Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Combat Medic Granhildr Fated Guest Interaction #browndust2 #browndust #ブラウンダスト2 #Granhildr

18,800 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

OVERLOOKED CHARLIE KIRK CRIME SCENE REWIND: Russell Kennington, an 8-year US Army combat medic, was arrested trespassing onto the Charlie Kirk crime scene the morning after the ass*ssination. He had to cross 2 sets of crime scene barriers complete with the yellow tape. Kennington was charged with capital obstruction of justice, a first degree felony, and criminal trespass, a misdemeanor—but both charges were dropped that same day & he was released. In the arrest video, an officer carries a tagged gun that appears to be very light, as he's leisurely holding it with one finger. No gun is mentioned in the arrest or booking records, and UVU has no records related to this arrest—even though UVU is required by law to have documented the incident. I. HAVE. SO. MANY. QUESTIONS. ▪️Why does an army veteran leave his civilian job during the workday to go criminally trespass onto a high-profile crime scene under active investigation? ▪️Did Kennington bring the gun, or was it retrieved at the crime scene? ▪️What happened to the gun? ▪️Why doesn't UVU have any record of this incident? ▪️Who decided to drop the charges & let him go the same day? Was it Governor Cox & the FBI who we now know ordered the rapid destruction & paving over of the crime scene? ▪️What more are they covering up? ▪️Why was he really there? Do you think you could trespass, with a gun, onto the fresh crime scene of the ass*ssination of the century, and the police would just let you go after arresting you? Would it even enter your brain to attempt it? What was really going on here?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

178,271 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. Hamas' political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, was assassinated while he was in Iran for the inauguration of their new president, Masoud Pezeshkian. A missile struck his bedroom while he was staying at an IRGC guest house. 2. Iran vowed revenge for the assassination of Haniyeh and declared 3 days of official mourning for him. 3. Several world leaders condemned the assassination of Haniyeh, with the PM of Qatar asking how peace talks can work if Israel kills the negotiator. 4. Israel killed Fuad Shukr, who served as the right-hand man to Hezbollah's Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, in an airstrike on Beirut. 5. Protests continued in Venezuela over the presidential elections that are widely seen as being rigged. Gunfire was exchanged between protesters and Maduro's paramilitary forces in Caracas. 6. Trump said that the U.S had become a dumping ground. "They're coming from all over the world. The world is dumping their prisoners and their criminals into the United States." 7. Russia launched the third stage of its training exercises using tactical nuclear missiles. It aims to maintain the readiness of personnel and equipment of Russia's non-strategic nuclear weapons combat units. 8. Kari Lake won the Republican primary for the U.S Senate in Arizona. She defeated Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb and Elizabeth Jean Reye. 9. Overnight riots in Southport, the scene of a mass stabbing that killed 3 children, left 39 police officers injured. 10. Huw Edwards, once the BBC's most senior news presenter, pleaded guilty to 3 counts of making indecent images of children.

Mario Nawfal

225,669 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Piers Morgan keeps asking the same question in every interview: “Why is Israel intentionally killing civilians?” The answer is always the same. Israel is not targeting civilians. But Piers Morgan does not accept that. He cites the Hamas-run “Palestinian Ministry of Health” or “UK doctors operating in Gaza” as if British surgeons in a war zone can somehow tell whether a bullet came from Hamas or the IDF. When a guest says they do not trust Hamas’ numbers, Piers quickly shifts to his next question: “Then why won’t Israel let journalists into Gaza?” Here is the truth. Israel actually does allow journalists into Gaza, but not freely. They must coordinate, be escorted, and follow safety protocols. Piers then compares this to journalists visiting Israeli communities after October 7. That is a completely different situation. There were no ongoing combat operations, no terrorists hiding nearby, and no risk to Israeli troops or reporters. Then Piers says, “Let the journalists decide for themselves.” That might sound good on air, but it ignores reality. Here is why journalists cannot enter Gaza freely. The risks are real, and the cost far outweighs the benefit. 1. Gaza is an active combat zone No army on Earth allows reporters to wander freely in the middle of live military operations. The IDF is engaged in direct fighting with terror cells. Journalists could be killed or compromise critical missions. 2. Hamas controls everything There is no such thing as a free press in Gaza. Reporters are censored, monitored, and threatened. If they film rocket launches or armed fighters, they risk being detained or expelled. Most know this and self-censor. The result is pure propaganda. 3. Hamas hides behind civilians Terrorists wear civilian clothes and operate from civilian buildings. That makes it impossible for reporters to tell who is who, and it leads to heavily distorted reporting. 4. Hostage operations are ongoing There are still hostages being held inside Gaza. Journalists moving around freely could unknowingly expose special forces missions, rescue routes, or intelligence collection. 5. Hamas is a danger to journalists There is a real risk of kidnapping, hostage-taking, or worse. If anything happens, Israel would be blamed, even if it had no control. Hamas would use it for political leverage and media attention. 6. Military secrecy is critical Letting journalists film combat zones in real time would reveal IDF positions, tunnel clearing operations, or drone movements. That puts lives at risk and hands valuable intel to the enemy. 7. Legal and diplomatic fallout If a journalist is killed in Gaza, Israel is the one the world turns on. Lawsuits, outrage, and diplomatic pressure would follow immediately, even if Hamas was responsible. 8. The double standard is obvious No one allows free press access to Russian frontlines, Chinese military zones, or US drone strike areas. But Israel is constantly criticized for following the same basic security rules. So no, Piers. Letting journalists “decide for themselves” is not a solution. This is not a panel discussion. This is war. And in war, protecting lives comes first. It comes before press access, before media narratives, and definitely before letting journalists wander into combat zones just to “verify” what they already think they know. Why would Israel take the risk of journalists unintentionally (or intentionally) exposing troop positions or feeding Hamas coordinates? The reality is, the press as you and I know, has not proven itself a friend to Israel. And beyond that, the idea of reporters roaming freely through Gaza in the middle of battle is not journalism. It is insanity.

Open Source Intel

1,179,574 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce