Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Cold approaching and IG closing a Swedish model: Opening vibe is great. Assertive, uninhibited, curious tone. The way he asks his question has more power than people’s statements. “How tall are you” “Where are you from” Very basic questions but good energy. Next thread: “You model right?” “Definitely” Lots... of people might think this is “simping” but no. The way the thread is transitioned - “Well nice to meet you I’m UV” and doesn’t linger is great. (There was a cut in the clip so we can only assume lol) Signals that his question is more curiosity connected to her height rather than pedestalization (I think he is a model too). Continues assertion. “EMMA” voice spike no need. “Let me see the eyes” - good instruction. Issue assertiveness when you have good compliance, which he has. Otherwise your assertiveness will be a minus rather than a plus. Guessing game comes next. The premise is good as it’s a fun encouragement for investment, rather than simply answering. But doesn’t work great as he’s repeating himself. Neutral. Afterwards Repeats the introduction. Symptom of nervousness and perhaps why his vibe is always “on”. Notice he’s excitable throughout most of the interaction. Maybe that’s how he is, but can come across performative if overdone. That kind of energy is actually a superpower to have, but when you can’t mellow out in balance, It doesn’t feel real. More so like a presentation. And then he prematurely closes IG for coffee. No reason to do that. Is it possible that he could get her out? Yeah if good text game/IG/attraction. Now maybe there was more to the conversation that was clipped out, But on the merits of what was visible, it is less likely. Lots left on the table: Rapport, knowing her more (blueprint), emotional resonance, romantic intrigue, evaluations etc. She was most excited at the start - great beginning but no follow through. But by the end of it she could have taken or left it.show more

The Rizz Report

2,926 subscribers

68,755 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. When we have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and it still failed — it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined. I think this is the most important, non-obvious skill of a founder.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. But the degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.” Video source: Talks at Google (2017)

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. When we have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and it still failed — it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined. I think this is the most important, non-obvious skill of a founder.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. But the degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.” Video source: Talks at Google (2017)

Startup Archive

39,199 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. When we have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and it still failed — it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined. I think this is the most important, non-obvious skill of a founder.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. But the degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.” Video source: Talks at Google (2017)

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. When we have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and it still failed — it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined. I think this is the most important, non-obvious skill of a founder.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. But the degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.” Video source: Talks at Google (2017)

Startup Archive

54,429 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is how to compliment without simping. And why all the traditional never-validate advice is incomplete. Notice how there’s really zero repression, he’s very liberal with complimenting. “You are so cute” “I’m so serious” “You have such a cool look to you” If he feels like saying it, he says it. And he doesn’t come across like a fan at all. Reason why is because of the back and forth energy balance. Yes he compliments and validates, but he also takes away validation too. By: Giving her shit - “Yes you, not the person behind you” “I love how you’re so taken aback, as if this is not happening to you all day” By evaluating her - “… all black, I had to come see what’s happening” His entire demeanor throughout the interaction is a give and take. And so no matter how much he compliments, The balance remains even as he equally breaks rapport just as much if not more. “You speak good English right?” “Omg you’re unbelievable” “You’re kidding” Interrupting her and changing threads, Leading the conversation. What’s being communicated is: “Yes I am interested but I’m not a pushover” The interest comes not from pedeatalization but from expressing purely what’s on his mind. Both the positive and the negative. And that’s what works.

This is how to compliment without simping. And why all the traditional never-validate advice is incomplete. Notice how there’s really zero repression, he’s very liberal with complimenting. “You are so cute” “I’m so serious” “You have such a cool look to you” If he feels like saying it, he says it. And he doesn’t come across like a fan at all. Reason why is because of the back and forth energy balance. Yes he compliments and validates, but he also takes away validation too. By: Giving her shit - “Yes you, not the person behind you” “I love how you’re so taken aback, as if this is not happening to you all day” By evaluating her - “… all black, I had to come see what’s happening” His entire demeanor throughout the interaction is a give and take. And so no matter how much he compliments, The balance remains even as he equally breaks rapport just as much if not more. “You speak good English right?” “Omg you’re unbelievable” “You’re kidding” Interrupting her and changing threads, Leading the conversation. What’s being communicated is: “Yes I am interested but I’m not a pushover” The interest comes not from pedeatalization but from expressing purely what’s on his mind. Both the positive and the negative. And that’s what works.

