Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Codie Sanchez on escaping the permanent underclass: “If we think about just LLMs, these are giant aggregators of human knowledge, and most people don't actually know how to utilize them very well. Most of my small business owners think using AI is asking questions to ChatGPT. We are so...

31,917 просмотров • 18 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 15

Фото профиля Daniel DiNoia
Daniel DiNoia18 дней назад

i dont think she understands AI very well

Фото профиля ghst
ghst18 дней назад

Escaping absolute deprivation is far easier now. In 1820, ~75–85% of people lived near subsistence (extreme poverty); today under 10% do, despite population growing ~8×. Real living standards for the typical person are many times higher than two centuries ago, so most no longer need to “escape” the historical floor. Relative escape is different and stickier. Climbing status or avoiding the bottom of the current distribution remains hard because mobility rates have stayed low. Higher overall standards raise the bar for what counts as “escaping,” so a relative underclass can persist indefinitely even as absolute conditions improve. Population growth increases absolute numbers in any lower group, but the share stuck at the old absolute floor has fallen sharply.

Фото профиля W93x
W93x17 дней назад

this doesnt address the issue at all, its just about how humans are using ai. super smart ai will find the breakthroughs itself, it will run the business itself. the only input from humans will be "owning" the server.

Фото профиля Matt
Matt17 дней назад

No, because none of you actually know how to use it for the same reason that private equity fails most of the businesses it purchases you can’t adapt You won’t be able to tell AI how to either

Фото профиля ayden
ayden17 дней назад

this is why ive been learning to bake bread

Фото профиля Givancai
Givancai18 дней назад

The gap isn't AI vs humans. It's people who ask AI questions vs people who give it work.

Фото профиля Benjamin Haberman
Benjamin Haberman17 дней назад

Agreed. The shift for me was giving agents jobs instead of questions. A CFO bot reviews the books for 9 of my businesses every day. A developer and an admin assistant still check the work, and I sign off on anything that spends money.

Фото профиля Hayley Designs
Hayley Designs18 дней назад

wow!

Фото профиля JLarky
JLarky18 дней назад

it sounds like the practical takeaway is that LLMs impact on economics is not as important -- to you beeing in the permanent underclass -- as whether you elect N*zis to rule your goverment or not

Фото профиля James milano
James milano18 дней назад

Chatgpt, how do I build a business? Alex: twitter beings, you are accepted and not doomed. It's gathering knowledge of others successful business practices, tips and ways 90s twitter x host chess news teacher mama ladies.

Фото профиля Maximus Peperkamp
Maximus Peperkamp17 дней назад

I like that sentence "You probably are more inherently capable than you think" but I would change it into "You probably are more inherently capable than you speak."

Фото профиля DeskRoot | AI Workspaces
DeskRoot | AI Workspaces17 дней назад

The step past asking questions is giving it your business to work from. How you price, who your customers are, what you never promise. Write that down once, hand it over at the start, and the answers start from your rules instead of a blank chat.

Фото профиля tedhet
tedhet18 дней назад

the jump for most owners is to stop asking it questions and hand it a job with their real info "here are my prices, turn them into 3 packages a customer gets in 5 seconds" beats "how should I price" every time

Фото профиля Nate Needham
Nate Needham17 дней назад

Asking ChatGPT questions is where I started too. The shift was building AI employees that do a job every day without me asking. Which job would you hand over first?

Фото профиля Rashaad Ather
Rashaad Ather17 дней назад

@grok do you agree? What else is there to exploit AI with if not with just questions?

Похожие видео

Elon Musk on Grok: “I think an AI that is sort of SpaceX’s baby will be a very good AI. I think SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and morality and goodness, and I think we want to have an AI that is born of that capability and that morality and that goodness. I think that’s very, very important. So I’d like to encourage people to help out, actually, with the AI hardware on the ground and the AI software and, of course, with the AI satellites. Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The TerraFab will be a very important part of that, but we must also succeed on the software front, and we’re going to be training Grok on the sum total of all SpaceX information. So in a way, it will be trained on you. You will effectively be the parents of the AI. It will inherit your thoughts and ideas and beliefs, and I think that’s a good thing. So, yeah, we’ve got to win here on the AI hardware and the AI software. That maybe is the most important message. I think that is actually the most important message I wanted to convey today is that we must win on AI because the future is overwhelmingly AI and robots. So we won’t ultimately be able to control the AI. It’ll be too smart for that. But just like if you have a child that is a super genius child, you can still instill in that child the values and beliefs that you think are good and right. And so that’s why it’s incredibly important that we succeed with Grok. So, yeah, well, Grok 4.5 you’ve tried probably. We’ve got 4.6 coming out in about a week. And then 4.7 should be really pretty special. So I’d like to encourage everyone at SpaceX to use AI and to make it better.”

DogeDesigner

64,684 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

[Talking about self-worth and insecurities] 👨🏻‍🚀: I want everyone who has ever felt like they weren't pretty, they weren't attractive, they weren't good looking, they weren't strong enough, they had insecurities, or that they might feel like they're exploding from overthinking. And I'm not talking about one of these six, i'm talking about all of them. If you have ever had a situation where felt all six of these, I want you guys to type 1 into the chat. 👨🏻‍🚀: So, the point of that experiment wasn't to invalidate what you're feeling, because you're valid for feeling that. I think that is a common human emotion that we all have a problem we're dealing with. Our insecurities are the things that make us lash out, make us feel like we're not enough. And the thing about it, is no matter how rich you are, no matter how handsome you are, no matter how pretty you are, no matter how strong you are, no matter how great you are, no matter how intelligent you are, no matter how competent you are, there's always gonna be moments where this comes to you and I think the best thing to think in this situation is that yes i'm feeling this things, to validate yourself. You're not wrong for feeling this way. There's nothing wrong with you. Everyone feels this. 👨🏻‍🚀: But, during those times, i think it is very important to remember the moments in your life where you did feel worthy. Where you felt like you were just enough for that one person that you're talking to. Or you felt like you aced in a certain exam or you did really well in one thing. I think you remember those moments and then you push on for more of those moments so that eventually, in your life, you stop thinking about things that- or situation that made you think you're not worthy and start pondering more , recycling more of things that made you feel worthy. yunamseng?

nad

33,287 просмотров • 1 год назад