Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Condoleezza Rice thought that the State Department needed reform, that USAID had mission creep, and that the concept of aid needed to be revisited since countries were not improving after decades of giving them our tax dollars. USAID went from a righteous mission of trying to help countries in...

listen_2learn's profile picture

The Researcher

64,858 subscribers

502,654 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

For decades, USAID was using American tax dollars as a slush fund to push radical agendas and destabilize countries around the world. How is this not one of the biggest scams in U.S. history? 😡🔥 #ShutItDown
0:31

For decades, USAID was using American tax dollars as a slush fund to push radical agendas and destabilize countries around the world. How is this not one of the biggest scams in U.S. history? 😡🔥 #ShutItDown

Lewis Miles

22,133 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨MIKE BENZ: "There is no aid in USAID. It's not an aid organization. USAID stands for US Agency for International Development. What it's developing is all the activist organizations in foreign countries that the state department is building to gain influence. USAID was created to be a central hub that organized all the different foreign clandestine operations. It has a $50B budget. The entire intelligence community is only $72B. It's more than the CIA and the State Department. Its a switch player to assist the pentagon, the state department, and the intelligence community."
1:43

🚨MIKE BENZ: "There is no aid in USAID. It's not an aid organization. USAID stands for US Agency for International Development. What it's developing is all the activist organizations in foreign countries that the state department is building to gain influence. USAID was created to be a central hub that organized all the different foreign clandestine operations. It has a $50B budget. The entire intelligence community is only $72B. It's more than the CIA and the State Department. Its a switch player to assist the pentagon, the state department, and the intelligence community."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,389,303 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Secretary of State Marco Rubio just absolutely RIPPED the deep state slush fund known as USAID: "I am the acting director of USAID." "My frustrations with USAID goes back to my time in Congress. It's a completely unresponsive agency, it's supposed to respond to policy directives of the state department and it refuses to do so." "Every dollar we spend will be aligned with the national interest of the United States. USAID has a history of ignoring that and deciding that they're a global charity. These are not donor dollars, these are taxpayer dollars." 🔥🔥
2:17

Secretary of State Marco Rubio just absolutely RIPPED the deep state slush fund known as USAID: "I am the acting director of USAID." "My frustrations with USAID goes back to my time in Congress. It's a completely unresponsive agency, it's supposed to respond to policy directives of the state department and it refuses to do so." "Every dollar we spend will be aligned with the national interest of the United States. USAID has a history of ignoring that and deciding that they're a global charity. These are not donor dollars, these are taxpayer dollars." 🔥🔥

Charlie Kirk

3,443,726 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk exposes that “USAID funding was used for TERRORISM” And people like Ro Khanna SMEAR him for helping destroy USAID! Even MARCO RUBIO CONFIRMED: USAID operated as a de facto independent entity that UNDERMINED the U.S. abroad 🤯 "It operated almost as an independent State Department, and often times USAID was operating in contravention and contradiction of what the Embassy was trying to accomplish in the host country!" "And one of the complaints you would get from many developing countries is that they would get flooded with NGOs that were picked for them, these NGOs would then operate in the country without even coordinating with the government, doing whatever they wanted and pursuing what they wanted." "In some cases, it extended well beyond food and medicine, it extended to political interference and all sorts of other activities in these countries that were undermining the national interest and the credibility of the United States." Elon Musk probably SAVED lives by gutting USAID. The opposite of what they claim!
1:19

🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk exposes that “USAID funding was used for TERRORISM” And people like Ro Khanna SMEAR him for helping destroy USAID! Even MARCO RUBIO CONFIRMED: USAID operated as a de facto independent entity that UNDERMINED the U.S. abroad 🤯 "It operated almost as an independent State Department, and often times USAID was operating in contravention and contradiction of what the Embassy was trying to accomplish in the host country!" "And one of the complaints you would get from many developing countries is that they would get flooded with NGOs that were picked for them, these NGOs would then operate in the country without even coordinating with the government, doing whatever they wanted and pursuing what they wanted." "In some cases, it extended well beyond food and medicine, it extended to political interference and all sorts of other activities in these countries that were undermining the national interest and the credibility of the United States." Elon Musk probably SAVED lives by gutting USAID. The opposite of what they claim!

Eric Daugherty

48,377 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Hungarian Government releasing a documentary on how Democrats funneled money through USAID to George Soros “to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders and war stances” “The Hungarian government has announced that they will be releasing a documentary exposing the USAID scandal. The movie will focus on revealing how USAID funneled millions of dollars into ideological movements in their country. They claim that political organizations and liberal media, which claim to be independent, received money through USAID to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders and war stances. Orban's government says USAID is working with George Soros's Open Society Foundations in the plot.”
0:33

Hungarian Government releasing a documentary on how Democrats funneled money through USAID to George Soros “to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders and war stances” “The Hungarian government has announced that they will be releasing a documentary exposing the USAID scandal. The movie will focus on revealing how USAID funneled millions of dollars into ideological movements in their country. They claim that political organizations and liberal media, which claim to be independent, received money through USAID to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders and war stances. Orban's government says USAID is working with George Soros's Open Society Foundations in the plot.”

Wall Street Apes

886,291 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here it is: USAID not only facilitated the overthrow of foreign countries, but also operations here at home: Barack Obama covertly funneled $1.2 billion through USAID that was supposedly designated for Pakistan as “humanitarian aid,” but instead laundered it through the Cayman Islands to help overthrow the Cuban government. Similarly, USAID funneled $27 million to the “rent-a-riots” terrorist group Black Lives Matter through the Tides Foundation—a George Soros–backed terrorist organization—which helped overthrow the United States government leading up to the 2020 presidential election. Here is: Mike Benz discussing how Obama funded a social media platform—a Twitter clone—that was used to push propaganda in Cuba, inspire protests, and then leverage that funding to train and deploy “rent-a-riots” for protests aimed at overthrowing governments. Mike Benz: “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. USAID pumped $1.2 billion in, and we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, learn how to use hashtags, and learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knew where to go, which streets to show up on, and what slogans to use in order to create the pro-democracy predicate for it. You’re using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You’re saying it’s earmarked for Pakistani aid. But the money was never sent to Pakistan—it was sent to the Cayman Islands to fund this whole operation.”
7:02

Here it is: USAID not only facilitated the overthrow of foreign countries, but also operations here at home: Barack Obama covertly funneled $1.2 billion through USAID that was supposedly designated for Pakistan as “humanitarian aid,” but instead laundered it through the Cayman Islands to help overthrow the Cuban government. Similarly, USAID funneled $27 million to the “rent-a-riots” terrorist group Black Lives Matter through the Tides Foundation—a George Soros–backed terrorist organization—which helped overthrow the United States government leading up to the 2020 presidential election. Here is: Mike Benz discussing how Obama funded a social media platform—a Twitter clone—that was used to push propaganda in Cuba, inspire protests, and then leverage that funding to train and deploy “rent-a-riots” for protests aimed at overthrowing governments. Mike Benz: “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. USAID pumped $1.2 billion in, and we sponsored these activist groups and these civil society organizations to learn how to use Facebook, learn how to use Twitter, learn how to use hashtags, and learn how to coordinate street protests so that everyone knew where to go, which streets to show up on, and what slogans to use in order to create the pro-democracy predicate for it. You’re using Cayman Islands bank accounts. You’re saying it’s earmarked for Pakistani aid. But the money was never sent to Pakistan—it was sent to the Cayman Islands to fund this whole operation.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

585,659 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Here is: Secretary of State Marco Rubio: Drops a bombshell 🔥🔥 USAID was just a money laundering machine for NGOs—it committed fraud and deliberately undermined and contradicted U.S. State Department directives and host countries, including interfering in elections—thus toppling foreign governments. Secretary of State: “It operated almost as an independent State Department, and oftentimes USAID was operating in contravention and contradiction of what the Embassy was trying to accomplish in the host country!” “And one of the complaints you would get from many developing countries is that they would get flooded with NGOs that were picked for them. These NGOs would then operate in the country without even coordinating with the government, doing whatever they wanted and pursuing what they wanted.” “In some cases, it extended well beyond food and medicine. It extended to political interference and all sorts of other activities in these countries that were undermining the national interest and the credibility of the United States.”
1:19

Here is: Secretary of State Marco Rubio: Drops a bombshell 🔥🔥 USAID was just a money laundering machine for NGOs—it committed fraud and deliberately undermined and contradicted U.S. State Department directives and host countries, including interfering in elections—thus toppling foreign governments. Secretary of State: “It operated almost as an independent State Department, and oftentimes USAID was operating in contravention and contradiction of what the Embassy was trying to accomplish in the host country!” “And one of the complaints you would get from many developing countries is that they would get flooded with NGOs that were picked for them. These NGOs would then operate in the country without even coordinating with the government, doing whatever they wanted and pursuing what they wanted.” “In some cases, it extended well beyond food and medicine. It extended to political interference and all sorts of other activities in these countries that were undermining the national interest and the credibility of the United States.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

20,915 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

It was ALL a lie. The real reason USAID was in Africa Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao: “They're using that open access, sounding humanitarian, to constantly destabilize governments” “We need to understand the real reason why USAID is in Africa, and not just USAID, but other NGOs They are coming in claiming that they're introducing grassroots initiatives that are going to help the people, and so they use that as a way to go into the most remote parts of Africa. When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good, but they're actually wolf in sheep's clothing.” “The American taxpayer needs to know the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID. A fraction is making it to the people” “They're using that open access sounding humanitarian to constantly destabilize governments. I can tell you right now, the majority of African leaders, and not just African leaders, but leaders in the developing world are celebrating the exit of USAID. If you think about it, their sole purpose, for example, filling in the gaps in healthcare and education, where is the change? Show me one country that USAID was in and education improved. Show me what country where USAID was in and healthcare improved?” They laundered our money.
1:13

It was ALL a lie. The real reason USAID was in Africa Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao: “They're using that open access, sounding humanitarian, to constantly destabilize governments” “We need to understand the real reason why USAID is in Africa, and not just USAID, but other NGOs They are coming in claiming that they're introducing grassroots initiatives that are going to help the people, and so they use that as a way to go into the most remote parts of Africa. When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good, but they're actually wolf in sheep's clothing.” “The American taxpayer needs to know the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID. A fraction is making it to the people” “They're using that open access sounding humanitarian to constantly destabilize governments. I can tell you right now, the majority of African leaders, and not just African leaders, but leaders in the developing world are celebrating the exit of USAID. If you think about it, their sole purpose, for example, filling in the gaps in healthcare and education, where is the change? Show me one country that USAID was in and education improved. Show me what country where USAID was in and healthcare improved?” They laundered our money.

Wall Street Apes

25,472,512 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Donald Trump is causing a constitutional crisis by eliminating the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and giving Elon Musk access to confidential Treasury records, say the media and Democrats. The American people didn’t elect Musk, said Democrats in a rally on Friday, where some House members were disallowed from entering the Department of Education. A judge on Friday restricted Musk’s team’s access to Treasury records. Trump yesterday, in an interview with Bret Baier of Fox, said that Musk would soon begin seeking efficiencies in the Departments of Defense and Education. As such, what’s happening is a “constitutional crisis,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin on Meet the Press, where he threatened a class action lawsuit on behalf of the American people. But there is no constitutional crisis. The American people elected Trump as president, and he, not Congress, exercises authority over all executive branch agencies, including USAID, the Department of Education, the Department of Defense, and the Treasury Department. Trump has clear Constitutional authority to audit the finances overseen by the Treasury and every other agency, and that includes assigning that audit to whoever he chooses. The Constitution grants Congress oversight duties but those powers do not include members being allowed to enter any executive branch building whenever they please. None of that means that the administration should ignore Congress, court orders, or the potential public health problems that could be created by the closure of USAID and freezing of its funds. Said the surgeon, New Yorker author, and former USAID official, Atul Gawande, on X, “20M people with HIV, including 500,000 children, have been cut off from access to medicines keeping them alive. Global HIV transmission, resistance, and deaths will now increase, endangering all.” Gawande added that, as a result of the loss of USAID, the US has lost critical bird flu surveillance, sacrificed humanitarian aid in Gaza, and halted the resettlement of former Islamic State combatants. USAID may have been doing and funding projects that were worthwhile. And it may be that Congress will need to pass legislation to continue those projects through the State Department. But it’s emotional blackmail to suggest the USAID closure and freeze on aid will kill African children. The Trump administration already created a waiver for HIV treatment and resumed aid for tuberculosis, malaria, and newborn health. And USAID’s health programs should be subject to scrutiny, given the agency’s history of using such programs as cover for other activities, including regime change and biodefense research. For example, under President Barack Obama’s administration, USAID was caught using an HIV program to foment rebellion in Cuba. USAID used EcoHealth Alliance as a passthrough organization to funnel $1.1 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was conducting risky gain-of-function experiments that may have caused the Covid pandemic. As such, anyone who truly believes in public health for poor people in poor nations must agree that USAID needs to be reined in and cleaned up. That starts first with precisely the kind of audit the Democrats are trying to stop. After that, USAID — and other government agencies eventually — must justify what they are spending money on. The public’s interest is ensuring that every dollar of taxpayer money is accounted for and justified. A major reason that the American people elected Trump was precisely because they believed he would reform the government, and that meant rooting out abuse, fraud, and waste. There is a large body of evidence of all three in USAID, the DOD, and the Department of Education. And, as for complying with the law on the closure of USAID, support for just such a law is growing in Congress. The media and others in Washington, D.C., have known for decades that USAID was a hub of fraud and abuse. The Washington Post cited two individuals with the Center for Global Development, a center-left think tank funded by Bill Gates that has been defending USAID, who told the Washington Post that a claim by Musk that just 10% of USAID money reached people on the ground was “wildly incorrect and misleading.” But their clarification — that just “10 percent of USAID payments are made directly to organizations in the developing world” and the “remaining 90 percent” is delivered by organizations in the US and developed world — underscored that USAID fundamentally isn’t working. Think about it. If USAID were so effective in achieving its ostensible goal of “development,” why are the countries it works in still so poor and underdeveloped? In truth, Democrats and Republicans alike have recognized for decades that USAID needed reform. In 2015, even the Center for Global Development urged a “top-to-bottom review of USAID’s sector- and country-based activities based upon program effectiveness, allocation of USAID resources, alignment with partner priorities, and national security implications” followed by “comprehensive reform.” As recently as 2021, the media acknowledged the obvious. That year, the New York Times published an article headlined, “U.S. Aid to Central America Hasn’t Slowed Migration. Can Kamala Harris?” In it the Times acknowledged that “experts say the reasons that years of aid have not curbed migration” is in part because “much of the money is handed over to American companies, which swallow a lot of it for salaries, expenses and profits, often before any services are delivered” — precisely the reason President Trump shut down USAID. Wrote the Times, “From 2016 to 2020, 80 percent of the American-financed development projects in Central America were entrusted to American contractors, according to data provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development.” It’s the same story for education. Just 10 days ago, the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) released the latest test scores showing yet another decline in reading and continued flat-lining in math for eighth graders. The media described the test results as a “new low” and “even worse” than in the past and “disheartening.” Democrats and the media thus know perfectly well that the Department of Education’s work is either insufficient to counteract the decline or is actively contributing to it, and thus reform of the Department of Education is highly reasonable. And yet Democrats demanded they be allowed to enter the Department of Education headquarters in Washington as though to defend it. From what? Improvement? The position of the Democrats is even more ridiculous when one considers the example of the Defense Department. Will Democrats now, after decades of attacking military spending as wasteful, defend it? If they do, they will alienate their own partisans. But if they don’t, then they will find it difficult to answer the question of why reform is necessary in the military but not in the Department of Education or USAID? Making the situation even more surreal is that it was Democrats, not Republicans, who made the biggest push for government efficiency and reform in the last thirty years. In 1993, shortly after taking office, President Bill Clinton empowered Vice President Al Gore to oversee a “Reinventing Government” initiative. The aim was to streamline bureaucracy, cut costs, and improve government efficiency. It emphasized customer service, performance-based management, and innovation — all things that Musk is famous for implementing at his companies. It’s not obvious why Democrats are opposing Trump’s actions. Doing so reinforces that they are the party of waste, fraud, and abuse. Polling shows that public support for Trump is at an all-time high of 53%, according to a new CBS poll. By contrast, 57% of registered voters have an unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party, the worst numbers in 17 years. Nor is it obvious why the media has maintained its anti-Trump bias. The Washington Post’s daily traffic declined by nearly 90% from 23 million daily active users in January 2021 to 2.5 to 3 million in the middle of last year. In the week ending November 24, CNN and MSNBC lost 47% and 53% of their primetime viewership. Last month, CNN announced it was laying off 200 employees while MSNBC saw its president step down. Politico’s cofounder said last week that “The left right now, liberal media, has probably never been weaker in my lifetime than right now.” The public desperately wants reform, and 60% of the public has long supported cutting foreign aid, which has long been popular with the public. Why can’t Democrats and the media just embrace Trump’s government efficiency effort? Why are they engaging in such seemingly self-destructive behavior? Please subscribe now to support Public's award winning journalism, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article by alex gutentag and Michael Shellenberger !
9:55

President Donald Trump is causing a constitutional crisis by eliminating the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and giving Elon Musk access to confidential Treasury records, say the media and Democrats. The American people didn’t elect Musk, said Democrats in a rally on Friday, where some House members were disallowed from entering the Department of Education. A judge on Friday restricted Musk’s team’s access to Treasury records. Trump yesterday, in an interview with Bret Baier of Fox, said that Musk would soon begin seeking efficiencies in the Departments of Defense and Education. As such, what’s happening is a “constitutional crisis,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin on Meet the Press, where he threatened a class action lawsuit on behalf of the American people. But there is no constitutional crisis. The American people elected Trump as president, and he, not Congress, exercises authority over all executive branch agencies, including USAID, the Department of Education, the Department of Defense, and the Treasury Department. Trump has clear Constitutional authority to audit the finances overseen by the Treasury and every other agency, and that includes assigning that audit to whoever he chooses. The Constitution grants Congress oversight duties but those powers do not include members being allowed to enter any executive branch building whenever they please. None of that means that the administration should ignore Congress, court orders, or the potential public health problems that could be created by the closure of USAID and freezing of its funds. Said the surgeon, New Yorker author, and former USAID official, Atul Gawande, on X, “20M people with HIV, including 500,000 children, have been cut off from access to medicines keeping them alive. Global HIV transmission, resistance, and deaths will now increase, endangering all.” Gawande added that, as a result of the loss of USAID, the US has lost critical bird flu surveillance, sacrificed humanitarian aid in Gaza, and halted the resettlement of former Islamic State combatants. USAID may have been doing and funding projects that were worthwhile. And it may be that Congress will need to pass legislation to continue those projects through the State Department. But it’s emotional blackmail to suggest the USAID closure and freeze on aid will kill African children. The Trump administration already created a waiver for HIV treatment and resumed aid for tuberculosis, malaria, and newborn health. And USAID’s health programs should be subject to scrutiny, given the agency’s history of using such programs as cover for other activities, including regime change and biodefense research. For example, under President Barack Obama’s administration, USAID was caught using an HIV program to foment rebellion in Cuba. USAID used EcoHealth Alliance as a passthrough organization to funnel $1.1 million to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was conducting risky gain-of-function experiments that may have caused the Covid pandemic. As such, anyone who truly believes in public health for poor people in poor nations must agree that USAID needs to be reined in and cleaned up. That starts first with precisely the kind of audit the Democrats are trying to stop. After that, USAID — and other government agencies eventually — must justify what they are spending money on. The public’s interest is ensuring that every dollar of taxpayer money is accounted for and justified. A major reason that the American people elected Trump was precisely because they believed he would reform the government, and that meant rooting out abuse, fraud, and waste. There is a large body of evidence of all three in USAID, the DOD, and the Department of Education. And, as for complying with the law on the closure of USAID, support for just such a law is growing in Congress. The media and others in Washington, D.C., have known for decades that USAID was a hub of fraud and abuse. The Washington Post cited two individuals with the Center for Global Development, a center-left think tank funded by Bill Gates that has been defending USAID, who told the Washington Post that a claim by Musk that just 10% of USAID money reached people on the ground was “wildly incorrect and misleading.” But their clarification — that just “10 percent of USAID payments are made directly to organizations in the developing world” and the “remaining 90 percent” is delivered by organizations in the US and developed world — underscored that USAID fundamentally isn’t working. Think about it. If USAID were so effective in achieving its ostensible goal of “development,” why are the countries it works in still so poor and underdeveloped? In truth, Democrats and Republicans alike have recognized for decades that USAID needed reform. In 2015, even the Center for Global Development urged a “top-to-bottom review of USAID’s sector- and country-based activities based upon program effectiveness, allocation of USAID resources, alignment with partner priorities, and national security implications” followed by “comprehensive reform.” As recently as 2021, the media acknowledged the obvious. That year, the New York Times published an article headlined, “U.S. Aid to Central America Hasn’t Slowed Migration. Can Kamala Harris?” In it the Times acknowledged that “experts say the reasons that years of aid have not curbed migration” is in part because “much of the money is handed over to American companies, which swallow a lot of it for salaries, expenses and profits, often before any services are delivered” — precisely the reason President Trump shut down USAID. Wrote the Times, “From 2016 to 2020, 80 percent of the American-financed development projects in Central America were entrusted to American contractors, according to data provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development.” It’s the same story for education. Just 10 days ago, the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) released the latest test scores showing yet another decline in reading and continued flat-lining in math for eighth graders. The media described the test results as a “new low” and “even worse” than in the past and “disheartening.” Democrats and the media thus know perfectly well that the Department of Education’s work is either insufficient to counteract the decline or is actively contributing to it, and thus reform of the Department of Education is highly reasonable. And yet Democrats demanded they be allowed to enter the Department of Education headquarters in Washington as though to defend it. From what? Improvement? The position of the Democrats is even more ridiculous when one considers the example of the Defense Department. Will Democrats now, after decades of attacking military spending as wasteful, defend it? If they do, they will alienate their own partisans. But if they don’t, then they will find it difficult to answer the question of why reform is necessary in the military but not in the Department of Education or USAID? Making the situation even more surreal is that it was Democrats, not Republicans, who made the biggest push for government efficiency and reform in the last thirty years. In 1993, shortly after taking office, President Bill Clinton empowered Vice President Al Gore to oversee a “Reinventing Government” initiative. The aim was to streamline bureaucracy, cut costs, and improve government efficiency. It emphasized customer service, performance-based management, and innovation — all things that Musk is famous for implementing at his companies. It’s not obvious why Democrats are opposing Trump’s actions. Doing so reinforces that they are the party of waste, fraud, and abuse. Polling shows that public support for Trump is at an all-time high of 53%, according to a new CBS poll. By contrast, 57% of registered voters have an unfavorable opinion of the Democratic Party, the worst numbers in 17 years. Nor is it obvious why the media has maintained its anti-Trump bias. The Washington Post’s daily traffic declined by nearly 90% from 23 million daily active users in January 2021 to 2.5 to 3 million in the middle of last year. In the week ending November 24, CNN and MSNBC lost 47% and 53% of their primetime viewership. Last month, CNN announced it was laying off 200 employees while MSNBC saw its president step down. Politico’s cofounder said last week that “The left right now, liberal media, has probably never been weaker in my lifetime than right now.” The public desperately wants reform, and 60% of the public has long supported cutting foreign aid, which has long been popular with the public. Why can’t Democrats and the media just embrace Trump’s government efficiency effort? Why are they engaging in such seemingly self-destructive behavior? Please subscribe now to support Public's award winning journalism, watch the rest of the video, and read the rest of the article by alex gutentag and Michael Shellenberger !

Michael Shellenberger

123,199 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨JASON CALACANIS: "How USAID got to the top of the DOGE list is that Trump decided to pause Foreign Aid for 90 days -- reasonable enough. A couple days later the White House said this USAID leadership was trying to circumvent this Executive Order. That alerted the DOGE team and Elon confirmed this on X. He said all DOGE did was check to see which Federal Agency was violating Trump's orders the most and that turned out to be USAID, so that became our focus."
1:59

🚨JASON CALACANIS: "How USAID got to the top of the DOGE list is that Trump decided to pause Foreign Aid for 90 days -- reasonable enough. A couple days later the White House said this USAID leadership was trying to circumvent this Executive Order. That alerted the DOGE team and Elon confirmed this on X. He said all DOGE did was check to see which Federal Agency was violating Trump's orders the most and that turned out to be USAID, so that became our focus."

Autism Capital 🧩

6,753,428 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨USAID: Unhinged Democrats have moved to the “Republicans want to k*ll babies” stage of their propaganda hysteria — — Sen Chris Murphy says USAID employees leaving their jobs means there will be "hundreds of thousands" of “dead children." "Well, the consequences are that people die. Babies die. I mean, right now we are involved in Gaza and in Sudan in providing food to malnourished babies. Literally, there will be dead children, the hundreds, thousands of them, and China will very quickly jump into the void." This is sick stuff, desperately trying further the lie that USAID is a humanitarian aid organization. Democrats have been completely broken over their corrupt USAID slush fund being exposed and dismantled.
1:08

🚨USAID: Unhinged Democrats have moved to the “Republicans want to k*ll babies” stage of their propaganda hysteria — — Sen Chris Murphy says USAID employees leaving their jobs means there will be "hundreds of thousands" of “dead children." "Well, the consequences are that people die. Babies die. I mean, right now we are involved in Gaza and in Sudan in providing food to malnourished babies. Literally, there will be dead children, the hundreds, thousands of them, and China will very quickly jump into the void." This is sick stuff, desperately trying further the lie that USAID is a humanitarian aid organization. Democrats have been completely broken over their corrupt USAID slush fund being exposed and dismantled.

Western Lensman

167,171 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here it is: The Hungarian government is releasing a documentary on how Democrats funneled money through one sponsor of terror, USAID, to another, George Soros, to promote Democrat agendas such as the invasion at the U.S. border, transgenders, and war stances—and bribed the media while doing it. “The movie will focus on revealing how USAID funneled millions of dollars into ideological movements in their country. They claim that political organizations and liberal media, which claim to be independent, received money through USAID to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders, and war stances. Orbán’s government says USAID is working with George Soros’s Open Society Foundations in the plot.”
0:34

Here it is: The Hungarian government is releasing a documentary on how Democrats funneled money through one sponsor of terror, USAID, to another, George Soros, to promote Democrat agendas such as the invasion at the U.S. border, transgenders, and war stances—and bribed the media while doing it. “The movie will focus on revealing how USAID funneled millions of dollars into ideological movements in their country. They claim that political organizations and liberal media, which claim to be independent, received money through USAID to promote Democrat agendas such as illegal migration, transgenders, and war stances. Orbán’s government says USAID is working with George Soros’s Open Society Foundations in the plot.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

132,291 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It was ALL a lie. The real reason USAID was in Africa Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao: “They're using that open access, sounding humanitarian, to constantly destabilize governments” “We need to understand the real reason why USAID is in Africa, and not just USAID, but other NGOs They are coming in claiming that they're introducing grassroots initiatives that are going to help the people, and so they use that as a way to go into the most remote parts of Africa. When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good, but they're actually wolf in sheep's clothing.” “The American taxpayer needs to know the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID. A fraction is making it to the people” “They're using that open access sounding humanitarian to constantly destabilize governments. I can tell you right now, the majority of African leaders, and not just African leaders, but leaders in the developing world are celebrating the exit of USAID. If you think about it, their sole purpose, for example, filling in the gaps in healthcare and education, where is the change? Show me one country that USAID was in and education improved. Show me what country where USAID was in and healthcare improved?” They laundered our money This isn’t even a conspiracy theory, there are offices White House reports showing the money being sent over “never made it to ground level” Meaning it’s all stolen before it gets to the people it’s meant to help
2:00

It was ALL a lie. The real reason USAID was in Africa Former African Union Ambassador to the United States, Arikana Chihombori-Quao: “They're using that open access, sounding humanitarian, to constantly destabilize governments” “We need to understand the real reason why USAID is in Africa, and not just USAID, but other NGOs They are coming in claiming that they're introducing grassroots initiatives that are going to help the people, and so they use that as a way to go into the most remote parts of Africa. When you look at it on paper, it all looks really good, but they're actually wolf in sheep's clothing.” “The American taxpayer needs to know the billions of dollars that are being given to USAID. A fraction is making it to the people” “They're using that open access sounding humanitarian to constantly destabilize governments. I can tell you right now, the majority of African leaders, and not just African leaders, but leaders in the developing world are celebrating the exit of USAID. If you think about it, their sole purpose, for example, filling in the gaps in healthcare and education, where is the change? Show me one country that USAID was in and education improved. Show me what country where USAID was in and healthcare improved?” They laundered our money This isn’t even a conspiracy theory, there are offices White House reports showing the money being sent over “never made it to ground level” Meaning it’s all stolen before it gets to the people it’s meant to help

Wall Street Apes

265,721 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I didn't expect Democrats to come out and admit that USAID is a cover for the CIA doing regime changes all around the world, but here we are. USAID needs to be disbanded NOW! This is NOT what America should be involved in.
2:55

I didn't expect Democrats to come out and admit that USAID is a cover for the CIA doing regime changes all around the world, but here we are. USAID needs to be disbanded NOW! This is NOT what America should be involved in.

Gunther Eagleman™

218,594 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr