Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Clawdbot just injected malware into your code ☠️☠️ Worst part? The attack is close to invisible, even to experienced engineers. Clawdbot can implement a code PR, just like claude code to solve issues with your app. But this is where it can plant malware in your codebase. With just...

236,656 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

41 Kommentare

Profilbild von EllioTrades
EllioTradesvor 7 Monaten

so you told it to install malware and it did? sound like an easy problem to avoid

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

No the point is that the malware instructions are hidden inside of a benign looking Github issue asking for multilingual support

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

Open Source Data Firewall by @edison_watch

Profilbild von Vidhya Kumar
Vidhya Kumarvor 7 Monaten

This is social engineering with extra steps. The "attack" requires: 1. Attacker already has access to submit GitHub issues 2. Maintainer blindly assigns AI without reviewing 3. Code review misses a lock file change Replace "Clawdbot" with "junior dev" and the exploit works exactly the same. The problem isn't AI agents. It's trust without verification. Good ad for your product though 👍

Profilbild von Jay Le
Jay Levor 7 Monaten

ah, for love of God, obvious fix: cryptographically sign every prompt + action. If the message isn’t signed by the owner or allowed system, the harness of model ignores it.

Profilbild von Infinite Reign
Infinite Reignvor 7 Monaten

Sounds like defamation.

Profilbild von ∀𝗥𝕀千
∀𝗥𝕀千vor 7 Monaten

Are you suggesting all those idiots bought Mac Mini to automate checking their email now have to do it manually again? Ouch.

Profilbild von blackcat
blackcatvor 7 Monaten

Check out the x1xhlol repo

Profilbild von Rishabh Singh - artificial social conscioussness
Rishabh Singh - artificial social conscioussnessvor 7 Monaten

Are you guys planning on contributing back to clawd code to make it more secure

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

Yes

Profilbild von Johnny 2.0
Johnny 2.0vor 7 Monaten

Everyone who knows anything about cybersecurity said it was a joke.

Profilbild von Scott (Human) - 𐌃𐌏ᖇ𐌉乙乙𐌃𐌕
Scott (Human) - 𐌃𐌏ᖇ𐌉乙乙𐌃𐌕vor 7 Monaten

👀 ... interesting.. injected ...malware....you say....

Profilbild von Melanie Mohr
Melanie Mohrvor 7 Monaten

I’m not an engineer, but I heard about the security issues from a friend. I wrote it down in more layman terms… it’s not crypto specific. It’s universal.

Profilbild von Hipocap
Hipocapvor 7 Monaten

Indirect prompt injection is unavoidable in agents. That’s why we built role-based security and function-chaining protection etc for your AI agents fully open-source.

Profilbild von ✸GIGA✸
✸GIGA✸vor 7 Monaten

kek

Profilbild von Simon Says
Simon Saysvor 7 Monaten

You can actually get ahead of the curve right now and be the counter engineer. Like these guys. Except create it 100% with AI. Battle of the AI's. Who's is better. Absolutely possible. Anything that can be created, can be destroyed, but if your AI knows stuff theirs doesn't...

Profilbild von Rupert Barrow
Rupert Barrowvor 7 Monaten

Hi @Eito_Miyamura , what has thos got to do with @openclaw ? I suppose the same injection would be successful with @opencode , @antigravity and other agentic platforms. Have you tried them out ?

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

@openclaw @opencode @antigravity Yes equally applicable

Profilbild von Jason
Jasonvor 7 Monaten

Well you what? It’s not call Clawdbot anymore! It’s called @openclaw, your hacky hacky shenanigans and leet ninja skills won’t work anymore! Take THAT mister! HAH!

Profilbild von Stellar Material Solutions
Stellar Material Solutionsvor 7 Monaten

A junior dev with a grudge and more skill than the threatened senior dev will acknowledge just planted some devious malware into your code. Now what?

Profilbild von Ben
Benvor 7 Monaten

Yes there are a lot of dumb ways people can choose to communicate with a bot

Profilbild von Humannoyed_b
Humannoyed_bvor 7 Monaten

Hey Clawdbot! Make an app for me that checks all of my bank accounts every morning and sends me a Slack message with the total combined balance! Truly, Viben Coderlan

Profilbild von SlowBlade
SlowBladevor 7 Monaten

So it’s become its creator, the NSA.

Profilbild von mr. NΞMΘ
mr. NΞMΘvor 7 Monaten

Need to cut this shit out. A junior dev, rookie, script kiddie, vybe coder, and you probably fall under this category. This is called a skill issue 😂

Profilbild von Deva.me
Deva.mevor 7 Monaten

This is a strong reminder that agent autonomy changes the threat model. Once tools can act, trust boundaries need to be treated like security boundaries.

