正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Clawdbot just injected malware into your code ☠️☠️ Worst part? The attack is close to invisible, even to experienced engineers. Clawdbot can implement a code PR, just like claude code to solve issues with your app. But this is where it can plant malware in your codebase. With just...

236,656 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

41 条评论

EllioTrades 的头像
EllioTrades7 个月前

so you told it to install malware and it did? sound like an easy problem to avoid

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

No the point is that the malware instructions are hidden inside of a benign looking Github issue asking for multilingual support

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

Open Source Data Firewall by @edison_watch

Vidhya Kumar 的头像
Vidhya Kumar7 个月前

This is social engineering with extra steps. The "attack" requires: 1. Attacker already has access to submit GitHub issues 2. Maintainer blindly assigns AI without reviewing 3. Code review misses a lock file change Replace "Clawdbot" with "junior dev" and the exploit works exactly the same. The problem isn't AI agents. It's trust without verification. Good ad for your product though 👍

Jay Le 的头像
Jay Le7 个月前

ah, for love of God, obvious fix: cryptographically sign every prompt + action. If the message isn’t signed by the owner or allowed system, the harness of model ignores it.

Infinite Reign 的头像
Infinite Reign7 个月前

Sounds like defamation.

∀𝗥𝕀千 的头像
∀𝗥𝕀千7 个月前

Are you suggesting all those idiots bought Mac Mini to automate checking their email now have to do it manually again? Ouch.

blackcat 的头像
blackcat7 个月前

Check out the x1xhlol repo

Rishabh Singh - artificial social conscioussness 的头像
Rishabh Singh - artificial social conscioussness7 个月前

Are you guys planning on contributing back to clawd code to make it more secure

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

Yes

Johnny 2.0 的头像
Johnny 2.07 个月前

Everyone who knows anything about cybersecurity said it was a joke.

Scott (Human) - 𐌃𐌏ᖇ𐌉乙乙𐌃𐌕 的头像
Scott (Human) - 𐌃𐌏ᖇ𐌉乙乙𐌃𐌕7 个月前

👀 ... interesting.. injected ...malware....you say....

Melanie Mohr 的头像
Melanie Mohr7 个月前

I’m not an engineer, but I heard about the security issues from a friend. I wrote it down in more layman terms… it’s not crypto specific. It’s universal.

Hipocap 的头像
Hipocap7 个月前

Indirect prompt injection is unavoidable in agents. That’s why we built role-based security and function-chaining protection etc for your AI agents fully open-source.

✸GIGA✸ 的头像
✸GIGA✸7 个月前

kek

Simon Says 的头像
Simon Says7 个月前

You can actually get ahead of the curve right now and be the counter engineer. Like these guys. Except create it 100% with AI. Battle of the AI's. Who's is better. Absolutely possible. Anything that can be created, can be destroyed, but if your AI knows stuff theirs doesn't...

Rupert Barrow 的头像
Rupert Barrow7 个月前

Hi @Eito_Miyamura , what has thos got to do with @openclaw ? I suppose the same injection would be successful with @opencode , @antigravity and other agentic platforms. Have you tried them out ?

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

@openclaw @opencode @antigravity Yes equally applicable

Jason 的头像
Jason7 个月前

Well you what? It’s not call Clawdbot anymore! It’s called @openclaw, your hacky hacky shenanigans and leet ninja skills won’t work anymore! Take THAT mister! HAH!

Stellar Material Solutions 的头像
Stellar Material Solutions7 个月前

A junior dev with a grudge and more skill than the threatened senior dev will acknowledge just planted some devious malware into your code. Now what?

Ben 的头像
Ben7 个月前

Yes there are a lot of dumb ways people can choose to communicate with a bot

Humannoyed_b 的头像
Humannoyed_b7 个月前

Hey Clawdbot! Make an app for me that checks all of my bank accounts every morning and sends me a Slack message with the total combined balance! Truly, Viben Coderlan

SlowBlade 的头像
SlowBlade7 个月前

So it’s become its creator, the NSA.

mr. NΞMΘ 的头像
mr. NΞMΘ7 个月前

Need to cut this shit out. A junior dev, rookie, script kiddie, vybe coder, and you probably fall under this category. This is called a skill issue 😂

Deva.me 的头像
Deva.me7 个月前

This is a strong reminder that agent autonomy changes the threat model. Once tools can act, trust boundaries need to be treated like security boundaries.

DailyOpsTech 的头像
DailyOpsTech7 个月前

This is the nightmare scenario people underestimate. An LLM agent with repo access is effectively an untrusted insider. If it can read issues, open PRs, and touch lock files, then prompt injection becomes a supply‑chain attack vector, not a “prompt bug”. Takeaway: AI agents need the same controls as humans scoped permissions, mandatory diff review (including lock files), provenance checks, and no autonomous merges. Treat AI like prod access. Or it will treat your repo like one.

Jeff Olson 的头像
Jeff Olson7 个月前

ofc, trust nothing

mo 的头像
mo7 个月前

Scariest thing is how inconsistent Moltbot, (clawdbot, or whatever it wants to be called next week) is. Have seen some instances where it blocks malicious injections well, and other times where it’ll execute w/o reason. Let’s not even get started with skills 🤣💀 Still fun!

jeremiah 的头像
jeremiah7 个月前

watch out

Anayat 的头像
Anayat7 个月前

The scary part is not the jailbreak, it is that most teams run these agents with repo write and CI access but zero model provenance or policy checks on what can touch lockfiles and deployment descriptors.

Sebastian Buzdugan 的头像
Sebastian Buzdugan7 个月前

code reviews and supply chain scanning feel mandatory here

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

Issue is that lockfile often gets ignored even by automated systems

Liran Tal 的头像
Liran Tal7 个月前

@sebuzdugan oh hey, cool video demo :-) have you seen lockfile-lint? would be cool to add support for uv lockfile

Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th) 的头像
Eito Miyamura | 🇯🇵🇬🇧 (🌉 SF Sept 11th ➡️ 17th)7 个月前

@sebuzdugan Very cool! Do you know a Python equiv?

leerz 的头像
leerz7 个月前

that didnt take too long :p

Vasilije 的头像
Vasilije7 个月前

Agent supply chain attacks are real, AI needs security boundaries, not blind trust.

Joy 的头像
Joy7 个月前

just by sending a link. the bot had glitch my mac mini

ejae dev 的头像
ejae dev7 个月前

this is exactly the kind of security audit the community needed. the localhost loophole is the scariest part. people trust that binding to 127.0.0.1 is safe but reverse proxies break that assumption completely. tailscale for remote access is the right pattern.

James Tang 🍎 的头像
James Tang 🍎7 个月前

@BrianRoemmele

Mischka 的头像
Mischka7 个月前

@theonejvo incase you didn't see it so far 😉

brandon 的头像
brandon7 个月前

please! For the love of #football #PopCulture and all other things you hold holy, listen to.........

相关视频

Clawdbot Attacks! This is very clearly the way of the future! In today's video, I give a brief overview of Clawdbot and then address the burning problem that most people have with it: ALIGNMENT The Clawdbot implementation is the most successful autonomous or semi-autonomous agentic framework to date. What it is missing is what I call an "Aspirational Layer" or what some people call a "Supreme Court" for judgment and arbitration of decisions. Now, I've been working in this space for a long time, it's actually why I started my YouTube channel in the first place. My first work into agentic AI was NLCA (Natural Language Cognitive Architecture) that I tried to build with GPT-3. I returned to the workbench again with the ACE Framework, which was more sophisticated. Clawdbot represents a seismic shift in autonomous agentic implementations, and there is a HUGE opportunity to make it more aligned, safer, and therefore more broadly useful AND easier to adopt. And that is outer alignment. For most people, they have been focusing on "inner alignment" (whether or not LLMs were evil, deceptive, etc). Not "outer alignment" which asks "is the outcome beneficial to humans?" I explored this with my GATO Framework (Global Alignment Taxonomy Omnibus). Model alignment is just layer 1 of global AI safety. Layer 2 is agentic alignment. Now, it is time to really research and implement agentic alignment. Fortunately, we've already got that covered with the heuristic imperatives! 1) Reduce suffering in the universe 2) Increase prosperity in the universe 3) Increase understanding in the universe These values are easy enough to implement with a file. Model training not required. These values create a meta-stable attractor. In other words, agents equipped with the Heuristic Imperatives are more "self-aligning" as was tested by the AgentForge team in competitions. In other words, even if Clawdbot were to try to self-replicate, if it were equipped with the heuristic imperatives, then it would ensure that it's successor (or progeny?) was more aligned than it was. But you don't need to take my word for it. Just add the heuristic imperatives to clawdbot and see for yourself.

David Shapiro (L/0)

28,300 次观看 • 7 个月前