Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Confirmed Whis' ultra instinct DOES NOT drain ki even outside training mode, Whis has lore accurate Angelic Ultra Instinct, training mode was not why he had no ki drain clip via @DeathDaddy__ source video via Cerealkillerz #SparkingZero

891,822 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Todd Ferguson
Todd Fergusonvor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT I’ve never been more ready in my life

Profilbild von ChyroXZ 超
ChyroXZ 超vor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT I just know the lobbies are gonna be full of Whis mains 😭

Profilbild von E-Man
E-Manvor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT So how tf do you beat him?💀

Profilbild von Hydro
Hydrovor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT DBL players who suffered terrifying metas that go beyond comprehension:

Profilbild von ًً
ًًvor 1 Jahr

Cost system gonna come in clutch with this mf

Profilbild von MagicMist
MagicMistvor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT Need to keep a ginyu on the squad for Whis Mains

Profilbild von Hyler321
Hyler321vor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT Goku can be hit by Ki Blasts. Whis can't. If you main Whis in SZ, you a bitch and pussy. Those are the rules.

Profilbild von Sakamoto7-
Sakamoto7-vor 1 Jahr

@CerealkillerzAT lol Whis might be banned in pro tournaments but he may make one hell of a troll video tho .

Profilbild von Haruto ⚪️
Haruto ⚪️vor 1 Jahr

@DeathDaddy__ @CerealkillerzAT Still low tier day 1

Ähnliche Videos

George Stephanopoulos was warned repeatedly to not use the word rape in regards to Trump. He chose to ignore the advice 10 separate times: Megyn Kelly: "Breaking this morning in The New York Post that according to them, George Stephanopoulos was warned by his executive producer not to use the word rape in describing what a jury had found Trump civilly liable for that his producer had said to him it it was not rape. Don't call it rape. And it appears he ignored that advice. It just shows the depths of hatred, like Fannie Willis that George Stephanopoulos has for Trump. Stephanopoulos was repeatedly told by his executive producer not to use the word rape before going on air, but the ABC News anchor ignored the warning this week's producer, because he said this on a Sunday show said don't use the word rape. A second source at the show listen to this confirmed via a text message viewed by the Post that Stephanopoulos was warned not to say rape. So this post has since some sort of text message in which a second source somehow confirms that George was told not to say rape. I don't want to hear one more word from anybody about why did ABC News settle? You know, people think they had a shot at winning. First of all, they didn't because it's very clear he wasn't found civilly liable for rape. But second of all, you've got the EP saying I told him not to do it, and he insisted on doing it ten times." Ironic that George was the one who ignored the consent. Corroborates what we already knew: ABC would gladly pay 15 million dollars for the public to not know the depths of their corruption and bias towards Trump.

Eric Abbenante

520,138 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Tommy Robinson tried to appeal against his incarceration conditions and the following details have emerged: He gets 3 hours out of his cell every day - when he can exercise, use the gym or play recreational games such as pool. He gets another 2 hours and 45 minutes, 3 times a week when he does painting and decorating work. He has "significantly more visit time than any other prisoner", with 2 hours, 4 times a week, in a room described as "more informal and comfortable", where he can take in food he's bought from the canteen. He has 120 people on his visitors list and has had 93 visits. He can use the phone for 4 hours a day and has made more than 1,250 social calls. He has a television, a laptop - on which he receives emails "in their hundreds" - a CD player and a DVD player in his cell. He attends a weekly bible session and has daily visits from a member of the chaplaincy team and daily visits from an NHS doctor or nurse. As someone who was locked up for 9 months for exposing a rape gang - and spent 6 weeks in TOTAL solitary confinement - let me tell you, this in NOT EVEN prison, LET ALONE segregation. When I was in solitary I had ZERO time outside of my cell other than to shower (which was a narrow concrete wet room that I was locked into from the outside) or to walk alone around a tiny square yard with high wire fencing all around it ONCE in 6 weeks. NO visits, NO Bible sessions, NO gym, NO pool, NO laptop, NO emails, NO CD player, NO DVD player, NO daily chaplaincy visits, NO daily NHS doctor or nurse visits, NO 3 hours out of my cell, NO 2 hours with friends and family, NO 2 hours 45 mins painting and decorating, NO 4 hours of phone time every day, I WAS NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO ATTEND CHURCH DURING EASTER. Tommy was adamant that he would rather go to prison for contempt of court than to take down his video about a schoolboy. Whether you like it or not, this was his decision. Of course, Tommy fans will say that he should not be locked up (despite him pleading guilty to contempt of court)... But please do not pretend that he is languishing down the block! The man is enjoying more leisure time than most of us on the outside who are working full-time jobs. If he is struggling to cope with ALL of those privileges, he wouldn't last 5 MINUTES in a real jail, take it from someone who knows.

Jayda Fransen

38,033 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This video was recorded during my time as an English service pastor in a charismatic church. What you are seeing is not speculation or secondhand stories. This is something I witnessed with my own eyes, lived through, and carried the weight of for years. My senior pastor (the old guy in the suit) had just returned from a Kenneth Copeland conference. He came back convinced that he had encountered a “new move of the Spirit” and he was determined to bring it into our church. What followed still grieves me when I think about it. To make this so called move believable, he arranged for a couple to act drunk in the Spirit. They staggered, laughed uncontrollably, and collapsed on the floor as if overtaken by some supernatural force. This was not spontaneous. It was planned. They were the demonstration. They were meant to convince the congregation that something powerful was happening. Then the pressure began. As the pastor began pointing at people across the hall, one by one they fell. Not because the Spirit overwhelmed them, but because fear did. No one wanted to be the person left standing. No one wanted to be accused of resisting the Spirit or lacking faith. So people gave in. They fell. They laughed. They played the part that was expected of them. It was emotional manipulation dressed up in spiritual language. It was peer pressure baptized and sold as power. The Spirit of God does not rob a man of self control. He does not create confusion. He does not produce chaos. Scripture is clear that God is not the author of disorder, but of peace. Yet we were being trained to celebrate disorder and call it divine. These manifestations were not holiness. They were not repentance. They were not transformation. They were performances created to keep people compliant and silent. When I began to question these practices, I was made to feel ashamed for even daring to speak. The senior pastor staged a dramatic scene, claiming that my questioning had cut his connection with the Holy Spirit and that he would die without it, insisting he could not survive if I remained in his presence. That moment ended with me being physically thrown out by his bodyguards. My voice was silenced through his political influence, and everything I had recorded the evidence of manipulation, planning, and what went on behind closed doors was erased by church staff. They made sure no trace was left behind. But by the providence of God, this one clip survived. It remains as a witness to what many are still trapped in today. Not revival. Not power. But deception that preys on sincere people who truly want God and are instead given a counterfeit. This is why I speak. This is why I warn. And this is why I will not stay silent.

Jeremiah Knight

55,431 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson is echoing Iran's claim regarding the bombing of an Iranian girls' school. And he echoed Candace Owens, saying that if his fears are right, the U.S. "is not worth fighting for," akin to her calls for soldiers to refuse orders. Tucker has no basis for his "fears," though, only reckless speculation. Why? At a basic level, we don’t know yet what exactly happened, and no information has come out as to why or how the strike happened. Video analysis suggests that a Tomahawk missile hit a building near the school, but not the school itself. So it could have been a secondary explosion. It also could have a horrible mistake, with the U.S. making targeting decisions based on outdated maps from the time the school building HAD been part of the IRGC base. Tucker does not explicitly state that the bombing was intentional, BUT... he strongly suggests it might have been, or that AI was in control, rather than a human. Is it possible that AI was given unchecked kill authority? Perhaps, but there's no reason to believe that scenario to be anything other than remote. So why does Tucker go directly to such speculation as his lead theory? True, Tucker said, "As an American, you have to believe this was a tragic mistake." But his insinuation is clear — the main reason to believe it was a "mistake" is merely faith. He even stated that it looked like a "double tap" with an intent to kill rescue workers. Never mind that the U.S. has never had a history of deliberately bombing schools. (Nor has Israel, of course.) But go there Tucker does. Just like Iran did in its propaganda about the bombing. And just like every other America hater with a platform. And he ends this YouTube Short — posted just minutes after the full show was — by saying that "if" the bombing was intentional, then the U.S. "is not worth fighting for." So if Tucker loves America so much, why does he suggest our soldiers should stop serving and spout the talking points of our enemies?

Joel Mowbray

31,704 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I first met Saud Abdulhamid on my very first trip to Riyadh. Saudi Arabia. I had gone there to see Odion Ighalo, back when he was still playing for Al Hilal. That day, I was standing outside the training ground, just waiting, taking everything in. Then suddenly, a beautiful white G-Wagon pulled up. The windows were fully tinted, so you couldn’t see who was inside. For a moment, I was convinced it had to be Ighalo. As the window rolled down, I got ready to greet him—only to be met by Saud, flashing his trademark smile. He waved at me, and I waved back, even though, truthfully, I had no idea who he was at the time. Not long after, Ighalo arrived, and we headed into the training ground. That’s when I properly met Saud, along with his brother. We had a brief chat before training started, and that was the beginning. Our paths crossed again when Saudi Arabia played Nigeria in a friendly match in Portugal. After the game, in the middle of the crowd, I heard someone shout, “Ighalo!”—it was Saud. From there, we stayed connected, following each other online, keeping in touch in our own way. Then came another reunion, this time in Lens, inside his small but tastefully furnished apartment in the heart of the city. Back then, things were still uncertain for him. He wasn’t playing regularly, but I remember him telling me clearly that he wanted to stay in Europe, stay with Lens, and fight for his place. There was a quiet determination about him. I could feel it. And today, looking at his journey, that belief has paid off. He has grown into an important player for the club, playing his part in helping them secure a Champions League spot. He’s become one of Saudi Arabia’s biggest ambassadors in Europe. And life keeps moving forward. He just got married too. Big congratulations to you, my brother. My next video will be dedicated to him. What a guy!

Oma Akatugba

81,689 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Truth Has Been Revealed About UFO Whistleblower Jake Barber’s Background Jacob “Jake” Barber (jakebarber) is a former Aerospace Maintenance (Mechanic) veteran who served in the USAF from 1994-2000. He is the newest individual to come forward as a UFO “whistleblower”, claiming to be a part of clandestine “UAP crash retrieval team”. In the initial NewsNation interview with Ross Coulthart and Jake, the segment was deceptively edited to make Jake seem like a “Tier 1 Operator” (stated by people like MarikvR, Lue Elizondo, and others) and a former Combat Controller (CCT). NewsNation deceptively edits a portion of the segment showing Barber’s paperwork to verify his service in the USAF and courses associated with the CCT program and schooling to seemingly deceive the public into thinking he’s a special forces operator. But that isn’t the case. My original post that is quoted to this one points out that Barber’s DD-214 shows that he was never a Combat Controller, but aAerospace Maintenance Mechanic. Jake states that that position is just a “cover position” for what he really did, leaving many to speculate. FYI: the USAF does not have “cover jobs”. Now, the unedited interview of Barber from NewsNation has been released and I was right! Jake was “washed out” of the CCT training and was given a position in aircraft maintenance. He phrases it in such a way to make it seem like he was recruited to do that as a cover, but that’s not how it works. He was most likely not performing well during a particular course and was approached by training instructors or admin staff to recycle into another AFSC. Why he doesn’t admit that is beyond me considering there is no shame in washing out as you are informed of the very high washout rate when considering the CCT position. But the truth continues to come out when he talks about his “trainings” which were activities that he was just doing on his own, in a non-official, non-certifying, group of personal hobbies. He was never instructed. He admits that. And why was he doing that? Because of what he claim was for “OPFOR” missions. What is OPFOR? OPFOR stands for “Opposing Forces” and are exercises that help give ACTUAL special forces personnel training opportunities that simulate real-world scenarios that could happen on live missions. Basically, in the most respectful sense, it’s regular USAF personnel LARPing as special operations or just typical ground forces of adversarial countries and terrorist groups. Furthermore, it’s been told to me by a source that there are NO OFFICIAL OPFOR UNITS AT POPE or FT BRAGG. If they are occurring, it would be as an additional duty and on a very small scale, NOT secret, simple training the base does for operational readiness purposes. Here is the USAF official site about OPFOR ( And to top it off, Jake admits that he is NOT A TIER 1 OPERATOR. NewsNation or someone has deceptively exaggerated his service for credibility for his outrageous claims and stories. His credibility is officially shot!

The Average Chris

187,506 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

❌j-hope MISINFORMATION: j-hope left for a while because of overwork/ j-hope left because he was receiving h@te ✅FACT: Yes, Jung Kook cried for him not to leave, but he still left to go home to his family ( source: 2018 Burn The Stage docuseries Episode 2) ✅ FACT: j-hope didn’t leave because he was hated or overworked; in fact, he was one of the pillars of the group, and he trained the boys in the School of Dance and also led the School of Hip-hop with RM and SUGA. He was praised by Bang PD for being the personification of diligence. They all went through stress, but thinking of him as someone who would give up easily does not align with true character. Understanding the lyrics of his songs, both in BTS and solo albums, will show how passionate he is about his work. ( sources to check: Beyond The Story, BTS official book published 2022 / Suchwita j-hope episode/lyrics of his songs / BTS Monument docuseries) ✅FACT: He was called to Seoul to help, especially with dance. " We want you to become a keypart of the team and help with the dancing a lot" (source: Fairy Jaehyung j-hope interview, March 23, 2025 ) ✅ FACT: He left for a short time before their debut ( no specific timeline provided) because there is no certainty of the group's debut yet, and he has been training since 2010 ( being the first Big Hit trainee since April 2010), but he has big dreams and plans, especially to help and repay his family for their sacrifices. He had a career path to think about and was determined to debut even before he was signed to Big Hit. He said he considered going to a different company and debut, but he came back to Big Hit not because of the company but because of his brothers. ( source: BTS Monument: Beyond The Star Disney Plus Documentary Episode 1 / Beyond The Story BTS official book ) ♡hobicasa curated Below are four supporting videos of these facts : #jhopeFacts

HobiCasa ⊙⊝⊜ARIRANG l🏊‍♂️🔴 YOUR, MY HOPE💖👟

37,704 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I’d break the Zlatan issue for many people including yourself. Narratives have traveled and I’ve come to conclude that many of you don’t even know what happened with Zlatan at Barcelona. Zlatan’s major issue was with Pep, he had no single issue with Messi, none. Till date, he maintains that beef with Pep. On Piers Morgan, Zlatan said the mistake he did when he got to Barcelona was trying to fit in. He got off a wrong start with Pep because he drove a Ferrari to training. In his words, he said Pep told him that, in this place, players don’t drive a Ferrari. Zlatan said he didn’t drive his car for 7-8 months just to please Pep and try to fit in, which was his biggest regret. Zlatan said he wasn’t performing and went to see Pep in his office. Firstly he went to meet the higher people up there in the hierarchy, but they told him that they can’t interfere and he should speak to Pep himself. He went to meet Pep and told him that the new formation does not favor him. By the way, this is absolutely normal. I have attacked a video to Salah talking with Slot. In fact, you could hear Salah towards the end of that video say he was going to speak to Slot so they could change formations. This is normal in professional football. Players speak to their coaches, especially the big players. Zlatan said the formation does not give him more freedom and it won’t get the best out of him. It’s best he does not play because he’s not performing, Pep is also egoistic, he benched Zlatan for 4 games in a row after that meeting. Zlatan said he created fire afterwards, he started bringing his Ferrari to training and parking it in front of Pep’s office 😭. He said when he went to Manchester United, Pep was at City and Pep will never look him in the eye. I have been able to establish that Zlatan’s problem at Barcelona was Pep, he said it himself and this is the link. I don’t do GOAL, I do facts. ( How does Messi come into this? Zlatan, in his book, said Messi spoke to Pep about switching formations, this formation switch is what affected him. He was playing better in the previous formation, and scoring. This new formation meant he had no freedom and that’s what he said on Piers Morgan, he went to see Pep. This thing Zlatan said is what you guys have been running with. You & I are not privy to the conversation Messi had with Pep. Both parties have never addressed this before to give their side of the story, if they have, you can share me a link of them saying it just like I shared you that link (not screenshots from GOAL please, be serious for once). If any of their mates have addressed this before, please share too. Again, Zlatan’s issue at Barcelona was with Pep right from day 1 of driving a Ferrari, this has nothing to do with Messi. Let’s assume Messi spoke to Pep on changing formation, and Pep agreed, it’s on Pep and he’s the manager. Messi speaking to his manager is normal, just like Zlatan going to speak with Pep. If you listen to the video I attached of Salah, he clearly mentions he spoke to Slot on not defending, and he will still speak to Slot for them to adapt their formation because oppositions are finding out. Players are in constant communication with their managers. Whatever they spoke about, Pep is the manager not Messi. Easy with your bragging too, telling me you don’t just write and no one should dare you to bring evidences. After spending hours in your research, you even slept overnight, and the source you could reference is “Goal”😭 Listen to Zlatan talk about why he loves Messi so much, this was few days ago by the way Another Stop creating issues where there’s none.

TobyWrites

100,025 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen