Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

COMPLETE CHARLIE KIRK EVACUATION TIMELINE Ian Carroll Candace Owens Project Constitution Blake Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 James Li START 12:23:30 PM Utah Time 00:00 Charlie Shot 00:18 Security begins to move Charlie 00:27 Terryl Farnsworth already in position on the rock pile filming 00:31 Charlie loaded into SUV 00:33 Mikey...

BasedSamParker's profile picture

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

139,844 subscribers

103,769 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I wanted to explain the TPUSA staff and security communication. *Allegedly, in my opinion: 1. Hunter finds out the assassination is happening during his mic time and says “shit.” 2. The redhead beside Hunter points to the area the communication is coming from and gives a thumbs up while security signals they got it too. 3. Terryl gets frustrated at the redhead’s thumbs up and starts venting to Blake Neff and Mikey McCoy, and Mikey shushes him. It looks to me like Charlie knew. I could be wrong. Let me know your thoughts. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Stew Peters Ian Carroll Coach Colin
25:32

I wanted to explain the TPUSA staff and security communication. *Allegedly, in my opinion: 1. Hunter finds out the assassination is happening during his mic time and says “shit.” 2. The redhead beside Hunter points to the area the communication is coming from and gives a thumbs up while security signals they got it too. 3. Terryl gets frustrated at the redhead’s thumbs up and starts venting to Blake Neff and Mikey McCoy, and Mikey shushes him. It looks to me like Charlie knew. I could be wrong. Let me know your thoughts. Candace Owens Baron Coleman Stew Peters Ian Carroll Coach Colin

Honest Ash

79,587 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bret Weinstein, Viva Frei and Jimmy Dore tangle over who shot Charlie Kirk, and how. 00:00:00 Three people, three positions, one killing 00:01:16 Sponsor: SaunaSpace 00:03:39 Sponsor: MUD\WTR 00:05:27 Where each of us has landed as of today 00:05:47 Viva Frei: it was a bullet from the Losee roof 00:08:41 Jimmy Dore: the case for a cover-up 00:16:41 When a Question Becomes an Accusation 00:18:15 Morality as a Substitute for Argument 00:21:27 Sponsor: Helix 00:22:42 A Biologist's Toolkit 00:25:35 George Zinn and the Reflex to Confess 00:29:42 Paving the Courtyard 00:38:11 The Exploding Microphone 00:45:09 Joe Kent Says He Was Stopped 00:46:50 The Mic That Should Have Recorded It 00:52:58 O'Neill, the Hamptons, and 39 Minutes 00:57:28 "You Don't Have an FBI" 00:59:26 Butler and the Roof Nobody Covered 01:06:27 Harpole, Shawn Ryan, and the Drones 01:11:48 The Prosecutor's Fallacy 01:15:29 Drones and a Plane at 200 Feet 01:22:06 Foreign Nexus, or Domestic 01:29:07 Retroactive Continuity 01:33:21 What Ballistics Can and Cannot Show 01:38:10 A Potemkin Explanation 01:44:14 TPUSA After Charlie 01:49:20 Iran, Motive, and What Charlie Opposed 01:51:26 "Who I Fear Is the People..." 01:56:31 A Nation, or Whatever Controls It 02:00:43 The Phone, the Necklace, the Car 02:04:39 The Emergency Cleanup Order 02:07:20 When No Answer Will Be Believed 02:09:34 Conspiracy Psychosis 02:10:47 Closing Thoughts
2:11:24

Bret Weinstein, Viva Frei and Jimmy Dore tangle over who shot Charlie Kirk, and how. 00:00:00 Three people, three positions, one killing 00:01:16 Sponsor: SaunaSpace 00:03:39 Sponsor: MUD\WTR 00:05:27 Where each of us has landed as of today 00:05:47 Viva Frei: it was a bullet from the Losee roof 00:08:41 Jimmy Dore: the case for a cover-up 00:16:41 When a Question Becomes an Accusation 00:18:15 Morality as a Substitute for Argument 00:21:27 Sponsor: Helix 00:22:42 A Biologist's Toolkit 00:25:35 George Zinn and the Reflex to Confess 00:29:42 Paving the Courtyard 00:38:11 The Exploding Microphone 00:45:09 Joe Kent Says He Was Stopped 00:46:50 The Mic That Should Have Recorded It 00:52:58 O'Neill, the Hamptons, and 39 Minutes 00:57:28 "You Don't Have an FBI" 00:59:26 Butler and the Roof Nobody Covered 01:06:27 Harpole, Shawn Ryan, and the Drones 01:11:48 The Prosecutor's Fallacy 01:15:29 Drones and a Plane at 200 Feet 01:22:06 Foreign Nexus, or Domestic 01:29:07 Retroactive Continuity 01:33:21 What Ballistics Can and Cannot Show 01:38:10 A Potemkin Explanation 01:44:14 TPUSA After Charlie 01:49:20 Iran, Motive, and What Charlie Opposed 01:51:26 "Who I Fear Is the People..." 01:56:31 A Nation, or Whatever Controls It 02:00:43 The Phone, the Necklace, the Car 02:04:39 The Emergency Cleanup Order 02:07:20 When No Answer Will Be Believed 02:09:34 Conspiracy Psychosis 02:10:47 Closing Thoughts

Bret Weinstein

327,142 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

CHARLIE KIRK & THE MYSTERIOUS MISSING 911 CALL Brian Harpole claims they called 911 on the way to the hospital. But, when they arrived, he says the hospital didn't know they were coming. I GRAMA requested all the 911 calls from September 10th & Utah sent me 20 calls back. I was keenly interested in hearing this particular call. One problem: none of the calls were from the security team. Not only is there no record of this alleged call, but when you listen to Harpole & Frank Turek recount the hazardous hospital trip, you'll realize that it's extremely unlikely anyone in the SUV had the bandwidth or capability to even make a 911 call, which probably would have lasted 1-2 minutes MINIMUM (likely more). Maybe it's nothing. But it's one of those small, yet significant details that just doesn't seem to add up. Did Utah lose the call? Did Harpole mis-remember a 2-minute call that never happened? Did he make the story up? None of these is an attractive option. And btw, why didn't anyone else from TPUSA call 911? (Mikey McCoy called Erika Kirk, Elizabeth McCoy & Rob McCoy; Blake Neff called his mom; Terryl Farnsworth called the A/V techs back in AZ). What if nobody actually called 911? What if nobody notified the hospital? What if it had turned out that Charlie's life had hung in the balance over a few precious moments? Given there was no way for any of them to know that it didn't, I find this an egregious oversight. Watch this and let me know what you think and/or what I might have missed.
8:57

CHARLIE KIRK & THE MYSTERIOUS MISSING 911 CALL Brian Harpole claims they called 911 on the way to the hospital. But, when they arrived, he says the hospital didn't know they were coming. I GRAMA requested all the 911 calls from September 10th & Utah sent me 20 calls back. I was keenly interested in hearing this particular call. One problem: none of the calls were from the security team. Not only is there no record of this alleged call, but when you listen to Harpole & Frank Turek recount the hazardous hospital trip, you'll realize that it's extremely unlikely anyone in the SUV had the bandwidth or capability to even make a 911 call, which probably would have lasted 1-2 minutes MINIMUM (likely more). Maybe it's nothing. But it's one of those small, yet significant details that just doesn't seem to add up. Did Utah lose the call? Did Harpole mis-remember a 2-minute call that never happened? Did he make the story up? None of these is an attractive option. And btw, why didn't anyone else from TPUSA call 911? (Mikey McCoy called Erika Kirk, Elizabeth McCoy & Rob McCoy; Blake Neff called his mom; Terryl Farnsworth called the A/V techs back in AZ). What if nobody actually called 911? What if nobody notified the hospital? What if it had turned out that Charlie's life had hung in the balance over a few precious moments? Given there was no way for any of them to know that it didn't, I find this an egregious oversight. Watch this and let me know what you think and/or what I might have missed.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1,196,565 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Hmmmm… 🤔 David Hull (Utah Department of Public Safety officer and lead investigator) — Says TPUSA Videographer Terryl Farnsworth gave a FLASH DRIVE of the Charlie Assassination footage from the cameras to a local agency Timeout… ✋Over and over again… we were told that he immediately gave the SD Cards to authorities. Now we find that he took the SD card(s) and took the time to put them on a flash drive? Huh? Why? Tyler Robinson’s defense says they want to cross examine Terryl Farnsworth now.. to see if they’ve been altered in any way “because clips were being made out of the larger videos— even his own statement says he sent larger videos and these were just a small portion, so obviously someone made clips and we don’t know who or how…” Reminder: 1. Terryl Farnsworth is the same person who prematurely announced on social media that Charlie was dead.. 2. Terryl Farnsworth is the same person who 5 minutes Charlie was assassinated, stood on the chair that Charlie died in to collect the SD cards from the cameras Not saying Terryl Farnsworth is guilty of anything… but there are quite a few inconsistencies and red flags that just keep popping up. I have to admit, it’s weird. Flash Drive, not SD Cards Farnsworth Announcing SD Cards taken 5 min after
3:56

Hmmmm… 🤔 David Hull (Utah Department of Public Safety officer and lead investigator) — Says TPUSA Videographer Terryl Farnsworth gave a FLASH DRIVE of the Charlie Assassination footage from the cameras to a local agency Timeout… ✋Over and over again… we were told that he immediately gave the SD Cards to authorities. Now we find that he took the SD card(s) and took the time to put them on a flash drive? Huh? Why? Tyler Robinson’s defense says they want to cross examine Terryl Farnsworth now.. to see if they’ve been altered in any way “because clips were being made out of the larger videos— even his own statement says he sent larger videos and these were just a small portion, so obviously someone made clips and we don’t know who or how…” Reminder: 1. Terryl Farnsworth is the same person who prematurely announced on social media that Charlie was dead.. 2. Terryl Farnsworth is the same person who 5 minutes Charlie was assassinated, stood on the chair that Charlie died in to collect the SD cards from the cameras Not saying Terryl Farnsworth is guilty of anything… but there are quite a few inconsistencies and red flags that just keep popping up. I have to admit, it’s weird. Flash Drive, not SD Cards Farnsworth Announcing SD Cards taken 5 min after

MJTruthUltra

101,567 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff address the controversial video of Mikey McCoy right after Charlie was Shot 🔻 Blake Neff: — we both heard a loud crack, we both saw Charlie get shot and reacted, we both said we need to get out of here. Mikey’s lip was quivering. He was freaked out. I think what he said to me was, I need to call Eirka. He called Erika. Then he called his dad Rob McCoy. 🔻Andrew Kolvet: — I wasn’t there, but I talked to Mikey… he couldn’t remember all that transpired. He said he called Erika and his dad. He immediately turned around because Charlie drilled it into his brain to take these steps in case something ever happened. He says Mikey was not on the phone immediately. He was taking social videos and he’d send to our group chat, which we’d then put on our socials. And when the shot happened, he put his hands over his ears with his phone still in his hand. He was not on his phone. 🔻 My Thoughts: I appreciate the fact that they addressed this Instead of leaving it open which only fuels speculation. People can choose to accept this or not.. I have to accept this at face value. If they said that’s what happened, ok, I’ll will give them benefit of the doubt. I hope pastor Rob McCoy addresses why he said Mikey was covered in blood. Did he misspeak? Was he talking about too many things/people at the same time and his words were not well understood?
9:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff address the controversial video of Mikey McCoy right after Charlie was Shot 🔻 Blake Neff: — we both heard a loud crack, we both saw Charlie get shot and reacted, we both said we need to get out of here. Mikey’s lip was quivering. He was freaked out. I think what he said to me was, I need to call Eirka. He called Erika. Then he called his dad Rob McCoy. 🔻Andrew Kolvet: — I wasn’t there, but I talked to Mikey… he couldn’t remember all that transpired. He said he called Erika and his dad. He immediately turned around because Charlie drilled it into his brain to take these steps in case something ever happened. He says Mikey was not on the phone immediately. He was taking social videos and he’d send to our group chat, which we’d then put on our socials. And when the shot happened, he put his hands over his ears with his phone still in his hand. He was not on his phone. 🔻 My Thoughts: I appreciate the fact that they addressed this Instead of leaving it open which only fuels speculation. People can choose to accept this or not.. I have to accept this at face value. If they said that’s what happened, ok, I’ll will give them benefit of the doubt. I hope pastor Rob McCoy addresses why he said Mikey was covered in blood. Did he misspeak? Was he talking about too many things/people at the same time and his words were not well understood?

MJTruthUltra

2,719,318 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

From a Thai prison cell to a fintech empire processing $1.6B in international payments across 40+ banks and 250M+ users. Jonathan Low (Jonathan Low). Forbes 40 Under 40. Author of "Cell to CEO." We covered prison, banking for AI agents, RWA projects, the future of crypto in banking, vibe coding for trading, and the businesses that win the next 5 years. ⏱ Timestamps: 00:00:00 — Teaser 00:00:46 — Who is Jonathan Low 00:01:35 — What Jonathan's life was like before prison 00:02:13 — How and why Jonathan ended up in prison 00:02:57 — Prison conditions: expectations vs reality 00:07:33 — Prison became the greatest blessing 00:09:12 — How the entrepreneurial journey began after prison 00:10:34 — Why social capital matters 00:11:06 — Launched own club and took it to the top in 3 months 00:12:09 — Built an Axie Infinity gaming guild during COVID 00:13:49 — The beginning of the BipTap Group journey 00:17:23 — How Jonathan built his own banking system 00:20:07 — How to get a crypto card 00:22:03 — How much it costs to launch a white-label solution with BipTap 00:22:58 — Banking for AI agents 00:25:57 — How to build an RWA project 00:27:45 — Future of cryptocurrencies in banking 00:32:08 — The business verticals within Empire Group 00:32:48 — What Jonathan invests his money in 00:33:54 — How relationships with regulators are built 00:34:43 — Implementing AI in business 00:36:28 — Vibe coding in trading 00:40:06 — Advice for first-time founders 00:43:36 — From construction to trading: Ruslan Khairullin's journey 00:44:57 — Inner peace: why calmness is essential for founders 00:50:39 — Work-life balance for entrepreneurs 00:53:47 — $1.5 million in 24 hours on TST coin 00:55:11 — The best way to capture a market 00:55:57 — Banking for nations Watch the full conversation and let me know which part you liked the most 👇
58:52

From a Thai prison cell to a fintech empire processing $1.6B in international payments across 40+ banks and 250M+ users. Jonathan Low (Jonathan Low). Forbes 40 Under 40. Author of "Cell to CEO." We covered prison, banking for AI agents, RWA projects, the future of crypto in banking, vibe coding for trading, and the businesses that win the next 5 years. ⏱ Timestamps: 00:00:00 — Teaser 00:00:46 — Who is Jonathan Low 00:01:35 — What Jonathan's life was like before prison 00:02:13 — How and why Jonathan ended up in prison 00:02:57 — Prison conditions: expectations vs reality 00:07:33 — Prison became the greatest blessing 00:09:12 — How the entrepreneurial journey began after prison 00:10:34 — Why social capital matters 00:11:06 — Launched own club and took it to the top in 3 months 00:12:09 — Built an Axie Infinity gaming guild during COVID 00:13:49 — The beginning of the BipTap Group journey 00:17:23 — How Jonathan built his own banking system 00:20:07 — How to get a crypto card 00:22:03 — How much it costs to launch a white-label solution with BipTap 00:22:58 — Banking for AI agents 00:25:57 — How to build an RWA project 00:27:45 — Future of cryptocurrencies in banking 00:32:08 — The business verticals within Empire Group 00:32:48 — What Jonathan invests his money in 00:33:54 — How relationships with regulators are built 00:34:43 — Implementing AI in business 00:36:28 — Vibe coding in trading 00:40:06 — Advice for first-time founders 00:43:36 — From construction to trading: Ruslan Khairullin's journey 00:44:57 — Inner peace: why calmness is essential for founders 00:50:39 — Work-life balance for entrepreneurs 00:53:47 — $1.5 million in 24 hours on TST coin 00:55:11 — The best way to capture a market 00:55:57 — Banking for nations Watch the full conversation and let me know which part you liked the most 👇

Ruslan Khairullin

16,872 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 EXPOSED: How Frank Turek Just ACCIDENTALLY Exposed The Sept 10th Cover-Up—Erika Had To Have Allegedly Traveled On An EARLIER Flight To Utah 😱 Candace Owens just broke down a massive new piece of the puzzle regarding the timeline of September 10th, and it completely shatters the official story about the infamous "tarmac hug" between Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. If you thought the timeline was messy before, wait until you see this math. THE FRANK TUREK TIMELINE Frank Turek (a former Navy officer and one of the only people who hasn't been caught lying in this entire saga) gave an interview detailing the events at the hospital. Because he is a military man, he is incredibly precise with time. He stated on the record that Erika Kirk arrived at the hospital around 4:00 PM. THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Here is why that completely destroys the official narrative: TPUSA and Erika claim that she met Andrew Kolvet on the runway when his plane landed from Santa Barbara. The problem? That plane didn't land in Provo until 4:40 PM. * It is a 20-minute drive from the airport to the hospital with zero traffic. By the time you factor in deplaning, the emotional tarmac hug, moving to the cars, and driving to the hospital in the middle of an active manhunt with SWAT teams everywhere, the absolute earliest they could have arrived at the hospital is 5:15 PM. If Erika met Andrew's plane at 4:40 PM, she could not have been at the hospital at 4:00 PM. The math is impossible. THE ONLY WAY IT WORKS Candace believes both Frank Turek AND Andrew Kolvet are telling the truth. She believes the tarmac hug really happened, and she believes they arrived at the hospital at 4:00 PM. There is only one way both of those things can be true: Erika Kirk had to have flown into Utah on an entirely different, earlier flight. And the only plane that fits that timeline? Charlie Kirk's plane, which landed at 3:31 PM. That would give them exactly enough time to have the tarmac hug, deplane, get a police escort, and arrive at the hospital by 4:00 PM, exactly as Frank Turek stated. THE BOTTOM LINE Every time we find a discrepancy between Andrew Kolvet's story and Erika Kirk's story, it turns out Erika is the one lying. She threw Andrew under the bus regarding the 30-06 caliber text, and she is throwing him under the bus now. Erika was not on that 4:40 PM flight. The official story is a fabrication. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇
7:21

🚨 EXPOSED: How Frank Turek Just ACCIDENTALLY Exposed The Sept 10th Cover-Up—Erika Had To Have Allegedly Traveled On An EARLIER Flight To Utah 😱 Candace Owens just broke down a massive new piece of the puzzle regarding the timeline of September 10th, and it completely shatters the official story about the infamous "tarmac hug" between Andrew Kolvet and Erika Kirk. If you thought the timeline was messy before, wait until you see this math. THE FRANK TUREK TIMELINE Frank Turek (a former Navy officer and one of the only people who hasn't been caught lying in this entire saga) gave an interview detailing the events at the hospital. Because he is a military man, he is incredibly precise with time. He stated on the record that Erika Kirk arrived at the hospital around 4:00 PM. THE LOGISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY Here is why that completely destroys the official narrative: TPUSA and Erika claim that she met Andrew Kolvet on the runway when his plane landed from Santa Barbara. The problem? That plane didn't land in Provo until 4:40 PM. * It is a 20-minute drive from the airport to the hospital with zero traffic. By the time you factor in deplaning, the emotional tarmac hug, moving to the cars, and driving to the hospital in the middle of an active manhunt with SWAT teams everywhere, the absolute earliest they could have arrived at the hospital is 5:15 PM. If Erika met Andrew's plane at 4:40 PM, she could not have been at the hospital at 4:00 PM. The math is impossible. THE ONLY WAY IT WORKS Candace believes both Frank Turek AND Andrew Kolvet are telling the truth. She believes the tarmac hug really happened, and she believes they arrived at the hospital at 4:00 PM. There is only one way both of those things can be true: Erika Kirk had to have flown into Utah on an entirely different, earlier flight. And the only plane that fits that timeline? Charlie Kirk's plane, which landed at 3:31 PM. That would give them exactly enough time to have the tarmac hug, deplane, get a police escort, and arrive at the hospital by 4:00 PM, exactly as Frank Turek stated. THE BOTTOM LINE Every time we find a discrepancy between Andrew Kolvet's story and Erika Kirk's story, it turns out Erika is the one lying. She threw Andrew under the bus regarding the 30-06 caliber text, and she is throwing him under the bus now. Erika was not on that 4:40 PM flight. The official story is a fabrication. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL podcast below. 👇

Project Constitution

29,209 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: SCOOTIE🇺🇲 & ❁ダテʚïɞ
5:19

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: SCOOTIE🇺🇲 & ❁ダテʚïɞ

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2,223,438 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Aidan Gomez (Aidan Gomez) is a computer scientist, co-author of the seminal paper ‘Attention Is All You Need,’ and the CEO of Cohere. In this episode, we discussed his upbringing in the cabin his grandfather built in Codrington, a small town North of Brighton, and the values that were instilled in him through his family. We explored his path from Codrington to his undergraduate studies at the University of Toronto, emailing Geoffrey Hinton, and joining Google Brain where he co-wrote the paper on transformers. We discussed how he met his co-founders Ivan Zhang and Nick Frosst, and his insights on what it means to build a meaningful, successful company in Canada. Aidan shares his conviction about what is at stake — for Canada and for the world at large. This is a conversation about family, values, and what it means to live with conviction. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin — filmmaker, entrepreneur, and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. The Other Stuff #29 — Aidan Gomez: Empathy and Conviction — Timestamps 00:00:00 Intro 00:03:10 The Malleability of Toronto 00:11:06 Growing Up in Codrington 00:13:50 The Story of Aidan Gomez’s Family 00:27:23 Introduction to the Internet 00:30:39 Values and Work Ethic 00:35:46 University of Toronto’s AI Scene 00:40:48 Emailing Geoffrey Hinton 00:42:16 Google Brain 00:45:15 Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting 00:49:48 The Beauty of Research 00:54:24 One Model to Rule Them All 00:59:54 Meeting Ivan Zhang and Nick Frosst 01:04:00 The Birth of Cohere 01:06:56 Twitter Influencers and Alex Friedland 01:11:48 Being the CEO 01:12:51 Building for Canada 01:15:01 Three Fundamental Ingredients of Building a Company 01:21:39 Working with the Canadian Government 01:24:39 Reflexivity in Canada 01:36:22 What Is Evil? 01:42:40 The Role of AI in the World
1:46:27

Aidan Gomez (Aidan Gomez) is a computer scientist, co-author of the seminal paper ‘Attention Is All You Need,’ and the CEO of Cohere. In this episode, we discussed his upbringing in the cabin his grandfather built in Codrington, a small town North of Brighton, and the values that were instilled in him through his family. We explored his path from Codrington to his undergraduate studies at the University of Toronto, emailing Geoffrey Hinton, and joining Google Brain where he co-wrote the paper on transformers. We discussed how he met his co-founders Ivan Zhang and Nick Frosst, and his insights on what it means to build a meaningful, successful company in Canada. Aidan shares his conviction about what is at stake — for Canada and for the world at large. This is a conversation about family, values, and what it means to live with conviction. The Other Stuff is hosted by internetVin — filmmaker, entrepreneur, and possibly the most curious man on Earth. Produced by New. The Other Stuff #29 — Aidan Gomez: Empathy and Conviction — Timestamps 00:00:00 Intro 00:03:10 The Malleability of Toronto 00:11:06 Growing Up in Codrington 00:13:50 The Story of Aidan Gomez’s Family 00:27:23 Introduction to the Internet 00:30:39 Values and Work Ethic 00:35:46 University of Toronto’s AI Scene 00:40:48 Emailing Geoffrey Hinton 00:42:16 Google Brain 00:45:15 Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting 00:49:48 The Beauty of Research 00:54:24 One Model to Rule Them All 00:59:54 Meeting Ivan Zhang and Nick Frosst 01:04:00 The Birth of Cohere 01:06:56 Twitter Influencers and Alex Friedland 01:11:48 Being the CEO 01:12:51 Building for Canada 01:15:01 Three Fundamental Ingredients of Building a Company 01:21:39 Working with the Canadian Government 01:24:39 Reflexivity in Canada 01:36:22 What Is Evil? 01:42:40 The Role of AI in the World

The Other Stuff Podcast

45,297 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Scott Jennings has built a reputation for speaking truth to power on CNN, but what stood out to me in this conversation was his honesty, his perspective, and his heart. We filmed this episode over a month ago in Washington DC, and it was the perfect backdrop for a raw and real discussion about politics, faith, and family. We talked about what it takes to sit in the lion’s den night after night, debating politics in front of a national audience, and why authenticity matters more now than ever. Scott opened up about his career path from Kentucky to the Bush White House, to campaign war rooms, and now to CNN, where his voice has become one of the most recognizable conservative perspectives in America. He shared stories about Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, and the lessons he has learned from decades inside politics and media. We also talked about faith, family, and why staying grounded matters when the world is coming at you full speed. Scott Jennings is sharp, candid, and passionate about America’s future, but what I walked away with was a reminder of his integrity and his courage to stand firm in the face of constant pressure. Chapters: 00:03:08:12 – Thoughts on Donald Trump's presidency so far 00:06:32:00 – How has President Trump improved since 2016 00:08:35:01 – How the incident in Butler PA changed everything 00:13:11:23 – Scott Jennings on CNN 00:18:10:19 – How the debates work on CNN 00:20:52:15 – How does Scott Jennings keep his cool while debating 00:24:25:11 – Any strained relationships on set 00:27:18:25 – Scott Jennings' best and worst moments on air 00:31:06:08 – How does Scott Jennings deal with being outnumbered 00:41:12:23 – Scott's career in politics 00:44:39:16 – Mitch McConnell 00:52:11:11 – Political run in Kentucky for Scott 00:54:37:24 – Family 01:00:11:02 – Closing thoughts 01:03:29:11 – The Yellow Ribbon
1:05:46

Scott Jennings has built a reputation for speaking truth to power on CNN, but what stood out to me in this conversation was his honesty, his perspective, and his heart. We filmed this episode over a month ago in Washington DC, and it was the perfect backdrop for a raw and real discussion about politics, faith, and family. We talked about what it takes to sit in the lion’s den night after night, debating politics in front of a national audience, and why authenticity matters more now than ever. Scott opened up about his career path from Kentucky to the Bush White House, to campaign war rooms, and now to CNN, where his voice has become one of the most recognizable conservative perspectives in America. He shared stories about Donald Trump, Mitch McConnell, and the lessons he has learned from decades inside politics and media. We also talked about faith, family, and why staying grounded matters when the world is coming at you full speed. Scott Jennings is sharp, candid, and passionate about America’s future, but what I walked away with was a reminder of his integrity and his courage to stand firm in the face of constant pressure. Chapters: 00:03:08:12 – Thoughts on Donald Trump's presidency so far 00:06:32:00 – How has President Trump improved since 2016 00:08:35:01 – How the incident in Butler PA changed everything 00:13:11:23 – Scott Jennings on CNN 00:18:10:19 – How the debates work on CNN 00:20:52:15 – How does Scott Jennings keep his cool while debating 00:24:25:11 – Any strained relationships on set 00:27:18:25 – Scott Jennings' best and worst moments on air 00:31:06:08 – How does Scott Jennings deal with being outnumbered 00:41:12:23 – Scott's career in politics 00:44:39:16 – Mitch McConnell 00:52:11:11 – Political run in Kentucky for Scott 00:54:37:24 – Family 01:00:11:02 – Closing thoughts 01:03:29:11 – The Yellow Ribbon

Sage Steele

111,471 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Former poker pro is now managing partner at one of crypto’s biggest VC The most important crypto video you must watch in 2025 Huge honor to meet the legend Haseeb Qureshi Haseeb Qureshi ＞|＜ , managing partner at Dragonfly . Had an amazing time discussing the most interesting topics and questions in crypto 🤝 Dragonfly manages $5B+ and has been early to Polygon , ZKsync , Colorado Avalanche , NEAR Protocol , Monad and more 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:18 - How did Haseeb get into poker and become a millionaire? 00:03:26 - Haseeb’s biggest win and biggest loss in poker 00:04:15 - When did Haseeb decide to quit poker? 00:08:56 - Giving away all his money 00:09:44 - His charitable mission 00:10:31 - How Haseeb got into investing 00:12:29 - Working at Metastable Capital and the creation of Dragonfly 00:13:24 - Dragonfly’s first investments 00:15:12 - How funds invest at early stages 00:19:02 - How to become a fund and start investing in projects 00:23:04 - How to collaborate with Dragonfly 00:26:33 - Dragonfly’s best and worst investments 00:28:16 - Thoughts and insights on the crypto market When Haseeb talks, entire ecosystems listens 😉 If you find this insightful, Like, RT & tag the next person we should interview!
31:16

Former poker pro is now managing partner at one of crypto’s biggest VC The most important crypto video you must watch in 2025 Huge honor to meet the legend Haseeb Qureshi Haseeb Qureshi ＞|＜ , managing partner at Dragonfly . Had an amazing time discussing the most interesting topics and questions in crypto 🤝 Dragonfly manages $5B+ and has been early to Polygon , ZKsync , Colorado Avalanche , NEAR Protocol , Monad and more 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:18 - How did Haseeb get into poker and become a millionaire? 00:03:26 - Haseeb’s biggest win and biggest loss in poker 00:04:15 - When did Haseeb decide to quit poker? 00:08:56 - Giving away all his money 00:09:44 - His charitable mission 00:10:31 - How Haseeb got into investing 00:12:29 - Working at Metastable Capital and the creation of Dragonfly 00:13:24 - Dragonfly’s first investments 00:15:12 - How funds invest at early stages 00:19:02 - How to become a fund and start investing in projects 00:23:04 - How to collaborate with Dragonfly 00:26:33 - Dragonfly’s best and worst investments 00:28:16 - Thoughts and insights on the crypto market When Haseeb talks, entire ecosystems listens 😉 If you find this insightful, Like, RT & tag the next person we should interview!

Ruslan Khairullin

26,274 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

WHY THE CHARLIE KIRK OFFICIAL NARRATIVE IS FEDSLOP 🇺🇸 🫡👇🏻 0:05:58 Terryl Farnsworth made me a skeptic, not Candace Owens 0:10:56 Stands on the blood of Charlie to steal the truth 0:13:57 The OTHER SD card 23:57 The OTHER SUS camera guys 26:38 Cooper Brown manhandles witness 31:47 My Terryl Farnsworth reenactment 32:31 "Loved Charlie like a brother" feat. Tucker Carlson 43:31 The Israel angle 57:12 "Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause" 59:05 Blakey Poo 1:02:38 How many undercover cops? 1:05:21 Erika Kirk's "not" boyfriend 1:08:26 "Shabbat shalom" motherfckers 1:09:53 Charlie Kirk's cell phone 1:15:53 Turning Point's AGENT Jack Poso 1:20:50 3 WEEKS after Charlie's gone 👀 1:25:09 The "murd3r" tent Governor Cox 1:26:40 1:31:13 "JD" Vance hosts the Charlie Kirk Show 1:47:38 "ONCE Charlie was assassinated" ~ Erika Kirk 1:50:27 How did the rifle get in the woods? 🤔 2:00:35 The "FBI" collecting "DNA" 2:03:45 Which way did the "shooter" go? 2:10:36 The OTHER RIFLE 2:20:23 The Woodbury Building shooter? 2:29:40 Tyler Robinson has an alibi we We bring receipts 🫡
2:48:25

WHY THE CHARLIE KIRK OFFICIAL NARRATIVE IS FEDSLOP 🇺🇸 🫡👇🏻 0:05:58 Terryl Farnsworth made me a skeptic, not Candace Owens 0:10:56 Stands on the blood of Charlie to steal the truth 0:13:57 The OTHER SD card 23:57 The OTHER SUS camera guys 26:38 Cooper Brown manhandles witness 31:47 My Terryl Farnsworth reenactment 32:31 "Loved Charlie like a brother" feat. Tucker Carlson 43:31 The Israel angle 57:12 "Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause" 59:05 Blakey Poo 1:02:38 How many undercover cops? 1:05:21 Erika Kirk's "not" boyfriend 1:08:26 "Shabbat shalom" motherfckers 1:09:53 Charlie Kirk's cell phone 1:15:53 Turning Point's AGENT Jack Poso 1:20:50 3 WEEKS after Charlie's gone 👀 1:25:09 The "murd3r" tent Governor Cox 1:26:40 1:31:13 "JD" Vance hosts the Charlie Kirk Show 1:47:38 "ONCE Charlie was assassinated" ~ Erika Kirk 1:50:27 How did the rifle get in the woods? 🤔 2:00:35 The "FBI" collecting "DNA" 2:03:45 Which way did the "shooter" go? 2:10:36 The OTHER RIFLE 2:20:23 The Woodbury Building shooter? 2:29:40 Tyler Robinson has an alibi we We bring receipts 🫡

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

16,731 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

My conversation with OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman This is the most detailed first-person account of the 72 hours after Sam Altman was fired. We also go deep on what comes next: the global race to AGI, why ChatGPT stopped showing reasoning, how much of OpenAI's own code is now written by AI ("it's hard to know what percent is not"), and the untold story of how OpenAI actually started in 2015. 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:49 Meeting Sam Altman and Starting OpenAI 00:02:40 Building the Founding Team 00:04:25 DeepMind's Lead Over OpenAI 00:04:54 Changing OpenAI to a For-Profit Model 00:06:05 Breakthrough Moments at OpenAI 00:08:22 What Dota 2 Meant for OpenAI 00:10:04 Reasoning Versus Prediction 00:11:59 Tensions Grow at OpenAI 00:15:44 Sam Altman's Firing 00:17:49 Greg Quits OpenAI 00:19:56 Sam Explores Deal with Microsoft's Satya 00:20:28 Petition for Altman's Return 00:23:43 Ilya Sutskever Leaves OpenAI 00:24:59 Lessons Learned after Sam Ousting 00:28:22 The Thing Ilya Said that Greg Can't Forget 00:32:22 Is AI Going Parabolic? 00:33:24 How Much of OpenAI's Code is Written by AI? 00:36:21 Do AI Chatbots Tell Us What We Want to Hear? 00:38:06 The Global AI Race to Reach AGI 00:38:40 What Happens if US Doesn't Reach AGI First? 00:39:49 Are Countries Stealing AI Advancements? 00:40:38 Why ChatGPT No Longer Shows Reasoning 00:41:47 The Finite Constraints of Compute 00:43:38 On Investing Early in Data Centers 00:46:31 The Future of Data Center Specialization 00:47:52 How to Decide Whose Queries to Serve 00:49:08 OpenAI on Consumer vs Enterprise Models 00:53:05 Data Centers in Space? 01:00:56 What Should AI Regulation Look Like? 01:04:33 The Future of AI-Powered Entrepreneurship 01:04:44 AI and Job Loss 01:07:15 The Skills Young People Should Invest In 01:11:30 What Does Success Look Like For You? Full episode on X below. Also find it on: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple:
1:11:41

My conversation with OpenAI co-founder Greg Brockman This is the most detailed first-person account of the 72 hours after Sam Altman was fired. We also go deep on what comes next: the global race to AGI, why ChatGPT stopped showing reasoning, how much of OpenAI's own code is now written by AI ("it's hard to know what percent is not"), and the untold story of how OpenAI actually started in 2015. 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:49 Meeting Sam Altman and Starting OpenAI 00:02:40 Building the Founding Team 00:04:25 DeepMind's Lead Over OpenAI 00:04:54 Changing OpenAI to a For-Profit Model 00:06:05 Breakthrough Moments at OpenAI 00:08:22 What Dota 2 Meant for OpenAI 00:10:04 Reasoning Versus Prediction 00:11:59 Tensions Grow at OpenAI 00:15:44 Sam Altman's Firing 00:17:49 Greg Quits OpenAI 00:19:56 Sam Explores Deal with Microsoft's Satya 00:20:28 Petition for Altman's Return 00:23:43 Ilya Sutskever Leaves OpenAI 00:24:59 Lessons Learned after Sam Ousting 00:28:22 The Thing Ilya Said that Greg Can't Forget 00:32:22 Is AI Going Parabolic? 00:33:24 How Much of OpenAI's Code is Written by AI? 00:36:21 Do AI Chatbots Tell Us What We Want to Hear? 00:38:06 The Global AI Race to Reach AGI 00:38:40 What Happens if US Doesn't Reach AGI First? 00:39:49 Are Countries Stealing AI Advancements? 00:40:38 Why ChatGPT No Longer Shows Reasoning 00:41:47 The Finite Constraints of Compute 00:43:38 On Investing Early in Data Centers 00:46:31 The Future of Data Center Specialization 00:47:52 How to Decide Whose Queries to Serve 00:49:08 OpenAI on Consumer vs Enterprise Models 00:53:05 Data Centers in Space? 01:00:56 What Should AI Regulation Look Like? 01:04:33 The Future of AI-Powered Entrepreneurship 01:04:44 AI and Job Loss 01:07:15 The Skills Young People Should Invest In 01:11:30 What Does Success Look Like For You? Full episode on X below. Also find it on: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple:

