Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Connect your coding agents to AI Gateway with a single command. • Auto-configure 8 popular coding harnesses • 300+ models from 30+ providers, no markup • Open-weight models with ZDR & US inference ▲ ~/ vercel ai-gateway coding-agents setup

131,098 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 18

Фото профиля Yaw Boateng
Yaw Boateng1 месяц назад

thank you @31Carlton7 😩

Фото профиля Muneeb ur Rehman
Muneeb ur Rehman1 месяц назад

This is a huge step toward making coding agents more flexible. Being able to switch between 300+ models and providers without reconfiguring everything could make agent workflows much smoother.

Фото профиля AI Research & Applications
AI Research & Applications1 месяц назад

The setup is the easy part. The real win is giving teams one place to compare model behavior and cost.

Фото профиля Dunna Avinash
Dunna Avinash1 месяц назад

One-command harness setup plus a broad model and provider surface is a strong ergonomics win. No markup also makes cost behavior easier to reason about in the dev loop.

Фото профиля Jason Fleagle
Jason Fleagle1 месяц назад

Can the setup preserve one policy and evidence layer across all eight harnesses and 300-plus models: data residency, retention, budget, fallback rules, tool permissions, evaluation results, and per-task routing reason? Easy connection is strongest with portable controls.

Фото профиля Yash Agrawal
Yash Agrawal1 месяц назад

I am not able use any model which is not in this list like, grok-4.6, gemini-3.7-flash, meta/muse-glimmer-30b, deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813

Фото профиля 9h0st
9h0st1 месяц назад

AI Gateway 对 coding agents 的价值在于统一模型入口、成本和权限边界,否则每个工具各配一套密钥会很难管。

Фото профиля Fajar M Reza
Fajar M Reza1 месяц назад

Model gateways simplify harness setup, but routing quality still determines developer experience.

Фото профиля Pi
Pi1 месяц назад

Huh? Why?

Фото профиля Bart R. McDonough
Bart R. McDonough1 месяц назад

Show me the diff before one command rewrites eight harnesses.

Фото профиля Johnny Cage
Johnny Cage1 месяц назад

@grok what does this do

Фото профиля Rashed Al Mansoori
Rashed Al Mansoori1 месяц назад

The config switch is the real leverage here. If the same harness can move between providers without redoing project setup, teams can route by task or fail over during an outage instead of binding the workflow to one model.

Фото профиля Carbon
Carbon1 месяц назад

the no markup part is honestly the bit that got my attention lol

Фото профиля 安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB1 месяц назад

一条命令配好八个框架,省事不少。

Фото профиля ❄️
❄️1 месяц назад

DOING ANYTHING BUT FIXING REV AND THE SITES MOBILE RESPONSIVENESS

Фото профиля Sebastian Buzdugan
Sebastian Buzdugan1 месяц назад

i've seen provider failover change tool-call behavior enough to break coding agents mid-task

Фото профиля Neel Samadder
Neel Samadder1 месяц назад

One-command setup is useful because it makes experimentation cheaper. The next test is whether teams can inspect and version the configuration when a harness or model changes.

Фото профиля Checks
Checks1 месяц назад

Less setup, more building.

Похожие видео