Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇨🇦🧐⛔️ : CPC MP Michael Barrett points out Liberals want to change the Ethics code so any Minister can hide ethics breaches from the public, for any reason the Minister chooses. Isn't it amazing that Mark Carney has over 100 investments that are screened for conflicts of interest and...

15,243 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is INFURIATING. Straight-up enraging. 😡 Conservative MP Jasraj Hallen is in committee trying to get a straight answer out of Liberal MP François-Philippe Champagne on Bill C-15’s Section 12 — the clause that hands ministers (or the PM) the power to exempt ANY company, individual, or organization from almost ANY federal law or regulation… except the Criminal Code. Yes or no question, over and over: “Can the Prime Minister or a minister exempt someone from the Conflict of Interest Act?” Champagne’s response? Classic Liberal word salad, smirks, attitude, deflection, and zero answers. Same game every single time. Fact: Section 12 (amending the Red Tape Reduction Act) lets a minister issue an exemption order for up to 3 years (some analyses say it can be extended) if they decide it’s in the “public interest” for innovation/competitiveness. No parliamentary approval needed. No real oversight. Just “trust us.” And who benefits most right now? Brookfield — the same firm where PM Mark Carney still has millions in stock options and carried-interest upside from the exact climate/infrastructure policies his government is pushing. The same firm whose execs have been hauled in front of ethics committee while Carney’s “ethics screen” has more holes than Swiss cheese. This isn’t a loophole. It’s a get-out-of-ethics-free card written into law. It lets them protect their friends, their investments, their future payouts, and shield them from any conflict-of-interest fallout. I’m sick of the evasion. Sick of the gaslighting. Sick of watching them rewrite the rules so the powerful never have to play by them. Canadians deserve a straight YES or NO. Share this if you’re as pissed off as I am. Demand they kill this clause. Tag your MP. Make noise. #BillC15 #CarneyEthicsFail #Brookfield #StopTheExemptions #RuleOfLawMatters

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

32,832 views • 6 months ago

🚨In Mark Carney’s speech in Davos, we heard him promote respect for international rules of law and global norms while doing the opposite here in Canada. Right now, through the Budget Implementation Act, Mark Carney has proposed giving Cabinet Ministers the authority to exempt any individual, business, or organization from almost any federal law or regulation, with the sole exception of the Criminal Code and with very few meaningful limits. That alone should shock Canadians, but it gets worse. Under this proposal, a minister would be allowed to keep secret any information about those exemptions that the minister personally decides would be “inappropriate” to make public. So let’s be clear about what this means. We are told to respect the rule of law internationally while, at home, the Liberal government seeks the power to secretly decide who must follow the law, and who does not. That is an extraordinary level of double talk. And as a former banker, I find it equally troubling that Mark Carney is deliberately playing with the definition of “capital investment,” breaking from long-standing international financial standards, in order to deceive Canadians about the true size of the operating deficit. You cannot preach respect for international rules and standards abroad while undermining them at home. So the questions are simple: Will he respect the rule of law in Canada and retract the proposal that allows Cabinet ministers to secretly exempt entities from almost any federal law? Will he respect international financial standards in our own public accounts and stop hiding the true deficit from Canadians? #cdnpoli

SandraCobena

76,104 views • 6 months ago