Shane Parrish

450,952 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

We don't know what most microbial genes do. Can genomic language models help? there's only one way to find out! this is a 1 hour and 42 minute interview with an MIT professor (the famous Yunha Hwang) chatting about these questions, her work in solving them at Tatta Bio, and more. zoomer captions are back too Links in reply! Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Clips + sponsor roll from the wonderful LatchBio 00:02:07 – Introduction 00:02:23 – Why do microbial genomes matter 00:04:07 – Deep learning acceptance in metagenomics 00:05:25 – The case for genomic “context” over sequence matching 00:06:43 – OMG: the only ML-ready metagenomic dataset 00:09:27 – gLM2: A multimodal genomic language model 00:11:06 – What do you do with the output of genomic language models? 00:17:41 – How will OMG evolve? 00:20:26 – Why train on only microbial genomes, as opposed to all genomes? 00:22:58 – Do we need more sequences or more annotations? 00:23:54 – Is there a conserved microbial genome ‘language’? 00:28:11 – What non-obvious things can this genomic language model tell you? 00:33:08 – Semantic deduplication and evaluation 00:37:33 – How does benchmarking work for these types of models? 00:41:31 – Gaia: A genomic search engine 00:44:18 – Even ‘well-studied’ genomes are mostly unannotated 00:50:51 – Using agents on Gaia 00:54:53 – Will genomic language models reshape the tree of life? 00:59:18 – Current limitations of genomic language models 01:08:54 – Directed evolution as training data 01:12:35 – What is Tatta Bio? 01:19:02 – Building Google for genomic sequences (SeqHub) 01:25:46 – How to create communities around scientific OSS 01:29:06 – What’s the purpose in the centralization of the software? 01:35:37 – How will the way science is done change in 10 years?
1:42:41

We don't know what most microbial genes do. Can genomic language models help? there's only one way to find out! this is a 1 hour and 42 minute interview with an MIT professor (the famous Yunha Hwang) chatting about these questions, her work in solving them at Tatta Bio, and more. zoomer captions are back too Links in reply! Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Clips + sponsor roll from the wonderful LatchBio 00:02:07 – Introduction 00:02:23 – Why do microbial genomes matter 00:04:07 – Deep learning acceptance in metagenomics 00:05:25 – The case for genomic “context” over sequence matching 00:06:43 – OMG: the only ML-ready metagenomic dataset 00:09:27 – gLM2: A multimodal genomic language model 00:11:06 – What do you do with the output of genomic language models? 00:17:41 – How will OMG evolve? 00:20:26 – Why train on only microbial genomes, as opposed to all genomes? 00:22:58 – Do we need more sequences or more annotations? 00:23:54 – Is there a conserved microbial genome ‘language’? 00:28:11 – What non-obvious things can this genomic language model tell you? 00:33:08 – Semantic deduplication and evaluation 00:37:33 – How does benchmarking work for these types of models? 00:41:31 – Gaia: A genomic search engine 00:44:18 – Even ‘well-studied’ genomes are mostly unannotated 00:50:51 – Using agents on Gaia 00:54:53 – Will genomic language models reshape the tree of life? 00:59:18 – Current limitations of genomic language models 01:08:54 – Directed evolution as training data 01:12:35 – What is Tatta Bio? 01:19:02 – Building Google for genomic sequences (SeqHub) 01:25:46 – How to create communities around scientific OSS 01:29:06 – What’s the purpose in the centralization of the software? 01:35:37 – How will the way science is done change in 10 years?

owl

44,279 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

TERRYL FARNSWORTH OF TPUSA NEEDS TO BE HAULED IN FOR QUESTIONING LIKE YESTERDAY! ‼‼️ Once you understand the logistics of Terryl’s behavior in the final minutes of Charlies life and just after he was killed, you understand that HE HAD TO KNOW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. Terryl positioned himself in a place that required climbing to get a good vantage point. He did this BEFORE Charlie was killed. He then recorded a video from his vantage point which began recording BEFORE anyone else had made it outside yet. After Charlie is shot, people start to panic and run for their lives like in any tragedy. Charlies' security detail does their scramble to hide evidence and tie up loose ends before they manage to carry Charlie out like a sack of potatoes with no neck support or no real concern for his well-being. TERRYL IS IN PLACE BEFORE ANYONE MAKES IT TO THE EXIT. Terryl then records a VERY STRANGE video where he obviously feigns emotion about what just happened but focuses the camera on himself instead of the scene. He delivers his obvious scripted lines and says "they killed charlie" before saying "god help him" Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 has done unbelievable work on this case bringing light to what was kept in the dark. I strongly recommend you follow him and look at ALL of his amazing work. He lays out the logistics of the vantage point after he visited UVU in the video below. THERE IS NO WAY TO EXPLAIN HOW TERRYL KNEW TO GET INTO THAT SPOT BEFORE CHARLIE WAS HIT WITHOUT KNOWING ABOUT THE GREATER PLOT. IF TERRYL KNEW, THEN YOU KNOW THE ENTIRE SECURITY TEAM KNEW. THAT IS WHAT WE CALL A CONSPIRACY.
2:59

TERRYL FARNSWORTH OF TPUSA NEEDS TO BE HAULED IN FOR QUESTIONING LIKE YESTERDAY! ‼‼️ Once you understand the logistics of Terryl’s behavior in the final minutes of Charlies life and just after he was killed, you understand that HE HAD TO KNOW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN. Terryl positioned himself in a place that required climbing to get a good vantage point. He did this BEFORE Charlie was killed. He then recorded a video from his vantage point which began recording BEFORE anyone else had made it outside yet. After Charlie is shot, people start to panic and run for their lives like in any tragedy. Charlies' security detail does their scramble to hide evidence and tie up loose ends before they manage to carry Charlie out like a sack of potatoes with no neck support or no real concern for his well-being. TERRYL IS IN PLACE BEFORE ANYONE MAKES IT TO THE EXIT. Terryl then records a VERY STRANGE video where he obviously feigns emotion about what just happened but focuses the camera on himself instead of the scene. He delivers his obvious scripted lines and says "they killed charlie" before saying "god help him" Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 has done unbelievable work on this case bringing light to what was kept in the dark. I strongly recommend you follow him and look at ALL of his amazing work. He lays out the logistics of the vantage point after he visited UVU in the video below. THERE IS NO WAY TO EXPLAIN HOW TERRYL KNEW TO GET INTO THAT SPOT BEFORE CHARLIE WAS HIT WITHOUT KNOWING ABOUT THE GREATER PLOT. IF TERRYL KNEW, THEN YOU KNOW THE ENTIRE SECURITY TEAM KNEW. THAT IS WHAT WE CALL A CONSPIRACY.

AmericaOnlyBro

162,013 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

.Jerry Tworek is an AI legend. He came to OpenAI from the world of finance and spent years contributing to some of the company's most important projects. He played a major role in ushering in the era of reasoning and, well, he just left OpenAI. In this Core Memory pod, Kylie Robison and I bring you the exclusive not-so-formal exit interview with Jerry. He explains his dissatisfaction with the company's current research direction and his fears for the field overall. He goes into spots where OpenAI lost its way and Google and Anthropic thrived. And he talks about what he's chasing next. It's a banger. The Core Memory podcast is on all major platforms and on our YouTube channel. This podcast is sponsored by Brex , the intelligent finance platform built to help companies spend smarter and move faster. And it's brought to you by the VC gurus E1 Ventures 🇺🇸 Timestamps 00:00:00 Intro 00:03:37 Jerry Tworek Joins the Pod 00:05:34 Reflecting on Seven Years at OpenAI 00:09:08 Why Jerry Left: 00:12:28 Beyond Pre-Training 00:16:19 The "Sad" Homogeneity of Current AI Labs 00:23:35 The Mavericks: Carmack, Ilya, and LeCun 00:26:32 Training AI on Video Games 00:32:14 Two Big Bets 00:34:32 Updating AGI Timelines 00:37:16 Q-Star 00:41:10 The Coup 00:43:29 Is the Hype Justified? 00:49:23 The Polish Mafia 00:53:15 Google's Comeback and OpenAI's Fumble 00:59:27 Why Anthropic is Impressive 01:03:01 Jerry's Next Chapter 01:11:56 Is AI Research Star-Driven? 01:14:32 Meditation & Conclusion
1:16:29

.Jerry Tworek is an AI legend. He came to OpenAI from the world of finance and spent years contributing to some of the company's most important projects. He played a major role in ushering in the era of reasoning and, well, he just left OpenAI. In this Core Memory pod, Kylie Robison and I bring you the exclusive not-so-formal exit interview with Jerry. He explains his dissatisfaction with the company's current research direction and his fears for the field overall. He goes into spots where OpenAI lost its way and Google and Anthropic thrived. And he talks about what he's chasing next. It's a banger. The Core Memory podcast is on all major platforms and on our YouTube channel. This podcast is sponsored by Brex , the intelligent finance platform built to help companies spend smarter and move faster. And it's brought to you by the VC gurus E1 Ventures 🇺🇸 Timestamps 00:00:00 Intro 00:03:37 Jerry Tworek Joins the Pod 00:05:34 Reflecting on Seven Years at OpenAI 00:09:08 Why Jerry Left: 00:12:28 Beyond Pre-Training 00:16:19 The "Sad" Homogeneity of Current AI Labs 00:23:35 The Mavericks: Carmack, Ilya, and LeCun 00:26:32 Training AI on Video Games 00:32:14 Two Big Bets 00:34:32 Updating AGI Timelines 00:37:16 Q-Star 00:41:10 The Coup 00:43:29 Is the Hype Justified? 00:49:23 The Polish Mafia 00:53:15 Google's Comeback and OpenAI's Fumble 00:59:27 Why Anthropic is Impressive 01:03:01 Jerry's Next Chapter 01:11:56 Is AI Research Star-Driven? 01:14:32 Meditation & Conclusion

Ashlee Vance

11,701 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.
1:10:36

Ludvig Åberg breaks down his strategy for every hole at Augusta National in TGJ Podcast #207: 00:01:11 But first, some LEGO talk. 00:10:52 No. 1: The hardest pin on the course. 00:14:42 No. 2: Left is dead, so you have to love the bunker. 00:18:36 No. 3: "I've got trust issues with banking it into the hill." 00:22:49 No. 4: The most visually deceptive hole at Augusta. 00:25:02 No. 5: "It's long and has one of the hardest greens." 00:27:07 No. 6: Hit it high to fit the swirling wind 00:29:46 No. 7: The simplest hole, but only if you hit the fairway. 00:31:22 No. 8: More uphill than you think. 00:33:31 No. 9: "It sets up for a low cut or low skank." 00:39:04 No. 10: The left side of the fairway is the place to be. 00:41:56 No. 11: "If I could ever take back one shot, it'd be here." 00:43:50 No. 12: Limit the external factors as much as you can. 00:48:23 No. 13: Ludvig is a reformed doubter of the pull of Rae's Creek. 00:52:15 No. 14: It's birdie or bust. 00:54:20 No. 15: The layup debate in the caddie room is real. 00:57:56 No. 16: "The highlights make the left pin look automatic. It’s not." 00:59:26 No. 17: Rae's Creek has some mythical pull up here too. 01:01:15 No. 18: Rory's winning putt was harder than you think. 01:07:57 The last book Ludvig read is exactly what you'd expect.

The Golfer's Journal

157,909 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: The SHABBAT SHALOM Psyop Fails — Blake Neff Finally Breaks His SILENCE (And It's HILARIOUS) Candace Owens just absolutely lit up TPUSA’s Blake Neff on The Bride of Charlie, and it is a masterclass in exposing a manufactured PR narrative.🔥 For months, we have been asking Turning Point USA leadership serious, hard-hitting questions to get to the bottom of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. And for months, Blake Neff has been dead silent. What Blake Has Completely IGNORED: Why TPUSA refused to release any security footage, medical reports, or autopsy results from the day Charlie Kirk died at UVU? Why did the organization immediately block and threaten legal action against anyone asking for transparency? Why was Blake Neff even with Charlie that day at UVU since Blake historically does does NOT attend college campus events? The Missing Donor Millions: $4–10 million+ in unexplained "printing" and vendor payments to shell companies seems to be accounted for, So where did that donor money actually go, and why has TPUSA never addressed or refuted these specific financial red flags? Why did TPUSA immediately install Erika Kirk as CEO within days of Charlie's death—before any independent investigation or even a public explanation? Why has TPUSA continued to use Charlie's name and likeness on "The Charlie Kirk Show" despite fan demands to stop exploiting his death for revenue? Why is TPUSA now using the "Ghost" of Charlie to push pro-war narratives that directly contradict his final public positions? These seven questions are the most repeated, most damaging, and the ones TPUSA and Blake Neff have pointedly refused to answer for over five months. If asked in a public setting, they would be impossible to dodge without looking even more guilty. THE FINAL STRAW: What Finally Triggered Blake to Speak Out though was Candace making fun of Erika Kirk saying "Shabbat Shalom."😂 You literally cannot make this up. Blake Neff forwarded all of the serious investigative questions about fraud and military intelligence to a snippy lawyer, but he had to rush to X to fiercely defend the narrative that Charlie's final legacy was a book about the Sabbath. Candace called it exactly what it is: a coordinated Psy-Op. The timing is undeniable. Within 48 hours of Charlie's murder, Bibi Netanyahu was releasing statements to remind the world how much Charlie loved Israel. Immediately, Erika and TPUSA began aggressively pushing this "Shabbat Shalom" book to rebrand Charlie's legacy the second he was gone. As Candace hilariously pointed out: She was the one who originally told Charlie to turn his phone off on Saturdays years ago. But Blake and Erika desperately want the public to believe Charlie was suddenly operating like an Orthodox rabbi right before his assassination. Candace: "Charlie loved dreidel dreidel dreidel... He loved latkes... Shabbat Shalom, Daddy's home, throw away the phone." Watching Candace ruthlessly mock the absolute absurdity of TPUSA's priorities was incredible. The Psy-Op failed. The America First movement sees right through it. If the only thing TPUSA leadership will publicly defend is a fabricated PR narrative while ignoring massive fraud, military ties, and questions about their founder's death... we have all the answers we need. FOLLOW Candace Owens and go watch the latest FULL explosive episode of her critically acclaimed Erika Kirk docuseries "The Bride Of Charlie" linked down below.👇
3:54

🚨BREAKING: The SHABBAT SHALOM Psyop Fails — Blake Neff Finally Breaks His SILENCE (And It's HILARIOUS) Candace Owens just absolutely lit up TPUSA’s Blake Neff on The Bride of Charlie, and it is a masterclass in exposing a manufactured PR narrative.🔥 For months, we have been asking Turning Point USA leadership serious, hard-hitting questions to get to the bottom of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. And for months, Blake Neff has been dead silent. What Blake Has Completely IGNORED: Why TPUSA refused to release any security footage, medical reports, or autopsy results from the day Charlie Kirk died at UVU? Why did the organization immediately block and threaten legal action against anyone asking for transparency? Why was Blake Neff even with Charlie that day at UVU since Blake historically does does NOT attend college campus events? The Missing Donor Millions: $4–10 million+ in unexplained "printing" and vendor payments to shell companies seems to be accounted for, So where did that donor money actually go, and why has TPUSA never addressed or refuted these specific financial red flags? Why did TPUSA immediately install Erika Kirk as CEO within days of Charlie's death—before any independent investigation or even a public explanation? Why has TPUSA continued to use Charlie's name and likeness on "The Charlie Kirk Show" despite fan demands to stop exploiting his death for revenue? Why is TPUSA now using the "Ghost" of Charlie to push pro-war narratives that directly contradict his final public positions? These seven questions are the most repeated, most damaging, and the ones TPUSA and Blake Neff have pointedly refused to answer for over five months. If asked in a public setting, they would be impossible to dodge without looking even more guilty. THE FINAL STRAW: What Finally Triggered Blake to Speak Out though was Candace making fun of Erika Kirk saying "Shabbat Shalom."😂 You literally cannot make this up. Blake Neff forwarded all of the serious investigative questions about fraud and military intelligence to a snippy lawyer, but he had to rush to X to fiercely defend the narrative that Charlie's final legacy was a book about the Sabbath. Candace called it exactly what it is: a coordinated Psy-Op. The timing is undeniable. Within 48 hours of Charlie's murder, Bibi Netanyahu was releasing statements to remind the world how much Charlie loved Israel. Immediately, Erika and TPUSA began aggressively pushing this "Shabbat Shalom" book to rebrand Charlie's legacy the second he was gone. As Candace hilariously pointed out: She was the one who originally told Charlie to turn his phone off on Saturdays years ago. But Blake and Erika desperately want the public to believe Charlie was suddenly operating like an Orthodox rabbi right before his assassination. Candace: "Charlie loved dreidel dreidel dreidel... He loved latkes... Shabbat Shalom, Daddy's home, throw away the phone." Watching Candace ruthlessly mock the absolute absurdity of TPUSA's priorities was incredible. The Psy-Op failed. The America First movement sees right through it. If the only thing TPUSA leadership will publicly defend is a fabricated PR narrative while ignoring massive fraud, military ties, and questions about their founder's death... we have all the answers we need. FOLLOW Candace Owens and go watch the latest FULL explosive episode of her critically acclaimed Erika Kirk docuseries "The Bride Of Charlie" linked down below.👇

Project Constitution

68,798 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

CLOSER LOOK: The Terryl Farnsworth segment of the Brian Harpole/Shawn Ryan discussion is full of so much alleged psychological massaging, you simply have to watch it again. Here's what I noticed, and I'm interested to know what you all notice that I may have missed: STRATEGIC OMISSION: They covered Terryl Farnsworth but completely avoided any discussion of him declaring Charlie dead in the secret video recording--which is THE PRIMARY BOMBSHELL in Farnsworth's video. MISQUOTING: They actually get Terryl's quote wrong. Farnsworth said "They shot Charlie," not "Charlie's been shot." Small, but oh-so-BIG difference. MISDIRECTION: Why did they frame his secret selfie as a kind of TikTok "clout posting" when the video wasn't streamed or posted? It's a false framing that implants an incorrect characterization into the minds of the watchers. It feels like an effort to absolve Terryl of something rather than a quest for truth. NEW REVELATIONS: Terryl Farnsworth doesn't actually work for TPUSA as everyone has assumed, rather he worked for a company called Visual Impulse (VI) that TPUSA contracted. Why did TPUSA let that false assumption stand for so long? MARGINALIZATION: They never uttered Terryl Farnsworth's name, and to listen to Brian, you'd think he barely knew who Terryl was--odd since Terryl had security clearance to be inside the "no-go" zone. Is Brian accountable for anything under his security purview?! STRAW MAN: People didn't just object to Farnsworth because he might have deleted or destroyed the footage, which is how Brian & Shawn framed it, they objected to him illegally tampering with the crime scene and possibly destroying critical forensic evidence like the camera placement. SELF-ABSOLUTION: "It's not for me to understand..." Gotcha, Brian. The stairs, the Sorenson Center, the Losee Center, the drones, the rooftops--people inside the perimeter--none of that's your job. Above your pay grade? SMH! Remember: Candace Owens reported that Terryl Farnsworth doesn't normally handle these kinds of events, and that he admitted to her "they were trying something new that day." (Indeed, Farnsworth wasn't at the follow-up Utah event on September 30th) Tell me what you see here, and leave a like and a retweet for the algo, please, so that we can crowdsource this. I feel like there is more going on here. Leave no stone unturned. (BTW: I ascribe no guilt to anyone here, I'm just looking at all the details and seeing where they lead)
2:14

CLOSER LOOK: The Terryl Farnsworth segment of the Brian Harpole/Shawn Ryan discussion is full of so much alleged psychological massaging, you simply have to watch it again. Here's what I noticed, and I'm interested to know what you all notice that I may have missed: STRATEGIC OMISSION: They covered Terryl Farnsworth but completely avoided any discussion of him declaring Charlie dead in the secret video recording--which is THE PRIMARY BOMBSHELL in Farnsworth's video. MISQUOTING: They actually get Terryl's quote wrong. Farnsworth said "They shot Charlie," not "Charlie's been shot." Small, but oh-so-BIG difference. MISDIRECTION: Why did they frame his secret selfie as a kind of TikTok "clout posting" when the video wasn't streamed or posted? It's a false framing that implants an incorrect characterization into the minds of the watchers. It feels like an effort to absolve Terryl of something rather than a quest for truth. NEW REVELATIONS: Terryl Farnsworth doesn't actually work for TPUSA as everyone has assumed, rather he worked for a company called Visual Impulse (VI) that TPUSA contracted. Why did TPUSA let that false assumption stand for so long? MARGINALIZATION: They never uttered Terryl Farnsworth's name, and to listen to Brian, you'd think he barely knew who Terryl was--odd since Terryl had security clearance to be inside the "no-go" zone. Is Brian accountable for anything under his security purview?! STRAW MAN: People didn't just object to Farnsworth because he might have deleted or destroyed the footage, which is how Brian & Shawn framed it, they objected to him illegally tampering with the crime scene and possibly destroying critical forensic evidence like the camera placement. SELF-ABSOLUTION: "It's not for me to understand..." Gotcha, Brian. The stairs, the Sorenson Center, the Losee Center, the drones, the rooftops--people inside the perimeter--none of that's your job. Above your pay grade? SMH! Remember: Candace Owens reported that Terryl Farnsworth doesn't normally handle these kinds of events, and that he admitted to her "they were trying something new that day." (Indeed, Farnsworth wasn't at the follow-up Utah event on September 30th) Tell me what you see here, and leave a like and a retweet for the algo, please, so that we can crowdsource this. I feel like there is more going on here. Leave no stone unturned. (BTW: I ascribe no guilt to anyone here, I'm just looking at all the details and seeing where they lead)

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

79,366 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten