Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Compilation: Examples of foreskin's gliding function + men cumming Foreskin's gliding feels heavenly. Can't ever get bored of how it feels 🤤 #foreskin #4skin #hotmen #cum #compilation #foreskinpride #completemanhood ❤️🍄 Functions of foreskin every man should know about: List of studies and researches expose the harm of circumcison: How... show more

Kem Kozlov

1,530 subscribers

14,437 次观看 • 16 天前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #foreskin #4skin #hotmen #cum #compilation #foreskinpride #completemanhood

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

It’s not JUST about the risks… it’s about the risks AND benefits All treatments for pain come with some rare but very serious adverse events… such as medications and even exercise! But spinal manipulations do not have any significant benefits for pain or function in the short or long term over placebos or other less risky treatments! So what’s the point! If the benefits of the treatment are non significant and other safer alternatives exist then it doesn’t matter how small the risks are… it’s just not worth! Now for all the comments of those with bias and deeply vested interests desperately trying to justify the use of manips by contorting themselves and the narrative into some extreme positions! 😎

It’s not JUST about the risks… it’s about the risks AND benefits All treatments for pain come with some rare but very serious adverse events… such as medications and even exercise! But spinal manipulations do not have any significant benefits for pain or function in the short or long term over placebos or other less risky treatments! So what’s the point! If the benefits of the treatment are non significant and other safer alternatives exist then it doesn’t matter how small the risks are… it’s just not worth! Now for all the comments of those with bias and deeply vested interests desperately trying to justify the use of manips by contorting themselves and the narrative into some extreme positions! 😎

The Sp⚽️rts Physio

23,310 次观看 • 10 个月前

I wanted to talk about the “harem” aspect of Chitose Is In The Ramune Bottle and how I feel it’s done differently than most “harem” shows. First of all yes all the heroines do have feelings for Saku, yes each of them know that they all have feelings for him and each heroine have a unique relationship with Saku when it comes down to their conversations and how they hang out. I think the biggest difference from other romcom/harem protagonist is Saku himself and how he is aware of all the girls liking him but because of his philosophy (the video i posted shows what Saku thinks about “falling in love”) he chooses not to pursue a relationship with anyone. The nature of the protagonist and the nature of the story/set up I feel is what makes it different from any other romcoms, it also doesn’t help that the author makes good cases for why Saku should be with (insert heroine) every moment with the cast feels like they can be a couple in any other series.

I wanted to talk about the “harem” aspect of Chitose Is In The Ramune Bottle and how I feel it’s done differently than most “harem” shows. First of all yes all the heroines do have feelings for Saku, yes each of them know that they all have feelings for him and each heroine have a unique relationship with Saku when it comes down to their conversations and how they hang out. I think the biggest difference from other romcom/harem protagonist is Saku himself and how he is aware of all the girls liking him but because of his philosophy (the video i posted shows what Saku thinks about “falling in love”) he chooses not to pursue a relationship with anyone. The nature of the protagonist and the nature of the story/set up I feel is what makes it different from any other romcoms, it also doesn’t help that the author makes good cases for why Saku should be with (insert heroine) every moment with the cast feels like they can be a couple in any other series.

MizuSawa

19,659 次观看 • 10 个月前

In 16 years of doing this work, I have never told anyone to stop taking their psychiatric medication. I do not know what is right for another person, and I have never claimed to. I share my story, basic facts about the mental health industry, and why informed choice matters. Here’s the problem: Most people never get to make a true choice regarding psychiatric diagnoses or treatments. They aren’t told about the unscientific underpinnings of the DSM, the comprehensive list of risks that come with taking psychiatric drugs, how absent their long-term safety and efficacy data is, or how hard it can be to get off them. Without that as a starting point, informed choice is impossible. Dr. Josef

In 16 years of doing this work, I have never told anyone to stop taking their psychiatric medication. I do not know what is right for another person, and I have never claimed to. I share my story, basic facts about the mental health industry, and why informed choice matters. Here’s the problem: Most people never get to make a true choice regarding psychiatric diagnoses or treatments. They aren’t told about the unscientific underpinnings of the DSM, the comprehensive list of risks that come with taking psychiatric drugs, how absent their long-term safety and efficacy data is, or how hard it can be to get off them. Without that as a starting point, informed choice is impossible. Dr. Josef

Laura Delano

17,823 次观看 • 1 个月前

He's right. And I don't mean that sarcastically, or cruelly, or unkindly. Men, that is your purpose, perhaps above all others. It is the very definition of masculinity. It is to give, always, more than you receive. It is not fair. It is not just. But it is the truth. Importantly, just like Batman, you are under no requirement to save everyone. You should be VERY discerning in this regard... But think carefully about every man you think highly of. All of them, every single last one, in stark terms produces more than he consumes. That is what it is to *be* a man. "But what if I need help?" Then you should seek it. And you should understand that the cloudy voice in your head telling you it would be better to self destruct is an animalistic thing, slamming its hand down on the dopamine button, pumping your head full of fantasies of glorious self sacrifice because it feels good in a moment when you're suffering most. Get it? That's why you're fantasizing about it. Because it feels good, in your moments of most terrible suffering, to see yourself as a hero. The very embodiment of self sacrificing masculinity. It counteracts the pain. It's self medication, it keeps you going. And so you slam down that fantasy button as things get worse and worse and worse... until it's not enough, until the fantasy could not only never be enough, but in order to survive the fantasy simply must start to translating into action. And thus it feels good again. Because now there's hope. There's a goal. The fantasy of being a self sacrificial hero is finally being backed up by action, evidence. "I will die usefully." And the conclusion of all of this is exactly what you expect it would be. Don't let it be.

He's right. And I don't mean that sarcastically, or cruelly, or unkindly. Men, that is your purpose, perhaps above all others. It is the very definition of masculinity. It is to give, always, more than you receive. It is not fair. It is not just. But it is the truth. Importantly, just like Batman, you are under no requirement to save everyone. You should be VERY discerning in this regard... But think carefully about every man you think highly of. All of them, every single last one, in stark terms produces more than he consumes. That is what it is to be a man. "But what if I need help?" Then you should seek it. And you should understand that the cloudy voice in your head telling you it would be better to self destruct is an animalistic thing, slamming its hand down on the dopamine button, pumping your head full of fantasies of glorious self sacrifice because it feels good in a moment when you're suffering most. Get it? That's why you're fantasizing about it. Because it feels good, in your moments of most terrible suffering, to see yourself as a hero. The very embodiment of self sacrificing masculinity. It counteracts the pain. It's self medication, it keeps you going. And so you slam down that fantasy button as things get worse and worse and worse... until it's not enough, until the fantasy could not only never be enough, but in order to survive the fantasy simply must start to translating into action. And thus it feels good again. Because now there's hope. There's a goal. The fantasy of being a self sacrificial hero is finally being backed up by action, evidence. "I will die usefully." And the conclusion of all of this is exactly what you expect it would be. Don't let it be.

BLACK DUMPLING™

10,901 次观看 • 13 天前

it really is amazing how the Western media class does endless propaganda about how Iran and its leaders are irrational fanatics who can't be trusted with a nuke, when a standard ritual every political leader in the West has to go through is to boast about how they would definitely without a moment's hesitation use nukes and mass murder millions of people, while praising the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as just and heroic. And of course the genocidal Israeli death-cult not only threatens to nuke Iran and others routinely, but has a policy to end all of humanity through a nuclear Holocaust if it ever feels it is at existential risk (look up the Samson Option). When Corbyn did not go along with this death-cult ritual and instead pointed to the horrific toll of launching a nuclear war, they went absolutely insane with rage and demanded he fall in line with the rest of the deranged genocidal Zionist political class and commit to the mass murder of babies, children, women and men. He refused. The girl at the end exposed the deranged lunacy of the pre-scripted audience questions.

it really is amazing how the Western media class does endless propaganda about how Iran and its leaders are irrational fanatics who can't be trusted with a nuke, when a standard ritual every political leader in the West has to go through is to boast about how they would definitely without a moment's hesitation use nukes and mass murder millions of people, while praising the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as just and heroic. And of course the genocidal Israeli death-cult not only threatens to nuke Iran and others routinely, but has a policy to end all of humanity through a nuclear Holocaust if it ever feels it is at existential risk (look up the Samson Option). When Corbyn did not go along with this death-cult ritual and instead pointed to the horrific toll of launching a nuclear war, they went absolutely insane with rage and demanded he fall in line with the rest of the deranged genocidal Zionist political class and commit to the mass murder of babies, children, women and men. He refused. The girl at the end exposed the deranged lunacy of the pre-scripted audience questions.

☀️👀

69,710 次观看 • 20 天前

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

“Terrorists, even when they are five, actually do harm, and people take that seriously. So FDLR, why no one would take them seriously, knowing their history, and knowing they are associated with a government in DRC. You have heard of hate speech and all kinds of things. Still, the issue becomes how many would they be? It is falsifying the issue of numbers; they are many, that’s a fact. But the essence of saying how many is like saying you are exaggerating. I have been asked by some leaders of Europe, how many are they likely to be? When somebody asks me that, I know he is interested in covering up the problem. When you talk about FDLR, the resolutions and statements at the UN are like a whisper. It is like Rwanda should not be taking action against them, as if they are not connected with the whole history or their responsibility in what they did here.” President Kagame

Presidency | Rwanda

42,382 次观看 • 9 个月前

If you’re an investing beginner, you MUST watch this video. If you’re an advanced investor, watch it as a reminder. Peter Lynch is the most successful Fund Manager of all time. He uses these 45 minutes to cover 95% of all of investing! My Key Takeaways: 1. Personal Edge - Look for the fields in which you have a knowledge benefit. Working in an industry, being a customer, all of that is an advantage. 2. The Key Organ for Investing: The Stomach - Investing is not about brains. It’s about having the stomach. “The real key to making money in stocks is not to get scared out of them.” - Peter Lynch 3. Categories - Categories and labels are guidelines, not hard rules. Successful investing is about flexibility. 4. P/E Rule of Thumb - Stocks follow Earnings Fairly Priced: P/E equals annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. Expensive: P/E extensively higher than annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. Cheap: P/E extensively lower than annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. 5. Balance Sheet Rules of Thumb - Is the BS healthy? a) Cash should be higher than Short-Term Debt b) If Cash - Short-term Debt - Long-Term Debt is only 1/4 of Net worth, the BS is decent c) Total Debt should equal 20% of capitalization or less 6. Focus on Stories - Stock prices move with the stories told about the companies. Have a long-term story for every company you own and check if it plays out. 7. Profit from Chaos - A market decline of at least 10% occurs every two years. Pick up your high-conviction bets at a discount when this happens. 8. Forget about Macroeconomics - Focus on business growth, not GDP growth. “If you spend 13 minutes a year on economics, you’ve wasted 10 minutes.” - Peter Lynch

If you’re an investing beginner, you MUST watch this video. If you’re an advanced investor, watch it as a reminder. Peter Lynch is the most successful Fund Manager of all time. He uses these 45 minutes to cover 95% of all of investing! My Key Takeaways: 1. Personal Edge - Look for the fields in which you have a knowledge benefit. Working in an industry, being a customer, all of that is an advantage. 2. The Key Organ for Investing: The Stomach - Investing is not about brains. It’s about having the stomach. “The real key to making money in stocks is not to get scared out of them.” - Peter Lynch 3. Categories - Categories and labels are guidelines, not hard rules. Successful investing is about flexibility. 4. P/E Rule of Thumb - Stocks follow Earnings Fairly Priced: P/E equals annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. Expensive: P/E extensively higher than annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. Cheap: P/E extensively lower than annual growth rate over the next 3-5 years. 5. Balance Sheet Rules of Thumb - Is the BS healthy? a) Cash should be higher than Short-Term Debt b) If Cash - Short-term Debt - Long-Term Debt is only 1/4 of Net worth, the BS is decent c) Total Debt should equal 20% of capitalization or less 6. Focus on Stories - Stock prices move with the stories told about the companies. Have a long-term story for every company you own and check if it plays out. 7. Profit from Chaos - A market decline of at least 10% occurs every two years. Pick up your high-conviction bets at a discount when this happens. 8. Forget about Macroeconomics - Focus on business growth, not GDP growth. “If you spend 13 minutes a year on economics, you’ve wasted 10 minutes.” - Peter Lynch

Daniel Mahncke

493,303 次观看 • 3 年前

-WHY DOES TECHNICAL ANALYSIS WORK!? -WILL IT ALWAYS WORK!? In this video I address a series of questions that are fundamental to our craft. Important ones for all of us to reflect on (answers are IMO and subjective). 0:00 - What is TA? Why does it work? 15:52 - Is it getting less effective and will TA one day not work? 22:35 - Why won't it stop working like many other edges? 28:35 - Why doesn't Citadel utilize it or have a TA desk? 33:01 - Does TA work better near-term or long-term? 38:35 - What about market interconnectedness? 39:35 - How long to know if you have edge? 42:00 - Why can't quant backtests match the edge of TA traders? 44:05 - Druck made 25% CAGR. Why are TA traders returns so high? Capital needed for skilled "league" trader to make $50k? 47:35 - Do TA traders need to adapt and evolve? 48:50 - Are all TA patterns created equal? 49:35 - Do rise of passive flows make TA harder?

-WHY DOES TECHNICAL ANALYSIS WORK!? -WILL IT ALWAYS WORK!? In this video I address a series of questions that are fundamental to our craft. Important ones for all of us to reflect on (answers are IMO and subjective). 0:00 - What is TA? Why does it work? 15:52 - Is it getting less effective and will TA one day not work? 22:35 - Why won't it stop working like many other edges? 28:35 - Why doesn't Citadel utilize it or have a TA desk? 33:01 - Does TA work better near-term or long-term? 38:35 - What about market interconnectedness? 39:35 - How long to know if you have edge? 42:00 - Why can't quant backtests match the edge of TA traders? 44:05 - Druck made 25% CAGR. Why are TA traders returns so high? Capital needed for skilled "league" trader to make $50k? 47:35 - Do TA traders need to adapt and evolve? 48:50 - Are all TA patterns created equal? 49:35 - Do rise of passive flows make TA harder?

Lance Breitstein 🇺🇸🌎

60,545 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jordan Peterson on a truth that should humble all of us: “I’ve never seen anyone get away with anything. Not even once.” You might twist the fabric of reality for a while — bend the rules, cut corners, play games — but it always snaps back. Sometimes years later, in ways you never saw coming. That’s why “the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.” Not terror, but deep respect for the order of things. You get away with nothing in the end. In a culture that increasingly celebrates short-term cleverness and moral flexibility, this is a sobering reminder that reality keeps perfect score. God is not mocked. Whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. What about you — have you ever watched someone “get away with it”… only for it to catch up with them later in unexpected ways?

Jordan Peterson on a truth that should humble all of us: “I’ve never seen anyone get away with anything. Not even once.” You might twist the fabric of reality for a while — bend the rules, cut corners, play games — but it always snaps back. Sometimes years later, in ways you never saw coming. That’s why “the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.” Not terror, but deep respect for the order of things. You get away with nothing in the end. In a culture that increasingly celebrates short-term cleverness and moral flexibility, this is a sobering reminder that reality keeps perfect score. God is not mocked. Whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. What about you — have you ever watched someone “get away with it”… only for it to catch up with them later in unexpected ways?

Camus

412,963 次观看 • 3 个月前

Today, I have a question. A pressing question. For some Western feminists. How can you remain silent, when women and girls are raped, tortured, their bodies carried around naked and spat on by bearded men shouting Allah Akbar? Then you can never call yourself a feminist again. Every day, including today, some Western hypocritical feminists should be ashamed of their silence on the horror that Hamas men inflicted to women and girls on 7 October. And that includes big names we were once proud of. Why are their lips sealed and their hearts of stone when it comes to the excruciating pain of Jewish women? The MeToo movement and so-called intersectional feminists do not care about all women. If they remain silent, it means they have lied to us about their commitment to women's rights. Their actions support the oppressor, not the victims. Also the EU money does. Indirectly. Those who say nothing about these women and the hostages, should not be standing here and speaking about human rights. When you are under attack by terrorists, a cease fire is like raising your hands when you are being shot at. Perhaps it is worth considering that a real lasting cease fire will start with bringing back all the hostages to their homes and the rapists to justice. Assita

Today, I have a question. A pressing question. For some Western feminists. How can you remain silent, when women and girls are raped, tortured, their bodies carried around naked and spat on by bearded men shouting Allah Akbar? Then you can never call yourself a feminist again. Every day, including today, some Western hypocritical feminists should be ashamed of their silence on the horror that Hamas men inflicted to women and girls on 7 October. And that includes big names we were once proud of. Why are their lips sealed and their hearts of stone when it comes to the excruciating pain of Jewish women? The MeToo movement and so-called intersectional feminists do not care about all women. If they remain silent, it means they have lied to us about their commitment to women's rights. Their actions support the oppressor, not the victims. Also the EU money does. Indirectly. Those who say nothing about these women and the hostages, should not be standing here and speaking about human rights. When you are under attack by terrorists, a cease fire is like raising your hands when you are being shot at. Perhaps it is worth considering that a real lasting cease fire will start with bringing back all the hostages to their homes and the rapists to justice. Assita

Assita Kanko MEP

4,669,843 次观看 • 2 年前

First clip from the first ever Math Academy Q&A: Jason Roberts’s philosophy of breadth-first development. 1. Ask yourself: “If we could clone ourselves and do everything in parallel, what’s all the stuff we’d be working on?” 2. Start doing as many of those things as you can possibly juggle 3. Put up with short-term pain, everything is hard, visible progress is slow, people doubt you 4. Come out with the correct generalizations so you’re not stuck in a bad situation when the concrete sets. “If you go too far down the line and you have lots of customers using stuff, you can't break things and go back. It's hardened. That's where you put the road, that's where the road is. It's too late to say, ‘we're going to create a new highway through this subdivision.’” It’s hard to overstate how painful breadth-first development is in the short term, but it’s equally hard to overstate how beneficial building the correct generalizations is for the long term.

First clip from the first ever Math Academy Q&A: Jason Roberts’s philosophy of breadth-first development. 1. Ask yourself: “If we could clone ourselves and do everything in parallel, what’s all the stuff we’d be working on?” 2. Start doing as many of those things as you can possibly juggle 3. Put up with short-term pain, everything is hard, visible progress is slow, people doubt you 4. Come out with the correct generalizations so you’re not stuck in a bad situation when the concrete sets. “If you go too far down the line and you have lots of customers using stuff, you can't break things and go back. It's hardened. That's where you put the road, that's where the road is. It's too late to say, ‘we're going to create a new highway through this subdivision.’” It’s hard to overstate how painful breadth-first development is in the short term, but it’s equally hard to overstate how beneficial building the correct generalizations is for the long term.

Justin Skycak

25,181 次观看 • 10 个月前

Happy to say I'm working with Byline Times and Byline TV to bring you regular films. This is about our National Trust and the right wing Tufton St set trying to get their hands on it. I've been a member of the National Trust for many years. It has 50,000 volunteers and 5 million members. It's the biggest conservation charity in Europe and is one of the largest landowners in the UK with over 620,000 and 780 miles of our coastline under its protection ....so obviously the right wing Tufton St pack want to get their hands on it. How? Through a company called Restore Trust - an opaquely funded "Tufton St set" organisation which has been attempting to get some of their ilk onto the National Trust Board. Of course they have. They've been on all the usual right wing media talking about how "woke" the National Trust is. Jaysus let's please not hear that word after we've seen off the Conservatives for ever at the next election. Jacob Rees Mogg thinks Restore Trust is marvellous, which kind of says all you need to know. They've failed to get their board candidates voted in for 3 consecutive years now. Long may that pattern continue 👍🏼👍🏼 Restore Trust puts out a lot of misinformation...so if ever you read anything of theirs, please treat it with extreme caution... Pls watch this short video and follow Byline Times and Byline TV for news you won't see much of elsewhere. Publishing without fear or favour. ❤️❤️

Happy to say I'm working with Byline Times and Byline TV to bring you regular films. This is about our National Trust and the right wing Tufton St set trying to get their hands on it. I've been a member of the National Trust for many years. It has 50,000 volunteers and 5 million members. It's the biggest conservation charity in Europe and is one of the largest landowners in the UK with over 620,000 and 780 miles of our coastline under its protection ....so obviously the right wing Tufton St pack want to get their hands on it. How? Through a company called Restore Trust - an opaquely funded "Tufton St set" organisation which has been attempting to get some of their ilk onto the National Trust Board. Of course they have. They've been on all the usual right wing media talking about how "woke" the National Trust is. Jaysus let's please not hear that word after we've seen off the Conservatives for ever at the next election. Jacob Rees Mogg thinks Restore Trust is marvellous, which kind of says all you need to know. They've failed to get their board candidates voted in for 3 consecutive years now. Long may that pattern continue 👍🏼👍🏼 Restore Trust puts out a lot of misinformation...so if ever you read anything of theirs, please treat it with extreme caution... Pls watch this short video and follow Byline Times and Byline TV for news you won't see much of elsewhere. Publishing without fear or favour. ❤️❤️

Carol Vorderman

476,436 次观看 • 2 年前

When I speak on a thing, it's from personal experience. I have PTSD, Major Depression, SAD, Mood Swing Disorder, & OCD. I spent many years in and out of mental facilities short and long term, tried nearly every psych med and experienced every side effect, went to a day treatment program five days a week for over a year, and attempted suicide five times. The last time I was comatose and it took me a year to recover. Through all of this, I came to know the signs of when things were beyond my control and 911 was my only backup. I also learned different coping mechanisms that have kept me out of mental facilities since 1997. One thing that still bothers me is when folk say someone is using mental illness to get attention. I was making more money than I could spend, my places were nicely decorated, and I wore new clothes almost everyday. Just think about that... What can Kai gain from talking about mental health? It can only help others going through struggles by him speaking about it openly. I'm proud of the man you've grown up to be Kai Cenat .

When I speak on a thing, it's from personal experience. I have PTSD, Major Depression, SAD, Mood Swing Disorder, & OCD. I spent many years in and out of mental facilities short and long term, tried nearly every psych med and experienced every side effect, went to a day treatment program five days a week for over a year, and attempted suicide five times. The last time I was comatose and it took me a year to recover. Through all of this, I came to know the signs of when things were beyond my control and 911 was my only backup. I also learned different coping mechanisms that have kept me out of mental facilities since 1997. One thing that still bothers me is when folk say someone is using mental illness to get attention. I was making more money than I could spend, my places were nicely decorated, and I wore new clothes almost everyday. Just think about that... What can Kai gain from talking about mental health? It can only help others going through struggles by him speaking about it openly. I'm proud of the man you've grown up to be Kai Cenat .

ijustlovepuzzles

42,344 次观看 • 8 个月前

NEW: Marjorie Taylor Greene on how many in Congress know the Covid jabs have killed "hundreds of thousands" of Americans, lack of Big Pharma liability "Probably under 40...willing to... admit... the Covid vaccine has...injured people and killed people" "These things were bad. And they are bad. And we have to face it and say it" "[But] people know it deep down" "They know it. But they're not willing to face that truth" "And the reason why is, most people are vaccinated" "If they face that truth, they have to face the truth [of] what are the long-term side effects that I myself may face, that I took several of these Covid vaccines" (Note: MTG did not herself get jabbed.) "Or, what are the long-term side effects for my children that I forced to get vaccinated. Or my elderly parents" "They have to face that truth, and the truth can be terrifying" "It's also [about them] owning being wrong" "These things were bad. And they are bad. And we have to face it and say it... But then that also brings the next level... and it's the one that's really stopping that from happening, and that is forcing the pharmaceutical companies to own the liability" "And that is a wall right now that can't be penetrated" Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

NEW: Marjorie Taylor Greene on how many in Congress know the Covid jabs have killed "hundreds of thousands" of Americans, lack of Big Pharma liability "Probably under 40...willing to... admit... the Covid vaccine has...injured people and killed people" "These things were bad. And they are bad. And we have to face it and say it" "[But] people know it deep down" "They know it. But they're not willing to face that truth" "And the reason why is, most people are vaccinated" "If they face that truth, they have to face the truth [of] what are the long-term side effects that I myself may face, that I took several of these Covid vaccines" (Note: MTG did not herself get jabbed.) "Or, what are the long-term side effects for my children that I forced to get vaccinated. Or my elderly parents" "They have to face that truth, and the truth can be terrifying" "It's also [about them] owning being wrong" "These things were bad. And they are bad. And we have to face it and say it... But then that also brings the next level... and it's the one that's really stopping that from happening, and that is forcing the pharmaceutical companies to own the liability" "And that is a wall right now that can't be penetrated" Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 Steve Kirsch Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

Sense Receptor

140,976 次观看 • 3 个月前

TUCKER CARLSON: “I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are like way better than Warren Buffett’s. How does that happen? Does anyone ever talk about that internally, like on the hill?” TULSI GABBARD: “No, because most of them benefit from it ... No member of Congress or the Senate or their spouse or their senior staff should be allowed to trade in stocks, period, full stop ... There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. TUCKER CARLSON: “That’s a no-brainer to me.” TULSI GABBARD: “It’s just common sense that we have people in great positions of power. Why should they be forced to do something (not trade stocks while serving) with the passage of a law? Why don’t they just do the right thing and say, you know what, we get that even an innocent thing could be perceived as insider trading? We’re just not going to go there.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Because it’s too lucrative to give up.” TULSI GABBARD: “And they know they can get away with it.”

TUCKER CARLSON: “I have no clue at all how Nancy Pelosi is just so rich or how her stock picks are like way better than Warren Buffett’s. How does that happen? Does anyone ever talk about that internally, like on the hill?” TULSI GABBARD: “No, because most of them benefit from it ... No member of Congress or the Senate or their spouse or their senior staff should be allowed to trade in stocks, period, full stop ... There should be no perception that our elected leaders are profiting off of the knowledge that they have as policymakers that directly impact industry and businesses. TUCKER CARLSON: “That’s a no-brainer to me.” TULSI GABBARD: “It’s just common sense that we have people in great positions of power. Why should they be forced to do something (not trade stocks while serving) with the passage of a law? Why don’t they just do the right thing and say, you know what, we get that even an innocent thing could be perceived as insider trading? We’re just not going to go there.” TUCKER CARLSON: “Because it’s too lucrative to give up.” TULSI GABBARD: “And they know they can get away with it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,072,821 次观看 • 2 年前

PEDO BLACKMAIL: THE PATTERN NOBODY WANTS TO SEE Stick around long enough in this world and you stop seeing “coincidences.” You start seeing patterns and they’re always uglier than you expect. But first, let’s talk about the video. Zherka’s right about blackmail: one frame, one angle, one millisecond and boom. You’re fooked. A life destroyed. A will captured. A leash tightened. Once they have the image, they own the soul. But here’s the real question: Why is this truth, this razor-sharp analysis of how power actually works coming from a guy who is himself controlled, initiated, and dripping with pedo behavior? (See post below) Why do the compromised always reveal the mechanics of compromise? Why do the paid shills always accuse others of being paid? Why do they literally teach you how to spot controlled opposition while being controlled opposition? Why do gender-inverted satanic freaks expose gender inversion in Hollywood? Why do occultists evangelize the “Great Awakening”? Why do trauma-programmed puppets expose trauma-programmed puppets? Why do the wolves explain the behavior of wolves? Do you see the sleight of hand yet? This is the real ritual: They reveal just enough truth the kind that makes you trust them so they can shape the rest of your reality. Truth becomes bait. Confession becomes camouflage. Exposure becomes recruitment. They’re not warning you. They’re initiating you while setting and controlling the Overton window. The hierarchy of their mystery religion is being externalized, piece by piece, through the mouths of the damned, because that’s how cults grow. And now the big one: Why is the Epstein list being pushed, defended, weaponized, and suffocated by people who every last one of them is either ON it or orbiting it? Ask yourself: Why do the guilty always lead the charge to “expose” guilt? Answer: Because revealing the truth is one of the most powerful forms of control. In order to be betrayed one must first truth. Remember that! And every disclosure you’re being fed… is part of a script to subvert and control you, not to enlighten and free you. [I’ll link examples of in comments to help you visualize how they’re exactly what they expose 👇🏻]

PEDO BLACKMAIL: THE PATTERN NOBODY WANTS TO SEE Stick around long enough in this world and you stop seeing “coincidences.” You start seeing patterns and they’re always uglier than you expect. But first, let’s talk about the video. Zherka’s right about blackmail: one frame, one angle, one millisecond and boom. You’re fooked. A life destroyed. A will captured. A leash tightened. Once they have the image, they own the soul. But here’s the real question: Why is this truth, this razor-sharp analysis of how power actually works coming from a guy who is himself controlled, initiated, and dripping with pedo behavior? (See post below) Why do the compromised always reveal the mechanics of compromise? Why do the paid shills always accuse others of being paid? Why do they literally teach you how to spot controlled opposition while being controlled opposition? Why do gender-inverted satanic freaks expose gender inversion in Hollywood? Why do occultists evangelize the “Great Awakening”? Why do trauma-programmed puppets expose trauma-programmed puppets? Why do the wolves explain the behavior of wolves? Do you see the sleight of hand yet? This is the real ritual: They reveal just enough truth the kind that makes you trust them so they can shape the rest of your reality. Truth becomes bait. Confession becomes camouflage. Exposure becomes recruitment. They’re not warning you. They’re initiating you while setting and controlling the Overton window. The hierarchy of their mystery religion is being externalized, piece by piece, through the mouths of the damned, because that’s how cults grow. And now the big one: Why is the Epstein list being pushed, defended, weaponized, and suffocated by people who every last one of them is either ON it or orbiting it? Ask yourself: Why do the guilty always lead the charge to “expose” guilt? Answer: Because revealing the truth is one of the most powerful forms of control. In order to be betrayed one must first truth. Remember that! And every disclosure you’re being fed… is part of a script to subvert and control you, not to enlighten and free you. [I’ll link examples of in comments to help you visualize how they’re exactly what they expose 👇🏻]

Sir Escanor (𝘏𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘶𝘮 𝘚𝘭𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘳)

24,891 次观看 • 9 个月前

Spoke with David Buss, a pioneer in human mating psychology. He’s one of the few people who’s actually studied why men and women choose each other the way they do — across cultures & time. We got into the basics of his work, how evolutionary psychology formed as a field, and why some of Freud’s ideas make sense in a modern context. We spoke about long-term vs short-term mating, why people pick bad partners, what makes someone “high value,” and the lies men and women tell each other without even realising it. Other Topics that we covered — emotional vs sexual cheating, why some patterns repeat across societies, what dating apps have done to us, and why men and women want such different things from each other. Episode attached in both English and Hindi Dubbed Timestamps ↓ 00:00 – What He Studies 04:36 – Freud’s Big Shift 05:55 – What Is Evolutionary Psychology 09:50 – Are Female Orgasms Necessary? 14:30 – Who Pays More for Bad Partners? 16:21 – Long-Term vs Short-Term Relationships 24:22 – Male vs Female Preferences 35:23 – Media Myths About Beauty 47:18 – Why Women Like Bad Boys 56:32 – Why Women Choose Status 01:00:52 – Lies Men & Women Tell 01:06:53 – Dating Patterns in India 01:11:33 – Emotional vs Sexual Cheating 01:14:47 – Are Humans Monogamous? 01:19:35 – Why Men Prefer Younger Women 01:22:06 – How Dating Apps Changed Mating 01:30:10 – Dating an AI 01:33:40 – Male vs Female Sexual Preferences 01:35:40 – Why Women Like Funny Men 01:37:31 – David on the Red Pill 01:39:32 – Does He Believe in Love?

Spoke with David Buss, a pioneer in human mating psychology. He’s one of the few people who’s actually studied why men and women choose each other the way they do — across cultures & time. We got into the basics of his work, how evolutionary psychology formed as a field, and why some of Freud’s ideas make sense in a modern context. We spoke about long-term vs short-term mating, why people pick bad partners, what makes someone “high value,” and the lies men and women tell each other without even realising it. Other Topics that we covered — emotional vs sexual cheating, why some patterns repeat across societies, what dating apps have done to us, and why men and women want such different things from each other. Episode attached in both English and Hindi Dubbed Timestamps ↓ 00:00 – What He Studies 04:36 – Freud’s Big Shift 05:55 – What Is Evolutionary Psychology 09:50 – Are Female Orgasms Necessary? 14:30 – Who Pays More for Bad Partners? 16:21 – Long-Term vs Short-Term Relationships 24:22 – Male vs Female Preferences 35:23 – Media Myths About Beauty 47:18 – Why Women Like Bad Boys 56:32 – Why Women Choose Status 01:00:52 – Lies Men & Women Tell 01:06:53 – Dating Patterns in India 01:11:33 – Emotional vs Sexual Cheating 01:14:47 – Are Humans Monogamous? 01:19:35 – Why Men Prefer Younger Women 01:22:06 – How Dating Apps Changed Mating 01:30:10 – Dating an AI 01:33:40 – Male vs Female Sexual Preferences 01:35:40 – Why Women Like Funny Men 01:37:31 – David on the Red Pill 01:39:32 – Does He Believe in Love?

Prakhar Gupta

27,823 次观看 • 9 个月前

Markets change. Human nature doesn’t. Cliff Asness (Clifford Asness) joins Infinite Loops to discuss the gamification of markets, and why extreme valuations keep returning despite decades of data. We explore how trading apps change behavior, why speculation feels productive, and what gets lost when investing becomes entertainment. If you care about long-term thinking in a short-term world, this episode is for you. TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Intro 1:10 Losses Hurt More than the Wins 6:20 Dot-Com Bubble vs. the 2020 Tech Bubble 13:30 Meme Stocks, Robinhood, and Gamified Investing 21:40 Asness Doesn’t Know Which Stocks He Owns 29:10 Quant Discipline, Models, and Looking Stupid 38:30 Market Crisesand Volatility 52:10 Human Nature as the Last Investing Edge 1:04:40 AI and “Surrendering to the Machines” 1:23:50 Forecasting Bubbles 1:37:40 Private Equity and Volatility Laundering 1:55:30 What Asness Would Change If He Ran the World

Markets change. Human nature doesn’t. Cliff Asness (Clifford Asness) joins Infinite Loops to discuss the gamification of markets, and why extreme valuations keep returning despite decades of data. We explore how trading apps change behavior, why speculation feels productive, and what gets lost when investing becomes entertainment. If you care about long-term thinking in a short-term world, this episode is for you. TIMESTAMPS: 0:00 Intro 1:10 Losses Hurt More than the Wins 6:20 Dot-Com Bubble vs. the 2020 Tech Bubble 13:30 Meme Stocks, Robinhood, and Gamified Investing 21:40 Asness Doesn’t Know Which Stocks He Owns 29:10 Quant Discipline, Models, and Looking Stupid 38:30 Market Crisesand Volatility 52:10 Human Nature as the Last Investing Edge 1:04:40 AI and “Surrendering to the Machines” 1:23:50 Forecasting Bubbles 1:37:40 Private Equity and Volatility Laundering 1:55:30 What Asness Would Change If He Ran the World

Infinite Loops 🎙

184,180 次观看 • 7 个月前