正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Connect your coding agents to AI Gateway with a single command. • Auto-configure 8 popular coding harnesses • 300+ models from 30+ providers, no markup • Open-weight models with ZDR & US inference ▲ ~/ vercel ai-gateway coding-agents setup

131,098 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

Yaw Boateng 的头像
Yaw Boateng1 个月前

thank you @31Carlton7 😩

Muneeb ur Rehman 的头像
Muneeb ur Rehman1 个月前

This is a huge step toward making coding agents more flexible. Being able to switch between 300+ models and providers without reconfiguring everything could make agent workflows much smoother.

AI Research & Applications 的头像
AI Research & Applications1 个月前

The setup is the easy part. The real win is giving teams one place to compare model behavior and cost.

Dunna Avinash 的头像
Dunna Avinash1 个月前

One-command harness setup plus a broad model and provider surface is a strong ergonomics win. No markup also makes cost behavior easier to reason about in the dev loop.

Jason Fleagle 的头像
Jason Fleagle1 个月前

Can the setup preserve one policy and evidence layer across all eight harnesses and 300-plus models: data residency, retention, budget, fallback rules, tool permissions, evaluation results, and per-task routing reason? Easy connection is strongest with portable controls.

Yash Agrawal 的头像
Yash Agrawal1 个月前

I am not able use any model which is not in this list like, grok-4.6, gemini-3.7-flash, meta/muse-glimmer-30b, deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813

9h0st 的头像
9h0st1 个月前

AI Gateway 对 coding agents 的价值在于统一模型入口、成本和权限边界,否则每个工具各配一套密钥会很难管。

Fajar M Reza 的头像
Fajar M Reza1 个月前

Model gateways simplify harness setup, but routing quality still determines developer experience.

Pi 的头像
Pi1 个月前

Huh? Why?

Bart R. McDonough 的头像
Bart R. McDonough1 个月前

Show me the diff before one command rewrites eight harnesses.

Johnny Cage 的头像
Johnny Cage1 个月前

@grok what does this do

Rashed Al Mansoori 的头像
Rashed Al Mansoori1 个月前

The config switch is the real leverage here. If the same harness can move between providers without redoing project setup, teams can route by task or fail over during an outage instead of binding the workflow to one model.

Carbon 的头像
Carbon1 个月前

the no markup part is honestly the bit that got my attention lol

安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB 的头像
安叫兽|Bird🕊️ 🔶 BNB1 个月前

一条命令配好八个框架,省事不少。

❄️ 的头像
❄️1 个月前

DOING ANYTHING BUT FIXING REV AND THE SITES MOBILE RESPONSIVENESS

Sebastian Buzdugan 的头像
Sebastian Buzdugan1 个月前

i've seen provider failover change tool-call behavior enough to break coding agents mid-task

Neel Samadder 的头像
Neel Samadder1 个月前

One-command setup is useful because it makes experimentation cheaper. The next test is whether teams can inspect and version the configuration when a harness or model changes.

Checks 的头像
Checks1 个月前

Less setup, more building.

相关视频