Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Convincing argument 😂
289,049 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
34 Kommentare

These comments are why we need a pointer finger, yall retarded. The person who has the right of way is not at fault

Yes, this person had the right of way and the car pulling out of the gas station is at fault. However, I have to say that it does appear that you had time to stop or significantly slow down to limit the amount of contact. Tapping is annoying.

FTYROW - Private drive. Car leaving lot at fault. This isn’t hard.

These finger pointer videos are annoying.

Having a green light at the intersection doesn't mean anything here. That being said the person leaving the gas station is at fault

If you make your videos using a little pointer hand, you are a retard.

you have eyes right and a hand, but do you also have functioning brain? People make mistakes, you particularly kept on accelerating and not anticipating his moves. You could have stopped in time easily but you didn't. No one won by being "right".

I don’t know who started the finger pointer trend, but tapping it like a crazy person doesn’t help your case. It’s like clapping while pronouncing every syllable in words that you’re probably using incorrectly.

Are you the one pulling out of the gas station? If yes, then: yes you are wrong.

I don't know the exact rules in the USA, but here in Germany it would be a clear case and the silver car would be 100% at fault, regardless of the chance to brake or whatever. Entering the road from something like a driveway or a gas station comes with an automatic "Yield" sign.

I suppose one could argue that Captain Finger could have avoided the accident but I don't think that is a convincing assertion. What is 100% accurate, however, is that SUV committed a failure to yield moving violation that caused the accident.

Police reports are hearsay. Just get in front of the judge and put on evidence.

This version of the video is what should be played in court. "I do not require an attorney, I can represent myself."

Why did he speed up after the idiot pulled out in front of him? When the car pulls out, he stops the video and he's going 18 MPH. He's far enough that had he slammed on his brakes, he should have been able to stop. But instead of braking, he speeds up and is doing 21 MPH when he hits the car. Because he increased speed after the car pulled out, it's clear that he didn't see the car pull out. I would assign blame to both. Had he hit his brakes and still hit the car, the blame would be 100% on the car pulling out.

The tapping is infuriating.

this little hand tapping the screen is obnoxious as fuck. is this driver a blind idiot? how did he not even attempt to stop/break and just rams the car that pulled out? the real answer is they are both in the wrong. I suspect the insurance companies will say its about 25% his fault

I get the impression from the replies that some people don't understand you can pause a video. Morons talking out their asses about how the driver should have predicted what the other car would do and slow down are acting like the actual movement didn't take less than 2 seconds.

What's funny is w/o words, the poster is stating the obvious. What's sad is all of the ones replying who evidently hate agreeing to the obvious.

To the people saying he was accelerating because "the speed increased" before the hit, there is a delay to the speedometer on the bottom right of about 1 to 2 seconds, you can see that at the 0:09 to 0:11 There was less than 1 second for the driver to notice and break in 0:30

The person pulling out of the gas station needs to yield the right of way. Defensive driving from the dash cam user would have at least reduced or minimized the amount of damage here, but doesn't change how much fault the person pulling into traffic had... which was 100%.

I would submit that video to your insurance. They will handle it. They don’t want to pay at all especially when you aren’t at fault. That cop is an absolute idiot.

The cops didn’t say this guy was wrong it’s just more clickbait.

Let me guess... the one on the grey car was a woman.

If you wouldn't of spent so much time tapping on the windshield with that pointer finger you would of been way past the car before he decided to pull out

treat the road like everyone is an idiot and doesnt see you, cause if you act like an idiot and act like you dont see them obviously ready to jump in front of you, then its your fault.

The Cops are for sure wrong. ANYONE turning onto a road HAS to YIELD to oncoming traffic....same for stupid fucks getting on a highway, the ones getting on Yield...not the rest of traffic

Idk how there are people like that driver coming from the gas station that wait until the very last second to merge, walk or start driving ONLY when you are about to go. Its like they wait until its the most inconvenient time for you to start moving

Love the absolute outrage being conveyed with no words. Just the agitated tapping of the Mickey Mouse pointer. 😂🤣

If you can avoid hitting someone then you do so. If you don't, and could have, that is failure to avoid an accident. In this case it appears both drivers are wrong.

Everyone has a duty to avoid an accident, even if you have the right of way. You were stopped when you first observed the other vehicle. You were not yet at speed limit. You hit that vehicle, they did not hit you. You could have prevented this accident.

just for this annoying video im gonna say you are in the wrong, god how annoying all that tapping was fuck you and watch where you drive moron

Show that to the insurance company and then show that to the judge. It’ll definitely be a different outcome.

yeah, that person pulling out is completely at fault.

Cop is wrong. The car pulling into traffic HAS TO YIELD.

