Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Coffee thoughts - New relationships This caught my attention yesterday. Candace you say Erika and you were never friends? You never had a relationship. Interesting. Now it makes sense on why the attacks on her. (Video 1) She started traveling with you guys immediately after Charlie and her met.... I bet that was hard. Now Charlie’s attention was all on Erika. You love to tell the stories about you and Charlie and how you were on the road. But once she came along it was all her and Charlie. Bet that sucked. Hawaii had to be horrible. Everything changed. Is that why you jumped on George so fast? George and Charlie were not friends either. Charlie firing him from TPUK stopped that. You never went out to dinner or hung out as couples. That’s why the only stories of you and Charlie you can tell now is before 2019. You’ve alluded to Erika and new people in Charlie’s life started having his ear when he started dating her. That he changed. You make it sound like those people are why you were let go and he started lying to you. (Video 4) You weren’t even invited to the wedding. Wonder how you took the not being invited. I bet you flipped. It does make me wonder who the gang was you thought would get back together after Charlie died. What old gang Candace? Erika and you never had a relationship. You had already attacked everyone at TPUsa, DW, the Trump family and most of the Conservative Party. Why in the world would you think they wanted you around? (Video 2) You unfollowed Charlie on social media and deleted all the pictures Candace they knew you were nuts. Thats stalkerish ex girlfriend vibes Candace. He had fired you again in May 2024 when you needed him most after losing your job at DW. Did you have hope before that he’d come back and you’d be a duo again? Not only did he fire you, he put Ben who you absolutely detest and think is trying to bankrupt you in your place at the events. Ouch. Besties don’t do that. This is all why the attacks on Erika and everyone that was part of that gang that grey rocked you isn’t it? The ones that had you sitting in a basement and not on the stage. They all worked together to take you down. The fact Erika took Charlie and is in that gang and now has the job you wanted is eating you alive. Vengeance is your vice. (Video 3). Go talk to your priest Candace.show more

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

20,803 subscribers

17,917 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

I think Candace is confused. Charlie met Erika on and started dating in Sept 2018. and had taken her to Hawaii that same month. Candace didn’t meet George until “Dec 2018”. I believe they meet before but let’s go with her timeline. So Erika and Charlie were dating before you even met George. Didn’t you already have a boyfriend and you left him for George? Ryan, remember Ryan? “Wing woman” you say Candace? He asked you to leave in May. So you and Erika for 5 months that you were there never had a relationship. Weird. You were so close to him that you never went to dinner or out during at least that 5 months? In 7 years You never met their kids? You weren’t invited to the wedding? But you didn’t even have a relationship with his family? Interesting. Candace Baby, the relationship with Charlie wasn’t what you say is it? We’ve been told what really happened. You were upset Erika was now there.

I think Candace is confused. Charlie met Erika on and started dating in Sept 2018. and had taken her to Hawaii that same month. Candace didn’t meet George until “Dec 2018”. I believe they meet before but let’s go with her timeline. So Erika and Charlie were dating before you even met George. Didn’t you already have a boyfriend and you left him for George? Ryan, remember Ryan? “Wing woman” you say Candace? He asked you to leave in May. So you and Erika for 5 months that you were there never had a relationship. Weird. You were so close to him that you never went to dinner or out during at least that 5 months? In 7 years You never met their kids? You weren’t invited to the wedding? But you didn’t even have a relationship with his family? Interesting. Candace Baby, the relationship with Charlie wasn’t what you say is it? We’ve been told what really happened. You were upset Erika was now there.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

61,020 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Charlie meets Erika - They met at the office. Erika was introduced to Charlie at that time and they talked for a moment about a job. Then they were set to meet again. Charlie says when he DM’d her to Urgently meet up it was partially for an interview but “partially for something else”. Sounds like that meeting at the office had Charlie crushing on Erika. When they met up for dinner…… 15 MINUTES into it he knew he was going to date her. Not hours but 15 minutes into it. Then they went on a second date because he had to see her again immediately and then took her to Hawaii the NEXT day. Josh and Sarah was there. Interesting Candace because you said he only dated her as a rebound and when you met her you believed she would only be a girlfriend. And that Erika basically wore him down over time claiming to be a Godly woman. That’s not how it sounds coming from Charlie. Sounds to me at the first meeting at the office he liked her. He took her to HAWAII the week after meeting her for dinner. They had already been dating and already gone on vacation to Hawaii before you met her. Why would you think she was only going to be a girlfriend? I think you’re fibbing again Candace. I don’t think Charlie was using Erika to make anyone jealous. Besides that wouldn’t be a Christian thing to do and I don’t see Charlie being that way. You on the other hand…..were you trying to make Charlie jealous with George and getting engaged so fast? Just asking questions. Seems suspicious to me. Super sweet video of Charlie and Erika about their meeting. He looks so young.

Charlie meets Erika - They met at the office. Erika was introduced to Charlie at that time and they talked for a moment about a job. Then they were set to meet again. Charlie says when he DM’d her to Urgently meet up it was partially for an interview but “partially for something else”. Sounds like that meeting at the office had Charlie crushing on Erika. When they met up for dinner…… 15 MINUTES into it he knew he was going to date her. Not hours but 15 minutes into it. Then they went on a second date because he had to see her again immediately and then took her to Hawaii the NEXT day. Josh and Sarah was there. Interesting Candace because you said he only dated her as a rebound and when you met her you believed she would only be a girlfriend. And that Erika basically wore him down over time claiming to be a Godly woman. That’s not how it sounds coming from Charlie. Sounds to me at the first meeting at the office he liked her. He took her to HAWAII the week after meeting her for dinner. They had already been dating and already gone on vacation to Hawaii before you met her. Why would you think she was only going to be a girlfriend? I think you’re fibbing again Candace. I don’t think Charlie was using Erika to make anyone jealous. Besides that wouldn’t be a Christian thing to do and I don’t see Charlie being that way. You on the other hand…..were you trying to make Charlie jealous with George and getting engaged so fast? Just asking questions. Seems suspicious to me. Super sweet video of Charlie and Erika about their meeting. He looks so young.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

43,469 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

She really thought that when Charlie died they were going to come running to her and ask her to come back to TPUsa. That all she had done to them and Charlie was going to be forgiven. And that TRUMP was going to let HER have access to the FBI and all the evidence and work with HER on her conspiracies. She also explains here that since Erika became the CEO that she has the right to go through Erika’s entire life and pull it apart. No Candace you really shouldn’t have. You were just jealous they didn’t hire you back. She says “Alls fair in Love and War” What war Candace? Erika didn’t declare a war on you. You declared one on her. You really need help. Malignant Narcisst. She didn’t get invited back and Trump didn’t assign her to the FBI so now she’s decided to try and destroy Erika, Trump and TPUsa.

She really thought that when Charlie died they were going to come running to her and ask her to come back to TPUsa. That all she had done to them and Charlie was going to be forgiven. And that TRUMP was going to let HER have access to the FBI and all the evidence and work with HER on her conspiracies. She also explains here that since Erika became the CEO that she has the right to go through Erika’s entire life and pull it apart. No Candace you really shouldn’t have. You were just jealous they didn’t hire you back. She says “Alls fair in Love and War” What war Candace? Erika didn’t declare a war on you. You declared one on her. You really need help. Malignant Narcisst. She didn’t get invited back and Trump didn’t assign her to the FBI so now she’s decided to try and destroy Erika, Trump and TPUsa.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

175,803 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Two things. First I should finish watching a video before I make comments on it. I didn’t realize Candace herself says the camera was on the inside of his shirt in 2025. Candace Charlie wasn’t an idiot. He knew why they were putting it on the inside of the shirt. Don’t you think he’d be a part of the change on how it was worn? He was Not a frog. Smh. And second. If her followers still believe her after the second video here where the demonstrator puts it on the way Charlie has it on there’s no helping them. But did you guys see her face. She knew her team had F’d up and put too much info out there. Lmao. Candace that sucked for you but your face was priceless. You were so pissed they let it run that long. When she does the little sniff it’s a sign she’s mad, happens every time. Remember she did it when Elizebeth said she had a dream about Charlie? Is someone getting fired?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,916 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Candace knew about the lawsuit before she went to Rome. Yet she says she hadn’t had time to talk to her husband about it? So Candace Baby, they sent you the detailed information on why and that they were suing you the day you went to Rome but you are surprised by the suit when it dropped and haven’t had time to talk to Georgie about it? So no time on the plane or in Rome you and George discussed the lawsuit? Were you even together? If I received a detailed letter and notice a lawsuit was about to hit….it would be the main topic of conversation between my husband and I for days. Another lie of Candace, she always forgets what she says, and then has to spin it. One lie that gets another lie, which gets another lie going. She knew, George knew and their PR move now is to use George as the reason they will file up dismiss.

Candace knew about the lawsuit before she went to Rome. Yet she says she hadn’t had time to talk to her husband about it? So Candace Baby, they sent you the detailed information on why and that they were suing you the day you went to Rome but you are surprised by the suit when it dropped and haven’t had time to talk to Georgie about it? So no time on the plane or in Rome you and George discussed the lawsuit? Were you even together? If I received a detailed letter and notice a lawsuit was about to hit….it would be the main topic of conversation between my husband and I for days. Another lie of Candace, she always forgets what she says, and then has to spin it. One lie that gets another lie, which gets another lie going. She knew, George knew and their PR move now is to use George as the reason they will file up dismiss.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

44,771 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I know many people have seen this video but I’d like to break it down a bit. I found this interesting for the timeline I’ve been putting together. Many of you have seen it. I’ll publish it again soon updated. Mark met Candace before she was anyone at TPUsa? Back in early 2017 at a TPUsa event? This is when she started doing her YouTube videos that took off. Was she stalking conservative events and high profile people to get into the circle? Did she stalk Charlie for months at events? Interesting. I remember her talking once about running around a TPUsa event handing out her cards to people so they’d know who she was. And then when Mark met her he offered to help her financially by giving her 1k a month for her bills. By just meeting her at an event? Because he was impressed with her. And thought she had potential. And she wasn’t a TpUSA employee? She’s good at manipulating for sure then. Then Charlie hires her at TPUsa in November about 6 months later then when Mark met her. That seems to be when she sent Mark the vile text saying she didn’t want to ever talk to him again with no explanation. I think it’s because she didn’t need him anymore. She succeeded in getting Charlie to hire her. It lines up. Then he says Charlie and him are hunting while the Kanye blowup is going on. So it’s really early in the Candace saga when Charlie says he needs to apologize for something. That people don’t change meaning Candace. That was Oct 2018. He says on that trip it was obvious Candace and Charlie had issues. Remember Candace was fired in May of 2019 from TPUsa. So Candace was being vicious from the beginning? I bet she was the one blowing up his phone in this clip. I wonder how long after Charlie hired Candace he regretted it. I bet immediately but he had her sign a contract the day he met her so he was locked in. My question is all this is was she stalking TPUsa events to get hired before Dave Rubin introduced Charle and Candace? Dave met her in early 2017 too. Mark says he tried to warn PragerU and DW about her. And that PragerU ended ugly. Why would these companies hire her after they saw what she had done at TPUsa. That will always confuse me. No matter how popular someone is if your friends are telling you she’s psychotic why would you invite that in? Just thinking out loud. So she’s made enemies with Dave, Mark, Dennis, Jeremy, Andrew, Blake, Mikey and everyone that she’s come into contact with. They all say she’s psycho. But she’s not the problem? Anyone see a pattern? Common denominator?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

12,435 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Questions for Candace Owens Question 1 You have said that you were kicked out of your home at age 14 and lived with a boyfriend for six months, describing yourself as “one of those kids.” How did those early experiences shape your understanding of relationships, authority, and personal boundaries? Question 2 Years later, in your debate with 20 feminists and on the podcast Whatever, you often gave the impression that you were not one of those kids. Maybe I am wrong, Candace, so can you tell us whether you ever talked about your past in those debates, or explained how those early experiences shaped the beliefs you now promote for women? Question 3 You have said that from about ages 8 to 18, you read only fiction books, and that you began reading nonfiction only after you became interested in politics. How did spending almost a decade reading only fiction affect how you understand the world’s complexity and complicated issues in general? Question 4 In 2007, you sued the Stamford Board of Education after reporting racist death-threat voicemails. In 2024, you publicly stated that you were again receiving death threats, but this time from the French government. Given that, according to you, your parents kicked you out of your home at age 14, that you later received death threats from students connected to the Stamford Board of Education, and that you now say you are receiving death threats from the French government, how do you understand this pattern of death-threat claims appearing at major phases of your life? Question 5 In 2015, when you started the project called Degree180, you published articles criticizing conservative Republicans and the Tea Party movement, and mocking Donald Trump, including comments about his penis size. During that same period, you also wrote articles stating that cheating and having affairs could be romantic, and another article suggesting that it could be smart for a woman to marry a gay man. Even if you identified at that time as a Democrat or a liberal, these views are not commonly held within those groups. What values were guiding those arguments at that time? Question 6 In 2016, you launched a project that involved publicly identifying individuals accused of online harassment. After the project was suspended, you were later doxxed. After you were doxxed, you blamed the left. Is that true, and did that experience contribute to your shift toward conservatism? Question 7 You have said that you used Charlie Kirk’s credit card to buy airline tickets to the UK without asking his permission. What was the nature of your professional or personal relationship with him that made you feel comfortable enough to do that? Question 8 In December 2018, during that UK trip, you met George Farmer. Shortly afterward, in May 2019, you made comments at a Turning Point UK event stating that nationalism itself was not problematic, and that Hitler’s issue was his global ambitions rather than nationalism confined to Germany. How do you reflect on the timing and substance of those remarks today? Question 9 After 2019, TPUSA distanced itself from you and you were no longer on the payroll, even though you later spoke at events such as the Michigan event in 2024. How did that distancing affect how you viewed TPUSA from that point forward? Question 10 Is it possible for you, and for your followers, to consider that Erika Kirk is not a perfect human being, like all of us, and that Turning Point USA is not a flawless organization, like any organization, but that your conclusion that they betrayed Charlie could be wrong, especially if that conclusion was influenced by a dream? Cc:Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) NΛTLY DΞNISΞ Alex Jones Tim Pool Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet FBI Donald J. Trump Dr. Phil Dr Jordan B Peterson Elon Musk Patrick Bet-David Adam 🆘 Sosnick

Questions for Candace Owens Question 1 You have said that you were kicked out of your home at age 14 and lived with a boyfriend for six months, describing yourself as “one of those kids.” How did those early experiences shape your understanding of relationships, authority, and personal boundaries? Question 2 Years later, in your debate with 20 feminists and on the podcast Whatever, you often gave the impression that you were not one of those kids. Maybe I am wrong, Candace, so can you tell us whether you ever talked about your past in those debates, or explained how those early experiences shaped the beliefs you now promote for women? Question 3 You have said that from about ages 8 to 18, you read only fiction books, and that you began reading nonfiction only after you became interested in politics. How did spending almost a decade reading only fiction affect how you understand the world’s complexity and complicated issues in general? Question 4 In 2007, you sued the Stamford Board of Education after reporting racist death-threat voicemails. In 2024, you publicly stated that you were again receiving death threats, but this time from the French government. Given that, according to you, your parents kicked you out of your home at age 14, that you later received death threats from students connected to the Stamford Board of Education, and that you now say you are receiving death threats from the French government, how do you understand this pattern of death-threat claims appearing at major phases of your life? Question 5 In 2015, when you started the project called Degree180, you published articles criticizing conservative Republicans and the Tea Party movement, and mocking Donald Trump, including comments about his penis size. During that same period, you also wrote articles stating that cheating and having affairs could be romantic, and another article suggesting that it could be smart for a woman to marry a gay man. Even if you identified at that time as a Democrat or a liberal, these views are not commonly held within those groups. What values were guiding those arguments at that time? Question 6 In 2016, you launched a project that involved publicly identifying individuals accused of online harassment. After the project was suspended, you were later doxxed. After you were doxxed, you blamed the left. Is that true, and did that experience contribute to your shift toward conservatism? Question 7 You have said that you used Charlie Kirk’s credit card to buy airline tickets to the UK without asking his permission. What was the nature of your professional or personal relationship with him that made you feel comfortable enough to do that? Question 8 In December 2018, during that UK trip, you met George Farmer. Shortly afterward, in May 2019, you made comments at a Turning Point UK event stating that nationalism itself was not problematic, and that Hitler’s issue was his global ambitions rather than nationalism confined to Germany. How do you reflect on the timing and substance of those remarks today? Question 9 After 2019, TPUSA distanced itself from you and you were no longer on the payroll, even though you later spoke at events such as the Michigan event in 2024. How did that distancing affect how you viewed TPUSA from that point forward? Question 10 Is it possible for you, and for your followers, to consider that Erika Kirk is not a perfect human being, like all of us, and that Turning Point USA is not a flawless organization, like any organization, but that your conclusion that they betrayed Charlie could be wrong, especially if that conclusion was influenced by a dream? Cc:Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) NΛTLY DΞNISΞ Alex Jones Tim Pool Tyler Bowyer Andrew Kolvet FBI Donald J. Trump Dr. Phil Dr Jordan B Peterson Elon Musk Patrick Bet-David Adam 🆘 Sosnick

Jinet Gharibian

105,902 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Coffee thoughts - Candace lies. She didn’t see footage of his funeral. She has no idea what happened at the funeral. She wasn’t there. She wasn’t on any phone calls and wouldn’t know what was said if there was one. She forgets what she says. I don’t. I have proof - Remember the first video where she was trying to prove Charlie was turning Catholic and she said she 100% knew Charlie had a Catholic mass and was buried in a Catholic cemetery? It fit her narrative. Oct 29th. Then months later she asked if he had ever had a funeral. Well Candace baby if you had the footage the day of his funeral why would you then say you questioned if he actually had a Catholic funeral? You would know if you had the footage the day of his funeral as you say. April 21st. You’re lying Candace you don’t have video of his funeral or you wouldn’t be asking months after you said you had video. Then in this video aired last she says she had the video the day of his actual footage. And the FBI called the day of the ACTUAL funeral. If that was true Candace you wouldn’t be asking if he had a Catholic funeral mass in April. Why the lies Candy? I’ll go through the rest of the video later. And debunk the lies and post. With proof.

Coffee thoughts - Candace lies. She didn’t see footage of his funeral. She has no idea what happened at the funeral. She wasn’t there. She wasn’t on any phone calls and wouldn’t know what was said if there was one. She forgets what she says. I don’t. I have proof - Remember the first video where she was trying to prove Charlie was turning Catholic and she said she 100% knew Charlie had a Catholic mass and was buried in a Catholic cemetery? It fit her narrative. Oct 29th. Then months later she asked if he had ever had a funeral. Well Candace baby if you had the footage the day of his funeral why would you then say you questioned if he actually had a Catholic funeral? You would know if you had the footage the day of his funeral as you say. April 21st. You’re lying Candace you don’t have video of his funeral or you wouldn’t be asking months after you said you had video. Then in this video aired last she says she had the video the day of his actual footage. And the FBI called the day of the ACTUAL funeral. If that was true Candace you wouldn’t be asking if he had a Catholic funeral mass in April. Why the lies Candy? I’ll go through the rest of the video later. And debunk the lies and post. With proof.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

17,657 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Hey @mattgutmanABC why are you pretending like you don’t know my name and painting me as some sort of witness intimidator? Why did you want me to keep it a secret that you, me, Karen Read and her defense team had dinner at a steakhouse in Boston on July 23, 2023, the day after the Rolling Rally? I told you all about the rolling rally and you thought it was awesome. You made it pretty clear that you knew Karen was innocent and you knew the McAlberts were guilty. We even exchanged numbers and met up 2 days later at Karen’s hearing. Were you just pretending to get an interview with her?

Hey @mattgutmanABC why are you pretending like you don’t know my name and painting me as some sort of witness intimidator? Why did you want me to keep it a secret that you, me, Karen Read and her defense team had dinner at a steakhouse in Boston on July 23, 2023, the day after the Rolling Rally? I told you all about the rolling rally and you thought it was awesome. You made it pretty clear that you knew Karen was innocent and you knew the McAlberts were guilty. We even exchanged numbers and met up 2 days later at Karen’s hearing. Were you just pretending to get an interview with her?

Aidan Kearney

462,842 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dear stupid people trying to claim the Charlie Kirk video is AI or a fake. I watched Charlie say that live on the livestream when it happened. The video is real. He said it, We all knew it was real. Unlike you all, we actually watched Charlie Kirk. You all spent months trying to claim "it never happened" now you have the proof. Instead of accepting defeat. You double down on stupidity. You're not "truth tellers" or "journalists" your pathetic miserable hacks. Find a new grift.

Dear stupid people trying to claim the Charlie Kirk video is AI or a fake. I watched Charlie say that live on the livestream when it happened. The video is real. He said it, We all knew it was real. Unlike you all, we actually watched Charlie Kirk. You all spent months trying to claim "it never happened" now you have the proof. Instead of accepting defeat. You double down on stupidity. You're not "truth tellers" or "journalists" your pathetic miserable hacks. Find a new grift.

J

75,857 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE EVERYTHING CHANGES….💫🛸💫 💥Note to Anons- Patriots: You have been through more than you let on, more than anyone knows, the sleepless nights, the relatives, friends and strangers that laughed at you. Moments you questioned yourself-times you had nothing left; but still chose to believe. You held on when others folded. You stayed when it would of been easier to walk away. That makes you rare, dangerous and destined. “You may not feel it right now,” but this is THE FINAL STRETCH before everything changes. There will come a day when you sit in stillness and remember the version of you who refused to “Give Up.” The one who showed up broke, exhausted and ridiculed; but never let go of the vision. That day is coming—and when it does you will cry; not because you are hurting-because it all finally made sense. All the pain, doubt, delays and all the missed exits. It wasn’t punishment; It was preparation. You weren’t meant to get rich fast, You were meant to become someone “Unshakable.” You are awake,alive and know this matters. Now, you’re too far in to turn around and way too close to fold under pressure. The storm is loud but your intuition is louder and it’s been screaming from the beginning; “Hold On-Just Hold.” This moment is once in a lifetime, you won’t see it again. NOT LIKE THIS-NOT AT THIS PRICE-NOT WITH THIS SETUP. So breathe, trust your gut, Silence the noise and when this ends-when it finally ENDS-you’ll be the one they come to asking “HOW YOU KNEW?” And you’ll smile 🙂because deep down, way down; “YOU ALWAYS KNEW.” I’m proud of you, you’re almost there; Finish The Mission-I Love You.

THE FINAL STRETCH BEFORE EVERYTHING CHANGES….💫🛸💫 💥Note to Anons- Patriots: You have been through more than you let on, more than anyone knows, the sleepless nights, the relatives, friends and strangers that laughed at you. Moments you questioned yourself-times you had nothing left; but still chose to believe. You held on when others folded. You stayed when it would of been easier to walk away. That makes you rare, dangerous and destined. “You may not feel it right now,” but this is THE FINAL STRETCH before everything changes. There will come a day when you sit in stillness and remember the version of you who refused to “Give Up.” The one who showed up broke, exhausted and ridiculed; but never let go of the vision. That day is coming—and when it does you will cry; not because you are hurting-because it all finally made sense. All the pain, doubt, delays and all the missed exits. It wasn’t punishment; It was preparation. You weren’t meant to get rich fast, You were meant to become someone “Unshakable.” You are awake,alive and know this matters. Now, you’re too far in to turn around and way too close to fold under pressure. The storm is loud but your intuition is louder and it’s been screaming from the beginning; “Hold On-Just Hold.” This moment is once in a lifetime, you won’t see it again. NOT LIKE THIS-NOT AT THIS PRICE-NOT WITH THIS SETUP. So breathe, trust your gut, Silence the noise and when this ends-when it finally ENDS-you’ll be the one they come to asking “HOW YOU KNEW?” And you’ll smile 🙂because deep down, way down; “YOU ALWAYS KNEW.” I’m proud of you, you’re almost there; Finish The Mission-I Love You.

Danielle knows a lot

45,594 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Oh look, the DEI Queen of Lies in my comments. I have a banger video for you tomorrow proving once again that you lied all while crying... "WOE IS ME", like the victim method actor that you are. You didn't text Harpole until December 17, a full 8 days AFTER you defamed him with your Ft. Huachuca premiere on December 9. You also proved you had his contact info but showed such disregard for the truth that you didn't text him before airing that episode. You first reached out on December 17, only after hearing he planned to sue you. You further proved malice by airing the Mitch Snow interview on December 18 without hearing from him and with no proof he was there. You met with Erika on December 15—six days after airing the Ft. Huachuca story—while in contact with Mitch Snow, the son of the Zodiac Killer, yet never asked her if she was at Ft. Huachuca during that 4-hour meeting. Three days later, you aired the Mitch Snow interview implicating Erika Kirk in Charlie's assassination. You then claimed "Vet bros" were threatening you not to interview him, which is laughable since everything you cited as proof came after your episode aired. Those texts reference "Mitch." No one knew who Mitch was before December 18. They also reference the GiveSendGo account and specifically $130K, which was after the interview. Your own allies—Ian Carroll, Evan Kilgore, and VFT—warned you Mitch lied to you, but now you call that a threat. 😂 You want to use all those facts and cry victim that you were entrapped into a defamation lawsuit. Your own stupidity and ignorance did that. I hope Harmeet K. Dhillon and Dhillon Law Group watched your Wednesday show. I think it turns a good lawsuit into a slam dunk. Keep lying that I was paid by TPUSA or directed by Andrew Kolvet and you'll face another lawsuit. It's a lie and you know it. Watching you crash and burn after grifting off Charlie's corpse, trying to destroy his legacy and family, is glorious. I'm here for it. 🍿 Here's a video clip to remind the world how sure you were of the "evidence" you were providing and stating they were "facts" while defaming Brian Harpole.

Sensitive content

Oh look, the DEI Queen of Lies in my comments. I have a banger video for you tomorrow proving once again that you lied all while crying... "WOE IS ME", like the victim method actor that you are. You didn't text Harpole until December 17, a full 8 days AFTER you defamed him with your Ft. Huachuca premiere on December 9. You also proved you had his contact info but showed such disregard for the truth that you didn't text him before airing that episode. You first reached out on December 17, only after hearing he planned to sue you. You further proved malice by airing the Mitch Snow interview on December 18 without hearing from him and with no proof he was there. You met with Erika on December 15—six days after airing the Ft. Huachuca story—while in contact with Mitch Snow, the son of the Zodiac Killer, yet never asked her if she was at Ft. Huachuca during that 4-hour meeting. Three days later, you aired the Mitch Snow interview implicating Erika Kirk in Charlie's assassination. You then claimed "Vet bros" were threatening you not to interview him, which is laughable since everything you cited as proof came after your episode aired. Those texts reference "Mitch." No one knew who Mitch was before December 18. They also reference the GiveSendGo account and specifically $130K, which was after the interview. Your own allies—Ian Carroll, Evan Kilgore, and VFT—warned you Mitch lied to you, but now you call that a threat. 😂 You want to use all those facts and cry victim that you were entrapped into a defamation lawsuit. Your own stupidity and ignorance did that. I hope Harmeet K. Dhillon and Dhillon Law Group watched your Wednesday show. I think it turns a good lawsuit into a slam dunk. Keep lying that I was paid by TPUSA or directed by Andrew Kolvet and you'll face another lawsuit. It's a lie and you know it. Watching you crash and burn after grifting off Charlie's corpse, trying to destroy his legacy and family, is glorious. I'm here for it. 🍿 Here's a video clip to remind the world how sure you were of the "evidence" you were providing and stating they were "facts" while defaming Brian Harpole.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

55,791 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Become the person you dreamed you could be when you were a kid …. How???? Easy … lean into courage and take risks and do things that will likely fail … all because you know the truth … What’s the truth? .. that no one really actually cares about your losses .. they may dinner but they will move on in seconds .. Why? .. because your life is yours .. and at the end of the day .. you need to play go you … not for “them”

Become the person you dreamed you could be when you were a kid …. How???? Easy … lean into courage and take risks and do things that will likely fail … all because you know the truth … What’s the truth? .. that no one really actually cares about your losses .. they may dinner but they will move on in seconds .. Why? .. because your life is yours .. and at the end of the day .. you need to play go you … not for “them”

Gary Vaynerchuk

17,555 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Just Got CAUGHT LYING On National TV About Charlie’s FINAL TEXT – And We Have the RECEIPTS🧾 Today on Glenn Beck's show Erika Kirk looked America in the eye and said: “He was NOT messaging people the day before saying ‘they’re going to kill me.’ I have his cell phone. It never happened.” That’s not a memory lapse. That’s not grief talking. That is a provable, documented, receipt-filled LIE. Here are the receipts she’s praying you never see: 🔘Harrison Smith (Infowars) – went public: Charlie told him days before he feared Israel would be taken out. 🔘Andrew Kolvet (TPUSA insider) – confirmed Charlie’s texts about threats. 🔘Frank Turek – went on record: The day before the event Charlie told him directly “they’re going to take me out.” 🔘Frank also read the email Charlie sent him weeks prior saying the exact same thing. 🔘Candace Owens showed the actual texts on her phone – Charlie saying his life was in danger. 🔘Multiple other witnesses (still off-record for safety) have told the same story privately. So Erika… Are Harrison, Andrew, Frank, Candace, and half of TPUSA leadership, and Charlie’s own phone all lying… or are you? You don’t “misspeak” when you’re holding the dead man’s phone and claiming you’ve read every message. You lie when you’re protecting the people who sent those threats. You lie when you’re running cover for the machine that killed him. You lie when you’re scared of what the truth would do to your $140 million grift. You don’t get to play grieving widow on Monday and professional liar on Tuesday. The mask is off. The receipts are in. And the Holy Spirit doesn’t bless bald-faced lies — even from widows. Repent, Erika. Because we’re not stopping. Drop a 📱 if you want Charlie’s real final messages released tomorrow. RT AND TAG Candace Owens. EVERY Christian needs to see who’s really telling the truth.

🚨EXPOSED: Erika Kirk Just Got CAUGHT LYING On National TV About Charlie’s FINAL TEXT – And We Have the RECEIPTS🧾 Today on Glenn Beck's show Erika Kirk looked America in the eye and said: “He was NOT messaging people the day before saying ‘they’re going to kill me.’ I have his cell phone. It never happened.” That’s not a memory lapse. That’s not grief talking. That is a provable, documented, receipt-filled LIE. Here are the receipts she’s praying you never see: 🔘Harrison Smith (Infowars) – went public: Charlie told him days before he feared Israel would be taken out. 🔘Andrew Kolvet (TPUSA insider) – confirmed Charlie’s texts about threats. 🔘Frank Turek – went on record: The day before the event Charlie told him directly “they’re going to take me out.” 🔘Frank also read the email Charlie sent him weeks prior saying the exact same thing. 🔘Candace Owens showed the actual texts on her phone – Charlie saying his life was in danger. 🔘Multiple other witnesses (still off-record for safety) have told the same story privately. So Erika… Are Harrison, Andrew, Frank, Candace, and half of TPUSA leadership, and Charlie’s own phone all lying… or are you? You don’t “misspeak” when you’re holding the dead man’s phone and claiming you’ve read every message. You lie when you’re protecting the people who sent those threats. You lie when you’re running cover for the machine that killed him. You lie when you’re scared of what the truth would do to your $140 million grift. You don’t get to play grieving widow on Monday and professional liar on Tuesday. The mask is off. The receipts are in. And the Holy Spirit doesn’t bless bald-faced lies — even from widows. Repent, Erika. Because we’re not stopping. Drop a 📱 if you want Charlie’s real final messages released tomorrow. RT AND TAG Candace Owens. EVERY Christian needs to see who’s really telling the truth.

Project Constitution

156,790 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

THE BIGGEST RED PILL IN HISTORY‼️ Once you see it, you will never unsee it. We can have all the discussions on why and how and all of that, but the first step is allowing yourself to believe what you are seeing with your own eyes. Joe Biden was never President. For me, that is an excellent starting point for us ALL to be able to have actual conversations and debates again. This is why the world must know the truth about the pause (45-47), what Joe Biden did, and why it had to be this way.

THE BIGGEST RED PILL IN HISTORY‼️ Once you see it, you will never unsee it. We can have all the discussions on why and how and all of that, but the first step is allowing yourself to believe what you are seeing with your own eyes. Joe Biden was never President. For me, that is an excellent starting point for us ALL to be able to have actual conversations and debates again. This is why the world must know the truth about the pause (45-47), what Joe Biden did, and why it had to be this way.

RealAF Patriot

57,561 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The fact that I be on this lady mind is funny, but I love this I get paid for this ..Nicki how are you going to buy anyone’s catalog when you got liens on your publishing and your tour deal? You blew your advance from your last tour and now this tour is collateral, so you’re literally bout to tour for free cause you owe Uncle Sam money.. You wanna holler that people judge your disgusting ass husband because they’re not used to being “loved” but you know who is used to be loved exactly like you? Wendy Williams. He loved her pockets to the end, letting her do all types of drugs so he could keep digging in that purse while you sit up there looking like an ass.. That man is keeping you all drugged up and mixing your coke wit horse tranquilizers and ozempic so he can make you more stupid while taking your money and letting you look crazy. YOU HAVE TO BUY LOVE. You have no room to judge anybody on anything. You have no friends (hence why they got you out here looking like a complete maniac while they “yesss queen!” you to death just to keep their brownie points and your nasty ego under control) your brothers are pedophiles, your real dad is drug addict like you, and your lil sister is living in the projects. You might be “Nicki Minaj” on the surface but deep down inside you’re that hurt lil girl that your mom abandoned in Trinidad till you was five and that’s why you hate her, you want to take about apologizing to mothers like you didn’t hit your own mom and as it came out your own mouth you still haven’t forgiven her …Muah no family, no friends😘 just coke.

The fact that I be on this lady mind is funny, but I love this I get paid for this ..Nicki how are you going to buy anyone’s catalog when you got liens on your publishing and your tour deal? You blew your advance from your last tour and now this tour is collateral, so you’re literally bout to tour for free cause you owe Uncle Sam money.. You wanna holler that people judge your disgusting ass husband because they’re not used to being “loved” but you know who is used to be loved exactly like you? Wendy Williams. He loved her pockets to the end, letting her do all types of drugs so he could keep digging in that purse while you sit up there looking like an ass.. That man is keeping you all drugged up and mixing your coke wit horse tranquilizers and ozempic so he can make you more stupid while taking your money and letting you look crazy. YOU HAVE TO BUY LOVE. You have no room to judge anybody on anything. You have no friends (hence why they got you out here looking like a complete maniac while they “yesss queen!” you to death just to keep their brownie points and your nasty ego under control) your brothers are pedophiles, your real dad is drug addict like you, and your lil sister is living in the projects. You might be “Nicki Minaj” on the surface but deep down inside you’re that hurt lil girl that your mom abandoned in Trinidad till you was five and that’s why you hate her, you want to take about apologizing to mothers like you didn’t hit your own mom and as it came out your own mouth you still haven’t forgiven her …Muah no family, no friends😘 just coke.

KenBarbie™

19,326,895 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This woman got an alert on her home camera that someone was trying to break in. When she speaks to him and tells him she can see him, he waves. 😂 Then she tells him to leave and that she has already called the cops. He takes off and hops the wall and is gone. Some people questioned why she would warn him that she had him on camera and told him she had notified the police. Others said he may have been able to take some stuff before the cops arrived. I would have done what she did. Why go through the hassle of repairing what he was going to break to get in, filing an insurance claim and him possibly taking something that was of value to you? What would you have done? Would you have just watched him and not said a thing hoping the cops arrived soon or would you have done what she did and told him to get lost?

This woman got an alert on her home camera that someone was trying to break in. When she speaks to him and tells him she can see him, he waves. 😂 Then she tells him to leave and that she has already called the cops. He takes off and hops the wall and is gone. Some people questioned why she would warn him that she had him on camera and told him she had notified the police. Others said he may have been able to take some stuff before the cops arrived. I would have done what she did. Why go through the hassle of repairing what he was going to break to get in, filing an insurance claim and him possibly taking something that was of value to you? What would you have done? Would you have just watched him and not said a thing hoping the cops arrived soon or would you have done what she did and told him to get lost?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

24,744 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад