Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

‼️ CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS COMING ‼️ Every summer, without fail, the headlines become more hysterical. “Deadly heatwave.” “Killer heatwave.” “Danger to life.” You would think we were experiencing something unprecedented. The reality? The UK reaches temperatures of 30°C+ every single year. Hot summers are not a new phenomenon. Yet every... year the media ramps up the fear campaign and treats normal summer weather as though it’s an apocalyptic event. Now we’re even hearing discussions about businesses closing because it’s “too hot”. Think about that for a moment. Millions of people around the world live and work in temperatures far higher than this every day, yet we’re being told that 30 degrees in Britain is a national emergency. Instead of promoting common sense advice like staying hydrated, wearing appropriate clothing, seeking shade when necessary and checking on vulnerable people, we’re bombarded with sensationalist headlines designed to trigger fear. What’s even more ironic is that many of the people now terrified of the sun because the mainstream media told them to be are the exact same people who unquestioningly took experimental injections so they could board a plane and spend two weeks in countries where temperatures regularly hit 35°C, 40°C or even higher. If these temperatures are genuinely so dangerous, where are the warnings telling people not to fly to Spain, Greece, Turkey, Cyprus or Dubai? Why isn’t every travel company being accused of putting lives at risk? Why does the panic only seem to appear when those same temperatures happen here? The answer is simple: this isn’t about keeping people informed. It’s about conditioning people to associate weather with fear and to accept increasing levels of intervention and control as “necessary”. For years we’ve been told that climate change represents an existential emergency. Now we’re seeing the groundwork being laid for the next stage: restrictions justified in the name of saving the planet, protecting public health, or keeping people safe from the weather. Maybe that means travel restrictions. Maybe it means limits on energy use. Maybe it means businesses being forced to close. Maybe it means lockdown-style measures under a different name. People laughed when concerns about this were raised a few years ago. Today we’re already seeing conversations that would have sounded absurd not long ago. The biggest lesson from the last few years is that fear makes people surrender freedoms they would never normally give up. Question the headlines. Question the narrative. Question anyone who profits from keeping the public in a constant state of anxiety. The sun is not your enemy. And if climate lockdowns are what they’re preparing us for next, I for one won’t be complying!☀️ #staycoolshow more

Nazarin Veronica

66,160 subscribers

24,188 views • 28 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 SOMETHING IS OFF. MORGUES ARE FULL AND THE DEAD HAVE NOWHERE TO GO Paris is being hit by a brutal heatwave. Undertakers say they're overwhelmed. Families are reportedly struggling to find funeral services. Bodies are piling up faster than some services can handle them. Officials say it's simple. Just heat. Just another climate event. But many people aren't buying it. People from some of the hottest places on Earth are saying the same thing: This feels different. More oppressive. More relentless. More difficult to escape. Every year the temperatures break records. Every year the warnings become more alarming. Every year more people die. And every year we're told this is normal. Some people think we're being conditioned to accept a future of permanent extreme heat. Others think governments know something about what's coming that the public doesn't. And some are asking an even darker question. If heat and water shortages are becoming the biggest threat of the future, why are giant corporations racing to secure water supplies, build massive data centers, and buy up land near critical resources? What do they know about the future that they're not telling the public?

🚨 SOMETHING IS OFF. MORGUES ARE FULL AND THE DEAD HAVE NOWHERE TO GO Paris is being hit by a brutal heatwave. Undertakers say they're overwhelmed. Families are reportedly struggling to find funeral services. Bodies are piling up faster than some services can handle them. Officials say it's simple. Just heat. Just another climate event. But many people aren't buying it. People from some of the hottest places on Earth are saying the same thing: This feels different. More oppressive. More relentless. More difficult to escape. Every year the temperatures break records. Every year the warnings become more alarming. Every year more people die. And every year we're told this is normal. Some people think we're being conditioned to accept a future of permanent extreme heat. Others think governments know something about what's coming that the public doesn't. And some are asking an even darker question. If heat and water shortages are becoming the biggest threat of the future, why are giant corporations racing to secure water supplies, build massive data centers, and buy up land near critical resources? What do they know about the future that they're not telling the public?

HustleBitch

62,199 views • 19 days ago

$ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”$

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos: “You call them lunatics but the president just had this post where he says ‘we’re in discussions with a new and more reasonable regime’ – let me try to pin you down on that, who is this ‘new and more reasonable regime’? Is the United States in direct contact with them?” State Secretary Marco Rubio: “I’m not going to disclose to you who those people are, because it probably would get them in trouble with some other groups of people inside of Iran. Look, there’s some fractures going on there internally. And at the end of the day, I think that if there are people in Iran who now, given everything that’s happened, are willing to move in a different direction for their country, that would be great. Imagine in Iran that instead of spending their wealth, billions of dollars supporting terrorists or weapons, had spent that money helping the people of Iran, you’d have a much different country.” “So we are always hopeful that that would exist over there. It’s unfortunate, the people of Iran are incredible people. The people who lead them, this clerical regime, that is the problem. And if there are new people now in charge who have a more reasonable vision of the future, that would be good news for us, for them, for the entire world. But we also have to be prepared for the possibility, maybe even the probability, that that is not the case. So we’re gonna test it.” George Stephanopoulos: “But the president said they are, is that the case or is it not? I’m just trying to get some clarity on that.” Marco Rubio: “So you have people that are saying some of the right things privately. Obviously, they’re not going to put it out in press releases and what they say to you or put out there for the world doesn’t necessarily reflect what they’re saying in our conversations.”

RedWave Press

419,579 views • 3 months ago

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Neil Oliver: "Digital ID will never work as advertised, not only because keeping us safe is not... its intended function, but also... because too many people have learned that fundamental lesson of the last few years, which is to say it's never about what they say it's about." "Digital ID isn't about keeping us safe. It's about keeping us where they can see us. Where we can't move or do anything without permission in advance. Too many people see and understand, and this is why it won't work." "Too many have seen and understood that the motive behind the deliberate and cynical flooding of Britain, and of Europe, with people from outside... is designed primarily to create fear and division—fear and division that, as the oligarchs would have it, can only be fixed by digital ID for all." "Digital ID... won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe—safe from us." "Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be about making this country and the people living in it safe. But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place, and for this people." Credit: Neil Oliver

Wide Awake Media

48,382 views • 10 months ago

Me: I discuss in the book—it refers to the state where I know something, you know something, I know that you know it, you know that I know it, I know that you know that I know it, and so on ad infinitum. So it differs a bit from the conventional usage, which just refers to something that everyone knows. Here, everyone has to know that everyone knows. Times Radio Interviewer (Daniel Finkelstein Daniel Finkelstein): Can I use this with reference to the interview that I did yesterday with my brother? My brother’s a professor at City University; he’s president of the university, and there’s a campaign at the moment going on against one of their professors who was in the Israeli Defense Forces in the 1980s. We were having a discussion about how the university was standing up for the free speech of its staff, and I’d begun to wonder, as I went home reading your book on the tube, whether I’d made a big mistake—because the protest against this professor is really just a coordination exercise, isn’t it? And maybe I’d aided it by talking about it. Me: Oh yes—protests are coordination exercises. They’re designed to make private knowledge common knowledge. So, in a repressive regime, everyone may know that they despise the government, but because criticism of the government is punished, people might keep their opinions to themselves, with a result that they really don’t know what their fellow citizens think. Each one might think that they’re the only ones that are disgruntled, and so they can’t fear standing up to—they fear standing up to oppose the regime, because they can be picked off one at a time. If everyone were to protest at once, no government has the firepower to intimidate all its citizens at once. In a public protest, people can see other people there, and they know that the people there see other people there, and that can give them the strength and numbers to oppose the regime—sometimes by literally storming the palace, or sometimes just bringing the machinery of the state to a halt through work stoppages. But the crucial thing is that they are coordinated. They can only be coordinated if everyone knows that everyone knows that they hate the regime. Daniel Finkelstein: I suppose that social media is making people—is increasing the stock of common knowledge. We’re all much more aware of what other people like us, in particular like us, know, and we also know that other people know it, and so on, as you put it, and that makes people have more common knowledge. It’s not making us happier though; maybe we’d be better with less common knowledge? Me: Social media are making us more connected within certain circles—that is, those who are receiving the same texts and feeds that we are. It reduces the pool of, or shrinks the largest pool of common knowledge, namely the whole country, which may have been accessible in a day in which, say, in the United States there were three networks, or in Britain everyone was listening to the BBC. And yes, it probably doesn’t make us as happy, because when everything is public, it means that your reputation is on the line for anything you say or do. It means that since social media allow us to generate common knowledge, not just receive it like in the old days, it means that attacks on people’s reputation can be common knowledge, which means that it’s all the more painful for people on the receiving end of the attack. It may have something to do with the fact that in certain demographics—especially young people whose lives increasingly are online—that there’s that much more social competition, opportunities for gossip and ostracism and demeaning comments, and so on. When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Me: I discuss in the book—it refers to the state where I know something, you know something, I know that you know it, you know that I know it, I know that you know that I know it, and so on ad infinitum. So it differs a bit from the conventional usage, which just refers to something that everyone knows. Here, everyone has to know that everyone knows. Times Radio Interviewer (Daniel Finkelstein Daniel Finkelstein): Can I use this with reference to the interview that I did yesterday with my brother? My brother’s a professor at City University; he’s president of the university, and there’s a campaign at the moment going on against one of their professors who was in the Israeli Defense Forces in the 1980s. We were having a discussion about how the university was standing up for the free speech of its staff, and I’d begun to wonder, as I went home reading your book on the tube, whether I’d made a big mistake—because the protest against this professor is really just a coordination exercise, isn’t it? And maybe I’d aided it by talking about it. Me: Oh yes—protests are coordination exercises. They’re designed to make private knowledge common knowledge. So, in a repressive regime, everyone may know that they despise the government, but because criticism of the government is punished, people might keep their opinions to themselves, with a result that they really don’t know what their fellow citizens think. Each one might think that they’re the only ones that are disgruntled, and so they can’t fear standing up to—they fear standing up to oppose the regime, because they can be picked off one at a time. If everyone were to protest at once, no government has the firepower to intimidate all its citizens at once. In a public protest, people can see other people there, and they know that the people there see other people there, and that can give them the strength and numbers to oppose the regime—sometimes by literally storming the palace, or sometimes just bringing the machinery of the state to a halt through work stoppages. But the crucial thing is that they are coordinated. They can only be coordinated if everyone knows that everyone knows that they hate the regime. Daniel Finkelstein: I suppose that social media is making people—is increasing the stock of common knowledge. We’re all much more aware of what other people like us, in particular like us, know, and we also know that other people know it, and so on, as you put it, and that makes people have more common knowledge. It’s not making us happier though; maybe we’d be better with less common knowledge? Me: Social media are making us more connected within certain circles—that is, those who are receiving the same texts and feeds that we are. It reduces the pool of, or shrinks the largest pool of common knowledge, namely the whole country, which may have been accessible in a day in which, say, in the United States there were three networks, or in Britain everyone was listening to the BBC. And yes, it probably doesn’t make us as happy, because when everything is public, it means that your reputation is on the line for anything you say or do. It means that since social media allow us to generate common knowledge, not just receive it like in the old days, it means that attacks on people’s reputation can be common knowledge, which means that it’s all the more painful for people on the receiving end of the attack. It may have something to do with the fact that in certain demographics—especially young people whose lives increasingly are online—that there’s that much more social competition, opportunities for gossip and ostracism and demeaning comments, and so on. When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

21,547 views • 6 months ago

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️

This is for all the people in the arena ( your life, your career, your family ) who are doing it for them .. not for the validation of the crowd One of the great issues in our society right now is that people live their lives for outside validation, for the clicks, for the likes, for the followers, for the comments. This isn't just in social media. This is happening in the analog and real world too. Too many people are keeping up with the Joneses and worried about what people think about them. They worry about what people think about how much money they have, what school they go to, or even worse, what school their kids go to, and on and on and on … I will continue to make content with the hope it breaks someone out of the hamster wheel and that’s that ❤️❤️❤️❤️

Gary Vaynerchuk

19,794 views • 2 months ago

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

The most complicated challenge wasn’t stopping the migrants, or building the wall, or defunding the corrupt NGO’s. The most difficult challenge of this operation was showing the public that which has been hidden from them for many many years by a corrupt and treasonous mainstream media apparatus. ✅ The people had to see the drugs pouring over the border. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being bust all over the country. ✅ The people had to see the migrants being given privileges that even Americans don’t have ✅ The people had to see their hard earned dollars being robbed from them and given to people who came here illegally ✅ The people had to see them physically in their own cities, towns, and neighborhoods ✅ The people had to see a corrupt and treasonous judiciary system that would encourage criminal migrants to embed themselves within our country and sow chaos & crime Like it or not that is what the last four years were all about. And now you are seeing the results of the operation. Now you are seeing that public opinion, by CNN‘s own admission, is in Donald Trump‘s favor: “ no matter which way you cut it, the American public is with the Republicans, the American public is with Donald Trump to a much greater extent than they were in term number one. And it’s not just on the broad issue of immigration, it’s on the specifics as well, in which the American public is with Donald Trump and the Republicans. And that is why Donald Trump is eager to take on this fight.” 👉And that is why you are seeing the military begin to step in and clean up the mess. It is always been about manufacturing. The people‘s consent for those things which must be done. 🎥 Video Credit: @LatinosWithTrump

NewsTreason Channel 17

17,130 views • 1 year ago

We are in Full Control and Always have been People find this hard to accept yet all it takes is to look into the technology we had access to many years ago and imagine what we have access to now Snowden the movie shows what The CIA, US Military and NSA were/are capable of This was back when George Bush was President - all it takes is common sense to understand that every criminal around the world from the highest levels were being monitored. They know everything hence the phrase. We Have it All Those who keep talking about the elites and doubt the US Military must watch this movie, people are choosing to moan for the sake of it and put out fear regularly Trust that there is so much more good people in this world and what we are witnessing now has already taken place allowing us to catch up and accept what is about to be revealed when it all starts coming out at once Edward Snowden is a hero Edward Snowden #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #edwardnowden #q #maga

We are in Full Control and Always have been People find this hard to accept yet all it takes is to look into the technology we had access to many years ago and imagine what we have access to now Snowden the movie shows what The CIA, US Military and NSA were/are capable of This was back when George Bush was President - all it takes is common sense to understand that every criminal around the world from the highest levels were being monitored. They know everything hence the phrase. We Have it All Those who keep talking about the elites and doubt the US Military must watch this movie, people are choosing to moan for the sake of it and put out fear regularly Trust that there is so much more good people in this world and what we are witnessing now has already taken place allowing us to catch up and accept what is about to be revealed when it all starts coming out at once Edward Snowden is a hero Edward Snowden #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #edwardnowden #q #maga

Harry The Soul Coach

14,696 views • 10 months ago

The antisemitism that was festering under the surface for decades, has exploded. And for those of us who stand against it, we are not the popular kids. The so called “cool kids” are wearing a keffiyeh, calling for an intifada and demanding a Palestine between the river and the sea even if they can’t tell you which river or which sea. Keffiyeh Karens. That’s the mainstream now. Standing up against jihadism is now the counter-culture. Standing up for western democratic values against terror and extremism: that is now the counter-culture. Using facts and reason and knowing history: that is now the counter-culture. People! WE are the counterculture. And we are doing it. The Jewish people have found our voice because standing up for what we believe in, even when it’s not popular, is part of who we are. Our tiny people haven’t survived for millennia and outlived every empire that tried to destroy us by always being the cool kids. In fact, we almost never are. We know when it’s time to swim against the tide because we know this playbook. We have been here before. And our message to the world is as follows: the hatred that targets is targeting you too. I have a question for you, keffiyeh Karen from campus: where would you prefer to be a woman? in Iran? In Afghanistan? or in Israel? We cannot take the freedoms that we enjoy here in the US in Israel and in the west for granted, and right now even saying just that is swimming against the tide – it is being the counterculture. This is not a war of Israel’s choosing but we cannot avoid it either. They might call us the chosen people: in fact we are the people with no choice. But the entire western world needs to wake up to the fact that it has no choice either: that what is at stake is the survival, not just of the Jewish people, but of Western civilization, democracy and freedom itself. And where we do have a choice is in how we do it: and we choose to speak the truth, even when the truth isn’t popular. To speak up, even when we are shouted down and to be proud even when they tell us we better hide. Thank you so much, am Israel chai

The antisemitism that was festering under the surface for decades, has exploded. And for those of us who stand against it, we are not the popular kids. The so called “cool kids” are wearing a keffiyeh, calling for an intifada and demanding a Palestine between the river and the sea even if they can’t tell you which river or which sea. Keffiyeh Karens. That’s the mainstream now. Standing up against jihadism is now the counter-culture. Standing up for western democratic values against terror and extremism: that is now the counter-culture. Using facts and reason and knowing history: that is now the counter-culture. People! WE are the counterculture. And we are doing it. The Jewish people have found our voice because standing up for what we believe in, even when it’s not popular, is part of who we are. Our tiny people haven’t survived for millennia and outlived every empire that tried to destroy us by always being the cool kids. In fact, we almost never are. We know when it’s time to swim against the tide because we know this playbook. We have been here before. And our message to the world is as follows: the hatred that targets is targeting you too. I have a question for you, keffiyeh Karen from campus: where would you prefer to be a woman? in Iran? In Afghanistan? or in Israel? We cannot take the freedoms that we enjoy here in the US in Israel and in the west for granted, and right now even saying just that is swimming against the tide – it is being the counterculture. This is not a war of Israel’s choosing but we cannot avoid it either. They might call us the chosen people: in fact we are the people with no choice. But the entire western world needs to wake up to the fact that it has no choice either: that what is at stake is the survival, not just of the Jewish people, but of Western civilization, democracy and freedom itself. And where we do have a choice is in how we do it: and we choose to speak the truth, even when the truth isn’t popular. To speak up, even when we are shouted down and to be proud even when they tell us we better hide. Thank you so much, am Israel chai

Noa Tishby

349,742 views • 1 year ago

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Zack Polanski, "The problem is chaining yourself to an economic system that is so fundamentally broken" "You don't get marks or points for just being good, a gold star for doing the basics, or even just under the necessary" "We are at this urgent moment in our history where the only thing that is acceptable is what is required" "What is required is to reduce our emissions, to invest in climate adaptation, to protect nature in one of the most nature depleted countries in the world" "And to make sure we're reinvigorating communities with the truth and putting them in charge" "What is the biggest tool we have?" "It is our shared humanity" "Tackling the cost of living crisis is the same solution as tackling the climate crisis" "It's so vital at this budget that we're cutting bills and taxing billionaires" "There's an implication that all of this is transactional, and the only thing people care about is the money in their pockets" "If you're struggling, that probably is the only thing you care about" "But for so many people, they care about the future of this planet. About clean air. Green spaces" "That when people go to work they have a shared sense of purpose, that it is meaningful and that they are contributing something to society" "We are in a crisis. Climate. Equality. Air pollution. Identity. All of these problems are all interlinked" "And it all comes down to our communities and our humanity"

Farrukh

205,108 views • 8 months ago

One of the most significant conversations I had in Red Deer was not with a longtime political activist, a public figure, or someone who lives and breathes this stuff every day. It was with ordinary Albertans who told me they had never really been involved in politics before. They said they had never canvassed. Never stepped forward publicly like this. Never imagined they would be out on the side of the road waving flags and speaking openly about Alberta independence. And yet there they were. That matters. It matters because movements do not become real when the loudest voices get louder. They become real when regular people, people who used to stay out of politics entirely, start feeling that the situation has become too important to ignore. That is what I think this moment represents. These were not people looking for a hobby or some political tribe to join. They were people who felt that Alberta may be staring at a rare window of opportunity, and that if we let it slip through our fingers, we may never get another one like it again. That is a very different kind of energy. It is one thing for committed independence supporters to keep making the case year after year. It is another thing entirely when people who were never engaged before begin to say: This is our chance. We cannot waste it. We may not get another one. That tells me the movement is moving beyond its old boundaries. It also helps explain why this issue hits so deeply for so many families. A lot of these people are not motivated by abstract theory. They are thinking about their kids, their grandkids, their cost of living, their ability to build a future here, and whether Alberta will remain a place where ordinary people can still prosper and live with a sense of freedom and dignity. When people like that start showing up, it means the issue has become personal. And once something becomes personal, it gets much harder for the political class to dismiss it as fringe. That may be the deeper significance of what is happening. The independence movement is no longer just being carried by the usual voices. It is pulling in people who had almost given up on politics entirely. People who had tuned out. People who thought nothing would ever change. People who are now saying that maybe this is the moment when Albertans finally have to stop waiting for Ottawa to fix things and start taking responsibility for their own future. Agree or disagree with them, that is not something to laugh off. That is a sign of a population beginning to wake up. And when ordinary people start believing that this may be their last real chance to change the direction of their province, that is when movements become powerful. That is when they stop being theoretical. That is when they become hard to ignore.

One of the most significant conversations I had in Red Deer was not with a longtime political activist, a public figure, or someone who lives and breathes this stuff every day. It was with ordinary Albertans who told me they had never really been involved in politics before. They said they had never canvassed. Never stepped forward publicly like this. Never imagined they would be out on the side of the road waving flags and speaking openly about Alberta independence. And yet there they were. That matters. It matters because movements do not become real when the loudest voices get louder. They become real when regular people, people who used to stay out of politics entirely, start feeling that the situation has become too important to ignore. That is what I think this moment represents. These were not people looking for a hobby or some political tribe to join. They were people who felt that Alberta may be staring at a rare window of opportunity, and that if we let it slip through our fingers, we may never get another one like it again. That is a very different kind of energy. It is one thing for committed independence supporters to keep making the case year after year. It is another thing entirely when people who were never engaged before begin to say: This is our chance. We cannot waste it. We may not get another one. That tells me the movement is moving beyond its old boundaries. It also helps explain why this issue hits so deeply for so many families. A lot of these people are not motivated by abstract theory. They are thinking about their kids, their grandkids, their cost of living, their ability to build a future here, and whether Alberta will remain a place where ordinary people can still prosper and live with a sense of freedom and dignity. When people like that start showing up, it means the issue has become personal. And once something becomes personal, it gets much harder for the political class to dismiss it as fringe. That may be the deeper significance of what is happening. The independence movement is no longer just being carried by the usual voices. It is pulling in people who had almost given up on politics entirely. People who had tuned out. People who thought nothing would ever change. People who are now saying that maybe this is the moment when Albertans finally have to stop waiting for Ottawa to fix things and start taking responsibility for their own future. Agree or disagree with them, that is not something to laugh off. That is a sign of a population beginning to wake up. And when ordinary people start believing that this may be their last real chance to change the direction of their province, that is when movements become powerful. That is when they stop being theoretical. That is when they become hard to ignore.

Jon Alberta Patriot

17,542 views • 3 months ago

Emily Blunt on the plot of Disclosure Day “What can you tell us about the plot of the movie itself?” “The big idea of it is that question that sparked the fires of human imagination for years. Are we alone or are we not alone? And if we aren't, why are the people in power hiding the truth from us? And so the movie is like a life or death race against time for those that believe the truth belongs to 8 billion people and those who believe that it doesn't and they want to keep it secret.”

Emily Blunt on the plot of Disclosure Day “What can you tell us about the plot of the movie itself?” “The big idea of it is that question that sparked the fires of human imagination for years. Are we alone or are we not alone? And if we aren't, why are the people in power hiding the truth from us? And so the movie is like a life or death race against time for those that believe the truth belongs to 8 billion people and those who believe that it doesn't and they want to keep it secret.”

Red Panda Koala

195,682 views • 1 month ago

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Angelina Jolie Has Finally Woken Up To The Fact The United Nations & Governments Are Run By Heartless Criminals There’s No Accountability For Crimes “If There’s A Business Interest Involved” “That is the biggest that is the most disheartening thing of I think we we or I thought at least even 20 years ago when I started to work internationally that there was this I in my head, some weird idea of good guys. You know? Some idea of those whether it be certain countries or certain people's maybe it was this holdover from World War 2 and this thought that this was, like so that the lines were clear and that there was going to be these human rights goals laid out and that there would be things stood up for, and that if these things weren't done, there would be pushback, and these were the and I really thought that's what it was. I even thought that's what the United Nations was… And I thought, okay. There's a there's some lines in the sand. There's some understanding. We're gonna grow and fight for improvements in these areas. And and to watch to watch and understand more and more how it's just simply that's not what it is. That's not the world. The world is not these are human rights. It is these are human rights sometimes for these people, maybe sometimes for these people, never for these people. Yeah. It's food aid, 6% for these people, 50% for these people, it's justice for these people, but not these people. Accountability for this crime, but not that crime if there's business interest. And this is truly the ugly state of of so much of the world that we are just becoming more and more aware of for just about every I mean, I don't know any countries that are are clean of it and, um, and willing to hold a line really consistently hand on behalf of the of human rights and laws”

Wall Street Apes

658,682 views • 2 years ago

More Optics, more eyes on Keir Starmer announces a social media ban in the UK for under 16s This is more optics, parents and children are now in the loop This is not just an idea of hay popped up and made by Keir, this was always going to happen. Keir is a character in the pantomine, doing exactly what Joe Biden did in America, snapping people out of the sleepy state by being a calamity Something big is about to drop and we need as many as possible paying attention, something that many would choose to ignore, yet something all MUST know. That is the Rape Gang Inquiry report People also have to understand that a lot of people are about to be exposed and the children do not need to see all of the crimes that many of their loved ones are involved with This is why social media would ruin their lives The UK is full of wrongens that are about to be shown to the world #harrythesoulcoach #keirstarmer #unitedkingdom #socialmediaban #truth

More Optics, more eyes on Keir Starmer announces a social media ban in the UK for under 16s This is more optics, parents and children are now in the loop This is not just an idea of hay popped up and made by Keir, this was always going to happen. Keir is a character in the pantomine, doing exactly what Joe Biden did in America, snapping people out of the sleepy state by being a calamity Something big is about to drop and we need as many as possible paying attention, something that many would choose to ignore, yet something all MUST know. That is the Rape Gang Inquiry report People also have to understand that a lot of people are about to be exposed and the children do not need to see all of the crimes that many of their loved ones are involved with This is why social media would ruin their lives The UK is full of wrongens that are about to be shown to the world #harrythesoulcoach #keirstarmer #unitedkingdom #socialmediaban #truth

Harry The Soul Coach

17,459 views • 1 month ago

Steve Jobs on how to build a great brand After re-joining Apple in 1996, Steve Jobs announced the “Think different” campaign with the following statement: “To me, marketing is about values. This is a very complicated and noisy world. We’re not going to get a chance to get people to remember much about us. No company is. So we have to be really clear on what we want them to know about us.” He cites Nike as one of the greatest jobs of marketing the universe has ever seen: “Remember, Nike sells a commodity—they sell shoes! And yet when you think of Nike, you feel something different than a shoe company. In their ads, they don’t ever talk about the product. They don’t ever tell you about their air soles and why they are better than Reebok’s air soles. What does Nike do in their advertising? They honor great athletes, and they honor great athletics. That’s who they are, that’s what they are about.” Marketing guru Seth Godin also used Nike as an example of great branding in a blog post a few years ago: “If Nike announced that they were opening a hotel, you’d have a pretty good guess about what it would be like. But if Hyatt announced that they were going to start making shoes, you would have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what those shoes would be like. That’s because Nike owns a brand and Hyatt simply owns real estate.” Jobs goes on to explain how the Apple team arrived at the “Think Different” campaign: “Our customers want to know who is Apple and what is it that we stand for. Where do we fit in this world? What we’re about isn’t making boxes for people to get their jobs done—although we do that well. We do that better than almost anybody, in some cases. But Apple is about something more than that. Apple at the core—its core value—is that we believe people with passion can change the world for the better… And that those people who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world are the ones who actually do.” He continues: “And so, what we’re going to do in our first brand marketing campaign in several years is to get back to that core value. A lot of things have changed. The market is in a totally different place than it was a decade ago, and Apple is totally different… the products and the distribution strategy and the manufacturing are totally different. And we understand that. But values and core values—those things shouldn’t change. The things that Apple believed in, at its core, are the same things that Apple really stands for today.” Apple’s “Think Different” campaign was designed to honor those people who have changed the world. And as Jobs so eloquently put it: “Some of them are living. Some of them are not. But the ones that aren’t, you’ll know that if they ever used a computer, it would’ve been a Mac. The theme of the campaign is ‘Think Different.’ It’s honoring the people who think different and who move this world forward. And it is what we are about. It touches the soul of this company.” If you’re looking to create a great brand, I’d start out by asking: what are your core values and what does your company honor?

Startup Archive

338,071 views • 2 years ago

NY State Senator Erik Bottcher: "Pride feels different right now. And what I'm hearing more and more is: 'Why do we need Pride? Why do you need to make it all about yourselves? Why are you talking about it so much? Why do you need a Pride Month at all?' And the best way to put it is: Pride is the opposite of shame. And shame is a kind of being that every one of us has known since the minute that we realized that we were different. It is a sharp pain, shame, and there are people who want us to continue feeling shame. They think we should be ashamed. That has been true, Mr. President, for thousands of years. Thousands of years of persecution. We've been hunted down. Attacked. Murdered. Jailed. I think about the countless people throughout history who have had to live loveless lives. Think about that for a minute. Think about the person that you love most in the world -- your spouse, a person that you couldn't live without -- and now imagine being told that you couldn't talk to them again. And if you were seen holding their hand, you would be put in jail and they would throw away the key. That's been happening for thousands of years, and it is happening in the world right now."

NY State Senator Erik Bottcher: "Pride feels different right now. And what I'm hearing more and more is: 'Why do we need Pride? Why do you need to make it all about yourselves? Why are you talking about it so much? Why do you need a Pride Month at all?' And the best way to put it is: Pride is the opposite of shame. And shame is a kind of being that every one of us has known since the minute that we realized that we were different. It is a sharp pain, shame, and there are people who want us to continue feeling shame. They think we should be ashamed. That has been true, Mr. President, for thousands of years. Thousands of years of persecution. We've been hunted down. Attacked. Murdered. Jailed. I think about the countless people throughout history who have had to live loveless lives. Think about that for a minute. Think about the person that you love most in the world -- your spouse, a person that you couldn't live without -- and now imagine being told that you couldn't talk to them again. And if you were seen holding their hand, you would be put in jail and they would throw away the key. That's been happening for thousands of years, and it is happening in the world right now."

Breitbart News

28,694 views • 1 month ago

The media will not talk about this so X needs to be the leader yet again. Have you heard about Port Washington, Wisconsin? That town has about 12,000 population and were presented with an 'issue' if you will from a big company. They want to build a data center for AI. The people OBJECTED to it for many reasons. The local government there gave the people a big middle finger and decided to proceed anyway. This situation is yet another example of either big or small, the people are sick of the government not working for them and being told to shut up and deal with things.

The media will not talk about this so X needs to be the leader yet again. Have you heard about Port Washington, Wisconsin? That town has about 12,000 population and were presented with an 'issue' if you will from a big company. They want to build a data center for AI. The people OBJECTED to it for many reasons. The local government there gave the people a big middle finger and decided to proceed anyway. This situation is yet another example of either big or small, the people are sick of the government not working for them and being told to shut up and deal with things.

AmericanPapaBear™

145,152 views • 6 months ago

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 views • 6 months ago