Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Cops cannot extend the stop without reasonable articulable suspicion, of a crime. Shuttlesworth versus the city of Birmingham, 1969, says that the sidewalk is first amendment territory. If I was wrong, he would've arrested me. It's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

15,320 subscribers

26,865 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I was arrested within five seconds. Here, I break down the unconstitutional arrest step-by-step. Once they take my camera, your camera is next It’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

I was arrested within five seconds. Here, I break down the unconstitutional arrest step-by-step. Once they take my camera, your camera is next It’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

23,948 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The simple fact is that in almost any town in America you can't drive to Speedway, 7-Eleven, quickie Mart at 3 o'clock in the morning without cops trying to shake you down for no reason. Don't worry, though, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

The simple fact is that in almost any town in America you can't drive to Speedway, 7-Eleven, quickie Mart at 3 o'clock in the morning without cops trying to shake you down for no reason. Don't worry, though, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

58,699 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

He was put in prison for 44 years by Karen and her sister. I’m not kidding. Karen. Don’t worry, though, the cops only kept “secret documents” that would have cleared him. But it’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

He was put in prison for 44 years by Karen and her sister. I’m not kidding. Karen. Don’t worry, though, the cops only kept “secret documents” that would have cleared him. But it’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

19,629 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

He pulled her over for a cracked windshield. And then he lost his shit after it was established that she did have a license. He said she didn't cause the computer was wrong, but she did. Don't worry, though, this could never happen to you, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

He pulled her over for a cracked windshield. And then he lost his shit after it was established that she did have a license. He said she didn't cause the computer was wrong, but she did. Don't worry, though, this could never happen to you, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

14,524 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

I've taught you. I've showed you. And, now I'll tell you again. There is an unelected court of men and a few women, who we don't vote for. That just decide for us. And they decided that you have to get out of the car in the name of government agent safety. Don't worry, though, it's just a few bad apples.. . #backtheblue

I've taught you. I've showed you. And, now I'll tell you again. There is an unelected court of men and a few women, who we don't vote for. That just decide for us. And they decided that you have to get out of the car in the name of government agent safety. Don't worry, though, it's just a few bad apples.. . #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

10,595 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

This man simply wanted to smoke a cigarette. An off-duty undercover pig saw a black man hand him a cigarette and decided he was suspicious. This is what followed. Oh, that's right- it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

This man simply wanted to smoke a cigarette. An off-duty undercover pig saw a black man hand him a cigarette and decided he was suspicious. This is what followed. Oh, that's right- it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

766,452 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Cop Sucker punches man. Don't worry though! It would never happen to you! Because everybody knows it's just a few bad apples! #BackTheBlue

Cop Sucker punches man. Don't worry though! It would never happen to you! Because everybody knows it's just a few bad apples! #BackTheBlue

DeletelawZ

24,408 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Chuck just wanted to go fishing. He violated a law in some way. So the cop decided he would electrocute him and almost burned him alive. Don’t worry though. It’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

Chuck just wanted to go fishing. He violated a law in some way. So the cop decided he would electrocute him and almost burned him alive. Don’t worry though. It’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

90,287 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

They Murdered this man. But don't worry it could never happen to you, or your loved one, because it's just a few bad apples. #BacktheBlue

Sensitive content

They Murdered this man. But don't worry it could never happen to you, or your loved one, because it's just a few bad apples. #BacktheBlue

DeletelawZ

309,570 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Case Vs Montana allows you to 187 anybody you don't like. Here's how. Thank You UN-Elected SCOTUS for being the dog shit the Founding Fathers intended you to be. The cops would never abuse this. Because there's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

Case Vs Montana allows you to 187 anybody you don't like. Here's how. Thank You UN-Elected SCOTUS for being the dog shit the Founding Fathers intended you to be. The cops would never abuse this. Because there's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

97,748 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Imagine you’re sitting at the gas station and then you’re surrounded by a bunch of pigs. They just attack you. But you probably don’t have anything to worry about. This could never happen to you because everybody knows it’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

Imagine you’re sitting at the gas station and then you’re surrounded by a bunch of pigs. They just attack you. But you probably don’t have anything to worry about. This could never happen to you because everybody knows it’s just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

