Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Clinton Foundation Whistleblower Larry Doyle: Background info re engagement w/IRS CI (Criminal Investigation) early 2019 prior to obstruction via Weaponization of USG agencies. We have TWO cases ongoing in US Tax Court: Dockets 4865-19W, 4350-24W Pls Share this and attached 🧵👇🏻

CFWBers's profile picture

Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers

41,181 subscribers

66,219 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Clinton Foundation Whistleblower Larry Doyle: “The public has a right to know in re ‘ The Biggest Scam Ever’ so we can pursue real accountability and #SaveAmerica”. Please Share Elon Musk DOGE IRS Department of Government Efficiency
1:59

Clinton Foundation Whistleblower Larry Doyle: “The public has a right to know in re ‘ The Biggest Scam Ever’ so we can pursue real accountability and #SaveAmerica”. Please Share Elon Musk DOGE IRS Department of Government Efficiency

Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers

1,200,406 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 EXPOSED: Clinton Foundation's DIRTY Secrets UNRAVELED in Bombshell Leaks! 🚨 IRS & FBI Probes SHUT DOWN to Protect Hillary's Pay-to-Play Empire? You Won't Believe the Cover-Ups! Folks, the floodgates are OPEN! Thanks to whistleblowers + declassifications by Kash Patel & Pam Bondi, John Solomon just dropped MEGA docs implicating the Clintons BIG TIME: 🔥 2016 FBI Nightmare: Declassified timeline shows Obama DOJ’s “SHUT IT DOWN” order on THREE FBI probes into Clinton Foundation’s pay-to-play scams! – Foreign gov’ts funneled MILLIONS for State Dept favors while Hillary was boss. – Agents in NYC, Little Rock & DC had SOLID leads. – Andrew McCabe & Sally Yates KILLED it pre-election. Kid gloves for Clintons, brass knuckles for Trump! 🔥 2019 IRS Bombshell: Criminal tax probe LAUNCHED after whistleblowers John Moynihan & Larry Doyle exposed the Foundation as a “FRAUDULENT ENTERPRISE”! – Acting as foreign agent – Tax evasion – Commingling Bill & Hillary’s personal cash with “charity” funds – Raking in $2.8B! IRS was READY to roll, even called it a full fraud... then SUDDEN STOP. “Can’t talk about CF anymore.” Excuse? “No resources.” (Same IRS that targeted conservatives!) Pure protection racket for Dem elites! 🔥 Comey Redactions REVEALED: Unmasked memos show ex-FBI chief’s secret media mole, Daniel Richman, leaking to NYT to shape Russia hoax & force Mueller probe—ALL to shield Clintons? Comey’s lieutenants (Strzok, Page) briefed press, ignored evidence against Hillary’s emails. Govt HAD tons of dirt but REFUSED to pursue! This is the SMOKING GUN on how the swamp protected the Clintons from justice! 👀 Grand conspiracy probe incoming? ⚡ Share if you’re SHOCKED—we’re finally seeing the TRUTH!
2:37

🚨 EXPOSED: Clinton Foundation's DIRTY Secrets UNRAVELED in Bombshell Leaks! 🚨 IRS & FBI Probes SHUT DOWN to Protect Hillary's Pay-to-Play Empire? You Won't Believe the Cover-Ups! Folks, the floodgates are OPEN! Thanks to whistleblowers + declassifications by Kash Patel & Pam Bondi, John Solomon just dropped MEGA docs implicating the Clintons BIG TIME: 🔥 2016 FBI Nightmare: Declassified timeline shows Obama DOJ’s “SHUT IT DOWN” order on THREE FBI probes into Clinton Foundation’s pay-to-play scams! – Foreign gov’ts funneled MILLIONS for State Dept favors while Hillary was boss. – Agents in NYC, Little Rock & DC had SOLID leads. – Andrew McCabe & Sally Yates KILLED it pre-election. Kid gloves for Clintons, brass knuckles for Trump! 🔥 2019 IRS Bombshell: Criminal tax probe LAUNCHED after whistleblowers John Moynihan & Larry Doyle exposed the Foundation as a “FRAUDULENT ENTERPRISE”! – Acting as foreign agent – Tax evasion – Commingling Bill & Hillary’s personal cash with “charity” funds – Raking in $2.8B! IRS was READY to roll, even called it a full fraud... then SUDDEN STOP. “Can’t talk about CF anymore.” Excuse? “No resources.” (Same IRS that targeted conservatives!) Pure protection racket for Dem elites! 🔥 Comey Redactions REVEALED: Unmasked memos show ex-FBI chief’s secret media mole, Daniel Richman, leaking to NYT to shape Russia hoax & force Mueller probe—ALL to shield Clintons? Comey’s lieutenants (Strzok, Page) briefed press, ignored evidence against Hillary’s emails. Govt HAD tons of dirt but REFUSED to pursue! This is the SMOKING GUN on how the swamp protected the Clintons from justice! 👀 Grand conspiracy probe incoming? ⚡ Share if you’re SHOCKED—we’re finally seeing the TRUTH!

Project Constitution

64,643 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Very Imp: Must read this post and share GenZ have seen only Modi era, they are not aware what was India before Modi I will share three cases with you that will leave you with both tears and anger Case 1 IK Gujral became PM of India in 1997 with the support of Congress, and as he became PM, he shared list of all RAW agents (CIT-X and CIT-J) working in Pakistan with the Pakistan govt and stopped all intelligence operations in Pakistan. ISI killed all our brave RAW agents. Just after this, Pakistan carried out Kargil Proof: Video attached Case 2 During 1990-92, IFS officer Hamid Ansari was the ambassador in Iran. He shared details of all RAW agents working in Iran to Iran regime. All RAW agents were arrested, tortured and killed. Hamid Ansari completely destroyed RAW set up in Gulf Just after it, Mumbai blast happened Congress rewarded Ansari in 2007 and made him Vice President of India and made him again in 2012 Proof: documents attached in Post 2/3 Case 3 In 2007, a bomb blast happened in Samjhauta Express. Indian agencies arrested a Pakistani man Ajmat Ali for this blast but Manmohan Singh govt of that time released him and secretly sent him back to Pakistan and in place of him arrested 4-5 innocent Hindus and declared it Hindu Terrorism. In 2009, US agency confirmed that Samjhauta express blast was carried out by Pakistan and LeT terrorist Arif Qasmani was mastermind of it Even after that Congress govt didn't acquit those innocent Hindus. A special court acquitted all those innocent Hindus in March 2019 Proof: documents attached in post 3/3 This was the India before Modi You was allowed to do anything on name of Secularism and for Muslim appeasement 1/3
1:01

Very Imp: Must read this post and share GenZ have seen only Modi era, they are not aware what was India before Modi I will share three cases with you that will leave you with both tears and anger Case 1 IK Gujral became PM of India in 1997 with the support of Congress, and as he became PM, he shared list of all RAW agents (CIT-X and CIT-J) working in Pakistan with the Pakistan govt and stopped all intelligence operations in Pakistan. ISI killed all our brave RAW agents. Just after this, Pakistan carried out Kargil Proof: Video attached Case 2 During 1990-92, IFS officer Hamid Ansari was the ambassador in Iran. He shared details of all RAW agents working in Iran to Iran regime. All RAW agents were arrested, tortured and killed. Hamid Ansari completely destroyed RAW set up in Gulf Just after it, Mumbai blast happened Congress rewarded Ansari in 2007 and made him Vice President of India and made him again in 2012 Proof: documents attached in Post 2/3 Case 3 In 2007, a bomb blast happened in Samjhauta Express. Indian agencies arrested a Pakistani man Ajmat Ali for this blast but Manmohan Singh govt of that time released him and secretly sent him back to Pakistan and in place of him arrested 4-5 innocent Hindus and declared it Hindu Terrorism. In 2009, US agency confirmed that Samjhauta express blast was carried out by Pakistan and LeT terrorist Arif Qasmani was mastermind of it Even after that Congress govt didn't acquit those innocent Hindus. A special court acquitted all those innocent Hindus in March 2019 Proof: documents attached in post 3/3 This was the India before Modi You was allowed to do anything on name of Secularism and for Muslim appeasement 1/3

STAR Boy TARUN

91,144 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Video! Leaked Government Documents Reveal Massive Election Cover-Up in Utah! Suspecting huge problems with the 2024 gubernatorial election, Just Phil Lyman and I have been on the hunt for more information and transparency. The AG told Michael Clara and the 3rd District Court that the documents revealing a criminal investigation into Governor Cox’s nomination petitions that Michael requested did not exist. But they do! A whistleblower leaked this document to us. Two other hidden documents have also been revealed including an outside audit done by State Auditor John Dougall and the nomination petitions for Senator Don Ipson. Senator Ipson hired the same company that Cox had hired to gather signatures and these packets show that forged signatures rejected on Ipson's packets were accepted as valid on Cox's! The information revealed in these 3 hidden documents is shocking!! There was a reason why Lt. Gov. Deidre M. Henderson and AG Derek Brown kept these documents from us and the people of Utah. Our elections are critical and determine the type of leadership we have in our state and the policies they implement. The people in Utah deserve to have clean elections and to be able to trust the electoral process! And there must be accountability for those who break this trust. #utpol
7:03

Video! Leaked Government Documents Reveal Massive Election Cover-Up in Utah! Suspecting huge problems with the 2024 gubernatorial election, Just Phil Lyman and I have been on the hunt for more information and transparency. The AG told Michael Clara and the 3rd District Court that the documents revealing a criminal investigation into Governor Cox’s nomination petitions that Michael requested did not exist. But they do! A whistleblower leaked this document to us. Two other hidden documents have also been revealed including an outside audit done by State Auditor John Dougall and the nomination petitions for Senator Don Ipson. Senator Ipson hired the same company that Cox had hired to gather signatures and these packets show that forged signatures rejected on Ipson's packets were accepted as valid on Cox's! The information revealed in these 3 hidden documents is shocking!! There was a reason why Lt. Gov. Deidre M. Henderson and AG Derek Brown kept these documents from us and the people of Utah. Our elections are critical and determine the type of leadership we have in our state and the policies they implement. The people in Utah deserve to have clean elections and to be able to trust the electoral process! And there must be accountability for those who break this trust. #utpol

Natalie Clawson

16,486 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

THE CLINTONS ARE PRIMARY FOCUS TO EPSTEIN SUBPOENAS and could lead to more crimes against Obama, Barr, and others as Comer plans to go all the way back to the beginning of the Obama administration and the early 2000s. Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island and who all participated in crimes against children. Bill and Hillary are both now the prime focus of the investigation into Epstein and were frequent visitors to the Island with Bill Clinton being confirmed to have been on the Lolita Express and flight logs 26-28 times with numerous visits to the infamous island. The reason this is so important and unlike anything ever before is that none of these people have every been questioned and summoned to the hill for this type of investigation. Another huge factor is that Republicans and Democrats both want answers. We need to come to a point and stop focusing on "sides" and start looking at the actual crimes, the evil actions themselves. I think we can all agree that anyone who hurts children should be in prison. Most importantly, what nobody seems to understand, is that the Clintons and others will all be questioned about all of their activities and connections with Epstein and others all the way back to the beginning of the Obama administration. Do you understand what this means? This includes Everything tied to The Russia Collusion Hoax and back. All of the Clinton emails, Benghazi, The Anthony Weiner laptop, the Clinton Foundation and connections to Haiti, pay to play politics, crimes against children, child trafficking and if Epstein played a role in the Clinton Foundation when it came to acquiring these children and everyone else involved. This is the skeleton key to open up every door in order to tie everything together to complete the big picture. Do you really believe that the National Guard, the FBI, the DEA, ICE, U.S. Marshalls and other agencies are all in D.C. just for the public safety, right when subpoenas, criminal investigations, and indictments are about to drop? No. They are here to clean out D.C. How else do you move in the military for operations against the deep state without setting off alarm bells? Do you think their going to tell you up front or publicly? Bill and Hillary Clinton will also not have immunity and could face prison. They have been building bullet proof cases on these people for years so when the trigger is finally pulled, there will be no way out but prison. Justice is coming. Prepare for many to go missing or to end up "suic*ded." The next step is to tie up loose ends. The U.S. Federal Courts and sealed indictments, and witness database did not get hacked for nothing. They are worried because they know their time is up.
6:03

THE CLINTONS ARE PRIMARY FOCUS TO EPSTEIN SUBPOENAS and could lead to more crimes against Obama, Barr, and others as Comer plans to go all the way back to the beginning of the Obama administration and the early 2000s. Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island and who all participated in crimes against children. Bill and Hillary are both now the prime focus of the investigation into Epstein and were frequent visitors to the Island with Bill Clinton being confirmed to have been on the Lolita Express and flight logs 26-28 times with numerous visits to the infamous island. The reason this is so important and unlike anything ever before is that none of these people have every been questioned and summoned to the hill for this type of investigation. Another huge factor is that Republicans and Democrats both want answers. We need to come to a point and stop focusing on "sides" and start looking at the actual crimes, the evil actions themselves. I think we can all agree that anyone who hurts children should be in prison. Most importantly, what nobody seems to understand, is that the Clintons and others will all be questioned about all of their activities and connections with Epstein and others all the way back to the beginning of the Obama administration. Do you understand what this means? This includes Everything tied to The Russia Collusion Hoax and back. All of the Clinton emails, Benghazi, The Anthony Weiner laptop, the Clinton Foundation and connections to Haiti, pay to play politics, crimes against children, child trafficking and if Epstein played a role in the Clinton Foundation when it came to acquiring these children and everyone else involved. This is the skeleton key to open up every door in order to tie everything together to complete the big picture. Do you really believe that the National Guard, the FBI, the DEA, ICE, U.S. Marshalls and other agencies are all in D.C. just for the public safety, right when subpoenas, criminal investigations, and indictments are about to drop? No. They are here to clean out D.C. How else do you move in the military for operations against the deep state without setting off alarm bells? Do you think their going to tell you up front or publicly? Bill and Hillary Clinton will also not have immunity and could face prison. They have been building bullet proof cases on these people for years so when the trigger is finally pulled, there will be no way out but prison. Justice is coming. Prepare for many to go missing or to end up "suic*ded." The next step is to tie up loose ends. The U.S. Federal Courts and sealed indictments, and witness database did not get hacked for nothing. They are worried because they know their time is up.

The SCIF

50,393 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨PROSECUTING THE GRAND CONSPIRACY THE PERPETRATORS WILL NOT BE LET OFF THE HOOK KASH PATEL: Coming back to Russiagate, where I was the lead investigator on Capitol Hill, exposing the FISA abuse, the weaponization, the FBI lies, to a secret court, to illegally and unlawfully surveilling a political opponent. Yes, that happened with information they basically made up from overseas. So the way that we ensure public trust is to make sure that it never happens again. That's step one. Step two, accountability and transparency. So what we are doing, especially with our deep knowledge of what happened in Russiagate, is two things on a parallel track. Congress. Oversight. I'm committed to congressional oversight. My predecessors turned over, Comey, 3,000 pages to Congress in his three years in change, and Chris Wray turned over 13,000 in his almost seven years. In my nine months, we've turned over 40,000 pages of material to Congress. Not just Russiagate, Arctic Frost, but so many other things that they're interested in. We're going to continue doing that. Because I believe, as a senior staffer on the Hill, that's the best way to expose the information to the public and say, here, you read it, and you tell us what your feedback is. In this very building, there were rooms that were hidden away from the map site of the building, and nobody had access into them. And once we got into those rooms, we found more information related to the Russiagate hoax from prior FBI leadership. And that was in burn bags that they wanted to have destroyed, but for whatever reason, no one ever got around to it, or they thought we would just never find it. So we have multiple teams. We've built squads for both Russiagate and Arctic Frost, and we're using a grand jury process and we're issuing, I think we're up to like 75 or 100 subpoenas already, for witnesses. That's what you target first. We also have targets of our investigation, people we think committed acts of criminal conduct. And this, in my opinion, is why the media is going so hog-wild over the Comey prosecution. Notice how they're not attacking the evidence. They're just saying, oh, so-and-so was improperly appointed. That to me shows me we're over the target. That was just step one. LARA: So you still have open investigations into these people. You're still looking into what ultimately happened with them. So do you think we'll see more come out of this? KASH: What I try to remind the American public of is the people that built this weaponization of justice and intelligence and law enforcement and its politicization, they built this diseased temple. It took them like 10 years. They've been in the seat nine months and we've already ripped open the Band-Aid and showed the world how they illegally surveilled on members of Congress, senators and House members, and staffers like myself, on top of Russiagate. So we're not only exposing what they did, but they are frantically, they, the media, the mainstream media, and those that were involved in the weaponization of justice are trying to cover it up by dousing water on our investigation. You think that's going to stop me and the deputy here? We're going to get there. We're already halfway there on a lot of it. I firmly believe that this Comey case is far from over. We are not finished. We are formulating a plan to make sure that we actually use the Constitution to hold people accountable and don't let the mainstream media drive another form of weaponization of justice. These people will not be let off the hook.
3:05

🚨PROSECUTING THE GRAND CONSPIRACY THE PERPETRATORS WILL NOT BE LET OFF THE HOOK KASH PATEL: Coming back to Russiagate, where I was the lead investigator on Capitol Hill, exposing the FISA abuse, the weaponization, the FBI lies, to a secret court, to illegally and unlawfully surveilling a political opponent. Yes, that happened with information they basically made up from overseas. So the way that we ensure public trust is to make sure that it never happens again. That's step one. Step two, accountability and transparency. So what we are doing, especially with our deep knowledge of what happened in Russiagate, is two things on a parallel track. Congress. Oversight. I'm committed to congressional oversight. My predecessors turned over, Comey, 3,000 pages to Congress in his three years in change, and Chris Wray turned over 13,000 in his almost seven years. In my nine months, we've turned over 40,000 pages of material to Congress. Not just Russiagate, Arctic Frost, but so many other things that they're interested in. We're going to continue doing that. Because I believe, as a senior staffer on the Hill, that's the best way to expose the information to the public and say, here, you read it, and you tell us what your feedback is. In this very building, there were rooms that were hidden away from the map site of the building, and nobody had access into them. And once we got into those rooms, we found more information related to the Russiagate hoax from prior FBI leadership. And that was in burn bags that they wanted to have destroyed, but for whatever reason, no one ever got around to it, or they thought we would just never find it. So we have multiple teams. We've built squads for both Russiagate and Arctic Frost, and we're using a grand jury process and we're issuing, I think we're up to like 75 or 100 subpoenas already, for witnesses. That's what you target first. We also have targets of our investigation, people we think committed acts of criminal conduct. And this, in my opinion, is why the media is going so hog-wild over the Comey prosecution. Notice how they're not attacking the evidence. They're just saying, oh, so-and-so was improperly appointed. That to me shows me we're over the target. That was just step one. LARA: So you still have open investigations into these people. You're still looking into what ultimately happened with them. So do you think we'll see more come out of this? KASH: What I try to remind the American public of is the people that built this weaponization of justice and intelligence and law enforcement and its politicization, they built this diseased temple. It took them like 10 years. They've been in the seat nine months and we've already ripped open the Band-Aid and showed the world how they illegally surveilled on members of Congress, senators and House members, and staffers like myself, on top of Russiagate. So we're not only exposing what they did, but they are frantically, they, the media, the mainstream media, and those that were involved in the weaponization of justice are trying to cover it up by dousing water on our investigation. You think that's going to stop me and the deputy here? We're going to get there. We're already halfway there on a lot of it. I firmly believe that this Comey case is far from over. We are not finished. We are formulating a plan to make sure that we actually use the Constitution to hold people accountable and don't let the mainstream media drive another form of weaponization of justice. These people will not be let off the hook.

