Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

.Cody Carbone explains why The Digital Chamber sued Illinois over its crypto tax, arguing the measure unfairly targeted the digital asset industry: “The tax that was passed was discriminatory on digital asset activity, and it was passed in the dark of night when there was no opportunity for feedback.”

43,033 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

Lark 🌸 profil fotoğrafı
Lark 🌸7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber shed it through without giving anyone a fair

Mari profil fotoğrafı
Mari7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber Illinois is the first state to try a dedicated digital-asset activity tax. If this stands, every other state just got a template.

Rohan Arun profil fotoğrafı
Rohan Arun7 gün önce

Hey Super, build a functional litigation and tax discrimination analysis tool based on the CoinDesk report of the Digital Chamber suing Illinois over its discriminatory crypto tax. The application must feature an interactive parameter workbench where visitors can adjust digital asset tax rates, benchmark them against traditional financial assets, test legislative notice periods (simulating the 'dark of night' passage), and evaluate constitutional claims including Dormant Commerce Clause and Equal Protection violations. The interface must use D3.js or Chart.js for rendering real-time tax disparity charts and litigation risk scores. When the visitor modifies sliders or toggles constitutional arguments, the system must immediately recalculate the discrimination index, litigation viability rating, and statutory defect score. A dedicated export panel must enable users to instantly download a structured litigation briefing summary. The UI must be fully responsive across desktop and mobile viewports with clean touch targets, zero horizontal overflow, and a persistent canonical result header.

Daniel Vargas profil fotoğrafı
Daniel Vargas7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber En Venezuela los impuestos llegan igual, de madrugada y sin preguntar. Una vez me metieron un 3% en una plataforma P2P que ni avisaron.

tonsofpetefuntv profil fotoğrafı
tonsofpetefuntv7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber A fair crypto tax should be chain-neutral and transparent; the real risk is a state-by-state patchwork that pushes custody and mining offshore without fixing revenue leakage. What remedy is the suit seeking?

Khamis Khalid profil fotoğrafı
Khamis Khalid7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber "Passing a tax in the dark of night with no feedback is bad process, full stop. Whether it's discriminatory is the legal question — but the way it went through says a lot."

Kyuubi16 profil fotoğrafı
Kyuubi167 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber Great update. Your analysis cuts through the noise on crypto tax. You and @JohnWuestlbik2 are my go to accounts.

Tiwish profil fotoğrafı
Tiwish7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber Nice update

Reinforce.fi | Stablecoin Yield profil fotoğrafı
Reinforce.fi | Stablecoin Yield7 gün önce

@CodyCarboneDC @DigitalChamber If this tax singles out digital asset activity specifically, it sets a precedent other states could copy piecemeal, creating a patchwork where where you incorporate or run infra matters more than where your users are.

Benzer Videolar