Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Confession signed. Case closed. Then the prosecutor asked: would you do it again? “I’d have killed Michael for sure. I don't know about the other two.” Randy Barnett on how his one well-timed question helped send a Latin King to death row, on Counterweight:

Will Chamberlain

431,787 subscribers

12,627 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Comments

Will Chamberlain1 day ago

Listen here: Apple: Spotify: YouTube:

Joe Dirté1 day ago

@RandyEBarnett Another great guest. You’ll have to have Randy back on when the book comes out.

Make Boston Red Again1 day ago

@RandyEBarnett randy barnett did in one sentence what a dozen panels couldn't: ask 'would you do it again?'... answer: yes. that's the difference between hypotheticals and hard evidence. prosecutors, keep asking the obvious.

Kate1 day ago

@RandyEBarnett Let's hope he gets death sooner than later.

Principal⭐️1 day ago

@RandyEBarnett That one question exposed the mindset behind the crime. Chilling and a powerful reminder that words can matter even after a confession.

Related Videos

.Prem Thakker: “Do you know how many Americans Israeli soldiers and settlers have killed?” GOP Rep. Jim Jordan: “I'm for helping Israel.” Question: “But you have no answer about the Americans killed by Israel?” Jordan: “I don't know about any Americans killed by Israel.”

.Prem Thakker: “Do you know how many Americans Israeli soldiers and settlers have killed?” GOP Rep. Jim Jordan: “I'm for helping Israel.” Question: “But you have no answer about the Americans killed by Israel?” Jordan: “I don't know about any Americans killed by Israel.”

Zeteo

173,686 views • 5 months ago

Lee: Would say it would be “illegal DEI” for a lesson plan on the Tulsa race massacre? McMahon: I’d have to get back to you Lee: Do you know what the Tulsa race massacre is? McMahon: I’d like to look into it more and get back to you on it. Lee: How about the book from Ruby Bridges? McMahon: I haven’t read that Lee: Have you learned about Ruby Bridges? McMahon: If you have specific examples— Lee: That was a specific example

Lee: Would say it would be “illegal DEI” for a lesson plan on the Tulsa race massacre? McMahon: I’d have to get back to you Lee: Do you know what the Tulsa race massacre is? McMahon: I’d like to look into it more and get back to you on it. Lee: How about the book from Ruby Bridges? McMahon: I haven’t read that Lee: Have you learned about Ruby Bridges? McMahon: If you have specific examples— Lee: That was a specific example

Acyn

2,039,682 views • 1 year ago

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How do you know when it's the right time to hire?" If you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How do you know when it's the right time to hire?" If you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

Gary Vaynerchuk

10,605 views • 5 months ago

President Trump just turned a simple question about Hunter Biden running in 2028 into a full-on comedy routine in the Oval Office. Everyone was cracking up with each part of his answer. DOOCY: “I have a question about Hunter Biden. He’s on social media now, and he has suggested...that he could run for president in 2028. How would he do, Hunter Biden, in a 2028 Democratic primary?” TRUMP: “Well, you would think that past has something to do with winning an election.” “I would say his past is not the greatest...” “Where’s Hunter? Right, remember my ‘Where’s Hunter?’ It became the number one shirt anywhere in the world for about three weeks.” “I’m not gonna say...you know, hey, if the guy from Maine can do well, I guess Hunter can do well too.” “Because the guy from Maine is a basket case.” “And I would say worse than him is the one from Texas...” “That looks like Alfred E. Neuman.” “I would say that if he can do well, maybe Hunter can do well.”

President Trump just turned a simple question about Hunter Biden running in 2028 into a full-on comedy routine in the Oval Office. Everyone was cracking up with each part of his answer. DOOCY: “I have a question about Hunter Biden. He’s on social media now, and he has suggested...that he could run for president in 2028. How would he do, Hunter Biden, in a 2028 Democratic primary?” TRUMP: “Well, you would think that past has something to do with winning an election.” “I would say his past is not the greatest...” “Where’s Hunter? Right, remember my ‘Where’s Hunter?’ It became the number one shirt anywhere in the world for about three weeks.” “I’m not gonna say...you know, hey, if the guy from Maine can do well, I guess Hunter can do well too.” “Because the guy from Maine is a basket case.” “And I would say worse than him is the one from Texas...” “That looks like Alfred E. Neuman.” “I would say that if he can do well, maybe Hunter can do well.”

Overton

303,209 views • 3 months ago

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How would you handle working two jobs while trying to get a business off the ground?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How would you handle working two jobs while trying to get a business off the ground?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

Gary Vaynerchuk

20,922 views • 2 months ago

New on Counterweight: Randy Barnett takes us through his years as a prosecutor, with stories of true crime and corruption that are worth hearing. Randy is the Patrick Hotung Professor of Constitutional Law at the Georgetown University Law Center and the Faculty Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution. He's authored more than a dozen books and appeared before the United States Supreme Court in 2004, where he argued Gonzales v. Raich. But before any of that, Randy was a prosecutor in the Cook County State's Attorney's Office in Chicago in the late 1970s and early 1980s. His latest book, FELONY REVIEW, is the story of those years: learning how to be a prosecutor on the job, coming face-to-face with brazen corruption in the misdemeanor courts, working night shifts at police stations reviewing every potential felony charge that came through the door, and ultimately trying major felony cases. I've brought him on Counterweight to talk about his time as a prosecutor — and at the end, he gives us his take on the recent Lindsay Clancy mistrial with the benefit of that experience. 0:00 Caballero — “I’d a killed Michael for sure” 3:09 Harvard Law to Cook County prosecutor 8:13 Judge Crowley and learning what “bullsh*t” means 13:05 Bond slips and corruption in the misdemeanor courts 17:47 The chop shop case — Dollars Devine and Eddie Jensen 22:49 No continuance — judge on vacation, fixer exposed 28:07 Felony Review — 24/7 charging calls in the police stations 33:17 One stab wound — charge or let go 38:12 Caballero confession and the death penalty 46:40 Lindsay Clancy and the insanity defense 49:17 Dangerousness over culpability

New on Counterweight: Randy Barnett takes us through his years as a prosecutor, with stories of true crime and corruption that are worth hearing. Randy is the Patrick Hotung Professor of Constitutional Law at the Georgetown University Law Center and the Faculty Director of the Georgetown Center for the Constitution. He's authored more than a dozen books and appeared before the United States Supreme Court in 2004, where he argued Gonzales v. Raich. But before any of that, Randy was a prosecutor in the Cook County State's Attorney's Office in Chicago in the late 1970s and early 1980s. His latest book, FELONY REVIEW, is the story of those years: learning how to be a prosecutor on the job, coming face-to-face with brazen corruption in the misdemeanor courts, working night shifts at police stations reviewing every potential felony charge that came through the door, and ultimately trying major felony cases. I've brought him on Counterweight to talk about his time as a prosecutor — and at the end, he gives us his take on the recent Lindsay Clancy mistrial with the benefit of that experience. 0:00 Caballero — “I’d a killed Michael for sure” 3:09 Harvard Law to Cook County prosecutor 8:13 Judge Crowley and learning what “bullsh*t” means 13:05 Bond slips and corruption in the misdemeanor courts 17:47 The chop shop case — Dollars Devine and Eddie Jensen 22:49 No continuance — judge on vacation, fixer exposed 28:07 Felony Review — 24/7 charging calls in the police stations 33:17 One stab wound — charge or let go 38:12 Caballero confession and the death penalty 46:40 Lindsay Clancy and the insanity defense 49:17 Dangerousness over culpability

Will Chamberlain

11,382 views • 1 day ago

HILARIOUS: CNN’s Jake Tapper: “Well, I know you don't want to talk about any other issues out of respect for Lindsey Graham, but we would love to have you back some time, because I do have a lot of other questions for you, sir.” President Trump: “Sure. We’ll do that. We’ll do that.” “We’re trying to have CNN go on a normal path. And we’ll do that.” Jake Tapper: “Well, I’m on a normal path right here, sir. And I appreciate your time.” President Trump: “Good! You are.”

HILARIOUS: CNN’s Jake Tapper: “Well, I know you don't want to talk about any other issues out of respect for Lindsey Graham, but we would love to have you back some time, because I do have a lot of other questions for you, sir.” President Trump: “Sure. We’ll do that. We’ll do that.” “We’re trying to have CNN go on a normal path. And we’ll do that.” Jake Tapper: “Well, I’m on a normal path right here, sir. And I appreciate your time.” President Trump: “Good! You are.”

RedWave Press

775,352 views • 2 months ago

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "I know how much I know that you talk about how much your mother's support meant to you. If you could envision that your mom had been strongly opposed to you starting your own company, your adventures, what would what would you have done to overcome that?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "I know how much I know that you talk about how much your mother's support meant to you. If you could envision that your mom had been strongly opposed to you starting your own company, your adventures, what would what would you have done to overcome that?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

Gary Vaynerchuk

37,407 views • 1 month ago

"When Liverpool have the ball I would be building it around those two...the big question is then what do you do for your press?" "It's not been sorted out all season...have him defending a smaller area, then you can maximise his legs and energy - we need him on the pitch for the duration." 🎙️ The Review

"When Liverpool have the ball I would be building it around those two...the big question is then what do you do for your press?" "It's not been sorted out all season...have him defending a smaller area, then you can maximise his legs and energy - we need him on the pitch for the duration." 🎙️ The Review

The Anfield Wrap

26,897 views • 7 months ago

Mayor Frey was asked a simple question: how many illegal immigrants are in Minneapolis? His answer: "I don't know. I don't really have a guess." You don't know? With everything happening right now, you’d think that would be data worth brushing up on.

Mayor Frey was asked a simple question: how many illegal immigrants are in Minneapolis? His answer: "I don't know. I don't really have a guess." You don't know? With everything happening right now, you’d think that would be data worth brushing up on.

Mario Nawfal

445,384 views • 7 months ago

Dear Suhasini Haidar, Why are you whitewashing the Norwegian journalist's "question"? You seem to suggest she asked: What do you have to say about human rights? NO! She actually asked: Can you promise to try to stop human rights violations in your country? The second one is NOT a question, but an accusation. Both "yes" and "no" responses to her "question" would falsely implicate India As a senior journalist, you know the difference very well... you know these tricks very well. You should call her out for making a false accusation dressed up as a question. Why don't you?

Dear Suhasini Haidar, Why are you whitewashing the Norwegian journalist's "question"? You seem to suggest she asked: What do you have to say about human rights? NO! She actually asked: Can you promise to try to stop human rights violations in your country? The second one is NOT a question, but an accusation. Both "yes" and "no" responses to her "question" would falsely implicate India As a senior journalist, you know the difference very well... you know these tricks very well. You should call her out for making a false accusation dressed up as a question. Why don't you?

Abhishek

42,439 views • 3 months ago

NEW: NASCAR star Tyler Reddick responds following Michael Jordan's "interaction" with his 6-year-old son after Reddick's Daytona 500 win. The comments from Reddick came on Stephen A. Smith's SiriusXM show. "From my perspective, I've gotten to know Michael and his family very well over the years..." "I don't see what other people see when it comes to this. You know, for me, it's a huge moment..." "I put that off to the side and just think about how I think about the look on [Michael Jordan’s wife's] face and the whole family..." "So, yeah, that's where I'm at with it."

NEW: NASCAR star Tyler Reddick responds following Michael Jordan's "interaction" with his 6-year-old son after Reddick's Daytona 500 win. The comments from Reddick came on Stephen A. Smith's SiriusXM show. "From my perspective, I've gotten to know Michael and his family very well over the years..." "I don't see what other people see when it comes to this. You know, for me, it's a huge moment..." "I put that off to the side and just think about how I think about the look on [Michael Jordan’s wife's] face and the whole family..." "So, yeah, that's where I'm at with it."

Collin Rugg

1,503,179 views • 6 months ago

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How would you handle being the main supporter for your family, but you hate what you do?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "How would you handle being the main supporter for your family, but you hate what you do?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

Gary Vaynerchuk

22,596 views • 2 months ago

Car vs what? A snowman you say? 🤨 Well, I don't know about you, but I would have loved to listen in on the phone call to the car's insurance company! 😂

Car vs what? A snowman you say? 🤨 Well, I don't know about you, but I would have loved to listen in on the phone call to the car's insurance company! 😂

AllieJade

59,383 views • 10 months ago

"I don't know... How do the fans feel about it? I don't want to come in on a bad foot, you know?" What do you say, Giants fans? Should Verlander wear 35?

"I don't know... How do the fans feel about it? I don't want to come in on a bad foot, you know?" What do you say, Giants fans? Should Verlander wear 35?

KNBR

58,246 views • 1 year ago

On Counterweight, I asked Rahul Sidhu about the toughest question I'd seen anyone pose about Flock: that if the localities do indeed own the data, wouldn't he have to concede that Flock cameras could be used to enforce lockdown policies in the future? Here's how he responded:

On Counterweight, I asked Rahul Sidhu about the toughest question I'd seen anyone pose about Flock: that if the localities do indeed own the data, wouldn't he have to concede that Flock cameras could be used to enforce lockdown policies in the future? Here's how he responded:

Will Chamberlain

21,726 views • 13 days ago

Paul Dano on if will return as Riddler and if has read the script for ‘THE BATMAN: PART 2’ “I don’t know... I hope maybe I’ll get to dance again... I know a very little bit about it, but what I do know, I am excited by, for sure, and I would be surprised if you wouldn’t be as well.” (via Collider)

Paul Dano on if will return as Riddler and if has read the script for ‘THE BATMAN: PART 2’ “I don’t know... I hope maybe I’ll get to dance again... I know a very little bit about it, but what I do know, I am excited by, for sure, and I would be surprised if you wouldn’t be as well.” (via Collider)

The Batman Saga News

24,514 views • 4 months ago