Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Connect your coding agents to AI Gateway with a single command. • Auto-configure 8 popular coding harnesses • 300+ models from 30+ providers, no markup • Open-weight models with ZDR & US inference ▲ ~/ vercel ai-gateway coding-agents setup

131,098 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

18 Comments

Yaw Boateng's profile picture
Yaw Boateng1 month ago

thank you @31Carlton7 😩

Muneeb ur Rehman's profile picture
Muneeb ur Rehman1 month ago

This is a huge step toward making coding agents more flexible. Being able to switch between 300+ models and providers without reconfiguring everything could make agent workflows much smoother.

AI Research & Applications's profile picture
AI Research & Applications1 month ago

The setup is the easy part. The real win is giving teams one place to compare model behavior and cost.

Dunna Avinash's profile picture
Dunna Avinash1 month ago

One-command harness setup plus a broad model and provider surface is a strong ergonomics win. No markup also makes cost behavior easier to reason about in the dev loop.

Jason Fleagle's profile picture
Jason Fleagle1 month ago

Can the setup preserve one policy and evidence layer across all eight harnesses and 300-plus models: data residency, retention, budget, fallback rules, tool permissions, evaluation results, and per-task routing reason? Easy connection is strongest with portable controls.

Yash Agrawal's profile picture
Yash Agrawal1 month ago

I am not able use any model which is not in this list like, grok-4.6, gemini-3.7-flash, meta/muse-glimmer-30b, deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813

9h0st's profile picture
9h0st1 month ago

AI Gateway 对 coding agents 的价值在于统一模型入口、成本和权限边界,否则每个工具各配一套密钥会很难管。

Fajar M Reza's profile picture
Fajar M Reza1 month ago

Model gateways simplify harness setup, but routing quality still determines developer experience.

Pi's profile picture
Pi1 month ago

Huh? Why?

Bart R. McDonough's profile picture
Bart R. McDonough1 month ago

Show me the diff before one command rewrites eight harnesses.

Johnny Cage's profile picture
Johnny Cage1 month ago

@grok what does this do

Rashed Al Mansoori's profile picture
Rashed Al Mansoori1 month ago

The config switch is the real leverage here. If the same harness can move between providers without redoing project setup, teams can route by task or fail over during an outage instead of binding the workflow to one model.

Carbon's profile picture
Carbon1 month ago

the no markup part is honestly the bit that got my attention lol

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB's profile picture
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB1 month ago

一条命令配好八个框架,省事不少。

❄️'s profile picture
❄️1 month ago

DOING ANYTHING BUT FIXING REV AND THE SITES MOBILE RESPONSIVENESS

Sebastian Buzdugan's profile picture
Sebastian Buzdugan1 month ago

i've seen provider failover change tool-call behavior enough to break coding agents mid-task

Neel Samadder's profile picture
Neel Samadder1 month ago

One-command setup is useful because it makes experimentation cheaper. The next test is whether teams can inspect and version the configuration when a harness or model changes.

Checks's profile picture
Checks1 month ago

Less setup, more building.

Related Videos