Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Controlled Demolition? BBC Pre-Knowledge? Ron Johnson Says It’s Time to Reopen 9/11 It took over two decades—but someone in D.C. is finally asking the right questions. Senator Ron Johnson is calling for a full investigation into everything we weren’t allowed to question: “Why did they just get rid of...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,814,457 subscribers

54,866 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikWissenschaft & TechnologieBildung
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 1 Jahr

More Stories: Leaked Audio: Verging on Tears, DNC Chair Tells Hogg "I Don’t Know If I Wanna Do This Anymore"

Profilbild von The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊vor 1 Jahr

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today

Profilbild von Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilante
Louis Berry, Writer, Task Force Vigilantevor 2 Jahren

John and Mayme Surrency were murdered the day before Thanksgiving 1936. Garland Headley was tasked with prosecuting the three men involved. What he uncovered sent him and his family fleeing the United States. What did John and Mayme know that led to their murder?

Profilbild von cengiz temi
cengiz temivor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson They've also hidden the dancing Israeli's. The government doesn't want to acknowledge that.

Profilbild von Yun ♡
Yun ♡vor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson funny how asking questions about 9/11 makes you a conspiracy theorist but blindly trusting gov makes you patriotic

Profilbild von Kalen
Kalenvor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson It's way overdue

Profilbild von Tent in Quarantino
Tent in Quarantinovor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson This is moron bait. Efforts should be focused on destroying NGOs funding anti-American activities

Profilbild von Maui_gal
Maui_galvor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson Didn't believe the outlandish Narratives within days

Profilbild von Nathan A. M.
Nathan A. M.vor 1 Jahr

Chris Mohr, from Skeptic Magazine, has an excellent series of videos on 9/11, where he explores it thoroughly. He's very scientifically minded but also very respectful of opposing points of view. I think his conclusions are very well investigated, well thought out and are probably the correct ones.

Profilbild von Nathan Ednie
Nathan Ednievor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson Controlled demolition theories need real answers. BBC knew too much too soon. Ron Johnson is right to reopen 9/11. Truth matters.

Profilbild von Ultra Maga Michaelene-now TruthSocial @pixellizard
Ultra Maga Michaelene-now TruthSocial @pixellizardvor 1 Jahr

@SenRonJohnson Needs to be opened because WE KNOW it was an inside job. Time to hold them ALL accountable!

Ähnliche Videos

#9 – Senator Ron Johnson says Building 7 “sure looks like CONTROLLED DEMOLITION to me.” The official story about Building 7 states that it collapsed due to “office fires.” But when you dig your nose in “conspiracy land,” you learn that hundreds of architects, engineers, and even eyewitnesses argue it looked and sounded like a classic controlled demolition. Johnson told James Corbett that asking legitimate questions results in instant backlash, which he said “just raises my suspicion level.” “The Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who know the history of these steel buildings not coming down because of basic fires—you need SOMETHING ELSE,” Johnson declared. “You see the video and you go, ‘sure looks like controlled demolition to me.’” Johnson wants to know why we can’t even ask such questions about 9/11. His conclusion is that “people don’t want to know the answer.”
2:03

#9 – Senator Ron Johnson says Building 7 “sure looks like CONTROLLED DEMOLITION to me.” The official story about Building 7 states that it collapsed due to “office fires.” But when you dig your nose in “conspiracy land,” you learn that hundreds of architects, engineers, and even eyewitnesses argue it looked and sounded like a classic controlled demolition. Johnson told James Corbett that asking legitimate questions results in instant backlash, which he said “just raises my suspicion level.” “The Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who know the history of these steel buildings not coming down because of basic fires—you need SOMETHING ELSE,” Johnson declared. “You see the video and you go, ‘sure looks like controlled demolition to me.’” Johnson wants to know why we can’t even ask such questions about 9/11. His conclusion is that “people don’t want to know the answer.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

32,756 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Senator Ron Johnson just dropped a major hint that 9/11 may have been an inside job—specifically pointing to Building 7 as a likely controlled demolition. He’s demanding answers on who ordered the removal of critical evidence and what they were trying to hide. Johnson vows to go public with everything he uncovers and is calling on the FBI to release the full, unredacted 9/11 files.
1:47

Senator Ron Johnson just dropped a major hint that 9/11 may have been an inside job—specifically pointing to Building 7 as a likely controlled demolition. He’s demanding answers on who ordered the removal of critical evidence and what they were trying to hide. Johnson vows to go public with everything he uncovers and is calling on the FBI to release the full, unredacted 9/11 files.

Shadow of Ezra

113,255 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“The Truth Will Set Us Free”: 9/11 Truth Group Calls for New Investigation Speaking outside the The White House on 9/11, members of the 9/11 Truth Organization told LindellTV’s Cara Castronuova that Building 7 and the Twin Towers showed signs of controlled demolition. They pointed to firefighters’ testimonies, support from Ron Johnson and former Rep. Dennis Kucinich, and said Tucker Carlson is producing a documentary on their findings. “We just have to keep talking about it until there is a mass awakening,” one member said.
11:00

“The Truth Will Set Us Free”: 9/11 Truth Group Calls for New Investigation Speaking outside the The White House on 9/11, members of the 9/11 Truth Organization told LindellTV’s Cara Castronuova that Building 7 and the Twin Towers showed signs of controlled demolition. They pointed to firefighters’ testimonies, support from Ron Johnson and former Rep. Dennis Kucinich, and said Tucker Carlson is producing a documentary on their findings. “We just have to keep talking about it until there is a mass awakening,” one member said.

LindellTV

24,397 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Senator Ron Johnson: "I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later, I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, 'Sure, looks like controlled demolition to me.'... so why can't [we] even ask these questions?" This clip of sitting Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to The Official Corbett Report Rumble channel on September 7, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I'm just asking these very legitimate questions. Why can't we do that? Which of course just raises my suspicion level. So that's, that's pretty well the, you know, you're the expert in this. I mean the Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who, who know the history of, you know, these steel buildings not coming down because basically fires. You need something else. "The first time I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, sure, looks like controlled demolition to me. "And then you start watching the documentaries and you hear about the structural engineering professor, up in Alaska doing a four year study on that completely refutes what NIST, study, hear about the 9/11 Commission. Again, I can just go on and on. I'm not an expert on this. I've just heard all the questions, and they sound completely legitimate to me. "And so you ask yourself the question, so why can't even ask these questions? I think an interesting component of this is because people don't want to know the answer. I mean, it opens up, which I can, completely understand from the position of the President of the United States, our relationship with foreign— I can certainly understand why, if the truth were ever known, we may want to just slam that Pandora's box closed. So that's kind of the position we're in right now. "I think the questions are legitimate. They've been raised. People don't want the answers. A lot of people do, but a lot of people don't."
1:47

Senator Ron Johnson: "I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later, I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, 'Sure, looks like controlled demolition to me.'... so why can't [we] even ask these questions?" This clip of sitting Senator from Wisconsin Ron Johnson (Senator Ron Johnson) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to The Official Corbett Report Rumble channel on September 7, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I'm just asking these very legitimate questions. Why can't we do that? Which of course just raises my suspicion level. So that's, that's pretty well the, you know, you're the expert in this. I mean the Richard Gages of the world, the structural engineers, the firefighters who, who know the history of, you know, these steel buildings not coming down because basically fires. You need something else. "The first time I'd never even heard of Building 7. Twenty years later I had never heard of Building 7. And all of a sudden you see the video and you go, sure, looks like controlled demolition to me. "And then you start watching the documentaries and you hear about the structural engineering professor, up in Alaska doing a four year study on that completely refutes what NIST, study, hear about the 9/11 Commission. Again, I can just go on and on. I'm not an expert on this. I've just heard all the questions, and they sound completely legitimate to me. "And so you ask yourself the question, so why can't even ask these questions? I think an interesting component of this is because people don't want to know the answer. I mean, it opens up, which I can, completely understand from the position of the President of the United States, our relationship with foreign— I can certainly understand why, if the truth were ever known, we may want to just slam that Pandora's box closed. So that's kind of the position we're in right now. "I think the questions are legitimate. They've been raised. People don't want the answers. A lot of people do, but a lot of people don't."

Sense Receptor

35,572 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Uh oh…. 👀 🚨 Senator Ron Johnson says it looks to him like Tower 7 was taken down via Controlled Demolition He describes when it all went down, the only thing you had at the time was the MSM and he bought it hook, line, and sinker. He says he never even heard about Tower 7 until many years later: “Most Americans didn’t even know another tower collapsed that day.. because the entire focus was on the Twin Towers — then you have a BBC reporter talking about it collapsing and it’s still standing over her left shoulder. And if you look at it, it sure looks like a controlled demolition. Experts say it looks like a controlled demolition.” Clip Full Interview
4:22

Uh oh…. 👀 🚨 Senator Ron Johnson says it looks to him like Tower 7 was taken down via Controlled Demolition He describes when it all went down, the only thing you had at the time was the MSM and he bought it hook, line, and sinker. He says he never even heard about Tower 7 until many years later: “Most Americans didn’t even know another tower collapsed that day.. because the entire focus was on the Twin Towers — then you have a BBC reporter talking about it collapsing and it’s still standing over her left shoulder. And if you look at it, it sure looks like a controlled demolition. Experts say it looks like a controlled demolition.” Clip Full Interview

MJTruthUltra

270,186 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

One of the best proofs, that 9/11 wasn't a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanisms, are the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower. 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.
2:01

One of the best proofs, that 9/11 wasn't a structural failure (collapse), or a controlled demolition, using any thermal or kinetic mechanisms, are the 16 survivors in stairwell B of the North Tower. 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF the building is gone into a HUGE DUST cloud.

9/11 Revisited

1,281,584 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Senator Ron Johnson says HHS gave him evidence showing the CDC and Big Pharma hid Covid vaccine adverse event data. “We forced them to deliver close to 11 million pages of documents.” “Early on, we discovered that CDC saw a signal for myocarditis and hid it.” “They had a safety signal for ischemic stroke in people over 65… did they announce that to the public? No. They hid it.” “They knew that their analysis systems would mask the adverse events.” “We are only at the beginning of this investigation to uncover the cover-up.” “It was a coordinated grotesque cover-up.” Senator Ron Johnson
3:55

Senator Ron Johnson says HHS gave him evidence showing the CDC and Big Pharma hid Covid vaccine adverse event data. “We forced them to deliver close to 11 million pages of documents.” “Early on, we discovered that CDC saw a signal for myocarditis and hid it.” “They had a safety signal for ischemic stroke in people over 65… did they announce that to the public? No. They hid it.” “They knew that their analysis systems would mask the adverse events.” “We are only at the beginning of this investigation to uncover the cover-up.” “It was a coordinated grotesque cover-up.” Senator Ron Johnson

End Tribalism in Politics

14,264 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Building 7 Did Not Kill Itself: Richard Gage, AIA on DarkHorse 00:00:00 Welcoming Richard Gage to DarkHorse 00:04:41 Richard Gage’s Journey into 9/11 Activism 00:18:32 The Evidence 00:21:11 Building 7: Did you know about it? 00:29:16 Controlled Demolitions & WTC Building 7 00:52:11 Evidence of Extreme Heat 01:12:08 Proof of Controlled Demolition: WTC Building 7 01:16:00 WTC Twin Towers 01:38:22 Fraud Found, but NO Revisions 01:44:27 Fireproofing Upgrades? 01:53:50 Proof of Controlled Demolition: WTC Twin Towers 01:55:07 Why This is Still Important 02:00:55 A Proper 9/11 Investigation is Justified 02:03:24 Danny Jowenko
2:10:49

Building 7 Did Not Kill Itself: Richard Gage, AIA on DarkHorse 00:00:00 Welcoming Richard Gage to DarkHorse 00:04:41 Richard Gage’s Journey into 9/11 Activism 00:18:32 The Evidence 00:21:11 Building 7: Did you know about it? 00:29:16 Controlled Demolitions & WTC Building 7 00:52:11 Evidence of Extreme Heat 01:12:08 Proof of Controlled Demolition: WTC Building 7 01:16:00 WTC Twin Towers 01:38:22 Fraud Found, but NO Revisions 01:44:27 Fireproofing Upgrades? 01:53:50 Proof of Controlled Demolition: WTC Twin Towers 01:55:07 Why This is Still Important 02:00:55 A Proper 9/11 Investigation is Justified 02:03:24 Danny Jowenko

The Darkhorse Podcast

50,263 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Senator Ron Johnson says Debate on The SAVE America Act Could Last for ‘WEEKS’: “It could, it should. It deserves it. Election integrity is the bedrock of a functioning democracy and republic. Without it, we’re toast… that’s what Democrats want. They don’t want election integrity. They want to cheat because they want to turn this into a one party nation. That is their goal, that’s why they opened up the border and allowed millions to flood in. It’s their game plan.”
2:35

Senator Ron Johnson says Debate on The SAVE America Act Could Last for ‘WEEKS’: “It could, it should. It deserves it. Election integrity is the bedrock of a functioning democracy and republic. Without it, we’re toast… that’s what Democrats want. They don’t want election integrity. They want to cheat because they want to turn this into a one party nation. That is their goal, that’s why they opened up the border and allowed millions to flood in. It’s their game plan.”

Benny Johnson

34,091 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

*** Breaking: Tucker Carlson Taking on 9/11 Truth with Senator Ron Johnson "Molten Metal....Thermite....Building 7....Controlled Demolition....4-year University of Alaska Study....Barry Jennings....156 Witnesses of Explosions....Corruption....Lies....Cover-up..." We’re making significant progress now! That cannot be denied. We have a sitting Senator drawing attention (as the Chairman of Homeland Security, the Chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and the Chairman of the Senate Oversight Committee) in today’s major interview with Tucker Carlson, to: 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions — many before the towers descended — omitted from the NIST report “…Molten Steel in the Twin Towers” — (seen pouring out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse) “The ash [WTC Dust] contains residue of both burnt and unburnt [nano]thermite.” Building 7 as a clear Controlled Demolition — “the only way that happens is if you blow up all their supports at the same time.” “….iron spheres with extreme temperatures.” “It wouldn’t come down so symmetrically. You wouldn’t have a free fall.” Major witnesses of explosions such as “Barry Jennings” “It was literally predicted to come down.” “Alaskan structural engineering professor [Hulsey] does a four-year study on it that pretty well debunks the NIST analysis.” Truth of 9/11 was covered up by the 9/11 Commission… “set up to fail” “Nothing's adding up. I mean…structurally, just basic engineering, basic physics, it doesn't make sense.” “They are very effective at marginalizing and discrediting anybody who's asked the questions.” “The firefighters want to know [the truth about 9/11].” “You talk to guys like Richard Gage, the [former] head of Architects [& Engineers] for 9/11 Truth.” I’m awfully glad that the senator asked me to sit down with him on a Zoom call and review all of the above evidence with him the day before this major interview! And Tucker, for his part, admitted yet again, “Because I was part of the coverup and I feel guilty about it, that's why, and I'm trying to atone for my previous sins.” Learn more and Support RichardGage911 [dot] org
17:49

*** Breaking: Tucker Carlson Taking on 9/11 Truth with Senator Ron Johnson "Molten Metal....Thermite....Building 7....Controlled Demolition....4-year University of Alaska Study....Barry Jennings....156 Witnesses of Explosions....Corruption....Lies....Cover-up..." We’re making significant progress now! That cannot be denied. We have a sitting Senator drawing attention (as the Chairman of Homeland Security, the Chair of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and the Chairman of the Senate Oversight Committee) in today’s major interview with Tucker Carlson, to: 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions — many before the towers descended — omitted from the NIST report “…Molten Steel in the Twin Towers” — (seen pouring out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse) “The ash [WTC Dust] contains residue of both burnt and unburnt [nano]thermite.” Building 7 as a clear Controlled Demolition — “the only way that happens is if you blow up all their supports at the same time.” “….iron spheres with extreme temperatures.” “It wouldn’t come down so symmetrically. You wouldn’t have a free fall.” Major witnesses of explosions such as “Barry Jennings” “It was literally predicted to come down.” “Alaskan structural engineering professor [Hulsey] does a four-year study on it that pretty well debunks the NIST analysis.” Truth of 9/11 was covered up by the 9/11 Commission… “set up to fail” “Nothing's adding up. I mean…structurally, just basic engineering, basic physics, it doesn't make sense.” “They are very effective at marginalizing and discrediting anybody who's asked the questions.” “The firefighters want to know [the truth about 9/11].” “You talk to guys like Richard Gage, the [former] head of Architects [& Engineers] for 9/11 Truth.” I’m awfully glad that the senator asked me to sit down with him on a Zoom call and review all of the above evidence with him the day before this major interview! And Tucker, for his part, admitted yet again, “Because I was part of the coverup and I feel guilty about it, that's why, and I'm trying to atone for my previous sins.” Learn more and Support RichardGage911 [dot] org

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

82,751 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,190 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[RG911Team] It’s so obvious now. On 9/11, we didn’t think about it because we were in shock. Now we ask: 1) Why didn’t fire crews or building management know this skyscraper was going to collapse? 2) How did steel building columns get ejected hundreds of meters away during the collapse of this skyscraper? 3) If the falling floors ejected these columns sideways, why is there no stack of floors in the rubble pile? 4) Why didn’t the government test for explosive residue - especially given the Twin Towers were bombed by terrorists in 1993? 5) Why was most of the debris shipped overseas for recycling before investigators could inspect it? 6) Why did John Skilling, chief structural engineer of the Twin Towers, state the buildings were designed to survive airliner impacts? 7) Why did architect Francis De Martini, construction manager for the World Trade Center, say the same thing? Why was he so confident that he stayed in the Towers on 9/11 instead of escaping? 8) Why are people attacked by the media for asking these legitimate questions?
0:39

[RG911Team] It’s so obvious now. On 9/11, we didn’t think about it because we were in shock. Now we ask: 1) Why didn’t fire crews or building management know this skyscraper was going to collapse? 2) How did steel building columns get ejected hundreds of meters away during the collapse of this skyscraper? 3) If the falling floors ejected these columns sideways, why is there no stack of floors in the rubble pile? 4) Why didn’t the government test for explosive residue - especially given the Twin Towers were bombed by terrorists in 1993? 5) Why was most of the debris shipped overseas for recycling before investigators could inspect it? 6) Why did John Skilling, chief structural engineer of the Twin Towers, state the buildings were designed to survive airliner impacts? 7) Why did architect Francis De Martini, construction manager for the World Trade Center, say the same thing? Why was he so confident that he stayed in the Towers on 9/11 instead of escaping? 8) Why are people attacked by the media for asking these legitimate questions?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

214,689 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Miranda Devine: "The country still doesn't know anything about [Trump assassin Thomas Crooks]...what is going on there? And why did you have to subpoena Kash Patel's FBI in July to get any information?" Sen. Ron Johnson: "My assumption was...when President Trump takes office...he's going to make sure that his FBI director and people around him are going to get to the bottom of this...All of the sudden, I realized...I haven't heard a peep out of this. What do [Crooks'] social media accounts say? Why haven't we unlocked this information? Why doesn't America know more about it? 'Cause again, there's some odd things about it...Bizarre stuff. Explain this to us." Devine: "But why did you have to subpoena the FBI?" Johnson: "My subpoenas to this administration are friendly subpoenas, just to kind of prompt action. Part of the problem...it is a Deep State. It is a pervasive Deep State...and it's populated, primarily, by partisan leftists."
3:16

Miranda Devine: "The country still doesn't know anything about [Trump assassin Thomas Crooks]...what is going on there? And why did you have to subpoena Kash Patel's FBI in July to get any information?" Sen. Ron Johnson: "My assumption was...when President Trump takes office...he's going to make sure that his FBI director and people around him are going to get to the bottom of this...All of the sudden, I realized...I haven't heard a peep out of this. What do [Crooks'] social media accounts say? Why haven't we unlocked this information? Why doesn't America know more about it? 'Cause again, there's some odd things about it...Bizarre stuff. Explain this to us." Devine: "But why did you have to subpoena the FBI?" Johnson: "My subpoenas to this administration are friendly subpoenas, just to kind of prompt action. Part of the problem...it is a Deep State. It is a pervasive Deep State...and it's populated, primarily, by partisan leftists."

Julia 🇺🇸

21,134 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

[RG911Team] This shocking 9/11 testimony was suppressed for years. Now we know why. It’s award-winning CBS reporter Carol Marin, minutes after escaping the collapse of the Twin Towers. Her suit is still covered in dust. But she says things that blow a hole in the official story. Now that Senator Ron Johnson is considering starting new 9/11 hearings based on this kind of evidence, someone needs to get in touch with her ASAP. Her account is critical to understanding what really happened on that fateful day.
1:18

[RG911Team] This shocking 9/11 testimony was suppressed for years. Now we know why. It’s award-winning CBS reporter Carol Marin, minutes after escaping the collapse of the Twin Towers. Her suit is still covered in dust. But she says things that blow a hole in the official story. Now that Senator Ron Johnson is considering starting new 9/11 hearings based on this kind of evidence, someone needs to get in touch with her ASAP. Her account is critical to understanding what really happened on that fateful day.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

260,451 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸 SEN. JOHNSON CALLS FOR RIGOROUS INTERNAL INVESTIGATION OF BIDEN FBI "I'm absolutely dedicated to getting to the bottom of this and let me finish on this note - I've been investigating and doing these investigations for over 10 years. I've heard a lot of my colleagues call for a special counsel or for criminal investigations. Maybe at some point in time that should not be the first step because my experience with special counsels or formal criminal investigations - everybody clams up, Congress has no access to information, to documents or witnesses. So, what first must occur is a rigorous internal investigation. Give the FBI, Department of Justice, time to do an internal investigation, find out the documents, identify the people that then get turned over to Congress for review of the documents, for depositions and hearings with those individuals, and finally for release and exposure to the American public." Source: Senator Ron Johnson, Fox News
1:19

🇺🇸 SEN. JOHNSON CALLS FOR RIGOROUS INTERNAL INVESTIGATION OF BIDEN FBI "I'm absolutely dedicated to getting to the bottom of this and let me finish on this note - I've been investigating and doing these investigations for over 10 years. I've heard a lot of my colleagues call for a special counsel or for criminal investigations. Maybe at some point in time that should not be the first step because my experience with special counsels or formal criminal investigations - everybody clams up, Congress has no access to information, to documents or witnesses. So, what first must occur is a rigorous internal investigation. Give the FBI, Department of Justice, time to do an internal investigation, find out the documents, identify the people that then get turned over to Congress for review of the documents, for depositions and hearings with those individuals, and finally for release and exposure to the American public." Source: Senator Ron Johnson, Fox News

Mario Nawfal

70,783 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Delta CEO Ed Bastian: “Given the lack of leadership that we’ve seen coming from our elected officials. The fact that we would continue to extend courtesy opportunities [for members of Congress] to bypass the mess that they’ve created. We want to make sure they understand—and stand in [TSA] lines just like everybody else.” “I think [members of Congress] understand why we had to do what we did.” Fox & Friends: “I don’t think they deserve the perks.” House Speaker Mike Johnson: “No… I agree 100%. The airlines are right.”
1:01

Delta CEO Ed Bastian: “Given the lack of leadership that we’ve seen coming from our elected officials. The fact that we would continue to extend courtesy opportunities [for members of Congress] to bypass the mess that they’ve created. We want to make sure they understand—and stand in [TSA] lines just like everybody else.” “I think [members of Congress] understand why we had to do what we did.” Fox & Friends: “I don’t think they deserve the perks.” House Speaker Mike Johnson: “No… I agree 100%. The airlines are right.”

RedWave Press

266,697 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Jimmy Dore interviews RG911/AE911 - The Hard WTC Evidence - Official 9/11 Story COLLAPSING! Bringing Tens of Thousands of Newcomers to the 9/11 Truth | Watch along with them! — 45 Minutes Jimmy posted today our LIVE interview with him from the other day. He encouraged us to share all the evidence we could in our limited time with him - and we did! I was joined by structural engineer Kamal Obeid from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth who addressed key issues including the impossibility of the free-fall collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. We addressed as many key points as we possibly could in the 45 minutes that we had: 1. The importance of the truth-telling that WI Senator Ron Johnson and former Congressman Curt Weldon are all about right now. Jimmy played excerpts of the Senator’s WTC comments on The Benny Show including “molten metal…controlled demolition…Calling Out Bravo 7 documentary.” We are making sure that the Senator has the solid body of evidence that will back up his historic efforts to get a real 9/11 investigation. We addressed these questions among many others on Jimmy Dore: 1. Why didn’t the American Institute of Architects issue even one bulletin on the catastrophic unprecedented destruction of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — the third worst structural failure in history? 2. Why didn’t NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) include in their 2004 report on the Twin Towers the 156 first responders who saw, heard, and experienced explosions? And many of them before the collapse of the towers? 3. Why did NIST persist with their theory that the top section crush the building section below while maintaining a near free-fall acceleration (when the top section was in fact destroyed in the first 3 seconds) — as if 90% of the steel gave no resistance whatsoever? 4. What caused the hundreds of laterally-ejected freely-flying 4-ton structural steel sections, at 80mph, landing 600 feet in every direction impaling themselves in skyscrapers all around them? 5. What cause the complete pulverization of 110 acre-sized concrete floors — 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower, and dispersed it from river to river across Lower Manhattan? 6. What was crushing the lower section of each tower, if the above steel and concrete, which was 2/3 of their weight, was NOT even available to crush it?! The above questions were just the beginning of the 7-dozen key points of forensic, video, and eyewitness testimony that we laid on Jimmy. Please let us know how you think we did. There’s always room for improvement. Learn more about the WTC evidence at We send out to YOU another huge thanks to those who funding our new PR professional who has already obtained a number of interviews for us in addition to the big one. They keep stacking up! Jeff Crouere on Ringside Politics / — 5/1/25 & 5/2/25 Jake Smith of — May 2 Carrie Abbott of — May 5 Mike Dakak of the — May 7 Jeff Rense / — 7pm Pacific, May 12 B. Cullum of The National Security Hour / America Out Loud Network — 11am Pacific, May 12 Quite Frankly Podcast / — 4pm Pacific, Monday May 19 We rely on YOUR support to continue reaching out to the millions every year who are getting the best 9/11 truth evidence available. Won’t you support us and keep the interviews coming? Keep On Air!
43:59

Jimmy Dore interviews RG911/AE911 - The Hard WTC Evidence - Official 9/11 Story COLLAPSING! Bringing Tens of Thousands of Newcomers to the 9/11 Truth | Watch along with them! — 45 Minutes Jimmy posted today our LIVE interview with him from the other day. He encouraged us to share all the evidence we could in our limited time with him - and we did! I was joined by structural engineer Kamal Obeid from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth who addressed key issues including the impossibility of the free-fall collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. We addressed as many key points as we possibly could in the 45 minutes that we had: 1. The importance of the truth-telling that WI Senator Ron Johnson and former Congressman Curt Weldon are all about right now. Jimmy played excerpts of the Senator’s WTC comments on The Benny Show including “molten metal…controlled demolition…Calling Out Bravo 7 documentary.” We are making sure that the Senator has the solid body of evidence that will back up his historic efforts to get a real 9/11 investigation. We addressed these questions among many others on Jimmy Dore: 1. Why didn’t the American Institute of Architects issue even one bulletin on the catastrophic unprecedented destruction of 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 — the third worst structural failure in history? 2. Why didn’t NIST (National Institute of Standards & Technology) include in their 2004 report on the Twin Towers the 156 first responders who saw, heard, and experienced explosions? And many of them before the collapse of the towers? 3. Why did NIST persist with their theory that the top section crush the building section below while maintaining a near free-fall acceleration (when the top section was in fact destroyed in the first 3 seconds) — as if 90% of the steel gave no resistance whatsoever? 4. What caused the hundreds of laterally-ejected freely-flying 4-ton structural steel sections, at 80mph, landing 600 feet in every direction impaling themselves in skyscrapers all around them? 5. What cause the complete pulverization of 110 acre-sized concrete floors — 90,000 tons of concrete in each tower, and dispersed it from river to river across Lower Manhattan? 6. What was crushing the lower section of each tower, if the above steel and concrete, which was 2/3 of their weight, was NOT even available to crush it?! The above questions were just the beginning of the 7-dozen key points of forensic, video, and eyewitness testimony that we laid on Jimmy. Please let us know how you think we did. There’s always room for improvement. Learn more about the WTC evidence at We send out to YOU another huge thanks to those who funding our new PR professional who has already obtained a number of interviews for us in addition to the big one. They keep stacking up! Jeff Crouere on Ringside Politics / — 5/1/25 & 5/2/25 Jake Smith of — May 2 Carrie Abbott of — May 5 Mike Dakak of the — May 7 Jeff Rense / — 7pm Pacific, May 12 B. Cullum of The National Security Hour / America Out Loud Network — 11am Pacific, May 12 Quite Frankly Podcast / — 4pm Pacific, Monday May 19 We rely on YOUR support to continue reaching out to the millions every year who are getting the best 9/11 truth evidence available. Won’t you support us and keep the interviews coming? Keep On Air!

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

29,413 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr