Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

COWS NECKS SLASHED OPEN FULLY CONSCIOUS AT BRITISH KOSHER SLAUGHTERHOUSE Background: Footage taken in February 2026 at Hartshead Meats Ltd, in Greater Manchester - a British slaughterhouse hosting non-stun Kosher Slaughter under the radar, the facility also conducts halal-stunned and standard slaughter. Our investigation uncovered a high frequency of...

27,574 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Esther McVey calls for clearer labelling of halal and kosher meats in the UK She argued that consumers concerned about animal welfare particularly where pre‑stunning isn’t used - (88% of halal meat in the UK is pre-stunned) Transcript: “I beg to move, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to introduce compulsory labelling of halal and kosher meat and products containing halal and kosher meat; and for connected purposes. This is a Bill about animal welfare, transparency in meat production and consumer choice. It does not seek to ban halal or kosher meat. It seeks to ensure that it is clearly labelled. It is important that consumers have such information so that they can make an informed choice about what they are buying. Currently consumers do not have that information, and many are purchasing and consuming halal and kosher meat without their knowledge and agreement. The unique process of halal and kosher meat requires the animal to have its throat slit. In the case of halal meat, the animal is often stunned before it is killed — although it might not be — and for the shechita killing for kosher meat, there is no pre‑stunning. This lack of stunning causes the animal to experience severe pain. An individual concerned about animal welfare would want to know if the animal has been stunned prior to slaughter. Likewise, there are many religious groups who want to know what they are consuming too and whether the meat has been blessed by another religion. In all those cases clear labelling is essential to make an informed choice. Currently, the legislation that regulates animal slaughter is set out in assimilated EU regulation 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, as well as in the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015. Under these laws, animals must be stunned before they are killed, but exemptions exist for killing without stunning in accordance with specific religious rites. Added to that, there are currently no requirements for such meat to be labelled. What was once an exemption to the accepted stunning process of animals has become a growing part of the UK’s meat market. The Government’s own figures show that of the 1.035 billion animals processed in English and Welsh slaughterhouses in 2024, an estimated 214.6 million were slaughtered to produce halal meat. The analysis shows that the proportion of meat supplied by non‑stun slaughter is about four times greater than the proportion of Muslims and Jews in the UK. Although Government guidance is clear that meat that results from non‑stun slaughter “must be intended for consumption by Jews or Muslims”, production is clearly going way beyond that, so much so that the UK now exports halal meat. Between 2018 and 2019, there was an almost 700 % increase in the volume of sheep meat exported to the United Arab Emirates, all of which is required to be halal. Clearly, without compulsory labelling of non‑stunned meat, slaughterhouses have gone down the route of producing more of it. In effect, a two‑tier system has been created, whereby some slaughterhouses comply with stunning laws and others do not, citing the religious exemption, though without ever intending to focus their sale on that market. Unfortunately, a driver of the market for non‑stunned meat is the fact that a step of the process is removed, meaning that production of non‑stunned meat is cheaper. Supermarkets and food outlets can purchase that cheaper meat without ever declaring it to the customer, which is not what was intended by the legislation. We have seen many examples of this over the last 15 years; Britain’s biggest retailers — such as Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Marks & Spencer and Asda — have sold halal or kosher meat without informing the consumer, as have Domino’s, Pizza Hut and KFC. Non‑stunned produce is being used by 17 local councils in schools, the majority of which are not Islamic faith schools, without parents or children having the first idea about it. It is also being served in hospitals and local councils. In December, Labour put forward its much‑vaunted animal welfare strategy, a document lauded for its aim of “preventing animals suffering unnecessarily”, which included the banning of boiling live lobsters, banning the use of carbon dioxide to stun pigs, and steps to ensure the more humane slaughter of farmed fish. I was surprised and alarmed to see no mention of the more humane slaughter of animals and the labelling of halal and kosher meat. There was a clear opportunity to call for the labelling of halal and kosher meat, but it was missed. Nowhere in Labour’s 12,500‑word animal welfare strategy was it mentioned. We often hear in the House that the UK holds the status of a world leader in animal welfare, but such a glaring gap shows that this country can no longer make such a claim. Food and You 2, which is a biannual official statistic survey commissioned by the Food Standards Agency, found that the most common spontaneously expressed food concern in 2024 was “food production method”. In August 2022, almost 99 % of respondents to the Government’s call for evidence on labelling for animal welfare said that method‑of‑slaughter labelling should be introduced. In research from the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, 92 % of halal consumers state that clear halal certification is important, so is it not time we updated our regulations and demanded that our meat was clearly and fully labelled, so that we know what we are buying and eating? Surely that is what consumer choice is all about, and I would wager that the overwhelming majority of animal lovers in the UK expect the House of Commons to support this Bill today. This Bill will give all consumers assurance that they know how their meat was produced. I urge all Members of the House to support this measure.”

Farrukh

10,729 views • 4 months ago

Left: Keir Starmer mentions the attack in Golders Green Right: Keir Starmer forgot to mention that before Suleiman attacked two British Jews in Golders Green, he attacked a British Muslim in Southwark Suleiman has a long history of serious violence and mental health problems. He had previously been admitted to psychiatric hospitals and was living in mental health supported accommodation under the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust at the time of the attacks In 2008, Suleiman stabbed Police Constable Neil Sampson multiple times (in the head, face, and leg), requiring around 30 stitches and five months off work. He also stabbed the officer’s police dog, Anya, in the chest as she tried to protect her handler Mental health issues can help explain violent behaviour, but they do not excuse it - whether the victims are British Jews or a British Muslim Thankfully, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has fully acknowledged the sequence of events by charging Essa Suleiman with three counts of attempted murder - including the earlier attack on a British Muslim in Southwark that same morning It is a genuine shame that Prime Minister Keir Starmer has ignored this first incident and focused solely on the attacks in Golders Green. By doing so, he gives the impression that the safety and security of British Muslims matter less than that of British Jews To be clear: Everyone in this country, regardless of faith or background, deserves to live in safety and without fear. Selective outrage undermines trust and fairness for all communities

Farrukh

29,309 views • 2 months ago

🚨RED STATE TAKEOVER: ISLAMIZED UTAH 🚨 Another deep-red state selected for Islamization! Utah - GOP trifecta, Trump landslide territory - just woke up to the fact that its own Republican Governor Spencer Cox personally ushered in July as official Muslim American Heritage Month every single year starting in 2024. That’s right! Cox signed the proclamation himself, turning an entire month in the reddest of red states into a state-sanctioned celebration of Islam. And local media couldn’t wait to run the fluff pieces: Fox 13 News gushed over the first-ever Halal Food Festival in Salt Lake City - the grand finale of “Muslim American Heritage Month” hosted by the Utah Muslim Civic League. Vendors pushing halal sweets and bread, a cricket match with a Pakistani pro player, and reporters celebrating how “hard it was to find halal food before” now that it’s being shoved into the mainstream. This isn’t harmless “heritage.” It’s the red-green alliance marking territory. Because halal isn’t just food - it’s Sharia in your shopping cart. Halal slaughter means animals have their throats slit while fully conscious, hung upside down, and bled out in terror and agony - all for Islamic superstition. It’s needless cruelty that violates every standard of animal welfare. Worse: Every halal certification is an Islamic tax. Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups rake in millions certifying everything from soup to sugar. That money funds the further expansion of Islam in the West - sharia finance, sharia courts, and more cultural conquest. Politicians and corporations connive to hide it. Schools and hospitals secretly feed kids and patients halal meat without consent. Non-Muslims’ objections? Ignored. Muslim feelings? Protected at all costs. Utah, your Republican governor, opened the floodgates. Your local media is cheerleading the invasion. Halal festivals in your parks. Prayer rooms in your City Hall. Iftar dinners in the Governor’s Mansion. There is ZERO reciprocity - no Islamic nation will ever declare a Christian Appreciation Month, import holy water, or let crosses and Easter prayers inside their government buildings. This is conquest by celebration. One red state at a time. Utah - wake the hell up. Boycott halal. Reject the tax. Demand your governor stop surrendering your state to Islam before it’s too late. Follow our work at RAIR Foundation USA -

Amy Mek

30,517 views • 3 months ago

Politically decided animal abuse in Denmark does not only involve the Bovaer poison. The Mols Laboratory is known as the place where animals have been abused for nine years by being starved every winter and not receiving veterinary treatment when they are injured. For three years, I and others have had to feed these animals in the winter, where the gallow cattle in particular are now visibly thin. See photos at the end of the video. And so it is me who feeds the animals, and for that I am being prosecuted and will be in court in the fall of 2026. However, I continue to feed the animals anyway, about every five days this winter. The police have acknowledged that the Mols Laboratory is violating the Animal Welfare Act, but then say that it is a political matter, thereby saying that the police are controlled by politicians not to enforce the Animal Welfare Act. And since the police do not prosecute the Mols Laboratory for animal abuse, the animal abuse will never come before a judge, and the Danish state press, the amoral politicians, and the bandits who have abused the animals at the Mols Laboratory for nine years, can then claim that they are not breaking the law. This winter, 52 animals are being abused at the Mols Laboratory. 35 Exmoor ponies, which are otherwise protected in England, and 17 Galloway cattle. Due to the UN's 17 totalitarian global goals, which are now being introduced in Denmark, 21 so-called Nature National Parks are being established in Denmark, where 300,000 animals will live under the same conditions. No winter feeding and no veterinary treatment. The ethnic cleansing of trees in Denmark's forests is for the same reason: That is, the UN's 17 totalitarian global goals. With regard to animal abuse and the destruction of Danish forests, global goal number 15 is at play, which is about taking control of nature. The entire UN's 17 global goals scam is about controlling and registering everything you can imagine and plays into the EU's Fit 50 agenda and the WEF's The Great Reset agenda. In short, it is the introduction of a totalitarian technocracy, where the world's richest bandits will own everything through so-called stakeholder capitalism. This means that ordinary, non-rich people will own nothing and will be treated like slaves, as serfs were in the Middle Ages, under the king and the king's nobility. At least, that is the plan to be introduced, behind the claim of a man-made climate crisis. And I urge everyone to rebel against this. Those who mistreat animals and those who condone animal abuse, do not value human life either. If you do not want your descendants to be slaves in the future, then oppose the climate fraud and the animal abuse. Also when it comes to the Bovaer poisen. Inform others about what is going on and actively oppose it. Please see this movie, share this post and rebel against UNs agenda 2030:

Kent Nielsen Denmark

11,337 views • 5 months ago

How 'Beef Parotta' Became A Part Of "Kerala's Culture?" Today, ‘beef curry’ and ‘parotta’ are proudly flaunted as Kerala's culture. It can be seen everywhere, from the speeches of political leaders to Malayalam cinema. But was it always like this? Definitely not, it was forced into Kerala's cuisine, and ultimately its "culture." To know how, read or watch the following. Like the rest of India, the Hindus of Kerala held profound reverence for the cow, and there is a great deal of historical evidence to prove this. Famous foreign travellers like Ibn Battuta and Abdur Razzaq clearly wrote in their travelogues that slaughtering a cow in Kerala was the greatest crime, punishable by the most gruesome death. However, reverence for the cow has now become an exception in Kerala. And it is not because cow worship was not a tradition in Kerala, but because a systematic de-Hinduisation and de-sacralisation of public life has been carried out here. If we look at British records of Kerala, the slaughter of cows by Moplahs in Malabar at that time was the biggest cause of frequent Hindu-Muxlim riots, as the British refused to intervene on behalf of the Hindus. During the Moplah Riots of the 1920s, there were countless incidents where Muxlims ofnormalisation Malabar slaughtered cows in temples and forcibly fed beef to Hindus to convert them. Because the rule of the Hindu Zamorin kings ended early in Malabar and a majority of the Hindu population was converted to Islam, cow slaughter and beef consumption became commonplace in this region. Conversely, in Travancore, cow slaughter was completely banned, and in Cochin, it was severely restricted. Thus, the roots of beef normalisation in Kerala lie in the Muxlim-majority Malabar. By the 1920s, due to British patronage and their dominance in the timber trade for shipbuilding, the Moplah Muxlims of Kerala began to become economically empowered. Since Malabar was a coastal region, these Muslims had been trading in Burma and Malaysia since the beginning, and with the Gulf Oil Boom of the 1960s, they not only earned wealth in Gulf countries but also strengthened their religious orthodoxy. Meanwhile, the exact opposite was happening to the Hindus. Kerala saw the formation of India's first non-Congress government, and it was a Communist one. The Communists launched sustained ideological attacks on the sacred religious beliefs of Hindus and began to desacralize or secularize all traditional institutions. Since Christians and Muslims had gained a demographic advantage due to forced conversions, they collaborated with the Communist state to undermine Hindu beliefs. For instance, the "land reforms" of the 1970s severely broke the stronghold of the traditional Hindu elite. Following historical patterns, they began to openly offend and humiliate Hindus in Malabar using cow slaughter and beef with full state support. A prime example of this is the portrayal of beef in Malayalam cinema. As long as the cinema was dominated by middle-class and upper-caste Hindus, beef was never shown, because it was simply not a part of their culture. However, as soon as Muxlim and X-tian producers, directors, and writers established a foothold after the year 2000, they turned the forced reality of ‘beef-parotta’ into a symbol of Kerala’s food culture. And as a result of this sustained propaganda around beef in 'popular culture' (cinema, theatre, media, etc.) by the Ixlamo-Marxist next, an average Malayali Hindu who consumes all this media started believing in the narrative of beef (cow meat) as part of Kerala's culture. This systematic and exaggerated propagandist portrayal on the reel started influencing reality to a significant extent. Although even today, the majority of Hindus in Kerala do not eat beef, it remains a largely political act. However, the normalisation of beef in Kerala is a clear-cut example of how Communist and Abrahamic ideologies can subvert any native culture in a very short span of time.

Prateek

574,243 views • 4 months ago