Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: ‘India’s🇮🇳 calculus: going slow on relations with Iran to maintain ties with Washington🇺🇸.’ ‘The US has been applying these very harsh tariffs across the world on almost all its allies. So India has had to make a broad macro assessment about how it would...

NewOrder_TV's profile picture

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

4,017 subscribers

14,412 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 NEW EPISODE OF NEW ORDER 🌐 BRICS ‘UP & RUNNING’: How India🇮🇳 Will Navigate US-Iran Conflict & Tensions With Trump—C. Uday Bhaskar How is India navigating maintaining ties with the US while being the Chair of BRICS in 2026? What’s next for India-Iran relations after the US-Israeli war on Iran? What’s India’s strategy for navigating increasing threats from the USA? We discuss all this and more with Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies. C Uday Bhaskar
27:50

🚨 NEW EPISODE OF NEW ORDER 🌐 BRICS ‘UP & RUNNING’: How India🇮🇳 Will Navigate US-Iran Conflict & Tensions With Trump—C. Uday Bhaskar How is India navigating maintaining ties with the US while being the Chair of BRICS in 2026? What’s next for India-Iran relations after the US-Israeli war on Iran? What’s India’s strategy for navigating increasing threats from the USA? We discuss all this and more with Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies. C Uday Bhaskar

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

228,024 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: India🇮🇳 has NOT given up on Chabahar Port in Iran, it remains an IMPORTANT strategic priority 'Attributes of Chabahar are very important for India. So I don't see that being diluted, whether or not we'd be able to pursue it in the current framework when Iran is also recovering and needs to have its own infrastructure brought back. That is something that we would know in the next few months. In the long term, Chabahar remains a very important strategic investment for India. Iran is cognisant of the potential of Chabahar in the bilateral relationship, as also India's connectivity with Central Asia. So, a few years down the road, I wouldn't say that India doesn't care about Chabahar. India has not been able to give it the traction that we had hoped that we could. And for the long term, Chabahar remains an important strategic priority for India.' -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar
2:16

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: India🇮🇳 has NOT given up on Chabahar Port in Iran, it remains an IMPORTANT strategic priority 'Attributes of Chabahar are very important for India. So I don't see that being diluted, whether or not we'd be able to pursue it in the current framework when Iran is also recovering and needs to have its own infrastructure brought back. That is something that we would know in the next few months. In the long term, Chabahar remains a very important strategic investment for India. Iran is cognisant of the potential of Chabahar in the bilateral relationship, as also India's connectivity with Central Asia. So, a few years down the road, I wouldn't say that India doesn't care about Chabahar. India has not been able to give it the traction that we had hoped that we could. And for the long term, Chabahar remains an important strategic priority for India.' -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

23,703 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: Modi & India’s🇮🇳 ‘DIGNIFIED SILENCE’ in the face of Trump’s threats 'India does realise that many of the actions that the United States has taken ever since President Donald Trump has come to the White House have adversely impacted India's core interests, particularly in the economic domain, because of the high and harsh tariffs. It has had an impact on human security in India across a very large demographic. What India has also internalised is that many of these discordant issues with the United States are better discussed in private. Both President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Modi have made a choice, definitely from India's side, that whatever be the difficult issues, we would keep them off the public radar. When the seafarers were killed because of a US missile attack, there was anger and anguish in India, but India took it up very prudently at the level of the foreign minister. India has chosen to internalise this and take these matters up in private, quiet diplomacy, and not make any public statements. Because the last time around, after Operation Sindoor had ended, President Trump had claimed that he had ended the war and that perhaps he qualified for a Nobel Peace Prize, and India had not endorsed it. This led to a lot of what you might call turbulence in the bilateral relationship. You will find that Prime Minister Modi has maintained what you might call a very dignified silence, even when President Trump responded the way he did, when the issue of Indian sailors who were killed in a US missile attack was raised.' -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar
2:44

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: Modi & India’s🇮🇳 ‘DIGNIFIED SILENCE’ in the face of Trump’s threats 'India does realise that many of the actions that the United States has taken ever since President Donald Trump has come to the White House have adversely impacted India's core interests, particularly in the economic domain, because of the high and harsh tariffs. It has had an impact on human security in India across a very large demographic. What India has also internalised is that many of these discordant issues with the United States are better discussed in private. Both President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Modi have made a choice, definitely from India's side, that whatever be the difficult issues, we would keep them off the public radar. When the seafarers were killed because of a US missile attack, there was anger and anguish in India, but India took it up very prudently at the level of the foreign minister. India has chosen to internalise this and take these matters up in private, quiet diplomacy, and not make any public statements. Because the last time around, after Operation Sindoor had ended, President Trump had claimed that he had ended the war and that perhaps he qualified for a Nobel Peace Prize, and India had not endorsed it. This led to a lot of what you might call turbulence in the bilateral relationship. You will find that Prime Minister Modi has maintained what you might call a very dignified silence, even when President Trump responded the way he did, when the issue of Indian sailors who were killed in a US missile attack was raised.' -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

28,384 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: India🇮🇳-UAE🇦🇪 security ties have STRENGTHENED under Modi and BRICS umbrella, show’s India’s CREDIBILITY as a security partner’ ‘Talking about the bilateral military relationship, the UAE now has Indian officers doing training for their military personnel, including their air force, whereas earlier it was Pakistan, which is indicative of the slow changes, the shifts that are taking place even in West Asia. Specific to the BrahMos, India has now exported or has finalised the deal, as far as Southeast Asia is concerned, and the Philippines has been a country that has chosen the BrahMos. So it is one of the success stories. The BrahMos weapon is also a joint India-Russia venture. Countries like the UAE and others are looking at this as an option, which is indicative of the credibility of India as a military partner for countries that are seeking this kind of capability.’ -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar
2:00

🚨 Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar: India🇮🇳-UAE🇦🇪 security ties have STRENGTHENED under Modi and BRICS umbrella, show’s India’s CREDIBILITY as a security partner’ ‘Talking about the bilateral military relationship, the UAE now has Indian officers doing training for their military personnel, including their air force, whereas earlier it was Pakistan, which is indicative of the slow changes, the shifts that are taking place even in West Asia. Specific to the BrahMos, India has now exported or has finalised the deal, as far as Southeast Asia is concerned, and the Philippines has been a country that has chosen the BrahMos. So it is one of the success stories. The BrahMos weapon is also a joint India-Russia venture. Countries like the UAE and others are looking at this as an option, which is indicative of the credibility of India as a military partner for countries that are seeking this kind of capability.’ -Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar, Director of the Society for Policy Studies, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 C Uday Bhaskar

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

28,928 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sarang Shidore: Chabahar is just ONE of many casualties of Washington's ILL-CONCEIVED project to isolate Iran🇮🇷 'The point is that fundamentally this war has a lot of collateral damage. The war was driven by factors that have little to do with India. It was driven by the situation in the Middle East and the United States' priorities for a long time for overthrowing the power of Iran in the region. India is one of the countries among many others. In fact, the whole world. But even before that, the relationship of Iran in terms of energy with India and other countries was damaged. China continued to buy Iranian oil. It still does. So I think the collateral damage has been happening for years on this. The attempt has been to isolate Iran from its region where it lives. And India is the biggest country in the region essentially, in terms of population and the economy, next to China. And that has succeeded partially.' -Sarang Shidore, Director of the Global South Program at the Quincy Institute, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇
2:15

Sarang Shidore: Chabahar is just ONE of many casualties of Washington's ILL-CONCEIVED project to isolate Iran🇮🇷 'The point is that fundamentally this war has a lot of collateral damage. The war was driven by factors that have little to do with India. It was driven by the situation in the Middle East and the United States' priorities for a long time for overthrowing the power of Iran in the region. India is one of the countries among many others. In fact, the whole world. But even before that, the relationship of Iran in terms of energy with India and other countries was damaged. China continued to buy Iranian oil. It still does. So I think the collateral damage has been happening for years on this. The attempt has been to isolate Iran from its region where it lives. And India is the biggest country in the region essentially, in terms of population and the economy, next to China. And that has succeeded partially.' -Sarang Shidore, Director of the Global South Program at the Quincy Institute, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

19,475 görüntüleme • 11 saat önce

🚨 Ambassador Kanwal Sibal: India🇮🇳 will BUY Iran’s🇮🇷 oil after sanctions are lifted, which will REINFORCE our ties with Iran’ 'The end of sanctions will mean extra impetus for India. As also for Chabahar Port once the sanctions are lifted. And, if India begins to buy Iranian oil, don't forget that, until America forced us to stop buying oil from Iran, Iran was the second largest supplier of oil to India. And at times even the largest. So that oil can become available to India. That will reinforce our ties with Iran, and then that will have a very positive impact on the rest of the relationship in terms of also developing and promoting these kinds of corridors through Iran. So to that extent, yes, the prospects are good.' -Amb. Kanwal Sibal, Former Foreign Secretary of India on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Kanwal Sibal
2:57

🚨 Ambassador Kanwal Sibal: India🇮🇳 will BUY Iran’s🇮🇷 oil after sanctions are lifted, which will REINFORCE our ties with Iran’ 'The end of sanctions will mean extra impetus for India. As also for Chabahar Port once the sanctions are lifted. And, if India begins to buy Iranian oil, don't forget that, until America forced us to stop buying oil from Iran, Iran was the second largest supplier of oil to India. And at times even the largest. So that oil can become available to India. That will reinforce our ties with Iran, and then that will have a very positive impact on the rest of the relationship in terms of also developing and promoting these kinds of corridors through Iran. So to that extent, yes, the prospects are good.' -Amb. Kanwal Sibal, Former Foreign Secretary of India on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇 Kanwal Sibal

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

47,020 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

#WATCH | New York | Adjunct Instructor, Centre for Global Affairs, School of Professional Studies, NYU and Independent Analyst, Edward Price says, "I used to think that US President Donald Trump had a very poor understanding of economics and I realise now that I was wrong. In fact, the US President has no understanding of economics, given the way he is behaving towards India...There is absolutely no reason, particularly in the current moment, to have the United States and India clash like this. It was not necessary and it was entirely the doing of the US side...India is a developing economy, so the entire conception of the post-war was that those economies that were developing, rather than developed, would get the ability to impose higher tariffs on goods. I really don't know what he is talking about and he has damaged the relationship between India and the United States. He either does not understand the US National Interest or is actively working against it..."
1:36

#WATCH | New York | Adjunct Instructor, Centre for Global Affairs, School of Professional Studies, NYU and Independent Analyst, Edward Price says, "I used to think that US President Donald Trump had a very poor understanding of economics and I realise now that I was wrong. In fact, the US President has no understanding of economics, given the way he is behaving towards India...There is absolutely no reason, particularly in the current moment, to have the United States and India clash like this. It was not necessary and it was entirely the doing of the US side...India is a developing economy, so the entire conception of the post-war was that those economies that were developing, rather than developed, would get the ability to impose higher tariffs on goods. I really don't know what he is talking about and he has damaged the relationship between India and the United States. He either does not understand the US National Interest or is actively working against it..."

ANI

16,790 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Iran: India🇮🇳 can be a PEACEMAKER, BRICS & India can stop the US’🇺🇸 DELUSIONS ‘India definitely has the stature, the power, the dignity, the precision to say no to American delusions. India is four times the United States in population. It is ten times, and longer actually, in its civilisational history. It can say to the United States, stop misbehaving. But I am suggesting that India do this together, not by itself, but together with Russia and with China, with Brazil, with the other BRICS countries. I’m saying that for a couple of reasons. First, institutionally, India is the President of the BRICS this year. I regard the BRICS as tremendously important, as consequential and as beneficial for the world, as a stabiliser for the world. Half the world’s population, half the world’s GDP, major countries. And to be able to say we’re not in a US-run world, we’re not in a world where the US can declare it’s going to put another country into the Stone Ages, we’re in a civilised world based on international law, on the UN Charter. So the BRICS presidency is a particular reason. Second, it isn’t pleasant dealing with Mr. Trump, I have no doubt about it. So it’s better to do it together with partners. I like to think of India and China and Russia as partners, not only as fellow members of the BRICS, but as partners in saying we want a multipolar world, not a world of blocs and not a world in which the United States continues its 30-plus-year delusion of hegemony. So to my mind, safety in numbers, good company, BRICS presidency. This is all a case for India’s leadership. I also happen to believe in India, that it can be a peacemaker, that it can really contribute consequentially. India’s relations with Persia also go back a very long way. And so India’s relations with Iran are deep and go back a long way.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
2:44

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on Iran: India🇮🇳 can be a PEACEMAKER, BRICS & India can stop the US’🇺🇸 DELUSIONS ‘India definitely has the stature, the power, the dignity, the precision to say no to American delusions. India is four times the United States in population. It is ten times, and longer actually, in its civilisational history. It can say to the United States, stop misbehaving. But I am suggesting that India do this together, not by itself, but together with Russia and with China, with Brazil, with the other BRICS countries. I’m saying that for a couple of reasons. First, institutionally, India is the President of the BRICS this year. I regard the BRICS as tremendously important, as consequential and as beneficial for the world, as a stabiliser for the world. Half the world’s population, half the world’s GDP, major countries. And to be able to say we’re not in a US-run world, we’re not in a world where the US can declare it’s going to put another country into the Stone Ages, we’re in a civilised world based on international law, on the UN Charter. So the BRICS presidency is a particular reason. Second, it isn’t pleasant dealing with Mr. Trump, I have no doubt about it. So it’s better to do it together with partners. I like to think of India and China and Russia as partners, not only as fellow members of the BRICS, but as partners in saying we want a multipolar world, not a world of blocs and not a world in which the United States continues its 30-plus-year delusion of hegemony. So to my mind, safety in numbers, good company, BRICS presidency. This is all a case for India’s leadership. I also happen to believe in India, that it can be a peacemaker, that it can really contribute consequentially. India’s relations with Persia also go back a very long way. And so India’s relations with Iran are deep and go back a long way.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

60,059 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Shashi Tharoor says India will back Arab nations over Iran "In the longer term, India's bed is made with the Arab side of the Gulf. It has 9 million citizens living there. There is investment coming in and oil and energy security. But India would like to preserve ties with Iran"
1:02

Shashi Tharoor says India will back Arab nations over Iran "In the longer term, India's bed is made with the Arab side of the Gulf. It has 9 million citizens living there. There is investment coming in and oil and energy security. But India would like to preserve ties with Iran"

Shashank Mattoo

201,111 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: On India-Maldives relations, former President Of The Republic Of Maldives, Mohamed Nasheed, says, "I don't think that Maldives can prosper without very good relations with India. Our safety, security, and prosperity rely on our good relations with India... The new government has also patched up their differences with India, and that's encouraging. There is still some difficulty with the new government in implementing the FTA with China; the impact that it will have, not only on the Maldives but also what it can mean to India..."
1:19

#WATCH | Delhi: On India-Maldives relations, former President Of The Republic Of Maldives, Mohamed Nasheed, says, "I don't think that Maldives can prosper without very good relations with India. Our safety, security, and prosperity rely on our good relations with India... The new government has also patched up their differences with India, and that's encouraging. There is still some difficulty with the new government in implementing the FTA with China; the impact that it will have, not only on the Maldives but also what it can mean to India..."

ANI

26,967 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Delhi: On US President Donald Trump's congratulatory tweet on him, Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, Taranjit Singh Sandhu says, "... I was sent as ambassador of India to the United States. I was selected by Prime Minister Modi. And the relationship between the United States and India is in the national interests of both countries. The Prime Minister's thinking is very clear. So many times he has enumerated it. I was merely performing my job. It is definitely a matter of satisfaction and happiness that President Trump, in his tweet, acknowledged that. But I would also like to mention that even President Biden has mentioned about the good work. We were able to successfully, under the guidance of the Prime Minister, convert the relationship into a partnership."
1:00

#WATCH | Delhi: On US President Donald Trump's congratulatory tweet on him, Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, Taranjit Singh Sandhu says, "... I was sent as ambassador of India to the United States. I was selected by Prime Minister Modi. And the relationship between the United States and India is in the national interests of both countries. The Prime Minister's thinking is very clear. So many times he has enumerated it. I was merely performing my job. It is definitely a matter of satisfaction and happiness that President Trump, in his tweet, acknowledged that. But I would also like to mention that even President Biden has mentioned about the good work. We were able to successfully, under the guidance of the Prime Minister, convert the relationship into a partnership."

ANI

97,842 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

#WATCH | Washington DC: BJP MP Tejasvi Surya says, "We had a fantastic meeting with the Vice President of the United States of America. Vice President Vance was unequivocal and categorical in his support for India's stance against terrorism. He was very clear that India exercised its right to deter further terrorist attacks from Pakistan and sympathised with the victims of the terror attack in Pahalgam. He mentioned that he himself was in India when the attack took place, and he was also a witness to the outrage and anger amongst the Indian people to this brutal and cruel terrorist attack. He also expressed complete support to the Government of India in its fight against terror. He was also greatly appreciative of the responsible restraint that India showed even after repeated provocations by Pakistan...he also expressed the enthusiasm that he and the Government of United States share insof far as trade with India is concerned, partnership with India is concerned and how he saw first hand the great vitality and strength in India and how India and the United States are natural partners in this journey in the coming years..."
2:19

#WATCH | Washington DC: BJP MP Tejasvi Surya says, "We had a fantastic meeting with the Vice President of the United States of America. Vice President Vance was unequivocal and categorical in his support for India's stance against terrorism. He was very clear that India exercised its right to deter further terrorist attacks from Pakistan and sympathised with the victims of the terror attack in Pahalgam. He mentioned that he himself was in India when the attack took place, and he was also a witness to the outrage and anger amongst the Indian people to this brutal and cruel terrorist attack. He also expressed complete support to the Government of India in its fight against terror. He was also greatly appreciative of the responsible restraint that India showed even after repeated provocations by Pakistan...he also expressed the enthusiasm that he and the Government of United States share insof far as trade with India is concerned, partnership with India is concerned and how he saw first hand the great vitality and strength in India and how India and the United States are natural partners in this journey in the coming years..."

ANI

15,944 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | New York | On US-Pak ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "...As we know, India quite some time ago accepted the fact that the US and Pakistan would have a friendly relationship, including a friendly military relationship. This resurgence in US-Pakistan ties has become a tension point in US-India relations, just because there are so many other bad things happening in US-India relations and also the US-Pakistan relationship has really strengthened very quickly in very big ways...If it is true that Prime Minister of Pakistan Shehbaz Sharif goes to Washington to meet with President Trump, that would be the latest indication of just how far this relationship has come...Honestly, after the meeting between President Trump and Field Marshal Munir, anything that comes after that would not be as significant, given how powerful Munir is..."
1:46

#WATCH | New York | On US-Pak ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "...As we know, India quite some time ago accepted the fact that the US and Pakistan would have a friendly relationship, including a friendly military relationship. This resurgence in US-Pakistan ties has become a tension point in US-India relations, just because there are so many other bad things happening in US-India relations and also the US-Pakistan relationship has really strengthened very quickly in very big ways...If it is true that Prime Minister of Pakistan Shehbaz Sharif goes to Washington to meet with President Trump, that would be the latest indication of just how far this relationship has come...Honestly, after the meeting between President Trump and Field Marshal Munir, anything that comes after that would not be as significant, given how powerful Munir is..."

ANI

85,023 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Sullivan: On a bipartisan basis, going back decades, the US has worked to build its relationship with India — the world’s largest democracy, a country we should be aligned with on technology, talent, economics, and so many other issues, and aligned with in dealing with the strategic threat from China. And we had come a long way on that. Now, in no small part, I think because of Pakistan’s willingness to do business deals with the Trump family, Trump has thrown the India relationship over the side. That is a huge strategic harm in its own right because a strong U.S.–India relationship serves our interests. But imagine every other country in the world — Germany, Japan, Canada. You look at that and you say: that could be us tomorrow. And that only reinforces your view that you’ve got to hedge against the United States. And when all of our friends and partners around the world decide they just can’t rely on the U.S. in any way, shape, or form — that is not in the interest of the American people long term. Our words should be our bond. We should be good for what we say. Our friends should be able to rely on us. That has always been our strength. What’s happening with India right now has huge direct impacts, but it also has this reverberating impact across all of our relationships and partnerships in the world.
2:17

Sullivan: On a bipartisan basis, going back decades, the US has worked to build its relationship with India — the world’s largest democracy, a country we should be aligned with on technology, talent, economics, and so many other issues, and aligned with in dealing with the strategic threat from China. And we had come a long way on that. Now, in no small part, I think because of Pakistan’s willingness to do business deals with the Trump family, Trump has thrown the India relationship over the side. That is a huge strategic harm in its own right because a strong U.S.–India relationship serves our interests. But imagine every other country in the world — Germany, Japan, Canada. You look at that and you say: that could be us tomorrow. And that only reinforces your view that you’ve got to hedge against the United States. And when all of our friends and partners around the world decide they just can’t rely on the U.S. in any way, shape, or form — that is not in the interest of the American people long term. Our words should be our bond. We should be good for what we say. Our friends should be able to rely on us. That has always been our strength. What’s happening with India right now has huge direct impacts, but it also has this reverberating impact across all of our relationships and partnerships in the world.

Acyn

47,836 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#WATCH | Washington DC | Senior Advisor at CSIS, Richard Rossow, says, "It looks like both sides have agreed for the US to get better market access into India, including dropping non-tariff barriers, as President Trump mentioned, and also removing most of the tariffs that the US had placed on India... What we don’t know is what other things were included. There’s also the agreement that India will buy $500 billion worth of American goods, but we don’t know the details of that or the time frame..." On Indian purchase of Russian oil, he says, "The previous times the US pressured India about where it was buying hydrocarbons, most notably from Venezuela and Iran, India complied when the US presented a real threat... From India’s perspective, the US is by far its most important export market in both goods and services... India got tariffs reduced in exchange for market access, which India has done with other trade partners. It’s a deal both leaders thought was worth finalising..."
1:53

#WATCH | Washington DC | Senior Advisor at CSIS, Richard Rossow, says, "It looks like both sides have agreed for the US to get better market access into India, including dropping non-tariff barriers, as President Trump mentioned, and also removing most of the tariffs that the US had placed on India... What we don’t know is what other things were included. There’s also the agreement that India will buy $500 billion worth of American goods, but we don’t know the details of that or the time frame..." On Indian purchase of Russian oil, he says, "The previous times the US pressured India about where it was buying hydrocarbons, most notably from Venezuela and Iran, India complied when the US presented a real threat... From India’s perspective, the US is by far its most important export market in both goods and services... India got tariffs reduced in exchange for market access, which India has done with other trade partners. It’s a deal both leaders thought was worth finalising..."

ANI

25,857 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Tucker Carlson suggests that Israel is looking for a New Global Superpower to leech onto because public support in the United States is slowly dying — they see the writing on the wall Tucker suggested two countries, China and India, ultimately narrowing it down to India. “It was probably no coincidence that the Prime Minister of India Modi spoke to the Kesset about the ‘ancient ties between Israel and India’.. bottom line, yes, Israel is moving on from the United States, at some point probably sooner rather than later, to India. So weakening the United States with a war on Iran is not all bad.”
2:38

Tucker Carlson suggests that Israel is looking for a New Global Superpower to leech onto because public support in the United States is slowly dying — they see the writing on the wall Tucker suggested two countries, China and India, ultimately narrowing it down to India. “It was probably no coincidence that the Prime Minister of India Modi spoke to the Kesset about the ‘ancient ties between Israel and India’.. bottom line, yes, Israel is moving on from the United States, at some point probably sooner rather than later, to India. So weakening the United States with a war on Iran is not all bad.”

MJTruthUltra

79,629 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi | On future of India-Russia ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "With all the pressure coming from the West, it is but of a challenging moment with all the pressure coming from the West and the fact that India has for now, reduced imports from Russia... One could look at the security aspects of the relationship where we've seen some delays in getting Russian military equipment to India... Energy and arms have been the key aspect of the relationship between the two... India has been trying to increase its access to Central Asia and Russia can be of help in this... China has its own influence in Central Asia. Pakistan has been trying to increase its own access to Central Asia. So with India working with Russia, its good friend, Russia could perhaps help advance India's goals in that region..."
2:51

#WATCH | Delhi | On future of India-Russia ties, South Asia analyst, Michael Kugelman says, "With all the pressure coming from the West, it is but of a challenging moment with all the pressure coming from the West and the fact that India has for now, reduced imports from Russia... One could look at the security aspects of the relationship where we've seen some delays in getting Russian military equipment to India... Energy and arms have been the key aspect of the relationship between the two... India has been trying to increase its access to Central Asia and Russia can be of help in this... China has its own influence in Central Asia. Pakistan has been trying to increase its own access to Central Asia. So with India working with Russia, its good friend, Russia could perhaps help advance India's goals in that region..."

ANI

37,014 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On US President Donald Trump's statement on 'G2', Former National Security Advisor of the United States, John Bolton, says, "It is a dangerous sidelining of India. China’s aspirations for hegemony along the Indo-Pacific periphery are one of the major issues which is why closer relations between India and the US are so critical...The part of the problem is that Trump’s focus is so heavily on trade; almost every time he speaks with foreign leaders, it is hard to get to anything else. But we can see what China’s approach has been in East Asia, across the Taiwan Strait and in the South China Sea. We know of the tensions along the Line of Actual Control with India. This problem is not going away; it is getting bigger. We either address it together, or we will have to address it separately, which is not ideal"
1:22

#WATCH | Washington, DC | On US President Donald Trump's statement on 'G2', Former National Security Advisor of the United States, John Bolton, says, "It is a dangerous sidelining of India. China’s aspirations for hegemony along the Indo-Pacific periphery are one of the major issues which is why closer relations between India and the US are so critical...The part of the problem is that Trump’s focus is so heavily on trade; almost every time he speaks with foreign leaders, it is hard to get to anything else. But we can see what China’s approach has been in East Asia, across the Taiwan Strait and in the South China Sea. We know of the tensions along the Line of Actual Control with India. This problem is not going away; it is getting bigger. We either address it together, or we will have to address it separately, which is not ideal"

ANI

27,633 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Professor Marta Fernandez: The US🇺🇸 is trying to impose a hegemony it has already LOST in Western Hemisphere 'Trump challenged BRICS with 100% tariffs if BRICS advances its agenda of de-dollarisation. But then he started to put tariffs in a bilateral way, even with India, 50% tariffs last year because India is buying oil from Russia. So I read these tariffs as sanctions that are politically motivated. And in the case of Brazil, there is this attempt of Trump to impose a hegemony that is a little bit lost in the Western Hemisphere.' -Professor Marta Fernandez, Former Director of the BRICS Policy Center, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇
0:56

Professor Marta Fernandez: The US🇺🇸 is trying to impose a hegemony it has already LOST in Western Hemisphere 'Trump challenged BRICS with 100% tariffs if BRICS advances its agenda of de-dollarisation. But then he started to put tariffs in a bilateral way, even with India, 50% tariffs last year because India is buying oil from Russia. So I read these tariffs as sanctions that are politically motivated. And in the case of Brazil, there is this attempt of Trump to impose a hegemony that is a little bit lost in the Western Hemisphere.' -Professor Marta Fernandez, Former Director of the BRICS Policy Center, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

32,321 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

.Matthew Boyle to Jack Poso 🇺🇸: "I think that the US will get to a deal with India, and when that happens, what President Trump then has is basically the entire free world in economic partnership with the United States in these trade deals, and broader peace agreements."
3:33

.Matthew Boyle to Jack Poso 🇺🇸: "I think that the US will get to a deal with India, and when that happens, what President Trump then has is basically the entire free world in economic partnership with the United States in these trade deals, and broader peace agreements."

Human Events

23,567 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce