Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

📌Commonwealth v Lindsay Clancy I’ve been WAITING for Peter Tragos’ take on what happened today during the cross of Susan Clancy and he did not disappoint. That questioning was absolutely jaw-dropping. Asking Patrick’s mother, the grandmother of Cora, Dawson and Callan, about her Catholic faith and whether she knew... show more

Kelly💚🌴

3,480 subscribers

31,683 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

TRIAL UPDATE: Testimony continues in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, charged in the deaths of her three young children. Her defense argues she was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis and is not criminally responsible. During cross-examination of Clancy's former mother-in-law, a prosecutor asked if she was aware murder is a "mortal sin" in the Catholic Church; the judge immediately ordered the question stricken from the record. If convicted, Clancy faces life without parole; if found not guilty by reason of insanity, she will be committed to a state mental health facility.

TRIAL UPDATE: Testimony continues in the murder trial of Lindsay Clancy, charged in the deaths of her three young children. Her defense argues she was experiencing severe postpartum psychosis and is not criminally responsible. During cross-examination of Clancy's former mother-in-law, a prosecutor asked if she was aware murder is a "mortal sin" in the Catholic Church; the judge immediately ordered the question stricken from the record. If convicted, Clancy faces life without parole; if found not guilty by reason of insanity, she will be committed to a state mental health facility.

FOX & Friends

16,261 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I am absolutely APPALLED. The ADA actually asked Patrick Clancy’s mother whether she knew murder was a mortal sin. Judge Sullivan immediately jumped in, struck it from the record and called a sidebar. What was the purpose of that question other than to inflame the jury and inject religion and moral judgment into the testimony? There are three children at the center of this tragedy and an enormously serious case being tried. The courtroom deserves better than theatrics like this. That moment was completely inappropriate. The gull of these ADA are scum of earth

I am absolutely APPALLED. The ADA actually asked Patrick Clancy’s mother whether she knew murder was a mortal sin. Judge Sullivan immediately jumped in, struck it from the record and called a sidebar. What was the purpose of that question other than to inflame the jury and inject religion and moral judgment into the testimony? There are three children at the center of this tragedy and an enormously serious case being tried. The courtroom deserves better than theatrics like this. That moment was completely inappropriate. The gull of these ADA are scum of earth

Kelly💚🌴

106,904 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"Everything proved that she loved her children so she had to have snapped and not known what she was doing. To me it was proof that she didn't know what she was doing," the forewoman of the Lindsay Clancy jury.

"Everything proved that she loved her children so she had to have snapped and not known what she was doing. To me it was proof that she didn't know what she was doing," the forewoman of the Lindsay Clancy jury.

Libby Emmons

92,016 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

After the judge declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on Friday, Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz emphasized that the case was about getting justice for the child victims — Cora, Dawson and Callan. "It is our job to make sure that the victims are not invisible, to make sure that they're not forgotten," Cruz said. With the trial over, he must now decide if he will retry Clancy and, if so, what charges she will face.

After the judge declared a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial on Friday, Plymouth District Attorney Tim Cruz emphasized that the case was about getting justice for the child victims — Cora, Dawson and Callan. "It is our job to make sure that the victims are not invisible, to make sure that they're not forgotten," Cruz said. With the trial over, he must now decide if he will retry Clancy and, if so, what charges she will face.

CBS News

28,345 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney defended his aggressive cross-examination of prosecution witnesses as he left court Tuesday. Asked about criticism that he was hard on a witness, Kevin Reddington said: "The guy's saying bad things about Lindsay, none of which have a basis. So, yeah, I get a little angry." He also dismissed the prosecution experts' questioning of Clancy's memory of hearing voices as "ridiculous," saying no one could be expected to recall every detail from three years ago while in the state she was in. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney defended his aggressive cross-examination of prosecution witnesses as he left court Tuesday. Asked about criticism that he was hard on a witness, Kevin Reddington said: "The guy's saying bad things about Lindsay, none of which have a basis. So, yeah, I get a little angry." He also dismissed the prosecution experts' questioning of Clancy's memory of hearing voices as "ridiculous," saying no one could be expected to recall every detail from three years ago while in the state she was in. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

Fox True Crime

19,297 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

🚨NEW: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR SPEAKS OUT ON GMA THIS MORNING: Juror Nick Dargie, 25, spoke with ABC News’ Aaron Katersky about what happened inside the jury room before the Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. Dargie says the jury ultimately stood 11–1 in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, with one juror holding out for conviction. He told ABC that he repeatedly asked the holdout juror to identify evidence or witness testimony supporting his position and said the juror could not do so. Dargie said: “There wasn’t a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was.” The five-week trial ended in a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy remains charged in the 2023 deaths of her children Cora, Dawson and Callan Clancy. The parties are scheduled to return to court September 29 as the case moves forward.

🚨NEW: LINDSAY CLANCY JUROR SPEAKS OUT ON GMA THIS MORNING: Juror Nick Dargie, 25, spoke with ABC News’ Aaron Katersky about what happened inside the jury room before the Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial. Dargie says the jury ultimately stood 11–1 in favor of finding Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity, with one juror holding out for conviction. He told ABC that he repeatedly asked the holdout juror to identify evidence or witness testimony supporting his position and said the juror could not do so. Dargie said: “There wasn’t a single piece of evidence or witness testimony that he used to prove why he was thinking the way he was.” The five-week trial ended in a mistrial on September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Lindsay Clancy remains charged in the 2023 deaths of her children Cora, Dawson and Callan Clancy. The parties are scheduled to return to court September 29 as the case moves forward.

Lindsay 🇺🇸

1,096,572 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Lindsay Clancy and attorney Kevin Reddington stipulation to facts in the trial. This stipulation (admission of guilt) was made so that the commonwealth would not need to bring in dozens of additional witnesses to prove that Clancy murdered her children and the blood and dna evidence directly linking her. Likely to save time and to prevent Clancy from further emotional outbursts in the courtroom. The only question has ever been; Should she be criminally responsible for the murders? Was she in a state of mind where she knew right from wrong? Somehow people continue wanting to believe she never admitted guilt. She did. Somehow people continue stating that the commonwealth failed to prove that she did. They didn’t have to because of the stipulation of facts.

Lindsay Clancy and attorney Kevin Reddington stipulation to facts in the trial. This stipulation (admission of guilt) was made so that the commonwealth would not need to bring in dozens of additional witnesses to prove that Clancy murdered her children and the blood and dna evidence directly linking her. Likely to save time and to prevent Clancy from further emotional outbursts in the courtroom. The only question has ever been; Should she be criminally responsible for the murders? Was she in a state of mind where she knew right from wrong? Somehow people continue wanting to believe she never admitted guilt. She did. Somehow people continue stating that the commonwealth failed to prove that she did. They didn’t have to because of the stipulation of facts.

John Curtis

25,264 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

The most important thing to understand before closing arguments today is what Massachusetts law actually requires, because the legal posture of this case has been wildly misrepresented. The Commonwealth must FIRST prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay Clancy committed the alleged acts. Only then does criminal responsibility become the question. There is NO stipulation before this jury that Lindsay killed her children. Her plea is NOT GUILTY. Reddington has not conceded that she killed them either. You’ve probably seen his opening statement quoted as, “she knows that she killed these children.” Except that’s not what he said. His actual statement was, “And they would bring their evidence in front of a jury that she knows that she killed these children. We’ll sit here, listen to the evidence, but I suggest to you that the issue of consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.” He was describing what the COMMONWEALTH would attempt to prove. Cutting off the beginning completely changes the meaning. The civil filings don’t change this either. They are not evidence in this criminal trial and are not before this jury. Reddington twice sought to bifurcate the trial so whether Lindsay committed the acts and whether she was criminally responsible could be considered separately. The judge denied those requests. He also requested a Bowden instruction regarding deficiencies in the police investigation. The judge declined to give the specific instruction, but Reddington can still argue that those investigative failures create reasonable doubt during closing. This case has become a complete cluster of selectively edited quotes, legal misunderstandings, assumptions repeated as facts, and emotion substituted for evidence. Strip all of that away and the jury’s job is straightforward: What does the evidence actually prove? Has the Commonwealth proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay committed these crimes? And ONLY if it has, was she criminally responsible? Your feelings about Lindsay do not change the burden of proof. Cora, Dawson and Callan deserved a thorough investigation and a case proven with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Whatever this verdict is, I pray those three precious children ultimately receive the complete truth and justice they deserve.

The most important thing to understand before closing arguments today is what Massachusetts law actually requires, because the legal posture of this case has been wildly misrepresented. The Commonwealth must FIRST prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay Clancy committed the alleged acts. Only then does criminal responsibility become the question. There is NO stipulation before this jury that Lindsay killed her children. Her plea is NOT GUILTY. Reddington has not conceded that she killed them either. You’ve probably seen his opening statement quoted as, “she knows that she killed these children.” Except that’s not what he said. His actual statement was, “And they would bring their evidence in front of a jury that she knows that she killed these children. We’ll sit here, listen to the evidence, but I suggest to you that the issue of consideration is what was going on in that woman’s mind.” He was describing what the COMMONWEALTH would attempt to prove. Cutting off the beginning completely changes the meaning. The civil filings don’t change this either. They are not evidence in this criminal trial and are not before this jury. Reddington twice sought to bifurcate the trial so whether Lindsay committed the acts and whether she was criminally responsible could be considered separately. The judge denied those requests. He also requested a Bowden instruction regarding deficiencies in the police investigation. The judge declined to give the specific instruction, but Reddington can still argue that those investigative failures create reasonable doubt during closing. This case has become a complete cluster of selectively edited quotes, legal misunderstandings, assumptions repeated as facts, and emotion substituted for evidence. Strip all of that away and the jury’s job is straightforward: What does the evidence actually prove? Has the Commonwealth proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Lindsay committed these crimes? And ONLY if it has, was she criminally responsible? Your feelings about Lindsay do not change the burden of proof. Cora, Dawson and Callan deserved a thorough investigation and a case proven with evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Whatever this verdict is, I pray those three precious children ultimately receive the complete truth and justice they deserve.

Kylie Jane Kremer

27,771 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

10:15amET: The woman arrested outside the Lindsay Clancy murder trial was accused of filming jurors in the courthouse parking lot, prosecutors said at her arraignment in Massachusetts on Wednesday. Prosecutor Nicole Pearson, on behalf of the Commonwealth, said Dawn Light, 56, was sitting in her car filming potential jurors. According to Pearson, when Light was asked by police to open the deleted images folder on her phone, it contained a video of a number of people leaving the courthouse who were Clancy jurors. "She is filming jurors that are coming out of the building," Pearson said. Light was "adamant" she was not filming jurors, saying she was trying to see whether Clancy would come out, according to her attorney. Light's attorney called the incident "a complete misunderstanding," saying she was only trying to get a picture of Clancy. The attorney said Light is a retired registered nurse who worked in the profession for more than 25 years and has no criminal record. The judge released Light without cash bail and ordered her to stay away from courthouse grounds, to have no contact with jurors or witnesses, and to refrain from sharing photos or videos related to the incident. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

10:15amET: The woman arrested outside the Lindsay Clancy murder trial was accused of filming jurors in the courthouse parking lot, prosecutors said at her arraignment in Massachusetts on Wednesday. Prosecutor Nicole Pearson, on behalf of the Commonwealth, said Dawn Light, 56, was sitting in her car filming potential jurors. According to Pearson, when Light was asked by police to open the deleted images folder on her phone, it contained a video of a number of people leaving the courthouse who were Clancy jurors. "She is filming jurors that are coming out of the building," Pearson said. Light was "adamant" she was not filming jurors, saying she was trying to see whether Clancy would come out, according to her attorney. Light's attorney called the incident "a complete misunderstanding," saying she was only trying to get a picture of Clancy. The attorney said Light is a retired registered nurse who worked in the profession for more than 25 years and has no criminal record. The judge released Light without cash bail and ordered her to stay away from courthouse grounds, to have no contact with jurors or witnesses, and to refrain from sharing photos or videos related to the incident. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

Fox True Crime

22,066 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

🚨 TWO DAYS. THREE DEAD KIDS. NO VERDICT. The Lindsay Clancy jury has been sent home for the weekend. Cora was 5. Dawson was 3. Callan was 8 months old. She strangled all three of them with exercise bands in the basement. Then jumped out a window. The defense wants the jury to believe postpartum psychosis means she wasn’t responsible. The hangup isn’t the facts. The hangup is whether “mental health” now cancels murder. Three children are gone. Their mother did it. Justice delayed is justice denied and those kids already paid the price.

🚨 TWO DAYS. THREE DEAD KIDS. NO VERDICT. The Lindsay Clancy jury has been sent home for the weekend. Cora was 5. Dawson was 3. Callan was 8 months old. She strangled all three of them with exercise bands in the basement. Then jumped out a window. The defense wants the jury to believe postpartum psychosis means she wasn’t responsible. The hangup isn’t the facts. The hangup is whether “mental health” now cancels murder. Three children are gone. Their mother did it. Justice delayed is justice denied and those kids already paid the price.

Gunther Eagleman™

43,190 görüntüleme • 21 gün önce

📌 COMMONWEALTH v LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL After the jury was dismissed today, the Commonwealth raised an issue about who has been signing in and out of the courthouse lockup to visit Lindsay, how often those visits are happening, and when they occurred. One person they specifically focused on was defense psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel, who the Commonwealth believes has been visiting Lindsay frequently during the trial. Why does that matter? Because Dr. Zeizel may ultimately testify for the defense. The CW appears to be laying the groundwork to examine those visits and potentially question his ongoing contact with Lindsay, his role in the case, and his objectivity if he takes the stand. The Commonwealth also brought up a priest who has been visiting Lindsay. That immediately raised questions from Judge Sullivan about why the CW would need information about the priest. Kevin Reddington explained that the priest is Father Bob, someone close to Lindsay who baptized her children and has continued to visit her. And this is where Judge Sullivan drew a pretty clear line. He was not willing to simply turn over Father Bob’s visitation information because he has been visiting Lindsay. If the defense later decides to call Father Bob as a witness, the issue can be addressed at that point. Dr. Zeizel was treated differently. Judge Sullivan ruled that the Commonwealth can review the courthouse security records showing when and how often Dr. Zeizel has gone back into the lockup to see Lindsay during the trial. That distinction matters. This does NOT mean the Commonwealth gets access to what Lindsay and Dr. Zeizel discussed. It also does NOT mean anyone has established that Dr. Zeizel has done anything improper. Right now, they are getting information about the visits themselves. And I don’t think the timing is insignificant. Dr. Zeizel has already come up during testimony, including that strange theory about whether he told Lindsay to call Patrick and say she was hearing voices, a theory that the trooper ultimately acknowledged was speculation and apparently wasn’t actually investigated. Now the Commonwealth wants records documenting Dr. Zeizel’s contact with Lindsay while the trial itself is happening. To me, this looks like the CW is preparing for Dr. Zeizel before he ever takes the witness stand. And depending on what happens when the defense begins presenting its case, I have a feeling we haven’t heard the last of this issue.

📌 COMMONWEALTH v LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL After the jury was dismissed today, the Commonwealth raised an issue about who has been signing in and out of the courthouse lockup to visit Lindsay, how often those visits are happening, and when they occurred. One person they specifically focused on was defense psychologist Dr. Paul Zeizel, who the Commonwealth believes has been visiting Lindsay frequently during the trial. Why does that matter? Because Dr. Zeizel may ultimately testify for the defense. The CW appears to be laying the groundwork to examine those visits and potentially question his ongoing contact with Lindsay, his role in the case, and his objectivity if he takes the stand. The Commonwealth also brought up a priest who has been visiting Lindsay. That immediately raised questions from Judge Sullivan about why the CW would need information about the priest. Kevin Reddington explained that the priest is Father Bob, someone close to Lindsay who baptized her children and has continued to visit her. And this is where Judge Sullivan drew a pretty clear line. He was not willing to simply turn over Father Bob’s visitation information because he has been visiting Lindsay. If the defense later decides to call Father Bob as a witness, the issue can be addressed at that point. Dr. Zeizel was treated differently. Judge Sullivan ruled that the Commonwealth can review the courthouse security records showing when and how often Dr. Zeizel has gone back into the lockup to see Lindsay during the trial. That distinction matters. This does NOT mean the Commonwealth gets access to what Lindsay and Dr. Zeizel discussed. It also does NOT mean anyone has established that Dr. Zeizel has done anything improper. Right now, they are getting information about the visits themselves. And I don’t think the timing is insignificant. Dr. Zeizel has already come up during testimony, including that strange theory about whether he told Lindsay to call Patrick and say she was hearing voices, a theory that the trooper ultimately acknowledged was speculation and apparently wasn’t actually investigated. Now the Commonwealth wants records documenting Dr. Zeizel’s contact with Lindsay while the trial itself is happening. To me, this looks like the CW is preparing for Dr. Zeizel before he ever takes the witness stand. And depending on what happens when the defense begins presenting its case, I have a feeling we haven’t heard the last of this issue.

Kelly💚🌴

21,419 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

💜 LINDSAY CLANCY BEFORE SHE BECAME A MOM Fresh out of nursing school, before Lindsay Clancy ever had babies of her own, she dedicated herself to helping other mothers bring their babies into the world. She became a Labor & Delivery nurse caring for women during some of the most vulnerable, emotional and important moments of their lives. Her friends and coworkers loved her. She was described as caring, compassionate and someone people trusted. Then Lindsay became a mother herself. That is part of what makes this case so heartbreaking. A woman who spent her career caring for mothers and babies would later struggle profoundly with her own postpartum mental health. You can acknowledge the unimaginable loss of Cora, Dawson and Callan while also asking what happened to their mother. Lindsay wasn't always the woman sitting in that courtroom. She was a daughter. A friend. A nurse. A wife. A mother. And before everything changed, she spent her days caring for moms and their newborn babies. 💜 Mental illness can change a person in devastating ways. Understanding that doesn't diminish the lives of Cora, Dawson and Callan, their lives will always matter. 💜 Cora 💜 Dawson 💜 Callan #LindsayClancy #MaternalMentalHealth #PostpartumMentalHealth #PPD #PPA #PPP

💜 LINDSAY CLANCY BEFORE SHE BECAME A MOM Fresh out of nursing school, before Lindsay Clancy ever had babies of her own, she dedicated herself to helping other mothers bring their babies into the world. She became a Labor & Delivery nurse caring for women during some of the most vulnerable, emotional and important moments of their lives. Her friends and coworkers loved her. She was described as caring, compassionate and someone people trusted. Then Lindsay became a mother herself. That is part of what makes this case so heartbreaking. A woman who spent her career caring for mothers and babies would later struggle profoundly with her own postpartum mental health. You can acknowledge the unimaginable loss of Cora, Dawson and Callan while also asking what happened to their mother. Lindsay wasn't always the woman sitting in that courtroom. She was a daughter. A friend. A nurse. A wife. A mother. And before everything changed, she spent her days caring for moms and their newborn babies. 💜 Mental illness can change a person in devastating ways. Understanding that doesn't diminish the lives of Cora, Dawson and Callan, their lives will always matter. 💜 Cora 💜 Dawson 💜 Callan #LindsayClancy #MaternalMentalHealth #PostpartumMentalHealth #PPD #PPA #PPP

Kelly💚🌴

22,892 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A nanny who took care of Lindsay Clancy's children said during her trial on Wednesday that she was "a wonderful mom who loved her kids." Elaine Rossi, the Clancy family's former nanny, testified that Clancy was concerned about her children's safety and Rossi said she loved her. Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. She's admitted to killing them in the basement of their home on Jan. 24, 2023.

A nanny who took care of Lindsay Clancy's children said during her trial on Wednesday that she was "a wonderful mom who loved her kids." Elaine Rossi, the Clancy family's former nanny, testified that Clancy was concerned about her children's safety and Rossi said she loved her. Clancy is charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of her three children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. She's admitted to killing them in the basement of their home on Jan. 24, 2023.

CBS News

71,559 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HORRIFIC: An Illinois mother, Corie Walsh, hanged her 2-year-old son in the basement before trying to kill herself in what appears to be a Lindsay Clancy copycat. She told police she did it because the little boy was the “devil” and the “anti-Christ.” Prosecutors say she had become “very invested” in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial and was still texting friends about it hours before her son was found. Her husband was out of state on business when it happened Tuesday afternoon. Death penalty!

HORRIFIC: An Illinois mother, Corie Walsh, hanged her 2-year-old son in the basement before trying to kill herself in what appears to be a Lindsay Clancy copycat. She told police she did it because the little boy was the “devil” and the “anti-Christ.” Prosecutors say she had become “very invested” in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial and was still texting friends about it hours before her son was found. Her husband was out of state on business when it happened Tuesday afternoon. Death penalty!

RedWave Press

42,256 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

BREAKING: Judge declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy trial right before giving a brief history lesson on WWII. The jury of 9 women and 3 men could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether she was guilty of premeditated murder or whether she suffered from psychosis. It is speculated that 1 man held out and refused to change his mind that she was guilty of murder.

BREAKING: Judge declares a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy trial right before giving a brief history lesson on WWII. The jury of 9 women and 3 men could not reach a unanimous verdict on whether she was guilty of premeditated murder or whether she suffered from psychosis. It is speculated that 1 man held out and refused to change his mind that she was guilty of murder.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

113,440 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

Some of the most heartbreaking testimony during the first day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was when her former husband, Patrick Clancy, was asked to talk about their three children: Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months). We saw video of the family celebrating at a birthday party and were shown photos of each of the children. Patrick spoke about the morning and afternoon before the kids were killed - that Lindsay took Cora to the doctor, then they built a snowman and everyone was having a really good day. As Patrick testified, Lindsay looked down at the ground and the two made very little eye contact. He has since remarried and is living in New York. Patrick will be back on the stand Wednesday morning as the trial continues. Lindsay Clancy has not denied killing the kids, but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and should not be held criminally responsible

Some of the most heartbreaking testimony during the first day of Lindsay Clancy's murder trial was when her former husband, Patrick Clancy, was asked to talk about their three children: Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months). We saw video of the family celebrating at a birthday party and were shown photos of each of the children. Patrick spoke about the morning and afternoon before the kids were killed - that Lindsay took Cora to the doctor, then they built a snowman and everyone was having a really good day. As Patrick testified, Lindsay looked down at the ground and the two made very little eye contact. He has since remarried and is living in New York. Patrick will be back on the stand Wednesday morning as the trial continues. Lindsay Clancy has not denied killing the kids, but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and should not be held criminally responsible

Nate Eaton

278,509 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

An FBI psychiatrist testified Wednesday that financial pressure was among the stressors weighing on Lindsay Clancy before she killed her three children. Dr. Gregory Saathoff said Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, had repeatedly delayed her return to work because she did not feel mentally healthy enough, and that she listed finances as a stressor in her own records. Believing "her brain had been damaged" and that she could no longer do the work she loved or help support her family, Saathoff said, left her with a sense of being a burden. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

An FBI psychiatrist testified Wednesday that financial pressure was among the stressors weighing on Lindsay Clancy before she killed her three children. Dr. Gregory Saathoff said Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, had repeatedly delayed her return to work because she did not feel mentally healthy enough, and that she listed finances as a stressor in her own records. Believing "her brain had been damaged" and that she could no longer do the work she loved or help support her family, Saathoff said, left her with a sense of being a burden. Clancy faces three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of her children, Cora, Dawson and Callan. She does not dispute killing them but says she was suffering from postpartum psychosis.

Fox True Crime

60,821 görüntüleme • 23 gün önce

WHY HAS THE LINDSAY CLANCY JURY TAKEN SO LONG? Criminal defense attorney Josh Ritter explains why this isn't simply a question of whether Clancy killed her children — but what was going through her mind when she did. @KayleighMcEnany Fox News

WHY HAS THE LINDSAY CLANCY JURY TAKEN SO LONG? Criminal defense attorney Josh Ritter explains why this isn't simply a question of whether Clancy killed her children — but what was going through her mind when she did. @KayleighMcEnany Fox News

Saturday in America

12,436 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

"He'd been told what was going to happen." Benjamin Netanyahu had been warned that Hamas was planning an attack before October 7, Hillary Clinton said, describing it as a failure of leadership and a failure to protect the people of Israel. Clinton referred to the warning from UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed and said Netanyahu “had been told what was going to happen.” She then implied that Netanyahu may have wanted the attack to happen so that he could “come down hard” and enhance his position politically. “I don’t know what his thinking was,” Clinton said. “But the bottom line, talk about a failure of imagination. This was a failure of leadership. This was a failure of protecting the people of Israel.” Her remarks put Netanyahu’s handling of the intelligence under scrutiny, raising questions over what he knew before October 7 and why Israel chose to let the attack happen.

"He'd been told what was going to happen." Benjamin Netanyahu had been warned that Hamas was planning an attack before October 7, Hillary Clinton said, describing it as a failure of leadership and a failure to protect the people of Israel. Clinton referred to the warning from UAE President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed and said Netanyahu “had been told what was going to happen.” She then implied that Netanyahu may have wanted the attack to happen so that he could “come down hard” and enhance his position politically. “I don’t know what his thinking was,” Clinton said. “But the bottom line, talk about a failure of imagination. This was a failure of leadership. This was a failure of protecting the people of Israel.” Her remarks put Netanyahu’s handling of the intelligence under scrutiny, raising questions over what he knew before October 7 and why Israel chose to let the attack happen.

Middle East Eye

14,902 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

The judge in Lindsay Clancy's trial today specially instructed jurors not to consider religion after a prosecutor asked Clancy's former mother in law if she knows the Catholic Church considers murder a "mortal sin." Susan Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, testified as a defense witness. Assistant District Attorney Shanan L. Buckingham cross-examined her about Lindsay's condition in the months before she killed her three children on Jan. 23, 2024. She asked Susan near the end of the exam, "Are you an active member in the Catholic Church?" and Susan answered, "Yes." "So you're aware that murder is considered a mortal sin?" Buckingham asked. Judge William Sullivan interjected: "Counsel, can I see you over here?" The side bar lasted about 65 seconds. The courtroom camera didn't record the beginning of Judge Sullivan's instruction, but there's no way he didn't tell the jury anything other than not to consider the witness' religion when deciding the case. "And what that means is you are not to consider it for any reason or any purpose. Okay?" said Sullivan, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court in Massachusetts. Buckingham is the lead prosecutor in the case against Clancy, who is charged with three counts of murder. Clancy's defense is that she's not guilty because she was experiencing postpartum psychosis and didn't understand her actions so can't be held criminally responsible. Buckingham has been a licensed lawyer in Massachusetts since November 2011. She earned her law degree from Northeastern University School of Law.

The judge in Lindsay Clancy's trial today specially instructed jurors not to consider religion after a prosecutor asked Clancy's former mother in law if she knows the Catholic Church considers murder a "mortal sin." Susan Clancy, a labor and delivery nurse, testified as a defense witness. Assistant District Attorney Shanan L. Buckingham cross-examined her about Lindsay's condition in the months before she killed her three children on Jan. 23, 2024. She asked Susan near the end of the exam, "Are you an active member in the Catholic Church?" and Susan answered, "Yes." "So you're aware that murder is considered a mortal sin?" Buckingham asked. Judge William Sullivan interjected: "Counsel, can I see you over here?" The side bar lasted about 65 seconds. The courtroom camera didn't record the beginning of Judge Sullivan's instruction, but there's no way he didn't tell the jury anything other than not to consider the witness' religion when deciding the case. "And what that means is you are not to consider it for any reason or any purpose. Okay?" said Sullivan, who presides in Plymouth County Superior Court in Massachusetts. Buckingham is the lead prosecutor in the case against Clancy, who is charged with three counts of murder. Clancy's defense is that she's not guilty because she was experiencing postpartum psychosis and didn't understand her actions so can't be held criminally responsible. Buckingham has been a licensed lawyer in Massachusetts since November 2011. She earned her law degree from Northeastern University School of Law.

Meghann Cuniff

44,114 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce