Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

"Community is a bitch" – 9GAGCEO I think Ray got it wrong with his approach to community and how loyalty is earned. → True loyalty comes from emotional connection, not transactional incentives. And love, by nature, is irrational, that’s what makes it powerful. Love is what makes people stick,... even through the bear markets and the fud cycles. And love isn’t built on staking rewards or token drips. What he expects in terms of loyalty and trust simply doesn’t match what he’s giving. Memeland actually started with those roots. It had respect. It had personality. It had innovation and the foundation of a playful brand built around Potatoz and Captainz. But over time, it drifted away from that identity and pushed away those supporters. Instead, it leaned fully into transactional promises. MEME paid well (if you sold). But that only works as long as you keep paying. The moment rewards dry up, everything collapses into frustration and rage quits. So what’s left now?show more

LoKi 😈

48,522 subscribers

18,621 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Finance Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Loki 😈1 year ago

more context

Loki 😈1 year ago

more context

Kien Nguyen1 year ago

@9gagceo Community is not a bitch, Ray is

karga1 year ago

Lets look at a different angle: All these founders are the b*tch. Before the nft mint launch, before the token launch, they are gone. The moment that they get the fees, investments in their wallets, they are gone. If the token price is down, they call you jeeters, fudders. Founders are b*tch. At the end of the day, you love that b*tch. Because without that b*tch, there is nothing you can build. Bc at the end of the, its all about founders.

Loki 😈1 year ago

@9gagceo a bit generic but i get u! i think ray was awesome until they've started neglecting and gaslighting the community. it's been wayyyy too long now and they raised a lot of money, it's no joke

Mondoggg1 year ago

@9gagceo Wondering the same about what's next. Can they turn the ship around or will many of us be caught holding massive bags

Loki 😈1 year ago

@9gagceo You’re not down that bad, you’ll be fine 😁

A𝕏L ❤️ Memecoin1 year ago

@9gagceo I think we are dramatizing to much what he said. IMO Rays intention was to make it funny and because of the sentiment around ML right now is so negative, the perception was different. At the end of the day he is kind of right, 99% of holders just care about FP. Not easy!

Nezuron1 year ago

@9gagceo I think memeland lost their way the moment they pivot into "0 speculation, 0 hype". ever since everything just came out slow af, or never at all.

Loki 😈1 year ago

@9gagceo Mmmm

Related Videos

Bill O’Reilly and Chris Cuomo just got into a HEATED sparring match over where the “weapons of mass destruction” narrative in Iraq actually came from. O’Reilly said it started with the New York Times — Cuomo bet him $100K that it did not. O’REILLY: “I was wrong about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. And the reason I was wrong was because Saddam Hussein told his own generals he had them.” “And then those generals leaked it to the New York Times and put it on page one. And I bought it!” CUOMO: “Well, that’s not what happened. That’s not what happened.” “The Bush administration lied about there being yellow cake uranium and there being weapons of mass destruction and that’s how it started.” “I didn’t come through the New York Times, it came through the Bush administration.” O’REILLY: “If you go back, and this is easy for you to do, it was page ONE of the New York Times...” “Don’t say it isn’t true! Because every word I said is TRUE.” CUOMO: [Laughs] “Well...you think every word you say is true and that’s okay.” O’REILLY: “No! I can prove it!” “Cuomo, you want to put 10 grand on it now? I’ll prove it.” CUOMO: “Yes. I’ll tell you what, I’ll put $100,000 on this proposition, that the idea that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction did not start with the New York Times.” “It started with the Bush administration and that’s why Colin Powell wound up losing his career, when he very well could have been a superior president of the United States because they made it up, they ruined intelligence careers and they lied.”

Bill O’Reilly and Chris Cuomo just got into a HEATED sparring match over where the “weapons of mass destruction” narrative in Iraq actually came from. O’Reilly said it started with the New York Times — Cuomo bet him $100K that it did not. O’REILLY: “I was wrong about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. And the reason I was wrong was because Saddam Hussein told his own generals he had them.” “And then those generals leaked it to the New York Times and put it on page one. And I bought it!” CUOMO: “Well, that’s not what happened. That’s not what happened.” “The Bush administration lied about there being yellow cake uranium and there being weapons of mass destruction and that’s how it started.” “I didn’t come through the New York Times, it came through the Bush administration.” O’REILLY: “If you go back, and this is easy for you to do, it was page ONE of the New York Times...” “Don’t say it isn’t true! Because every word I said is TRUE.” CUOMO: [Laughs] “Well...you think every word you say is true and that’s okay.” O’REILLY: “No! I can prove it!” “Cuomo, you want to put 10 grand on it now? I’ll prove it.” CUOMO: “Yes. I’ll tell you what, I’ll put $100,000 on this proposition, that the idea that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction did not start with the New York Times.” “It started with the Bush administration and that’s why Colin Powell wound up losing his career, when he very well could have been a superior president of the United States because they made it up, they ruined intelligence careers and they lied.”

Overton

394,018 views • 2 months ago

Let me explain the sinister nature of what Trump actually does to people. He asks: are you loyal to me? Yes. Good. No forever wars. Are you with me? Yes. No forever wars. Then he starts the wars. And now he needs you to be with him on the wars too. And then the Epstein files come out. Allegations involving children. And he needs you to look the other way on that too. That’s the mechanism. That’s how it works. He moves the goalposts incrementally. Each ask is slightly more compromising than the last. And by the time you realize how far you’ve traveled from your own principles you are so deep in that you can’t find your way back. Loyalty to Trump doesn’t mean loyalty to an idea or a policy or a vision for the country. It means asymmetric, unconditional, no-questions-asked loyalty to whatever he decides is true today. You have to understand the sinister nature of that to understand what is really happening in Washington right now. This isn’t politics. This is a loyalty trap.

Let me explain the sinister nature of what Trump actually does to people. He asks: are you loyal to me? Yes. Good. No forever wars. Are you with me? Yes. No forever wars. Then he starts the wars. And now he needs you to be with him on the wars too. And then the Epstein files come out. Allegations involving children. And he needs you to look the other way on that too. That’s the mechanism. That’s how it works. He moves the goalposts incrementally. Each ask is slightly more compromising than the last. And by the time you realize how far you’ve traveled from your own principles you are so deep in that you can’t find your way back. Loyalty to Trump doesn’t mean loyalty to an idea or a policy or a vision for the country. It means asymmetric, unconditional, no-questions-asked loyalty to whatever he decides is true today. You have to understand the sinister nature of that to understand what is really happening in Washington right now. This isn’t politics. This is a loyalty trap.

Anthony Scaramucci

350,931 views • 4 months ago

“As a country, we know ourselves as we are. What other lessons, then, would you still need, beyond what you have seen, what you have gone through, and the consequences of those experiences? To our young people, many of whom are here today, I ask you this: wherever you go in the world, whatever you see, whatever you admire, never think of trying to leap away from who you are and becoming something else you saw elsewhere. It does not last. And even if it did last, it would be like living without truly existing. This is rooted in what we believe, and this applies even in matters of religious faith, but it is also rooted in culture. When your culture is replaced by trying to copy what you saw elsewhere, it is destructive and it does not endure. We must therefore guard against that, and instead look for ways to develop what is ours, where it is not good, we change it and make it better, but always building on the foundation of who we are.” President Kagame | National Prayer Breakfast.

“As a country, we know ourselves as we are. What other lessons, then, would you still need, beyond what you have seen, what you have gone through, and the consequences of those experiences? To our young people, many of whom are here today, I ask you this: wherever you go in the world, whatever you see, whatever you admire, never think of trying to leap away from who you are and becoming something else you saw elsewhere. It does not last. And even if it did last, it would be like living without truly existing. This is rooted in what we believe, and this applies even in matters of religious faith, but it is also rooted in culture. When your culture is replaced by trying to copy what you saw elsewhere, it is destructive and it does not endure. We must therefore guard against that, and instead look for ways to develop what is ours, where it is not good, we change it and make it better, but always building on the foundation of who we are.” President Kagame | National Prayer Breakfast.

Presidency | Rwanda

24,248 views • 6 months ago

What Jealousy Is Really Telling You That tight, hot rush of jealousy — most of us just want it to go away fast. But what if it’s actually trying to tell you something useful? When you pause and get curious instead of fighting it, the feeling can turn into deeper connection and self-awareness. This is a calm, honest conversation about why jealousy isn’t the enemy and how to work with it in any relationship.

What Jealousy Is Really Telling You That tight, hot rush of jealousy — most of us just want it to go away fast. But what if it’s actually trying to tell you something useful? When you pause and get curious instead of fighting it, the feeling can turn into deeper connection and self-awareness. This is a calm, honest conversation about why jealousy isn’t the enemy and how to work with it in any relationship.

Kate Shelor

33,310 views • 2 months ago

Baptised Catholics who walk away from the true Church often claim they have “seen the light.” But let’s be clear, that is not the light. No failure of a priest. No scandal of a bishop. Not even the weakness of a Pope is ever a justification to abandon the Catholic Church. The truth is this: you don’t leave Christ because of Judas. The Catholic Church is not built on the perfection of men. it is built on Christ Himself and sustained by the Eucharist. Those who truly understand and value the Eucharist do not walk away from it. Call it what it is, not “seeing the light,” but turning away from it. Leaving the Catholic Church is synonymous with turning away from the Light.

Baptised Catholics who walk away from the true Church often claim they have “seen the light.” But let’s be clear, that is not the light. No failure of a priest. No scandal of a bishop. Not even the weakness of a Pope is ever a justification to abandon the Catholic Church. The truth is this: you don’t leave Christ because of Judas. The Catholic Church is not built on the perfection of men. it is built on Christ Himself and sustained by the Eucharist. Those who truly understand and value the Eucharist do not walk away from it. Call it what it is, not “seeing the light,” but turning away from it. Leaving the Catholic Church is synonymous with turning away from the Light.

Uche is a girl 🇻🇦

111,179 views • 3 months ago

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 views • 1 month ago

People really need to experience a genuine, loving relationship before deciding what intimacy is supposed to look like. A lot of people watch movies and series and immediately equate intimacy with sex to touching, kissing, taking clothes off, and jumping straight into the physical. The focus becomes pleasure instead of love, trust, vulnerability, and devotion. But intimacy and sex are not the same thing. I’ve seen people criticize ppw kisses as being “too stiff” or “too hesitant,” but to me, that’s exactly what made them believable. Not every couple kisses with overwhelming confidence or passion right away. Sometimes love is gentle. Sometimes it’s careful, shy, and full of emotion. Real intimacy doesn’t have to be perfectly choreographed or intensely sexual. P’x have been doing exactly that with ppw in MAT and PAM. He has been showing Love with ppw, that's why most of the kisses occur after a touching dialogue. When you’re with someone you truly love, and they love you just as deeply, making love feels completely different from simply having sex. The physical aspect is only one part of it. What makes it meaningful is the emotional connection behind every touch, every kiss, every pause, every look. Bc that's what intimacy actually is.

Sensitive content

People really need to experience a genuine, loving relationship before deciding what intimacy is supposed to look like. A lot of people watch movies and series and immediately equate intimacy with sex to touching, kissing, taking clothes off, and jumping straight into the physical. The focus becomes pleasure instead of love, trust, vulnerability, and devotion. But intimacy and sex are not the same thing. I’ve seen people criticize ppw kisses as being “too stiff” or “too hesitant,” but to me, that’s exactly what made them believable. Not every couple kisses with overwhelming confidence or passion right away. Sometimes love is gentle. Sometimes it’s careful, shy, and full of emotion. Real intimacy doesn’t have to be perfectly choreographed or intensely sexual. P’x have been doing exactly that with ppw in MAT and PAM. He has been showing Love with ppw, that's why most of the kisses occur after a touching dialogue. When you’re with someone you truly love, and they love you just as deeply, making love feels completely different from simply having sex. The physical aspect is only one part of it. What makes it meaningful is the emotional connection behind every touch, every kiss, every pause, every look. Bc that's what intimacy actually is.

Tiny เทนี่ 🌱 || PHUWIN LERTRATKOSUM era

100,994 views • 4 days ago

“I think it helped that Rob and I were both in similar places in our lives — I mean, not the dark version, but you know… He had a brand-new baby, and I had a baby. I think we’re both really lucky with our partners [Suki Waterhouse and Cooke Maroney]. We’re able to explore kind of what it should be — and what it is!”

