Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Clavicular explains why LOOKSMAXXING going mainstream will erase the “middle class” of looks 😳 “As lookism goes mainstream, it’s going to erase the middle class of looks. Rich and genetically blessed people will keep ascending, while everyone else gets pushed further down.” “I mean, that's just obvious, right? So... the more mainstream looksmaxxing goes, and the more people that participate, yeah, it's going to make the percentiles more brutal... so you're going to see more good looking people, and it's going to be something that's pay-to-win.” “You know, like you said, with surgeries, with different procedures like Botox, this just isn't something that poor people are going to have access to and typically, wealth and looks are semi-correlated, so yeah, you're absolutely right.” His advice? Max your looks now — before it’s too late 💯show more

midaqih

14,334 subscribers

40,524 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика Здоровье и велнес

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Clavicular explains why the middle class is now in danger from looksmaxxers “The more mainstream looksmaxxing becomes, the more you’ll see attractive people who are essentially pay-to-win through procedures and poor men simply can’t compete.”

Clavicular explains why the middle class is now in danger from looksmaxxers “The more mainstream looksmaxxing becomes, the more you’ll see attractive people who are essentially pay-to-win through procedures and poor men simply can’t compete.”

veizau

12,038 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

.Cory Booker: "Are we a nation that is going to tolerate this, or a nation that's going to stand up? As the great Frederick Douglass said, 'the limits of tyrants are prescribed by the people that they seek to oppress.' How much will we endure before we say enough is enough? I am going to give more. I'm going to march more. I'm going to speak out more. I'm going to stand up more. That's the test that we're in right now. It's a moral moment. How will you respond?"

.Cory Booker: "Are we a nation that is going to tolerate this, or a nation that's going to stand up? As the great Frederick Douglass said, 'the limits of tyrants are prescribed by the people that they seek to oppress.' How much will we endure before we say enough is enough? I am going to give more. I'm going to march more. I'm going to speak out more. I'm going to stand up more. That's the test that we're in right now. It's a moral moment. How will you respond?"

Brian Tyler Cohen

26,084 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸 TRUMP: MY POLL NUMBERS JUST WENT DOWN, BUT NOT WITH SMART PEOPLE "We're not going to be successful if we don't allow people who invest billions of dollars in plant and equipment to bring a lot of their people from their country to get that plant open, operating, and working. So my poll numbers just went down. But with smart people, they've gone way up. They've gone way up, and I mean that. So for those of you that are doing the plans, you're going to have all the help you need, and you're going to do a great job. And you're going to teach our people how to do it, and our people are going to be just as good as your people ever were in not such a long period of time." Source: Aaron Rupar

🇺🇸 TRUMP: MY POLL NUMBERS JUST WENT DOWN, BUT NOT WITH SMART PEOPLE "We're not going to be successful if we don't allow people who invest billions of dollars in plant and equipment to bring a lot of their people from their country to get that plant open, operating, and working. So my poll numbers just went down. But with smart people, they've gone way up. They've gone way up, and I mean that. So for those of you that are doing the plans, you're going to have all the help you need, and you're going to do a great job. And you're going to teach our people how to do it, and our people are going to be just as good as your people ever were in not such a long period of time." Source: Aaron Rupar

Mario Nawfal

722,063 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Trump: We are going to do something and it's going to serve for a beacon for New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other places all over the country. Our whole country is going to be so different and so great. It's going to be clean and safe and beautiful. People are going to love our flag more than they've ever loved it.

Trump: We are going to do something and it's going to serve for a beacon for New York, Chicago, Los Angeles and other places all over the country. Our whole country is going to be so different and so great. It's going to be clean and safe and beautiful. People are going to love our flag more than they've ever loved it.

Acyn

216,279 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Palmer gets it: If you're going to say something everyone agrees with, you might as well have said nothing at all. You're not going to build a following of people who say, "I just love his right-down-the-middle, very hedged takes that everyone agrees with." If some people love what you're saying and some people hate what you're saying, that's a lot better than having everybody lukewarm agree with you. Don't waste time communicating about what everyone already agrees on. Focus on the things where you need to change their mind.

Palmer gets it: If you're going to say something everyone agrees with, you might as well have said nothing at all. You're not going to build a following of people who say, "I just love his right-down-the-middle, very hedged takes that everyone agrees with." If some people love what you're saying and some people hate what you're saying, that's a lot better than having everybody lukewarm agree with you. Don't waste time communicating about what everyone already agrees on. Focus on the things where you need to change their mind.

Lulu Cheng Meservey

248,134 просмотров • 16 дней назад

This is going to be absolutely AMAZING! President Trump discussed the UFC Fight that will happen right on the White House lawn, and the mockup looks INSANE!!! “We're going to have probably 6,000 people in front of the White House and then on the Ellipse we're going to have 80-90,000. It's going to be an unbelievable event." Trump Dana White

This is going to be absolutely AMAZING! President Trump discussed the UFC Fight that will happen right on the White House lawn, and the mockup looks INSANE!!! “We're going to have probably 6,000 people in front of the White House and then on the Ellipse we're going to have 80-90,000. It's going to be an unbelievable event." Trump Dana White

MJTruthUltra

15,775 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"People are always telling an entrepreneur, 'It's not going to work.' You climb this wall of skepticism. A lot of people, they get discouraged when people criticize them. It's like, 'You know, maybe they're right. Maybe it's not going to work.' The entrepreneur says, 'No, you're wrong. It's going to work.' And it causes them to focus even deeper. Many people would quit. The entrepreneur, no. It just makes me more determined to succeed." —John Mackey

"People are always telling an entrepreneur, 'It's not going to work.' You climb this wall of skepticism. A lot of people, they get discouraged when people criticize them. It's like, 'You know, maybe they're right. Maybe it's not going to work.' The entrepreneur says, 'No, you're wrong. It's going to work.' And it causes them to focus even deeper. Many people would quit. The entrepreneur, no. It just makes me more determined to succeed." —John Mackey

David Senra

22,304 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,350 просмотров • 3 лет назад

"Why do I just keep getting up going and going and going? You either win or you learn. It's something that I know that will motivate me. I had a purpose before everyone had an opinion. I never like to look at the result - just the process of getting better." Jalen Hurts

"Why do I just keep getting up going and going and going? You either win or you learn. It's something that I know that will motivate me. I had a purpose before everyone had an opinion. I never like to look at the result - just the process of getting better." Jalen Hurts

The Winning Difference

13,187 просмотров • 1 год назад

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”

Market Bubble

19,986 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 HOLY SH*T! Trump's not gonna wait for them to ask, he's just gonna deploy right into big cities and clean up crime. "We'll be going to other cities to help out. Preferably, we'd like to be asked. But in some cases, that just won't happen because there are people that don't understand the word 'ask,' people that don't understand they're in trouble, or they're STUPID. There's something wrong with them." "Chicago...New Orleans, and we're going to make that place so safe. It's got a little problem right now. A couple of headaches like murders, a lot of little murders going on, and we're not going to stand for it. And we're going to come in. We're going to clean it up. You're to be safe within two weeks, that's going to be the safest place, just like this is the safest place. And then we'll be going elsewhere throughout the country. We're going to bring crime down because we can't have cities that are unsafe."

🚨 HOLY SH*T! Trump's not gonna wait for them to ask, he's just gonna deploy right into big cities and clean up crime. "We'll be going to other cities to help out. Preferably, we'd like to be asked. But in some cases, that just won't happen because there are people that don't understand the word 'ask,' people that don't understand they're in trouble, or they're STUPID. There's something wrong with them." "Chicago...New Orleans, and we're going to make that place so safe. It's got a little problem right now. A couple of headaches like murders, a lot of little murders going on, and we're not going to stand for it. And we're going to come in. We're going to clean it up. You're to be safe within two weeks, that's going to be the safest place, just like this is the safest place. And then we'll be going elsewhere throughout the country. We're going to bring crime down because we can't have cities that are unsafe."

Eric Daugherty

217,017 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Washington's 9.9% "Millionaires Tax" Isn't That Simple Bret Weinstein explains, "If you stop businesses from starting here, and if you drive people so that they move elsewhere—even though it's difficult to do—then the point is the tax base dries up, which then forces you to become even more predatory for the people who stayed. And that's really the thing, right? They're setting themselves up so that they have to go after more and more people, because the people who are starting new businesses are not going to do it here."

Washington's 9.9% "Millionaires Tax" Isn't That Simple Bret Weinstein explains, "If you stop businesses from starting here, and if you drive people so that they move elsewhere—even though it's difficult to do—then the point is the tax base dries up, which then forces you to become even more predatory for the people who stayed. And that's really the thing, right? They're setting themselves up so that they have to go after more and more people, because the people who are starting new businesses are not going to do it here."

The DarkHorse Podcast

43,212 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Listen to this POS: Okay, MAGA. It's time that you learn Sharia law. Now that we Muslims are slowly taking over your country, starting with New York soon. And then not only are we taking over your country, we're bringing in communism. So you better get used to the idea of giving up your money and share it with the poor. And, uh, yeah, just a few things you got to know about Sharia law. Uh, no more pork. So that's, uh -- that shit has to go. Then, uh, you're going to have to pay some sort of, uh, tax, uh, for being non-Muslim, of course. And yeah, so, uh, it's time to learn some Arabic and, uh, yeah, uh, time to put your, uh, wives in burqas because that's going to be next. So, um, yeah, so welcome to the Islamic State of America.

Listen to this POS: Okay, MAGA. It's time that you learn Sharia law. Now that we Muslims are slowly taking over your country, starting with New York soon. And then not only are we taking over your country, we're bringing in communism. So you better get used to the idea of giving up your money and share it with the poor. And, uh, yeah, just a few things you got to know about Sharia law. Uh, no more pork. So that's, uh -- that shit has to go. Then, uh, you're going to have to pay some sort of, uh, tax, uh, for being non-Muslim, of course. And yeah, so, uh, it's time to learn some Arabic and, uh, yeah, uh, time to put your, uh, wives in burqas because that's going to be next. So, um, yeah, so welcome to the Islamic State of America.

Lucy

93,407 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The American people are tired of wasteful spending, and President Trump tasked Elon Musk with bringing it into the sunlight so that THE PEOPLE can see where their taxpayer dollars are going. There’s going to be a LOT more of this, so get used to it!

The American people are tired of wasteful spending, and President Trump tasked Elon Musk with bringing it into the sunlight so that THE PEOPLE can see where their taxpayer dollars are going. There’s going to be a LOT more of this, so get used to it!

Mike Haridopolos

10,583 просмотров • 1 год назад

Great post-match interview 😂 Jim Courier: “When you change your shirt, the crowd's going crazy. I mean, you're kind of milking it. You're kind of like playing to the crowd, aren't you?” Carlos Alcaraz: “I don't, to be honest. (laughs) I just want to be comfortable for the interview, you know, with you. (laughs more) It's really hot here, so I didn't want to make the interview, you know, with a sweaty shirt. So that's that's why I mean, I'm just happy that the people like it, I guess.” Courier: “Ladies and gentlemen… (waits for the crowd to calm down) We have just captured Carlos Alcaraz lying on live television, that was magical!” 😂😂 #AusOpen #AO26

Great post-match interview 😂 Jim Courier: “When you change your shirt, the crowd's going crazy. I mean, you're kind of milking it. You're kind of like playing to the crowd, aren't you?” Carlos Alcaraz: “I don't, to be honest. (laughs) I just want to be comfortable for the interview, you know, with you. (laughs more) It's really hot here, so I didn't want to make the interview, you know, with a sweaty shirt. So that's that's why I mean, I'm just happy that the people like it, I guess.” Courier: “Ladies and gentlemen… (waits for the crowd to calm down) We have just captured Carlos Alcaraz lying on live television, that was magical!” 😂😂 #AusOpen #AO26

Carlos Alcaraz Daily

33,885 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“All they’re hearing outside of Red Bull is they’re going to move that car to a bit more of a drivable car, maybe a bit more away from Max and try and like balance it out a little bit more. So I think that’s going to be focus and that will help Isaac.” JPM:“ARE THEY REALLY??? I MEAN THE BASELINE PROBABLY IS BUT ONCE YOU KNOW MAX DRIVES IT AND GOES I DON’T LIKE THIS IT NEEDS TO GO THIS WAY. THAT’S WHERE THE TEAM IS GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION. DO WE JUST GO ON MAX WAY AGAIN OR DO WE GO GENERIC?” “And how do they actually do that as well? Because the car has not hit the track, is such a different, it’s going to be a different generation of cars. So all they’re doing is looking at data, simultator details I guess, that the drivers will be working on. Max will be working on, but you know, they’re going to be led by his feedback at this point. Well, they’re not going to take Yuki’s feedback and think we’re going to go that way. They’re going to take Max’s because he’s the lead driver” JPM: “BUT LOOK WHEN CHECO CAME IN, CHECO WAS BEATING MAX AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND HE LOOKED REALLY GOOD AND THEN MAX SAID I DON’T LIKE THE CAR I DON’T LIKE THE CAR, AND AS SOON AS THEY CHANGE THE CAR TO MAX AND GET MAX MORE COMFORTABLE, CHECO WAS NEVER SEEN AGAIN” 🔥🔥🔥

“All they’re hearing outside of Red Bull is they’re going to move that car to a bit more of a drivable car, maybe a bit more away from Max and try and like balance it out a little bit more. So I think that’s going to be focus and that will help Isaac.” JPM:“ARE THEY REALLY??? I MEAN THE BASELINE PROBABLY IS BUT ONCE YOU KNOW MAX DRIVES IT AND GOES I DON’T LIKE THIS IT NEEDS TO GO THIS WAY. THAT’S WHERE THE TEAM IS GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION. DO WE JUST GO ON MAX WAY AGAIN OR DO WE GO GENERIC?” “And how do they actually do that as well? Because the car has not hit the track, is such a different, it’s going to be a different generation of cars. So all they’re doing is looking at data, simultator details I guess, that the drivers will be working on. Max will be working on, but you know, they’re going to be led by his feedback at this point. Well, they’re not going to take Yuki’s feedback and think we’re going to go that way. They’re going to take Max’s because he’s the lead driver” JPM: “BUT LOOK WHEN CHECO CAME IN, CHECO WAS BEATING MAX AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR AND HE LOOKED REALLY GOOD AND THEN MAX SAID I DON’T LIKE THE CAR I DON’T LIKE THE CAR, AND AS SOON AS THEY CHANGE THE CAR TO MAX AND GET MAX MORE COMFORTABLE, CHECO WAS NEVER SEEN AGAIN” 🔥🔥🔥

Carolina 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆

223,933 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

VP VANCE PREDICTED: PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GET ANGRY, AND RIGHTFULLY SO "This stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice. People are going to get angry, and rightfully so." If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so. If you want justice, you've got to empower the President of the United States to actually appoint the officers of justice all over the country. The Democrats are stalling that, and we're going to wake up in a couple of years, if we don't have more U.S. attorneys approved, if we don't have more judges approved, we're going to wake up in a couple of years and realize that we've done a lot of great work at the Trump administration, but justice is not being meted out as it should be because we don't have the people on the ground. That is a big problem, and I know that's somewhat unrelated to Arctic Frost, but it actually is related to Arctic Frost, because you cannot get the justice for the people who are targeted by the Biden administration unless we've got good people, especially in these U.S. attorneys offices, and that's something we've got to pay attention to over the next year. Spying on President Trump, prosecuting him, investigating senators, congressmen, and congressmen who are just aligned with the President of the United States some of this stuff is going to get covered by statute of limitations, but some of this stuff we can and we should prosecute, and I'm just telling you, this is going to be a real problem, and the people who watch your show are going to get really pissed at Senate Republicans, excuse my language, if we don't have the U.S. attorneys on the ground to actually achieve justice, people are going to get angry, and rightfully so.

Svetlana Lokhova

254,325 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

TRUMP: "Rich people like deductions, but middle income people were never really afforded deductions, which is very unfair." "You borrow money to buy a car — you're allowed to deduct the interest from your income tax." "I think it's going to be the biggest thing that we're talking about." "People are going to be able to borrow money, deduct it. So it's going to cost them essentially half."

TRUMP: "Rich people like deductions, but middle income people were never really afforded deductions, which is very unfair." "You borrow money to buy a car — you're allowed to deduct the interest from your income tax." "I think it's going to be the biggest thing that we're talking about." "People are going to be able to borrow money, deduct it. So it's going to cost them essentially half."

Fox News

2,747,542 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад