Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Congressman Eric Burlison -“I think that the intelligence community wants disclosure to happen. They just want to do it in such a way that nobody goes to jail” EB on the goal for the upcoming UFO hearings 👇🏼 “ The goal is to figure out a way to take...

disgustipated42's profile picture

neandrewthal

5,221 subscribers

15,937 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & PoliticsEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Matthew McConaughey reveals the three words his dad said that changed his life “I said dad, I don't want to go to law school anymore. I want to go to film school and after about a 5 second pause, he goes, ‘Are you sure that's what you want to do?’ I reply yes sir” “Another long pause. Then I hear, ‘Well, don't halfass it’” “I remember just beaming, hopping up just like Yes! My dad not only said okay. The way he said don't halfass it, it was also, okay. Let's go big boy. Own that shit. Get some leverage. Get some horsepower behind where you're going. Go do it” “I remember to this day and I've learned this later I think from becoming a father, part of what I believe happened to him and why he said that to me that way on that call was the way that I asked him. I wasn't really asking. It was, ‘I don't want to go to law school, Dad. I want to go to film school.’ I didn't stutter. He heard his son saying this is what I want to do” “What I think happened to him in that moment is what I think any father, any parent loves. You raise your kids in a certain way and you give them a guideline, a ladder to climb and here's the guidelines and if you do it this way, you're most likely going to have some success in life and it'll work out for you and then when we do it that way, we can be proud parents” “But what do we really want to happen when our kids are out of the house and they're on their own? We kind of want them to call one day and go, ‘I'm breaking out. I'm going my own way.’ And as a parent, we go, as much as it may scare us, we're going, ‘Yes!’ I gave my kid the confidence and the courage and the foundation to say they're going to go their own way” “In a way, I think every parent honors and loves that moment. I heard my dad, when he didn't hear me stutter, when he heard me directly say what I said. I wasn't really asking him. Even though I was out of respect asking him, the way I said it, I wasn't asking him and I think he felt that” “Don't halfass it”
2:28

Matthew McConaughey reveals the three words his dad said that changed his life “I said dad, I don't want to go to law school anymore. I want to go to film school and after about a 5 second pause, he goes, ‘Are you sure that's what you want to do?’ I reply yes sir” “Another long pause. Then I hear, ‘Well, don't halfass it’” “I remember just beaming, hopping up just like Yes! My dad not only said okay. The way he said don't halfass it, it was also, okay. Let's go big boy. Own that shit. Get some leverage. Get some horsepower behind where you're going. Go do it” “I remember to this day and I've learned this later I think from becoming a father, part of what I believe happened to him and why he said that to me that way on that call was the way that I asked him. I wasn't really asking. It was, ‘I don't want to go to law school, Dad. I want to go to film school.’ I didn't stutter. He heard his son saying this is what I want to do” “What I think happened to him in that moment is what I think any father, any parent loves. You raise your kids in a certain way and you give them a guideline, a ladder to climb and here's the guidelines and if you do it this way, you're most likely going to have some success in life and it'll work out for you and then when we do it that way, we can be proud parents” “But what do we really want to happen when our kids are out of the house and they're on their own? We kind of want them to call one day and go, ‘I'm breaking out. I'm going my own way.’ And as a parent, we go, as much as it may scare us, we're going, ‘Yes!’ I gave my kid the confidence and the courage and the foundation to say they're going to go their own way” “In a way, I think every parent honors and loves that moment. I heard my dad, when he didn't hear me stutter, when he heard me directly say what I said. I wasn't really asking him. Even though I was out of respect asking him, the way I said it, I wasn't asking him and I think he felt that” “Don't halfass it”

Jack

1,184,354 views • 2 months ago

Here's what 🇺🇸 Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone had to say about the possibility of a 400m-400m hurdles double at a meet, when asked by Eddie Pells. "'Is it possible?' is one thing. 'Do I want to do it?' is another. I think it's something that I even have to consider. I don't know if that's what I want to do. I think anything is possible. I think it's just a matter of: What are my goals? What am I setting out to do? I want to put myself in the best position possible to be the best that I can be. Those are two really hard events with really great fields. You can not discredit any of those women. That's a big undertaking. I just take it one race at a time." #WorldAthleticsChamps
0:40

Here's what 🇺🇸 Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone had to say about the possibility of a 400m-400m hurdles double at a meet, when asked by Eddie Pells. "'Is it possible?' is one thing. 'Do I want to do it?' is another. I think it's something that I even have to consider. I don't know if that's what I want to do. I think anything is possible. I think it's just a matter of: What are my goals? What am I setting out to do? I want to put myself in the best position possible to be the best that I can be. Those are two really hard events with really great fields. You can not discredit any of those women. That's a big undertaking. I just take it one race at a time." #WorldAthleticsChamps

Chris Chavez

169,590 views • 10 months ago

Jake Oettinger evaluates his 2025-26 season stating, “I don’t feel like I accomplished any of my goals”. “I want to win a Stanley Cup. I want to win the Vezina trophy, and I want to be a starting goal for team USA at the Olympics. And none of those three things happen. So I think it's important to set big goals for yourself. And obviously those are three really hard things to do, but I think I can do it. And I think when I look back at the season, I think I'm proud of the regular season I had, I think any time you go 35 and 13 year, I would take that the rest of my career, if I could. So I'm proud of the regular season I had, obviously had games I didn't like, as everyone does throughout the course of the year, but I think for the majority of it, I helped the team win and made a difference. Bu I think like there's another level that I can get to, and I have a lot of things I need to look at that I need to change and get better at if I want to achieve those goals and help this team win. I think what excites me about is that I know I can do it. I'm not asking myself something that I can't do, or people don't think I can do around me that support me and help me. So luckily for me, I have unreal coaches and great family that all wants to help me do that. They believe that I can do it.”
1:20

Jake Oettinger evaluates his 2025-26 season stating, “I don’t feel like I accomplished any of my goals”. “I want to win a Stanley Cup. I want to win the Vezina trophy, and I want to be a starting goal for team USA at the Olympics. And none of those three things happen. So I think it's important to set big goals for yourself. And obviously those are three really hard things to do, but I think I can do it. And I think when I look back at the season, I think I'm proud of the regular season I had, I think any time you go 35 and 13 year, I would take that the rest of my career, if I could. So I'm proud of the regular season I had, obviously had games I didn't like, as everyone does throughout the course of the year, but I think for the majority of it, I helped the team win and made a difference. Bu I think like there's another level that I can get to, and I have a lot of things I need to look at that I need to change and get better at if I want to achieve those goals and help this team win. I think what excites me about is that I know I can do it. I'm not asking myself something that I can't do, or people don't think I can do around me that support me and help me. So luckily for me, I have unreal coaches and great family that all wants to help me do that. They believe that I can do it.”

Abby Jones

46,587 views • 3 months ago

"If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)
7:02

"If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)

Joe Murgia

18,951 views • 4 months ago

JIMMY DERMBUDDY NUFORMULA #EverydayStrongSkinWithJimmy #jimmyyjp 💬: *the reporter asked how to handle the comments on various social media platforms* 💜: I think staying calm is the best. No matter what kind of harassment you face, it’s like playing a game. I always think of it as a game, whoever stays calmer, wins. That’s just how it is for me. I have to admit that everyone uses their phone like it’s a 33rd organ; we just can't live without it. And I admit, I can't live without my phone either. But in the end, I just think, hey, sometimes we forget, we're so deep in our phones that we feel like we aren't participating in the environment around us at all. It makes it so that, what do you call it, something inside us goes missing. They call it the "soul" disappearing. Since the soul is gone, I just felt like, hey, if you ask what I'm doing this year, one thing I can say for sure is: I will try to use my phone less. 💬: Meaning, it's the goal you set for yourself for what you'll do this year. 💜: That's right, and I feel like I've already started to achieve it. Because over the past month, I’ve started opening things less. I started trying not to read too much and things like that. And I try to focus on being in the present and try to reach the goals I've set for myself. Because I think that every time we set a goal and make it a success, it's always the case that the fans or the people who like us will come to congratulate us and be happy. And it creates inspiration or other things; it creates positive energy for people on social.
1:44

JIMMY DERMBUDDY NUFORMULA #EverydayStrongSkinWithJimmy #jimmyyjp 💬: *the reporter asked how to handle the comments on various social media platforms* 💜: I think staying calm is the best. No matter what kind of harassment you face, it’s like playing a game. I always think of it as a game, whoever stays calmer, wins. That’s just how it is for me. I have to admit that everyone uses their phone like it’s a 33rd organ; we just can't live without it. And I admit, I can't live without my phone either. But in the end, I just think, hey, sometimes we forget, we're so deep in our phones that we feel like we aren't participating in the environment around us at all. It makes it so that, what do you call it, something inside us goes missing. They call it the "soul" disappearing. Since the soul is gone, I just felt like, hey, if you ask what I'm doing this year, one thing I can say for sure is: I will try to use my phone less. 💬: Meaning, it's the goal you set for yourself for what you'll do this year. 💜: That's right, and I feel like I've already started to achieve it. Because over the past month, I’ve started opening things less. I started trying not to read too much and things like that. And I try to focus on being in the present and try to reach the goals I've set for myself. Because I think that every time we set a goal and make it a success, it's always the case that the fans or the people who like us will come to congratulate us and be happy. And it creates inspiration or other things; it creates positive energy for people on social.

mini (pepper’s babytee)࣪ ִֶָ⋆.

15,139 views • 6 months ago

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”
1:58

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

Brian Kight

38,031 views • 1 year ago

🐿️ i need to (find my own color too) 🐿️ i’m in the process of finding it 🐿️ it’s difficult, it’s difficult; finding your own thing is the hardest 🐿️ i’m thinking about the team’s music too…what should we talk about, what kind of music should we make… 🐿️ i think i’ve been having healthy thoughts 🐿️ i never think “i’m having such a hard time right now” so i think these are all just healthy thoughts about what i can do to do well, what i can do to put out things people will like, what i can do to put out cool things 🐿️ in order to do that, i’ve been trying attempting to live in patterns that i haven’t lived in before and there is an awkwardness that arises from that…i should give in a try
1:12

🐿️ i need to (find my own color too) 🐿️ i’m in the process of finding it 🐿️ it’s difficult, it’s difficult; finding your own thing is the hardest 🐿️ i’m thinking about the team’s music too…what should we talk about, what kind of music should we make… 🐿️ i think i’ve been having healthy thoughts 🐿️ i never think “i’m having such a hard time right now” so i think these are all just healthy thoughts about what i can do to do well, what i can do to put out things people will like, what i can do to put out cool things 🐿️ in order to do that, i’ve been trying attempting to live in patterns that i haven’t lived in before and there is an awkwardness that arises from that…i should give in a try

💬

56,245 views • 11 months ago

I hate constraints and bullshit rules - and just because some WWE producer says, "clear" (meaning, we are no longer live on the air and the show is over) that doesn't mean I just stop whatever I'm doing and tell everyone great job. It fucking pissed me off. I can't shut my high emotions off just because a script says we're done. But even in this crazy fucking world of pro wrestling - this is a microcosm of a larger issue I have with individuals, corporations & governments - telling us what we can or can't do. You have to do it this way, you have to say it that way, or you'll get cancelled. They create fear if you have a different perspective and don't live by their rules. It's their way, or no way. Fuck that. I say it the way I want to say it. I do it the way I want to do it. My choice. Our choice. Fuck your "clear" - Final Boss
1:26

I hate constraints and bullshit rules - and just because some WWE producer says, "clear" (meaning, we are no longer live on the air and the show is over) that doesn't mean I just stop whatever I'm doing and tell everyone great job. It fucking pissed me off. I can't shut my high emotions off just because a script says we're done. But even in this crazy fucking world of pro wrestling - this is a microcosm of a larger issue I have with individuals, corporations & governments - telling us what we can or can't do. You have to do it this way, you have to say it that way, or you'll get cancelled. They create fear if you have a different perspective and don't live by their rules. It's their way, or no way. Fuck that. I say it the way I want to say it. I do it the way I want to do it. My choice. Our choice. Fuck your "clear" - Final Boss

Dwayne Johnson

8,082,897 views • 2 years ago

Gina Carano reflects on cancellation and what she took from it: “I think I was pretty damn spot-on, to be quite honest. I think that my words were taken and twisted out of context. I just have more knowledge now of how I would have handled the circumstance five years ago if I were in the same body and mindset I’m in now. As far as regrets, I think we can always, always, always do better—but without doing things the way we do them, we don’t learn how to do those things better. There are definitely certain things in life that you should be very, very sorry for—we all have them—but we learn from them. If you don’t learn from it, then you’ll probably repeat it.”
1:16

Gina Carano reflects on cancellation and what she took from it: “I think I was pretty damn spot-on, to be quite honest. I think that my words were taken and twisted out of context. I just have more knowledge now of how I would have handled the circumstance five years ago if I were in the same body and mindset I’m in now. As far as regrets, I think we can always, always, always do better—but without doing things the way we do them, we don’t learn how to do those things better. There are definitely certain things in life that you should be very, very sorry for—we all have them—but we learn from them. If you don’t learn from it, then you’ll probably repeat it.”

Ariel Helwani

119,282 views • 3 months ago

🔥 Burlison to Trump: "Just waive [NDAs] completely for anything related to...non-human intelligence." 🔥 (Yes!!! He gets it. Burlison is one of the few Rs who will push (even if it's gently) the Trump admin on these issues. Make it right for whistleblowers like Grusch, Dylan Borland, Matthew and others.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "...the cost of pensions, their medical benefits, you know, etc. I think that, first and foremost, you got to make it right to those people. That will demonstrate to everybody else who wants to come forward that it's a safe place to come into. "And then I think what what Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is leading on is fantastic, in that making sure that the administration knows that there may be some times where these individuals who were working, you know, they were promoted into a system or a program. Sometimes...they're now inheriting things where they, where they realize, well, there's crimes involved in this. "And so, you know, they're kind of put in an awkward situation. Do they do their patriotic duty? What do they do? I think that providing some level of amnesty for them to be able to come forward is very, very important. And then, I finally think, also, that they need to waive the non-disclosure agreements on this topic. Particularly just waive it completely for anything related to the knowledge of life that's outside, you know, non-human intelligence. I mean, I don't see why we possibly should even allow that to be a top secret thing. "And so, if there's anything that's related to that, it should be waived. I think that that's what our ask is of this administration, as well as to continue digging into the private sector. I think that a lot of this information is in the in the hands of either the...or the archives of these federally-funded research and development centers and then further some of the some of the prime subs (subcontractors) that have been working on this topic. "And so I think that it's gonna take making it clear that to our major companies that we do business with, or do business with the United States, that it's okay to come forward. And I think that we're gonna have to have a discussion if they do have - if they're reverse engineering stuff that they got because it was from non-human intelligence - we need to make sure that we can have that conversation about intellectual property, so that those are the next steps."
2:05

🔥 Burlison to Trump: "Just waive [NDAs] completely for anything related to...non-human intelligence." 🔥 (Yes!!! He gets it. Burlison is one of the few Rs who will push (even if it's gently) the Trump admin on these issues. Make it right for whistleblowers like Grusch, Dylan Borland, Matthew and others.) Rep. Eric Burlison: "...the cost of pensions, their medical benefits, you know, etc. I think that, first and foremost, you got to make it right to those people. That will demonstrate to everybody else who wants to come forward that it's a safe place to come into. "And then I think what what Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is leading on is fantastic, in that making sure that the administration knows that there may be some times where these individuals who were working, you know, they were promoted into a system or a program. Sometimes...they're now inheriting things where they, where they realize, well, there's crimes involved in this. "And so, you know, they're kind of put in an awkward situation. Do they do their patriotic duty? What do they do? I think that providing some level of amnesty for them to be able to come forward is very, very important. And then, I finally think, also, that they need to waive the non-disclosure agreements on this topic. Particularly just waive it completely for anything related to the knowledge of life that's outside, you know, non-human intelligence. I mean, I don't see why we possibly should even allow that to be a top secret thing. "And so, if there's anything that's related to that, it should be waived. I think that that's what our ask is of this administration, as well as to continue digging into the private sector. I think that a lot of this information is in the in the hands of either the...or the archives of these federally-funded research and development centers and then further some of the some of the prime subs (subcontractors) that have been working on this topic. "And so I think that it's gonna take making it clear that to our major companies that we do business with, or do business with the United States, that it's okay to come forward. And I think that we're gonna have to have a discussion if they do have - if they're reverse engineering stuff that they got because it was from non-human intelligence - we need to make sure that we can have that conversation about intellectual property, so that those are the next steps."

Joe Murgia

17,289 views • 1 month ago

Q. Army course loved your solo work, I think if i see one critique, they say they wish you wrote more and that the solo album was very Western, for better or worse. Have you heard that, and what do you make of that idea? 🐰 That just happened to be my choice at the time. i could write more for my next album, if that’s what ARMYS want, but back then, i wanted something else. i wanted to get good songs and release an album as soon as i could. That's the whole reason 🐰: I also think the kind of stories I can tell are pretty limited. I said in an interview somewhere that I'd rather make up stories to tell, but I have an S in MBTI profile, so gosh, that was hard. So once in the future , I have a lot to do and say. I think it will happen naturally.
1:12

Q. Army course loved your solo work, I think if i see one critique, they say they wish you wrote more and that the solo album was very Western, for better or worse. Have you heard that, and what do you make of that idea? 🐰 That just happened to be my choice at the time. i could write more for my next album, if that’s what ARMYS want, but back then, i wanted something else. i wanted to get good songs and release an album as soon as i could. That's the whole reason 🐰: I also think the kind of stories I can tell are pretty limited. I said in an interview somewhere that I'd rather make up stories to tell, but I have an S in MBTI profile, so gosh, that was hard. So once in the future , I have a lot to do and say. I think it will happen naturally.

vjk ☆

28,747 views • 3 months ago

👤: of course ARMYs loved your solo work. if i see one critique, they say they “wish you wrote more”. and that the album was “very western”, for better or worse. have you heard that, and what do you make of that idea? 🐰: that just happened to be my choice at the time. i could write more for my next album, if that’s what ARMYS want. 🐰: but back then i wanted something else. i wanted to get good songs and release an album as soon as i could. 🐰: that’s the whole reason. i also think the kinds of stories i can tell are pretty limited. i said in an interview somewhere that id rather make up stories to tell, but i have an S in my MBTI profile. so gosh, that was hard. 🐰: so in the future, once i have a lot to do and a lot to say, i think it will happen naturally.
0:57

👤: of course ARMYs loved your solo work. if i see one critique, they say they “wish you wrote more”. and that the album was “very western”, for better or worse. have you heard that, and what do you make of that idea? 🐰: that just happened to be my choice at the time. i could write more for my next album, if that’s what ARMYS want. 🐰: but back then i wanted something else. i wanted to get good songs and release an album as soon as i could. 🐰: that’s the whole reason. i also think the kinds of stories i can tell are pretty limited. i said in an interview somewhere that id rather make up stories to tell, but i have an S in my MBTI profile. so gosh, that was hard. 🐰: so in the future, once i have a lot to do and a lot to say, i think it will happen naturally.

jungkook admirer

258,618 views • 3 months ago

🚨🎙️ William Nylander on the pressure of playing in toronto: “Yeah, I mean, I think people forget that we as players also want to win. So, I mean, I think we have our goal to want to go all the way. I’ve been playing there for a while, but I don’t know, I don’t really think about what other people say or what their opinion is on how we’re playing. We inside the locker room know what we need to do. It’s not an easy battle, you’ve got to appreciate the grind it takes when you eventually get to that point.” — SiriusXM NHL Network Radio #leafsforever
1:10

🚨🎙️ William Nylander on the pressure of playing in toronto: “Yeah, I mean, I think people forget that we as players also want to win. So, I mean, I think we have our goal to want to go all the way. I’ve been playing there for a while, but I don’t know, I don’t really think about what other people say or what their opinion is on how we’re playing. We inside the locker room know what we need to do. It’s not an easy battle, you’ve got to appreciate the grind it takes when you eventually get to that point.” — SiriusXM NHL Network Radio #leafsforever

Leafslatest

98,852 views • 11 months ago

.Naval: There was a story that I read about Elon Musk that really affected me, which was when he was talking to Bill Gates, and Bill Gates had just taken out some huge short on Tesla. It was like a billion dollar short or something. And, Elon was like, “Why would you do that? Why would you short Tesla?” And Bill goes, “Well, you know, I talked to my financial advisors and I looked at the math and there’s no way it’s overvalued. And so I’m going to make money on the short.” And Elon goes, “What do you care about making money? I thought you were into electric cars and climate change and saving the world. What are you doing trying to save a few bucks and betting against Tesla?”. And he just walked away in disgust. And I think he never talked to Bill Gates after that. And that’s when I realized, like, Elon’s a purist. He means what he says. The money is a tool for him to get what he’s trying to do. And so I take him at face value, which is the crazy thing, because a lot of people who set these audacious goals to inspire people, you kind of know they don’t really mean it. Elon, I take at face value. So I really do think he intends to get to Mars. I don’t think he’s joking about that. And I think he means to get there within a defined window of time. And I don’t think it’s just like an inspirational, faraway goal. I think he’s very, very concretely going to do whatever it takes. Because Elon doesn’t want to go down in history as the electric car guy or even the guy who saved America guy. He wants to go down as a guy who got humanity to the stars. Again, I’ll give him more credit than that. I don’t even think he wants to go down as the “I got humanity to the stars” guy. He’s just like, “I want to get to the stars, and so I have to make it happen in this lifetime. The only way that I get to experience the science fiction world in my head is if I get to the stars.” And so that’s so inspirational. I think that drives everything. So I think the government was just a thing that got in his way.
1:42

.Naval: There was a story that I read about Elon Musk that really affected me, which was when he was talking to Bill Gates, and Bill Gates had just taken out some huge short on Tesla. It was like a billion dollar short or something. And, Elon was like, “Why would you do that? Why would you short Tesla?” And Bill goes, “Well, you know, I talked to my financial advisors and I looked at the math and there’s no way it’s overvalued. And so I’m going to make money on the short.” And Elon goes, “What do you care about making money? I thought you were into electric cars and climate change and saving the world. What are you doing trying to save a few bucks and betting against Tesla?”. And he just walked away in disgust. And I think he never talked to Bill Gates after that. And that’s when I realized, like, Elon’s a purist. He means what he says. The money is a tool for him to get what he’s trying to do. And so I take him at face value, which is the crazy thing, because a lot of people who set these audacious goals to inspire people, you kind of know they don’t really mean it. Elon, I take at face value. So I really do think he intends to get to Mars. I don’t think he’s joking about that. And I think he means to get there within a defined window of time. And I don’t think it’s just like an inspirational, faraway goal. I think he’s very, very concretely going to do whatever it takes. Because Elon doesn’t want to go down in history as the electric car guy or even the guy who saved America guy. He wants to go down as a guy who got humanity to the stars. Again, I’ll give him more credit than that. I don’t even think he wants to go down as the “I got humanity to the stars” guy. He’s just like, “I want to get to the stars, and so I have to make it happen in this lifetime. The only way that I get to experience the science fiction world in my head is if I get to the stars.” And so that’s so inspirational. I think that drives everything. So I think the government was just a thing that got in his way.

Arjun Khemani

2,736,269 views • 1 year ago

Would you consider granting clemency or a pardon to Hunter Biden? Trump: I don't think it's appropriate for me to talk about it. I think it's a tragic story. You want to know the truth? And I felt that with Hillary Clinton, too. You know, with Hillary Clinton, I could have done things to her that would have made your head spin. I thought it was a very bad thing. Take the wife of a president of the United States and put her in jail. And then I see the way they treat me. That's the way it goes. But I was very protective of her. Nobody would understand that, but I was. I think my people understand it. They used to say, lock her up. Lock her up. And I'd say, just relax, please. We won the election. I think it would be very. I think it would have been horrible for our country.
2:25

Would you consider granting clemency or a pardon to Hunter Biden? Trump: I don't think it's appropriate for me to talk about it. I think it's a tragic story. You want to know the truth? And I felt that with Hillary Clinton, too. You know, with Hillary Clinton, I could have done things to her that would have made your head spin. I thought it was a very bad thing. Take the wife of a president of the United States and put her in jail. And then I see the way they treat me. That's the way it goes. But I was very protective of her. Nobody would understand that, but I was. I think my people understand it. They used to say, lock her up. Lock her up. And I'd say, just relax, please. We won the election. I think it would be very. I think it would have been horrible for our country.

Simon Ateba

3,213,377 views • 2 years ago

🔥👽 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 👽🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP/Matt Laslo Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or something different than humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?)
0:52

🔥👽 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 👽🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP/Matt Laslo Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or something different than humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?)

Joe Murgia

61,264 views • 3 months ago

🔥 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?
0:24

🔥 Congressman: I'd Risk Prison to Tell Americans This Truth About UFOs and Non-Human Intelligence 🔥 "That is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." ~Rep. Eric Burlison (The next question: What else would you risk prison over when it comes to certain truths about the UFO phenomenon?) From the @AskaPol_UAP Discord interview with Rep. Burlison on January 18th, 2024, with help from 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 🎹 📷 📻📺🎛️🚴‍♂️🌲🐈.) Q: If you learned that a non-human intelligence (NHI) and the U.S government have had an agreement in place where the NHI could abduct and conduct experiments on American citizens in exchange for NHI technology, how would you react? Rep. Eric Burlison: "Yeah, if that existed, if I discovered that, I don't care what it would mean to me, personally. I mean, even if it meant that I would be violating the...my clearance, what I learned in a secret setting. I...that is such a disturbing thing that I think that it'd be worthy to go to jail over to tell the public." (OK, that's brave of him. But what if, while visiting one or more of the locations he's supposed visit in the near future, Rep. Burlison discovered proof that the USG (or a contractor) had craft made by non-humans (or humans as we understand them) and/or had the bodies of the pilots/occupants that were determined to be non-human? If he was told to keep that quiet, would he say, "F**k that, the world deserves to know this and I'm telling everybody!" and risk prison? Or, would he do what he's told and shut his mouth? What if he saw proof that Reptilians or Greys were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw proof that abductions were real? Would he risk prison for that? What if he saw unequivocal proof that there was another intelligence on this planet with us? Would he risk prison for that? What if someone demonstrated technology to Rep. Burlison that took him to another star system and could change life on this planet for billions of humans in a positive way? Would he risk prison for that? We can go on and on with hypotheticals. Where's the line?

Joe Murgia

12,075 views • 3 months ago

Mark Levin: "[On] the murder of our friend Charlie Kirk…what do you think happened there?" Joe Kent: "What I know is that there were foreign leads that we didn't get the chance to look into, that we did not thoroughly investigate." Levin: "You have a country in mind?" Kent: "No. I think we need to fully investigate the potential of any foreign nexus." Levin: "So you think a foreign country may have been involved in his assassination? Does the FBI think that?" Kent: "What I think is that we need to thoroughly investigate all the potentials…I just can't get into it because it's classified… What I saw at the National Counterterrorism Center, that was not thoroughly looked into."
1:33

Mark Levin: "[On] the murder of our friend Charlie Kirk…what do you think happened there?" Joe Kent: "What I know is that there were foreign leads that we didn't get the chance to look into, that we did not thoroughly investigate." Levin: "You have a country in mind?" Kent: "No. I think we need to fully investigate the potential of any foreign nexus." Levin: "So you think a foreign country may have been involved in his assassination? Does the FBI think that?" Kent: "What I think is that we need to thoroughly investigate all the potentials…I just can't get into it because it's classified… What I saw at the National Counterterrorism Center, that was not thoroughly looked into."

Cesspool

280,914 views • 4 months ago

I've never heard of a head coach seeking out an MMA coach to learn about their communication strategy between rounds and during a fight. Really insightful. "I think communication can be distracting. I ask Eric Nicksick a lot about what his communication is during the round. There's a timeout component in communication, but also in-game communication... I think one of the hardest things in coaching is to relay, in a simple way, what you see to the players so that they could see it simply and execute. I think Eric does a great job of that." - Joe Mazzulla
1:22

I've never heard of a head coach seeking out an MMA coach to learn about their communication strategy between rounds and during a fight. Really insightful. "I think communication can be distracting. I ask Eric Nicksick a lot about what his communication is during the round. There's a timeout component in communication, but also in-game communication... I think one of the hardest things in coaching is to relay, in a simple way, what you see to the players so that they could see it simply and execute. I think Eric does a great job of that." - Joe Mazzulla

Ariel Helwani

53,043 views • 20 days ago

🚨Naval Ravikant on Elon Musk: "Elon is the real deal. There's a story I read about him that affected me. Bill Gates had just taken out a big short on Tesla and Elon said 'Why would you do that?' Bill said he spoke to his financial advisors and they said it made sense. Elon said 'What do you need money for? I thought you cared about climate, etc. What are you doing?' and then he walked away in disgust and never talked to Bill Gates after that. Elon's a purist, he means what he says. The money is a tool for him to do what he wants to do. I take him at face value. I really believe he intends to get to Mars, that's not a joke. And he means to get there within a defined window of time. I don't think that's an inspirational goal, I think he'll do whatever it takes. Elon doesn't want to go down in history as the electric car guy, or the 'I saved America' guy, he wants to go down as the guy who got humanity to the stars. I don't even think he even wants to be known as that, I think he actually just wants to do it because he wants to do it. The only way he gets to experience the science fiction world in his head is if he gets to the stars. I think the Government was just a thing that got in his way, and he needs to get it out of his way so he can go to the stars."
2:58

🚨Naval Ravikant on Elon Musk: "Elon is the real deal. There's a story I read about him that affected me. Bill Gates had just taken out a big short on Tesla and Elon said 'Why would you do that?' Bill said he spoke to his financial advisors and they said it made sense. Elon said 'What do you need money for? I thought you cared about climate, etc. What are you doing?' and then he walked away in disgust and never talked to Bill Gates after that. Elon's a purist, he means what he says. The money is a tool for him to do what he wants to do. I take him at face value. I really believe he intends to get to Mars, that's not a joke. And he means to get there within a defined window of time. I don't think that's an inspirational goal, I think he'll do whatever it takes. Elon doesn't want to go down in history as the electric car guy, or the 'I saved America' guy, he wants to go down as the guy who got humanity to the stars. I don't even think he even wants to be known as that, I think he actually just wants to do it because he wants to do it. The only way he gets to experience the science fiction world in his head is if he gets to the stars. I think the Government was just a thing that got in his way, and he needs to get it out of his way so he can go to the stars."

Autism Capital 🧩

1,205,043 views • 1 year ago