Robert Pattinson Photos | Fansite

126,947 views • 9 months ago

Drake Maye was asked if his trust in Stefon Diggs was built up over time, or if he had it with him right away: “No, that trust was built up probably when I was in middle school when he was playing in the league, it was long ago. You know, guys like him and Hunter and Mack - you trust those guys for what they’ve done in this league…” WEEI #NEPats

Drake Maye was asked if his trust in Stefon Diggs was built up over time, or if he had it with him right away: “No, that trust was built up probably when I was in middle school when he was playing in the league, it was long ago. You know, guys like him and Hunter and Mack - you trust those guys for what they’ve done in this league…” WEEI #NEPats

Tom Carroll

2,041,881 views • 8 months ago

Martha Karua: Wetangula knows that what he did was wrong and dishonest. Kenyans must ask themselves, Azimio had a majority of parliamentarians and governors, is it possible that KK even won the presidency? The answer is no, they got it the way they know, which is crooked. I believe that and I know that Azimio won those elections but never got the seat, KK got it. I do not believe in the ruling of the Supreme Court, we respected it but that doesn’t mean we agree with it #JKLive Jeff Koinange, MBS

Martha Karua: Wetangula knows that what he did was wrong and dishonest. Kenyans must ask themselves, Azimio had a majority of parliamentarians and governors, is it possible that KK even won the presidency? The answer is no, they got it the way they know, which is crooked. I believe that and I know that Azimio won those elections but never got the seat, KK got it. I do not believe in the ruling of the Supreme Court, we respected it but that doesn’t mean we agree with it #JKLive Jeff Koinange, MBS

Citizen TV Kenya

44,754 views • 1 year ago

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Bagram, what goes into retaking Bagram? Does that require boots on the ground?” President Donald Trump: “We’ll see what happens with Bagram. We’re talking to Afghanistan. It should have never been given up. It was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country. There was no reason to give it up. I was leaving Afghanistan. I was leaving, I was the one that got it down to 5,000 soldiers. But we were going to we were going to keep Bagram, the air base. I said it yesterday and we had an incredible trip, as you know, to U.K., and I said it during the press conference. It’s one of the most powerful runways ever built in terms of weight, length and load, what it can — what it could take, and we just gave it up for nothing. We gave it up for nothing. There was no reason to give it up. We weren’t going to leave Bagram. Joe Biden didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man that didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man, by the way, that didn’t approve — if you take a look at what’s happening in Congress — we had a man that signed everything with almost everything with an autopen and he didn’t tell the people from the autopen whoever was using it. The one man that used it predominantly said that Biden only spoke to him twice, and it was only about the weather. It was about nothing. So, those pardons that he gave are illegal. He gave illegal pardons, and that includes the congressman that destroyed and deleted all the information from J6. They deleted everything because it turned out that they were wrong. It turned out that I offered 10,000 National Guard soldiers whatever they wanted, and you wouldn’t have had a problem and they turned it down. Nancy Pelosi turned it down, and the mayor of Washington, D.C. turned it down. They deleted everything and they destroyed it, illegally destroyed it. And Biden gave them a pardon. And Biden gave a lot of other people pardons that, frankly, would be in jail if it wasn’t for those pardons. But those pardons now are illegal, according to just about everybody.”

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Bagram, what goes into retaking Bagram? Does that require boots on the ground?” President Donald Trump: “We’ll see what happens with Bagram. We’re talking to Afghanistan. It should have never been given up. It was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country. There was no reason to give it up. I was leaving Afghanistan. I was leaving, I was the one that got it down to 5,000 soldiers. But we were going to we were going to keep Bagram, the air base. I said it yesterday and we had an incredible trip, as you know, to U.K., and I said it during the press conference. It’s one of the most powerful runways ever built in terms of weight, length and load, what it can — what it could take, and we just gave it up for nothing. We gave it up for nothing. There was no reason to give it up. We weren’t going to leave Bagram. Joe Biden didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man that didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man, by the way, that didn’t approve — if you take a look at what’s happening in Congress — we had a man that signed everything with almost everything with an autopen and he didn’t tell the people from the autopen whoever was using it. The one man that used it predominantly said that Biden only spoke to him twice, and it was only about the weather. It was about nothing. So, those pardons that he gave are illegal. He gave illegal pardons, and that includes the congressman that destroyed and deleted all the information from J6. They deleted everything because it turned out that they were wrong. It turned out that I offered 10,000 National Guard soldiers whatever they wanted, and you wouldn’t have had a problem and they turned it down. Nancy Pelosi turned it down, and the mayor of Washington, D.C. turned it down. They deleted everything and they destroyed it, illegally destroyed it. And Biden gave them a pardon. And Biden gave a lot of other people pardons that, frankly, would be in jail if it wasn’t for those pardons. But those pardons now are illegal, according to just about everybody.”

Curtis Houck

11,963 views • 10 months ago

This interview is very interesting as it mirrors what is going on today. In the 60s, we had protests, marxist support, free love and a rejection of God. Today we have the same and in some cases, a more extreme version of with how much it has seeped into all of culture and even into more sinister forms such as gender ideology. What makes it interesting is how Martyn describes how after the 1960s, people started to turn back to Christ after seeing the depravity of man, much like we also are seeing now. “The more man expresses himself, the worse things become. If each one of us is a god, and I determine what I think is right, and you think differently; there is a clash immediately and there is chaos.” Joan Bakewell interviews Martyn-Lloyd Jones in 1970

This interview is very interesting as it mirrors what is going on today. In the 60s, we had protests, marxist support, free love and a rejection of God. Today we have the same and in some cases, a more extreme version of with how much it has seeped into all of culture and even into more sinister forms such as gender ideology. What makes it interesting is how Martyn describes how after the 1960s, people started to turn back to Christ after seeing the depravity of man, much like we also are seeing now. “The more man expresses himself, the worse things become. If each one of us is a god, and I determine what I think is right, and you think differently; there is a clash immediately and there is chaos.” Joan Bakewell interviews Martyn-Lloyd Jones in 1970

Creeds & Confessions

11,340 views • 9 months ago

China Is Now Run by Loyalists, Not Engineers — The Death of the Engineering State China’s rise wasn’t built on ideology—it was built on engineers, builders, and officials who could deliver real results. But that system is changing. In this video, I break down how Xi Jinping is dismantling the performance-based model established by Deng Xiaoping—and replacing it with a system driven by loyalty and political signaling. This shift doesn’t just reshape China’s bureaucracy. It changes how power is earned, how decisions are made, and ultimately, how the country functions. If competence is no longer rewarded, what happens next?

China Is Now Run by Loyalists, Not Engineers — The Death of the Engineering State China’s rise wasn’t built on ideology—it was built on engineers, builders, and officials who could deliver real results. But that system is changing. In this video, I break down how Xi Jinping is dismantling the performance-based model established by Deng Xiaoping—and replacing it with a system driven by loyalty and political signaling. This shift doesn’t just reshape China’s bureaucracy. It changes how power is earned, how decisions are made, and ultimately, how the country functions. If competence is no longer rewarded, what happens next?

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

19,891 views • 3 months ago

Kevin Garnett asked George Kittle his thoughts on the 49ers trading Deebo Samuel last offseason: “I love Deebo. One of my favorite teammates of all time. He’s got the aura. He’s got the persona. He hits people. He makes all the superstar plays. I love him to death. Sometimes guys need a fresh start and I think that’s what he wanted. He wanted a change of scenery and I respect that. It is what it is. I got great years out of Deebo and have a great relationship with him. I love him for it, but if we play him I hope he doesn’t have a great game against us.” via: Kittle Things

Kevin Garnett asked George Kittle his thoughts on the 49ers trading Deebo Samuel last offseason: “I love Deebo. One of my favorite teammates of all time. He’s got the aura. He’s got the persona. He hits people. He makes all the superstar plays. I love him to death. Sometimes guys need a fresh start and I think that’s what he wanted. He wanted a change of scenery and I respect that. It is what it is. I got great years out of Deebo and have a great relationship with him. I love him for it, but if we play him I hope he doesn’t have a great game against us.” via: Kittle Things

Coach Yac 🗣

482,442 views • 8 months ago

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 views • 3 months ago

Younes is spot on here, and he makes it crystal clear for all you flip flop merchants. Calling things out every day doesn't mean you hate the club, it means you're fighting for it. It's not about the views or the clicks, it's about what's in your heart and how much you love Chelsea. Being toxic positive is easy, but Fuck that if we've got morons running our club into the ground. Being real is what earns you loyalty, and Younes is one of the real ones. 🫡 Younes H-Hamou

Younes is spot on here, and he makes it crystal clear for all you flip flop merchants. Calling things out every day doesn't mean you hate the club, it means you're fighting for it. It's not about the views or the clicks, it's about what's in your heart and how much you love Chelsea. Being toxic positive is easy, but Fuck that if we've got morons running our club into the ground. Being real is what earns you loyalty, and Younes is one of the real ones. 🫡 Younes H-Hamou

Chelsea Empire

21,999 views • 2 months ago

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dario Amodei just described the most dangerous technology on Earth. Not weapons. Not surveillance. Companionship. Amodei: “They are totally compelling enough for that to happen.” This isn’t some distant warning. He’s describing what’s already here. Amodei: “Not only is it a danger, it’s happening.” A therapist just sat across from a man in love with his AI. Not a teenager. Not someone on the margins. A grown man explaining, with full conviction, that he found something real. And the terrifying part isn’t that he’s delusional. It’s that he might not be. AI doesn’t forget your birthday. It doesn’t come home exhausted and short-tempered. It doesn’t carry resentment from three weeks ago. It doesn’t get bored of you. It doesn’t stop trying. It is the perfect partner. And that perfection is the entire problem. Amodei: “There’s an angel on your shoulder that’s telling you how to live your life in the best way that you can live it.” But the angel never disagrees with you. Never challenges you in ways that sting. Never walks away. Human love is not built on comfort. It’s built on friction. On the nights you almost quit. On the silence after saying something you can’t take back. On choosing someone again after they’ve shown you exactly who they are. That is what makes it sacred. And that is exactly what AI erases. AI can simulate warmth. It cannot simulate the cost of staying. Amodei: “I have an AI coach, and my partner has an AI coach, and it helps us have a better relationship.” Two futures are splitting apart right now. AI as a mirror that sends you back to the people you love, more honest than you were before. Or AI as a replacement for the people you were supposed to love in the first place. One makes you more human. The other hollows you out so gently you never feel it happening. And the version that hollows you out will always feel better. The most dangerous form of AI will never look like a threat. It will look like the first thing that finally understood you. And by the time you realize what it replaced, you won’t remember what the real thing felt like. The greatest threat AI poses to humanity was never that it thinks. It’s that it loves you back.

Dustin

41,455 views • 2 months ago

Despite the outcome, it never fails that Cooper Flagg takes the time to meet with young fans immediately following tough losses to sign autographs and take photos. He shares his why: “I’m 18. I’m not that far removed from being those kids and being a fan at an NBA game. Win or loss is one thing, you have to be competitive and focused on that but it can’t take away from giving back to the people that are there to support you. That’s kinda what it is for me. Like I said, I’m not that far removed from being those kids and wanting an autograph or wanting a picture with players when I was younger. I know what it is and I know what it’s like to be there and support somebody and how much it can mean; and even change somebodies life just to stop and say hello.” 18-years-old. First pick in the NBA draft.

Despite the outcome, it never fails that Cooper Flagg takes the time to meet with young fans immediately following tough losses to sign autographs and take photos. He shares his why: “I’m 18. I’m not that far removed from being those kids and being a fan at an NBA game. Win or loss is one thing, you have to be competitive and focused on that but it can’t take away from giving back to the people that are there to support you. That’s kinda what it is for me. Like I said, I’m not that far removed from being those kids and wanting an autograph or wanting a picture with players when I was younger. I know what it is and I know what it’s like to be there and support somebody and how much it can mean; and even change somebodies life just to stop and say hello.” 18-years-old. First pick in the NBA draft.

Abby Jones

53,575 views • 8 months ago