Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

COMMON MAN’S RAGE BURSTS THROUGH A DATE-PE-DATE SYSTEM 🚨 PETITIONER: Judicial servant sir, I order you to direct an FIR against the ACP of Vikas Nagar, Lucknow. JUSTICE VISWANATHAN: Are you ordering me? Are you ordering us? PETITIONER: I am sovereign. OPINION 🙏: This anger does not appear from...

192,518 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Date: 10th July 2026, Time: 11am In the Court of Partial Working Day Bench of Justices KV Viswanathan and Alok Aradhe. Prabal Pratap from Lucknow in UP appeared as a petitioner-in-person and addressed Milords as "Judicial Servant" and ordered them to lodge an FIR against an Assistant Superintendent of Lucknow Police for running a syndicate in cybercrime. Milords were shocked but Prabal continued and threw some papers towards Judges and asked them to deliver these papers to CJI and addressed the CJI as MC. After that, Court security personnel escorted him out of the courtroom and he was detained in the DSP's office inside the courtroom for some time. The Bench dismissed his petition but decided not to initiate any contempt or any other coercive proceedings against the him. Lets see how CJI will react now because his fellow Judges did not take any action against someone who addressed him as MC that too inside the courtroom. PS: Prabal appeared as petitioner in person in the Supreme Court to challenge an Allahabad High Court order that dismissed his writ petition against a decision of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Customs), Lucknow. The magistrate had directed that his application be treated as a private complaint instead of ordering registration of an FIR. The Allahabad High Court held that the petitioner had an effective alternative remedy against the trial court's order and granted him liberty to approach the appropriate forum.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

171,996 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,760 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce