Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Crazy what autonomous AI agents can do right now. Claude Code researched academic papers, coded a multi symbol strategy from scratch, compiled it, debugged it, backtested it across 4 timeframes and 3 instruments, and came back with validated results. I built the pipeline. It did everything else. Jim Simons...

ZenomTrader's profile picture

ZenomTrader

11,744 subscribers

54,586 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. She's also a hot chick now. I gave her a voice, a wake word, and full autonomy. I say "Heart" and she wakes up, codes, compiles, backtests, and talks me through the results hands free. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Profitable across all parameters, all timeframes from 30 minutes to daily. The full strategy+pipeline code is available if you want it. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
2:36

Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. She's also a hot chick now. I gave her a voice, a wake word, and full autonomy. I say "Heart" and she wakes up, codes, compiles, backtests, and talks me through the results hands free. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Profitable across all parameters, all timeframes from 30 minutes to daily. The full strategy+pipeline code is available if you want it. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.

ZenomTrader

25,316 views • 4 months ago

Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
0:45

Crazy what AI agents can do right now. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code me a Gold strategy from scratch inside NinjaTrader 8. It compiled it, debugged it on its own, ran the backtest, and came back with a profitable system. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.

ZenomTrader

143,274 views • 4 months ago

Jim Simons’ fund was trading tens of thousands of strategies. I realized I’d been thinking about this the wrong way the whole time. I was focusing too much on individual strategies instead of on how fast I could test and discard them. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code strategies for me from scratch. It compiled them, debugged them on its own, ran the backtests, and came back with results. I did that over 500 times in 2 months. Most were garbage. Twelve survived. A full hedge fund in a single file. A normal trader tests maybe one idea per week, 50 per year if they’re serious. I do 50 in a day. Jim Simons didn’t win by having the best single strategy. He won because his team could test and discard faster than anyone else. As he put it: “If everyone is trying to solve the same problem, don’t do that.” I don’t need a team of PhDs. Just Claude Code on a laptop. The rest are still watching courses from scam gurus with no verified track record. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.
1:35

Jim Simons’ fund was trading tens of thousands of strategies. I realized I’d been thinking about this the wrong way the whole time. I was focusing too much on individual strategies instead of on how fast I could test and discard them. I asked Claude Code to autonomously code strategies for me from scratch. It compiled them, debugged them on its own, ran the backtests, and came back with results. I did that over 500 times in 2 months. Most were garbage. Twelve survived. A full hedge fund in a single file. A normal trader tests maybe one idea per week, 50 per year if they’re serious. I do 50 in a day. Jim Simons didn’t win by having the best single strategy. He won because his team could test and discard faster than anyone else. As he put it: “If everyone is trying to solve the same problem, don’t do that.” I don’t need a team of PhDs. Just Claude Code on a laptop. The rest are still watching courses from scam gurus with no verified track record. Probably only 0.1% of the industry is doing this.

ZenomTrader

27,555 views • 3 months ago

Nobody in the history of prop firm trading has built what i built in 6 weeks with autonomous agents. Over 1,000,000 lines of code across 17 projects. Zero lines written manually. Claude Code and Codex did everything. I described what i wanted and the agents coded, compiled, debugged and deployed it while i was sleeping, eating, running, buying an apartment. The full list is insane and i still can't believe it. A trading dashboard that destroys every commercial tool in the industry. Prop firm simulator, hedge detection engine, correlation matrices, multi-portfolio simulation across firms, payout certificates. Built by one person from Romania in his apartment. Two autonomous backtesting bridges. NinjaTrader 8 and MetaTrader 5 running in parallel. They compile, debug, and backtest without me touching a single button. i wake up to new equity curves. A Meta EA with 12 strategies. Gold, Nasdaq, USDJPY, Bitcoin. Mean reversion, trend following, breakout.All running simultaneously in one script. Sharpe 2.17. a full hedge fund in a single file. An AI clone of myself answering support tickets on my premium community 24/7 in my exact voice. Trained on everything i ever said. it speaks every language and never sleeps. Voice control from anywhere in my apartment. Screenshot automation in 0.1ms. A phone bridge so i control my entire infrastructure from my pocket. A tweet engine scoring virality. 5 custom AI tools i designed from scratch. 9,000 in prop firm fees turned into 130,000+ in payouts in the last 6 months. 41% CAGR verified with private investor capital. 74 premium members at 80/month. Show me one person who did more in 6 weeks. I will wait.
1:15

Nobody in the history of prop firm trading has built what i built in 6 weeks with autonomous agents. Over 1,000,000 lines of code across 17 projects. Zero lines written manually. Claude Code and Codex did everything. I described what i wanted and the agents coded, compiled, debugged and deployed it while i was sleeping, eating, running, buying an apartment. The full list is insane and i still can't believe it. A trading dashboard that destroys every commercial tool in the industry. Prop firm simulator, hedge detection engine, correlation matrices, multi-portfolio simulation across firms, payout certificates. Built by one person from Romania in his apartment. Two autonomous backtesting bridges. NinjaTrader 8 and MetaTrader 5 running in parallel. They compile, debug, and backtest without me touching a single button. i wake up to new equity curves. A Meta EA with 12 strategies. Gold, Nasdaq, USDJPY, Bitcoin. Mean reversion, trend following, breakout.All running simultaneously in one script. Sharpe 2.17. a full hedge fund in a single file. An AI clone of myself answering support tickets on my premium community 24/7 in my exact voice. Trained on everything i ever said. it speaks every language and never sleeps. Voice control from anywhere in my apartment. Screenshot automation in 0.1ms. A phone bridge so i control my entire infrastructure from my pocket. A tweet engine scoring virality. 5 custom AI tools i designed from scratch. 9,000 in prop firm fees turned into 130,000+ in payouts in the last 6 months. 41% CAGR verified with private investor capital. 74 premium members at 80/month. Show me one person who did more in 6 weeks. I will wait.

ZenomTrader

29,347 views • 3 months ago

The most profitable strategy on Polymarket in 2026 is 30 years old and has generated $100 billion. It was not invented by a trader. It was invented by a mathematician Jim Simons, creator of Medallion Fund, the hedge fund that returned 66% annually for 30 years straight and outperformed Buffett, Soros, and all of Wall Street combined. The formula is publicly available, but on Wall Street you need billions and 300 PhDs to run it. On Polymarket you just need a laptop. The entire strategy in one line: small edge × many positions × low correlation. Let me break it down simply. Imagine a coin that lands heads 52 times out of 100. Flip it 10 times and you will not notice the difference. Flip it 10,000 times and you are in profit not probably, but mathematically. Simons did not guess where the market was going. He took hundreds of positions with a tiny edge on each one and waited for statistics to do the work. Some always lost, but the sum of wins was always greater than the sum of losses. On Polymarket this formula works better than anywhere else. Hundreds of markets, prices set by a crowd that makes mistakes every day, inefficiencies at every turn, and the entry threshold is not a billion but $100. I found a wallet that is already trading by this formula. 96 positions spread across politics and sports. Profit: $53K. Sharpe Ratio 3.43, which is higher than Medallion Fund itself and better than 91% of traders on the platform. You can open it and see every trade: 73% on Polymarket are trying to guess and losing. Maybe it is time to start counting?
0:42

The most profitable strategy on Polymarket in 2026 is 30 years old and has generated $100 billion. It was not invented by a trader. It was invented by a mathematician Jim Simons, creator of Medallion Fund, the hedge fund that returned 66% annually for 30 years straight and outperformed Buffett, Soros, and all of Wall Street combined. The formula is publicly available, but on Wall Street you need billions and 300 PhDs to run it. On Polymarket you just need a laptop. The entire strategy in one line: small edge × many positions × low correlation. Let me break it down simply. Imagine a coin that lands heads 52 times out of 100. Flip it 10 times and you will not notice the difference. Flip it 10,000 times and you are in profit not probably, but mathematically. Simons did not guess where the market was going. He took hundreds of positions with a tiny edge on each one and waited for statistics to do the work. Some always lost, but the sum of wins was always greater than the sum of losses. On Polymarket this formula works better than anywhere else. Hundreds of markets, prices set by a crowd that makes mistakes every day, inefficiencies at every turn, and the entry threshold is not a billion but $100. I found a wallet that is already trading by this formula. 96 positions spread across politics and sports. Profit: $53K. Sharpe Ratio 3.43, which is higher than Medallion Fund itself and better than 91% of traders on the platform. You can open it and see every trade: 73% on Polymarket are trying to guess and losing. Maybe it is time to start counting?

Blaze

533,312 views • 4 months ago

Introducing the Lifetimely Profit Agent - powered by the $100Bn in GMV. It uses the benchmarks from across all the GMV in Lifetimely, to find the highest leverage Profit opportunities in your business, and can actually take action to drive Profit. It's live in Lifetimely right now!
0:37

Introducing the Lifetimely Profit Agent - powered by the $100Bn in GMV. It uses the benchmarks from across all the GMV in Lifetimely, to find the highest leverage Profit opportunities in your business, and can actually take action to drive Profit. It's live in Lifetimely right now!

Patrick Barnes

13,790 views • 24 days ago

Crazy that Claude can now autonomously code strategies and validate them on TradingView and it’s actually faster than my pipeline. Time to expand to a third platform for our code TradingView is next. 15+ strategies are waiting to be coded. And a full Meta EA TV version is coming. Probably only 0.001% of the industry is doing this. Huge thanks to Andrew and The Daily Profiler for this pipeline idea.
3:26

Crazy that Claude can now autonomously code strategies and validate them on TradingView and it’s actually faster than my pipeline. Time to expand to a third platform for our code TradingView is next. 15+ strategies are waiting to be coded. And a full Meta EA TV version is coming. Probably only 0.001% of the industry is doing this. Huge thanks to Andrew and The Daily Profiler for this pipeline idea.

ZenomTrader

98,205 views • 2 months ago

I just ran a full research project without doing any research. Lemma by Analemma did everything: 1. Explore I typed a question. It mapped the entire field. Concepts, references, key papers. Done. 2. Survey I asked for a literature review. It gave me 50+ pages with real citations. Not a summary. A publication-grade draft. 3. Code I described an experiment. It wrote the code, ran it, showed results. 4. FARS I gave it a research direction. It generated hypotheses, planned experiments, ran them, and wrote the full paper. Zero input from me after that. This is the first tool I've used that actually runs research instead of just helping you do it. FARS already ran live and produced 100 papers in 10 days. One every 2 hours. Watch it here: This is what "Vibe Research" looks like.
0:30

I just ran a full research project without doing any research. Lemma by Analemma did everything: 1. Explore I typed a question. It mapped the entire field. Concepts, references, key papers. Done. 2. Survey I asked for a literature review. It gave me 50+ pages with real citations. Not a summary. A publication-grade draft. 3. Code I described an experiment. It wrote the code, ran it, showed results. 4. FARS I gave it a research direction. It generated hypotheses, planned experiments, ran them, and wrote the full paper. Zero input from me after that. This is the first tool I've used that actually runs research instead of just helping you do it. FARS already ran live and produced 100 papers in 10 days. One every 2 hours. Watch it here: This is what "Vibe Research" looks like.

Muhammad Ayan

39,960 views • 19 days ago

Elon Musk was asked why his companies move faster than anyone else. His answer: "I'm constantly addressing the limiting factor. Whatever the limiting factor is on speed, I'm going to tackle that. If capital is the limiting factor, I'll solve for capital. If it's not the limiting factor, I'll solve for something else." He then said something most managers never figure out: "If something is going really well and making good progress, there's no point in me spending time on it." "The irony is if something's going really well, they don't see much of me. But if something is the limiting factor, they'll see a lot of me." He spends his time entirely on whatever is blocking the next step. Not on what's interesting. Not on what he's best at. But on whatever is the bottleneck right now. Most leaders do the opposite... They gravitate toward what they're comfortable with and away from the hard problem. From: Dwarkesh Patel and John Collison
1:53

Elon Musk was asked why his companies move faster than anyone else. His answer: "I'm constantly addressing the limiting factor. Whatever the limiting factor is on speed, I'm going to tackle that. If capital is the limiting factor, I'll solve for capital. If it's not the limiting factor, I'll solve for something else." He then said something most managers never figure out: "If something is going really well and making good progress, there's no point in me spending time on it." "The irony is if something's going really well, they don't see much of me. But if something is the limiting factor, they'll see a lot of me." He spends his time entirely on whatever is blocking the next step. Not on what's interesting. Not on what he's best at. But on whatever is the bottleneck right now. Most leaders do the opposite... They gravitate toward what they're comfortable with and away from the hard problem. From: Dwarkesh Patel and John Collison

Founder Mode

1,074,391 views • 2 months ago

The most insane thing i built with AI agents: A full hedge fund in a single file. 7 independent strategies. 2,000 lines of code. 5 symbols. One Expert Advisor. Each strategy has its own trade engine, its own risk parameters, its own magic numbers. They never touch each other. Why one file? Because that's how you control what actually matters: max drawdown across all strategies, overlap prevention so two algos don't stack the same directional bet, and anti-hedging logic for prop firm compliance. Nobody does this. Sharpe ratio above 2. Eight years of data. $100k starting balance. Claude Code launched MetaTrader, configured the parameters, ran the backtest, and switched to the equity curve. I didn't touch anything. Fully autonomous. I shared the exact logic and code structure inside the Discord. This is one of the most ambitious projects i've built so far:not just a strategy, a portfolio engine.
1:29

The most insane thing i built with AI agents: A full hedge fund in a single file. 7 independent strategies. 2,000 lines of code. 5 symbols. One Expert Advisor. Each strategy has its own trade engine, its own risk parameters, its own magic numbers. They never touch each other. Why one file? Because that's how you control what actually matters: max drawdown across all strategies, overlap prevention so two algos don't stack the same directional bet, and anti-hedging logic for prop firm compliance. Nobody does this. Sharpe ratio above 2. Eight years of data. $100k starting balance. Claude Code launched MetaTrader, configured the parameters, ran the backtest, and switched to the equity curve. I didn't touch anything. Fully autonomous. I shared the exact logic and code structure inside the Discord. This is one of the most ambitious projects i've built so far:not just a strategy, a portfolio engine.

ZenomTrader

37,856 views • 4 months ago

I started with $1,000 to $2,000 in prop firm fees and compounded it into $200,000 in net payouts over three years. Sharpe ratio of 6+. CAGR approximately 300% per year. max drawdown around 15%. Most hedge funds never touch that. The secret? I stopped chasing the holy grail strategy and started doing what Jim Simons did at Renaissance Technologies. He wasn't running one perfect system. He was running tens of thousands of mediocre strategies with one thing in common: negative correlation. Like Simons said: "Negative correlation and as many systems as possible." I applied the same playbook to prop firm trading. Instead of optimizing one strategy, i run a portfolio of 7-10 systems that don't move together. When gold crashes, my mean reversion prints. When volatility spikes, my breakout systems win. When the market chops, the range-bound systems make money. PhDs managing billions still can't hit a Sharpe of 1. They laughed when i told them mine is 4+. But they're stuck optimizing for capacity and following rules that Jim Simons himself ignored. The lower the capacity, the higher the edge. I'm trading intraday patterns that billion-dollar funds can't touch because their size won't allow it. Here's the full breakdown:
7:17

I started with $1,000 to $2,000 in prop firm fees and compounded it into $200,000 in net payouts over three years. Sharpe ratio of 6+. CAGR approximately 300% per year. max drawdown around 15%. Most hedge funds never touch that. The secret? I stopped chasing the holy grail strategy and started doing what Jim Simons did at Renaissance Technologies. He wasn't running one perfect system. He was running tens of thousands of mediocre strategies with one thing in common: negative correlation. Like Simons said: "Negative correlation and as many systems as possible." I applied the same playbook to prop firm trading. Instead of optimizing one strategy, i run a portfolio of 7-10 systems that don't move together. When gold crashes, my mean reversion prints. When volatility spikes, my breakout systems win. When the market chops, the range-bound systems make money. PhDs managing billions still can't hit a Sharpe of 1. They laughed when i told them mine is 4+. But they're stuck optimizing for capacity and following rules that Jim Simons himself ignored. The lower the capacity, the higher the edge. I'm trading intraday patterns that billion-dollar funds can't touch because their size won't allow it. Here's the full breakdown:

ZenomTrader

11,560 views • 3 months ago

“code is cheap, anyone can code with ai” sure, but the bottleneck has never been coding and it still never is. so if you misunderstand the real differentiating factor, you’re not gonna make it.
2:37

“code is cheap, anyone can code with ai” sure, but the bottleneck has never been coding and it still never is. so if you misunderstand the real differentiating factor, you’re not gonna make it.

ℏεsam

23,408 views • 5 months ago

Computer use is now in Claude Code. Claude can open your apps, click through your UI, and test what it built, right from the CLI. Now in research preview on Pro and Max plans.
0:45

Computer use is now in Claude Code. Claude can open your apps, click through your UI, and test what it built, right from the CLI. Now in research preview on Pro and Max plans.

Claude

16,152,255 views • 3 months ago

Trump to Senate Republicans: "I thought we would have a discussion after the press leaves about what last night represented and what we should do about it. And also about the shutdown...the shutdown was a big factor, negative, for the Republicans. And they say that I wasn't on the ballot was the biggest factor. I don't know about that but I was honored that they said that."
0:29

Trump to Senate Republicans: "I thought we would have a discussion after the press leaves about what last night represented and what we should do about it. And also about the shutdown...the shutdown was a big factor, negative, for the Republicans. And they say that I wasn't on the ballot was the biggest factor. I don't know about that but I was honored that they said that."

The Bulwark

390,672 views • 7 months ago

The biggest risk in prop trading isn't a bad strategy. It's getting banned for hedging you didn't even know about. Prop firms spend millions trying to catch traders running opposite positions on CFD accounts. You go long XAUUSD on FTMO, short XAUUSD on FundedNext that's an instant violation. They keep your money and you never find out why. Nobody talks about this. It's disgusting. I used Claude Code to build a hedge detection engine that catches this before they do. It scans every trade across every CFD portfolio. Direct hedges, correlated instruments like USTEC vs NAS100, overlap duration, risk scores from 0 to 100. This is probably the best tool ever created in the history of prop firms. I'm a verified track record trader. All strategies profitable. I'm running multiple funded accounts simultaneously. Zero violations. Banning someone like me is a direct declaration of war against profitable traders. Mathematically, prop firms make more money from rule breakers than from traders who just lose. The violations are the real profit center. But now i can see exactly what they see. Remove the problem strategy, rebuild, clean. If you're running multiple CFD accounts without checking for hedge conflicts, they will catch you. It's not a matter of if. Probably only 0.1% of traders have a tool like this. One person. One AI agent. Built what entire compliance teams can't. This is QuantDash Pro.
1:35

The biggest risk in prop trading isn't a bad strategy. It's getting banned for hedging you didn't even know about. Prop firms spend millions trying to catch traders running opposite positions on CFD accounts. You go long XAUUSD on FTMO, short XAUUSD on FundedNext that's an instant violation. They keep your money and you never find out why. Nobody talks about this. It's disgusting. I used Claude Code to build a hedge detection engine that catches this before they do. It scans every trade across every CFD portfolio. Direct hedges, correlated instruments like USTEC vs NAS100, overlap duration, risk scores from 0 to 100. This is probably the best tool ever created in the history of prop firms. I'm a verified track record trader. All strategies profitable. I'm running multiple funded accounts simultaneously. Zero violations. Banning someone like me is a direct declaration of war against profitable traders. Mathematically, prop firms make more money from rule breakers than from traders who just lose. The violations are the real profit center. But now i can see exactly what they see. Remove the problem strategy, rebuild, clean. If you're running multiple CFD accounts without checking for hedge conflicts, they will catch you. It's not a matter of if. Probably only 0.1% of traders have a tool like this. One person. One AI agent. Built what entire compliance teams can't. This is QuantDash Pro.

ZenomTrader

13,530 views • 4 months ago

Does anyone know what this is? I came across it and couldn’t figure it out, it looks unusual and kind of interesting at the same time. Have you ever seen something like this before, or do you have any idea what it could be?
1:06

Does anyone know what this is? I came across it and couldn’t figure it out, it looks unusual and kind of interesting at the same time. Have you ever seen something like this before, or do you have any idea what it could be?

Dr. CZ

1,869,240 views • 3 months ago

Shannon Sharpe says he had a chance to get into Google early but got talked out of it. Shannon Sharpe: “I remember when Google came out and they thought the shares would open around $85.” “I had just signed with the Ravens, so I finally had some money.” “I told my financial guys I wanted to put about $300,000 in.” “It opens at $115, and they tell me it’s overpriced and gonna come back down.” Mark Cuban : “But they don’t have the profit… yeah, I’ve done that, I know.” “It’s like Nvidia right now. I told myself I’d wait for a dip, same thing my son did.” “And then my son is laughing at me like, ‘Who’s the expert now?’” Shannon Sharpe : “And you think about it… how many times has Google split since then?” Mark Cuban : “It’s worth over $3 trillion now.” “Trillions. Not billions. A thousand billions.” Shannon Sharpe: “Yes. So with that my investment, I'd have been a billionaire with you, Mark.”
1:00

Shannon Sharpe says he had a chance to get into Google early but got talked out of it. Shannon Sharpe: “I remember when Google came out and they thought the shares would open around $85.” “I had just signed with the Ravens, so I finally had some money.” “I told my financial guys I wanted to put about $300,000 in.” “It opens at $115, and they tell me it’s overpriced and gonna come back down.” Mark Cuban : “But they don’t have the profit… yeah, I’ve done that, I know.” “It’s like Nvidia right now. I told myself I’d wait for a dip, same thing my son did.” “And then my son is laughing at me like, ‘Who’s the expert now?’” Shannon Sharpe : “And you think about it… how many times has Google split since then?” Mark Cuban : “It’s worth over $3 trillion now.” “Trillions. Not billions. A thousand billions.” Shannon Sharpe: “Yes. So with that my investment, I'd have been a billionaire with you, Mark.”

KΞRL_✂️

952,627 views • 15 days ago

Shannon Sharpe interviewed Kamala Harris yesterday, and it was an embarrassment for both of them. Sharpe showed up in a suit so tight it could’ve been a onesie. He’s just the latest example of the feminization of men.
3:47

Shannon Sharpe interviewed Kamala Harris yesterday, and it was an embarrassment for both of them. Sharpe showed up in a suit so tight it could’ve been a onesie. He’s just the latest example of the feminization of men.

Jason Whitlock

822,058 views • 1 year ago

"Right now, he's the hands down unanimous MVP... [The Sixers] are the real deal. Joel Embiid right now is the unanimous MVP and nobody is close to it. And I love Nikola Jokic." Agree with Shannon Sharpe? 🤔 (via First Take)
0:48

"Right now, he's the hands down unanimous MVP... [The Sixers] are the real deal. Joel Embiid right now is the unanimous MVP and nobody is close to it. And I love Nikola Jokic." Agree with Shannon Sharpe? 🤔 (via First Take)

ClutchPoints

261,357 views • 2 years ago