Svetlana Lokhova

165,788 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

As we hear news of the govt. secretly allowing fentanyl into the US in huge numbers, "The Fentanyl Fast and Furious," it's worth remembering what horrors govt. officials have been willing to perpetrate in the past. Here's the main story I did exposing the "Fast and Furious" gunwalking scandal. We know if it thanks to the heroism of Special Agent John Dodson. Prior to Agent Dodson speaking to me on CBS national television, top govt. officials were openly lying to the media and saying these allegations were all fabricated. Once Dodson bravely came forward, and through the subsequent months of my investigations (with Congressional subpoenas gathering more info), it became undeniable. Ultimately, Attorney General Eric Holder was impeached. And finally, President Obama declared executive privilege to keep us from seeing White House documents related to the scandal. They're hidden to this day. We later learned this story was a major reason the govt. began its spy operation on me and my family, intruding into my CBS and personal computers and devices. Nobody has been held accountable for the intrusions to this day... even though we have the irrefutable forensics, insiders who testified to the govt. nature of the intrusions, and a govt whistleblower (former agent) who admitted being part of the spy operation against me and others-- then promptly died before we could get him to testify against higher-ups. Nobody was really held accountable for the Fast and Furious deaths and murders that happened as a result of the govt. operation, including the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The govt. tried to fire Agent Dodson countless times, but with the help of Sen. Grassley, he survived. He should have been held up as a model for federal employees to speak up when they see crimes committed in their agencies. Instead, he had to put up with being transferred, marginalized, and smeared. And he had to watch those responsible go on to keep working their jobs and, in some cases, get promoted. If you ever thought the govt. would not do horrific things that kill people, this story could change your mind. It did mine.
5:29

As we hear news of the govt. secretly allowing fentanyl into the US in huge numbers, "The Fentanyl Fast and Furious," it's worth remembering what horrors govt. officials have been willing to perpetrate in the past. Here's the main story I did exposing the "Fast and Furious" gunwalking scandal. We know if it thanks to the heroism of Special Agent John Dodson. Prior to Agent Dodson speaking to me on CBS national television, top govt. officials were openly lying to the media and saying these allegations were all fabricated. Once Dodson bravely came forward, and through the subsequent months of my investigations (with Congressional subpoenas gathering more info), it became undeniable. Ultimately, Attorney General Eric Holder was impeached. And finally, President Obama declared executive privilege to keep us from seeing White House documents related to the scandal. They're hidden to this day. We later learned this story was a major reason the govt. began its spy operation on me and my family, intruding into my CBS and personal computers and devices. Nobody has been held accountable for the intrusions to this day... even though we have the irrefutable forensics, insiders who testified to the govt. nature of the intrusions, and a govt whistleblower (former agent) who admitted being part of the spy operation against me and others-- then promptly died before we could get him to testify against higher-ups. Nobody was really held accountable for the Fast and Furious deaths and murders that happened as a result of the govt. operation, including the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. The govt. tried to fire Agent Dodson countless times, but with the help of Sen. Grassley, he survived. He should have been held up as a model for federal employees to speak up when they see crimes committed in their agencies. Instead, he had to put up with being transferred, marginalized, and smeared. And he had to watch those responsible go on to keep working their jobs and, in some cases, get promoted. If you ever thought the govt. would not do horrific things that kill people, this story could change your mind. It did mine.

Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

98,432 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On the arrest of Vinesh Chandel, co-founder of I-PAC, Advocate Vikas Pahwa says, "I think he was arrested somewhere around 7.45 in the evening, and the family was informed that he'll be taken to the Patiala House Court. So we all reached there around 9.30, knowing that he would be produced there. Later on, we learned that he will be produced in the residence of the special judge of Patiala House... Then the hearing took place late at night till about 12 o'clock, and then the order was dictated, and the order was released somewhere around 4 or 5 AM. First thing which I would like to point out is that when an accused is arrested at 7.45 in the evening, you have 24 hours to produce him in the court. There was a need to take an accused at midnight in an odd hour, requesting a judge to take up the matter... Second is that this person is the director of a company called I-PAC. IPAC is a company which helps the political party in conducting elections... This company does not have any ideology. They have given advice to the BJP, Congress and various other parties. It's part of their job. We all know that elections are happening in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. This company is advising political parties there. The involvement of this company came for the first time on 8th January, when their offices were raided in West Bengal, and the case, which was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate at that point in time is a case with regard to the coal scam, which is from 2020, about six years back. Those cases have already been investigated. Chargesheets have been filed. Prosecution complaints have been filed by the ED. Still, the ED used that case to conduct a search. Although I-PAC had nothing to do with those cases. They called the directors for an investigation. Two of the directors, one who was stationed in Tamil Nadu, the other who was stationed in West Bengal, both challenged those summons in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court hearing is going on. It was going on even till yesterday, and now the case is listed for Friday. While the Delhi High Court is hearing the issuance of summons to the directors of the IPAC. These new cases have been registered. I presume that the new case where the allegation made by enforcement directorate is with regard to cheating and conspiracy, and falsification of accounts. When we see the allegations, which they have now shared with us, we have realised that no offence of cheating is made out in this case, and the allegations are very vague. Even if we accept the allegation, it's a violation under the Income Tax Act, which is not a scheduled offence. There's an allegation of GST not being paid, which is again a GST violation, which is not a scheduled offence. So it looks, prima facie, as a lawyer to me, that all these allegations which are now being made in the predicate offence FIR, now registered by EOW, and the Enforcement Directorate, the ECIR, which is registered by ED, no cognisable offence is made out..."
7:46

#WATCH | Delhi: On the arrest of Vinesh Chandel, co-founder of I-PAC, Advocate Vikas Pahwa says, "I think he was arrested somewhere around 7.45 in the evening, and the family was informed that he'll be taken to the Patiala House Court. So we all reached there around 9.30, knowing that he would be produced there. Later on, we learned that he will be produced in the residence of the special judge of Patiala House... Then the hearing took place late at night till about 12 o'clock, and then the order was dictated, and the order was released somewhere around 4 or 5 AM. First thing which I would like to point out is that when an accused is arrested at 7.45 in the evening, you have 24 hours to produce him in the court. There was a need to take an accused at midnight in an odd hour, requesting a judge to take up the matter... Second is that this person is the director of a company called I-PAC. IPAC is a company which helps the political party in conducting elections... This company does not have any ideology. They have given advice to the BJP, Congress and various other parties. It's part of their job. We all know that elections are happening in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu. This company is advising political parties there. The involvement of this company came for the first time on 8th January, when their offices were raided in West Bengal, and the case, which was being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate at that point in time is a case with regard to the coal scam, which is from 2020, about six years back. Those cases have already been investigated. Chargesheets have been filed. Prosecution complaints have been filed by the ED. Still, the ED used that case to conduct a search. Although I-PAC had nothing to do with those cases. They called the directors for an investigation. Two of the directors, one who was stationed in Tamil Nadu, the other who was stationed in West Bengal, both challenged those summons in the Delhi High Court. The Delhi High Court hearing is going on. It was going on even till yesterday, and now the case is listed for Friday. While the Delhi High Court is hearing the issuance of summons to the directors of the IPAC. These new cases have been registered. I presume that the new case where the allegation made by enforcement directorate is with regard to cheating and conspiracy, and falsification of accounts. When we see the allegations, which they have now shared with us, we have realised that no offence of cheating is made out in this case, and the allegations are very vague. Even if we accept the allegation, it's a violation under the Income Tax Act, which is not a scheduled offence. There's an allegation of GST not being paid, which is again a GST violation, which is not a scheduled offence. So it looks, prima facie, as a lawyer to me, that all these allegations which are now being made in the predicate offence FIR, now registered by EOW, and the Enforcement Directorate, the ECIR, which is registered by ED, no cognisable offence is made out..."

ANI

47,046 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We had a detailed representation before the Election Commission. We told them, and we demonstrated according to us, beyond doubt and beyond any matter of controversy, that the RO has passed a perverse order. The Election Commission's own law, the Representation of the People Act, has Section 33A, which says that disclosure is required only in those cases where the punishment is more than two years, and above all, only in those cases where charges have been framed. The process of framing charges is a judicial process. A judge frames charges. Now, as any kindergarten or first-year law student knows, the first step is a private complaint. That private complaint may be baseless and may have no legs to stand on. The second stage is the taking of cognizance by the magistrate, which is a judicial and independent process. Ms. Natarajan only received a notice to appear before the court and explain why cognizance should not be taken. That means the notice she received was before any cognizance was taken. Without cognizance, no criminal case exists in the eyes of the law. There is no criminal case merely because I allege something against somebody else without cognizance being taken. They have rejected Ms. Natarajan's nomination despite the non-existence of even cognizance, which means there was no criminal case that she could have disclosed. Whereas Section 33A, says that after cognizance is taken, there will be an investigation. After the investigation, there will be a charge sheet. The RO's order uses the word "sangyan." Sangyan means cognizance. There was no cognizance taken. Ultimately, we also pointed out to the Election Commission that it has a huge reservoir of power under Article 324. It is a constitutional power, an untrammable power and an inherent power. It is the power to do justice and the power to right wrongs. We hope and trust that the Election Commission will realize that this creates a very bad, distorted, non-level playing field. A non-level playing field strikes at the heart of democracy. A violation of that strikes further at the heart of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, we have requested them for an immediate decision. We have come on the day of withdrawal. There is sufficient time. This is a completely egregious, blatant, patently unlawful order, without any basis in law, and it should be set aside immediately. That is our request. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.
4:26

We had a detailed representation before the Election Commission. We told them, and we demonstrated according to us, beyond doubt and beyond any matter of controversy, that the RO has passed a perverse order. The Election Commission's own law, the Representation of the People Act, has Section 33A, which says that disclosure is required only in those cases where the punishment is more than two years, and above all, only in those cases where charges have been framed. The process of framing charges is a judicial process. A judge frames charges. Now, as any kindergarten or first-year law student knows, the first step is a private complaint. That private complaint may be baseless and may have no legs to stand on. The second stage is the taking of cognizance by the magistrate, which is a judicial and independent process. Ms. Natarajan only received a notice to appear before the court and explain why cognizance should not be taken. That means the notice she received was before any cognizance was taken. Without cognizance, no criminal case exists in the eyes of the law. There is no criminal case merely because I allege something against somebody else without cognizance being taken. They have rejected Ms. Natarajan's nomination despite the non-existence of even cognizance, which means there was no criminal case that she could have disclosed. Whereas Section 33A, says that after cognizance is taken, there will be an investigation. After the investigation, there will be a charge sheet. The RO's order uses the word "sangyan." Sangyan means cognizance. There was no cognizance taken. Ultimately, we also pointed out to the Election Commission that it has a huge reservoir of power under Article 324. It is a constitutional power, an untrammable power and an inherent power. It is the power to do justice and the power to right wrongs. We hope and trust that the Election Commission will realize that this creates a very bad, distorted, non-level playing field. A non-level playing field strikes at the heart of democracy. A violation of that strikes further at the heart of the basic structure of the Constitution. Therefore, we have requested them for an immediate decision. We have come on the day of withdrawal. There is sufficient time. This is a completely egregious, blatant, patently unlawful order, without any basis in law, and it should be set aside immediately. That is our request. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.

Congress

42,100 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

LINK & INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO ATTEND OUR FEDERAL COURT HEARING VIA ZOOM NEXT MONDAY *Repost & share - We need to show the court that there is still very much public interest in this incredibly important landmark case. No government can be allowed to invoke such vile overreaching and tyrannical charter/human rights violations on Canadians ever again. Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit Hearing Date: November 3rd, 2025 - 1pm EST Case/file #: T-2536-23 - SHAUN RICKARD ET AL. v. HMK ET AL If you would like to attend the hearing virtually, please follow this link. Scroll down, go to page 2 and and click on the little green box with the pen (see attached screenshot). Then enter your information, click register and you will be sent an e-mail confirmation: *Please note, the hearing will now be held at the Federal Court in Toronto, not the Federal Court of Appeal as originally thought: 180 Queen St W Toronto ON M5V 1Z4 If you would like to attend in person, please contact the Clerk at the Federal Court and quote the file # above: T: 416-973-3356 E: audiences@fct-cf.ca Where we are at with the case: After nearly 4 years, the 15,000 pages of evidence – including some extremely damning/incriminating details – is getting closer to Court. Further to the Federal Court ruling that our landmark action can go to trial, the appeal to ensure the whole action can proceed will be heard on November 3rd, 2025 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Further to our earlier and full update below from January 9th of this year, we now now move a step closer to the opportunity to fully hold the Liberal government, and Justin Trudeau, to account in court. Their divisive, cruel and unscientific overreach in imposing a nearly 9 months ban on unvaccinated Canadians and Permanent Residents from travelling on planes, trains and ships caused hardship and damage to millions of people in Canada. The hard work of our talented young lawyer, Sam Presvelos, paid off in June 2022 when evidence emerging in discovery in those earlier stages of the case caused then Attorney General David Lametti to reconsider the government’s position and the ‘vaccine mandate for travel’ was suspended with the implicit threat being made that they would do it again if they wanted to do so. In a moment of respite those millions of people, denied their fundamental Section 6 rights for nearly 9 months, could once again travel to see their loved ones and family events; to work; and to take much needed vacation time. This appeal, which will be heard at the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto on November 3rd at 1pm Eastern Time, will consider whether Justice Kent Horne erred when he allowed the government’s motion to strike out two parts of our claim – those parts in relation to s.7 and s.12 of the Charter. Justice Horne allowed those parts in relation to s6 and s15 to go ahead to trial pending the outcome of this appeal and any further appeals that may follow. s.7 (life, liberty, security) deals with crucial rights that permit us all to decide for ourselves what happens to our body. We believe that the choice to accept a vaccine or not should be free of any sort of coercion or detrimental consequences imposed by any authority. They do not accept that the bar to their success in relation to s.7 is so high as to have no reasonable prospect of success and that their arguments should be allowed to proceed to trial. s.12 (cruel/unusual punishment) is normally heard in relation to the cruel and unusual punishment of people in the criminal justice system in relation to penal sanctions. We believe that then Prime Minister Trudeau developed the vaccine mandate as a deliberately cruel and unusual punishment for those Canadians who were exercising their s7 right to refuse the Covid-19 vaccines and, at the same time to use that punishment very publicly as a political campaign promise and ‘wedge issue’ in the 2021 General Election. The appeal will not be easy, but our case is in great hands with Sam Presvelos, the young litigator who achieved so much for millions of people in Canada who were, until June 2022, denied the right to even leave their country! If we succeed the government may then try to further appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is very apparent that they do not want this case to be heard and particularly, perhaps, the s.7 arguments. If we are unsuccessful at this stage, they may take their arguments to the Supreme Court. We want to have our arguments and evidence heard on all four Sections 6,7,12 and 15. If you would like to help support this incredibly important landmark lawsuit, you can do so via e-transfer: donations@freedomandjustice.ca or via the donations page on our website: More details can be found on our official website: Also more details/updates on the case and hearing here:
8:07

LINK & INSTRUCTIONS HOW TO ATTEND OUR FEDERAL COURT HEARING VIA ZOOM NEXT MONDAY *Repost & share - We need to show the court that there is still very much public interest in this incredibly important landmark case. No government can be allowed to invoke such vile overreaching and tyrannical charter/human rights violations on Canadians ever again. Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit Hearing Date: November 3rd, 2025 - 1pm EST Case/file #: T-2536-23 - SHAUN RICKARD ET AL. v. HMK ET AL If you would like to attend the hearing virtually, please follow this link. Scroll down, go to page 2 and and click on the little green box with the pen (see attached screenshot). Then enter your information, click register and you will be sent an e-mail confirmation: *Please note, the hearing will now be held at the Federal Court in Toronto, not the Federal Court of Appeal as originally thought: 180 Queen St W Toronto ON M5V 1Z4 If you would like to attend in person, please contact the Clerk at the Federal Court and quote the file # above: T: 416-973-3356 E: [email protected] Where we are at with the case: After nearly 4 years, the 15,000 pages of evidence – including some extremely damning/incriminating details – is getting closer to Court. Further to the Federal Court ruling that our landmark action can go to trial, the appeal to ensure the whole action can proceed will be heard on November 3rd, 2025 in the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Further to our earlier and full update below from January 9th of this year, we now now move a step closer to the opportunity to fully hold the Liberal government, and Justin Trudeau, to account in court. Their divisive, cruel and unscientific overreach in imposing a nearly 9 months ban on unvaccinated Canadians and Permanent Residents from travelling on planes, trains and ships caused hardship and damage to millions of people in Canada. The hard work of our talented young lawyer, Sam Presvelos, paid off in June 2022 when evidence emerging in discovery in those earlier stages of the case caused then Attorney General David Lametti to reconsider the government’s position and the ‘vaccine mandate for travel’ was suspended with the implicit threat being made that they would do it again if they wanted to do so. In a moment of respite those millions of people, denied their fundamental Section 6 rights for nearly 9 months, could once again travel to see their loved ones and family events; to work; and to take much needed vacation time. This appeal, which will be heard at the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto on November 3rd at 1pm Eastern Time, will consider whether Justice Kent Horne erred when he allowed the government’s motion to strike out two parts of our claim – those parts in relation to s.7 and s.12 of the Charter. Justice Horne allowed those parts in relation to s6 and s15 to go ahead to trial pending the outcome of this appeal and any further appeals that may follow. s.7 (life, liberty, security) deals with crucial rights that permit us all to decide for ourselves what happens to our body. We believe that the choice to accept a vaccine or not should be free of any sort of coercion or detrimental consequences imposed by any authority. They do not accept that the bar to their success in relation to s.7 is so high as to have no reasonable prospect of success and that their arguments should be allowed to proceed to trial. s.12 (cruel/unusual punishment) is normally heard in relation to the cruel and unusual punishment of people in the criminal justice system in relation to penal sanctions. We believe that then Prime Minister Trudeau developed the vaccine mandate as a deliberately cruel and unusual punishment for those Canadians who were exercising their s7 right to refuse the Covid-19 vaccines and, at the same time to use that punishment very publicly as a political campaign promise and ‘wedge issue’ in the 2021 General Election. The appeal will not be easy, but our case is in great hands with Sam Presvelos, the young litigator who achieved so much for millions of people in Canada who were, until June 2022, denied the right to even leave their country! If we succeed the government may then try to further appeal the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. It is very apparent that they do not want this case to be heard and particularly, perhaps, the s.7 arguments. If we are unsuccessful at this stage, they may take their arguments to the Supreme Court. We want to have our arguments and evidence heard on all four Sections 6,7,12 and 15. If you would like to help support this incredibly important landmark lawsuit, you can do so via e-transfer: [email protected] or via the donations page on our website: More details can be found on our official website: Also more details/updates on the case and hearing here:

Shaun Rickard

34,834 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

GRAND CONSPIRACY AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP Former Attorney General, Sen. Eric Schmitt explains that people WILL be held accountable for their part of this conspiracy, and that there is likely an ongoing investigation into Russiagate and what followed. "The statute of limitations has not run out on a conspiracy. And if you're a co-conspirator in mile marker one, even if you want to get on the exit ramp in mile marker five, you are liable for the conspiracy in mile marker ten. And we are at mile marker ten." SCHMITT: I am struck by the degree of the cognitive dissonance that I hear on the other side. I'm used to sort of political debates and arguing in court and all those sorts of things, but to hear the other side of the dais to talk about weaponization is truly shocking given what we know now. And I thought what I might do is just tell a story, and these are 100% facts. Hillary Clinton, concerned about her email scandal, works with a Soros organization to cook up this Russiagate nonsense. They feed it to the intelligence agencies, and they spy under Barack Obama's presidency, they spy on the political opponent, the Republican running against Hillary Clinton. He gets elected. They continue the operation, and they launder this intelligence into stuff that was meant to by the FBI and the CIA to sideline a presidency of a duly elected president of the United States of America, to sideline him. And that continued. You heard even some people on this committee further that nonsense for four years. And then the FBI is involved with pre-bunking the Hunter Biden laptop story, because they couldn't, they didn't want to be elected again. So they pre-bunked the Hunter Biden laptop story. The American people should have been allowed to make their own judgments from that. They weren't, because the FBI called it a Russian hack-and-leak operation. They were meeting with social media companies every month and every week, telling them that the laptop that they knew that they had verified in November of 2019, they knew it was real and it was his, said it was Russian disinformation. We've heard that before. And then, after Joe Biden comes in, three days in, they start a censorship campaign against the country, anybody who's a conservative. And now we also know that the FBI was weaponized in this Arctic Frost investigation, that tapped the phones of sitting U.S. senators. And also, the Republican Attorneys General Association, so let's pull in two more U.S. senators, Ashley Moody and myself, who were on the Executive Committee at that time. Charlie Kirk, political organizations they didn't agree with. This is not in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. This is in the United States of America in the last few years. When they thought President Trump was on the run, and there's no way people would elect him, and then he announces he's running for president. Three days later, Jack Smith's appointed to get Trump. Fannie Willis brings charges against President Trump, and the assistant prosecutor meets with the White House Counsel's Office. Why would that happen? Then you have Alvin Bragg bring his charges. The number three person at DOJ goes to work for him to get Trump. All in the United States of America. This continued, and Senator Hawley asked the question, what is happening in this country? And I hope that MSNBC is still broadcasting this, because I'm sure their viewership hasn't heard this story that's gone on for ten years. The truth is, they never forgave President Trump for coming down the escalator at all. They didn't like him, they didn't like the disruption, and they've spent the better part of a decade not just going after him, but demonizing half the country as fascists and Nazis and threats to democracy. And they have fueled this division in their inability to accept the fact that half of the country isn't deplorables as Hillary Clinton called her, bitter clingers as Barack Obama called them, or trash as Joe Biden called them. But they rose up and they sat in their own jury box and they saw all this stuff play out over a decade and they rejected it. And now you have come in to clean that up, and you are doing a great job in doing that. And let me make this clear, there is a big difference between what happened under the Biden regime and the weaponization, and then holding those people accountable. If that doesn't happen, this will happen all over again. So your job, as you talked about in your confirmation hearing, is so important that this never happens again. And holding people accountable for a part of this conspiracy is absolutely your job. And I'm also taking, you don't have to comment on this, your unwillingness to answer questions that have come up. I am led to believe, as a former Attorney General, that that might mean there's an ongoing investigation. You don't have to talk about it. The statute of limitations may have run on some of this stuff, but not on a conspiracy. And if you're a co-conspirator in mile marker one, even if you want to get on the exit ramp in mile marker five, you are liable for the conspiracy in mile marker ten. And we are at mile marker ten.
5:04

GRAND CONSPIRACY AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP Former Attorney General, Sen. Eric Schmitt explains that people WILL be held accountable for their part of this conspiracy, and that there is likely an ongoing investigation into Russiagate and what followed. "The statute of limitations has not run out on a conspiracy. And if you're a co-conspirator in mile marker one, even if you want to get on the exit ramp in mile marker five, you are liable for the conspiracy in mile marker ten. And we are at mile marker ten." SCHMITT: I am struck by the degree of the cognitive dissonance that I hear on the other side. I'm used to sort of political debates and arguing in court and all those sorts of things, but to hear the other side of the dais to talk about weaponization is truly shocking given what we know now. And I thought what I might do is just tell a story, and these are 100% facts. Hillary Clinton, concerned about her email scandal, works with a Soros organization to cook up this Russiagate nonsense. They feed it to the intelligence agencies, and they spy under Barack Obama's presidency, they spy on the political opponent, the Republican running against Hillary Clinton. He gets elected. They continue the operation, and they launder this intelligence into stuff that was meant to by the FBI and the CIA to sideline a presidency of a duly elected president of the United States of America, to sideline him. And that continued. You heard even some people on this committee further that nonsense for four years. And then the FBI is involved with pre-bunking the Hunter Biden laptop story, because they couldn't, they didn't want to be elected again. So they pre-bunked the Hunter Biden laptop story. The American people should have been allowed to make their own judgments from that. They weren't, because the FBI called it a Russian hack-and-leak operation. They were meeting with social media companies every month and every week, telling them that the laptop that they knew that they had verified in November of 2019, they knew it was real and it was his, said it was Russian disinformation. We've heard that before. And then, after Joe Biden comes in, three days in, they start a censorship campaign against the country, anybody who's a conservative. And now we also know that the FBI was weaponized in this Arctic Frost investigation, that tapped the phones of sitting U.S. senators. And also, the Republican Attorneys General Association, so let's pull in two more U.S. senators, Ashley Moody and myself, who were on the Executive Committee at that time. Charlie Kirk, political organizations they didn't agree with. This is not in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. This is in the United States of America in the last few years. When they thought President Trump was on the run, and there's no way people would elect him, and then he announces he's running for president. Three days later, Jack Smith's appointed to get Trump. Fannie Willis brings charges against President Trump, and the assistant prosecutor meets with the White House Counsel's Office. Why would that happen? Then you have Alvin Bragg bring his charges. The number three person at DOJ goes to work for him to get Trump. All in the United States of America. This continued, and Senator Hawley asked the question, what is happening in this country? And I hope that MSNBC is still broadcasting this, because I'm sure their viewership hasn't heard this story that's gone on for ten years. The truth is, they never forgave President Trump for coming down the escalator at all. They didn't like him, they didn't like the disruption, and they've spent the better part of a decade not just going after him, but demonizing half the country as fascists and Nazis and threats to democracy. And they have fueled this division in their inability to accept the fact that half of the country isn't deplorables as Hillary Clinton called her, bitter clingers as Barack Obama called them, or trash as Joe Biden called them. But they rose up and they sat in their own jury box and they saw all this stuff play out over a decade and they rejected it. And now you have come in to clean that up, and you are doing a great job in doing that. And let me make this clear, there is a big difference between what happened under the Biden regime and the weaponization, and then holding those people accountable. If that doesn't happen, this will happen all over again. So your job, as you talked about in your confirmation hearing, is so important that this never happens again. And holding people accountable for a part of this conspiracy is absolutely your job. And I'm also taking, you don't have to comment on this, your unwillingness to answer questions that have come up. I am led to believe, as a former Attorney General, that that might mean there's an ongoing investigation. You don't have to talk about it. The statute of limitations may have run on some of this stuff, but not on a conspiracy. And if you're a co-conspirator in mile marker one, even if you want to get on the exit ramp in mile marker five, you are liable for the conspiracy in mile marker ten. And we are at mile marker ten.

Svetlana Lokhova

238,755 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

US Attorney Bill Essayli announces California Democrats oversaw massive homelessness money fraud California Democrats have allowed developers to submit fake records and fake bank statements, then approving them for hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for free “Investigation of where billions of California tax dollars intended to solve homelessness ended up. California has spent more than $24 billion over the last five years with little to no progress in solving our homelessness epidemic. California state officials failed to provide meaningful oversight over the individuals who received most of these funds, and they had little to no answers to the public's demand for accountability” “Well, that accountability starts today. Today we are announcing significant developments into our investigation. We are making public criminal cases relating to two separate real estate developers who were involved in misappropriating millions of state funds intended to combat homelessness. This morning, federal agents arrested Cody Holmes, a 31-year-old Beverly Hills resident and the former CFO of Shangri-La Industries, a downtown LA-based developer of affordable housing housing for defrauding the Homekey program that is administered by the state of California. The program awarded grant money, which included federal tax dollars, for specific projects to convert motels into housing for the homeless and to operate the units. By April of 2022, Shangri-La Industries, where Holmes was the CFO, had co-applied with multiple California cities to convert numerous properties in California, including a location in Thousand Oaks. The state asked for proof that the company had the financial capacity to build all the projects. In response, Holmes and Shangri-La knowingly submitted fake bank statements, which claimed to show that developer had about $160 million on deposit. Not only were the bank statements fake, our investigation shows that Shangri-La and its affiliates had nowhere near the amount of money they claimed they had in the bank statements.”
2:04

US Attorney Bill Essayli announces California Democrats oversaw massive homelessness money fraud California Democrats have allowed developers to submit fake records and fake bank statements, then approving them for hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for free “Investigation of where billions of California tax dollars intended to solve homelessness ended up. California has spent more than $24 billion over the last five years with little to no progress in solving our homelessness epidemic. California state officials failed to provide meaningful oversight over the individuals who received most of these funds, and they had little to no answers to the public's demand for accountability” “Well, that accountability starts today. Today we are announcing significant developments into our investigation. We are making public criminal cases relating to two separate real estate developers who were involved in misappropriating millions of state funds intended to combat homelessness. This morning, federal agents arrested Cody Holmes, a 31-year-old Beverly Hills resident and the former CFO of Shangri-La Industries, a downtown LA-based developer of affordable housing housing for defrauding the Homekey program that is administered by the state of California. The program awarded grant money, which included federal tax dollars, for specific projects to convert motels into housing for the homeless and to operate the units. By April of 2022, Shangri-La Industries, where Holmes was the CFO, had co-applied with multiple California cities to convert numerous properties in California, including a location in Thousand Oaks. The state asked for proof that the company had the financial capacity to build all the projects. In response, Holmes and Shangri-La knowingly submitted fake bank statements, which claimed to show that developer had about $160 million on deposit. Not only were the bank statements fake, our investigation shows that Shangri-La and its affiliates had nowhere near the amount of money they claimed they had in the bank statements.”

Wall Street Apes

36,333 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Nessel Held in Contempt for Jumping Ethical Firewalls to Help Friends She blew off a subpoena to appear before the House, and now she could be heading down the road to impeachment By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Lansing — Attorney General Dana Nessel was held in contempt of the House of Representatives after she blew off a subpoena compelling her to explain her role in the financial abuse of an elderly and incapacitated woman. The House Oversight Committee voted 10 to 6 to refer the charges to the House as a whole. If convicted there, Nessel could technically be jailed. “Dana Nessel used the power of her office to manipulate possible criminal cases against people she had relations with,” said Jay DeBoyer, chairman of the Oversight Committee. “As the most powerful law enforcement officer in the state, Nessel stepped around ethical rules to benefit those personally close to her.” The hearing was something like a criminal trial held in absentia. Legislators grilled an empty chair and name plate carrying the attorney general’s name. This caused some confusion as the empty chair seemed to possess the same IQ as Nessel herself. In a crisp presentation, investigators for the committee laid out two cases involving Nessel, which can best be characterized as obstruction of justice. In the first, Nessel was shown to have crossed an ethical “firewall” that was to prohibit her involvement in her office’s criminal investigation of a friend. That friend, Traci Kornak—a probate lawyer who was treasurer of the state Democratic Party at the time—was accused by a whistleblower of using the identity of her elderly client Rose Burd and the tax ID number of the facility where Burd lived to commit insurance fraud. Nessel was obligated to stay out of it. But she didn’t. According to emails presented at the hearing, Nessel told her staff that Kornak needed the case wrapped up because Gov. Gretchen Whitmer—also a friend—was considering a judicial appointment for Kornak. The next day, Nessel’s staff gave the active criminal case file to Kornak. Two weeks later, the case was officially closed. After Nessel’s office shut down the case against Kornak, the Kent County Sheriff’s office opened its own. What did they find? More than $100,000 missing from the old woman’s bank account before the insurance scam ever came to light. It has recommended charges of embezzlement and identity theft against Kornak, felonies that carry 15-year sentences at least. Kornak is also under investigation by the Allegan County Probate Court for billing the old woman nearly $100,000 after she died earlier this year. In Burd’s probate casefile is a hand-written note from 2019 in which the old woman accused Kornak of theft. The judge did not allow it, and Nessel’s investigators never found the note. “This stinks to high heaven,” DeBoyer said. “In all of this, the only person who was interviewed by Nessel’s office was Kornak.” In a second case, investigators showed committee members how Nessel had yet again jumped an ethical firewall, this time involving her wife, Alanna Maguire. Maguire and her associates were subjects of a criminal referral to Nessel’s office by Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. It accused them of campaign finance fraud involving a gay-rights ballot initiative. Maguire was co-chair of that ballot committee, called Fair and Equal Michigan. (Investigators noted that a nearly identical criminal referral was made against a conservative group trying to strip Whitmer of her Covid emergency powers. Nessel charged two people in that case, which is currently in the courts.) Again an ethical firewall was constructed, and again Nessel jumped it. Documents showed that Nessel and Benson had agreed to make the criminal referral against Maguire go away. “I was informed by the AG that she reached out directly to the secretary and that the secretary agreed to take this matter back for further review,” Danielle Hagaman-Clark, Nessel’s criminal bureau chief wrote last year to Benson’s chief legal counsel, Mike Brady. To which Brady responded: “Thank you for the heads up. I will let the secretary know about our legal analysis that we lack any legal authority… to ‘take back’ or ‘restart’ that effort.’” Brady soon found himself on the unemployment line, according to DeBoyer. Nessel’s contempt charges were being drafted this afternoon and articles of impeachment may soon follow, said DeBoyer. Impeachment should be the least of it.
1:37

Nessel Held in Contempt for Jumping Ethical Firewalls to Help Friends She blew off a subpoena to appear before the House, and now she could be heading down the road to impeachment By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Lansing — Attorney General Dana Nessel was held in contempt of the House of Representatives after she blew off a subpoena compelling her to explain her role in the financial abuse of an elderly and incapacitated woman. The House Oversight Committee voted 10 to 6 to refer the charges to the House as a whole. If convicted there, Nessel could technically be jailed. “Dana Nessel used the power of her office to manipulate possible criminal cases against people she had relations with,” said Jay DeBoyer, chairman of the Oversight Committee. “As the most powerful law enforcement officer in the state, Nessel stepped around ethical rules to benefit those personally close to her.” The hearing was something like a criminal trial held in absentia. Legislators grilled an empty chair and name plate carrying the attorney general’s name. This caused some confusion as the empty chair seemed to possess the same IQ as Nessel herself. In a crisp presentation, investigators for the committee laid out two cases involving Nessel, which can best be characterized as obstruction of justice. In the first, Nessel was shown to have crossed an ethical “firewall” that was to prohibit her involvement in her office’s criminal investigation of a friend. That friend, Traci Kornak—a probate lawyer who was treasurer of the state Democratic Party at the time—was accused by a whistleblower of using the identity of her elderly client Rose Burd and the tax ID number of the facility where Burd lived to commit insurance fraud. Nessel was obligated to stay out of it. But she didn’t. According to emails presented at the hearing, Nessel told her staff that Kornak needed the case wrapped up because Gov. Gretchen Whitmer—also a friend—was considering a judicial appointment for Kornak. The next day, Nessel’s staff gave the active criminal case file to Kornak. Two weeks later, the case was officially closed. After Nessel’s office shut down the case against Kornak, the Kent County Sheriff’s office opened its own. What did they find? More than $100,000 missing from the old woman’s bank account before the insurance scam ever came to light. It has recommended charges of embezzlement and identity theft against Kornak, felonies that carry 15-year sentences at least. Kornak is also under investigation by the Allegan County Probate Court for billing the old woman nearly $100,000 after she died earlier this year. In Burd’s probate casefile is a hand-written note from 2019 in which the old woman accused Kornak of theft. The judge did not allow it, and Nessel’s investigators never found the note. “This stinks to high heaven,” DeBoyer said. “In all of this, the only person who was interviewed by Nessel’s office was Kornak.” In a second case, investigators showed committee members how Nessel had yet again jumped an ethical firewall, this time involving her wife, Alanna Maguire. Maguire and her associates were subjects of a criminal referral to Nessel’s office by Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson. It accused them of campaign finance fraud involving a gay-rights ballot initiative. Maguire was co-chair of that ballot committee, called Fair and Equal Michigan. (Investigators noted that a nearly identical criminal referral was made against a conservative group trying to strip Whitmer of her Covid emergency powers. Nessel charged two people in that case, which is currently in the courts.) Again an ethical firewall was constructed, and again Nessel jumped it. Documents showed that Nessel and Benson had agreed to make the criminal referral against Maguire go away. “I was informed by the AG that she reached out directly to the secretary and that the secretary agreed to take this matter back for further review,” Danielle Hagaman-Clark, Nessel’s criminal bureau chief wrote last year to Benson’s chief legal counsel, Mike Brady. To which Brady responded: “Thank you for the heads up. I will let the secretary know about our legal analysis that we lack any legal authority… to ‘take back’ or ‘restart’ that effort.’” Brady soon found himself on the unemployment line, according to DeBoyer. Nessel’s contempt charges were being drafted this afternoon and articles of impeachment may soon follow, said DeBoyer. Impeachment should be the least of it.

Michigan Enjoyer

45,855 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Shabad Massacre Could Have Been Prevented: Once Shabad accused is apprehended the police will either send him to judicial custody and then to divine custody to pacify angry masses. This obviously doesn’t absolve them of their guilt. In fact, the real questions we all should be asking are: 1. Why was the accused not arrested and produced before magistrate? Was there any compelling reason to not to arrest this monster? If yes, what are they? 2. Why were the statements of victim, her mother, and uncle not recorded by the magistrate under 164 Cr PC? 3. Why were the concerns of the uncle of the victim girl and victim weren’t informed to the trial court magistrate to cancel the bail of accused? Did you (police) send this case file to public prosecutor (PP) for legal opinion to get the bail cancelled? 4. Did both ACP and DCP, Chevella review the POCSO cases in their regular crime meetings? If yes, what written instructions (about forming special parties) did senior officials give to both the CI and SI? They should be in the CD file. No padding up please. 5. Did CP, Future City ever review the POCSO cases? If yes, what instructions did he pass on to his field officers of Chevella? 6. How often did the home minister and DGP review the Pocso cases and crimes against women? If yes, please show us the minutes of meeting. 7. Every PS has a detective inspector and every ACP division has a special branch officer and did they ever come across the information about the accused? If not, why? 8. Telangana has DGP, Women Safety post. Was this Shabad case ever reviewed by DG Women Safety? Even every Commissionerate has one DCP/ACP Women Safety and many SHE Teams. How did they miss info about accused and the case? 9. Had you done at least some of the above all these precious lives would have been saved. What kept you so busy all the day that you couldn’t spare your precious time to investigate this case? Is it bandobust to Revanth and his four brothers or land deals or anything? 10. Why do you think only SI and CI alone are responsible? Why not concerned ACP and DCP? Did they not fail in close supervision of the horrendous crimes that happen in their immediate surroundings ? As a society we must continue to ask the above questions to the government and home minister, Revanth Reddy garu. He is also accused of this ghastly massacre under vicarious liability principle. He failed to supervise the crimes against women and children regularly in spite of taking the lakhs of rupees salary every month and staying in a huge bungalow which is built with public money at nominal rent. We should also ask ourselves as a civilised society as to why we are unable to share the grief of these families of these poor victims. Why do we(including media) behave differently when rich become victims of such crimes?? No candle light rallies, no two minutes silence no media follow ups for these hapless souls. WHY ?? *Swaeroes Network observed two minutes silence in our meetings for Shabad victims in Wanaparty today. 🙏 Revathi DGP TELANGANA POLICE Telangana CMO Press Trust of India ANI KTR Women Safety Wing, Telangana Police Telangana Police
0:40

Shabad Massacre Could Have Been Prevented: Once Shabad accused is apprehended the police will either send him to judicial custody and then to divine custody to pacify angry masses. This obviously doesn’t absolve them of their guilt. In fact, the real questions we all should be asking are: 1. Why was the accused not arrested and produced before magistrate? Was there any compelling reason to not to arrest this monster? If yes, what are they? 2. Why were the statements of victim, her mother, and uncle not recorded by the magistrate under 164 Cr PC? 3. Why were the concerns of the uncle of the victim girl and victim weren’t informed to the trial court magistrate to cancel the bail of accused? Did you (police) send this case file to public prosecutor (PP) for legal opinion to get the bail cancelled? 4. Did both ACP and DCP, Chevella review the POCSO cases in their regular crime meetings? If yes, what written instructions (about forming special parties) did senior officials give to both the CI and SI? They should be in the CD file. No padding up please. 5. Did CP, Future City ever review the POCSO cases? If yes, what instructions did he pass on to his field officers of Chevella? 6. How often did the home minister and DGP review the Pocso cases and crimes against women? If yes, please show us the minutes of meeting. 7. Every PS has a detective inspector and every ACP division has a special branch officer and did they ever come across the information about the accused? If not, why? 8. Telangana has DGP, Women Safety post. Was this Shabad case ever reviewed by DG Women Safety? Even every Commissionerate has one DCP/ACP Women Safety and many SHE Teams. How did they miss info about accused and the case? 9. Had you done at least some of the above all these precious lives would have been saved. What kept you so busy all the day that you couldn’t spare your precious time to investigate this case? Is it bandobust to Revanth and his four brothers or land deals or anything? 10. Why do you think only SI and CI alone are responsible? Why not concerned ACP and DCP? Did they not fail in close supervision of the horrendous crimes that happen in their immediate surroundings ? As a society we must continue to ask the above questions to the government and home minister, Revanth Reddy garu. He is also accused of this ghastly massacre under vicarious liability principle. He failed to supervise the crimes against women and children regularly in spite of taking the lakhs of rupees salary every month and staying in a huge bungalow which is built with public money at nominal rent. We should also ask ourselves as a civilised society as to why we are unable to share the grief of these families of these poor victims. Why do we(including media) behave differently when rich become victims of such crimes?? No candle light rallies, no two minutes silence no media follow ups for these hapless souls. WHY ?? *Swaeroes Network observed two minutes silence in our meetings for Shabad victims in Wanaparty today. 🙏 Revathi DGP TELANGANA POLICE Telangana CMO Press Trust of India ANI KTR Women Safety Wing, Telangana Police Telangana Police

Dr.RS Praveen Kumar

20,474 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Bell Canada hangs up on entrepreneur — then allegedly steals his patented technology! “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Douglas Lloyd is the CEO of MediaTube, a small Canadian technology company. In 2012, MediaTube developed a breakthrough product that Lloyd says would’ve “changed how the world watches television.” Lloyd further states: “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Here’s the skinny, according to Lloyd: MediaTube reached out to Bell Canada 13 years ago. Bell was allegedly very enthused about MediaTube’s technology. The two companies collaborated, and things got off to a rosy start. But then, inexplicably, Bell Canada executives were no longer returning Lloyd’s calls. It was baffling. But then, Lloyd alleges: “They [Bell] changed their network, used our invention, and left us behind – no credit, no compensation, no apology.” So it was that MediaTube sued Bell Canada. In the 2016 Federal Court trial, MediaTube’s expert witnesses submitted detailed reports showing that Bell’s network was infringing on the company’s patent. For its part, Bell told the court and MediaTube that the network evidence they submitted was “wrong” and would be “corrected.” But by then, the damage had already been done. Bell’s new evidence was relied on at trial, and the court ruled against MediaTube. The company appealed in 2019 at the Federal Court of Appeal. That court upheld the original decision. But get this: Lloyd says judges presiding over the case were former lawyers who worked for – drum roll, please – Bell Canada! Surely this is conflict of interest. Surely such judges would recuse themselves from any case involving Bell. But no… Fast-forward to 2020 and something extraordinary happened: Bell was sued again for patent infringement, this time by a U.S. company called Rovi Guides Inc. That’s when MediaTube discovered something it could never have imagined – the court exhibits and technical testimony Bell submitted in the MediaTube trial were different from what they submitted in Rovi’s trial. Says Lloyd: “We began digging more. We reviewed other Bell court cases. And it became clear: the network description Bell used to defend itself in our trial actually bears little to no resemblance to the way their network actually operates, at least according to their testimony in Rovi versus Bell and in other testimony and documents supplied under oath to the Court and the CRTC.” From 2022 through 2024, MediaTube documented the discrepancies, gathered court filings, checked transcripts, and began to connect the dots. “In April 2025, we wrote directly to the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., Bell Canada’s parent company, and asked them to explain the contradictions – to look at the evidence themselves and respond,” says Lloyd. As for Bell’s response, the corporation went into attack mode. In May 2025, Bell filed a contempt motion against MediaTube and the Lloyd personally. Then in late June, Bell asked the court for a gag order — to prevent Lloyd from speaking to regulators, shareholders, and the media. “They [Bell] don’t want the public to hear what we found,” says Lloyd. “They want us erased. We are a small company with no legal team left – but we are still standing. We believe in the truth. We believe in accountability. And we believe you deserve to hear this story.” Lloyd says his company has launched a campaign that will fund the following: • Legal defence against the contempt motion and gag order • Regulatory complaints with the SEC, FCC, DOJ, and Canadian agencies • A public awareness campaign and documentary to expose what really happened • Protection of free speech and shareholder rights “We’re fighting not just for our invention -- but for every small company that’s been pushed out, every voice silenced, and every truth buried by power,” says Lloyd. “Bell Canada took our patented IPTV invention. Now they want to take our voice.” Rebel News reached out to Bell’s media relations team for comment several times. Bell’s media team didn’t even acknowledge our requests. All of which is quite odd behaviour coming from a corporation that runs the “Let’s Talk” campaign every February. Then again, if Lloyd’s allegations are indeed accurate, it would appear that Bell is less of a caring corporation and more of a belligerent bully…
18:42

Bell Canada hangs up on entrepreneur — then allegedly steals his patented technology! “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Douglas Lloyd is the CEO of MediaTube, a small Canadian technology company. In 2012, MediaTube developed a breakthrough product that Lloyd says would’ve “changed how the world watches television.” Lloyd further states: “We protected it. We filed the patents. We believed the courts would protect us. Then Bell Canada steals our invention – and now [Bell] wants to silence us forever.” Here’s the skinny, according to Lloyd: MediaTube reached out to Bell Canada 13 years ago. Bell was allegedly very enthused about MediaTube’s technology. The two companies collaborated, and things got off to a rosy start. But then, inexplicably, Bell Canada executives were no longer returning Lloyd’s calls. It was baffling. But then, Lloyd alleges: “They [Bell] changed their network, used our invention, and left us behind – no credit, no compensation, no apology.” So it was that MediaTube sued Bell Canada. In the 2016 Federal Court trial, MediaTube’s expert witnesses submitted detailed reports showing that Bell’s network was infringing on the company’s patent. For its part, Bell told the court and MediaTube that the network evidence they submitted was “wrong” and would be “corrected.” But by then, the damage had already been done. Bell’s new evidence was relied on at trial, and the court ruled against MediaTube. The company appealed in 2019 at the Federal Court of Appeal. That court upheld the original decision. But get this: Lloyd says judges presiding over the case were former lawyers who worked for – drum roll, please – Bell Canada! Surely this is conflict of interest. Surely such judges would recuse themselves from any case involving Bell. But no… Fast-forward to 2020 and something extraordinary happened: Bell was sued again for patent infringement, this time by a U.S. company called Rovi Guides Inc. That’s when MediaTube discovered something it could never have imagined – the court exhibits and technical testimony Bell submitted in the MediaTube trial were different from what they submitted in Rovi’s trial. Says Lloyd: “We began digging more. We reviewed other Bell court cases. And it became clear: the network description Bell used to defend itself in our trial actually bears little to no resemblance to the way their network actually operates, at least according to their testimony in Rovi versus Bell and in other testimony and documents supplied under oath to the Court and the CRTC.” From 2022 through 2024, MediaTube documented the discrepancies, gathered court filings, checked transcripts, and began to connect the dots. “In April 2025, we wrote directly to the Board of Directors of BCE Inc., Bell Canada’s parent company, and asked them to explain the contradictions – to look at the evidence themselves and respond,” says Lloyd. As for Bell’s response, the corporation went into attack mode. In May 2025, Bell filed a contempt motion against MediaTube and the Lloyd personally. Then in late June, Bell asked the court for a gag order — to prevent Lloyd from speaking to regulators, shareholders, and the media. “They [Bell] don’t want the public to hear what we found,” says Lloyd. “They want us erased. We are a small company with no legal team left – but we are still standing. We believe in the truth. We believe in accountability. And we believe you deserve to hear this story.” Lloyd says his company has launched a campaign that will fund the following: • Legal defence against the contempt motion and gag order • Regulatory complaints with the SEC, FCC, DOJ, and Canadian agencies • A public awareness campaign and documentary to expose what really happened • Protection of free speech and shareholder rights “We’re fighting not just for our invention -- but for every small company that’s been pushed out, every voice silenced, and every truth buried by power,” says Lloyd. “Bell Canada took our patented IPTV invention. Now they want to take our voice.” Rebel News reached out to Bell’s media relations team for comment several times. Bell’s media team didn’t even acknowledge our requests. All of which is quite odd behaviour coming from a corporation that runs the “Let’s Talk” campaign every February. Then again, if Lloyd’s allegations are indeed accurate, it would appear that Bell is less of a caring corporation and more of a belligerent bully…

Rebel News

41,805 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Musk & Epstein: The Third Culture Dossier by Johnny Vedmore "How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program." In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society. For many years, I have been unwittingly preparing to write this piece and a bulk of my previous investigations will intersect with this article. For those who aren’t aware, I have written extensively about Jeffrey Epstein’s influence on leading politicians and scientists; I have revealed previously unknown details behind the rise of Jeff Bezos; I have mapped out the history of modern Globalism; and I have written about the political influences behind such infamous leaders as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. In my NEWSHOUND series, I have covered the history of Elon Musk; his family life; his early businesses; as well as his more hidden ties to Microsoft. I’ve also examined the psychological “Nudge Units” adopted by Obama and Cameron respectively which were designed by the father of behavioural economics Richard Thaler and his colleague and co-author Cass Sunstein. And recently I revealed Eric Weinstein’s work for the UN, designing the current unfettered immigration we have seen happen all around the globe, along with his participation in Edge when it was almost fully funded by Jeffrey Epstein. However, I wasn’t expecting all these investigations to merge into one investigation eventually. Since I began reporting on Epstein and his accomplices in 2019, I have been searching for something rather specific. I have been trying to find people with previously unknown or unrevealed connections to the sex-offending intelligence operative. In doing so, I’ve been hopping around the internet archives on the hunt for concrete evidence that powerful people such as Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk met in person with Jeffrey Epstein. Although there were many rumours which suggest as much, finding definitive proof of these powerful people all in the same room, at the same time, has been challenging. However, what I wasn’t expecting to find was Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk being trained to manipulate the masses via a Jeffrey Epstein-funded program. But, alas, here we are. Prepare to look behind the curtain of power, as we investigate more than just Musk and Bezos’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein. We’re going to discover how an elite psychological operations unit trained the future technocratic elite on how to manipulate our lives, our societies, and, most of all, our minds. 🧵4/20
1:13

Musk & Epstein: The Third Culture Dossier by Johnny Vedmore "How Elon Musk Was Trained in Psychological Manipulation via a Jeffrey Epstein-Funded Program." In 2011, a small group of extremely influential people met to discuss the future of humanity. Among their ranks were Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Nathan Myhrvold, Sergey Brin, and the infamous pedophile child trafficker, Jeffrey Epstein. But this was not the first time these powerful and affluent technophiles had met to determine how best to control society. For many years, I have been unwittingly preparing to write this piece and a bulk of my previous investigations will intersect with this article. For those who aren’t aware, I have written extensively about Jeffrey Epstein’s influence on leading politicians and scientists; I have revealed previously unknown details behind the rise of Jeff Bezos; I have mapped out the history of modern Globalism; and I have written about the political influences behind such infamous leaders as Bill Clinton and Tony Blair. In my NEWSHOUND series, I have covered the history of Elon Musk; his family life; his early businesses; as well as his more hidden ties to Microsoft. I’ve also examined the psychological “Nudge Units” adopted by Obama and Cameron respectively which were designed by the father of behavioural economics Richard Thaler and his colleague and co-author Cass Sunstein. And recently I revealed Eric Weinstein’s work for the UN, designing the current unfettered immigration we have seen happen all around the globe, along with his participation in Edge when it was almost fully funded by Jeffrey Epstein. However, I wasn’t expecting all these investigations to merge into one investigation eventually. Since I began reporting on Epstein and his accomplices in 2019, I have been searching for something rather specific. I have been trying to find people with previously unknown or unrevealed connections to the sex-offending intelligence operative. In doing so, I’ve been hopping around the internet archives on the hunt for concrete evidence that powerful people such as Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk met in person with Jeffrey Epstein. Although there were many rumours which suggest as much, finding definitive proof of these powerful people all in the same room, at the same time, has been challenging. However, what I wasn’t expecting to find was Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk being trained to manipulate the masses via a Jeffrey Epstein-funded program. But, alas, here we are. Prepare to look behind the curtain of power, as we investigate more than just Musk and Bezos’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein. We’re going to discover how an elite psychological operations unit trained the future technocratic elite on how to manipulate our lives, our societies, and, most of all, our minds. 🧵4/20

Johnny Vedmore

49,991 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

0.001% TAX A junior auditor at PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him. Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there. Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax. His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder. Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting. Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them. The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax. Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars. Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013. Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary. PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ ICIJ pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks. The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe. A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice. Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky. December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door. April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted. Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely. Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up. The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched. So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison. BBC News (UK) · ICIJ · Reuters · Le Monde and others.
1:38

0.001% TAX A junior auditor at PwC in Luxembourg is getting ready to leave his job. Before he goes he goes looking for some training documents to take with him. Instead he finds a folder that anyone in the company could open. No password. No warning. Just sitting there. Inside are hundreds of secret deals between the Luxembourg government and some of the biggest companies on the planet. Deals that let them pay next to nothing in tax. His name is Antoine Deltour. He copies 30,000 pages. That is the whole story. He copies a folder. Let me explain what was actually in it, because this is where it gets interesting. Between 2002 and 2010, PwC alone helped broker 548 of these secret tax agreements, known as tax rulings, for over 340 companies. Apple. Ikea. Pepsi. Disney. Deutsche Bank. AIG. Koch Industries. Skype. GlaxoSmithKline. Coach. Abbott Laboratories. Household names, every one of them. The trick was simple. Companies moved profits through Luxembourg shell structures and Luxembourg quietly agreed in writing to look the other way on tax. Some of these companies ended up paying an effective tax rate under 1 percent. In some cases as low as 0.001 percent. On billions of dollars. Who was running Luxembourg for almost 20 years while this machine was built and protected? Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg until 2013. Deltour did not leak straight to the world. In 2012 he passed the documents to French journalist Edouard Perrin, who used them for a TV documentary. PwC noticed and filed a complaint with the Luxembourg courts. Then in November 2014, ICIJ ICIJ pulled together over 80 journalists across more than 30 media outlets in 26 countries and published the full scale of it as LuxLeaks. The timing could not have been worse for Juncker, or depending how you look at it, could not have been better. He had just been elected President of the European Commission days before the story broke. The man who ran the tax haven for two decades was now running Europe. A month later ICIJ dropped LuxLeaks 2, showing the other Big 4 accounting firms Deloitte, EY and KPMG were running the exact same playbook. This was never one bad apple. It was standard practice. Juncker faced a no confidence vote in the European Parliament over it. He survived. Deltour was not so lucky. December 2014, Luxembourg charges him with theft, violation of trade secrecy and fraudulent access to a computer system. He is facing up to 5 years in prison and a fine of 1,250,000 euros. For opening an unlocked folder on his way out the door. April 2016, the criminal trial. Deltour and his colleague Raphael Halet, another former PwC employee who leaked a second batch of documents, are both convicted. Deltour gets 12 months suspended and a 1,500 euro fine. Perrin the journalist is acquitted. Deltour appeals. Loses. Appeals again. Finally in May 2018 the Luxembourg Court of Appeal fully recognises him as a genuine whistleblower under European Court of Human Rights standards and acquits him completely. Halet's fight took even longer. He lost his Luxembourg appeals and only won at the European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber in 2023, nearly a decade after he first spoke up. The European Commission that Juncker went on to lead never opened a single formal investigation into a single LuxLeaks tax ruling. Not one. It did chase Starbucks, Fiat and Amazon over separate deals, but the mountain of paperwork Deltour handed over sat there untouched. So that is the LuxLeaks story. Build a tax avoidance machine for 20 years and get promoted to run the continent. Copy the evidence of it and spend most of a decade fighting to stay out of prison. BBC News (UK) · ICIJ · Reuters · Le Monde and others.

Artur Nadolny

101,486 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🔥🔥 31st of July 2026, important update and developments regarding covid, vaccine and Government related crimes. 🔥🔥 Please watch the below video it explains it all. We do understand it’s all part of the same system, however, if everyone gets on board that genuinely feels they are a victim, the Police will have no choice but to act and those responsible must be held to account. It’s all being exposed in the US, it needs to be exposed here too. Share this with everyone you know, millions will have been affected. It is my summation this will apply worldwide where the Covid 19 vaccines were and continue to be administered. Be mindful Scotland and Northern Ireland police might have different crime recording procedures to that of England and Wales. Some forces may re-direct you to the Counter Terrorism Police. All forces do collaborate with this specialist police force. Documents I refer to attached as follows. 1, Terrorism act 2000/2006. 2, Dr Francis Boyle affidavit confirming Covid 19 vaccinations are a biological weapon of mass destruction. This has also recently been submitted to The Metropolitan Police by South Wales Police on behalf of Dale Vincent 3, The Biological weapons anti terrorism act of 1989. Drafted by Dr Professor Francis Boyle and signed into law in May 1990 by President George H.W. Bush. 4, my complaint submission March 2026 with some of the supporting evidence, this is now being actively investigated by The Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Directorate. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) were consulted and they have directed The Met’s PSD to carry out the investigation into the closure and handling of crime reference number 6029679/21. A number of the high profile experts, professionals, witnesses and victims involved in the original crime report, at my request, have made contact with The Met PSD. They have been acknowledged and in some cases identified as complainants. 5, the home office crime recording rules 2026/2027. These are specific to England and Wales, for Scotland and Northern Ireland be guided by those forces. Page 6, The Standard directs a victim focused approach to crime recording. The intention is that victims are believed and benefit from statutory entitlements under the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime (CPVC). This seeks to ensure that those reporting crimes will be treated with empathy and their allegations will be taken seriously. Any investigation which follows is then taken forward with an open mind to establish the truth. THE POLICE CANNOT IGNORE YOUR COMPLAINT BY SAYING THE GOVERNMENT APPROVAL AND ROLL OUT OF THE VACCINE IS LAWFUL. THE ALLEGATIONS BEING MADE ARE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. OPERATION TALLA STYLE DIRECTIVES ARE UNLAWFUL AND CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SCOTTISH POLICE AUTHORITY AND FORMS PART OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS DIRECTORATE REGISTERED COMPLAINT. THE POLICE HAVE STATUTORY DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS TO INVESTIGATE THE CRIMES REPORTED AND MUST REMAIN IMPARTIAL, INDEPENDENT, DISPLAY PROFESSIONAL CURIOSITY AND TO KEEP AN OPEN MIND. THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND INVESTIGATIONS ACT 1996 (CPIA 1996) ALL POLICE FORCES MUST ADHERE TO; An investigation conducted by police officers with a view to it being ascertained whether a person should be charged with an offence, or whether a person charged with an offence is guilty of it." It outlines the codes of practice for any investigation set out by the Secretary of State. All investigators have a responsibility for carrying out the duties imposed on them under this code including and in particular recording information and retaining records of information and material. Watch the video, read the documents and then action if this applies to you. Thank you to ETHICAL APPROACH UK Phil Hyland
14:32

🔥🔥 31st of July 2026, important update and developments regarding covid, vaccine and Government related crimes. 🔥🔥 Please watch the below video it explains it all. We do understand it’s all part of the same system, however, if everyone gets on board that genuinely feels they are a victim, the Police will have no choice but to act and those responsible must be held to account. It’s all being exposed in the US, it needs to be exposed here too. Share this with everyone you know, millions will have been affected. It is my summation this will apply worldwide where the Covid 19 vaccines were and continue to be administered. Be mindful Scotland and Northern Ireland police might have different crime recording procedures to that of England and Wales. Some forces may re-direct you to the Counter Terrorism Police. All forces do collaborate with this specialist police force. Documents I refer to attached as follows. 1, Terrorism act 2000/2006. 2, Dr Francis Boyle affidavit confirming Covid 19 vaccinations are a biological weapon of mass destruction. This has also recently been submitted to The Metropolitan Police by South Wales Police on behalf of Dale Vincent 3, The Biological weapons anti terrorism act of 1989. Drafted by Dr Professor Francis Boyle and signed into law in May 1990 by President George H.W. Bush. 4, my complaint submission March 2026 with some of the supporting evidence, this is now being actively investigated by The Metropolitan Police Professional Standards Directorate. The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) were consulted and they have directed The Met’s PSD to carry out the investigation into the closure and handling of crime reference number 6029679/21. A number of the high profile experts, professionals, witnesses and victims involved in the original crime report, at my request, have made contact with The Met PSD. They have been acknowledged and in some cases identified as complainants. 5, the home office crime recording rules 2026/2027. These are specific to England and Wales, for Scotland and Northern Ireland be guided by those forces. Page 6, The Standard directs a victim focused approach to crime recording. The intention is that victims are believed and benefit from statutory entitlements under the Code of Practice for Victims of Crime (CPVC). This seeks to ensure that those reporting crimes will be treated with empathy and their allegations will be taken seriously. Any investigation which follows is then taken forward with an open mind to establish the truth. THE POLICE CANNOT IGNORE YOUR COMPLAINT BY SAYING THE GOVERNMENT APPROVAL AND ROLL OUT OF THE VACCINE IS LAWFUL. THE ALLEGATIONS BEING MADE ARE AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE. OPERATION TALLA STYLE DIRECTIVES ARE UNLAWFUL AND CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SCOTTISH POLICE AUTHORITY AND FORMS PART OF THE METROPOLITAN POLICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS DIRECTORATE REGISTERED COMPLAINT. THE POLICE HAVE STATUTORY DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS TO INVESTIGATE THE CRIMES REPORTED AND MUST REMAIN IMPARTIAL, INDEPENDENT, DISPLAY PROFESSIONAL CURIOSITY AND TO KEEP AN OPEN MIND. THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND INVESTIGATIONS ACT 1996 (CPIA 1996) ALL POLICE FORCES MUST ADHERE TO; An investigation conducted by police officers with a view to it being ascertained whether a person should be charged with an offence, or whether a person charged with an offence is guilty of it." It outlines the codes of practice for any investigation set out by the Secretary of State. All investigators have a responsibility for carrying out the duties imposed on them under this code including and in particular recording information and retaining records of information and material. Watch the video, read the documents and then action if this applies to you. Thank you to ETHICAL APPROACH UK Phil Hyland

M.Sexton

102,896 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat