Cornell Jane Doe told police everything was consensual. She texted the guy afterward asking to hook up again. Two years later, civil lawsuit, gang r*pe allegations, men publicly named and fired. Her own statement said she was a five out of ten drunk, agreed to a threesome, and stopped... it herself when she wanted to. Regret is not r*pe. And believing women has to include believing what they said at the time.show more

Learn more and get your special discount and free shipping today at

Imagine a guy had a drug fueled orgy with six girls and later regretted it. Would anyone care or feel bad for him?

@grok, did jane doe also text her alleged rapist days later when sober that she loved him and called him king?

Lauren, why would she do that? Seriously, you're smart. Think about it. Why would anyone go to the cops to report consensual sex? If it was revenge for not being invited to a party she's better off lying about the whole thing. If she didn't feel it was rape at the time, why report anything at all? You don't go to the cops to report consensual sex. I'm sorry but you just don't. Conservatives should be questioning the liberal university and the new york district attorney.

@StephenGrantha8 We’ve seen this play book run before by liberal women… in the end it was the men winning defamation suits!

This is a very uneducated take. I suggest you familiarize yourself with what trauma responses look like.

You know...Celibacy is looking better and better. Between her and Clancy what are they good for?

She reported consensual sex? Were you born stupid ?

So Jane Doe agreed to have sex with two men and another five believed that they could join in. Rape is sex without consent Lauren. It doesn't matter whether a women chose to have sex with a hundred men if number 101 didn’t have consent it was rape.

, whose husband was a career AUSA before Obama promoted him to U.S. Attorney, knows exactly what she’s doing by appointing @TishJames to become the next Mike Nifong (the Durham County DA who railroaded the Duke Lacrosse players). Kathy & Tish have already deprived the defendant(s) of their right to a “disinterested prosecutor.” That’s not by accident. That’s by design. In fact, it’s the m.o. for Dem lawfare perps who cosplay as apolitical prosecutors. I know whereof I speak. To Jack Smith’s partial credit, in the autumn of 2023 he “declined” to seek bogus political fundraising indictments against Trump and his campaign associates (including me!). To take me (Trump’s top digital fundraiser) off the political playing field, the Biden DOJ needed a prosecutor who was even more improperly motivated and unethical than Smith. To execute the character assassination and wrongful imprisonment of the former Counsel to Senate Judiciary Cmte Republicans in the Bush-Obama era (yours truly), DOJ cherry-picked Ben Taibleson (D-Milwaukee). Among several thousand TDS-deranged prosecutors in DOJ’s career ranks, none is more blatantly anti-Trump/MAGA/GOP/conservative than aspiring Democrat politician Ben Taibleson (I think it was my daughter Reagan who coined a derisive nickname for DOJ’s bent copper: “Bent Taiblespoon”). After (1) getting his degree in political science and penning progressive political commentary, my Democrat-activist-turned-lawfare-perp … (2) clerked for Judge Merrick Garland (whose promotion to SCOTUS was prevented by my former employer & current fundraising clients), (3) was radicalized in the Trump era to become a serial Democrat donor who made substantial contributions to the campaigns of (a) Kamala Harris for Senate, (b) Joe Biden for @POTUS, and (c) Josh Kaul for AG (the state AG prosecuting a Trump lawyer & campaign aide on bogus fraud charges), (4) was “Special Counsel” to FBI Director Christopher Wray after the 2020 election, (5) lobbied the Biden White House for a coveted political appointment from Biden, (6) earned the political patronage recommendation of Democrat U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin (whose 2018 reelection I opposed with a six figure donation). Sadly, this Dem lawfare perp is still on DOJ’s payroll as though Joe Biden or Kamala Harris (the biggest beneficiaries of Taibleson’s political speech and his abuse of power) had defeated Donald Trump (my biggest client since 2016).

One thing I find missing from a lot of her supporters is why they never mention the sorority supporting her at all? If I remember correctly in the civil suit she does accuse the sorority in it does she not? Her support just keeps mentioning the 57 men in a group chat

Imagine if she would have lied to the police two weeks later. These guys lives would be over, the truth would be irrelevant to the left, a majority of “right” wing females and far too many “right” wing males

Clusterfuck. The apt and perfect name for this situation. Everyone was wasted everyone was making wasted person decisions. End of story. You can't complain about an elbow if you jump in the mosh pit.

Two years ago it wasn't just before the mid-term elections. In '22 it was R v Wade.

Ok. So you do believe Donald Trump is a rapist, then right? Do you believe women or no?

Enjoying your coverage on this. It’s an important conversation

None of this would ever happen if parents would raise their children right. I would never join in a gang bang. You have to be gay to be naked with other men with boners. And if there’s drugs involved, it’s rape, doing drugs may have been consensual but once you’re impaired so is your judgement.

Why is it too far fetched to consider denial as a part of trauma processing. Why is it a stretch to consider she realized the situation for what it was once she realized their intent. This is not a first time situation for this group of men. Their intent was to cause harm.

interesting timing of civil lawsuit and then appointing Leticia James ... so obvious

We can say Lucy Craig now

Her name is out there just stop.