正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Consider this logic, everyone: 1️⃣ PayPal handled 22 billion payments in 2022 2️⃣ Sonic handles 10,000 ERC-20 transfers per second (each similar to a PayPal payment) 3️⃣ Hence, #Fantom can easily run 14 PayPal-sized companies The future is in sight, and it's undeniably fast 👇

46,237 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

$Fans铭文社区|Fantom 的头像
$Fans铭文社区|Fantom2 年前

Fantom's technology is very suitable for the development of FRC20 inscription ecology.

ᗩᒪTIᗰᗩTE💥ᗯᗩᖇᖇIOᖇ 的头像
ᗩᒪTIᗰᗩTE💥ᗯᗩᖇᖇIOᖇ2 年前

@PayPal @elonmusk @BlackRock y’all really need to check this out!! It’s POSSIBLE WITH #FANTOM

Jack The Oiler 💥 的头像
Jack The Oiler 💥2 年前

now put treeb on there. oops, we just killed visa

iamcharles.ftm | 👻🥷🌹 ττ x x | 的头像
iamcharles.ftm | 👻🥷🌹 ττ x x |2 年前

good comparison

GoGo Foundation 的头像
GoGo Foundation2 年前

Vitalik keep playing while $FTM getting to the top.

notGrippy 的头像
notGrippy2 年前

ftm should look to become the default payment rail that people choose over visa

币 的头像
币2 年前

🏅Evm公链铭文中Fantom链 $Fans 将成为首个被 @FRC20io 交易平台以平台币作为应用赋能的项目 📣官方已转发来自于@MessariCrypto 权威机构出具的Fantom报告里大篇幅讲述FRC-20和Fans。 报告地址: 关于FRC20和Fans基础介绍地址:

0xGasless | Account Abstraction (EIP-4337) 的头像
0xGasless | Account Abstraction (EIP-4337)2 年前

Impressive 👏

Hamed |.S 的头像
Hamed |.S2 年前

$wigo $ftm

Crypto Multi Millionaire 的头像
Crypto Multi Millionaire2 年前

I like this comparison $FTM

相关视频

We reported our third quarter results this morning. PayPal delivered another strong quarter with broad-based profitable growth across branded experiences, Venmo, and PSP. We also announced a new partnership with OpenAI to expand payments and commerce in ChatGPT. PayPal is a fundamentally stronger company today than we were two years ago. We returned the company to growth and are on pace for 6 to 7 percent transaction margin dollar growth, excluding interest on customer balances, in 2025. Here are some highlights 👇 🔵U.S. branded experiences (online and offline) volume accelerated to 10%, more than double our growth a year ago 🔵Venmo revenue was up more than 20% and TPV grew 14% 🔵Added 2 million first-time PayPal and Venmo debit card users in the U.S. 🔵Buy Now, Pay Later volume grew more than 20% 🔵Payment Service Provider (PSP) volume returned to healthy, profitable growth at 6% 🔵 We are also building for an agentic future, partnering with leaders such as Google, OpenAI, and Perplexity Given this strong momentum, we are raising our full year 2025 guidance for transaction margin dollars and earnings per share. We're also excited to announce that we are initiating a dividend, which demonstrates our ability to invest in growth and return capital to shareholders. Thank you to the hundreds of millions of merchants and consumers who trust PayPal every day, to our developers and partners, and to the PayPal team for your hard work and dedication. We are exceptionally well-positioned to win into the future. 💪

Alex Chriss

66,718 次观看 • 11 个月前

David Sacks on what made the PayPal Mafia so successful The employees of PayPal went on to build many of the companies that defined Silicon Valley in the 2000s, such as Tesla, SpaceX, LinkedIn, YouTube, Palantir, Yelp, Yammer, and more. David Sacks—founding COO and product leader at PayPal—reflects on some of the factors that he believed contributed to their success: “I think one of the key things was that PayPal innovated not just on product, but on distribution as well.” He gives three examples of distribution strategies the PayPal Mafia brought with them to their next companies: 1. Virality. PayPal paid users $20 to refer their friends, which led to explosive growth. Virality was a huge factor in LinkedIn’s success. 2. Building on an existing network/platform. PayPal leveraged eBay’s power seller network, while LinkedIn leveraged their users’ network of email contacts. You want to “go where the users already are,” Sacks argues. 3. Embeds. PayPal let customers embed the logo on their websites and eBay auctions. YouTube employed this same strategy by making their videos easy to embed on Myspace and other websites. Sacks continues: “All of these techniques today are commonplace, but in the early 2000s, we were one of the first companies to do them… We were innovating not just on product but on distribution as well, and that is something that all of the PayPal Mafia companies have done.” He contrasts the ~220 employees pre-IPO PayPal employees producing 7+ unicorns versus only a handful from Google even though Google had 100x the number of employees. “It’s a really interesting question: Why?… I think this sort of scrappiness around distribution is a big part of the explanation… If you’re an entrepreneur working in a small team, you’ve got to figure out from zero: How do I get my first user? How do I get the second user? How does that go to one hundred, one thousand, one million?… [Google] never has to think about that. They’ve got guaranteed distribution of half a billion users. And so, I think that scrappiness around distribution is one of the key reasons that there’s been so many PayPal mafia companies. I think it’s an interesting thing to think about as you create your own startups.” Video source: Draper University (2014)

Startup Archive

61,169 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: In a huge win, AAG Harmeet Dhillon has just FORCED PayPal into abolishing its DEI program and waiving fees for eligible American small businesses They were PRIORITIZING "minority businesses" Which is code for discriminating against white people. America First victory 🇺🇸 "DOJ Civil Rights is proud to announce a settlement with PayPal over its discriminatory 2020 program called its Economic Opportunity Fund, in which PayPal made $530 MILLION worth of capital available as loans on a preferential basis, only to minority owned businesses." "This of course discriminated against many other types of American businesses who are all entitled to the protection of the Equal Credit Protection Act, which we administer here at the Civil Rights Division." "As part of this settlement, PayPal has agreed to create a new small business initiative, and in that it's going to waive processing fees up to $30 million worth for $1 billion of transactions for businesses that are either veteran owned or that are certified by the farming, manufacturing, or technology." "I'm excited about this because a lot of American lenders continue to have these programs that may appear to be well meaning, but in the case of PayPal and many others, there's no finding a prior discrimination that would justify current discrimination against American small businesses or consumers." "And so the takeaway from this is that businesses in the United States that are engaged in lending cannot discriminate on the base of race, s*x, or other protected characteristics under our federal civil rights laws." "So small businesses out there that may qualify for this PayPal program, they should apply an American consumers that are aware of discriminatory lending practices like this by other American companies, banks, what have you, they should let us know because we'd like to do something about it."

Eric Daugherty

49,059 次观看 • 4 个月前

PayPal peaked near $322B. It trades around $30-40B now. David Sacks David Sacks walked the fall: a 25-year-old product still growing about 7% a year, cut to a tenth of its peak value. That is not a broken business. That is a cheap one - and cheap plus a strategic acquirer is how you get an M&A event. Chamath Chamath Palihapitiya expects the ~$60-per-share bid to clear **10-to-15% above** the offer, and hinted at a rival bidder with PayPal roots and trillions to spend. That is the arb: the announced price is a floor, not the exit. Friedberg david friedberg framed it as the second instance of a pattern - AI-native operators buying stale, founder-departed businesses and reviving them. The first instance is the cross-podcast anchor. Ryan Cohen Ryan Cohen laid out a $56B plan to take over eBay ($EBAY), the same playbook: a dormant marketplace, a founder long gone, an operator who thinks software and distribution can restart growth. PayPal is that trade with a payments network attached. Implication for $PYPL holders: this is event-driven arb, not a re-rating on fundamentals. The upside is the bidding dynamic - floor bid plus a hinted second buyer - not a bet that PayPal suddenly grows faster. The risk is a deal break on antitrust or financing, which drops it back to a 7%-grower multiple. Size it as a merger-arb position, not a conviction long. Watch for a competing bid to surface. Chamath's "trillions to spend" hint is the catalyst that would reprice this fast.

Podcast Alpha

128,579 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is going to blow your mind 🚨 Elon Musk tells Joe Rogan during his interview, the government payment system called ‘PAM’ processes $5 trillion dollars a year, that’s a BILLION DOLLARS AN HOUR It’s setup in a way to process “Basically UNTRACEABLE BLANK CHECKS — This is the kind of thing that if it was done as a public company, the company would be immediately delisted and the executive team would be thrown in prison.” - Just with a basic search of the Social Security database there were 20 million dead people marked as alive — Some of them were getting money - Elon Musk “was trying to get an answer right before the show” but was unable to exact figures - Elon Musk says “Most of the fraud is not coming from social security payments directly, but because they're marked as alive in the social security database, they can then get disability unemployment, sort of fake medical payments and other things because they're marked as alive in the social security database (BUT THE’RE DEAD) - The systems between Social Security, payments systems, government databases, medical payments, these systems don’t communicate between each other, “They don't talk to each other, they talk to each other very poorly in a very limited way. So the way that the system gets exploited is by taking advantage of the the poor communication between the various databases in the government” Here’s where it gets REALLY crazy There is a government payment that’s processed $5 TRILLION DOLLARS a year, that’s A BILLION DOLLARS AN HOUR “To give you an example of like what's happening in say Treasury, which is improving rapidly the main payments computer's called PAM, Payment Accounts Database or something like that. But everyone calls a PAM that's responsible for almost $5 trillion of payments a year, roughly a billion dollars an hour. When we came there, we're looking at this payment. The payments have no, you could put a payment through with no payment categorization code and no description on the payment, like basically untraceable blank checks.” “This is the kind of thing that if it was done as a public company, the company would be immediately delisted and the executive team would be thrown in prison.”

Wall Street Apes

965,953 次观看 • 1 年前

Affirm co-founders, CEO Max Levchin and a16z's Alex Rampell, on 25 years inside payments, from PayPal to agentic commerce: Payments is the biggest market on earth. No niche in it is smaller than $100 billion, and the industry has barely moved in 60 years. Visa and Mastercard keep card transaction windows too tight to build anything new inside. Max still calls the plastic card the best payment interface ever built. Affirm began in a 2011 email thread in which Max and Alex agreed that the nearest version of the idea was a bad business. Then a cosmetics brand using Affirm moved the offer from its checkout page to its product pages, and conversion jumped 30%. In this conversation with Erik Torenberg, they get into why Affirm walked away from the highest margins in payments, what a negative customer acquisition cost is actually worth, and why Max is bearish on agentic shopping but bullish on agentic payments. 00:00 Intro 01:00 The fraud rule that built Apple Pay 03:35 Visa's problematic transaction windows 05:30 No niches under $100 billion 07:10 The email that said Affirm was a bad idea 10:00 The wand that should've killed the card 12:36 Booed off stage for presenting PayPal 15:02 Why crypto still can't buy a cup of coffee 17:16 How Max and Alex met 20:11 The 500-Facebook-friends idea 26:48 The all-nighter PHP demo 30:58 Every startup gets 40 years in the desert 32:46 Moving one line lifted conversion 30% 35:02 Why Affirm walked away from the highest margins in payments 39:03 One article created an entire industry 40:37 The asterisk next to 0% 42:17 What BNPL misses about Affirm 44:03 Why merchants give Affirm customers 47:00 Why a 3-year loan is harder, and better, than a 6-week one 48:19 Why PayPal produced so many founders 52:43 Bullish on agentic payments, bearish on agentic shopping 57:51 Grocery shopping is already 100% agentic YouTube: Max Levchin Affirm Alex Rampell Erik Torenberg

a16z

246,502 次观看 • 22 天前

When the value of your payment approaches zero, traditional overhead does not. With credit cards, you have fixed fees. With onchain payments, you have gas. When your payment is worth less than the fee to send it, the economics don't add up. You would be spending dollars to collect fractions of a penny. That is what Nanopayments, powered by Circle Gateway and x402 addresses. It enables gas-free, high-frequency programmable payments down to $0.000001 This is particularly important for use cases where transactions happen at high frequency and in very small amounts, such as: Agentic Payments: AI agents transacting autonomously at high frequency. Usage-Based Billing: Charging exactly per API call, per second of compute, or per dataset access. Machine-to-Machine: Services or devices paying each other directly for resources in real-time. Here is how the end-to-end nanopayment lifecycle looks like: 1️⃣ Deposit: The buyer funds their Gateway balance via a one-time onchain transaction. 2️⃣ Request and Negotiate: The buyer requests a resource; the seller responds with 402 Payment Required via the x402 protocol. 3️⃣ Sign Authorization: The buyer signs an EIP-3009 message authorizing the transfer. This signature is created offchain and costs zero gas. 4️⃣ Settle and Serve: Gateway verifies the signature and credits the seller’s pending balance. The resource is served immediately. 5️⃣ Batch Settlement: Gateway periodically collects authorizations and settles them in a single onchain transaction. That is how Gateway and x402 make nanopayments viable. To follow along, check out the Quickstarts in the Circle documentation and share your build with us! Circle Developer

Elton Tay

10,358 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk just quietly launched a bank inside X. 6% APY on deposits. 3% cashback on purchases. But almost no one understands what this actually means... Here's what everyone is missing about the June 25 update, and why PayPal, Cash App, and Venmo just got put on notice: X started rolling out X Money to a small group of U.S. Premium+ users. This is the product Musk has been talking about since he bought Twitter: The "everything app." Social, payments, transfers, eventually broader banking. Peer-to-peer transfers powered by Visa Direct for near real-time settlement. A metal Visa debit card. For context, the national average savings rate in the U.S. is well below 1%. The highest yield on the typical big-bank checking account is roughly 0%. X is offering 6%. That number alone is enough to make every consumer fintech CFO in America uncomfortable. Now look at the regulatory groundwork most coverage skipped. X has secured more than 25 money transmitter licenses across U.S. states. That is the legal foundation for operating payments at national scale. It takes years to assemble and millions in legal and compliance work. Musk has been quietly doing that work for two years while critics insisted X was a dying ad business. Here's what the media keeps missing: X Money is designed to make X the place your money lives. Once your paycheck lands in X Money, your savings earn 6%, your card lives in the app, and your transfers happen inside the same feed where you read the news, the math of leaving gets ugly. PayPal doesn't have a feed. Cash App doesn't have a social graph. Venmo can't offer 6% APY without bleeding cash. X is the only consumer platform on earth that can run a social network and a banking product through the same login. For 20 years, you've logged into your bank, your brokerage, Venmo, and your social apps separately. X is collapsing all of that into one login. This is the WeChat playbook. Payments, transfers, commerce, and social all inside one app. WeChat now processes trillions in payments annually inside China. Musk has said publicly that WeChat is the model. Most people dismissed it as hype. Retail investors look at headlines and react. The wealthy look at the rails and position. A 6% APY launching inside a global social platform is a signal about where consumer finance is going. You can scroll past it and assume it doesn't matter to your portfolio. Or you can run a system that pays attention to structural shifts instead of headlines. Surmount helps you automate your investments with rules-based strategies built on data, not narratives...

Logan Weaver

259,256 次观看 • 3 个月前