Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Confused MP

Arun Arora

74,080 subscribers

58,899 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

MP Peter Salasya Can't Hide His Joy After Meeting DCP Party Leader and Former DP Rigathi Gachagua, Though He Looks Confused and Dramatic.

MP Peter Salasya Can't Hide His Joy After Meeting DCP Party Leader and Former DP Rigathi Gachagua, Though He Looks Confused and Dramatic.

DP 🇰🇪

13,444 views • 2 months ago

Rupert Lowe MP This does not answer the question ? Can Resistance GB hold a position or stand as a representative of Restore Britain Redirect I’m still really confused 😂😂

Rupert Lowe MP This does not answer the question ? Can Resistance GB hold a position or stand as a representative of Restore Britain Redirect I’m still really confused 😂😂

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

950,021 views • 6 months ago

Hey Sir Jeremy Hunt MP 👋 Just another reminder that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not an ‘out of work’ benefit. If you’re still confused about disability benefits, check out our website. We've got lots of information that could help 🔗

Hey Sir Jeremy Hunt MP 👋 Just another reminder that Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is not an ‘out of work’ benefit. If you’re still confused about disability benefits, check out our website. We've got lots of information that could help 🔗

Scope

20,780 views • 2 years ago

సీఎం తమ్ముడు కొండల్ భూ కేటాయింపు వివాదంలో కాపాడటానికి తంటాలు పడుతున్న కాంగ్రెస్ 1.Whats wrong in allotting Land to CM Revanth brother Kondal's new company - Congress MP & Media Chairman 2. Did not allot any Land to CM brother's company - Congress Minister Congress confused ❗️

సీఎం తమ్ముడు కొండల్ భూ కేటాయింపు వివాదంలో కాపాడటానికి తంటాలు పడుతున్న కాంగ్రెస్ 1.Whats wrong in allotting Land to CM Revanth brother Kondal's new company - Congress MP & Media Chairman 2. Did not allot any Land to CM brother's company - Congress Minister Congress confused ❗️

Dr.Krishank

14,406 views • 21 days ago

🚨BREAKING NEWS: CARNEY UNDER FIRE🚨 A Liberal MP reveals that Mark Carney lied to media and Canadians when asked if he brought up human rights violations and foreign interference with China. Not misspoke, not confused - outright lied. And Ned Kuruc helped reveal it.

🚨BREAKING NEWS: CARNEY UNDER FIRE🚨 A Liberal MP reveals that Mark Carney lied to media and Canadians when asked if he brought up human rights violations and foreign interference with China. Not misspoke, not confused - outright lied. And Ned Kuruc helped reveal it.

Northern Perspective

186,487 views • 5 months ago

Excited for the start of the new F1 season? Confused what that has to do with economic policy? Watch Chancellor Sir Jeremy Hunt MP explain how boosting education will drive our economy into pole position from the driving seat of McLaren Mastercard Formula 1 Team McLaren Automotive.

Excited for the start of the new F1 season? Confused what that has to do with economic policy? Watch Chancellor Sir Jeremy Hunt MP explain how boosting education will drive our economy into pole position from the driving seat of McLaren Mastercard Formula 1 Team McLaren Automotive.

HM Treasury

794,020 views • 3 years ago

..Shiromani Akali Dal MP from Bathinda Harsimrat Kaur Badal strongly opposes the #WaqfBill2025 in Lok Sabha. Harsimrat badal says since early morning I'm confused & thinking "A political party from last three terms didn't have single muslim MPs, which EID Ka Chand they have seen" Further, MP Badal showing documents said that Waqf has 25% of property in Uttar Pradesh, more than any other state, BJP want to manage & use the waqf land.

..Shiromani Akali Dal MP from Bathinda Harsimrat Kaur Badal strongly opposes the #WaqfBill2025 in Lok Sabha. Harsimrat badal says since early morning I'm confused & thinking "A political party from last three terms didn't have single muslim MPs, which EID Ka Chand they have seen" Further, MP Badal showing documents said that Waqf has 25% of property in Uttar Pradesh, more than any other state, BJP want to manage & use the waqf land.

Akashdeep Thind

208,079 views • 1 year ago

Are Kenyans aware that Mp Johana Ngeno has just told President William Ruto This? Arent these the same issues that Gen Z and even Dp Rigathi Gachagua have been raising? 🚨 More Maandamano will bring sanity to Kenya. Also, Ndii is a confused person .Over to Nakuru State house.

Are Kenyans aware that Mp Johana Ngeno has just told President William Ruto This? Arent these the same issues that Gen Z and even Dp Rigathi Gachagua have been raising? 🚨 More Maandamano will bring sanity to Kenya. Also, Ndii is a confused person .Over to Nakuru State house.

Sholla Ard 🇰🇪

340,521 views • 2 years ago

Mandela accepts challenge, confronts MP Fadiel Adams over racism debate Activist Melisizwe Mandela has publicly accepted what he says is an indirect challenge from National Coloured Congress leader and MP Fadiel Adams to debate racism. Mandela initially challenged Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie to a public debate, says Adams took to Facebook “posturing” and defending McKenzie “more than ten times” despite claiming he was not doing so. Mandela accused Adams of being “confused” and “acting like a childish gangster fishing for clout,” adding that the MP’s remarks suggesting Mandela’s surname should keep him from commenting on national issues were “offensive” and “an embarrassment.” Mandela stressed that he had never accused McKenzie of racism, calling Adams’ claim a fabrication, and vowed to bring “history, facts and truth” to the debate. He said the exchange underscored South Africa’s need to distinguish racism from ethnic prejudice, tribalism and immaturity. “The country is watching,” Mandela warned, urging Adams to “step up or step aside.”

Mandela accepts challenge, confronts MP Fadiel Adams over racism debate Activist Melisizwe Mandela has publicly accepted what he says is an indirect challenge from National Coloured Congress leader and MP Fadiel Adams to debate racism. Mandela initially challenged Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture Gayton McKenzie to a public debate, says Adams took to Facebook “posturing” and defending McKenzie “more than ten times” despite claiming he was not doing so. Mandela accused Adams of being “confused” and “acting like a childish gangster fishing for clout,” adding that the MP’s remarks suggesting Mandela’s surname should keep him from commenting on national issues were “offensive” and “an embarrassment.” Mandela stressed that he had never accused McKenzie of racism, calling Adams’ claim a fabrication, and vowed to bring “history, facts and truth” to the debate. He said the exchange underscored South Africa’s need to distinguish racism from ethnic prejudice, tribalism and immaturity. “The country is watching,” Mandela warned, urging Adams to “step up or step aside.”

MDN NEWS

11,695 views • 1 year ago

He doesn’t know what a woman is but even worse, opposition leader Chris Hipkins apparently thinks men can become pregnant. On Morning Report today Hipkins disagreed with Casey Costello’s directive to Health Ministry officials to use the term “pregnant woman” rather than “pregnant person”. Ms Costello is a NZ First MP and Associate Health Minister in the governing coalition. She says- "It is important that we have clarity about the people we are referring to when talking about women's health. Sex-specific language ensures that women know what health services they are entitled to and can access these easily, especially for those women with English as a second language.” Sounds quite sensible. No wonder then that the perpetually confused Mr Hipkins disagrees. Really, who in their right mind could vote for such a pasty dithering example of a man?

He doesn’t know what a woman is but even worse, opposition leader Chris Hipkins apparently thinks men can become pregnant. On Morning Report today Hipkins disagreed with Casey Costello’s directive to Health Ministry officials to use the term “pregnant woman” rather than “pregnant person”. Ms Costello is a NZ First MP and Associate Health Minister in the governing coalition. She says- "It is important that we have clarity about the people we are referring to when talking about women's health. Sex-specific language ensures that women know what health services they are entitled to and can access these easily, especially for those women with English as a second language.” Sounds quite sensible. No wonder then that the perpetually confused Mr Hipkins disagrees. Really, who in their right mind could vote for such a pasty dithering example of a man?

The Redbaiter

10,450 views • 1 year ago

The Government has announced a Bill to ban conversion practices that is so poorly and broadly drafted that it could see parents, therapists and religious leaders locked up for up to five years if they engage in well-intentioned conversations with gender-confused children or dare to share their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw sits down with therapist James Esses. The Minister for Equalities, Olivia Bailey MP, claims the Bill will not stop parents and therapists from talking openly to children with identity issues. She says it only criminalises conversion practices that are abusive and cause serious harm. However, James Esses, who works with children who believe they are “trapped in the wrong body”, argues that the proposed new law puts him at risk of imprisonment. Watch the full episode below 👇

The Government has announced a Bill to ban conversion practices that is so poorly and broadly drafted that it could see parents, therapists and religious leaders locked up for up to five years if they engage in well-intentioned conversations with gender-confused children or dare to share their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw sits down with therapist James Esses. The Minister for Equalities, Olivia Bailey MP, claims the Bill will not stop parents and therapists from talking openly to children with identity issues. She says it only criminalises conversion practices that are abusive and cause serious harm. However, James Esses, who works with children who believe they are “trapped in the wrong body”, argues that the proposed new law puts him at risk of imprisonment. Watch the full episode below 👇

The Free Speech Union

48,085 views • 1 month ago

This MP appears to believe that people who identify as “asexual” are being subjected to abuse or coercion designed to make them have sex, and that “asexuality” therefore requires specific protection under the proposed conversion therapy legislation. Protected from whom, exactly? And where is the evidence that this is a widespread or significant problem? Yet when he raises the issue, he is thanked for asking an “important question”. At times, it genuinely feels as though we’re living in a lost episode of Little Britain, waiting for the scene to cut to Bubbles DeVere or Daffyd declaring: “I’m part of the asexual communiteeeeee.” We used to understand that some people simply had little or no interest in sex. We called it celibacy, low libido or simply personal preference. Which does rather raise the question of why so many new identity categories are being created, and what purpose they serve. I’m still struck by a conversation with a parent who told me her 12-year-old daughter “identified” as a lesbian, while insisting this had nothing to do with sex or sexual attraction. When I gently pointed out that being a lesbian refers to same-sex attraction - attraction to girls or women - I was accused of bigotry. That left me wondering whether I was really the person in the conversation who had a problem with homosexuality. The irony, of course, is that under the proposed conversion therapy legislation, it would likely be me - not the adult encouraging a child to adopt an identity detached from its ordinary meaning - who could find themselves accused of wrongdoing. No wonder children are confused. Many adults, including some MPs, seem even more confused.

This MP appears to believe that people who identify as “asexual” are being subjected to abuse or coercion designed to make them have sex, and that “asexuality” therefore requires specific protection under the proposed conversion therapy legislation. Protected from whom, exactly? And where is the evidence that this is a widespread or significant problem? Yet when he raises the issue, he is thanked for asking an “important question”. At times, it genuinely feels as though we’re living in a lost episode of Little Britain, waiting for the scene to cut to Bubbles DeVere or Daffyd declaring: “I’m part of the asexual communiteeeeee.” We used to understand that some people simply had little or no interest in sex. We called it celibacy, low libido or simply personal preference. Which does rather raise the question of why so many new identity categories are being created, and what purpose they serve. I’m still struck by a conversation with a parent who told me her 12-year-old daughter “identified” as a lesbian, while insisting this had nothing to do with sex or sexual attraction. When I gently pointed out that being a lesbian refers to same-sex attraction - attraction to girls or women - I was accused of bigotry. That left me wondering whether I was really the person in the conversation who had a problem with homosexuality. The irony, of course, is that under the proposed conversion therapy legislation, it would likely be me - not the adult encouraging a child to adopt an identity detached from its ordinary meaning - who could find themselves accused of wrongdoing. No wonder children are confused. Many adults, including some MPs, seem even more confused.

Janet Murray

13,332 views • 2 months ago

"These are significant voices, many of them female, which appear to be unheard by the Minns' government. Voices like those of a 14-year-old girl who likes to swim and is prepared to train hard. Her mother drops her at the pool early each morning for squad and then picks her up changed and ready to be dropped at school. Except now there are new bodies in the change room, bodies that are anatomically male bodies that are stripping and changing when she is in the dressing room and she is confused. And uncomfortable. And stopped swimming. Like so many other women have done over the years, self-edited their participation in public life." THANK YOU Liberal Party NSW MP Susan Carter for your strong defence of women's and girls' sex-based rights, and for holding Chris Minns's NSW Labor Government to account – especially its female MPs, who should understand full well the harms of allowing men to self-ID into female-only spaces, services and sports 💜💚🤍 **This is only an excerpt of Susan's 40min speech, she also made excellent comments opposing the removal of protections re prostitution and surrogacy.** #ThisIsNotEquality #NoToSelfID #NSWpol

"These are significant voices, many of them female, which appear to be unheard by the Minns' government. Voices like those of a 14-year-old girl who likes to swim and is prepared to train hard. Her mother drops her at the pool early each morning for squad and then picks her up changed and ready to be dropped at school. Except now there are new bodies in the change room, bodies that are anatomically male bodies that are stripping and changing when she is in the dressing room and she is confused. And uncomfortable. And stopped swimming. Like so many other women have done over the years, self-edited their participation in public life." THANK YOU Liberal Party NSW MP Susan Carter for your strong defence of women's and girls' sex-based rights, and for holding Chris Minns's NSW Labor Government to account – especially its female MPs, who should understand full well the harms of allowing men to self-ID into female-only spaces, services and sports 💜💚🤍 This is only an excerpt of Susan's 40min speech, she also made excellent comments opposing the removal of protections re prostitution and surrogacy. #ThisIsNotEquality #NoToSelfID #NSWpol

Rachael Wong

61,290 views • 1 year ago

🤯 Listen to this extraordinary exchange between Camilla Tominey and Labour’s Health Secretary James Murray. It is genuinely jaw-dropping. Camilla: “You’re quite pro-trans, aren’t you? Do you think a woman can have a penis? Because you did previously?” Murray: “No, I don’t.” Camilla: “So you’ve changed your mind?” Murray: “Yes.” Camilla: “Why?” Murray stumbles. He says he’s been thinking about the issue over recent years and would not now say trans women are women. Camilla hits back: “You must have known that before. You are very well educated. How on earth can you have previously thought that a woman can have a penis?” He had no real answer. Because there isn’t one. This is not some backbench MP. This is the Secretary of State for Health, the man responsible for the entire NHS, puberty blocker policy, women’s health services, and child safeguarding. He spent years either believing or pretending to believe that biological sex is fluid and that women can have penises. Only now, when the Cass Review, court rulings, and public opinion have made that position politically toxic, has he magically “changed his mind”. Think about the damage done while he held that view. The eroded women’s rights. The confused children fast-tracked toward hormones and surgery. The female prisoners and athletes forced to share spaces with biological males. All enabled or ignored by senior Labour figures like him. This level of ideological delusion at the very top of government is not just embarrassing, it is dangerous. Basic biology should never have been up for debate, let alone something a Health Secretary had to “evolve” on.

🤯 Listen to this extraordinary exchange between Camilla Tominey and Labour’s Health Secretary James Murray. It is genuinely jaw-dropping. Camilla: “You’re quite pro-trans, aren’t you? Do you think a woman can have a penis? Because you did previously?” Murray: “No, I don’t.” Camilla: “So you’ve changed your mind?” Murray: “Yes.” Camilla: “Why?” Murray stumbles. He says he’s been thinking about the issue over recent years and would not now say trans women are women. Camilla hits back: “You must have known that before. You are very well educated. How on earth can you have previously thought that a woman can have a penis?” He had no real answer. Because there isn’t one. This is not some backbench MP. This is the Secretary of State for Health, the man responsible for the entire NHS, puberty blocker policy, women’s health services, and child safeguarding. He spent years either believing or pretending to believe that biological sex is fluid and that women can have penises. Only now, when the Cass Review, court rulings, and public opinion have made that position politically toxic, has he magically “changed his mind”. Think about the damage done while he held that view. The eroded women’s rights. The confused children fast-tracked toward hormones and surgery. The female prisoners and athletes forced to share spaces with biological males. All enabled or ignored by senior Labour figures like him. This level of ideological delusion at the very top of government is not just embarrassing, it is dangerous. Basic biology should never have been up for debate, let alone something a Health Secretary had to “evolve” on.

J Stewart

2,936,031 views • 1 month ago

As we Aussies go into our festive season we get to rest easy knowing we are safe and loved because Herr Albo fucking says so. Snipers on the roof at the cricket, beefed up security and police presence to protect us because that’s what Australia has become. We import 3rd world arseholes who hate us and are surprised that they want to kill us. Dear legal firearm owners now may be the time for you to stand up unite and tell the government to fuck itself . Simply say NO we will not comply with your rushed anti Australian laws. We will not be treated as criminals because you government wankers can’t / wont/ dont want to, keep Australians safe from Islamic Extremists. Increasing the laws on any topic only works for people who respect the laws. The people who prioritise Sharia laws over Australian laws don’t give a fuck what rules you bring in they have plenty of other means to deploy terror. Dear Military men and women and police of Australia will you copy the cowards in Britain and prioritise pay masters, UN WEF and WHO terrorists over the actual people you promised to serve and protect? Will you submit and bend a knee to an ideology that will murder you just as enthusiastically as the rest of us? In a country where anyone politically to the right of Stalin is considered far right a term that no longer carries any meaning whatsoever will you allow yourselves to be deployed against the Australian people your ANZAC forebears who certainly didn’t fight and die to watch people be arrested for hurtful words, or for pricks like Anthony Albanese and Tony Burke MP to import as many Australia hating, flag burning, destruction and murder enthusiasts as possible. I can only assume that Robert Menzies is rolling in his grave at the gutless cowardly state of the Liberal Party of Australia. Islam is not a race. Government is not our friend and my Australia doesn’t need snipers on roofs at sporting matches I’ll reiterate for the super confused- I don’t give a shit about Palestine or Israel keep your shitty wars over there.

As we Aussies go into our festive season we get to rest easy knowing we are safe and loved because Herr Albo fucking says so. Snipers on the roof at the cricket, beefed up security and police presence to protect us because that’s what Australia has become. We import 3rd world arseholes who hate us and are surprised that they want to kill us. Dear legal firearm owners now may be the time for you to stand up unite and tell the government to fuck itself . Simply say NO we will not comply with your rushed anti Australian laws. We will not be treated as criminals because you government wankers can’t / wont/ dont want to, keep Australians safe from Islamic Extremists. Increasing the laws on any topic only works for people who respect the laws. The people who prioritise Sharia laws over Australian laws don’t give a fuck what rules you bring in they have plenty of other means to deploy terror. Dear Military men and women and police of Australia will you copy the cowards in Britain and prioritise pay masters, UN WEF and WHO terrorists over the actual people you promised to serve and protect? Will you submit and bend a knee to an ideology that will murder you just as enthusiastically as the rest of us? In a country where anyone politically to the right of Stalin is considered far right a term that no longer carries any meaning whatsoever will you allow yourselves to be deployed against the Australian people your ANZAC forebears who certainly didn’t fight and die to watch people be arrested for hurtful words, or for pricks like Anthony Albanese and Tony Burke MP to import as many Australia hating, flag burning, destruction and murder enthusiasts as possible. I can only assume that Robert Menzies is rolling in his grave at the gutless cowardly state of the Liberal Party of Australia. Islam is not a race. Government is not our friend and my Australia doesn’t need snipers on roofs at sporting matches I’ll reiterate for the super confused- I don’t give a shit about Palestine or Israel keep your shitty wars over there.

Dean McCrae- Freedom Chef

39,602 views • 8 months ago

🚨 EXPLOSIVE: American Trans Woman MELTS DOWN on George Galloway in SHANGHAI for Saying He’s “Socially Conservative Yet Economically Radical” Like the CCP — His Ice-Cold, Uninterrupted Response Exposes the West’s Collapsing Overton Window! 🔥 This just happened in Shanghai, China. George Galloway — former British MP, seven-time Parliamentarian, and leader of the Workers’ Party — was speaking at a night school. He described his politics as socially conservative but economically radical, explicitly comparing aspects of his values to those of the CCP. An American trans woman in the audience erupted, interrupting loudly, accusing him of pushing the Overton Window “over the edge,” labeling his comments transphobic, and claiming they feed into harm and violence against trans people in the West. The exchange turned heated as she kept interrupting and raising her voice. I caught the powerful conclusion: Galloway’s calm, uninterrupted rebuttal below. This is the clash of civilizations in real time 🇺🇸🇬🇧 vs 🇨🇳🇰🇵 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺🇩🇪🇫🇷: In the West, merely stating that sex is biological and immutable — or that one can be left-wing on economics while rejecting gender ideology — is now treated as literal violence by activists. The Overton Window has shifted so extremely that basic reality is “hate.” 🇨🇳: Meanwhile, in China (and most of the non-Western world), these positions are mainstream common sense. China’s approach to gender/sex: • Legal sex changes require documented gender-affirming surgery + strict medical/psychological criteria (typically age 20+, years of documented dysphoria, psychiatric evaluation, often unmarried status). Self-ID does not exist. • No puberty blockers or medical transitions for minors. • Schools and media do not affirm gender identity as separate from biological sex. • Activism and Pride events that disrupt social harmony and cultural norms face censorship and crackdowns. Galloway’s “socially conservative” stance on sex and gender aligns far more with Chinese policy and global majority views than with Western progressive orthodoxy. Billions of people on Earth still operate on the understanding that men cannot become women. The accusation that stating biological facts “feeds violence” is the ultimate projection. In reality, the West’s rapid shift — self-ID policies, males in female sports/prisons/spaces, medicalization of confused youth — has created its own documented harms (sports fairness losses, safety incidents in prisons, Cass Review-style evidence on youth interventions leading to restrictions in multiple countries). This moment in Shanghai is bigger than one heated exchange. It shows: 1. Western gender ideology is not universal — it’s a cultural export that looks increasingly alien abroad. 2. The Overton Window in the West has been dragged so far left that even a lifelong socialist like Galloway gets called “extreme” for holding views shared by most humans historically and globally. 3. As multipolar powers like China rise, the West’s ability to enforce its cultural dogmas shrinks. Galloway’s synthesis (radical economics + cultural realism) may be the future of effective left politics. The interrupter brought Western activism tactics to China… and discovered the rest of the world doesn’t play by those rules. Video of Galloway’s response below 👇 What do YOU think? Was this “transphobia” or just a Western activist encountering reality outside the bubble? RT if the world needs to see this clash. Constructive feedback is welcomed! 🙏 #GeorgeGalloway #Shanghai #OvertonWindow #China #TransDebate #FreeSpeech #WorkersParty

🚨 EXPLOSIVE: American Trans Woman MELTS DOWN on George Galloway in SHANGHAI for Saying He’s “Socially Conservative Yet Economically Radical” Like the CCP — His Ice-Cold, Uninterrupted Response Exposes the West’s Collapsing Overton Window! 🔥 This just happened in Shanghai, China. George Galloway — former British MP, seven-time Parliamentarian, and leader of the Workers’ Party — was speaking at a night school. He described his politics as socially conservative but economically radical, explicitly comparing aspects of his values to those of the CCP. An American trans woman in the audience erupted, interrupting loudly, accusing him of pushing the Overton Window “over the edge,” labeling his comments transphobic, and claiming they feed into harm and violence against trans people in the West. The exchange turned heated as she kept interrupting and raising her voice. I caught the powerful conclusion: Galloway’s calm, uninterrupted rebuttal below. This is the clash of civilizations in real time 🇺🇸🇬🇧 vs 🇨🇳🇰🇵 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺🇩🇪🇫🇷: In the West, merely stating that sex is biological and immutable — or that one can be left-wing on economics while rejecting gender ideology — is now treated as literal violence by activists. The Overton Window has shifted so extremely that basic reality is “hate.” 🇨🇳: Meanwhile, in China (and most of the non-Western world), these positions are mainstream common sense. China’s approach to gender/sex: • Legal sex changes require documented gender-affirming surgery + strict medical/psychological criteria (typically age 20+, years of documented dysphoria, psychiatric evaluation, often unmarried status). Self-ID does not exist. • No puberty blockers or medical transitions for minors. • Schools and media do not affirm gender identity as separate from biological sex. • Activism and Pride events that disrupt social harmony and cultural norms face censorship and crackdowns. Galloway’s “socially conservative” stance on sex and gender aligns far more with Chinese policy and global majority views than with Western progressive orthodoxy. Billions of people on Earth still operate on the understanding that men cannot become women. The accusation that stating biological facts “feeds violence” is the ultimate projection. In reality, the West’s rapid shift — self-ID policies, males in female sports/prisons/spaces, medicalization of confused youth — has created its own documented harms (sports fairness losses, safety incidents in prisons, Cass Review-style evidence on youth interventions leading to restrictions in multiple countries). This moment in Shanghai is bigger than one heated exchange. It shows: 1. Western gender ideology is not universal — it’s a cultural export that looks increasingly alien abroad. 2. The Overton Window in the West has been dragged so far left that even a lifelong socialist like Galloway gets called “extreme” for holding views shared by most humans historically and globally. 3. As multipolar powers like China rise, the West’s ability to enforce its cultural dogmas shrinks. Galloway’s synthesis (radical economics + cultural realism) may be the future of effective left politics. The interrupter brought Western activism tactics to China… and discovered the rest of the world doesn’t play by those rules. Video of Galloway’s response below 👇 What do YOU think? Was this “transphobia” or just a Western activist encountering reality outside the bubble? RT if the world needs to see this clash. Constructive feedback is welcomed! 🙏 #GeorgeGalloway #Shanghai #OvertonWindow #China #TransDebate #FreeSpeech #WorkersParty

𝐒𝐇𝐎𝐖𝐓𝐘𝐌𝐄 🇨🇳🇺🇸⚜️

37,212 views • 1 month ago