正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Commandeering a private residence through “squatting” is a scam that violates private property rights. While some states are choosing to indulge this behavior, Florida is putting an end to it. Stay tuned…

Ron DeSantis

6,021,338 subscribers

1,384,901 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生喜剧

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Dustin Grage 的头像

Dustin Grage2 年前

I’m not tired of the winning. Ron DeSantis is the future of the Republican Party.

Unfiltered☢Boss 的头像

Unfiltered☢Boss2 年前

Ron DeSantis is the Gold Standard of conservativism. Keep up the great work sir.

J O H A N N E S 的头像

J O H A N N E S2 年前

Millions of Florida homes are second homes. Legal protections are a must to protect those home owners in Florida. DeSantis as always on the side of citizens, not criminals.

KayDreamer 的头像

KayDreamer2 年前

Florida has too many vacation homes to tolerate any form of squatting

Independent Unity Truthtellers | 2.0 | 🇺🇸 的头像

Independent Unity Truthtellers | 2.0 | 🇺🇸2 年前

The Nations' Best Governor. #HandsDown is @RonDeSantis who will make the Nations' Best President some day in the future!

Jaimee Michell 的头像

Jaimee Michell2 年前

Always leading the way. Proud to be a DeSantis Republican.

Chrysippus 的头像

Chrysippus2 年前

You are the future of the Republican Party, sir.

Janine Curran 的头像

Janine Curran2 年前

Thank you Governor DeSantis for setting the standard once again. Individual property rights are supposed to be a given in the U.S. Sadly, that is no longer the case. Hopefully my own state will follow Florida’s lead soon.

Joey Balls 的头像

Joey Balls2 年前

It’s unreal that other states let people have their property commandeered so easily. Thanks, Gov!

Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today 的头像

Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today2 年前

Legend

相关视频

Strong private property rights are essential to a free society. That’s why we have ended the squatters scam in Florida.

Strong private property rights are essential to a free society. That’s why we have ended the squatters scam in Florida.

Ron DeSantis

322,961 次观看 • 2 年前

The Eby NDP is undermining YOUR private property rights. The Haida deal means First Nations title could end up being applied to ALL private property in BC… This is a mess. #bcpoli

The Eby NDP is undermining YOUR private property rights. The Haida deal means First Nations title could end up being applied to ALL private property in BC… This is a mess. #bcpoli

John Rustad

205,120 次观看 • 2 年前

David Friedberg: The Socialists Are Coming for Your Private Property Rights At a recent hearing held by NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a speaker equated evictions with violence. david friedberg says this demonization of landlords and the good/evil moralistic framing are signals that socialists are trying to erode private property rights in America. “In 1787, John Quincy Adams had a comment, ‘The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.’ Private property rights are the foundations of liberty in America. Because if you think about where everyone that came to America was coming from, there were these tyrannical governments where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take the things that you have. You had no private property rights as an individual. And it was that stasis that drove so many to come to the United States and say, ‘We want a place where individuals, one person, can say, I own something, and no one can take it from me.’ This idea that you can then claim acts of violence, that you can then claim circumstances of extraordinary extravagant wealth, and say to that individual, ‘I now have a right, the government now has a right to take your private property,’ ultimately leads to this tyrannical form. And it starts out as being anarchic, and remember, anarchy is a temporary state. It's always in between one state and another. All anarchies end up in tyranny, so anarchy and tyranny are one in the same. And fundamentally, what's going on with these socialist principles is that, ‘We are taking your private property, and you no longer have rights on your private property. We now will have the right to come in and take your property and control it and take it from you.’ And it always starts with this framing of moralistic intent. ‘We are good, you are bad for the following reasons. You have committed violence against the people that live in your building.’ So the first framing is that the private property owner is evil, and that the private property owner has committed an act of injustice against those who don't have the private property. And that is the justification for taking away their private property rights. And it is the beginning of this transition towards a tyrannical system, which will ultimately be what I call this kind of Great American Politburo or whatever socialist framework gets set up by the cabal of the socialists and what they're trying to put together. So all of these little acts, while seeming ridiculous, and insane, and inappropriate, in aggregate are the same thing: They're a transition away from private property rights, which is the foundation of the United States of America. That's why I think we should all be so shocked. And to John Quincy Adams' point, we need to vehemently defend those rights. As soon as those rights start to slip away, even in the tiniest way, it is a cascading effect, and everything will become tyrannical, and it will be very ugly in the United States of America.”

David Friedberg: The Socialists Are Coming for Your Private Property Rights At a recent hearing held by NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a speaker equated evictions with violence. david friedberg says this demonization of landlords and the good/evil moralistic framing are signals that socialists are trying to erode private property rights in America. “In 1787, John Quincy Adams had a comment, ‘The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.’ Private property rights are the foundations of liberty in America. Because if you think about where everyone that came to America was coming from, there were these tyrannical governments where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take the things that you have. You had no private property rights as an individual. And it was that stasis that drove so many to come to the United States and say, ‘We want a place where individuals, one person, can say, I own something, and no one can take it from me.’ This idea that you can then claim acts of violence, that you can then claim circumstances of extraordinary extravagant wealth, and say to that individual, ‘I now have a right, the government now has a right to take your private property,’ ultimately leads to this tyrannical form. And it starts out as being anarchic, and remember, anarchy is a temporary state. It's always in between one state and another. All anarchies end up in tyranny, so anarchy and tyranny are one in the same. And fundamentally, what's going on with these socialist principles is that, ‘We are taking your private property, and you no longer have rights on your private property. We now will have the right to come in and take your property and control it and take it from you.’ And it always starts with this framing of moralistic intent. ‘We are good, you are bad for the following reasons. You have committed violence against the people that live in your building.’ So the first framing is that the private property owner is evil, and that the private property owner has committed an act of injustice against those who don't have the private property. And that is the justification for taking away their private property rights. And it is the beginning of this transition towards a tyrannical system, which will ultimately be what I call this kind of Great American Politburo or whatever socialist framework gets set up by the cabal of the socialists and what they're trying to put together. So all of these little acts, while seeming ridiculous, and insane, and inappropriate, in aggregate are the same thing: They're a transition away from private property rights, which is the foundation of the United States of America. That's why I think we should all be so shocked. And to John Quincy Adams' point, we need to vehemently defend those rights. As soon as those rights start to slip away, even in the tiniest way, it is a cascading effect, and everything will become tyrannical, and it will be very ugly in the United States of America.”

The All-In Podcast

176,370 次观看 • 7 天前

This is who Mamdani appointed to take away your private property rights in NYC. That’s not me saying it, this is her saying it directly.

This is who Mamdani appointed to take away your private property rights in NYC. That’s not me saying it, this is her saying it directly.

Insurrection Barbie

11,635 次观看 • 6 个月前

Is this not the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard? In fact it is easier for a 13 year old kid to buy a gun than it is for them to buy Sudafed in some states. In some states, a 13-year-old can walk into a gun show and LEGALLY buy a gun from a private seller. Don’t believe me? Watch this 7-year old video below. The sale of firearms by private sellers, often referred to as "private sales" or "private transfers," is subject to state laws, and regulations can vary significantly from one state to another. In some states, it is legal for someone under 18 to purchase a firearm from a private seller. Federal law does generally prohibits the sale of guns to individuals under 18. However, there are some exceptions and variations in state laws. Private sales are one of those exceptions, and in many states private sales can take place at gun shows without a background check being required. Can anyone honestly say they are OK with this?

Is this not the most ridiculous thing you’ve ever heard? In fact it is easier for a 13 year old kid to buy a gun than it is for them to buy Sudafed in some states. In some states, a 13-year-old can walk into a gun show and LEGALLY buy a gun from a private seller. Don’t believe me? Watch this 7-year old video below. The sale of firearms by private sellers, often referred to as "private sales" or "private transfers," is subject to state laws, and regulations can vary significantly from one state to another. In some states, it is legal for someone under 18 to purchase a firearm from a private seller. Federal law does generally prohibits the sale of guns to individuals under 18. However, there are some exceptions and variations in state laws. Private sales are one of those exceptions, and in many states private sales can take place at gun shows without a background check being required. Can anyone honestly say they are OK with this?

Ed Krassenstein

727,863 次观看 • 2 年前

Private property rights are foundational to our country. Canada is a legitimate nation, and we are entitled to be here. Our citizenship carries weight and value.

Private property rights are foundational to our country. Canada is a legitimate nation, and we are entitled to be here. Our citizenship carries weight and value.

Jamil Jivani

24,422 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is a blatant abuse of the First Amendment. Free speech restrains the government. It does not give you permission to trespass, disrupt private property, or hijack a church service. Churches have rights too. The right to worship. The right to assemble. The right to be left alone. Your rights end where other people’s rights begin.. Calling illegal behavior “journalism” or “protest” doesn’t magically make it legal.

This is a blatant abuse of the First Amendment. Free speech restrains the government. It does not give you permission to trespass, disrupt private property, or hijack a church service. Churches have rights too. The right to worship. The right to assemble. The right to be left alone. Your rights end where other people’s rights begin.. Calling illegal behavior “journalism” or “protest” doesn’t magically make it legal.

Jeffery Mead

235,627 次观看 • 6 个月前

"#Bitcoin is here to stay, and self-custody of digital private property is a fundamental right." - Pascal Gauthier @Ledger

"#Bitcoin is here to stay, and self-custody of digital private property is a fundamental right." - Pascal Gauthier @Ledger

Michael Saylor

244,169 次观看 • 2 年前

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: "Private establishments can partner with us to make it clear that private property is private property and ICE cannot enter establishments without a valid warrant ... If Congress will not check this administration, then Chicago will."

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson: "Private establishments can partner with us to make it clear that private property is private property and ICE cannot enter establishments without a valid warrant ... If Congress will not check this administration, then Chicago will."

Heartland Signal

57,094 次观看 • 9 个月前

What Elon Musk says here is wrong. The limiting factor for an economy to turn labor into goods is the strength of the promise known as private property. By offering a credible promise that the fruits of their labor will not be stolen, strong private property incentivizes people to be productive. Printing money steals the fruits of peoples’ labor, thereby weakening the promise of private property. As private property is weakened through money printing, people are more incentivized to steal rather than produce. After all, if the promise of legal ownership is being broken, then why work at all when you can instead get in on the take (through bailouts, subsidies, welfare, etc)? When the promise of private property is strong, capital is accumulated rather than consumed, thereby intensifying productivity. #Bitcoin is money that is extremely difficult to steal and impossible to print. Therefore, Bitcoin is the perfection of private property and an intensification of the productive output of people worldwide.

What Elon Musk says here is wrong. The limiting factor for an economy to turn labor into goods is the strength of the promise known as private property. By offering a credible promise that the fruits of their labor will not be stolen, strong private property incentivizes people to be productive. Printing money steals the fruits of peoples’ labor, thereby weakening the promise of private property. As private property is weakened through money printing, people are more incentivized to steal rather than produce. After all, if the promise of legal ownership is being broken, then why work at all when you can instead get in on the take (through bailouts, subsidies, welfare, etc)? When the promise of private property is strong, capital is accumulated rather than consumed, thereby intensifying productivity. #Bitcoin is money that is extremely difficult to steal and impossible to print. Therefore, Bitcoin is the perfection of private property and an intensification of the productive output of people worldwide.

Robert ₿reedlove

46,055 次观看 • 1 年前

This guy says Canada is going to end up like Rhodesia where all private property is handed to the Indigenous.

This guy says Canada is going to end up like Rhodesia where all private property is handed to the Indigenous.

pocket aces

28,128 次观看 • 4 个月前

David Friedberg cites John Quincy Adams on property rights as the foundation of liberty "The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." "Fundamental to the foundation of the USA was this idea of private property rights, because if you think about where everybody was coming from, they were these tyrannical governments, monarchies, where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take what you have. You had no property rights as an individual." "That stasis drove so many to come to the USA and say, we want a place where individuals can say, I own something and no one can take it from me." "Private property rights are the foundation of liberty." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

David Friedberg cites John Quincy Adams on property rights as the foundation of liberty "The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence." "Fundamental to the foundation of the USA was this idea of private property rights, because if you think about where everybody was coming from, they were these tyrannical governments, monarchies, where some overlord or some cabal could decide at any point to take what you have. You had no property rights as an individual." "That stasis drove so many to come to the USA and say, we want a place where individuals can say, I own something and no one can take it from me." "Private property rights are the foundation of liberty." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

54,816 次观看 • 7 天前

WTF!: Today I drove into a private Khalistan community in rural Nova Scotia. This town has a population of less than 500 people. I drove up to the end of this road and there was a gate with a private property sign which lead to a private residence. The flags gave such a cult vibe.

WTF!: Today I drove into a private Khalistan community in rural Nova Scotia. This town has a population of less than 500 people. I drove up to the end of this road and there was a gate with a private property sign which lead to a private residence. The flags gave such a cult vibe.

Society Unveiled

93,147 次观看 • 1 个月前

The NDP’s assault on your private property rights continues. I’ll put a stop to it. 👉 Join me:

The NDP’s assault on your private property rights continues. I’ll put a stop to it. 👉 Join me:

Caroline Elliott

46,801 次观看 • 6 个月前

David Friedberg warns that Mamdani and fellow socialists frame their assaults on private property as moral justice against “evil” landlords and the wealthy. This is one of the best breakdowns on Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists I've seen. Must watch! Friedberg: “This idea that you can then claim acts of violence—that you can then claim circumstances of extraordinary, extravagant wealth and say to that individual, ‘I now have a right—the government has a right—to take your private property’ ultimately leads to this tyrannical form. And it starts out as being anarchic because, remember, anarchy is a temporary state—it’s always between one state and another. All anarchies end up in tyranny. Groups of people fighting each other. They’re all stealing **** from each other. Everyone just goes and takes and gets what they want, and eventually people coalesce. They form groups, and those groups become the more powerful groups. And the powerful groups end up winning. And they become the tyranny over the mass. And that is why all anarchies eventually evolve into tyranny. So anarchy and tyranny are one and the same. And fundamentally what’s going on with these socialist principles is that we are taking your private property, and you no longer have rights to your private property—whether you are a landlord or whether you are a wealthy person that we’ve deemed to have too much wealth. We now have the rights to come in and take your property and control it and take it from you. And it always starts with this framing of moralistic intent: ‘We are good and you are bad for the following reason. You have committed violence against the people; in your building you have taken too much wealth. And none of us have wealth. We have a right to go and take your wealth from you.’ It has always started from this point of view that you are bad. So the first framing is that the private property owner is evil and that the private property owner has committed an act of injustice against those who don’t have the private property, and that is the justification for taking away their private property rights. And it is the beginning of this transition towards a tyrannical system which will ultimately be what I call this kind of great American Politburo or whatever socialist framework gets set up by the cabal of the socialists and what they’re trying to put together. So all of these little acts, while seeming ridiculous and insane and inappropriate, in aggregate are the same thing. They are the transitioning away from private property rights, which is the foundation of the United States of America. That’s why I think we should all be so shocked. And to the point of John Quincy Adams’s point, we need to vehemently defend those rights. As soon as those rights start to slip away, even in the tiniest way, it is a cascading effect and everything will become tyrannical. And it will be very ugly in the United States of America.”

David Friedberg warns that Mamdani and fellow socialists frame their assaults on private property as moral justice against “evil” landlords and the wealthy. This is one of the best breakdowns on Mamdani and the Democratic Socialists I've seen. Must watch! Friedberg: “This idea that you can then claim acts of violence—that you can then claim circumstances of extraordinary, extravagant wealth and say to that individual, ‘I now have a right—the government has a right—to take your private property’ ultimately leads to this tyrannical form. And it starts out as being anarchic because, remember, anarchy is a temporary state—it’s always between one state and another. All anarchies end up in tyranny. Groups of people fighting each other. They’re all stealing **** from each other. Everyone just goes and takes and gets what they want, and eventually people coalesce. They form groups, and those groups become the more powerful groups. And the powerful groups end up winning. And they become the tyranny over the mass. And that is why all anarchies eventually evolve into tyranny. So anarchy and tyranny are one and the same. And fundamentally what’s going on with these socialist principles is that we are taking your private property, and you no longer have rights to your private property—whether you are a landlord or whether you are a wealthy person that we’ve deemed to have too much wealth. We now have the rights to come in and take your property and control it and take it from you. And it always starts with this framing of moralistic intent: ‘We are good and you are bad for the following reason. You have committed violence against the people; in your building you have taken too much wealth. And none of us have wealth. We have a right to go and take your wealth from you.’ It has always started from this point of view that you are bad. So the first framing is that the private property owner is evil and that the private property owner has committed an act of injustice against those who don’t have the private property, and that is the justification for taking away their private property rights. And it is the beginning of this transition towards a tyrannical system which will ultimately be what I call this kind of great American Politburo or whatever socialist framework gets set up by the cabal of the socialists and what they’re trying to put together. So all of these little acts, while seeming ridiculous and insane and inappropriate, in aggregate are the same thing. They are the transitioning away from private property rights, which is the foundation of the United States of America. That’s why I think we should all be so shocked. And to the point of John Quincy Adams’s point, we need to vehemently defend those rights. As soon as those rights start to slip away, even in the tiniest way, it is a cascading effect and everything will become tyrannical. And it will be very ugly in the United States of America.”

American Debunk

15,277 次观看 • 7 天前

Cemetery visit ends in police escalation “you are trespassing, you’re not supposed to be here, this is a private property”

Cemetery visit ends in police escalation “you are trespassing, you’re not supposed to be here, this is a private property”

Loud Outside

364,830 次观看 • 2 个月前

This money is enough to set up a private equity that can revive some companies and get it functioning. When are we going to delve into this corporate rescue?

This money is enough to set up a private equity that can revive some companies and get it functioning. When are we going to delve into this corporate rescue?

Anambra 1st son

60,925 次观看 • 29 天前

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

🚨We keep hearing claims that the Cowichan “don’t want” the affected Richmond PRIVATE PROPERTY. That misses the point entirely. The court has granted ABORIGINAL TITLE over the affected private property in RICHMOND. Whether the COWICHAN choose to exercise that right to that private property is irrelevant — the legal right now exists and may be accessed. This COWICHAN DECISION directly affects the families who own those affected private properties, and it should concern all British Columbians. With 95% of British Columbia exposed to Indigenous land claims, this ruling creates UNCERTAINTY that can be repeated in other communities across the province. The NDP government should have acted to protect PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS before this issue reached a court ruling.

Steve Kooner MLA

10,167 次观看 • 7 个月前

🏠 The DA is taking action to amend a law that has long protected illegal land invaders. Through a Private Members Bill in Parliament, the DA is working to reform the flawed PIE Act, restoring fairness, protecting property rights, and protecting YOU from criminal land grabs.

🏠 The DA is taking action to amend a law that has long protected illegal land invaders. Through a Private Members Bill in Parliament, the DA is working to reform the flawed PIE Act, restoring fairness, protecting property rights, and protecting YOU from criminal land grabs.

Democratic Alliance

14,632 次观看 • 1 年前

And so it begins…independent journalist and private detective Candace Owens states she has proof the Somalian Day Care Scam is actually a double scam and that Israel is behind it — you go girl. Candace Owens

And so it begins…independent journalist and private detective Candace Owens states she has proof the Somalian Day Care Scam is actually a double scam and that Israel is behind it — you go girl. Candace Owens

DFF

558,868 次观看 • 7 个月前