Coleman: Both sides use absolutely extreme rhetoric McGowan: I’m absolutely exhausted by the both sides thing. This is literally insane. You have Harris up there saying we can move forward and this guy is saying people are scum…

Trump quotes Hitler. Dems: Trump quoted Hitler. Media: Both sides need to tone down the rhetoric. Trump needs to stop quoting Hitler, and the Dems need to stop accusing him of quoting Hitler.

It's definitely not both sides. Demonizing an entire group of people and communities of people, lying, and fear mongering is only occurring with Republicans. The rhetoric is nasty.

She's 100% correct Trump is the dystopian candidate Harris is the constructive future forward candidate

It’s nonsense to compare the two sides. MAGA is dangerous.

Enough with the ‘both sides’ nonsense. One side’s talking about moving forward, the other’s busy calling people scum. If you’re still on the fence, maybe it’s time to check your moral compass, not the headlines.

That Coleman dude claims he’s not MAGA.

We have both sides this so much that trump trying to steal an election is acceptable.

He can't win on his appalling record. He can't win on his repulsive character. He can only win if he ignites in you what he is consumed by. Hate.

In essence, while Coleman sees the use of extreme rhetoric as a common, if not expected, political strategy, McGowan's reaction underscores a growing impatience with this narrative, suggesting that not all forms of extreme rhetoric are created equal in their impact or morality. This conversation reflects a wider societal debate on political discourse, its effects, and how it should be managed or moderated in democratic societies.

That's because Colmean is a lazy hack desperate for attention, whose never actually done anything