The Rizz Report

39,286 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is actually a pretty good description of (some) things that will get girls chasing you. (While you generally don’t want to listen to female dating advice for men, a woman simply DESCRIBING what men have done with her that worked can be very informative.) In this case, the guy was using: ✅ Confident, self-possessed body language. She doesn’t say it, but I guarantee you he had great posture, moved slowly and deliberately but smoothly, and took up space. Doubtless had excellent eye contact. ✅ At some point (ONCE he had her INVESTED enough) he asked her if she thought he was ‘hot’. This was deep in the second date, probably after some good bonding or connection so she doesn’t want to burst the bubble by saying something other than ‘yes’. What this did was trigger a psychological concept called COMMITMENT-CONSISTENCY where, once someone has verbally agreed to something, that person then feels compelled to act in-line with it, and even reorients his or her views to match what was said. (You can read about this in Robert Cialdini’s book “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”, where he has a ton more studies + examples.) ✅ Once he had her out the third time, he could tell she wasn’t into him enough yet, but was invested enough to have come out multiple times, so he just hung back and gave her space to chase. What happens when she chases? Well, that is simple enough: she starts to like you more (then more!). (Also, you might think his dogged follow up of her was ‘chasing’, especially if you are the type who only texts a girl once or twice then quits if she isn’t all about it… however: there is a right way and a wrong way to follow up doggedly. The fact that this guy got another date and she started chasing him tells you he did it the right way. The right way is ‘persistence’, rather than ‘pursuit’.) A lot of guys now don’t use (or know) game at all… they’re just totally winging it on “does she instantly feel me or not?” You may not believe it until you try it for yourself, but yeah, there is a reason men have been doing this stuff with women since Ovid’s time and before… probably since long before recorded history. If you want her to CHASE, you need to get her invested enough to be willing to — then, after that, you must create the SPACE for her to chase you in!

This is actually a pretty good description of (some) things that will get girls chasing you. (While you generally don’t want to listen to female dating advice for men, a woman simply DESCRIBING what men have done with her that worked can be very informative.) In this case, the guy was using: ✅ Confident, self-possessed body language. She doesn’t say it, but I guarantee you he had great posture, moved slowly and deliberately but smoothly, and took up space. Doubtless had excellent eye contact. ✅ At some point (ONCE he had her INVESTED enough) he asked her if she thought he was ‘hot’. This was deep in the second date, probably after some good bonding or connection so she doesn’t want to burst the bubble by saying something other than ‘yes’. What this did was trigger a psychological concept called COMMITMENT-CONSISTENCY where, once someone has verbally agreed to something, that person then feels compelled to act in-line with it, and even reorients his or her views to match what was said. (You can read about this in Robert Cialdini’s book “Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion”, where he has a ton more studies + examples.) ✅ Once he had her out the third time, he could tell she wasn’t into him enough yet, but was invested enough to have come out multiple times, so he just hung back and gave her space to chase. What happens when she chases? Well, that is simple enough: she starts to like you more (then more!). (Also, you might think his dogged follow up of her was ‘chasing’, especially if you are the type who only texts a girl once or twice then quits if she isn’t all about it… however: there is a right way and a wrong way to follow up doggedly. The fact that this guy got another date and she started chasing him tells you he did it the right way. The right way is ‘persistence’, rather than ‘pursuit’.) A lot of guys now don’t use (or know) game at all… they’re just totally winging it on “does she instantly feel me or not?” You may not believe it until you try it for yourself, but yeah, there is a reason men have been doing this stuff with women since Ovid’s time and before… probably since long before recorded history. If you want her to CHASE, you need to get her invested enough to be willing to — then, after that, you must create the SPACE for her to chase you in!

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

390,693 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This guy called a detailing shop and asked what their price was for detailing the inside of his car. He was told $150 so he drove down there. After seeing the car the guy at the shop said we can do the $150 detail but to really get it clean it’s going to cost $300. The car, as you can see is filthy. The owner of the car got mad at the $300 price. Honestly, I think that is a great deal. Do you think that $300 was a good deal to clean that? Think it should me more or less? Do you think the owner of the car had a right to be upset?

This guy called a detailing shop and asked what their price was for detailing the inside of his car. He was told $150 so he drove down there. After seeing the car the guy at the shop said we can do the $150 detail but to really get it clean it’s going to cost $300. The car, as you can see is filthy. The owner of the car got mad at the $300 price. Honestly, I think that is a great deal. Do you think that $300 was a good deal to clean that? Think it should me more or less? Do you think the owner of the car had a right to be upset?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

102,859 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. We have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and still failed—and it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. The degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.”

Sam Altman: “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined” “The most underrated quality of all is being really determined. This is more important than being smart. This is more important than having a network. This is more important than a great idea.” As Sam explains: “The hardest thing about starting a company is the level and frequency of bad stuff that happens to you… So much of being a successful entrepreneur is just not giving up. We have funded people who had a great idea, perfect background on paper, a great product, and still failed—and it has usually been that they’re insufficiently determined.” He continues: “Of course you need a good product and a good market and to be smart, but that’s really obvious. The degree to which being a 3- or 4-standard deviation outlier on determination as a required skill of a CEO is not something that was obvious to me when I started.”

Startup Archive

32,513 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Not that Trump’s opinion matters, but for all the MAGAs saying Carney is a bad leader, watch this video, Trump says quote “Great Prime Minister, I mean, he can represent me anytime. I will tell you, I’m not saying that because he’s, he is, very strong, very good leader, he’s a nice man, but he can be nasty. He could be nasty, maybe as nasty as anybody. I think, I think Canada, let me put it this way, I can tell you this because I deal with lots of leaders all over the world, he is a, he’s a world class leader, a man who knows what he wants and eh, I’m not surprised that he won the election, and that he won substantially, and I would think he is more popular now. He’s a good man, he does a great job, but he’s a tough negotiator.” 👏❤️

Not that Trump’s opinion matters, but for all the MAGAs saying Carney is a bad leader, watch this video, Trump says quote “Great Prime Minister, I mean, he can represent me anytime. I will tell you, I’m not saying that because he’s, he is, very strong, very good leader, he’s a nice man, but he can be nasty. He could be nasty, maybe as nasty as anybody. I think, I think Canada, let me put it this way, I can tell you this because I deal with lots of leaders all over the world, he is a, he’s a world class leader, a man who knows what he wants and eh, I’m not surprised that he won the election, and that he won substantially, and I would think he is more popular now. He’s a good man, he does a great job, but he’s a tough negotiator.” 👏❤️

Joël.Arts.Paints This is our Canada 🇨🇦

353,159 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Spotify founder Daniel Ek to the CEO of Uber: “Since when is life about happiness?” When Dara Khosrowshahi was offered the job of Uber CEO, he consulted his long-time friend Daniel Ek, the founder of Spotify. Dara told Daniel that he was already happy being the CEO of Expedia, to which Daniel replied, “Since when is life about happiness? It’s about impact. You can have an impact on Uber, which is a really important company in the world that’s shaping the future of cities.” Daniel expands on what he meant by his advice to Dara: “I think happiness is a trailing indicator of impact . . . and impact is something that’s deeply personal to you. Only you can define what impact means for you . . . What was obvious for me, with someone like Dara, was he was content. He wasn’t happy. Knowing him for a while, he had gone through a phase where he had a lot of ups and downs with Expedia, and he mostly figured it out . . . Life was good. It was really easy. But there was an element of him — and you could hear it in his voice — where he was sort of like . . . ‘Why aren’t you going to go for greatness?’ ‘Why aren’t you going to test yourself?’ Because if you succeed this could be huge and you don’t really get many of these chances in your life.” Daniel continues: “But with another person, I might have given totally different piece of advice. So I don’t think it’s a universal truth. But I do think the universal truth is that happiness trails impact and impact is something that’s highly unique. It could be something innate in you. It could be having impact on other people. It could be having impact by being a great father around your kids. I don’t pretend to know that there’s one game to play or one universal truth of life. I certainly believe for entrepreneurial types — probably more like myself — this is really one of those key things: consider impact.” Video source: David Senra (2025)

Spotify founder Daniel Ek to the CEO of Uber: “Since when is life about happiness?” When Dara Khosrowshahi was offered the job of Uber CEO, he consulted his long-time friend Daniel Ek, the founder of Spotify. Dara told Daniel that he was already happy being the CEO of Expedia, to which Daniel replied, “Since when is life about happiness? It’s about impact. You can have an impact on Uber, which is a really important company in the world that’s shaping the future of cities.” Daniel expands on what he meant by his advice to Dara: “I think happiness is a trailing indicator of impact . . . and impact is something that’s deeply personal to you. Only you can define what impact means for you . . . What was obvious for me, with someone like Dara, was he was content. He wasn’t happy. Knowing him for a while, he had gone through a phase where he had a lot of ups and downs with Expedia, and he mostly figured it out . . . Life was good. It was really easy. But there was an element of him — and you could hear it in his voice — where he was sort of like . . . ‘Why aren’t you going to go for greatness?’ ‘Why aren’t you going to test yourself?’ Because if you succeed this could be huge and you don’t really get many of these chances in your life.” Daniel continues: “But with another person, I might have given totally different piece of advice. So I don’t think it’s a universal truth. But I do think the universal truth is that happiness trails impact and impact is something that’s highly unique. It could be something innate in you. It could be having impact on other people. It could be having impact by being a great father around your kids. I don’t pretend to know that there’s one game to play or one universal truth of life. I certainly believe for entrepreneurial types — probably more like myself — this is really one of those key things: consider impact.” Video source: David Senra (2025)

Startup Archive

122,485 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Spotify founder Daniel Ek to the CEO of Uber: “Since when is life about happiness?” When Dara Khosrowshahi was offered the job of Uber CEO, he consulted his long-time friend Daniel Ek, the founder of Spotify. Dara told Daniel that he was already happy being the CEO of Expedia, to which Daniel replied, “Since when is life about happiness? It’s about impact. You can have an impact on Uber, which is a really important company in the world that’s shaping the future of cities.” Daniel expands on what he meant by his advice to Dara: “I think happiness is a trailing indicator of impact . . . and impact is something that’s deeply personal to you. Only you can define what impact means for you . . . What was obvious for me, with someone like Dara, was he was content. He wasn’t happy. Knowing him for a while, he had gone through a phase where he had a lot of ups and downs with Expedia, and he mostly figured it out . . . Life was good. It was really easy. But there was an element of him — and you could hear it in his voice — where he was sort of like . . . ‘Why aren’t you going to go for greatness?’ ‘Why aren’t you going to test yourself?’ Because if you succeed this could be huge and you don’t really get many of these chances in your life.” Daniel continues: “But with another person, I might have given totally different piece of advice. So I don’t think it’s a universal truth. But I do think the universal truth is that happiness trails impact and impact is something that’s highly unique. It could be something innate in you. It could be having impact on other people. It could be having impact by being a great father around your kids. I don’t pretend to know that there’s one game to play or one universal truth of life. I certainly believe for entrepreneurial types — probably more like myself — this is really one of those key things: consider impact.” Source: David Senra (Sep 2025)

Spotify founder Daniel Ek to the CEO of Uber: “Since when is life about happiness?” When Dara Khosrowshahi was offered the job of Uber CEO, he consulted his long-time friend Daniel Ek, the founder of Spotify. Dara told Daniel that he was already happy being the CEO of Expedia, to which Daniel replied, “Since when is life about happiness? It’s about impact. You can have an impact on Uber, which is a really important company in the world that’s shaping the future of cities.” Daniel expands on what he meant by his advice to Dara: “I think happiness is a trailing indicator of impact . . . and impact is something that’s deeply personal to you. Only you can define what impact means for you . . . What was obvious for me, with someone like Dara, was he was content. He wasn’t happy. Knowing him for a while, he had gone through a phase where he had a lot of ups and downs with Expedia, and he mostly figured it out . . . Life was good. It was really easy. But there was an element of him — and you could hear it in his voice — where he was sort of like . . . ‘Why aren’t you going to go for greatness?’ ‘Why aren’t you going to test yourself?’ Because if you succeed this could be huge and you don’t really get many of these chances in your life.” Daniel continues: “But with another person, I might have given totally different piece of advice. So I don’t think it’s a universal truth. But I do think the universal truth is that happiness trails impact and impact is something that’s highly unique. It could be something innate in you. It could be having impact on other people. It could be having impact by being a great father around your kids. I don’t pretend to know that there’s one game to play or one universal truth of life. I certainly believe for entrepreneurial types — probably more like myself — this is really one of those key things: consider impact.” Source: David Senra (Sep 2025)

Startup Archive

15,659 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

Terri Green

16,778 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

To think that Camila was the most shy in front of a stage, more than all the others, it was so hard for her to dance and do a performance, but here is the difference, she made an effort and is capable of giving a good show, while fifth harmony….

To think that Camila was the most shy in front of a stage, more than all the others, it was so hard for her to dance and do a performance, but here is the difference, she made an effort and is capable of giving a good show, while fifth harmony….

Lucas

921,168 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Funny how women get so pissed when guys go full agenda mode on a date. She handled it like a cunt with no class after the guy’s blunder but she was also mirroring where the guy was coming from in terms of energy: If the man is going to be as overtly transactional in his delivery he could have gone for an escort and he could have saved himself time and money. But no he did not and he was indecisive. She does not want to make the decision. “Are you going home with me or no?” And if you wanna bring a girl back home: Don’t give her a choice, lead the way. This is an example of how “nice” he was. Key points - Don’t take her out to a place you can barely afford. Paying for the date is the cost of doing business. - Don’t be fake nice just to try to get the coochie, she will smell it - he revealed himself to be as such by his reaction. She won’t give it up to you because you paid a meal and was nice. - If you invite her for dinner, you are playing on harder mode, because you frame yourself default as the provider, and you will deal with more BS (even non-dinner dates you will deal with more nonsense vs meeting her on a night out or on holidays - her environment will dictate her default rules of engagement). - Don’t respond logically, troll her with what she gives you at this stage when it is completely fucked: instead of “that is how it is supposed to be” - she does not give a fuck about your rules - reply with “Cool, I will message Jessica” / instead of “I am not going to cry home” reply to her verbal jabs with “quite the challenge considering your crying for paying the full bill, but thank you that meal was really nice” Relationships are transactional, but it is not because it is that you have to be so overt about, it only creates resentment for both men and women. This is the male example of agenda mode, that women do often trying to hijack dates into interviews, and amusingly enough, it is hilarious to see how pissed off they are about it.

Sensitive content

Funny how women get so pissed when guys go full agenda mode on a date. She handled it like a cunt with no class after the guy’s blunder but she was also mirroring where the guy was coming from in terms of energy: If the man is going to be as overtly transactional in his delivery he could have gone for an escort and he could have saved himself time and money. But no he did not and he was indecisive. She does not want to make the decision. “Are you going home with me or no?” And if you wanna bring a girl back home: Don’t give her a choice, lead the way. This is an example of how “nice” he was. Key points - Don’t take her out to a place you can barely afford. Paying for the date is the cost of doing business. - Don’t be fake nice just to try to get the coochie, she will smell it - he revealed himself to be as such by his reaction. She won’t give it up to you because you paid a meal and was nice. - If you invite her for dinner, you are playing on harder mode, because you frame yourself default as the provider, and you will deal with more BS (even non-dinner dates you will deal with more nonsense vs meeting her on a night out or on holidays - her environment will dictate her default rules of engagement). - Don’t respond logically, troll her with what she gives you at this stage when it is completely fucked: instead of “that is how it is supposed to be” - she does not give a fuck about your rules - reply with “Cool, I will message Jessica” / instead of “I am not going to cry home” reply to her verbal jabs with “quite the challenge considering your crying for paying the full bill, but thank you that meal was really nice” Relationships are transactional, but it is not because it is that you have to be so overt about, it only creates resentment for both men and women. This is the male example of agenda mode, that women do often trying to hijack dates into interviews, and amusingly enough, it is hilarious to see how pissed off they are about it.

French OG | Your Dating and Relationship Guide

285,267 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

15 days ago, Rocky came in as close to death as is possible for a dog to be. It has been a battle to get him back into shape but I think you will agree that he is looking fantastic. People often ask me how you put up with the cruelty when you deal with dogs and it's a very good question. The answer actually comes from dogs themselves. You have to take it one day at a time. What has happened in the past is the past. All we can do, just like dogs, is enjoy the moment and the day that we have. Today was a gorgeous sunny Sunday and myself and Rocky had smoked salmon. He followed me for a proper walk down Hope Avenue. He had lots of belly rubs and he was as gentle and kind as a dog could be. Sometimes you just have to forget about what's happened in the past and not look too far into the future. We're all very guilty of it but Rocky has taught me to enjoy the moment, the present. He’s a very good boy is our Rocky ❤️

15 days ago, Rocky came in as close to death as is possible for a dog to be. It has been a battle to get him back into shape but I think you will agree that he is looking fantastic. People often ask me how you put up with the cruelty when you deal with dogs and it's a very good question. The answer actually comes from dogs themselves. You have to take it one day at a time. What has happened in the past is the past. All we can do, just like dogs, is enjoy the moment and the day that we have. Today was a gorgeous sunny Sunday and myself and Rocky had smoked salmon. He followed me for a proper walk down Hope Avenue. He had lots of belly rubs and he was as gentle and kind as a dog could be. Sometimes you just have to forget about what's happened in the past and not look too far into the future. We're all very guilty of it but Rocky has taught me to enjoy the moment, the present. He’s a very good boy is our Rocky ❤️

Niall Harbison

167,076 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Megyn Kelly on her BEEF with Mark Levin: “Rather than dealing with it like a man — by making a joke about it, whatever, ignoring it, brushing me back from the plate — he actually ran to the President of the United States. He ran to Donald Trump and had Trump send out a nice tweet about him last night overnight. And it was a ridiculous tweet, for which now the president is getting blowback because he does not have his finger on the pulse of where his party is right now, which is very unusual for Trump. This is very strange, the tweet. It’s very strange that Mark Levin couldn’t fight his own battle; but, you know, like true, pathetic, weakling bullies, he’s all bark and no bite as soon as you punch them back.” “I think anybody can see that I was entitled to one below the belt punch. When they go low. We go microp*nis. That’s the way it’s going to be.” “So you cannot be part of the MAGA movement if you speak ill of Mark Levin. That’s where we are. That doesn’t hurt me at all. I’ve not been part of the MAGA movement. Again, I will stay MAGA-adjacent, which is where I am happily, but he is going to further destroy his own coalition if he continues with this.”

Megyn Kelly on her BEEF with Mark Levin: “Rather than dealing with it like a man — by making a joke about it, whatever, ignoring it, brushing me back from the plate — he actually ran to the President of the United States. He ran to Donald Trump and had Trump send out a nice tweet about him last night overnight. And it was a ridiculous tweet, for which now the president is getting blowback because he does not have his finger on the pulse of where his party is right now, which is very unusual for Trump. This is very strange, the tweet. It’s very strange that Mark Levin couldn’t fight his own battle; but, you know, like true, pathetic, weakling bullies, he’s all bark and no bite as soon as you punch them back.” “I think anybody can see that I was entitled to one below the belt punch. When they go low. We go microp*nis. That’s the way it’s going to be.” “So you cannot be part of the MAGA movement if you speak ill of Mark Levin. That’s where we are. That doesn’t hurt me at all. I’ve not been part of the MAGA movement. Again, I will stay MAGA-adjacent, which is where I am happily, but he is going to further destroy his own coalition if he continues with this.”

RedWave Press

339,553 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Kenny Smith says Michael Jordan is the only player who came into the league where his weaknesses when he left the league were his strengths "this is to me what makes him the greatest player in the world...most guys come in with the strength and they get better at it" "his ball handler was good but then it became great...his shot was inconsistent and then it became indefensible" "he's the only player I look at it like that...his post game there was no flaw...I didn't know he'd be that good but I know he was a hard worker"

Kenny Smith says Michael Jordan is the only player who came into the league where his weaknesses when he left the league were his strengths "this is to me what makes him the greatest player in the world...most guys come in with the strength and they get better at it" "his ball handler was good but then it became great...his shot was inconsistent and then it became indefensible" "he's the only player I look at it like that...his post game there was no flaw...I didn't know he'd be that good but I know he was a hard worker"

CreativeDude

149,377 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🎥 || Sebastian Vettel about what a win in Ferrari could mean to Lewis Hamilton. “The longer it takes, the harder it becomes.” “But I mentioned the example of 2021 and Lewis' character. You know, he has the incredible ability to reflect the situation he's in now, struggles he might have. And I think he's still in a point of his life where this is what he wants to do.” “I think he has a fair shot from his performance. But a lot of things need to come together. You need to have the team, you need to have the people, you need to, the timing needs to be on the sweet spot so it would be great. And I think he deserves if it comes together but we will find out.”

🎥 || Sebastian Vettel about what a win in Ferrari could mean to Lewis Hamilton. “The longer it takes, the harder it becomes.” “But I mentioned the example of 2021 and Lewis' character. You know, he has the incredible ability to reflect the situation he's in now, struggles he might have. And I think he's still in a point of his life where this is what he wants to do.” “I think he has a fair shot from his performance. But a lot of things need to come together. You need to have the team, you need to have the people, you need to, the timing needs to be on the sweet spot so it would be great. And I think he deserves if it comes together but we will find out.”

sin ⁴⁴

54,006 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten