Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

COVID-19 endless booster program is an enigma. HHS CDC U.S. FDA cannot answer any of these questions. -How many doses produced? -Cost? -Number of takers? -Outcomes? -Cumulative adverse events? Courtesy Grant Stinchfield Grant Stinchfield McCullough Foundation

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

1,255,842 subscribers

13,582 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Pfizer-BioNTech Booster Trial Terminated--Will 2026 See Another Failed mRNA Booster Campaign? As of today (April 17, 2026), neither the FDA nor the CDC has announced boosters specifically labeled for a “2026–2027” season yet. CDC has not reported actual booster uptake for years, could 2026 be the end of the disastrous shots? Last years ill-fated booster decision occurred on May 22, 2025. Dr McCullough with Grant Stinchfield on Stinchfield the Podcast Grant Stinchfield The Wellness Company McCullough Foundation

Pfizer-BioNTech Booster Trial Terminated--Will 2026 See Another Failed mRNA Booster Campaign? As of today (April 17, 2026), neither the FDA nor the CDC has announced boosters specifically labeled for a “2026–2027” season yet. CDC has not reported actual booster uptake for years, could 2026 be the end of the disastrous shots? Last years ill-fated booster decision occurred on May 22, 2025. Dr McCullough with Grant Stinchfield on Stinchfield the Podcast Grant Stinchfield The Wellness Company McCullough Foundation

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

15,992 views • 3 months ago

Implications from CDC Stance on Vaccines and Autism, "Safer to Wait" US CDC following the McCullough Foundation Report released October 27, 2025 has dramatically changed its stance on the role of combination childhood vaccination in susceptible children and the development of autism. The converse--healthy children at birth remain healthier if completely unvaccinated (see Table 4) is consistent with World Council for Health "Safer to Wait" guidance. Courtesy Stinchfield Tonight, Real America's Voice Grant Stinchfield Real America's Voice (RAV) McCullough Foundation CDC World Council for Health (WCH) Dr Tess Lawrie

Implications from CDC Stance on Vaccines and Autism, "Safer to Wait" US CDC following the McCullough Foundation Report released October 27, 2025 has dramatically changed its stance on the role of combination childhood vaccination in susceptible children and the development of autism. The converse--healthy children at birth remain healthier if completely unvaccinated (see Table 4) is consistent with World Council for Health "Safer to Wait" guidance. Courtesy Stinchfield Tonight, Real America's Voice Grant Stinchfield Real America's Voice (RAV) McCullough Foundation CDC World Council for Health (WCH) Dr Tess Lawrie

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

51,922 views • 7 months ago

ADHD, Autism, Tics, and Epilepsy--Sequelae of Encephalitis or Brain Inflammation after Vaccination Twenty vaccines list encephalitis or brain inflammation in their package inserts as single products. With greater probably, when many vaccines are given in combination, there is a real risk of encephalitis in the baby that results days, weeks, or months later in the development of ADHD, autism, tics, and epilepsy. These are the consequences of excessive vaccination that has occurred since 1986 when vaccine liability protection was given to vaccine manufacturers by law. Dr Peter McCullough,™ who sees patients with these problems in clinical practice, explains to Grant Stinchfield on Stinchfield Tonight, Real America's Voice. Grant Stinchfield Real America's Voice (RAV) McCullough Foundation

ADHD, Autism, Tics, and Epilepsy--Sequelae of Encephalitis or Brain Inflammation after Vaccination Twenty vaccines list encephalitis or brain inflammation in their package inserts as single products. With greater probably, when many vaccines are given in combination, there is a real risk of encephalitis in the baby that results days, weeks, or months later in the development of ADHD, autism, tics, and epilepsy. These are the consequences of excessive vaccination that has occurred since 1986 when vaccine liability protection was given to vaccine manufacturers by law. Dr Peter McCullough,™ who sees patients with these problems in clinical practice, explains to Grant Stinchfield on Stinchfield Tonight, Real America's Voice. Grant Stinchfield Real America's Voice (RAV) McCullough Foundation

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

70,590 views • 7 months ago

COVID-19 Deaths Grossly Exaggerated by CDC Definition SARS-CoV-2 PCR test positive at any time prior to death worked to create massively inflated death count. Real number of Americans who died from COVID-19 is probably ~120,000. Sadly, far more died from COVID-19 vaccination, ~550,000. Courtesy Battle for Science, Apeldoorn NE, Lighthouse TV. LightHouseTV McCullough Foundation

COVID-19 Deaths Grossly Exaggerated by CDC Definition SARS-CoV-2 PCR test positive at any time prior to death worked to create massively inflated death count. Real number of Americans who died from COVID-19 is probably ~120,000. Sadly, far more died from COVID-19 vaccination, ~550,000. Courtesy Battle for Science, Apeldoorn NE, Lighthouse TV. LightHouseTV McCullough Foundation

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

103,033 views • 5 months ago

SHARIA LAW DOES NOT BELONG IN TEXAS “What you do is you ban any state recognition of Sharia as a legal source. That's number one, but you've got to have the teeth… For guys like me, that looks like rules of engagement. Now, this is not a kinetic war, but what this is is a war for the mind, assimilating the culture…the U.S. culture.” Doc Pete Chambers, running for governor of Texas, shares how he will fight Sharia Law in Texas. Grant Stinchfield