162,437 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🚨DHS is already lying about Border Patrol’s illegal actions in Charlotte, NC. After video exposed agents assaulting a U.S. citizen, DHS claimed the man “refused lawful commands.” Except… those commands weren’t lawful at all. This man was racially profiled twice. The first time, he showed his ID and agents left. Then, when he returned to his car with food, a second group of agents approached him without any legal basis. Here are the laws Border Patrol violated: 👉Fourth Amendment Agents cannot detain someone without reasonable suspicion. Sitting in a parking lot, with takeout, is not a crime… and appearance alone is not reasonable suspicion. 👉No Warrant, No Probable Cause They had no warrant, no probable cause, and no articulable suspicion of any crime or immigration violation. Without that, they cannot order someone out of their vehicle. So their “commands” were not lawful. 👉Illegal Detention & Excessive Force Because the stop was unconstitutional, everything that followed was too… including: • breaking his car window • ripping him out of the vehicle • assaulting him • detaining him without legal justification This is exactly the kind of conduct the Supreme Court says violates the Fourth Amendment. And DHS claiming the man was “trying to distract agents,” when agents approached HIM, is beyond laughable. It’s a cover story… and a bad one.

🚨DHS is already lying about Border Patrol’s illegal actions in Charlotte, NC. After video exposed agents assaulting a U.S. citizen, DHS claimed the man “refused lawful commands.” Except… those commands weren’t lawful at all. This man was racially profiled twice. The first time, he showed his ID and agents left. Then, when he returned to his car with food, a second group of agents approached him without any legal basis. Here are the laws Border Patrol violated: 👉Fourth Amendment Agents cannot detain someone without reasonable suspicion. Sitting in a parking lot, with takeout, is not a crime… and appearance alone is not reasonable suspicion. 👉No Warrant, No Probable Cause They had no warrant, no probable cause, and no articulable suspicion of any crime or immigration violation. Without that, they cannot order someone out of their vehicle. So their “commands” were not lawful. 👉Illegal Detention & Excessive Force Because the stop was unconstitutional, everything that followed was too… including: • breaking his car window • ripping him out of the vehicle • assaulting him • detaining him without legal justification This is exactly the kind of conduct the Supreme Court says violates the Fourth Amendment. And DHS claiming the man was “trying to distract agents,” when agents approached HIM, is beyond laughable. It’s a cover story… and a bad one.

Jesus Freakin Congress

77,170 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Nikole Hannah-Jones: Paying reparations is an admission of the crime, but it's not an admission of the crime of a handful of bad apples or a few years of bad policy. It is the crime of the entire existence of the United States. That is why we see such a visceral fight against it.

Nikole Hannah-Jones: Paying reparations is an admission of the crime, but it's not an admission of the crime of a handful of bad apples or a few years of bad policy. It is the crime of the entire existence of the United States. That is why we see such a visceral fight against it.

Breitbart News

129,089 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Two Omaha officers get schooled on our rights. "Suspicion" isn't a crime, and filming in a public lobby isn't "suspicious" behavior—it's a protected right. In this interaction at the Omaha Treasurer's Office, the officers attempt to use "public concern" as a reason to demand identification. However, the law is clear: without reasonable articulable suspicion of a specific crime, a citizen is under no obligation to identify. Is filming the government a crime, or is the government just uncomfortable being filmed?

Two Omaha officers get schooled on our rights. "Suspicion" isn't a crime, and filming in a public lobby isn't "suspicious" behavior—it's a protected right. In this interaction at the Omaha Treasurer's Office, the officers attempt to use "public concern" as a reason to demand identification. However, the law is clear: without reasonable articulable suspicion of a specific crime, a citizen is under no obligation to identify. Is filming the government a crime, or is the government just uncomfortable being filmed?

Chuckling Charlie

29,249 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

These aren't dirty pigs. These are the policies, procedures and protocols. The police have put in place around us. And when it was only affecting the black community, it didn't matter. Now it's affecting everybody. They have to fill those Corse, Civic and Geo group for profit prisons. Don't worry, though, this could never happen to you, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

These aren't dirty pigs. These are the policies, procedures and protocols. The police have put in place around us. And when it was only affecting the black community, it didn't matter. Now it's affecting everybody. They have to fill those Corse, Civic and Geo group for profit prisons. Don't worry, though, this could never happen to you, it's just a few bad apples. #backtheblue

DeletelawZ

16,433 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Sergeant arrested man for recording national guard armory. This incident occurred near the Hibbing National Guard Armory. The "story" behind this case is centered on a legal dispute over first amendment rights, refusing to ID, and the definition of Obstruction. Sgt. Everett detained the camera man for filming the armory, citing "suspicious activity." When he refused to provide identification—arguing that filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime—the situation escalated into a physical arrest. The man was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process. However, a Minnesota court eventually dismissed the charges. The court found that Everett did not have "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a crime was being committed. Merely filming a government building from a public space was deemed a protected First Amendment activity, and refusing to ID during an unlawful detention does not constitute obstruction in Minnesota. Upon release the camera man sued the Hibbing police department and won costing the citizens of that city 36,000 in their tax dollars. The sad part is the Hibbing PD has done nothing from a disciplinary standpoint to Sergeant Everett.

Sergeant arrested man for recording national guard armory. This incident occurred near the Hibbing National Guard Armory. The "story" behind this case is centered on a legal dispute over first amendment rights, refusing to ID, and the definition of Obstruction. Sgt. Everett detained the camera man for filming the armory, citing "suspicious activity." When he refused to provide identification—arguing that filming from a public sidewalk is not a crime—the situation escalated into a physical arrest. The man was charged with Obstruction of Legal Process. However, a Minnesota court eventually dismissed the charges. The court found that Everett did not have "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a crime was being committed. Merely filming a government building from a public space was deemed a protected First Amendment activity, and refusing to ID during an unlawful detention does not constitute obstruction in Minnesota. Upon release the camera man sued the Hibbing police department and won costing the citizens of that city 36,000 in their tax dollars. The sad part is the Hibbing PD has done nothing from a disciplinary standpoint to Sergeant Everett.

Giggling Ganon

16,588 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

WHAT?? You refuse to sit in your car? How dare you! You're going in chains, and you're going to the dungeon! Turn around and put your hands behind your back, you won't get in your car! Just get on your knees and comply. If you don't… Well, it's likely not gonna happen to you. Because it's just a few bad apples. #BACKTHEBLUE

WHAT?? You refuse to sit in your car? How dare you! You're going in chains, and you're going to the dungeon! Turn around and put your hands behind your back, you won't get in your car! Just get on your knees and comply. If you don't… Well, it's likely not gonna happen to you. Because it's just a few bad apples. #BACKTHEBLUE

DeletelawZ

13,455 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

If there were such a thing as "good cops" and "bad cops", if there were really just "a few bad apples" the good cops would keep the bad cops in check. It would be a self-correcting problem. The reality is there are just cops and they look after each other no matter how rotten.

If there were such a thing as "good cops" and "bad cops", if there were really just "a few bad apples" the good cops would keep the bad cops in check. It would be a self-correcting problem. The reality is there are just cops and they look after each other no matter how rotten.

🥀_ Imposter_🥀

74,779 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

He got called out because Jeremy was drunk. His sister called for a welfare check. Oh boy, what could possibly go wrong? The cop demanded his UH-thor-Uh-TIE be respect, "you're either going to jail or you're going to the morgue". Then he throws Jeremy on the ground twice by his hair. Jeremy fights back because he's being abused. Cop murdered him in his front yard. Don't worry, though, it could never be you, you'd never get drunk. It's just a few bad apples... #BackTheBlue till it happens to you.

He got called out because Jeremy was drunk. His sister called for a welfare check. Oh boy, what could possibly go wrong? The cop demanded his UH-thor-Uh-TIE be respect, "you're either going to jail or you're going to the morgue". Then he throws Jeremy on the ground twice by his hair. Jeremy fights back because he's being abused. Cop murdered him in his front yard. Don't worry, though, it could never be you, you'd never get drunk. It's just a few bad apples... #BackTheBlue till it happens to you.

DeletelawZ

15,476 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”

BREAKING: Jack Smith just eviscerated the Republican talking point that Trump was protected by the First Amendment when he attempted to defraud the American people. “The First Amendment does not protect speech that facilitates a crime. Speech that is used to facilitate a crime — a fraud crime in particular — is not protected under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court precedent on that is clear.”

Ed Krassenstein

307,492 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten