Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

CONTENT WARNING ⚠️🇩🇪 In an amazing Coming Soon teaser Elijah Verbal and @GermanGingerX irrupt with guilty pleasure as they can’t resist the lure of forbidden fruit. GermanGingerX surrenders to Elijah Verbal’s playful banter while receiving huge cock under a mounting top position. “Little White Boy” & “Big Black N-Word... show more

✈️🎧 DJ Elijáh Verbál 🎵🎙️

16,779 subscribers

15,086 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

The N-word No white person actually wants to say the n-word...publicly. There is no contingent of white people who believe that saying the n-word somehow affirms their First Amendment right. And I won't pretend that it is a thing. Any white person who wants to say it will say it when the cameras are off or on. But in 2026, some whites want to say it only while the cameras are rolling. Why? Because racism is an industry and the n-word is a commodity. It's like an illicit drug whose dealers are white right-wing grifters and black liberals. Those are literally the only groups who care about that word. Everyone else knows how to be a normal civil human being. Only bankrupt whites are dying, say the word. Bankrupt intellectually, morally, and/or financially. When a person struggles intellectually, they tend to struggle financially. And there are interests who finance chaos. Remember George Soros and his reputation for financing discord in nations? There is nothing different here. A poor, struggling white can run to social media with rage bait to make a living while national and foreign interests fund it. Remember when the SPLC was accused of financing the same white supremacist groups they were supposed to be fighting? Outward racism is so uncommon that it needs to be manufactured. The black liberal is unemployed without the racist white. So, it is in his best interest to find and feed into racism. His wallet depends on it. The white racist and the black liberal have a symbiotic relationship. They need each other. Without one, there would be no other. And what do they have in common? A lot! They both identify with their race before their god. They both agree that the white man has all the power. They both believe in race-based employment practices. They both hate black men. And of course, they both use race as a tool to reach a certain level of success. The only thing that separates them is their skin color. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart. What we're seeing is a psychological operation designed to divide and conquer the people. This is the white version of black lives matter. This is the White Lives Matter movement. The financial interests saw how well BLM worked, so they are rebooting the same game plan, but with white people. The white people who are falling for this fall into two categories. Low IQ and grifters. The grifters do not have enough intelligence to get social media engagement from ingenuity and invention, so they pick the low-hanging fruit of rage bait. The low IQ blacks feed into it, and the low IQ whites follow the trend because they see the enormous engagement. However, that engagement isn't real. Those are trolls and bot farms from the same financial interests who wish to see this country divided. A united people are unstoppable, and the financial interests know this. Our politicians, who are fed by the financial interests, know this. Politics runs on problems. But the severe problems are never addressed because the petty ones are kept on the front page. In order to right this ship, we must increase our intelligence. We must learn where to place our focus. And require more from our elected officials and influencers. They runts salivate when the headline reads white vs black. It is a cash event for them. I say, we need to let them starve!

Hotep Jesus

34,741 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Athletico Madrid v Spurs Well, here I am again in Madrid. It’s my 4th time & I’ve not seen us win yet 🤦🏻‍♂️ We all know what happened at the Metropolitano stadium the last time, so I’m hoping for better luck this time. Tudor needs to get this team Performing tonight or he could well be toast soon. I don’t think we will get a result like the last encounter in 1963 when we won 5-1 in the European Cup final. Make no mistake, Simeone’s team is hard to beat at home with an 80% win rate. Atleti are strong, but not vintage, but still, that home advantage is huge. I expect intensity from both teams,plenty of cards, and maybe goals both ways. Their attack is so frightening, which might explain why they’ve scored 24 goals already in the UCL. It’s a big concern when we’ve conceded 2 goals a game for our last 9 games, a club record. Sorloth is a big 6ft 5 Btec Haarland threat, as is the class of Alvarez, and you just know Lookman is going to score against us. They are, however, not as strong defensively as they used to be, so I’m hoping somehow we can exploit that. Despite our lack of goals, we just need to be able to take back something to the Lane next week. With the chance to play a back 3 with Cuti, MVDV, and Danso for the first time that I can remember with Porto and Spence, I’m more hopeful. I’m going to go for a 2-2 draw, delusional probably, but without hope, there’s no point coming here to support the team. There are players in our team that will turn up and perform tonight to put themselves in the shop window looking for a move. #COYS 🤍💙

Athletico Madrid v Spurs Well, here I am again in Madrid. It’s my 4th time & I’ve not seen us win yet 🤦🏻‍♂️ We all know what happened at the Metropolitano stadium the last time, so I’m hoping for better luck this time. Tudor needs to get this team Performing tonight or he could well be toast soon. I don’t think we will get a result like the last encounter in 1963 when we won 5-1 in the European Cup final. Make no mistake, Simeone’s team is hard to beat at home with an 80% win rate. Atleti are strong, but not vintage, but still, that home advantage is huge. I expect intensity from both teams,plenty of cards, and maybe goals both ways. Their attack is so frightening, which might explain why they’ve scored 24 goals already in the UCL. It’s a big concern when we’ve conceded 2 goals a game for our last 9 games, a club record. Sorloth is a big 6ft 5 Btec Haarland threat, as is the class of Alvarez, and you just know Lookman is going to score against us. They are, however, not as strong defensively as they used to be, so I’m hoping somehow we can exploit that. Despite our lack of goals, we just need to be able to take back something to the Lane next week. With the chance to play a back 3 with Cuti, MVDV, and Danso for the first time that I can remember with Porto and Spence, I’m more hopeful. I’m going to go for a 2-2 draw, delusional probably, but without hope, there’s no point coming here to support the team. There are players in our team that will turn up and perform tonight to put themselves in the shop window looking for a move. #COYS 🤍💙

Jonny H

19,187 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In Ukraine, there are two camps. One stands for peace, the other for war. And it’s time we spoke about this openly. I believe the latter are fewer in number, yet far louder than anyone else. Of course — behind them stand enormous funds for propaganda and a license for impunity. They have thousands of talking heads, useful idiots, and people paralyzed by despair. They are ready to intimidate, harass, unleash bots, turn half the nation into “enemies of the people,” lecture and moralize, and teach you that your sons must die for the state. They insist that if you want the war to end, there’s something wrong with you — you’re naïve, stupid, or even insane. They claim there is no corruption, that all Ukrainians must remain poor, and that the conscription officers — which hunt men like animals and are notorious for torture and human rights abuses — are mere “Russian propaganda.” They say peace is impossible solely because of Putin, that the best hero is a dead hero, and that everyone shown on television is telling the truth. And then there’s the eternal message: “Just endure a little longer.” A few more months and we’ll win. Another six months and Russia will run out of resources. One more year and the war will be over. Every autocracy has had its propaganda. And every one operated on the same principle: silence, destroy, and hound the critics — while filling the media with the “right” people and the “right” messages. This summer, the last attempt this year to end the war will be made. It will be presented as American pressure, a betrayal of the Ukrainian people, especially Zelenskyy, or collaboration with Russia. They notice only the negative, and only when it’s time to shift blame onto someone else. As you may have noticed, according to Zelenskyy, everyone is guilty. Biden is guilty for talking about war and sowing panic. The West is guilty for not giving weapons on time. Trump is guilty for negotiating with Putin and trying to bring everyone to the table. Ukrainian men are guilty for not wanting to go to the front. Refugees are guilty for leaving and thus not being patriots. Critics are guilty because Ukraine is losing because of them. Deputy ministers, ministers, and long-time partners are guilty as they were caught in corruption. The only ones who are never guilty… are two specific people. I won’t name them. So this time, once again, everyone will be blamed. Zelenskyy will face a choice: either drag the war out further, or once again play the role of the unfortunate victim who, under pressure, is forced to do the unforgivable. We are offered various options to end the war, but our leadership rejects them all. The price of continuing the war is always the same — more rivers of Ukrainian blood, another horrific winter without electricity or heating, and hundreds of thousands more refugees. If this summer there is no peace agreement — any agreement at all — even a shaky ceasefire or a halt to large-scale shelling, the war will drag on at least until March. Because the United States, the only viable mediator and influential player, will be preoccupied with mid-term elections, then winter holidays, and then there will be the fifth anniversary of the war… Once again, we will be told to “endure a little longer,” and once again we will be fed stories about how Russia is about to collapse any day now. The people writing these messages are not stupid. They simply believe that we — all of us — are.

In Ukraine, there are two camps. One stands for peace, the other for war. And it’s time we spoke about this openly. I believe the latter are fewer in number, yet far louder than anyone else. Of course — behind them stand enormous funds for propaganda and a license for impunity. They have thousands of talking heads, useful idiots, and people paralyzed by despair. They are ready to intimidate, harass, unleash bots, turn half the nation into “enemies of the people,” lecture and moralize, and teach you that your sons must die for the state. They insist that if you want the war to end, there’s something wrong with you — you’re naïve, stupid, or even insane. They claim there is no corruption, that all Ukrainians must remain poor, and that the conscription officers — which hunt men like animals and are notorious for torture and human rights abuses — are mere “Russian propaganda.” They say peace is impossible solely because of Putin, that the best hero is a dead hero, and that everyone shown on television is telling the truth. And then there’s the eternal message: “Just endure a little longer.” A few more months and we’ll win. Another six months and Russia will run out of resources. One more year and the war will be over. Every autocracy has had its propaganda. And every one operated on the same principle: silence, destroy, and hound the critics — while filling the media with the “right” people and the “right” messages. This summer, the last attempt this year to end the war will be made. It will be presented as American pressure, a betrayal of the Ukrainian people, especially Zelenskyy, or collaboration with Russia. They notice only the negative, and only when it’s time to shift blame onto someone else. As you may have noticed, according to Zelenskyy, everyone is guilty. Biden is guilty for talking about war and sowing panic. The West is guilty for not giving weapons on time. Trump is guilty for negotiating with Putin and trying to bring everyone to the table. Ukrainian men are guilty for not wanting to go to the front. Refugees are guilty for leaving and thus not being patriots. Critics are guilty because Ukraine is losing because of them. Deputy ministers, ministers, and long-time partners are guilty as they were caught in corruption. The only ones who are never guilty… are two specific people. I won’t name them. So this time, once again, everyone will be blamed. Zelenskyy will face a choice: either drag the war out further, or once again play the role of the unfortunate victim who, under pressure, is forced to do the unforgivable. We are offered various options to end the war, but our leadership rejects them all. The price of continuing the war is always the same — more rivers of Ukrainian blood, another horrific winter without electricity or heating, and hundreds of thousands more refugees. If this summer there is no peace agreement — any agreement at all — even a shaky ceasefire or a halt to large-scale shelling, the war will drag on at least until March. Because the United States, the only viable mediator and influential player, will be preoccupied with mid-term elections, then winter holidays, and then there will be the fifth anniversary of the war… Once again, we will be told to “endure a little longer,” and once again we will be fed stories about how Russia is about to collapse any day now. The people writing these messages are not stupid. They simply believe that we — all of us — are.

Iuliia Mendel

102,798 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The prognosis is in. Mr. Wonderful should’ve been a doctor because he just accurately diagnosed half the globe as cuckoo. And if you’ve ever been around someone crazy, you know there’s nothing you can do. So, when we hear Al Gore say he’s living under the Third Reich, he must really believe that because he believes he invented the internet. It’s people like Gore who can’t accept reality, who can’t accept that Donald J. Trump won. These people have convinced themselves that when they’re not in power, they’re going to die. Or, if you don’t do what they tell you to do, like buy an electric car, you’re going to die. But nobody’s dying. They keep saying we’re on the brink of a recession, but the CEO of Chevron says, “No, we’re not… we’re not even close.” They said the world was going to side with China, and China was going to eat our lunch. So why are countries flying here to do deals with us? They said we couldn’t just “shut down the border” without Congress. That was a lie—he did it. Trump is the first president in 40 years to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. Democrats are jealous that he’s doing things they ran on and never did. Their dirty little playbook was to say they were going to do stuff, never do it, and then keep running on it again and again so they can be politicians for life and then get rich insider trading and taking half the week off. But Trump’s fixing the problem and finding their fraud, so the jig is up. So, when they say the world is going to end, yes, their world is ending. Their reality is over, and they never thought it would happen, so they’re having a hard time coming to grips with reality.

The prognosis is in. Mr. Wonderful should’ve been a doctor because he just accurately diagnosed half the globe as cuckoo. And if you’ve ever been around someone crazy, you know there’s nothing you can do. So, when we hear Al Gore say he’s living under the Third Reich, he must really believe that because he believes he invented the internet. It’s people like Gore who can’t accept reality, who can’t accept that Donald J. Trump won. These people have convinced themselves that when they’re not in power, they’re going to die. Or, if you don’t do what they tell you to do, like buy an electric car, you’re going to die. But nobody’s dying. They keep saying we’re on the brink of a recession, but the CEO of Chevron says, “No, we’re not… we’re not even close.” They said the world was going to side with China, and China was going to eat our lunch. So why are countries flying here to do deals with us? They said we couldn’t just “shut down the border” without Congress. That was a lie—he did it. Trump is the first president in 40 years to cut waste, fraud, and abuse. Democrats are jealous that he’s doing things they ran on and never did. Their dirty little playbook was to say they were going to do stuff, never do it, and then keep running on it again and again so they can be politicians for life and then get rich insider trading and taking half the week off. But Trump’s fixing the problem and finding their fraud, so the jig is up. So, when they say the world is going to end, yes, their world is ending. Their reality is over, and they never thought it would happen, so they’re having a hard time coming to grips with reality.

Jesse Watters

178,059 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: Tom Homan breaks down recounting the border tragedy that changed him forever. Tom Homan is known as one of the toughest voices on the border. But there’s a reason for that—because one moment shaped him. In an emotional exchange with Shawn Ryan, Homan recalled a human smuggling case in Victoria, Texas in 2003. Nineteen people had died in the back of a tractor trailer. “So I remember walking up to the—there’s a tractor trailer, and it was 19 people, baked to death in the back of that tractor trailer.” “They’re in a steel box, tractor trailer—no air, in the middle of summer.” The driver had unhooked the trailer and vanished. “I walk up to this tractor trailer… I see several bodies on the ground because when those doors finally opened up, the people are such a rush to get air that they knock some dead bodies out of the truck.” “Then I got to the back of a tractor trailer and—I just see that dead people.” But it was one victim in particular that shattered him. “As soon as I looked, I keyed in on a little boy.” “He was wearing the same color underwear that my little boy had. Same underwear. And I had a five-year-old son at the time.” Homan broke down. “So, when we got to the child, I knelt down beside him. Put my hand on him. I said a prayer because I knew based on the years I’ve done alien smuggling investigations, what a horrible, horrible death this child went through.” This is why Tom Homan refuses to back down. He’s seen what failure at the border really looks like. And he never wants to see it again.

NEW: Tom Homan breaks down recounting the border tragedy that changed him forever. Tom Homan is known as one of the toughest voices on the border. But there’s a reason for that—because one moment shaped him. In an emotional exchange with Shawn Ryan, Homan recalled a human smuggling case in Victoria, Texas in 2003. Nineteen people had died in the back of a tractor trailer. “So I remember walking up to the—there’s a tractor trailer, and it was 19 people, baked to death in the back of that tractor trailer.” “They’re in a steel box, tractor trailer—no air, in the middle of summer.” The driver had unhooked the trailer and vanished. “I walk up to this tractor trailer… I see several bodies on the ground because when those doors finally opened up, the people are such a rush to get air that they knock some dead bodies out of the truck.” “Then I got to the back of a tractor trailer and—I just see that dead people.” But it was one victim in particular that shattered him. “As soon as I looked, I keyed in on a little boy.” “He was wearing the same color underwear that my little boy had. Same underwear. And I had a five-year-old son at the time.” Homan broke down. “So, when we got to the child, I knelt down beside him. Put my hand on him. I said a prayer because I knew based on the years I’ve done alien smuggling investigations, what a horrible, horrible death this child went through.” This is why Tom Homan refuses to back down. He’s seen what failure at the border really looks like. And he never wants to see it again.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

66,792 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

MIC DROP: Rep. Wesley Hunt FIRES BACK at Gavin Newsom’s “I’m like you” 960 SAT remark to a room full of Black voters. “Gavin, you’re not like me. I studied my butt off to get here!” “Under no circumstances are you going to just belittle us by assuming that all Black people have a 960 SAT and we could barely read.” “I had parents who believed in education. We had a sign in our house that said, ‘Jesus + education equals success.’” “There’s a reason why I earned three master’s degrees in four years from Cornell University. My brother is a Harvard Business School graduate. My sister has her master’s degree in Applied Mathematics. She was a West Point instructor while both my brother and I were cadets, and WE WERE BLACK doing it the entire time.” “And so when you say that I can’t read and I have a 960 SAT, the insinuation that you are putting on all Black people is that we are a monolith, that this is how you view us.” “I call it the soft bigotry of low expectations.” “I think about Hillary Clinton carrying hot sauce in her purse. I think about Joe Biden saying, ‘If you don’t vote for me, then you ain’t Black.’ I think about Kathy Hochul talking about ‘Black kids don’t even know what a computer is.’ And I see these kinds of things, and I just shake my head.” “I worked my butt off to get here. Hard work, grit, determination, and I’m standing on my own two feet as a Black man that represents a white majority district that President Trump would have won by 20 points, and I won by 25 points because I’m being judged not by the color of my skin, but by the content of my character.”

MIC DROP: Rep. Wesley Hunt FIRES BACK at Gavin Newsom’s “I’m like you” 960 SAT remark to a room full of Black voters. “Gavin, you’re not like me. I studied my butt off to get here!” “Under no circumstances are you going to just belittle us by assuming that all Black people have a 960 SAT and we could barely read.” “I had parents who believed in education. We had a sign in our house that said, ‘Jesus + education equals success.’” “There’s a reason why I earned three master’s degrees in four years from Cornell University. My brother is a Harvard Business School graduate. My sister has her master’s degree in Applied Mathematics. She was a West Point instructor while both my brother and I were cadets, and WE WERE BLACK doing it the entire time.” “And so when you say that I can’t read and I have a 960 SAT, the insinuation that you are putting on all Black people is that we are a monolith, that this is how you view us.” “I call it the soft bigotry of low expectations.” “I think about Hillary Clinton carrying hot sauce in her purse. I think about Joe Biden saying, ‘If you don’t vote for me, then you ain’t Black.’ I think about Kathy Hochul talking about ‘Black kids don’t even know what a computer is.’ And I see these kinds of things, and I just shake my head.” “I worked my butt off to get here. Hard work, grit, determination, and I’m standing on my own two feet as a Black man that represents a white majority district that President Trump would have won by 20 points, and I won by 25 points because I’m being judged not by the color of my skin, but by the content of my character.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

283,163 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

After the ICE shooting last week in Minnesota, Black Lives Matter MN gave a speech demanding justice and ranting about ICE. Renee Good wasn’t Black, so why is BLM giving a press conference about her? It’s because BLM was never about Black Americans; it’s about revolution. Most became familiar with BLM post-George Floyd where they were able to attach themselves to his death. But Black Lives Matter is not a black organization, it’s a communist organization using Black people’s images as cover. It was hard for people to see this in 2020 since emotions were so high and they allowed communists to speak for the life of the average Black American. They were given the microphone to portray my existence is inevitably deprived simply due to my skin color. However, I recognized early on their tactics and why they were pushing such a strong message and condemnation of America. Communists use propaganda like a weapon and they take truth to gain legitimacy so they can manipulate you into believing the lies that will come later. Good propaganda, like a good conspiracy, needs an ounce of truth to push heavy loads of exaggerations and falsehoods down the line. It’s why their talking points sometimes land with people who aren’t familiar with their tactics. Sure, you can talk about slavery, Jim Crow, or any other historical mess and you can analyze it. However, their objective isn’t to recognize our historical wrongs for a better future: It’s to use it as a reason to tear down America. There are reasons they use words like “institutional” or “systemic” because their hatred goes past an individual to the collective. They are collectivists who hold all guilty if they are tacitly part of that collective. It’s why they say you benefited from “White Supremacy” because no matter how good of a person you are, you will always be tainted with historical stains. And you don’t have to be White to be a White Supremacist because if you defend the institutions they want to dismantle, you are automatically part of that collective. Good propagandists use everything to their advantage and they know that there is a social guilt about what has been done to Black Americans. It’s a point of leverage to get normal people to concede to communistic demands. They will always use Black Communists to speak for the collective and tribal nature over time has convinced us that communistic symbolism, like the raised fist in the air, is in fact Black in nature because we saw some dudes in afros doing it on old film. They’d have you think that the Black Panthers were popular and admired by Black Americans, when they weren’t. They were fringe, radical communists who were constantly shouting for revolution. They hid behind the imagery of being some type of militant neighborhood watch but every communist’s goal is to destroy the current system to instill theirs. They don’t care that it’s a tall mountain to climb because they enjoy being martyrs for a cause. The ends always justify the means for them, so lying and misrepresenting is fine as long as it pushes us closer to revolution. They will hijack trusted institutions, like government or churches, and use this inherent trust like a skin suit tricking unsuspecting people to believe what they want you to believe. This is no different from Black Lives Matter. For most people, it’s enough to see some angry black people on stage yelling about justice to convince them that this is the demeanor or demand of the average Black American in America. Black people like me stand in the way of their cause and when we speak out against them, they’ll call me the sellout for wanting to preserve the positives of American life. We are in or around the demoralization phase of revolution. They don’t need the support of Americans to be in support of their cause or to do anything to overtly support them. They just need enough people to sit on their hands while targeting institutions of power to either destroy from the outside or infiltrate to dismantle from within. Renee Good is their martyr, just as George Floyd was in 2020. You don’t have to knowingly sacrifice yourself or even be a communist to be a martyr for them; hijacking identities, especially dead ones, are perfect for manipulating the public. They will instigate events, cause chaos and when something goes awry, they’ll use it against us. This is exactly what’s happening in Minnesota with ICE. ICE could operate under normal conditions like it does everywhere else but they’ve turned non-newsworthy apprehensions into a spectacle so that it taints their image so they can force incidents exactly like Renee Good’s death. Now, when there are riots, it’s ICE’s fault and not the heavily funded leftist organizations who financially exist because of adversarial foreign nations who can’t wait till the United States is demoted from its power position. They are agitators at their core, they will use all goodwill to their advantage and strangle us with our own niceness. They will poke and prod our society, forcing you to question everything you held as sacred so they can replace it with something that suits them. Communist agitators are dying for Black Americans to be convinced that this somehow is negatively impacting us and they will propel any black face to make this happen. God help us if a black communist gets killed while provoking a response from ICE. Black Lives Matter Global and Minnesota doesn’t give a damn about Black people it can’t use to further a revolution. They’re not a Black advocacy group; they’re a communist outfit that gallivants in blackface.

After the ICE shooting last week in Minnesota, Black Lives Matter MN gave a speech demanding justice and ranting about ICE. Renee Good wasn’t Black, so why is BLM giving a press conference about her? It’s because BLM was never about Black Americans; it’s about revolution. Most became familiar with BLM post-George Floyd where they were able to attach themselves to his death. But Black Lives Matter is not a black organization, it’s a communist organization using Black people’s images as cover. It was hard for people to see this in 2020 since emotions were so high and they allowed communists to speak for the life of the average Black American. They were given the microphone to portray my existence is inevitably deprived simply due to my skin color. However, I recognized early on their tactics and why they were pushing such a strong message and condemnation of America. Communists use propaganda like a weapon and they take truth to gain legitimacy so they can manipulate you into believing the lies that will come later. Good propaganda, like a good conspiracy, needs an ounce of truth to push heavy loads of exaggerations and falsehoods down the line. It’s why their talking points sometimes land with people who aren’t familiar with their tactics. Sure, you can talk about slavery, Jim Crow, or any other historical mess and you can analyze it. However, their objective isn’t to recognize our historical wrongs for a better future: It’s to use it as a reason to tear down America. There are reasons they use words like “institutional” or “systemic” because their hatred goes past an individual to the collective. They are collectivists who hold all guilty if they are tacitly part of that collective. It’s why they say you benefited from “White Supremacy” because no matter how good of a person you are, you will always be tainted with historical stains. And you don’t have to be White to be a White Supremacist because if you defend the institutions they want to dismantle, you are automatically part of that collective. Good propagandists use everything to their advantage and they know that there is a social guilt about what has been done to Black Americans. It’s a point of leverage to get normal people to concede to communistic demands. They will always use Black Communists to speak for the collective and tribal nature over time has convinced us that communistic symbolism, like the raised fist in the air, is in fact Black in nature because we saw some dudes in afros doing it on old film. They’d have you think that the Black Panthers were popular and admired by Black Americans, when they weren’t. They were fringe, radical communists who were constantly shouting for revolution. They hid behind the imagery of being some type of militant neighborhood watch but every communist’s goal is to destroy the current system to instill theirs. They don’t care that it’s a tall mountain to climb because they enjoy being martyrs for a cause. The ends always justify the means for them, so lying and misrepresenting is fine as long as it pushes us closer to revolution. They will hijack trusted institutions, like government or churches, and use this inherent trust like a skin suit tricking unsuspecting people to believe what they want you to believe. This is no different from Black Lives Matter. For most people, it’s enough to see some angry black people on stage yelling about justice to convince them that this is the demeanor or demand of the average Black American in America. Black people like me stand in the way of their cause and when we speak out against them, they’ll call me the sellout for wanting to preserve the positives of American life. We are in or around the demoralization phase of revolution. They don’t need the support of Americans to be in support of their cause or to do anything to overtly support them. They just need enough people to sit on their hands while targeting institutions of power to either destroy from the outside or infiltrate to dismantle from within. Renee Good is their martyr, just as George Floyd was in 2020. You don’t have to knowingly sacrifice yourself or even be a communist to be a martyr for them; hijacking identities, especially dead ones, are perfect for manipulating the public. They will instigate events, cause chaos and when something goes awry, they’ll use it against us. This is exactly what’s happening in Minnesota with ICE. ICE could operate under normal conditions like it does everywhere else but they’ve turned non-newsworthy apprehensions into a spectacle so that it taints their image so they can force incidents exactly like Renee Good’s death. Now, when there are riots, it’s ICE’s fault and not the heavily funded leftist organizations who financially exist because of adversarial foreign nations who can’t wait till the United States is demoted from its power position. They are agitators at their core, they will use all goodwill to their advantage and strangle us with our own niceness. They will poke and prod our society, forcing you to question everything you held as sacred so they can replace it with something that suits them. Communist agitators are dying for Black Americans to be convinced that this somehow is negatively impacting us and they will propel any black face to make this happen. God help us if a black communist gets killed while provoking a response from ICE. Black Lives Matter Global and Minnesota doesn’t give a damn about Black people it can’t use to further a revolution. They’re not a Black advocacy group; they’re a communist outfit that gallivants in blackface.

Adam B. Coleman, Proud Father & Imperfect Man

83,689 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Just finished reading SB19’s four page feature in Rolling Stone Japan, and I honestly couldn’t be prouder. Seeing a Filipino group receive this kind of spotlight in one of Japan’s biggest music magazines is such a huge milestone. Having four full pages dedicated to SB19 is an incredible achievement. It’s also amazing to see them continue to appear in Japanese magazines and media, opening more doors and proving that Filipino artists deserve to be recognized on the global stage. You get to understand each member’s thoughts, perspectives, and aspirations while also seeing their shared vision as SB19. Reading their individual insights and how they come together as one group made me appreciate them even more. One thing that really stood out to me is that they believe they still haven’t shown everything they’re capable of. Even with everything they’ve achieved so far, they want to keep evolving and introduce a fearless new side of SB19 while staying true to who they are. That mindset is truly inspiring. I also loved reading about their friendship with BE:FIRST. There’s so much mutual respect between the two groups, and it’s heartwarming to see artists from different countries genuinely supporting each other and building meaningful connections. They also shared that they’d love to collaborate with more Japanese artists in the future, which would be so exciting to see. And of course, their upcoming milestones are incredible. They’re looking forward to performing at Summer Sonic 2026 and introducing more people to Filipino music. Even more exciting is their historic first appearance at Lollapalooza Chicago as the first Filipino artists to perform there. It’s such a proud moment not just for SB19, but for the entire Philippine music scene. Their journey keeps getting bigger, and it’s such a privilege to witness it as a fan. I’m so proud of how far they’ve come, and I can’t wait to see what’s next. 🇵🇭❤️ #SB19

Just finished reading SB19’s four page feature in Rolling Stone Japan, and I honestly couldn’t be prouder. Seeing a Filipino group receive this kind of spotlight in one of Japan’s biggest music magazines is such a huge milestone. Having four full pages dedicated to SB19 is an incredible achievement. It’s also amazing to see them continue to appear in Japanese magazines and media, opening more doors and proving that Filipino artists deserve to be recognized on the global stage. You get to understand each member’s thoughts, perspectives, and aspirations while also seeing their shared vision as SB19. Reading their individual insights and how they come together as one group made me appreciate them even more. One thing that really stood out to me is that they believe they still haven’t shown everything they’re capable of. Even with everything they’ve achieved so far, they want to keep evolving and introduce a fearless new side of SB19 while staying true to who they are. That mindset is truly inspiring. I also loved reading about their friendship with BE:FIRST. There’s so much mutual respect between the two groups, and it’s heartwarming to see artists from different countries genuinely supporting each other and building meaningful connections. They also shared that they’d love to collaborate with more Japanese artists in the future, which would be so exciting to see. And of course, their upcoming milestones are incredible. They’re looking forward to performing at Summer Sonic 2026 and introducing more people to Filipino music. Even more exciting is their historic first appearance at Lollapalooza Chicago as the first Filipino artists to perform there. It’s such a proud moment not just for SB19, but for the entire Philippine music scene. Their journey keeps getting bigger, and it’s such a privilege to witness it as a fan. I’m so proud of how far they’ve come, and I can’t wait to see what’s next. 🇵🇭❤️ #SB19

GEL🧛🏻🍢🍭☀️

25,505 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Other Side of Meerut Band Baaja Baaraat story: ➤Pranita Sharma and Army Caption (Now Major) Gaurav Agnihotri married in 2018. Immediately after their marriage parents of Pranita started unnecessary interference in the life of couple which led to frequent disputes. ➤Father of Pranita was a Judge in Uttarakhand whereas her Brother Pranav Vashisht was a Supreme Court Lawyer. They lodged multiple cases against Gaurav and his family in Delhi, Bareilly and Prayagraj after one year of the marriage in the year 2019. Father of Pranita tried to misuse his position as a Judge to force the Police to arrest Major Gaurav and his parents. Panicked Parents of the husband approached Uttarakhand Governor after which an enquiry has started. ➤After that all of a sudden Father of Pranita agreed to send back his daughter to her matrimonial house and decided to withdraw all the cases. ➤Even after that Pranita kept fighting with her husband and In Laws under the influence of her mother. She abused and attacked her Father In Law many times and also physically manhandled her husband on many occasions. Because of the continuous pressure form Pranita and her Family, Father of Gaurav transferred 3 Bigha of Land in the name of Pranita in the year 2023. ➤In 2022, brother of Pranita died in an accident. Pranita gave birth to a child in 2024. Now the mother of Pranita started claiming that the child of Pranita is the rebirth of her son Pranav and insisted that the child shall stay with them and wanted to name the child as "Pranav". ➤Last year Pranita left her husband and came to her parental house where she did Mundan of the child without informing Gaurav. And when Gaurav objected to the same, Pranita and her parents demanded Divorce or threatened to file cases against the husband and his parents. ➤At last, finding no other way and because of the Women Centric Gender biased Laws of the Country, Major Gaurav agreed for mutual Divorce. ➤Was there any alimony paid by Gaurav to his wife? No, alimony was not paid because Pranita and her Parents made it a condition that the child of Gaurav will stay with them and Gaurav was not given even any visitation rights as a condition of Mutual divorce. ➤What about Streedhan? Gaurav and his parents gifted Jewellery of more than 70 Lacs to Pranita at the time of her Marriage and later which all are with her now. Even a Gold chain gifted by them to Gaurav needs to be returned to them as per the terms of the Divorce agreement. ➤A Verna car of Gaurav is in the illegal possession of Pranita and her Parents. Meanwhile, as per the terms of mutual divorce, parents of Gaurav are in the process of returning all the remaining belongings of Pranita. (Video is attached). So, the claim that they did not take back the Streedhan is completely false. ➤ As, per mutual divorce terms, both the husband and the wife were suppose to not interfere in each others life but still Pranita and her Parents choose to defame and demean Major Gaurav and his Parents by indulging in cheap theatrics. ➤So, Pranita got around 70 Lakhs of Jewellery, 3 Bigha of Land, all her Belongings and absolute custody of the child as per her Divorce settlement. ➤And What Gaurav got after suffering for 7 years in a hostile Marriage? ➤Never trust a story without knowing the other side. Matrimonial disputes are not just Black & White but there is always a grey area.

The Other Side of Meerut Band Baaja Baaraat story: ➤Pranita Sharma and Army Caption (Now Major) Gaurav Agnihotri married in 2018. Immediately after their marriage parents of Pranita started unnecessary interference in the life of couple which led to frequent disputes. ➤Father of Pranita was a Judge in Uttarakhand whereas her Brother Pranav Vashisht was a Supreme Court Lawyer. They lodged multiple cases against Gaurav and his family in Delhi, Bareilly and Prayagraj after one year of the marriage in the year 2019. Father of Pranita tried to misuse his position as a Judge to force the Police to arrest Major Gaurav and his parents. Panicked Parents of the husband approached Uttarakhand Governor after which an enquiry has started. ➤After that all of a sudden Father of Pranita agreed to send back his daughter to her matrimonial house and decided to withdraw all the cases. ➤Even after that Pranita kept fighting with her husband and In Laws under the influence of her mother. She abused and attacked her Father In Law many times and also physically manhandled her husband on many occasions. Because of the continuous pressure form Pranita and her Family, Father of Gaurav transferred 3 Bigha of Land in the name of Pranita in the year 2023. ➤In 2022, brother of Pranita died in an accident. Pranita gave birth to a child in 2024. Now the mother of Pranita started claiming that the child of Pranita is the rebirth of her son Pranav and insisted that the child shall stay with them and wanted to name the child as "Pranav". ➤Last year Pranita left her husband and came to her parental house where she did Mundan of the child without informing Gaurav. And when Gaurav objected to the same, Pranita and her parents demanded Divorce or threatened to file cases against the husband and his parents. ➤At last, finding no other way and because of the Women Centric Gender biased Laws of the Country, Major Gaurav agreed for mutual Divorce. ➤Was there any alimony paid by Gaurav to his wife? No, alimony was not paid because Pranita and her Parents made it a condition that the child of Gaurav will stay with them and Gaurav was not given even any visitation rights as a condition of Mutual divorce. ➤What about Streedhan? Gaurav and his parents gifted Jewellery of more than 70 Lacs to Pranita at the time of her Marriage and later which all are with her now. Even a Gold chain gifted by them to Gaurav needs to be returned to them as per the terms of the Divorce agreement. ➤A Verna car of Gaurav is in the illegal possession of Pranita and her Parents. Meanwhile, as per the terms of mutual divorce, parents of Gaurav are in the process of returning all the remaining belongings of Pranita. (Video is attached). So, the claim that they did not take back the Streedhan is completely false. ➤ As, per mutual divorce terms, both the husband and the wife were suppose to not interfere in each others life but still Pranita and her Parents choose to defame and demean Major Gaurav and his Parents by indulging in cheap theatrics. ➤So, Pranita got around 70 Lakhs of Jewellery, 3 Bigha of Land, all her Belongings and absolute custody of the child as per her Divorce settlement. ➤And What Gaurav got after suffering for 7 years in a hostile Marriage? ➤Never trust a story without knowing the other side. Matrimonial disputes are not just Black & White but there is always a grey area.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

87,616 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🔥RFK Jr. rails against government “obliterating the Constitution” during Covid lockdowns: “If a government has the capacity to silence its critics, it has license for any atrocity. We saw during Covid… as soon as they realized that we were going to put up with being silenced, they went after all the other rights in the Constitution.” “I was the first person who was censored by the Biden administration [in January 2021], and that story is documented in the federal court decision by Judge Doughty. Judge Doughty’s 155-page decision detailed that 37 hours after he took the oath of office, President Biden’s White House was ordering the social media sites to remove my accounts. The White House invented a new word called ‘malinformation,’ which is information that is true, but nevertheless is inconvenient for government. So, I have a number of things to say about this… My first day in office, I’m going to issue an executive order ordering all federal employees to not collude with social media or media sites in censoring political speech in this country. I’m going to pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden my first day in office as a civics lesson to the American public about the importance of free speech and protecting whistleblowers rather than punishing and imprisoning them. Hamilton, Madison and Adams said that they put freedom of expression as the first amendment because all of the other rights that we enjoy are dependent on it. If a government has the capacity to silence its critics, it has license for any atrocity. We saw during Covid that immediately the government started censoring our speech... 41% of black-owned businesses that were shut during Covid will never re-open. We closed 3.3 million businesses with no due process, no just compensation, no scientific citation. Many of those businesses had three generations of equity in them. Three generations working to construct that business which was a fulcrum, an anchor or the community. We just shut them down without any public hearings. As soon as they realized that we were going to put up with being silenced, they went after all the other rights in the Constitution. The other part of the first amendment is freedom of worship. They shut down every church in this country for a year… Then they went after the right to assembly, they ordered us to socially distance. And two days ago in closed hearings with the Senate and the House, Anthony Fauci admitted… that the social distancing, he didn’t know where that came from, there was no science behind it. Then they went after jury trials. The seventh amendment says that no American shall be denied the right of a trial before a jury of his peers in cases and controversies exceeding $25 in value… It doesn’t say ‘except when there’s a pandemic.’ The Framers of the Constitution knew all about epidemics… but they did not put an exception for epidemics in the Constitution. They said the Constitution was written for hard times. It was written for inconvenient speech, not convenient speech. They went after our property rights, the fifth amendment. They closed all these businesses without due process, without just compensation. They went after the fourth amendment prohibitions against warrantless searches and seizures with all this track snd trace surveillance. They basically obliterated the Constitution, once they got rid of freedom of speech, they could do anything they wanted. The remedy for bad information is more information. It’s not government censorship.”

🔥RFK Jr. rails against government “obliterating the Constitution” during Covid lockdowns: “If a government has the capacity to silence its critics, it has license for any atrocity. We saw during Covid… as soon as they realized that we were going to put up with being silenced, they went after all the other rights in the Constitution.” “I was the first person who was censored by the Biden administration [in January 2021], and that story is documented in the federal court decision by Judge Doughty. Judge Doughty’s 155-page decision detailed that 37 hours after he took the oath of office, President Biden’s White House was ordering the social media sites to remove my accounts. The White House invented a new word called ‘malinformation,’ which is information that is true, but nevertheless is inconvenient for government. So, I have a number of things to say about this… My first day in office, I’m going to issue an executive order ordering all federal employees to not collude with social media or media sites in censoring political speech in this country. I’m going to pardon Julian Assange and Edward Snowden my first day in office as a civics lesson to the American public about the importance of free speech and protecting whistleblowers rather than punishing and imprisoning them. Hamilton, Madison and Adams said that they put freedom of expression as the first amendment because all of the other rights that we enjoy are dependent on it. If a government has the capacity to silence its critics, it has license for any atrocity. We saw during Covid that immediately the government started censoring our speech... 41% of black-owned businesses that were shut during Covid will never re-open. We closed 3.3 million businesses with no due process, no just compensation, no scientific citation. Many of those businesses had three generations of equity in them. Three generations working to construct that business which was a fulcrum, an anchor or the community. We just shut them down without any public hearings. As soon as they realized that we were going to put up with being silenced, they went after all the other rights in the Constitution. The other part of the first amendment is freedom of worship. They shut down every church in this country for a year… Then they went after the right to assembly, they ordered us to socially distance. And two days ago in closed hearings with the Senate and the House, Anthony Fauci admitted… that the social distancing, he didn’t know where that came from, there was no science behind it. Then they went after jury trials. The seventh amendment says that no American shall be denied the right of a trial before a jury of his peers in cases and controversies exceeding $25 in value… It doesn’t say ‘except when there’s a pandemic.’ The Framers of the Constitution knew all about epidemics… but they did not put an exception for epidemics in the Constitution. They said the Constitution was written for hard times. It was written for inconvenient speech, not convenient speech. They went after our property rights, the fifth amendment. They closed all these businesses without due process, without just compensation. They went after the fourth amendment prohibitions against warrantless searches and seizures with all this track snd trace surveillance. They basically obliterated the Constitution, once they got rid of freedom of speech, they could do anything they wanted. The remedy for bad information is more information. It’s not government censorship.”

Holden Culotta

73,954 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

‼️BREAKING: Erika Kirk To HOST White House UFC EVENT on June 14th — And the Official UFC Account Is Now TEASING A Sanctioned FIGHT Between Her and Druski 👀 The White House confirmed that Erika Kirk has been selected to host an upcoming UFC event. They claimed she was chosen because of her “ability to remain composed while discussing highly chaotic situations.” Ma’am… your entire brand right now is chaos. You’ve got more smoke around you than a post-fight Octagon. But somehow, that made you the perfect pick to host an event full of fighters and elected officials. As if that wasn’t insane enough, the official UFC account just posted asking fans: “Would you guys watch if we sanctioned this fight?” with side-by-side images of Erika Kirk and Druski. We are so deep in the upside down that I genuinely can’t tell if this is a troll or if we’re actually living in a simulation. Because putting Erika Kirk in front of a live combat sports crowd right now isn’t a fight card… that’s a hostage situation with better lighting. She is universally disliked. People see her as weird, cringe, and part of the elite class. If their goal was to make sure as few people as possible tune in, they picked the perfect host. We’re so far gone that we can’t even tell what’s real and what’s satire anymore. Wake me up when this nightmare ends. We’re living in a clown show. ⚠️My channel is under attack to try to bankrupt me. If you want to support me and help me keep exposing these clowns, donate here 🔗

Project Constitution

65,874 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This is gonna be so long omg but when it comes to translating in Korean, it’s very very important to take in consideration of 1) Culture 2) Seniority, the Closeness & Intimacy of the people involved in a conversation. Because this gives an entire different vibe for the context. And we have to keep in mind that there are Korean phrases and expressions that simply don’t have just One way, exact words that can be translated in English. Translators can find ways to convey the meaning, but it requires more explanation and understanding of the context while conveying it, and not relying on assumptions. How about “인상 덜 쓰기” or “인상 쓰다“ then? Here, a direct translation can simply be 인상 덜 쓰기 - be less grumpy/ frown less, etc 인상 쓰다 - being grumpy, frown, make a face, etc Here, I include an educational video of an English speaker talking with a Korean speaker where they’re discussing a similar expression, “인상 좀 쓰지마!“ (which in word by word in English, it sounds something like “Don’t frown/ Don’t make a face”) Now, as an English speaker, that sounds a bit harsh doesn’t it? That’s because such expression doesn’t exist in just One interpretation in English, so if we only read it as it is, without considering the context and the speakers’ closeness, we’re bound to misunderstand the context. Quoting some parts of this video, 💚: “Now, Tyler’s expression for today is ‘인상 좀 쓰지마!’. Have you ever heard of this expression? 🩶: I’ve heard something like that before 💚: Then doesn’t this mean there’s a same expression in English too right? 🩶: Oh! I’ve only heard it in Korea 💚: Ah really? The guy then explained that if you say something like this in english, it can be rude. so it’s better not to say it in English-speaking countries. He gave examples like “If you do that, you’ll get wrinkles”, and the other guy added something like “If you make an ugly face, you’ll have wrinkles” and said that “If someone (an English speaker) hears this they would think I must be crazy” Here, they’re talking about the cultural differences. A phrase like this, when expressed directly, without considering people’s closeness, and being translated exactly like that, would sound so negative to English speakers. *also notice how this phrase is being worded in various ways??? ‘HOW’ it can sound to someone, really depends on their culture, their closeness with the person, and context* So later on, he gave a few more examples like, “stop making such a long face”, and “stop wrinkling your forehead”. And concluded that: 💚: Well in that case, the phrase “인상 좀 쓰지마” is basically a phrase that doesn’t exist in English. 🩶: It’s an expression that we don’t use. It’s not that it doesn’t exist. (This part, he’s explaining that there’s no such a thing as word by word to explain this phrase in English, bcs we English speakers use different wordings that is more suitable for a situation’s nuances.) Then again, we have to consider speakers’ closeness as well because in Korea, it’s a huge thing. If you don’t understand how this works, you won’t understand the nuances of a conversation. You’re bound to misunderstand. If you refuse to understand it then, I don’t think you want to respect their culture. Because again, this is a huge thing.

This is gonna be so long omg but when it comes to translating in Korean, it’s very very important to take in consideration of 1) Culture 2) Seniority, the Closeness & Intimacy of the people involved in a conversation. Because this gives an entire different vibe for the context. And we have to keep in mind that there are Korean phrases and expressions that simply don’t have just One way, exact words that can be translated in English. Translators can find ways to convey the meaning, but it requires more explanation and understanding of the context while conveying it, and not relying on assumptions. How about “인상 덜 쓰기” or “인상 쓰다“ then? Here, a direct translation can simply be 인상 덜 쓰기 - be less grumpy/ frown less, etc 인상 쓰다 - being grumpy, frown, make a face, etc Here, I include an educational video of an English speaker talking with a Korean speaker where they’re discussing a similar expression, “인상 좀 쓰지마!“ (which in word by word in English, it sounds something like “Don’t frown/ Don’t make a face”) Now, as an English speaker, that sounds a bit harsh doesn’t it? That’s because such expression doesn’t exist in just One interpretation in English, so if we only read it as it is, without considering the context and the speakers’ closeness, we’re bound to misunderstand the context. Quoting some parts of this video, 💚: “Now, Tyler’s expression for today is ‘인상 좀 쓰지마!’. Have you ever heard of this expression? 🩶: I’ve heard something like that before 💚: Then doesn’t this mean there’s a same expression in English too right? 🩶: Oh! I’ve only heard it in Korea 💚: Ah really? The guy then explained that if you say something like this in english, it can be rude. so it’s better not to say it in English-speaking countries. He gave examples like “If you do that, you’ll get wrinkles”, and the other guy added something like “If you make an ugly face, you’ll have wrinkles” and said that “If someone (an English speaker) hears this they would think I must be crazy” Here, they’re talking about the cultural differences. A phrase like this, when expressed directly, without considering people’s closeness, and being translated exactly like that, would sound so negative to English speakers. also notice how this phrase is being worded in various ways??? ‘HOW’ it can sound to someone, really depends on their culture, their closeness with the person, and context So later on, he gave a few more examples like, “stop making such a long face”, and “stop wrinkling your forehead”. And concluded that: 💚: Well in that case, the phrase “인상 좀 쓰지마” is basically a phrase that doesn’t exist in English. 🩶: It’s an expression that we don’t use. It’s not that it doesn’t exist. (This part, he’s explaining that there’s no such a thing as word by word to explain this phrase in English, bcs we English speakers use different wordings that is more suitable for a situation’s nuances.) Then again, we have to consider speakers’ closeness as well because in Korea, it’s a huge thing. If you don’t understand how this works, you won’t understand the nuances of a conversation. You’re bound to misunderstand. If you refuse to understand it then, I don’t think you want to respect their culture. Because again, this is a huge thing.

✰ 𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐚 ✰

12,631 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Bill Clinton Isn’t Just Involved In Raping Underage Children With Jeffrey Epstein On Epstein Island Interview Claiming Bill Clinton Involved In Murder, International Crack Cocaine Trafficking Alongside The CIA “Bill’s nose is like a vacuum cleaner in that cocaine pile” “Owes you fifty thousand dollars every time my wheels land. What are you talking about? He says, I can't get caught in Mena, Arkansas. And later on whenever I would, so he was working with, he had CIA connections, I don't know where he'd flown with, and also Bill Clinton was the government man or the governor. ‌ So I ain't seen nothing more about that. I hear that they call it Arkansas up there instead of Homicide. And plus, I don't know anything. I never met those gentlemen. I didn't fool with it. That was Barry's end of the story. But anybody wants to look, just read about what happened in MENA Arkansas. And that movie that they made that they called America Made was written as MENA. And when Hillary was running for president the Democratic Party stopped it, and even the director quit. And they changed part of the script, and they changed the name to America Made. The whole thing's about me and Arkansas and Bill Clinton and a couple of boys that got killed on a railroad track and put up there by the sheriff to get chopped up. And there's some stories there. They got Clinton'd. They claim it is him. ‌ I'm glad I didn't meet him. Looked like he was on a plane somewhere that he shouldn't have been here recently, too. Yep. He's got a couple paintings down there, too, from what I hear. Yeah. His brother, Roger, got caught with cocaine, and he pardoned him, but he didn't pardon me. And Roger Clinton says that Bill's nose is like a vacuum cleaner in that cocaine pile. ‌ But he didn't inhale. That's just a good point. That's, yeah, hey, you know. Presidents are just such fine people sometimes. They are some very trustworthy individuals, aren't they? They'll put you in prison. He went in and he raised the penalty for crack cocaine 100 times. They just say, just political prostitutes is all they are. Yeah. That's the word for them. I'm on, I like that. I'm going to use that. ‌ So Barry was tied in with the Clintons, the CIA, and he had free rein to land wherever he wants. He's not gonna get caught in Arkansas. Absolutely. So it was a little far to go up to Mena, so I talked to Escobar and him, and they said, well, that's no problem. So I landed there myself to do a load, and they put a fella named Benjamin Ben in the plane with me, and we went up to a landing strip there in Nicaragua. And I met the generals and all that. They said, land right here. Just come in, don't say a thing on the radio. Just land anytime you want to. And we'll refuel you and you get food, whatever you want. We'll wash you when children, you'll be on your way. So. How do you make these connections? I didn't make them in Ocho and Escobar. — I think they had used him over in Southeast Asia. It was a CIA conversion of some kind of a Piper plane. It was a CIA conversion and he had access? Right, they had made it and that's what they was flying over out of Burma and Vietnam behind the lines over there. They were real quiet. They put big, heavy, wide blade propellers on them and put Q-tips and you couldn't hear the propeller noise. No kidding. So they were I bought, I think, seven of them. It was $400,000 a piece. So were these open market? Yeah. You could buy them.” I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits but this is an excellent listen!

Bill Clinton Isn’t Just Involved In Raping Underage Children With Jeffrey Epstein On Epstein Island Interview Claiming Bill Clinton Involved In Murder, International Crack Cocaine Trafficking Alongside The CIA “Bill’s nose is like a vacuum cleaner in that cocaine pile” “Owes you fifty thousand dollars every time my wheels land. What are you talking about? He says, I can't get caught in Mena, Arkansas. And later on whenever I would, so he was working with, he had CIA connections, I don't know where he'd flown with, and also Bill Clinton was the government man or the governor. ‌ So I ain't seen nothing more about that. I hear that they call it Arkansas up there instead of Homicide. And plus, I don't know anything. I never met those gentlemen. I didn't fool with it. That was Barry's end of the story. But anybody wants to look, just read about what happened in MENA Arkansas. And that movie that they made that they called America Made was written as MENA. And when Hillary was running for president the Democratic Party stopped it, and even the director quit. And they changed part of the script, and they changed the name to America Made. The whole thing's about me and Arkansas and Bill Clinton and a couple of boys that got killed on a railroad track and put up there by the sheriff to get chopped up. And there's some stories there. They got Clinton'd. They claim it is him. ‌ I'm glad I didn't meet him. Looked like he was on a plane somewhere that he shouldn't have been here recently, too. Yep. He's got a couple paintings down there, too, from what I hear. Yeah. His brother, Roger, got caught with cocaine, and he pardoned him, but he didn't pardon me. And Roger Clinton says that Bill's nose is like a vacuum cleaner in that cocaine pile. ‌ But he didn't inhale. That's just a good point. That's, yeah, hey, you know. Presidents are just such fine people sometimes. They are some very trustworthy individuals, aren't they? They'll put you in prison. He went in and he raised the penalty for crack cocaine 100 times. They just say, just political prostitutes is all they are. Yeah. That's the word for them. I'm on, I like that. I'm going to use that. ‌ So Barry was tied in with the Clintons, the CIA, and he had free rein to land wherever he wants. He's not gonna get caught in Arkansas. Absolutely. So it was a little far to go up to Mena, so I talked to Escobar and him, and they said, well, that's no problem. So I landed there myself to do a load, and they put a fella named Benjamin Ben in the plane with me, and we went up to a landing strip there in Nicaragua. And I met the generals and all that. They said, land right here. Just come in, don't say a thing on the radio. Just land anytime you want to. And we'll refuel you and you get food, whatever you want. We'll wash you when children, you'll be on your way. So. How do you make these connections? I didn't make them in Ocho and Escobar. — I think they had used him over in Southeast Asia. It was a CIA conversion of some kind of a Piper plane. It was a CIA conversion and he had access? Right, they had made it and that's what they was flying over out of Burma and Vietnam behind the lines over there. They were real quiet. They put big, heavy, wide blade propellers on them and put Q-tips and you couldn't hear the propeller noise. No kidding. So they were I bought, I think, seven of them. It was $400,000 a piece. So were these open market? Yeah. You could buy them.” I can’t transcribe it all due to X’s text limits but this is an excellent listen!

Wall Street Apes

2,288,690 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Is it still daddy? Many of you have shared videos with me recently, depicting young children’s reactions to dramatic changes in their parents’ appearances. Especially in cases where fathers are heavily bearded - then unexpectedly reveal clean shaven faces (which their toddlers may literally never have seen) - the reaction is often one of dismay…which is why I’m typically reluctant to share them. This video - which isn’t nearly as startling - does a nice job of illustrating the child’s perspective here. This father had only a mustache. But you’ll note his son’s apprehensive reaction to its removal. Intellectually he recognizes what’s happened, asking whether Dad has shaved his mustache. But it’s clear that emotionally, he finds the episode a little jarring… even going so far as to ask if “it’s still daddy?” - which is really the crux of the matter in all these videos. Your face is particularly precious to your child. Beginning in infancy, it is a favorite sight. A source of both comfort and learning. And your distinguishing features are part of what make it so familiar to your child. So it’s no surprise that sudden changes in appearance can leave little ones feeling uncertain. This doesn’t mean that you can’t change your facial hair or hairstyle as a parent. But there are definitely more and less sensitive ways to do so. The wrong way, for sure (as seen in many other videos) is to shave a full beard without warning, to cover one’s face with a cloth, and then have a toddler remove it only to reveal that they are being held by (from their perspective) an unfamiliar adult they believed to be their parent. Talk about stranger danger. This dad handles the situation with considerably more tact and with a little older child, but even here there is little question our hero is apprehensive about the change. He’ll adjust quickly… but it’s still an adjustment. How might such a change be undertaken with the greatest sensitivity? First, involve your child in conversation on the front end, over a period of days. Explain why you are considering such a change (it’s hot and itchy, for example) and consider making it gradually, perhaps over the course of a weekend. A thick bushy beard might begin with a significant trim, allowing your child to acclimate in stages to your changing appearance. Better yet, involve your child in the stages of the trimming itself. The end result may still be a little jarring at first, but you’ll be surprised how much a little foreknowledge, involvement, and sense of ownership on may make a difference in their reaction. How have you handled such appearance changes in your home? Any additional tips to share? This clean shaven dad was shared to IG by therealprofessorx.

Is it still daddy? Many of you have shared videos with me recently, depicting young children’s reactions to dramatic changes in their parents’ appearances. Especially in cases where fathers are heavily bearded - then unexpectedly reveal clean shaven faces (which their toddlers may literally never have seen) - the reaction is often one of dismay…which is why I’m typically reluctant to share them. This video - which isn’t nearly as startling - does a nice job of illustrating the child’s perspective here. This father had only a mustache. But you’ll note his son’s apprehensive reaction to its removal. Intellectually he recognizes what’s happened, asking whether Dad has shaved his mustache. But it’s clear that emotionally, he finds the episode a little jarring… even going so far as to ask if “it’s still daddy?” - which is really the crux of the matter in all these videos. Your face is particularly precious to your child. Beginning in infancy, it is a favorite sight. A source of both comfort and learning. And your distinguishing features are part of what make it so familiar to your child. So it’s no surprise that sudden changes in appearance can leave little ones feeling uncertain. This doesn’t mean that you can’t change your facial hair or hairstyle as a parent. But there are definitely more and less sensitive ways to do so. The wrong way, for sure (as seen in many other videos) is to shave a full beard without warning, to cover one’s face with a cloth, and then have a toddler remove it only to reveal that they are being held by (from their perspective) an unfamiliar adult they believed to be their parent. Talk about stranger danger. This dad handles the situation with considerably more tact and with a little older child, but even here there is little question our hero is apprehensive about the change. He’ll adjust quickly… but it’s still an adjustment. How might such a change be undertaken with the greatest sensitivity? First, involve your child in conversation on the front end, over a period of days. Explain why you are considering such a change (it’s hot and itchy, for example) and consider making it gradually, perhaps over the course of a weekend. A thick bushy beard might begin with a significant trim, allowing your child to acclimate in stages to your changing appearance. Better yet, involve your child in the stages of the trimming itself. The end result may still be a little jarring at first, but you’ll be surprised how much a little foreknowledge, involvement, and sense of ownership on may make a difference in their reaction. How have you handled such appearance changes in your home? Any additional tips to share? This clean shaven dad was shared to IG by therealprofessorx.

Dan Wuori

392,656 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren