Clown Show.

Mr Blackrobed Satanist also had a financial interest in the case. Court costs and fees go to the court.

Every case is securitized~ turned into a bond and placed into the CRIS System

Any idea how to track down the bonds?

@PT1091943 Friend of mine did. They get scared then. 1 of the accounts had 25k in it. Name was judges lunch money babahahah. Dirty bastards

@PT1091943 Then spill the beans. No use in saying it without telling how it's done.

Fruitcake posted a comment under this video~ ‘Sovereign Bullshit’. I deleted the comment. I should have poised the question ~ “How does one call our Sovereign Bullshit on an individual asking a judge for his credentials and oath?” Sovereign Citizen derogatory post is not relevant ~ 🙄🙄

There are several wrong things the man is saying. Forgot the bond/oath/etc. Stick to constitutions & granted authorities. Don’t get me wrong, the fake judge is unconstitutional but the guy speaking is wayyyy wrong. Fundamental principles overcome this fake stuff

Agree with you. He struck me as someone trying not to be adversarial and stay in honor. He could remain in his power and articulate the facts, iMO, he seemed conflicted on his communication path. Allowed the judge to change his course.. he should have taken the lead on the fact patterns~ not respond to judges word salad.

Reframe: the text of constitutions is the law. There’s no such thing as “staying in honor” when sworn trustees are disobeying the constitution. It’s good that the man was brave to face the government, but if we want all of our power, then we need to be impartial with the law. He said a LOT of things that are fake and if people believe him, then they’ll be misled. People created government by constitutions. When we stray from the text, we invite dumb stuff. I want people to have all of their power & an obedient government.

If you have time… would it be possible for you to state what you would say. Not word for word but your talk track on this one. 🙏🏻Not a script…

My oral arguments from September in Tennessee were full of what to say.

judge totally means to interrupt haha

They are criminals The judge is prosecuting and not following the constitution. He is invalidating his authority and has a duty to show the people proof of his authority.

Remember that 10% of all federal judges went on a visit to Isreal this year... your judicial system is rotten to the core.

@wakem369 So is it possible to find the names of every “judge” within the state of Washington and verify that they do have the appropriate paperwork?

@wakem369 FOIA and get their names, bonds and oaths

These judges are screwed and they know it

These Judges /Attorneys/ Lawyers/Barrister’s…. All take a solemn ( soul-mn) oath to the Bar Association, a controlled Maritime Law Group, European EL-ite control system

Sovereign citizen bullshit.

@Electric11Media We have allowed them the courts etc to strip our rights away

2nd amendment is made for men to use when judges don’t defend the constitution

Treason against the people!!

Oh they are going to bring it.

Is this true in foreclosure as well?

Yes. Oaths & Bonds.. it is all the same. Does not matter the charge.

Nor does the alleged prosecutor have a state license to practice law. A BAR card is not a license. We are learning so many ways to oust this fraud. And this court administrator should shut his mouth as he has no right nor should be attempting to practice law from the bench.

Seems to be a recurring issue with elected/public officials and their oath of office. Half of congress has zero oath on record. That’s what the Brunson vs United Sates which was all about that. It’s still sitting at the US Supreme Court. It would be nice to get that heard.

I can’t stand these people

Preposterous, unbelievable man. The Oath of Office is non-negotiable. It is a solemn agreement between the office holder and the citizens. Violate it at your own peril!

Understand within calibrated established legal lawful law foundation context title legality Authority Status statute Sovereignty jurisdiction even a child can see if the documentation does not have (public and or private liability) legal lawful law written on the document the Document is not a legal lawful law document 📃 that have written value for Human life 🧬 LLL LEGAL LAWFUL LAW Human DNA 🧬 Human beings not claiming Authority write within understand legal lawful law foundation context title legality Authority Status statute Sovereignty jurisdiction legal lawful law chain of command paper fact documents based on fact not fiction never fiction. The Police service is legally lawfully Required to be the Clerk of the Legal lawful law Court

If the judge is playing prosecutor has not taken up, oath of office is not bonded he’s not a judge, and he should not be in that position because he’s not a judge

This judge is a straight up fucking criminal a lie fucking criminal And it is the duty of the court to prove jurisdiction what a bunch of shit

Listen up: Every state has (under various names) the Judges and Solicitors retirement fund. It is financed by traffick tickets. Most people just pay it and don't fight it. I applaud this man. I never had to last time. Cop didn't show up so my accuser was not present. Dismissed.

McNutt vs G.M. 56 S Ct 789, 80 L Ed 1135 Griffin vs Matthews, 310 Supp 341, 423 F 2d 272 Basso vs U.P.L. 495 F 2d 906 Thomson vs Gaskiel 62 S Ct. 673, 83 L Ed 111

Failure to identify as a felony for government agents

"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted." Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F Supp. 150.

"There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction."  Joyce v. U.S., 474 F 2d 215:Melo v. U.S., 505 F 2d 1026:

"There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction."  Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215. "The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction."  Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416.

“Court must prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Lantana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F. Supp. 150;

ARE these people operating WITHOUT A BOND? I would like to know. Honestly! The man may have a point!

Judge is lieing

Make this common knowledge

"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910.

"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven." Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).