Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

"CONSENT MATTERS"

arohi_d04's profile picture

Arohi 🎀

14,010 subscribers

19,339 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

People often assume BDSM is defined by pain. It isn't. Technique matters. Physics matters. Consent matters. Education matters.
1:02

Sensitive content

People often assume BDSM is defined by pain. It isn't. Technique matters. Physics matters. Consent matters. Education matters.

Domina Elara

45,906 次观看 • 7 天前

Is it only Nationalist consent which matters to the Secretary of State? #JimAllister #TUV
1:12

Is it only Nationalist consent which matters to the Secretary of State? #JimAllister #TUV

Jim Allister

16,503 次观看 • 6 个月前

I think the concept of consent is coming from the corporate world, where married women get into relationships with other men, and then at night tell their husbands “no means no… consent matters.”
0:36

I think the concept of consent is coming from the corporate world, where married women get into relationships with other men, and then at night tell their husbands “no means no… consent matters.”

Wizard

13,836 次观看 • 4 个月前

Consent matters because it makes every moment safe, honest and comfortable for both people. When you ask, you give the other person choice, respect and control.
0:42

Consent matters because it makes every moment safe, honest and comfortable for both people. When you ask, you give the other person choice, respect and control.

Dex

33,920 次观看 • 5 个月前

Making love regularly does more than strengthen connection. Research links healthy intimacy to better mood, lower stress, improved sleep, and heart health. Frequency matters less than consent, comfort, and connection.
1:15

Making love regularly does more than strengthen connection. Research links healthy intimacy to better mood, lower stress, improved sleep, and heart health. Frequency matters less than consent, comfort, and connection.

Metabolic Factor

80,943 次观看 • 6 个月前

No warrant means no lawful entry. The doorway is a legal boundary. Cops can’t cross it without consent or a warrant.Authority must be proven on paper. That’s why the evidence was suppressed, procedure still matters.
1:52

No warrant means no lawful entry. The doorway is a legal boundary. Cops can’t cross it without consent or a warrant.Authority must be proven on paper. That’s why the evidence was suppressed, procedure still matters.

Police The Police 2.0

88,685 次观看 • 4 个月前

Baroness Gerada, former president of the Royal College of GPs, says assisted dying must put the dying person at the heart of the process: “What matters is capacity, choice and informed consent, not physical proximity.”
0:57

Baroness Gerada, former president of the Royal College of GPs, says assisted dying must put the dying person at the heart of the process: “What matters is capacity, choice and informed consent, not physical proximity.”

Dignity in Dying

90,351 次观看 • 5 个月前

Volker: Peace needs Russia’s consent, and they won’t agree. Even if Moscow accepts terms today, it will demand more tomorrow. There is always more. Keeping the US, Ukraine, and Europe aligned matters, but it won’t produce peace. 1/
0:36

Volker: Peace needs Russia’s consent, and they won’t agree. Even if Moscow accepts terms today, it will demand more tomorrow. There is always more. Keeping the US, Ukraine, and Europe aligned matters, but it won’t produce peace. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

19,863 次观看 • 6 个月前

Oireachtas Health Committee 19/6/25 The treatment of children with dysplasia and scoliosis related matters. Constant reluctance to disclose information - Pádraig Rice TD Was there informed consent?? A philosophy among consultants led to a higher rate of hip surgeries #CHI #HipScandal #Scoliosis #Children
10:01

Oireachtas Health Committee 19/6/25 The treatment of children with dysplasia and scoliosis related matters. Constant reluctance to disclose information - Pádraig Rice TD Was there informed consent?? A philosophy among consultants led to a higher rate of hip surgeries #CHI #HipScandal #Scoliosis #Children

Mick Caul

17,498 次观看 • 1 年前

When women refuse to consent to having men in our spaces and sport we are dismissed as bigots. This is unjust. Our privacy, dignity and safety matters. Help me defend our sex-based rights in #Seanad2025 Vote Sandra Adams No. 1 NUI Seanad election.
0:51

When women refuse to consent to having men in our spaces and sport we are dismissed as bigots. This is unjust. Our privacy, dignity and safety matters. Help me defend our sex-based rights in #Seanad2025 Vote Sandra Adams No. 1 NUI Seanad election.

Sandra Adams

26,324 次观看 • 1 年前

She told the doctor, “Don’t write that in my file.” The doctor did anyway. That data can now be legally shared with 2.2 million entities without her consent. Doctor-patient privacy matters. Where did it go, and why did we let it disappear?
7:44

She told the doctor, “Don’t write that in my file.” The doctor did anyway. That data can now be legally shared with 2.2 million entities without her consent. Doctor-patient privacy matters. Where did it go, and why did we let it disappear?

Naomi Brockwell priv/acc

27,247 次观看 • 3 个月前

📡 Post Malone told Joe Rogan he stopped using cannabis because it caused depersonalization, it hit hard. What’s even harder? He doesn’t realize THC itself is a documented trigger for this condition—and the effects can last for years. This isn’t about fear. It’s about informed consent. Science matters. Protect your brain. 🧠 Every Brain Matters. 🧪 Source: #everybrainmatters #THC #cannabis #education Joe Rogan Podcast News Post Malone Joe Rogan
2:24

📡 Post Malone told Joe Rogan he stopped using cannabis because it caused depersonalization, it hit hard. What’s even harder? He doesn’t realize THC itself is a documented trigger for this condition—and the effects can last for years. This isn’t about fear. It’s about informed consent. Science matters. Protect your brain. 🧠 Every Brain Matters. 🧪 Source: #everybrainmatters #THC #cannabis #education Joe Rogan Podcast News Post Malone Joe Rogan

🌎 Every Brain Matters 🧠

65,025 次观看 • 6 个月前

Writer Informed Consent Matters (Miri AF) says the highly publicised Lucy Connolly is not a political prisoner but an actor for the State. Connolly's high profile supporters say she's a victim, contribute to her fund and buy a mug! Taken from Ep. 117 Wake Up With Sonia Poulton & Guests. Full conversation & show available here:
12:36

Writer Informed Consent Matters (Miri AF) says the highly publicised Lucy Connolly is not a political prisoner but an actor for the State. Connolly's high profile supporters say she's a victim, contribute to her fund and buy a mug! Taken from Ep. 117 Wake Up With Sonia Poulton & Guests. Full conversation & show available here:

Sonia Poulton

57,794 次观看 • 1 年前

A message from mothers to every mother. Secretary Kennedy has launched a bold, nationwide initiative to uncover the cause of autism. These mothers share what happened to their children—and why this mission matters now more than ever. Do you believe they have a right to know what happened? #KennedyforCause #CauseofAutism #BelieveMothers #FindTheCause #RealStories Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network MAHAAction
4:45

A message from mothers to every mother. Secretary Kennedy has launched a bold, nationwide initiative to uncover the cause of autism. These mothers share what happened to their children—and why this mission matters now more than ever. Do you believe they have a right to know what happened? #KennedyforCause #CauseofAutism #BelieveMothers #FindTheCause #RealStories Del Bigtree ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network MAHAAction

The HighWire

431,658 次观看 • 1 年前

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.
13:27

No One Gave Informed Consent for the COVID Vaccines and Here Is Why FREEDOM - HEALTH - HAPPINESS This podcast is highly addictive and seriously good for your health. SUPPORT DOC MALIK To listen to the full episode, have access to bonus content, back catalogue, and monthly Live Streams, please subscribe to either: The paid Spotify subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ The paid Substack subscription here: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Thank you to all the new subscribers for your lovely messages and reviews! And a big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and supporting the show! Dear reader and listener On the 14th of January, 2026, I posted on X that no one who received an mRNA COVID jab gave informed consent. Not one of the billions. Not one jab. No one ever received true informed consent from their clinicians. This is one of the scandals of the century. Mass global coercion, battery, and assault. A doctor, Neil Stone, who I believe works at University College London Hospital, replied publicly saying that he gave informed consent and was happy with his decision. I am unable to respond to him directly as he has blocked me. I invited him openly to come on my show to discuss this. He has not replied. This response highlights a fundamental problem. Many people believe informed consent simply means that they personally agreed to something. That is not what informed consent is. So what does a lack of informed consent actually mean? For some, the discussion begins and ends with coercion and mandates. While these are critical, this framing is incomplete. Informed consent is a broad umbrella term, and its failure begins long before coercion enters the picture. Informed consent is invalid if there is not full and transparent information given to the patient about what is being offered. This includes incomplete or withheld information about ingredients, mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, risks, and known complications of a medical drug or intervention. Consent cannot be informed if there are no proper studies, inadequate placebo controls, or if long term safety data is unavailable at the point consent is sought. You cannot meaningfully consent to unknown risks, particularly when uncertainty is downplayed or concealed. Informed consent also fails when alternatives are not clearly presented. This includes non pharmaceutical options and, critically, the option to do nothing. That option must be respected without judgement or pressure. If only one pathway is framed as acceptable, consent becomes performative rather than genuine. The problem is compounded when people are denied time and space to decide. Artificial urgency, emergency framing, and pressure to act quickly undermine reflection and strip individuals of agency. There is also the issue of power imbalance. When institutions, regulators, and clinicians present themselves as unquestionable authorities, people often defer rather than decide. The science is settled. I am the science. Deference is not consent. Another fundamental failure is the withholding or minimisation of uncertainty. Presenting evolving or contested science as settled fact is deceptive. Censorship of dissenting viewpoints is wrong. Silencing doctors and experts who raise legitimate concerns is wrong. Failing to disclose conflicts of interest, whether financial, institutional, or career based, invalidates consent. Language matters. Framing effects, emotionally loaded messaging, and repeated slogans shape behaviour without engaging understanding. Risk comparisons without context, lack of stratification by age or health, and one size fits all recommendations distort decision making. Informed consent is also undermined when personal risk assessment is ignored. When individual circumstances are dismissed and people are treated as a homogeneous mass, consent becomes generic and hollow. Information overload can be just as manipulative as information suppression. Dumping charts, bar graphs, and hazard colours designed to instil fear does not create understanding. It creates compliance. Then there is moral pressure. Appeals to guilt, duty, protecting others, or doing things for the greater good shift decisions from personal autonomy to social compliance. Saving granny is not informed consent. Ethical consent must be free from moral coercion. Consent does not end at the moment of agreement. If adverse outcomes occur and are denied, dismissed, or unsupported, the consent process was incomplete. Gaslighting patients is not ethical. True informed consent includes accountability after the fact. Changing definitions mid process also invalidates consent. Redefining efficacy, safety, immunity, or even what constitutes a vaccine after consent has been given is a breach of trust. Finally, informed consent collapses entirely in environments dominated by propaganda, censorship, behavioural manipulation, and social punishment for dissent. When debate is suppressed and alternative views are stigmatised, compliance replaces consent. Taken together, informed consent is not a signature on a form. It is a process. When information is incomplete, uncertainty is hidden, alternatives are denied, pressure is applied, incentives are offered, risks are minimised, dissent is censored, and power is asymmetrical, consent is not informed, even if it is technically recorded. This matters because informed consent is not a bureaucratic hurdle. It is the ethical foundation of medicine. When that foundation is eroded, what replaces it is not care, but control. The last few years have shown a complete dereliction of duty by the vast majority of doctors, I would argue 99.99 percent, who disregarded informed consent, a central pillar of medical ethics. They are not alone. Public health officials, regulators, lecturers in ethics, and academic institutions have also torn up what it means to practise ethically. It is clear to me that a Marxist ideology has infiltrated academia, science, and medicine. Collectivism and the so called greater good are placed above the individual. In this framework, autonomy becomes secondary, the individual becomes expendable, and informed consent is treated as an inconvenience rather than a necessity. In such a world, there is no real place for informed consent. Only compliance. I do not know of any other doctors who regularly talk about informed consent. I only started doing so a few years ago. Elizabeth Hart, however, has been campaigning tirelessly for years. It has been a lonely journey, and one for which she receives little to no credit, not that she is asking for it. It has been frustrating for both of us that so few doctors, and so few so called freedom dissidents, have been willing to engage seriously with what is arguably one of the biggest scandals of our time, the widespread absence of informed consent. The truth is, the lack of informed consent goes far beyond the COVID vaccines. It extends beyond childhood vaccines and even veterinary vaccines. Where is the informed consent for the policies being implemented under the banner of the so called climate crisis? Where is the informed consent for how our tax money is spent, for government policies, for legislation, and for the wars waged in our name? In all of these areas, decisions are made for populations, not with them. Consent is assumed, compliance is expected, and dissent is treated as a problem to be managed rather than a voice to be heard. Much love Doc Malik IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONSULTATION SERVICE In a world of rushed 7-minute consultations and endless referrals, I offer you something rare: time, context, and clear guidance. As your health advocate, I can help you: Understand your diagnosis and decode medical jargon Break down treatment plans in plain, easy to understand non jargon English Prepare for surgery, understand your risks, obtain true informed consent, and optimise yourself pre-op Recover from surgery, advise you how to heal faster and quicker and minimise post-op complications Manage chronic illness with lifestyle, mindset, and dietary changes Explore holistic options that complement conventional care Implement lifestyle changes like fasting, stress reduction, or movement Ask better questions, and get real answers Get an unbiased second opinion Ready to Take Control? If you're navigating a health concern, preparing for a big decision, or simply want to feel more confident in your path forward, I’d love to support you. Book here ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Because it’s your body, your life, and your future. Let’s make sure you’re informed and heard. Seagreen If you want to support your health naturally, I highly recommend trying Sea Greens, a rich source of bioavailable iodine and trace minerals that nourish thyroid function, balance hormones, and provide a clean daily boost from wild ocean plants. Use the code DOCMALIK ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Heracles Wellness Sauna Heracles Wellness is a UK-based company and supporter of the show. They offer a fantastic range of beautifully crafted saunas and cold plunge systems, perfect for creating your own healing sanctuary at home. Use the code DOCMALIK3 at checkout to get 3% off all products. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ IMPORTANT NOTICE If you value my podcasts, please support the show so that I can continue to speak up by choosing one or both of the following options - ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ If you want to make a one-off donation.

Doc Malik

11,932 次观看 • 6 个月前

John Campbell drops a chilling question about the UK's solar radiation management experiments Who gave consent? Who will control how much sunlight reaches Earth — and therefore how much food we can grow? "SRM dims sunlight. All agriculture depends on solar radiation. If you control food, you control everything. Hungry people will do anything for food." No one asked us. Not me. Not you. Not anyone in the US, Canada, or Australia. Thread: Why this matters — and what’s really at stake
1:25

John Campbell drops a chilling question about the UK's solar radiation management experiments Who gave consent? Who will control how much sunlight reaches Earth — and therefore how much food we can grow? "SRM dims sunlight. All agriculture depends on solar radiation. If you control food, you control everything. Hungry people will do anything for food." No one asked us. Not me. Not you. Not anyone in the US, Canada, or Australia. Thread: Why this matters — and what’s really at stake

Camus

163,614 次观看 • 6 个月前

Responding to a comment about vaginal atrophy in transgender female to male and why biology matters when you choose the path of transition. Testosterone will create problems and if you do not understand this how are you making informed consent as well how can a child make these choices when they have barely lived life. Keep calling me transphobic all you want you just prove how toxic and off the wall the “ trans” community has become… GENDER AFFIRMING CARE IS NOT CARE
2:38

Responding to a comment about vaginal atrophy in transgender female to male and why biology matters when you choose the path of transition. Testosterone will create problems and if you do not understand this how are you making informed consent as well how can a child make these choices when they have barely lived life. Keep calling me transphobic all you want you just prove how toxic and off the wall the “ trans” community has become… GENDER AFFIRMING CARE IS NOT CARE

Buck Angel Transsexual

14,943 次观看 • 22 天前

When I was 17, my OB/GYN said I had “labia hypertrophy,” which means “excessive” labia minora. So when I turned 18, he completely amputated my labia minora, amputated the frenulum, and cut into my clitoris without my consent and damaged the nerves. After that, other OB/GYNs confidently told me the loss of sensation and inability to orgasm was all in my head and that I looked normal. This is why I campaign for the nerve anatomy to be taught and is also why I think knowing what normal anatomy looks like matters.
2:16

When I was 17, my OB/GYN said I had “labia hypertrophy,” which means “excessive” labia minora. So when I turned 18, he completely amputated my labia minora, amputated the frenulum, and cut into my clitoris without my consent and damaged the nerves. After that, other OB/GYNs confidently told me the loss of sensation and inability to orgasm was all in my head and that I looked normal. This is why I campaign for the nerve anatomy to be taught and is also why I think knowing what normal anatomy looks like matters.

Jessica Pin

147,547 次观看 • 3 个月前

Here is the self-proclaimed “Journalism Jesus”, once again violating someone’s trust. This time, a former juror he interviewed. A juror who wanted to be anonymous at the time. He clearly recorded this conversation without asking for consent. We’ve downloaded and preserved the video, but will not share the full interview at this time out of respect for the juror’s privacy. This isn’t journalism. It’s a complete lack of ethics and morals. Pattern matters. Karen wasn’t an anomaly. This is how he operates. If you speak to this man, assume you are being recorded, whether you agreed to it or not.
1:02

Here is the self-proclaimed “Journalism Jesus”, once again violating someone’s trust. This time, a former juror he interviewed. A juror who wanted to be anonymous at the time. He clearly recorded this conversation without asking for consent. We’ve downloaded and preserved the video, but will not share the full interview at this time out of respect for the juror’s privacy. This isn’t journalism. It’s a complete lack of ethics and morals. Pattern matters. Karen wasn’t an anomaly. This is how he operates. If you speak to this man, assume you are being recorded, whether you agreed to it or not.

The old M can’t come to the phone right now

63,138 次观看 • 7 个月前