Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Cleverly's car crash interview on Conservatives placing bets on the election Trevor Philips, "Is it a sign or moral decay that your Conservative party colleagues were more interested in stuffing their pockets with gambling, than on helping hard pressed families in a cost of living crisis" James Cleverly, "There...

implausibleblog's profile picture

Farrukh

125,467 subscribers

719,917 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 Comments

Farrukh's profile picture
Farrukh2 years ago

Support your local MPs

Barry's profile picture
Barry2 years ago

It's perfectly reasonable for Sunak to ask them if they did or didn't. If they admit it, sack them, if they deny it, then further investigation. He won't do it, because he doesn't want to sack people now he can't replace them at the GE candidates. Party over Country AGAIN

Akash Maniam's profile picture
Akash Maniam2 years ago

Won't be surprised if the commission finds this was a far bigger deal than we know so far. These guys have no credibility.

Nigel Hunt's profile picture
Nigel Hunt2 years ago

@cretaKate All came out to discuss Angela rayner when a police investigation was on going

rach💙 👻's profile picture
rach💙 👻2 years ago

No morales at all

Em's profile picture
Em2 years ago

These Tories are the same in every scandal. They won't resign or sack people for wrong-doing. The people who placed the bets will mutter "Sorry", then all of the Tory MPs will leap to the defence of them and say: "Look! He APOLOGISED! I consider the matter closed. Now Move On".

ColG also on bluesky🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎸☘️⚽🏉's profile picture
ColG also on bluesky🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎸☘️⚽🏉2 years ago

Misconduct in office is the responsibility of the employer first and Sunak should have done what Phillips said, it really is that simple. Cleverly? 🤬🤬🤬T.

Nigel Haworth's profile picture
Nigel Haworth2 years ago

What? It’s the gambling commission’s role to sack cabinet ministers? Well I’ve learned something this morning.

Related Videos

James Cleverly argues with Krishnan Guru-Murthy live on air 🤯 KGM, "After Liz Truss budget you said changing PM would be a disastrously bad idea" JC, "Inflation has come down" KGM, "Was it a bad idea or a good idea?" JC, "Labour have not been honest with the British people" KGM, "We're off the point. Let's stick with your record" JC, "Oh no, hang on, no, you went through a long history of things" KGM, "That's my job, I'm asking you questions" JC, "Let me finish my point.. My job is to answer those questions" KGM, "You're not" JC, "The fact is Keir Starmer confessed to being dishonest" KGM, "This is not a soap box for you to say whatever you want. I'm asking about your record" JC, "We now hear the shadow number two at the treasury basically saying they're being dishonest about green taxes" KGM, "Let's talk about the Home Office, because you're the Home Secretary" JC keeps waffling on KGM, "James Cleverly, this is not a speech. Please stop, I want to ask you a question" JC, "Well you keep making statements and not asking questions.. I'm answering the questions that you have got in backlog. And you keep interrupting and preventing me from answering questions when its inconvenient to you" KGM, "Was net migration of 700,000 as a result of the immigration system that your government was in charge of, after you took back control after Brexit, a good or a bad thing for Britain?" JC, "We have said they have been too high" KGM, "They were your rules" JC, "Ohh, please let me answer the question, you keep interrupting.. We have said that figure is too high.. Keir Starmer has said that he believes all immigration law is racist" KGM, "I'm asking about you.. You called Theresa May's 2017 election somewhere between the worst campaign in living memory and the worst campaign ever. Where do you rank Rishi Sunak's?" JC, "Well, all campaigns are difficult"
4:38

James Cleverly argues with Krishnan Guru-Murthy live on air 🤯 KGM, "After Liz Truss budget you said changing PM would be a disastrously bad idea" JC, "Inflation has come down" KGM, "Was it a bad idea or a good idea?" JC, "Labour have not been honest with the British people" KGM, "We're off the point. Let's stick with your record" JC, "Oh no, hang on, no, you went through a long history of things" KGM, "That's my job, I'm asking you questions" JC, "Let me finish my point.. My job is to answer those questions" KGM, "You're not" JC, "The fact is Keir Starmer confessed to being dishonest" KGM, "This is not a soap box for you to say whatever you want. I'm asking about your record" JC, "We now hear the shadow number two at the treasury basically saying they're being dishonest about green taxes" KGM, "Let's talk about the Home Office, because you're the Home Secretary" JC keeps waffling on KGM, "James Cleverly, this is not a speech. Please stop, I want to ask you a question" JC, "Well you keep making statements and not asking questions.. I'm answering the questions that you have got in backlog. And you keep interrupting and preventing me from answering questions when its inconvenient to you" KGM, "Was net migration of 700,000 as a result of the immigration system that your government was in charge of, after you took back control after Brexit, a good or a bad thing for Britain?" JC, "We have said they have been too high" KGM, "They were your rules" JC, "Ohh, please let me answer the question, you keep interrupting.. We have said that figure is too high.. Keir Starmer has said that he believes all immigration law is racist" KGM, "I'm asking about you.. You called Theresa May's 2017 election somewhere between the worst campaign in living memory and the worst campaign ever. Where do you rank Rishi Sunak's?" JC, "Well, all campaigns are difficult"

Farrukh

882,480 views • 2 years ago

The Counter-Strike Content Scene might have a big problem on YouTube... YouTube removed my video for promoting unlicensed gambling despite it NOT containing any mention of gambling / case opening websites. They refuse to back down and at the same time they REFUSE to specify at which time the "promotion" is located. If they don't give us this information, I will not know how to avoid this in the future, and releasing videos becomes quite scary as I risk the removal of the entire channel despite not doing anything wrong intentionally. This is a extremely frustrating problem to have as I see a multitude of channels directly promote gambling sites and nothing is done to them, while at the same time I chose to NOT take gambling website money to avoid problems like this, it makes no sense. The only thing they have provided us is a link to their policy (I will share this in the post below so you can read it too if you want) which states Direct promotion of gambling is not allowed, but I repeat, there was none. As it was a documentary about a Counter-Strike player - Xantares, there were images of him wearing jerseys that had the names of gambling websites on them, but that is not a direct promotion. I'd like to ask the community to like & retweet this for visibility, and ideally if anyone is in contact with a person on the YouTube team that could give us a good faith explanation of what we did wrong, it would really help out not only just me, but the entire community because if I won't be able to release videos due to fear of getting strikes, I will not be the only creator is affected. At the same time I decided to upload the video here, on X, to invite the community to point out if they see how I broke the YT policy. Maybe I and my team just don't see something obvious, that would be the best case scenario... TeamYouTube
18:03

The Counter-Strike Content Scene might have a big problem on YouTube... YouTube removed my video for promoting unlicensed gambling despite it NOT containing any mention of gambling / case opening websites. They refuse to back down and at the same time they REFUSE to specify at which time the "promotion" is located. If they don't give us this information, I will not know how to avoid this in the future, and releasing videos becomes quite scary as I risk the removal of the entire channel despite not doing anything wrong intentionally. This is a extremely frustrating problem to have as I see a multitude of channels directly promote gambling sites and nothing is done to them, while at the same time I chose to NOT take gambling website money to avoid problems like this, it makes no sense. The only thing they have provided us is a link to their policy (I will share this in the post below so you can read it too if you want) which states Direct promotion of gambling is not allowed, but I repeat, there was none. As it was a documentary about a Counter-Strike player - Xantares, there were images of him wearing jerseys that had the names of gambling websites on them, but that is not a direct promotion. I'd like to ask the community to like & retweet this for visibility, and ideally if anyone is in contact with a person on the YouTube team that could give us a good faith explanation of what we did wrong, it would really help out not only just me, but the entire community because if I won't be able to release videos due to fear of getting strikes, I will not be the only creator is affected. At the same time I decided to upload the video here, on X, to invite the community to point out if they see how I broke the YT policy. Maybe I and my team just don't see something obvious, that would be the best case scenario... TeamYouTube

Josh Nathan

45,982 views • 6 months ago

Asmongold responds to Hasan placing blame on him & others for contributing to the fractured streamer environment, says it started when Piker, Pokimane, etc went after gambling & playing moral high ground about it "Everybody was on xQc's side..all the comments..there's an obvious double standard that big Twitch streamers have" "Not true..they would absolutely egg this on..all the time..I lean into it all the time, I think it's hilarious..I love sh-ing on ppl for being ret*rded..I do it for fun..if I can make things worse for them I'm gonna do it bc I don't like them" "The reason why the community d*ed is bc Hasan & number of others..wanted to virtue signal about how bad gambling was..I was also against the gambling too but I didn't do so from this moral high ground where I'm better than u..u were trying to tell somebody else what they can do on their stream..the amount of personal attacks..u tried to assign..was very aggressive..u made them ur enemy" "If u look at now..still a lot of the ppl that were pro gambling vs anti gambling..those friend groups are basically in tact" "U got detained by TSA for like what 10 min..that's crazy" "Cinna wasn't even around then, she doesn't understand the history of it"
5:53

Asmongold responds to Hasan placing blame on him & others for contributing to the fractured streamer environment, says it started when Piker, Pokimane, etc went after gambling & playing moral high ground about it "Everybody was on xQc's side..all the comments..there's an obvious double standard that big Twitch streamers have" "Not true..they would absolutely egg this on..all the time..I lean into it all the time, I think it's hilarious..I love sh-ing on ppl for being ret*rded..I do it for fun..if I can make things worse for them I'm gonna do it bc I don't like them" "The reason why the community d*ed is bc Hasan & number of others..wanted to virtue signal about how bad gambling was..I was also against the gambling too but I didn't do so from this moral high ground where I'm better than u..u were trying to tell somebody else what they can do on their stream..the amount of personal attacks..u tried to assign..was very aggressive..u made them ur enemy" "If u look at now..still a lot of the ppl that were pro gambling vs anti gambling..those friend groups are basically in tact" "U got detained by TSA for like what 10 min..that's crazy" "Cinna wasn't even around then, she doesn't understand the history of it"

yeet

68,440 views • 3 months ago

WARREN BUFFETT JUST GAVE HIS SHARPEST MARKET WARNING IN YEARS AT THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY SHAREHOLDER MEETING His exact words on today's market: "The market always feels like a church with a casino attached. People can move between the church and the casino. There are more people in the church and more people in the casino, but the casino has gotten very attractive to people." "If you're buying one-day options or selling them, that is not speculating. That is gambling. Totally. There's nobody that can explain why they're buying an option for one day." "We've never had people in a more gambling mood than now." "That doesn't mean the thing is terrible, but it does mean that the prices for an awful lot of things will look very silly." The 95-year-old "Oracle of Omaha" is speaking today as Berkshire sits on roughly $380 billion in cash, the largest cash position in the company's history. Greg Abel is running the meeting as CEO for the first time. When asked what would create a juicy investment opportunity for him, Buffett's answer: "It's a phone call in some cases."
5:06

WARREN BUFFETT JUST GAVE HIS SHARPEST MARKET WARNING IN YEARS AT THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY SHAREHOLDER MEETING His exact words on today's market: "The market always feels like a church with a casino attached. People can move between the church and the casino. There are more people in the church and more people in the casino, but the casino has gotten very attractive to people." "If you're buying one-day options or selling them, that is not speculating. That is gambling. Totally. There's nobody that can explain why they're buying an option for one day." "We've never had people in a more gambling mood than now." "That doesn't mean the thing is terrible, but it does mean that the prices for an awful lot of things will look very silly." The 95-year-old "Oracle of Omaha" is speaking today as Berkshire sits on roughly $380 billion in cash, the largest cash position in the company's history. Greg Abel is running the meeting as CEO for the first time. When asked what would create a juicy investment opportunity for him, Buffett's answer: "It's a phone call in some cases."

FSMN

889,548 views • 2 months ago

BREAKING: President Trump reacts to his THIRD indictment just after pleading not-guilty on all charges: TRUMP: "This is a very sad day for America. And it was also very sad driving through Washington, DC and seeing the filth and the decay...this is not the same place that I left. "This is the persecution of the person that's leading by very substantial numbers in the Republican Primary and leading Biden by a lot. So if you can beat them, you persecute them or you prosecute them. We can't let this happen in America."
1:12

BREAKING: President Trump reacts to his THIRD indictment just after pleading not-guilty on all charges: TRUMP: "This is a very sad day for America. And it was also very sad driving through Washington, DC and seeing the filth and the decay...this is not the same place that I left. "This is the persecution of the person that's leading by very substantial numbers in the Republican Primary and leading Biden by a lot. So if you can beat them, you persecute them or you prosecute them. We can't let this happen in America."

Charlie Kirk

2,085,916 views • 3 years ago

The Democrats' solution to homelessness is to give the people "living" on Skid Row a home (at the cost of $1.5 million per "low income" unit in LA). Except it's not the cost of housing or the lack of homes that create Skid Row or tent cities under the highway or drugged out zombies 50 feet from your $2 million house. If any of your friends or neighbors lost their house, would they end up on Skid Row? No. They'd be on your couch or in someone's guest room, because they have a social network to lean on, because they don't abuse drugs or alcohol or have an untreated mental illness. Untreated addiction and/or mental illness = burning through your social network. 99.9% of people living on the streets (maybe 100%) are there because there is something seriously wrong with them that they and professionals must address. And if they won't or can't do it themselves, the state must step in for their sake and ours — not by giving them homes but mandating treatment. Mayor Matt Mahan seems like a nice enough guy and maybe the only somewhat normal Democrat running, but he's just totally wrong in this exchange with Sheriff Chad Bianco.
0:38

The Democrats' solution to homelessness is to give the people "living" on Skid Row a home (at the cost of $1.5 million per "low income" unit in LA). Except it's not the cost of housing or the lack of homes that create Skid Row or tent cities under the highway or drugged out zombies 50 feet from your $2 million house. If any of your friends or neighbors lost their house, would they end up on Skid Row? No. They'd be on your couch or in someone's guest room, because they have a social network to lean on, because they don't abuse drugs or alcohol or have an untreated mental illness. Untreated addiction and/or mental illness = burning through your social network. 99.9% of people living on the streets (maybe 100%) are there because there is something seriously wrong with them that they and professionals must address. And if they won't or can't do it themselves, the state must step in for their sake and ours — not by giving them homes but mandating treatment. Mayor Matt Mahan seems like a nice enough guy and maybe the only somewhat normal Democrat running, but he's just totally wrong in this exchange with Sheriff Chad Bianco.

Jared Sichel

14,016 views • 2 months ago

Nigel Farage's six minute rant on Sky News where be blames Muslims and immigration for the country's woes - revolting NF, "We have a growing number of young people who do not subscribe to British values" TP, "Who are we talking about?" NF, "We see them on the streets of London every Saturday" TP, "Are we talking about Muslims?" NF, "We are.. Poll says 46% of British Muslims support Hamas.. Rishi Sunak is building up far more of the Muslim population than anyone before in our history" TP, "Are you sure you want to make the blanket accusation that Muslims are somehow less patriotic than other British people?" NF, "We have to face the fact.. Irresponsible open door immigration.. Nobody in history has left people in who are fighting against British values than Rishi Sunak" TP, "Is this the Reform campaign.. That immigration means our values are threatened.. And we are unhappy with Muslims?" NF, "We have never before seen anything like this" TP, "My ancestors for the best part of 700-800 years were Muslims until they were forcibly converted to Christianity by slave owners.. So when you talk about Muslims as hostile to British values, I don't really see how you arrive at that conclusion" NF, "How many people in your community don't speak English? I can take you to streets in Oldham where no one speaks English" TP, "I've been there to, but come on, you're not serious?" NF, "I'm not here to attack the religion of Islam" TP, "Well you've just been doing it" NF, "No I haven't.. I've been telling you these alarming figures form recent polls in the wake of what has happened on October 7th and in Gaza and we have a real problem here" "Numbers on immigration need to be sensible otherwise everyone's quality of life gets diminished. Diminished in every way because you can't get a GP appoint.. Because you can't travel anywhere without traffic jams.. Because getting on a housing ladder is impossible" TP, "I want to be clear.. Everything you have just said suggests that the Reform platform is that every problem that you face is down to immigrants and in particular to Muslims, is that really what you're saying?" NF, "Most people aren't affected by this.. The areas with anti British values to be at the moment very highly concentrated" TP, "But you're not resiling from blaming that community" NF, "I'm blaming elements of that community.. I'm not blaming them, I'm stating a fact.. All I'm doing is stating a fact"
6:04

Nigel Farage's six minute rant on Sky News where be blames Muslims and immigration for the country's woes - revolting NF, "We have a growing number of young people who do not subscribe to British values" TP, "Who are we talking about?" NF, "We see them on the streets of London every Saturday" TP, "Are we talking about Muslims?" NF, "We are.. Poll says 46% of British Muslims support Hamas.. Rishi Sunak is building up far more of the Muslim population than anyone before in our history" TP, "Are you sure you want to make the blanket accusation that Muslims are somehow less patriotic than other British people?" NF, "We have to face the fact.. Irresponsible open door immigration.. Nobody in history has left people in who are fighting against British values than Rishi Sunak" TP, "Is this the Reform campaign.. That immigration means our values are threatened.. And we are unhappy with Muslims?" NF, "We have never before seen anything like this" TP, "My ancestors for the best part of 700-800 years were Muslims until they were forcibly converted to Christianity by slave owners.. So when you talk about Muslims as hostile to British values, I don't really see how you arrive at that conclusion" NF, "How many people in your community don't speak English? I can take you to streets in Oldham where no one speaks English" TP, "I've been there to, but come on, you're not serious?" NF, "I'm not here to attack the religion of Islam" TP, "Well you've just been doing it" NF, "No I haven't.. I've been telling you these alarming figures form recent polls in the wake of what has happened on October 7th and in Gaza and we have a real problem here" "Numbers on immigration need to be sensible otherwise everyone's quality of life gets diminished. Diminished in every way because you can't get a GP appoint.. Because you can't travel anywhere without traffic jams.. Because getting on a housing ladder is impossible" TP, "I want to be clear.. Everything you have just said suggests that the Reform platform is that every problem that you face is down to immigrants and in particular to Muslims, is that really what you're saying?" NF, "Most people aren't affected by this.. The areas with anti British values to be at the moment very highly concentrated" TP, "But you're not resiling from blaming that community" NF, "I'm blaming elements of that community.. I'm not blaming them, I'm stating a fact.. All I'm doing is stating a fact"

Farrukh

3,802,606 views • 2 years ago

Gambling companies are finding loopholes to entice vulnerable people back onto their platform - even when people have decided they want to stop gambling and self excluded on BetStop. This is what happens when you leave gaps that can be exploited by what is known to be a predatory industry. And it shows what will happen if the Government opts for a partial ban on gambling ads, rather than a full ban. The late Labor MP Peta Murphy and her committee report gave us the blueprint for change, it's time for the government to implement the Murphy Report recommendations in full. If you want to read more, this is from Peta Murphy's Foreword to the committee report: "Online gambling companies advertise so much in Australia because it works. Online gambling has been deliberately and strategically marketed alongside sport, which has normalised it as a fun, harmless, and sociable activity that is part of a favourite pastime. Gambling advertising is grooming children and young people to gamble and encourages riskier behaviour. The torrent of advertising is inescapable. It is manipulating an impressionable and vulnerable audience to gamble online. Australia’s largest professional sporting codes and broadcast media were largely in lockstep with their advertising and sponsorship partners in the gambling industry during this inquiry to oppose further restrictions. The Committee shares the concerns of many witnesses and the community that the status quo is leading to a generation of young Australians who view gambling and sport as inextricably linked. This is concerning, not only because of the potential increase in Australians experiencing gambling harm, but also about changes to the culture of sport. Australia would be diminished if sport was to be so captured by gambling revenue that providing an opportunity for betting came to be seen as its primary purpose. A phased, comprehensive ban on all gambling advertising on all media – broadcast and online, that leaves no room for circumvention, is needed. Partial bans on gambling advertising do not work. The 2017 media reforms resulted in gambling advertising on television increasing. Harmful industries have shown they will identify and capitalise on any gaps in marketing restrictions and that they are taking advantage of the less regulated online environment. The advertising ban should be enforced sequentially, with advertising that has the highest risk of harm to be addressed immediately. To enable sporting bodies and broadcasters adequate time to locate alternative sources of advertising revenue and to comply with current contractual obligations, the Committee recommends that the comprehensive ban be phased in over a three-year period."
1:19

Gambling companies are finding loopholes to entice vulnerable people back onto their platform - even when people have decided they want to stop gambling and self excluded on BetStop. This is what happens when you leave gaps that can be exploited by what is known to be a predatory industry. And it shows what will happen if the Government opts for a partial ban on gambling ads, rather than a full ban. The late Labor MP Peta Murphy and her committee report gave us the blueprint for change, it's time for the government to implement the Murphy Report recommendations in full. If you want to read more, this is from Peta Murphy's Foreword to the committee report: "Online gambling companies advertise so much in Australia because it works. Online gambling has been deliberately and strategically marketed alongside sport, which has normalised it as a fun, harmless, and sociable activity that is part of a favourite pastime. Gambling advertising is grooming children and young people to gamble and encourages riskier behaviour. The torrent of advertising is inescapable. It is manipulating an impressionable and vulnerable audience to gamble online. Australia’s largest professional sporting codes and broadcast media were largely in lockstep with their advertising and sponsorship partners in the gambling industry during this inquiry to oppose further restrictions. The Committee shares the concerns of many witnesses and the community that the status quo is leading to a generation of young Australians who view gambling and sport as inextricably linked. This is concerning, not only because of the potential increase in Australians experiencing gambling harm, but also about changes to the culture of sport. Australia would be diminished if sport was to be so captured by gambling revenue that providing an opportunity for betting came to be seen as its primary purpose. A phased, comprehensive ban on all gambling advertising on all media – broadcast and online, that leaves no room for circumvention, is needed. Partial bans on gambling advertising do not work. The 2017 media reforms resulted in gambling advertising on television increasing. Harmful industries have shown they will identify and capitalise on any gaps in marketing restrictions and that they are taking advantage of the less regulated online environment. The advertising ban should be enforced sequentially, with advertising that has the highest risk of harm to be addressed immediately. To enable sporting bodies and broadcasters adequate time to locate alternative sources of advertising revenue and to comply with current contractual obligations, the Committee recommends that the comprehensive ban be phased in over a three-year period."

David Pocock

47,114 views • 9 months ago

I told you two weeks ago the NBA gambling scandal was just the tip of the iceberg. Now it’s happened again — Major League Baseball. Four of the five New York crime families involved, Cleveland Guardians pitcher Emmanuel Clase indicted for rigging prop bets with his pitches. I’ve been warning the leagues about this for 30 years. When they recruited me to speak to athletes, I told them: the more access you give players to gambling, the more problems you’ll have. Now the leagues are partnering with gambling sites, making millions off the players’ backs while telling those same players they can’t bet. The players are resentful. I know this for a fact — I’ve had contact with people in the sport. Here’s what nobody’s telling you: this is widespread, it’s easy, and it’s going to continue. You can bet on anything now — every pitch, every play. Clase did this for two years before getting caught. How much money was made? And why isn’t “Bettor One” being named? Could be an informant, maybe even undercover FBI. The crime rate rises in every city that legalizes gambling. I’ve seen more lives destroyed by gambling than drugs or alcohol.
29:46

I told you two weeks ago the NBA gambling scandal was just the tip of the iceberg. Now it’s happened again — Major League Baseball. Four of the five New York crime families involved, Cleveland Guardians pitcher Emmanuel Clase indicted for rigging prop bets with his pitches. I’ve been warning the leagues about this for 30 years. When they recruited me to speak to athletes, I told them: the more access you give players to gambling, the more problems you’ll have. Now the leagues are partnering with gambling sites, making millions off the players’ backs while telling those same players they can’t bet. The players are resentful. I know this for a fact — I’ve had contact with people in the sport. Here’s what nobody’s telling you: this is widespread, it’s easy, and it’s going to continue. You can bet on anything now — every pitch, every play. Clase did this for two years before getting caught. How much money was made? And why isn’t “Bettor One” being named? Could be an informant, maybe even undercover FBI. The crime rate rises in every city that legalizes gambling. I’ve seen more lives destroyed by gambling than drugs or alcohol.

Michael Franzese

34,310 views • 8 months ago

Steve Jobs on why "that's how we've always done it" is the most dangerous phrase in business: "In most companies if you're new and you ask why is it done this way, the answer is because that's the way we do it here or because that's the way it's always been done" "That single shift is everything in my opinion because in that shift is a tremendous optimistic point of view about the people that work in a company. It says these people are very smart, they're not pawns, they're very smart, and if given the opportunity to change and improve they will improve the processes"
1:21

Steve Jobs on why "that's how we've always done it" is the most dangerous phrase in business: "In most companies if you're new and you ask why is it done this way, the answer is because that's the way we do it here or because that's the way it's always been done" "That single shift is everything in my opinion because in that shift is a tremendous optimistic point of view about the people that work in a company. It says these people are very smart, they're not pawns, they're very smart, and if given the opportunity to change and improve they will improve the processes"

Jaynit

21,813 views • 3 months ago

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."
0:44

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."

CaughtOffside

39,038 views • 5 months ago

Robert Altman on his Gambling addiction & his attitude towards Gambling: "The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' (1974) was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." Full Excerpt: "I think gambling is just action, and why not? What is there to hoard? I don’t think I have ever jeopardized anybody’s existence by my gambling. Actually, for the last fifteen years or so I’ve been kind of bored with it, because it doesn’t mean anything — what’s the most I could win? Buying lottery tickets, that isn’t gambling. That’s just throwing your hat in the ring. I don’t think gamblers want to lose. But there are people who are addicted to it. At one time I could stand at a crap table for two days — the feeling is like sex. Compulsive gamblers lie to themselves, to everybody. I think I became embarrassed that maybe I was becoming a compulsive gambler. When I was making Tanner ’88, I bet on every game on every day of the baseball season. There’s a moral blanket over gambling. It’s considered immoral, it’s not what you’re supposed to do. I think the greatest theatrical opening scene ever was in "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," when the guys are tossing coins, and one of them wins every time. The odds are against that, yet they’re not. Every time you throw a coin, the odds are fifty—-fifty. When you say I’ve thrown heads six hundred times in a row, what are the odds of that happening? Well, mathematically they’re tremendous, but to say that now you’re going to bet on tails because the odds are way in your favour — the odds are not in your favour. So you try this guessing game, ‘I’ve got a hunch, I feel it...’ That was the whole point of California Split, when at the end George Segal turned to Elliott Gould and said, “There was no special feeling.’ He never felt it, because he has nothing to feel! The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." ('Altman on Altman', Edited by David Thompson, 2006)
2:08

Sensitive content

Robert Altman on his Gambling addiction & his attitude towards Gambling: "The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' (1974) was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." Full Excerpt: "I think gambling is just action, and why not? What is there to hoard? I don’t think I have ever jeopardized anybody’s existence by my gambling. Actually, for the last fifteen years or so I’ve been kind of bored with it, because it doesn’t mean anything — what’s the most I could win? Buying lottery tickets, that isn’t gambling. That’s just throwing your hat in the ring. I don’t think gamblers want to lose. But there are people who are addicted to it. At one time I could stand at a crap table for two days — the feeling is like sex. Compulsive gamblers lie to themselves, to everybody. I think I became embarrassed that maybe I was becoming a compulsive gambler. When I was making Tanner ’88, I bet on every game on every day of the baseball season. There’s a moral blanket over gambling. It’s considered immoral, it’s not what you’re supposed to do. I think the greatest theatrical opening scene ever was in "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," when the guys are tossing coins, and one of them wins every time. The odds are against that, yet they’re not. Every time you throw a coin, the odds are fifty—-fifty. When you say I’ve thrown heads six hundred times in a row, what are the odds of that happening? Well, mathematically they’re tremendous, but to say that now you’re going to bet on tails because the odds are way in your favour — the odds are not in your favour. So you try this guessing game, ‘I’ve got a hunch, I feel it...’ That was the whole point of California Split, when at the end George Segal turned to Elliott Gould and said, “There was no special feeling.’ He never felt it, because he has nothing to feel! The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." ('Altman on Altman', Edited by David Thompson, 2006)

DepressedBergman

119,994 views • 5 months ago

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 views • 7 months ago

TikTok just released new terms of service and make all accounts agree to them. American ran them through AI, here’s the breakdown - You can't be critical of political figures - Political groups could be blacklisted. A lot of the violation could be so it's subject to interpretation, their interpretation - In matters of social unrest or crisis, they can just change the rules, shut it down completely, whatever they decide to do - You're not allowed to mention other platforms, anything misleading, even if it's a joke. Can't tell jokes anymore because somebody might be confused - You are not allowed to criticize religion - There's a ban on dangerous stunts, so no more Nicki Minaj challenges with the high heels - You're not allowed to say sexy on your live feeds - You're also not allowed to say any brand names - You can't use AI to edit something or make it more realistic - You can't do anything funny with your pet if it's staged, they can say no, that's a violation - Can't have anything to do with being too skinny. No more skinny talk. - The prevention of harm. If they deem it that it could hurt somebody financially or emotionally, that rule is very vague and subject to just whatever they feel like saying - They can pull your video from the FYP page without deleting it, just calling it ineligible - They can decide if your video is not suitable for under 18 - They can change the rules on the fly, depending on where you're viewing from, like your geographic location. - Showing flags or logos in any kind of speech or using objects like, you know, how some people hold up the papers and stuff, that won't be allowed anymore. - If they decide your video helps a banned group, whoever they choose to ban, if they decide that you're helping them, that's a violation - If someone picks a fight with you and you do a clap back, that's a violation - If you've done things on a different platform, that's a violation - On TikTok now they reserve the right to limit who can search your videos, depending on if they like the content or not - If you win an appeal now, it doesn't mean that you're going to get back on the for you page. That doesn't. That doesn't matter anymore. You can win, but they still reserve the right to not show your video on the fyp - If you post a link, that can get your account banned completely. Not even a violation, just banned. “This is just crazy. This goes to, in fact, in effect September 13th. I think that's also when they're supposed to roll out the new TikTok for the United States. That'll probably have more rules than this one.”
4:40

TikTok just released new terms of service and make all accounts agree to them. American ran them through AI, here’s the breakdown - You can't be critical of political figures - Political groups could be blacklisted. A lot of the violation could be so it's subject to interpretation, their interpretation - In matters of social unrest or crisis, they can just change the rules, shut it down completely, whatever they decide to do - You're not allowed to mention other platforms, anything misleading, even if it's a joke. Can't tell jokes anymore because somebody might be confused - You are not allowed to criticize religion - There's a ban on dangerous stunts, so no more Nicki Minaj challenges with the high heels - You're not allowed to say sexy on your live feeds - You're also not allowed to say any brand names - You can't use AI to edit something or make it more realistic - You can't do anything funny with your pet if it's staged, they can say no, that's a violation - Can't have anything to do with being too skinny. No more skinny talk. - The prevention of harm. If they deem it that it could hurt somebody financially or emotionally, that rule is very vague and subject to just whatever they feel like saying - They can pull your video from the FYP page without deleting it, just calling it ineligible - They can decide if your video is not suitable for under 18 - They can change the rules on the fly, depending on where you're viewing from, like your geographic location. - Showing flags or logos in any kind of speech or using objects like, you know, how some people hold up the papers and stuff, that won't be allowed anymore. - If they decide your video helps a banned group, whoever they choose to ban, if they decide that you're helping them, that's a violation - If someone picks a fight with you and you do a clap back, that's a violation - If you've done things on a different platform, that's a violation - On TikTok now they reserve the right to limit who can search your videos, depending on if they like the content or not - If you win an appeal now, it doesn't mean that you're going to get back on the for you page. That doesn't. That doesn't matter anymore. You can win, but they still reserve the right to not show your video on the fyp - If you post a link, that can get your account banned completely. Not even a violation, just banned. “This is just crazy. This goes to, in fact, in effect September 13th. I think that's also when they're supposed to roll out the new TikTok for the United States. That'll probably have more rules than this one.”

Wall Street Apes

68,429 views • 11 months ago

🔥 Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH-BOMB on CNN that's so simple, even Abby Phillip can understand it: "In America every single day, there are children that cry when their mom or dad — who's an American citizen — breaks the law, gets arrested, and goes to jail." "There's no rioting or looting over that, because we understand that we're either a country of laws, or we are NOT a country of laws." "We separate them from their families! Because we judge them on the law...! Why is it different for illegal immigrants?!"
0:38

🔥 Ben Ferguson drops a TRUTH-BOMB on CNN that's so simple, even Abby Phillip can understand it: "In America every single day, there are children that cry when their mom or dad — who's an American citizen — breaks the law, gets arrested, and goes to jail." "There's no rioting or looting over that, because we understand that we're either a country of laws, or we are NOT a country of laws." "We separate them from their families! Because we judge them on the law...! Why is it different for illegal immigrants?!"

Townhall.com

864,606 views • 1 year ago

Trevor Philips, "You won fewer council seats than Labour, and fewer than the Liberal Democrats.. Is it morally right that what is now the third most popular party is squatting in Downing street?" Mark Harper, "I don't accept that analysis" Trevor Philips, "Former deputy chairman of the Conservative party Lee Anderson says Rishi Sunak could fly over the UK in his helicopter and drop £1 million in every person's chimney and they'd still vote him out. Has he got the mood of the nation right?" Mark Harper, "No, I don't think he's right at all" Trevor Philips, "Rishi Sunak's promise is not start the flights, not stop the boats. This week we saw the highest figure in channel crossings, ever. It's all going in the wrong direction for you" Mark Harper, "No, I don't accept that" Trevor Philips, "Well, that's a fact"
1:22

Trevor Philips, "You won fewer council seats than Labour, and fewer than the Liberal Democrats.. Is it morally right that what is now the third most popular party is squatting in Downing street?" Mark Harper, "I don't accept that analysis" Trevor Philips, "Former deputy chairman of the Conservative party Lee Anderson says Rishi Sunak could fly over the UK in his helicopter and drop £1 million in every person's chimney and they'd still vote him out. Has he got the mood of the nation right?" Mark Harper, "No, I don't think he's right at all" Trevor Philips, "Rishi Sunak's promise is not start the flights, not stop the boats. This week we saw the highest figure in channel crossings, ever. It's all going in the wrong direction for you" Mark Harper, "No, I don't accept that" Trevor Philips, "Well, that's a fact"

Farrukh

808,464 views • 2 years ago

We turned 240+ of the best-performing ads on the internet into a remix button for your brand. Ray-Ban. Dyson. Snickers. Ads that are proven, tested, and cost a fortune to make - now you can rebuild any of them on your brand in minutes. Today, Goose Ad Remixer is live. paste your URL → pick the winning ads → hit generate. the video shows the whole thing. no briefs. no designers. no agency turnaround. and no AI slop - you're remixing ads that already worked, not gambling on a prompt. your first 10 ads are free. go make them → (link in the first comment)
0:37

We turned 240+ of the best-performing ads on the internet into a remix button for your brand. Ray-Ban. Dyson. Snickers. Ads that are proven, tested, and cost a fortune to make - now you can rebuild any of them on your brand in minutes. Today, Goose Ad Remixer is live. paste your URL → pick the winning ads → hit generate. the video shows the whole thing. no briefs. no designers. no agency turnaround. and no AI slop - you're remixing ads that already worked, not gambling on a prompt. your first 10 ads are free. go make them → (link in the first comment)

Soham Mehta

48,351 views • 1 month ago

The ENTIRE crypto market is at ZERO and all of you are now BROKE. Stop lying to each other and scamming your friends on memecoins.. it’s time to make the transition over to making gambling a business for yourself. If you onboarded people into crypto, tell them to leave and onboard them into gambling, they have WAY HIGHER chances on making money (FACT). No more jerk circles and taking advise from people who have no results. Anyone hating in the comments is just scamming their friends to buy their stupid coins.
0:34

The ENTIRE crypto market is at ZERO and all of you are now BROKE. Stop lying to each other and scamming your friends on memecoins.. it’s time to make the transition over to making gambling a business for yourself. If you onboarded people into crypto, tell them to leave and onboard them into gambling, they have WAY HIGHER chances on making money (FACT). No more jerk circles and taking advise from people who have no results. Anyone hating in the comments is just scamming their friends to buy their stupid coins.

Ameer Hussain

20,580 views • 5 months ago

My thoughts on Brendan Sorsby… There’s no way he’s the only player struggling with gambling. I get it. The NCAA has to protect the integrity of the game. But this decision creates an unintended consequence. It tells every athlete dealing with a gambling problem to stay quiet. With more money in players’ pockets and sports betting more accessible than ever, gambling addiction isn’t going away. The real question is whether athletes feel safe asking for help before it costs them their career…or more. My fear is that 5-10 years from now, we’ll hear stories from former athletes who never got help until it was too late. What do we think?
0:44

My thoughts on Brendan Sorsby… There’s no way he’s the only player struggling with gambling. I get it. The NCAA has to protect the integrity of the game. But this decision creates an unintended consequence. It tells every athlete dealing with a gambling problem to stay quiet. With more money in players’ pockets and sports betting more accessible than ever, gambling addiction isn’t going away. The real question is whether athletes feel safe asking for help before it costs them their career…or more. My fear is that 5-10 years from now, we’ll hear stories from former athletes who never got help until it was too late. What do we think?

Max Browne

21,970 views • 1 month ago

Here it is: FEMA, under the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, spent more than a billion dollars to shelter illegal aliens in four-star hotels while Americans were being devastated by hurricanes. Now you ask, why hotels and not detention shelters? Border Czar Tom Homan: “No one ever talks about it. I’ll talk about it.” “Why did they release people into the interior of the United States rather than put them in an ICE bed? Why not place them in an empty ICE bed — $127 a night — instead of a hotel at $500 a night? The Biden administration did it on purpose. If you put them in an ICE detention bed, they get a hearing in 35 days. But if you release them and put them in a $500-a-night hotel room, their hearings could be five, seven, even nine years away.” In other words, after five, seven, or nine years, Democrats get to keep their voters — and in the meantime, we’ll just call it “disinformation.”
1:09

Here it is: FEMA, under the Biden–Harris terrorist administration, spent more than a billion dollars to shelter illegal aliens in four-star hotels while Americans were being devastated by hurricanes. Now you ask, why hotels and not detention shelters? Border Czar Tom Homan: “No one ever talks about it. I’ll talk about it.” “Why did they release people into the interior of the United States rather than put them in an ICE bed? Why not place them in an empty ICE bed — $127 a night — instead of a hotel at $500 a night? The Biden administration did it on purpose. If you put them in an ICE detention bed, they get a hearing in 35 days. But if you release them and put them in a $500-a-night hotel room, their hearings could be five, seven, even nine years away.” In other words, after five, seven, or nine years, Democrats get to keep their voters — and in the meantime, we’ll just call it “disinformation.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

47,347 views • 9 months ago