SHARIA LAW DOES NOT BELONG IN TEXAS “What you do is you ban any state recognition of Sharia as a legal source. That's number one, but you've got to have the teeth… For guys like me, that looks like rules of engagement. Now, this is not a kinetic war, but what this is is a war for the mind, assimilating the culture…the U.S. culture.” Doc Pete Chambers, running for governor of Texas, shares how he will fight Sharia Law in Texas. Grant Stinchfield

Real America's Voice (RAV)

17,356 views • 5 months ago

An estimated 31 million Americans took last fall's COVID booster. Dr. Peter McCullough told me he would not be surprised if the majority of them were children — the exact group least at risk from the virus, and the group most associated with adverse reactions. The CDC quietly stopped reporting how many people actually take a booster in 2023. So Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® & McCullough Foundation did the math themselves: they took Moderna and Pfizer's own sales and revenue numbers, applied a standard wastage calculation, and landed on 8.9% of the country. With 29 states still requiring the full ACIP schedule for school, he thinks most of those shots went into the arms of kids. Then there's the Czech Republic. Dr. McCullough says it's the only country that has actually separated the vaccinated from the unvaccinated on all-cause mortality. His read: the numbers do not look good.

An estimated 31 million Americans took last fall's COVID booster. Dr. Peter McCullough told me he would not be surprised if the majority of them were children — the exact group least at risk from the virus, and the group most associated with adverse reactions. The CDC quietly stopped reporting how many people actually take a booster in 2023. So Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® & McCullough Foundation did the math themselves: they took Moderna and Pfizer's own sales and revenue numbers, applied a standard wastage calculation, and landed on 8.9% of the country. With 29 states still requiring the full ACIP schedule for school, he thinks most of those shots went into the arms of kids. Then there's the Czech Republic. Dr. McCullough says it's the only country that has actually separated the vaccinated from the unvaccinated on all-cause mortality. His read: the numbers do not look good.

Dr. Drew

87,931 views • 8 days ago

🚨 Dr. Karl Jablonowski just declared: The cover-up of Covid shot injuries is “the betrayal of our time—so vast that we cannot even count its casualties.” “The FDA was completely blind to adverse events.” “The CDC wasn't even looking.” “The CDC chose to ignore its own standard.” “VAERS had been grossly under-reported for the first 30 years, maxing out at 58,000 reports.” “In its 31st year alone, VAERS logged 18 times that number.” “Because of this disproportionality, the FDA's disproportionality analysis was washed out.” “Since both vaccines were the same platform and same adverse events, the comparison was muted.” “There was a savior in the ranks of the FDA who correctly identified the problem [and] communicated the fix to everyone who would listen.” “The problem is, no one listened.” “Luck was not on our side.” “The CDC failed to look.” “The FDA failed to fix a broken system that the CDC touted as the gold standard.” “The HHS failed to protect us.” “Especially after our freedom of choice was assaulted.” “FOIA evasion was well practiced and discovered, obviously not through a FOIA.” “Simply put, during the largest pharmaceutical rollout in human history, pharmacovigilance did not exist.” Senator Ron Johnson

🚨 Dr. Karl Jablonowski just declared: The cover-up of Covid shot injuries is “the betrayal of our time—so vast that we cannot even count its casualties.” “The FDA was completely blind to adverse events.” “The CDC wasn't even looking.” “The CDC chose to ignore its own standard.” “VAERS had been grossly under-reported for the first 30 years, maxing out at 58,000 reports.” “In its 31st year alone, VAERS logged 18 times that number.” “Because of this disproportionality, the FDA's disproportionality analysis was washed out.” “Since both vaccines were the same platform and same adverse events, the comparison was muted.” “There was a savior in the ranks of the FDA who correctly identified the problem [and] communicated the fix to everyone who would listen.” “The problem is, no one listened.” “Luck was not on our side.” “The CDC failed to look.” “The FDA failed to fix a broken system that the CDC touted as the gold standard.” “The HHS failed to protect us.” “Especially after our freedom of choice was assaulted.” “FOIA evasion was well practiced and discovered, obviously not through a FOIA.” “Simply put, during the largest pharmaceutical rollout in human history, pharmacovigilance did not exist.” Senator Ron Johnson

Children’s Health Defense

26,924 views • 2 months ago

Entire World Knows COVID-19 Vaccination is Not Safe Yet, no country will pull all the shots off the market to ensure consumer product safety. No formal inspections of the the vials for quality, purity, concentration, or contaminants. In US, CDC will not release the COVID-19 vaccination administration data for public use, merging with all-cause, CV, and cancer mortality data. Why? Courtesy Josh Trent and Wellness+Freedom Podcast Wellness + Wisdom Podcast The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Chief Nerd Shannon Joy Sara Gonzales Joe Pags Pagliarulo Sir Wayne Allyn Root - TV & Radio Host Lara Trump Vigilant Real America's Voice (RAV) Steve Gruber Ed Henry The Absolute Truth with @EmeraldRobinson John Fredericks Jo Bond❤️ DoctorRay @AlisonOAN @red_pill_health The Iron Wire Grant Stinchfield Jonathan Otto John Solomon

Entire World Knows COVID-19 Vaccination is Not Safe Yet, no country will pull all the shots off the market to ensure consumer product safety. No formal inspections of the the vials for quality, purity, concentration, or contaminants. In US, CDC will not release the COVID-19 vaccination administration data for public use, merging with all-cause, CV, and cancer mortality data. Why? Courtesy Josh Trent and Wellness+Freedom Podcast Wellness + Wisdom Podcast The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Chief Nerd Shannon Joy Sara Gonzales Joe Pags Pagliarulo Sir Wayne Allyn Root - TV & Radio Host Lara Trump Vigilant Real America's Voice (RAV) Steve Gruber Ed Henry The Absolute Truth with @EmeraldRobinson John Fredericks Jo Bond❤️ DoctorRay @AlisonOAN @red_pill_health The Iron Wire Grant Stinchfield Jonathan Otto John Solomon

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

269,179 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Peter McCullough before the Idaho State Senate: “There’s a global recognition that the COVID-19 vaccines were a MISTAKE.” McCullough’s statement came in support of Senate Bill 1036 (S1036), which seeks to establish a moratorium on the use of mRNA-based vaccines. The bill, named after Doug Cameron, an Idaho rancher who reportedly experienced severe side effects from an mRNA vaccine, is currently under review by the Senate Health and Welfare Committee. If passed, the legislation could set a precedent for more states to start banning mRNA jabs. Dr. McCullough warned, “Last year, our CDC recorded 823 more deaths due to the vaccines. People took them, and they didn’t know. So it’s of public health importance for this group to understand that safety comes first.” He added, “What we’ve learned is that the messenger RNA gene technology transfer platform used for Moderna and Pfizer unfortunately is not safe, and it’s been linked to many, many problems after COVID-19 vaccination.” “They [mRNA jabs] should be halted from clinical use, and then anybody who takes any one of these messenger RNA products or any animal that is going to take one of these products should be done in a research protocol. They’re not ready for public use,” Dr. McCullough concluded. Follow Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® and McCullough Foundation for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections.

Dr. Peter McCullough before the Idaho State Senate: “There’s a global recognition that the COVID-19 vaccines were a MISTAKE.” McCullough’s statement came in support of Senate Bill 1036 (S1036), which seeks to establish a moratorium on the use of mRNA-based vaccines. The bill, named after Doug Cameron, an Idaho rancher who reportedly experienced severe side effects from an mRNA vaccine, is currently under review by the Senate Health and Welfare Committee. If passed, the legislation could set a precedent for more states to start banning mRNA jabs. Dr. McCullough warned, “Last year, our CDC recorded 823 more deaths due to the vaccines. People took them, and they didn’t know. So it’s of public health importance for this group to understand that safety comes first.” He added, “What we’ve learned is that the messenger RNA gene technology transfer platform used for Moderna and Pfizer unfortunately is not safe, and it’s been linked to many, many problems after COVID-19 vaccination.” “They [mRNA jabs] should be halted from clinical use, and then anybody who takes any one of these messenger RNA products or any animal that is going to take one of these products should be done in a research protocol. They’re not ready for public use,” Dr. McCullough concluded. Follow Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® and McCullough Foundation for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

118,567 views • 1 year ago

WOW! Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts completely Destroys the Covid-19 Propaganda Machine... Regarding the mice injected with vaccine that died... "How many of these studies showing fatal outcomes from covid products are needed before the government accepts the 30,000 excessive deaths are in part caused by these injections." "1 in 35 recipients of a Moderna Covid booster experienced Myocarditis" "Average age of the subjects was under 37 years. This is an age where a heart attack is far from their mind. It's an age where someone would get the injection and go about their life, including exercising. And in so doing risk serious heart complications or even being another DIED SUDDENLY STATISTIC. Safe and effective was two lies."

WOW! Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts completely Destroys the Covid-19 Propaganda Machine... Regarding the mice injected with vaccine that died... "How many of these studies showing fatal outcomes from covid products are needed before the government accepts the 30,000 excessive deaths are in part caused by these injections." "1 in 35 recipients of a Moderna Covid booster experienced Myocarditis" "Average age of the subjects was under 37 years. This is an age where a heart attack is far from their mind. It's an age where someone would get the injection and go about their life, including exercising. And in so doing risk serious heart complications or even being another DIED SUDDENLY STATISTIC. Safe and effective was two lies."

Died Suddenly

1,027,475 views • 2 years ago

Australian Medical Icon Breaks Down in Tears Over COVID Vaccine Catastrophe Professor Ian Brighthope delivered an emotional critique of the COVID-19 vaccination program, describing it as “the most uncontrolled experimentation ever on humankind.” Dr. Brighthope exposed a disturbing pattern he and his colleagues have observed: an alarming surge in “turbo cancers” linked to COVID-19 booster shots. “Patients who have been cancer-free for many years are suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumor growth following the booster administration,” he stated. “These turbo cancers are emerging faster and with greater virulence than we would expect in patients, even those who had been stable for years,” he continued. “The public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge the correlation. This is happening across the globe where the mRNA vaccines have been administered.” With over 60 million doses of these vaccines administered to more than 20 million Australians, Dr. Brighthope issued a grave warning: “There is a potential long-term health crisis waiting to happen.” He called on the government to act urgently, saying, “This matter must be taken seriously by every Australian.” This video is a must-watch.

Australian Medical Icon Breaks Down in Tears Over COVID Vaccine Catastrophe Professor Ian Brighthope delivered an emotional critique of the COVID-19 vaccination program, describing it as “the most uncontrolled experimentation ever on humankind.” Dr. Brighthope exposed a disturbing pattern he and his colleagues have observed: an alarming surge in “turbo cancers” linked to COVID-19 booster shots. “Patients who have been cancer-free for many years are suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. These cases show very rapid tumor growth following the booster administration,” he stated. “These turbo cancers are emerging faster and with greater virulence than we would expect in patients, even those who had been stable for years,” he continued. “The public health authorities are reluctant to acknowledge the correlation. This is happening across the globe where the mRNA vaccines have been administered.” With over 60 million doses of these vaccines administered to more than 20 million Australians, Dr. Brighthope issued a grave warning: “There is a potential long-term health crisis waiting to happen.” He called on the government to act urgently, saying, “This matter must be taken seriously by every Australian.” This video is a must-watch.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

171,163 views • 1 year ago

From Brain Fog to Violence: Groundbreaking Study Attributes Unprecedented Neuropsychiatric Damage to COVID-19 mRNA Injections A new and alarming preprint study, co-authored by several prominent physicians including Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Peter McCullough, and Dr. Drew Pinsky, has delivered findings that demand immediate attention. The research, which analyzed data sourced directly from CDC and FDA databases, investigates the association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations and severe neuropsychiatric conditions. The results, described as shocking, indicate an unprecedented increase in risks. The study reports a 118-fold increase in cognitive adverse events, including conditions like Alzheimer's, dementia, strokes, and mental fatigue. It also found a 115-time increase in general psychiatric conditions and an 80-fold increase in suicidal and homicidal outcomes. As noted by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, these data points provide a clinical explanation for the behavioral changes many have observed in individuals who have received multiple COVID-19 shots—including increased anger, cognitive decline, and personality shifts. The study posits these are not coincidental but are potential complications of the injections. This research stands as a critical piece of evidence in the ongoing debate, underscoring what the authors describe as an urgent need to reevaluate the global deployment of these mRNA products. The call for a halt is growing louder, backed by what this study claims is undeniable data from official government sources.

From Brain Fog to Violence: Groundbreaking Study Attributes Unprecedented Neuropsychiatric Damage to COVID-19 mRNA Injections A new and alarming preprint study, co-authored by several prominent physicians including Dr. James Thorpe, Dr. Peter McCullough, and Dr. Drew Pinsky, has delivered findings that demand immediate attention. The research, which analyzed data sourced directly from CDC and FDA databases, investigates the association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations and severe neuropsychiatric conditions. The results, described as shocking, indicate an unprecedented increase in risks. The study reports a 118-fold increase in cognitive adverse events, including conditions like Alzheimer's, dementia, strokes, and mental fatigue. It also found a 115-time increase in general psychiatric conditions and an 80-fold increase in suicidal and homicidal outcomes. As noted by Dr. Sherry Tenpenny, these data points provide a clinical explanation for the behavioral changes many have observed in individuals who have received multiple COVID-19 shots—including increased anger, cognitive decline, and personality shifts. The study posits these are not coincidental but are potential complications of the injections. This research stands as a critical piece of evidence in the ongoing debate, underscoring what the authors describe as an urgent need to reevaluate the global deployment of these mRNA products. The call for a halt is growing louder, backed by what this study claims is undeniable data from official government sources.

Camus

26,109 views • 9 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 New bombshell report alleges the Biden FDA hid a major COVID vaccine stroke signal for months while pushing seniors to get boosted... According to the investigation led by Sen. Ron Johnson, federal health officials detected a statistically significant safety signal in November 2022 linking the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster to ischemic stroke in adults 65 and older. The signal kept showing up week after week. Reports of strokes piled up in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. By February 2023, internal records showed 226 stroke cases reported. Yet the FDA and CDC continued to recommend the booster for the exact population the signal was warning about. Internal emails are absolutely damning. CDC officials acknowledged the "WH and HHS intense push to increase uptake of the booster" was driving the messaging. Edits to a draft public communication plan softened the language from "moderately elevated" to "slightly elevated." A January 2023 website notice told the public there was a signal but emphasized in bold, twice, that "no change is recommended in COVID-19 vaccination practice." Behind the scenes, contractors were running something called the "Stroke Project" to investigate the very risk officials were publicly downplaying. The investigations apparently continued through at least September 2025. Sen. Johnson's office ran the numbers. COVID injections produced 25.5 deaths per million doses reported. The flu vaccine: 0.46 per million. That's a 55-fold increase in reported deaths per dose. And FDA officials kept telling Americans, including patients with diagnosed injection injuries, that no safety signals existed. Whatever your view on the vaccine itself, the question this report forces is simpler. When federal officials had the data showing the elevated risk to seniors, why did they keep recommending the booster to seniors anyway? The American public deserves an honest answer. Source: Senator Ron Johnson

🚨🇺🇸 New bombshell report alleges the Biden FDA hid a major COVID vaccine stroke signal for months while pushing seniors to get boosted... According to the investigation led by Sen. Ron Johnson, federal health officials detected a statistically significant safety signal in November 2022 linking the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent booster to ischemic stroke in adults 65 and older. The signal kept showing up week after week. Reports of strokes piled up in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. By February 2023, internal records showed 226 stroke cases reported. Yet the FDA and CDC continued to recommend the booster for the exact population the signal was warning about. Internal emails are absolutely damning. CDC officials acknowledged the "WH and HHS intense push to increase uptake of the booster" was driving the messaging. Edits to a draft public communication plan softened the language from "moderately elevated" to "slightly elevated." A January 2023 website notice told the public there was a signal but emphasized in bold, twice, that "no change is recommended in COVID-19 vaccination practice." Behind the scenes, contractors were running something called the "Stroke Project" to investigate the very risk officials were publicly downplaying. The investigations apparently continued through at least September 2025. Sen. Johnson's office ran the numbers. COVID injections produced 25.5 deaths per million doses reported. The flu vaccine: 0.46 per million. That's a 55-fold increase in reported deaths per dose. And FDA officials kept telling Americans, including patients with diagnosed injection injuries, that no safety signals existed. Whatever your view on the vaccine itself, the question this report forces is simpler. When federal officials had the data showing the elevated risk to seniors, why did they keep recommending the booster to seniors anyway? The American public deserves an honest answer. Source: Senator Ron Johnson

Mario Nawfal

202,404 views • 2 months ago

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." Dr Peter McCullough, MD The Vaccine Did Not Save Millions Of Lives...The Shots Contain A Killer Protein That Cannot Be Turned Off...It Was Not Safe By Design. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. Moreover, a recent study found that repeated COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of abnormally high concentrations of IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies fail to neutralize Spike protein, which has been shown to circulate for at least 28 days, cause immune suppression & promote the development of autoimmune diseases including myocarditis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 👇DNA Fragments In Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines👇 Speaker: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." Dr Peter McCullough, MD The Vaccine Did Not Save Millions Of Lives...The Shots Contain A Killer Protein That Cannot Be Turned Off...It Was Not Safe By Design. The predominant COVID-19 vaccine platforms include messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax & Zifi Vax – mRNA & viral vector vaccines involve the bodily synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as the foundation of the immune response. Regardless of the vaccine platform used, circulating SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein is the detrimental agent through which COVID-19 vaccines cause biological harm. Here Is The 'How & Why' Of The Spike Protein Mechanism That Leads To Harm & Death: Spike protein initiates the breakdown & internalization of ACE2 receptors, which disrupts the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) & lead to increased inflammation, vasoconstriction & thrombosis. Further, Spike protein stimulates platelets & inflicts damage to the endothelium, which leads to arterial & venous thrombosis. Immune cells that have absorbed the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) subsequently reintroduce them into the bloodstream with a higher number of exosomes carrying microRNAs & Spike protein, resulting in drastic inflammation. Long term immune surveillance is compromised by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to IRF7, IRF9, p53 & BRCA suppression. There is a causal link between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination & myocarditis, neurodegenerative disease, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impeded DNA damage response and tumorigenesis. Moreover, a recent study found that repeated COVID-19 vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines leads to the production of abnormally high concentrations of IgG4 antibodies. These antibodies fail to neutralize Spike protein, which has been shown to circulate for at least 28 days, cause immune suppression & promote the development of autoimmune diseases including myocarditis. 👇Fatal COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis👇 👇Cardiac Arrest After COVID-19 Vaccination👇 👇DNA Fragments In Pfizer & Moderna Vaccines👇 Speaker: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation

Valerie Anne Smith

67,928 views • 1 year ago

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.

Camus

52,491 views • 9 months ago

Powerful testimony by dr. Jessica Rose... "Thanks. I'd like to thank senator Johnson for this incredible opportunity to speak today. It is in fact the third invitation extended to me, but only the first that I could attend due to draconian impositions on freedom of movement that we've all been subjected to over the past four years." "Thank you all for attending and caring, so much about each other and the injured. Today, I speak for the people injured by the COVID-19 injectable products through VAERS data." "Analysis of the VAERS pharmacovigilance database in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products has revealed strong emergent safety signals from myocarditis to death that are not being acknowledged by the owners of the data." "This goes against standard operating procedures and begs the question, why are the injured being hidden? Fact. The Bradford Hill criteria are used to assess causality in epidemiological data such as the VAERS pharmacovigilance system." "Fact. The proportional reporting ratio is used to assess whether or not a particular adverse event is more commonly reported in the context of a particular drug. If the PRR is greater than one, a causal effect is indicated. Fact. The PRR calculation for death from VAERS in the context of the COVID nineteen shots using current VAERS data is 3.6." "Fact. The underreported number of deaths successfully filed to VAERS by 01/20/2021 was six hundred and thirty four. Based on historical guidelines, this was a sufficient this was sufficient as a signal not only to prompt an investigation but to shut down the rollout of the COVID nineteen shots." "Fact, in 1999, a rotavirus vaccine designed to prevent rotavirus gastroenteritis was pulled from the market due to an intussusception signal emanating from VAERS, which comprised 584 cases. Question, if five hundred and eighty four cases of intussusception were enough to prompt product removal, then why weren't six hundred and thirty four cases of death not enough to prompt COVID nineteen product removal?" "Fact. The early death count was hidden. Fact. Currently, 1,615,998 reports of adverse events have been successfully filed to VAERS in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products with a staggering one million thirteen thousand four hundred and forty two reports filed in 2021 alone when considering both the foreign and domestic datasets." "The number of adverse events reported to the domestic VAERS data set for all vaccines combined has been on average thirty nine thousand in total per year and has been very slowly and steadily increasing in direct proportion to the increasing number of vaccine products on the market. See slide one." "In 2021, however, a fourteen hundred and seventeen percent increase in reporting occurred whereby ninety three percent of these reports were in the context of the COVID-19 products." "Fact. Age is not deterministic for adverse event reporting. Since administration of the COVID nineteen products to the zero to four age group commenced, the rate of adverse event reporting has been increasing faster than for any other age group." "Fact. The argument that this spike protein the spike in reporting spike protein this spike in reporting is due to increased shot administration is false. Slide two shows the comparison of the number of adverse events per million doses in the context of influenza vaccines and the COVID-19 injectable products in 2019 and 2021 respectively." "On the left are the total adverse events, on the right are the deaths. The COVID nineteen injectable products are associated with a twenty six and a 100 fold increase in total adverse events and deaths respectively when compared per million doses with influenza vaccines in the same time frame." "Fact. The Bradford Hill criterion reversibility is satisfied. When a drug is withdrawn, the side effects disappear. A strong correlation of r equals point eight and a high covariance exist between shot rollout data and myocarditis reports filed according to our world and data, new vaccination data, and various data respectively. As shot demand wanes, so do the myocarditis reports. See slide three a." "Fact, the Bradford Hill criterion specificity is satisfied. A very specific population at a specific site and disease is reported with no other likely explanation. Dose two is associated with a fourfold increase in reporting of myocarditis in 15 year old boys. This indicates specificity with regard to age and gender. See slide three b." "Fact. The Bradford Hill criterion dose response is satisfied. Greater exposure leads to greater incidence of the effect. Following dose two, an increase in signal occurs. See slide three b." "Fact, myocarditis is not transient or mild. A new paper published by Rose et al in the journal Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety shows that myocarditis is associated with hospitalization in seventy six percent of reports. There are seven more Bradford Hill criterion criteria that are satisfiable. That's a 10 out of 10. Bingo." "Conclusion. Standard operating procedures for analysis of safety signals emergent from VAERS when utilized reveal causal links between the COVID nineteen injectable products and the adverse events investigated." "Standard operating procedures are not being followed by the owners of the data, namely CDC, HHS, and FDA, and this equates to hiding the millions of people reporting not only adverse events but injuries in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products."

Powerful testimony by dr. Jessica Rose... "Thanks. I'd like to thank senator Johnson for this incredible opportunity to speak today. It is in fact the third invitation extended to me, but only the first that I could attend due to draconian impositions on freedom of movement that we've all been subjected to over the past four years." "Thank you all for attending and caring, so much about each other and the injured. Today, I speak for the people injured by the COVID-19 injectable products through VAERS data." "Analysis of the VAERS pharmacovigilance database in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products has revealed strong emergent safety signals from myocarditis to death that are not being acknowledged by the owners of the data." "This goes against standard operating procedures and begs the question, why are the injured being hidden? Fact. The Bradford Hill criteria are used to assess causality in epidemiological data such as the VAERS pharmacovigilance system." "Fact. The proportional reporting ratio is used to assess whether or not a particular adverse event is more commonly reported in the context of a particular drug. If the PRR is greater than one, a causal effect is indicated. Fact. The PRR calculation for death from VAERS in the context of the COVID nineteen shots using current VAERS data is 3.6." "Fact. The underreported number of deaths successfully filed to VAERS by 01/20/2021 was six hundred and thirty four. Based on historical guidelines, this was a sufficient this was sufficient as a signal not only to prompt an investigation but to shut down the rollout of the COVID nineteen shots." "Fact, in 1999, a rotavirus vaccine designed to prevent rotavirus gastroenteritis was pulled from the market due to an intussusception signal emanating from VAERS, which comprised 584 cases. Question, if five hundred and eighty four cases of intussusception were enough to prompt product removal, then why weren't six hundred and thirty four cases of death not enough to prompt COVID nineteen product removal?" "Fact. The early death count was hidden. Fact. Currently, 1,615,998 reports of adverse events have been successfully filed to VAERS in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products with a staggering one million thirteen thousand four hundred and forty two reports filed in 2021 alone when considering both the foreign and domestic datasets." "The number of adverse events reported to the domestic VAERS data set for all vaccines combined has been on average thirty nine thousand in total per year and has been very slowly and steadily increasing in direct proportion to the increasing number of vaccine products on the market. See slide one." "In 2021, however, a fourteen hundred and seventeen percent increase in reporting occurred whereby ninety three percent of these reports were in the context of the COVID-19 products." "Fact. Age is not deterministic for adverse event reporting. Since administration of the COVID nineteen products to the zero to four age group commenced, the rate of adverse event reporting has been increasing faster than for any other age group." "Fact. The argument that this spike protein the spike in reporting spike protein this spike in reporting is due to increased shot administration is false. Slide two shows the comparison of the number of adverse events per million doses in the context of influenza vaccines and the COVID-19 injectable products in 2019 and 2021 respectively." "On the left are the total adverse events, on the right are the deaths. The COVID nineteen injectable products are associated with a twenty six and a 100 fold increase in total adverse events and deaths respectively when compared per million doses with influenza vaccines in the same time frame." "Fact. The Bradford Hill criterion reversibility is satisfied. When a drug is withdrawn, the side effects disappear. A strong correlation of r equals point eight and a high covariance exist between shot rollout data and myocarditis reports filed according to our world and data, new vaccination data, and various data respectively. As shot demand wanes, so do the myocarditis reports. See slide three a." "Fact, the Bradford Hill criterion specificity is satisfied. A very specific population at a specific site and disease is reported with no other likely explanation. Dose two is associated with a fourfold increase in reporting of myocarditis in 15 year old boys. This indicates specificity with regard to age and gender. See slide three b." "Fact. The Bradford Hill criterion dose response is satisfied. Greater exposure leads to greater incidence of the effect. Following dose two, an increase in signal occurs. See slide three b." "Fact, myocarditis is not transient or mild. A new paper published by Rose et al in the journal Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety shows that myocarditis is associated with hospitalization in seventy six percent of reports. There are seven more Bradford Hill criterion criteria that are satisfiable. That's a 10 out of 10. Bingo." "Conclusion. Standard operating procedures for analysis of safety signals emergent from VAERS when utilized reveal causal links between the COVID nineteen injectable products and the adverse events investigated." "Standard operating procedures are not being followed by the owners of the data, namely CDC, HHS, and FDA, and this equates to hiding the millions of people reporting not only adverse events but injuries in the context of the COVID nineteen injectable products."

Camus

51,299 views • 1 year ago

Dr. Sara Brenner, a top FDA official since 2019 and now Principal Deputy Commissioner, made a stunning admission at a recent event: she refused the COVID-19 vaccine while pregnant, citing serious concerns about its biodistribution and potential excretion in breast milk. As a nanobiotechnology expert and former Acting FDA Commissioner (Jan 2025), she was in a position to know the risks—and she chose to protect her child. Brenner says her concerns were later validated by studies (2022 & 2023) showing mRNA from Pfizer/Moderna vaccines in breast milk. Yet, the FDA and CDC continued pushing these shots for pregnant women, despite her private doubts as a senior official. Why didn’t she speak out sooner to warn others? Thousands of pregnant women took the vaccine to keep jobs or follow mandates, unaware of risks she suspected. This raises critical questions: - Why did the FDA suppress uncertainties about vaccine safety for pregnant women? - How many other insiders shared Brenner’s doubts but stayed silent? - Why are routine COVID vaccinations still recommended for pregnant women when even the CDC is now backing off? Brenner calls the pandemic era a “dark time” and promises a “new dawn” of transparency under leaders like HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But trust in public health is shattered. Her silence then, and admission now, demand accountability.

Dr. Sara Brenner, a top FDA official since 2019 and now Principal Deputy Commissioner, made a stunning admission at a recent event: she refused the COVID-19 vaccine while pregnant, citing serious concerns about its biodistribution and potential excretion in breast milk. As a nanobiotechnology expert and former Acting FDA Commissioner (Jan 2025), she was in a position to know the risks—and she chose to protect her child. Brenner says her concerns were later validated by studies (2022 & 2023) showing mRNA from Pfizer/Moderna vaccines in breast milk. Yet, the FDA and CDC continued pushing these shots for pregnant women, despite her private doubts as a senior official. Why didn’t she speak out sooner to warn others? Thousands of pregnant women took the vaccine to keep jobs or follow mandates, unaware of risks she suspected. This raises critical questions: - Why did the FDA suppress uncertainties about vaccine safety for pregnant women? - How many other insiders shared Brenner’s doubts but stayed silent? - Why are routine COVID vaccinations still recommended for pregnant women when even the CDC is now backing off? Brenner calls the pandemic era a “dark time” and promises a “new dawn” of transparency under leaders like HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. But trust in public health is shattered. Her silence then, and admission now, demand accountability.

Camus

92,617 views • 1 year ago

🎇🇺🇸 CDC Set to Officially Recognize COVID-19 Vax Injury with Unprecedented ICD-10 Diagnostic Code ATLANTA, GA, March 18, 2026 – For the first time in US history, a dedicated ICD-10 diagnostic code specific for adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines is entering the formal process toward adoption by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. The announcement is a major victory for those suffering from COVID-19 vaccine injury around the country. React19 - Official , the science-based non-profit offering financial, physical, and emotional support for those suffering from long-term Covid-19 vaccine adverse events globally, proposed the idea for the dedicated code. The proposal will now enter a 60-day public comment period, with the potential to be included in the U.S. system as early as 2027. Currently, no ICD-10-CM code identifies these injuries, making it difficult to properly track, study, or treat them at scale. This new code begins to change that, creating a pathway for clinical recognition, accurate documentation, research, and ultimately better care. Submitted by Joel Wallskog, co-founder of React19, this adoption marks an important step toward clinical recognition, accurate documentation, and future research. T50.B25x – Adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines X= 3 designations: A initial encounter; D subsequent encounter; S sequela "You cannot treat what you cannot name. Today, we took a critical step toward naming these conditions—and changing the future for patients,” said Wallskog. While the adoption of the ICD-10-CM code and recognition of those suffering are steps in the right direction, advocates from React19 are urging the Trump administration to establish nationwide care centers where injured individuals can receive treatment and recover. REACT19 strongly encourages those who support patient recognition and care to participate once the official public comment period begins. Details on how to submit comments will be shared soon. For more information, please visit

🎇🇺🇸 CDC Set to Officially Recognize COVID-19 Vax Injury with Unprecedented ICD-10 Diagnostic Code ATLANTA, GA, March 18, 2026 – For the first time in US history, a dedicated ICD-10 diagnostic code specific for adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines is entering the formal process toward adoption by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. The announcement is a major victory for those suffering from COVID-19 vaccine injury around the country. React19 - Official , the science-based non-profit offering financial, physical, and emotional support for those suffering from long-term Covid-19 vaccine adverse events globally, proposed the idea for the dedicated code. The proposal will now enter a 60-day public comment period, with the potential to be included in the U.S. system as early as 2027. Currently, no ICD-10-CM code identifies these injuries, making it difficult to properly track, study, or treat them at scale. This new code begins to change that, creating a pathway for clinical recognition, accurate documentation, research, and ultimately better care. Submitted by Joel Wallskog, co-founder of React19, this adoption marks an important step toward clinical recognition, accurate documentation, and future research. T50.B25x – Adverse effect of COVID-19 vaccines X= 3 designations: A initial encounter; D subsequent encounter; S sequela "You cannot treat what you cannot name. Today, we took a critical step toward naming these conditions—and changing the future for patients,” said Wallskog. While the adoption of the ICD-10-CM code and recognition of those suffering are steps in the right direction, advocates from React19 are urging the Trump administration to establish nationwide care centers where injured individuals can receive treatment and recover. REACT19 strongly encourages those who support patient recognition and care to participate once the official public comment period begins. Details on how to submit comments will be shared soon. For more information, please visit

Trevor Fitzgibbon

155,722 views • 4 months ago

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." "Any Treatment That Worked Was Shut Down & Abolished." "The Only Thing We Heard Is...Be Afraid Of This, Stay In Lockdown, Wear A Mask & Wait For A Vaccine." There were countless treatments that worked. But, there was a strict & forceful government response to abolish any treatments. If the government acknowledged that robust treatments were available...then the emergency use authorization for the vaccines could not have been pushed thru rapidly. You cannot authorize an experimental emergency use vaccine if viable treatments are available for the illness. It started with Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Virucidal Nasal Sprays...all of them work. Corticosteroids, Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Quercetin, over the counter Famotidine. There's research & literature to support all of these treatments. Colchicine...the best quality prospective, multicenter, double blind randomized placebo controlled trial in the history of COVID-19 was done with Colchicine. It reduced the risk of hospitalization & death. It was suppressed & abolished & no one heard a word about it. The federal government has never mentioned the drug Colchicine. People were dying of blood clots...& there was never, ever any mention of taking simple aspirin or other blood thinners to prevent blood clots. Worldwide, all we heard was be afraid of this, stay in lockdown, social distance, wear a mask, use hand sanitizer...none of which work. Just wait for the vaccine to save you. And when you get the vaccine, you've got to take it, every 6 months with no questions, no exceptions & do not miss a shot. 👇Colchicine: Divine Medicine Against Covid-19👇 👇Hydroxychloroquine Effective Against Covid-19 👇 👇Ivermectin Reduces Covid-19 Risk👇 Speaker: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation

"It Was Clear From The Beginning, The Illness Of COVID Was Actually All About The Vaccine...A Needle Into Every Arm." "Any Treatment That Worked Was Shut Down & Abolished." "The Only Thing We Heard Is...Be Afraid Of This, Stay In Lockdown, Wear A Mask & Wait For A Vaccine." There were countless treatments that worked. But, there was a strict & forceful government response to abolish any treatments. If the government acknowledged that robust treatments were available...then the emergency use authorization for the vaccines could not have been pushed thru rapidly. You cannot authorize an experimental emergency use vaccine if viable treatments are available for the illness. It started with Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Virucidal Nasal Sprays...all of them work. Corticosteroids, Zinc, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Quercetin, over the counter Famotidine. There's research & literature to support all of these treatments. Colchicine...the best quality prospective, multicenter, double blind randomized placebo controlled trial in the history of COVID-19 was done with Colchicine. It reduced the risk of hospitalization & death. It was suppressed & abolished & no one heard a word about it. The federal government has never mentioned the drug Colchicine. People were dying of blood clots...& there was never, ever any mention of taking simple aspirin or other blood thinners to prevent blood clots. Worldwide, all we heard was be afraid of this, stay in lockdown, social distance, wear a mask, use hand sanitizer...none of which work. Just wait for the vaccine to save you. And when you get the vaccine, you've got to take it, every 6 months with no questions, no exceptions & do not miss a shot. 👇Colchicine: Divine Medicine Against Covid-19👇 👇Hydroxychloroquine Effective Against Covid-19 👇 👇Ivermectin Reduces Covid-19 Risk👇 Speaker: Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation

Valerie Anne Smith

60,221 views • 1 year ago