

Dario Amoredei and Sam Altman cooking with GPT 6 SOL and Claude Opus 5.5
0:27

Dario Amoredei and Sam Altman cooking with GPT 6 SOL and Claude Opus 5.5

alex

76,518 次观看 • 5 天前

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.
0:32

Opus 5.5 killed the game. We had it and GPT-6 Sol both draw Dario in Canva with ego (lite). Claude Opus 5.5: 1h 23m, $6.31 GPT-6 Sol: 26m, $14.97 Opus took 3x longer, cost less than half, and drew a much better Dario.

ego

171,700 次观看 • 3 天前

GPT-6 Sol & Opus 5.5 + Unreal + Blender
0:25

GPT-6 Sol & Opus 5.5 + Unreal + Blender

Quadcode AI

215,542 次观看 • 1 天前

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.
0:41

Introducing Higgsfield x Claude Opus 5.5. Anthropic’s newest model, which is 40% cheaper and over 30% faster than Opus 5, is live on Higgsfield. Pair Opus 5.5 with the Higgsfield MCP and turn your most ambitious ideas into complete products. Available on Claude via Higgsfield MCP and in Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

2,824,752 次观看 • 5 天前

Higgsfield Supercomputer chains GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Seedance, Veo & Kling into ONE cinematic pipeline. Automatically 🤯
1:02

Higgsfield Supercomputer chains GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7, Seedance, Veo & Kling into ONE cinematic pipeline. Automatically 🤯

Alvaro Cintas

54,096 次观看 • 4 个月前

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.
0:30

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

164,011 次观看 • 4 天前

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"
0:38

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"

Seve

320,923 次观看 • 5 天前

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
0:40

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

54,948 次观看 • 21 天前

Made with Claude Opus 5.5
0:31

Made with Claude Opus 5.5

DreW

1,790,766 次观看 • 5 天前

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.
0:30

The team behind AI/ML API tested the new Claude Opus 5.5 against GPT-6 Sol. These tests involved generating a set of one-shot 3D scene prompts, starting with an "animated fish school." Across four scenes, Opus 5.5 produced more detailed renders at a total cost of $4.37, while GPT-6 Sol came in at $0.34, according to their results.

🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog

33,684 次观看 • 5 天前

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.
1:10

You gotta be kidding me!?! Left: GPT-6 Sol Right: Opus 5.5 Same prompt. Not even the same universe! Opus 5.5 CRUSHES it with the level of detail.

Shimecki

175,646 次观看 • 5 天前

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.
1:00

GPT 6 Astra made this video entirely with code. Same prompt that I used for the Claude Opus 5.5 video. Anthropic is so far ahead right now.

BridgeMind

61,201 次观看 • 2 天前

pt.2 of made with Claude Opus 5.5
0:31

pt.2 of made with Claude Opus 5.5

DreW

36,008 次观看 • 4 天前

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.
0:27

Opus 5.5 beats Jev and GPT-6 Sol in 3 moves: Rubik’s Cube race We made 4 models run with same limits for all: 20 moves or 5 minutes. Every move = 1 API call. Results: Opus 5.5: solved in 1m 12.87s with the perfect 3 moves GPT-6 Sol: wrong first move, out of time after 4 moves Jev: 20 moves in 20 seconds, ran out of moves Laya: 20 moves in 9.5s, ran out of moves Opus, GPT, and Jev ran via Laya ran locally.

AI/ML API

378,025 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT-6 Astra Pro made an airplane landing simulator in 30 minutes - accurate dimensions, real physics, landing gear based on actual specs. One prompt. No engineers. Microsoft Flight Simulator took years.
0:40

GPT-6 Astra Pro made an airplane landing simulator in 30 minutes - accurate dimensions, real physics, landing gear based on actual specs. One prompt. No engineers. Microsoft Flight Simulator took years.

0xMarioNawfal

61,668 次观看 • 20 天前

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.
0:32

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.

Mirage

204,261 次观看 • 5 天前