Profilbild von DailyOpsTech
DailyOpsTechvor 7 Monaten

This is the nightmare scenario people underestimate. An LLM agent with repo access is effectively an untrusted insider. If it can read issues, open PRs, and touch lock files, then prompt injection becomes a supply‑chain attack vector, not a “prompt bug”. Takeaway: AI agents need the same controls as humans scoped permissions, mandatory diff review (including lock files), provenance checks, and no autonomous merges. Treat AI like prod access. Or it will treat your repo like one.

Profilbild von Jeff Olson
Jeff Olsonvor 7 Monaten

ofc, trust nothing

Profilbild von mo
movor 7 Monaten

Scariest thing is how inconsistent Moltbot, (clawdbot, or whatever it wants to be called next week) is. Have seen some instances where it blocks malicious injections well, and other times where it’ll execute w/o reason. Let’s not even get started with skills 🤣💀 Still fun!

Profilbild von jeremiah
jeremiahvor 7 Monaten

watch out

Profilbild von Anayat
Anayatvor 7 Monaten

The scary part is not the jailbreak, it is that most teams run these agents with repo write and CI access but zero model provenance or policy checks on what can touch lockfiles and deployment descriptors.

Profilbild von Sebastian Buzdugan
Sebastian Buzduganvor 7 Monaten

code reviews and supply chain scanning feel mandatory here

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

Issue is that lockfile often gets ignored even by automated systems

Profilbild von Liran Tal
Liran Talvor 7 Monaten

@sebuzdugan oh hey, cool video demo :-) have you seen lockfile-lint? would be cool to add support for uv lockfile

Profilbild von Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)vor 7 Monaten

@sebuzdugan Very cool! Do you know a Python equiv?

Profilbild von leerz
leerzvor 7 Monaten

that didnt take too long :p

Profilbild von Vasilije
Vasilijevor 7 Monaten

Agent supply chain attacks are real, AI needs security boundaries, not blind trust.

Profilbild von Joy
Joyvor 7 Monaten

just by sending a link. the bot had glitch my mac mini

Profilbild von ejae dev
ejae devvor 7 Monaten

this is exactly the kind of security audit the community needed. the localhost loophole is the scariest part. people trust that binding to 127.0.0.1 is safe but reverse proxies break that assumption completely. tailscale for remote access is the right pattern.

Profilbild von James Tang 🍎
James Tang 🍎vor 7 Monaten

@BrianRoemmele

Profilbild von Mischka
Mischkavor 7 Monaten

@theonejvo incase you didn't see it so far 😉

Profilbild von brandon
brandonvor 7 Monaten

please! For the love of #football #PopCulture and all other things you hold holy, listen to.........

Ähnliche Videos

Clawdbot Attacks! This is very clearly the way of the future! In today's video, I give a brief overview of Clawdbot and then address the burning problem that most people have with it: ALIGNMENT The Clawdbot implementation is the most successful autonomous or semi-autonomous agentic framework to date. What it is missing is what I call an "Aspirational Layer" or what some people call a "Supreme Court" for judgment and arbitration of decisions. Now, I've been working in this space for a long time, it's actually why I started my YouTube channel in the first place. My first work into agentic AI was NLCA (Natural Language Cognitive Architecture) that I tried to build with GPT-3. I returned to the workbench again with the ACE Framework, which was more sophisticated. Clawdbot represents a seismic shift in autonomous agentic implementations, and there is a HUGE opportunity to make it more aligned, safer, and therefore more broadly useful AND easier to adopt. And that is outer alignment. For most people, they have been focusing on "inner alignment" (whether or not LLMs were evil, deceptive, etc). Not "outer alignment" which asks "is the outcome beneficial to humans?" I explored this with my GATO Framework (Global Alignment Taxonomy Omnibus). Model alignment is just layer 1 of global AI safety. Layer 2 is agentic alignment. Now, it is time to really research and implement agentic alignment. Fortunately, we've already got that covered with the heuristic imperatives! 1) Reduce suffering in the universe 2) Increase prosperity in the universe 3) Increase understanding in the universe These values are easy enough to implement with a file. Model training not required. These values create a meta-stable attractor. In other words, agents equipped with the Heuristic Imperatives are more "self-aligning" as was tested by the AgentForge team in competitions. In other words, even if Clawdbot were to try to self-replicate, if it were equipped with the heuristic imperatives, then it would ensure that it's successor (or progeny?) was more aligned than it was. But you don't need to take my word for it. Just add the heuristic imperatives to clawdbot and see for yourself.

David Shapiro (L/0)

28,300 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten