Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

cuck helps his gf use her dildo on cam for 100+ ppl (server in comment section) #nsfw #nsfwtwt #discord #esex #dildo #dildoplay #camshow #backshots #doggystyle #cheating #cuck

cutiealinaa's profile picture

Alina

46,108 subscribers

40,561 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#nsfw#nsfwtwt#discord#esex#dildo#dildoplay#camshow#backshots#doggystyle#cheating#cuck
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Title- Your cuck bf bets you in a game with his friend (cheating audio) [15 MINUTES] (Dm for custom audios <3) longest audio #cuckhold #cuck #intox #cheating #cheatinggf #nsfw #audio #cheater #nsfwrp #bull #roleplay #cnc #rough #slut #nsfw #nsfwtwt #sizekink
14:49

Sensitive content

Title- Your cuck bf bets you in a game with his friend (cheating audio) [15 MINUTES] (Dm for custom audios <3) longest audio #cuckhold #cuck #intox #cheating #cheatinggf #nsfw #audio #cheater #nsfwrp #bull #roleplay #cnc #rough #slut #nsfw #nsfwtwt #sizekink

Violet_bakes69

57,853 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

doing crazy deals on content only for tonight dm me while you can 😻 #paypig #selling #nsfwtwt #cnc #nsfw #rapebait #agegap #dick #bbc #stroking #rapekink #ddlg #breeding #ageplay #cnc #freeuse #petplay #breedingkink #wetpussy #dildo #bbc #bwc #anal #ass #assplay #kink #menu #content #cheating #cheatingkink #slut #cuck #cuckqueen #sneaky
1:50

Sensitive content

doing crazy deals on content only for tonight dm me while you can 😻 #paypig #selling #nsfwtwt #cnc #nsfw #rapebait #agegap #dick #bbc #stroking #rapekink #ddlg #breeding #ageplay #cnc #freeuse #petplay #breedingkink #wetpussy #dildo #bbc #bwc #anal #ass #assplay #kink #menu #content #cheating #cheatingkink #slut #cuck #cuckqueen #sneaky

ava

14,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Content Creator Cole Alexander goes tf off on Offset for pulling up in his comment section after he gave his opinion about Offset’s alleged “I Won” post 🤣🤣 “Bro you wife a Bronx stripper and had 3 kids with her and expected it to work out and have a family. What did you win? You wasted your seed on a b*tch who use to drug men in various clubs in nyc” “White does me being white has do with your wife getting donkey f*cked by another man, while she had your baby in her stomach?”
0:54

Content Creator Cole Alexander goes tf off on Offset for pulling up in his comment section after he gave his opinion about Offset’s alleged “I Won” post 🤣🤣 “Bro you wife a Bronx stripper and had 3 kids with her and expected it to work out and have a family. What did you win? You wasted your seed on a b*tch who use to drug men in various clubs in nyc” “White does me being white has do with your wife getting donkey f*cked by another man, while she had your baby in her stomach?”

✨GOT DA SCOOP✨

37,574 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Got a Discord ping from my cousin in Cleveland last Tuesday. Screenshot of his Stripe: $34,917.43 in October. I asked what he sold. "Books." He's 19. Hasn't written one. Hasn't read one of his own. 100 of them on Amazon under 7 pen names since February. His grandma bought one at the Walmart in Akron last month. He didn't have the heart to tell her she paid $14.99 for ChatGPT. Stephen King wrote 65 books in 50 years. My cousin did 100 in 8 months. His Discord status still says "studying for finals." Three tools. One model. He doesn't even pay for Claude. The mechanism is so stupid Amazon hasn't bothered to ban it. They take 30% of every sale and it adds up. The 0.625-inch margin rule kills 90% of people before their first royalty. Nobody talks about it because the people who know are too busy clearing $4,200 a day. Penguin Random House: 10,000 employees. 85,000 books a year. 90% cut from their authors. My cousin: 100 books. $34,917 in October. 7 pen names. 12,400 copies of his top seller. 0 sentences typed by hand. Amazon's ToS section 8.4 closes the window on January 1st. 64 days left. Some guy wrote up the mechanism. 12 minutes. Every step. Every margin trick. In 8 months somebody from your year buys his parents a house. He read this tonight. You scrolled.
0:54

Got a Discord ping from my cousin in Cleveland last Tuesday. Screenshot of his Stripe: $34,917.43 in October. I asked what he sold. "Books." He's 19. Hasn't written one. Hasn't read one of his own. 100 of them on Amazon under 7 pen names since February. His grandma bought one at the Walmart in Akron last month. He didn't have the heart to tell her she paid $14.99 for ChatGPT. Stephen King wrote 65 books in 50 years. My cousin did 100 in 8 months. His Discord status still says "studying for finals." Three tools. One model. He doesn't even pay for Claude. The mechanism is so stupid Amazon hasn't bothered to ban it. They take 30% of every sale and it adds up. The 0.625-inch margin rule kills 90% of people before their first royalty. Nobody talks about it because the people who know are too busy clearing $4,200 a day. Penguin Random House: 10,000 employees. 85,000 books a year. 90% cut from their authors. My cousin: 100 books. $34,917 in October. 7 pen names. 12,400 copies of his top seller. 0 sentences typed by hand. Amazon's ToS section 8.4 closes the window on January 1st. 64 days left. Some guy wrote up the mechanism. 12 minutes. Every step. Every margin trick. In 8 months somebody from your year buys his parents a house. He read this tonight. You scrolled.

Raytar

187,350 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

So the Demenishki situation is basically: >She states she's not okay with 🌽 >ChibiReviews calls her out for "virtue signaling" >Gets labeled a "hypocrite" for reposting l3wd artwork >She replies under Chibi's post, in the most stereotypical mean girl tone, mocks him for one of his past incidents which made him almost off himself >"OMG, aren't you the guy who got cheated on by his fiancee, and all your friends ended up siding with her?" >Irked a ton of people, gets asked to take accountability for her words. >She refused, but doubled down instead. >People found out that she got back with her old abusive ex-bf whom legitimately stabbed her. >"Sympathy for me but not for thee", gets called out for hypocrisy again. >Makes a fake engagement post about "addressing the drama" by linking her 24/7 re-running channel. >Well 3rd times the charm, she gets labeled a hypocrite through one of her older tweets talking about hating engagement farmers. >Can't stop giving the internet more reasons to hate her. >Multiple old clips surface on twitter where it sounds like she's getting fked on stream and moans. >10+ million views across all of those clips, with one of them even allegedly being taken down by her. >People full on documenting every suspicious thing with a list full of timestamps on the VODs themselves. >Comments keep getting deleted with several people reposting those same comments on the old VODs. >Deme's art tag literally gets obliterated with so much AI cuck 🌽 >Every single Japan trip tweet of hers in real time, has replies mocking her every action, gets called obese based on one of her older photos she showed on stream. >Her older photo stirs up another drama about obese women, after Asmongold's "L" take. >She denies the "fkin on stream" allegation, calls it a smear campaign, says Nikita (her bf) was streaming at the same time on discord. >You are here. I'm legitimately finding myself having to keep my eyes glued open for what's to be the next development in this saga. 🗿
0:21

Sensitive content

So the Demenishki situation is basically: >She states she's not okay with 🌽 >ChibiReviews calls her out for "virtue signaling" >Gets labeled a "hypocrite" for reposting l3wd artwork >She replies under Chibi's post, in the most stereotypical mean girl tone, mocks him for one of his past incidents which made him almost off himself >"OMG, aren't you the guy who got cheated on by his fiancee, and all your friends ended up siding with her?" >Irked a ton of people, gets asked to take accountability for her words. >She refused, but doubled down instead. >People found out that she got back with her old abusive ex-bf whom legitimately stabbed her. >"Sympathy for me but not for thee", gets called out for hypocrisy again. >Makes a fake engagement post about "addressing the drama" by linking her 24/7 re-running channel. >Well 3rd times the charm, she gets labeled a hypocrite through one of her older tweets talking about hating engagement farmers. >Can't stop giving the internet more reasons to hate her. >Multiple old clips surface on twitter where it sounds like she's getting fked on stream and moans. >10+ million views across all of those clips, with one of them even allegedly being taken down by her. >People full on documenting every suspicious thing with a list full of timestamps on the VODs themselves. >Comments keep getting deleted with several people reposting those same comments on the old VODs. >Deme's art tag literally gets obliterated with so much AI cuck 🌽 >Every single Japan trip tweet of hers in real time, has replies mocking her every action, gets called obese based on one of her older photos she showed on stream. >Her older photo stirs up another drama about obese women, after Asmongold's "L" take. >She denies the "fkin on stream" allegation, calls it a smear campaign, says Nikita (her bf) was streaming at the same time on discord. >You are here. I'm legitimately finding myself having to keep my eyes glued open for what's to be the next development in this saga. 🗿

✨ 𝗗𝗔𝗥𝗞 ✨ Shitposter Detective

99,509 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Maddy May reveals her ex-husband begged her to shoot a scene with his idol Johnny Sins as a parting fantasy before their split: "He was never a cuck, but he liked his childhood child dream was Johnny Sins." ​"He wanted Johnny Sins to fuck you?" ​"Yes." ​"Before we split, he was like, 'Can you fuck Johnny Sins and send me the video?' I was like, 'For real?' So I messaged Johnny, I was like, 'Hey, I know I don't know you yet, but my ex-husband is one of your biggest fans... and he wants me to fuck you and send it to him.'" ​"And Johnny Sins is like, 'Sure, I'll be there at 5:00.'" ​"He's like, 'I've got delivery on call. I'm here.'" ​"How was the Johnny Sins experience?" ​"He fucked me in positions that I didn't know were possible as a man. There was one... I thought, like, we were literally on top of each other, but he was fucking me and I'm like, 'How?'" ​"While totally flat?" ​"Yes! But it felt good! But he wasn't going up and down, it was like... and I sat there afterwards, I'm like, 'What?'" ​"So it's like missionary, but you're just like pancakes." ​"Yes! But the way he was moving, it was different than just missionary." ​"Did you describe this to your husband the same way you just described it to us?" ​"I just sent him the video. I said, 'Enjoy.'" ​"And so you didn't say like, 'Oh, it was fucking amazing'? Like would that have turned him on?" ​"He asked. He's like, 'So, was it everything that I was hoping it would be?'" ​"Oh, he's a cuck for sure." ​"100%. He's a cuck for Johnny."
1:34

Sensitive content

Maddy May reveals her ex-husband begged her to shoot a scene with his idol Johnny Sins as a parting fantasy before their split: "He was never a cuck, but he liked his childhood child dream was Johnny Sins." ​"He wanted Johnny Sins to fuck you?" ​"Yes." ​"Before we split, he was like, 'Can you fuck Johnny Sins and send me the video?' I was like, 'For real?' So I messaged Johnny, I was like, 'Hey, I know I don't know you yet, but my ex-husband is one of your biggest fans... and he wants me to fuck you and send it to him.'" ​"And Johnny Sins is like, 'Sure, I'll be there at 5:00.'" ​"He's like, 'I've got delivery on call. I'm here.'" ​"How was the Johnny Sins experience?" ​"He fucked me in positions that I didn't know were possible as a man. There was one... I thought, like, we were literally on top of each other, but he was fucking me and I'm like, 'How?'" ​"While totally flat?" ​"Yes! But it felt good! But he wasn't going up and down, it was like... and I sat there afterwards, I'm like, 'What?'" ​"So it's like missionary, but you're just like pancakes." ​"Yes! But the way he was moving, it was different than just missionary." ​"Did you describe this to your husband the same way you just described it to us?" ​"I just sent him the video. I said, 'Enjoy.'" ​"And so you didn't say like, 'Oh, it was fucking amazing'? Like would that have turned him on?" ​"He asked. He's like, 'So, was it everything that I was hoping it would be?'" ​"Oh, he's a cuck for sure." ​"100%. He's a cuck for Johnny."

nexa_sama

978,009 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

🚨NEW: Candace just released blurry footage of Tyler Robinson on the roof shooting Charlie Kirk — and somehow this helps her case? She ridiculously claims a .30-06 would "take out your shoulder," a scope would leave you with "a black eye," and describes crawling with a rifle as some sort of elite military maneuver. Candace Owens's footage is blurrier than the original FBI footage because it's a camera recording a screen. But look at what she actually showed us: Tyler Robinson, prone, pointing a rifle at Charlie Kirk — then getting up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Of course the footage doesn't show his face. It was never going to. Wide-angle camera, across a parking lot, and he wore sunglasses and his white-logo Hurley hat the entire time he was on campus. They don't need his face. They have corroborating evidence: -Confessed over text to his boyfriend -Confessed on Discord -Confessed in a handwritten note under a keyboard -His parents identified him from the footage, then he confessed to them too — they called a former deputy, and he turned himself in for murdering Charlie. -He described exactly how his rifle was hidden — wrapped in a towel — before that detail was ever public. That's the same rifle later recovered wrapped in a towel in the woods near campus. -His DNA. His car at the scene. His phone's Google Maps data placing him there with a direct route back to his home. The Dremel tool used to etch messages on the bullets found by his rifle and at his home. -The medical examiner recovering fragments of a .30-caliber class bullet in Charlie. There's more evidence here than in most murder convictions — and we still haven't seen what they pulled from the search warrants on his phone, iCloud, Gmail, Discord, and dashcam. So all Candace did was release blurry footage of the shot itself and call a basic crawl while holding a rifle an attempt to imply this was a trained professional, and therefore couldn't be Tyler. Wouldn't a professional shoot center mass or head? Tyler's own parents instantly recognized him. But somehow Candace has spent ten months telling millions of people she's 100% sure it isn't him? Shoutout to Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton for the elite baby crawl footage — give him a follow!
1:30

🚨NEW: Candace just released blurry footage of Tyler Robinson on the roof shooting Charlie Kirk — and somehow this helps her case? She ridiculously claims a .30-06 would "take out your shoulder," a scope would leave you with "a black eye," and describes crawling with a rifle as some sort of elite military maneuver. Candace Owens's footage is blurrier than the original FBI footage because it's a camera recording a screen. But look at what she actually showed us: Tyler Robinson, prone, pointing a rifle at Charlie Kirk — then getting up and running the moment Charlie was shot. Of course the footage doesn't show his face. It was never going to. Wide-angle camera, across a parking lot, and he wore sunglasses and his white-logo Hurley hat the entire time he was on campus. They don't need his face. They have corroborating evidence: -Confessed over text to his boyfriend -Confessed on Discord -Confessed in a handwritten note under a keyboard -His parents identified him from the footage, then he confessed to them too — they called a former deputy, and he turned himself in for murdering Charlie. -He described exactly how his rifle was hidden — wrapped in a towel — before that detail was ever public. That's the same rifle later recovered wrapped in a towel in the woods near campus. -His DNA. His car at the scene. His phone's Google Maps data placing him there with a direct route back to his home. The Dremel tool used to etch messages on the bullets found by his rifle and at his home. -The medical examiner recovering fragments of a .30-caliber class bullet in Charlie. There's more evidence here than in most murder convictions — and we still haven't seen what they pulled from the search warrants on his phone, iCloud, Gmail, Discord, and dashcam. So all Candace did was release blurry footage of the shot itself and call a basic crawl while holding a rifle an attempt to imply this was a trained professional, and therefore couldn't be Tyler. Wouldn't a professional shoot center mass or head? Tyler's own parents instantly recognized him. But somehow Candace has spent ten months telling millions of people she's 100% sure it isn't him? Shoutout to Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton for the elite baby crawl footage — give him a follow!

KanekoaTheGreat

111,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What is an Automated Market Maker (AMM)? ************* Notes: The video is attached. Links to the shorts on other platforms are in the second Tweet. Voting on fees using your LP tokens is limited to the 8 biggest LP holders. For auctions, the discount gets you close to 0% but not effectively 0%. The math example couldn’t exist in reality based on G3M. It is just an example to explain the process. ************* Imagine a robot (AMM) that's always ready to help you trade your money (assets) with others on a special online platform (the XRP Ledger's decentralised exchange). This robot doesn’t need to find someone else to take the other side of your trade; it just makes the trade happen using a big pot of money (pool) it manages. How Does it Work? Trading: You can swap one type of money (asset) for another anytime you want, using the robot’s pot of money. The robot uses a special formula to decide the swap rate. Creating a Pool: Anyone can create a new pot of money for two different types of assets if it doesn’t exist yet, or add to an existing one. Rewards for Pool Creators: People who add money to the pot (liquidity providers) get special tokens (LP Tokens) as a thank-you. These tokens can be used to: • Get a share of the money in the pot back, along with some extra (fees collected). • Have a say in changing the robot’s settings, like trading fees. • Bid to get a temporary discount on trading fees. Risks and Rewards: If many people are swapping money and the pot stays balanced, the people who added money to the pot earn some passive income from the fees. But, if the value of the assets changes a lot, they might lose some money. More Technical Bits: Exchange Rate: The robot adjusts the swap rate based on how much each asset has in its pot. If it has a lot of one asset, that asset becomes cheaper to swap. Trading Fees: The robot charges a small fee for each swap, which goes to the people who added money to the pot. Voting on Fees: People with LP Tokens can vote to change the trading fee; the more tokens you have, the more your vote counts. Auction Slot: There’s a special feature where you can bid to get a discount on trading fees for a day. You bid with LP Tokens, and if you win, you (and up to 4 friends) pay no trading fees for 24 hours. LP Tokens: These are special tokens you get for adding money to the pot. They can be traded, used to vote on fees, or redeemed to pull your money out of the pot. Deleting an AMM: If all the money gets pulled out of the pot, the robot (AMM) gets deleted. But, it can be recreated by adding money to the pot again. In a Nutshell: An AMM is like a robot banker that helps people easily swap different types of money using a big shared pot. People who add money to the pot get special tokens and can earn fees from the swaps, but there are some risks if the market changes a lot. They can also vote on settings and bid for fee discounts. If the pot empties, the robot goes away but can be brought back by refilling the pot. Let’s look at an Example: Step 1: Creating a Money Pot with the AMM Robot Alice creates a new money pot (AMM) using the robot. She chooses two types of money: US Dollars (USD) and XRP. She puts in: 1000 USD 10 XRP In this example, we assume an exchange rate of $1 per XRP for easy math. Alice gets special tokens (LP Tokens) from the robot as a thank-you for adding money to the pot. These tokens prove she added money and can be used later to get her money back, plus some extra if the robot earns fees. Step 2: Bob Makes a Swap Bob wants to swap his 100 USD for XRP. He doesn’t have to wait for someone to take his offer; the robot does it instantly using the money in the pot. The robot uses a formula to decide how much XRP Bob gets for his 100 USD, ensuring it's a fair rate based on how much USD and XRP are in the pot. Step 3: Earning Fees The robot charges Bob a small fee, let’s say 1%, for convenience. So, Bob pays 1 USD as a fee, which stays in the pot. Now, the pot has more money than it started with, which is good for Alice because she can earn that extra when she uses her LP Tokens. Step 4: Alice Withdraws Her Money After some time, Alice decides to take her money out of the pot. Thanks to the fees the robot earned from Bob and others, the pot has grown to: 1101 USD 9 XRP Alice uses her LP Tokens to claim her share of the money in the pot. If she puts in 100% of the original money, she gets 100% of what’s in the pot now, including the extra earned from fees. Step 5: Voting and Discounts Alice can also use her LP Tokens to vote on things, like changing the robot’s fee. And, if she wants a discount on fees, she can bid for a special 24-hour discount slot using her LP Tokens. Conclusion In this example, the AMM robot helped Alice earn extra money by providing a convenient way for Bob to swap his USD for XRP. Alice took on some risk by putting her money into the pot, but she earned fees from Bob’s and others’ trades as a reward. Bob enjoyed the convenience of instant, hassle-free trading. And the AMM robot managed it all automatically!
6:08

What is an Automated Market Maker (AMM)? ************* Notes: The video is attached. Links to the shorts on other platforms are in the second Tweet. Voting on fees using your LP tokens is limited to the 8 biggest LP holders. For auctions, the discount gets you close to 0% but not effectively 0%. The math example couldn’t exist in reality based on G3M. It is just an example to explain the process. ************* Imagine a robot (AMM) that's always ready to help you trade your money (assets) with others on a special online platform (the XRP Ledger's decentralised exchange). This robot doesn’t need to find someone else to take the other side of your trade; it just makes the trade happen using a big pot of money (pool) it manages. How Does it Work? Trading: You can swap one type of money (asset) for another anytime you want, using the robot’s pot of money. The robot uses a special formula to decide the swap rate. Creating a Pool: Anyone can create a new pot of money for two different types of assets if it doesn’t exist yet, or add to an existing one. Rewards for Pool Creators: People who add money to the pot (liquidity providers) get special tokens (LP Tokens) as a thank-you. These tokens can be used to: • Get a share of the money in the pot back, along with some extra (fees collected). • Have a say in changing the robot’s settings, like trading fees. • Bid to get a temporary discount on trading fees. Risks and Rewards: If many people are swapping money and the pot stays balanced, the people who added money to the pot earn some passive income from the fees. But, if the value of the assets changes a lot, they might lose some money. More Technical Bits: Exchange Rate: The robot adjusts the swap rate based on how much each asset has in its pot. If it has a lot of one asset, that asset becomes cheaper to swap. Trading Fees: The robot charges a small fee for each swap, which goes to the people who added money to the pot. Voting on Fees: People with LP Tokens can vote to change the trading fee; the more tokens you have, the more your vote counts. Auction Slot: There’s a special feature where you can bid to get a discount on trading fees for a day. You bid with LP Tokens, and if you win, you (and up to 4 friends) pay no trading fees for 24 hours. LP Tokens: These are special tokens you get for adding money to the pot. They can be traded, used to vote on fees, or redeemed to pull your money out of the pot. Deleting an AMM: If all the money gets pulled out of the pot, the robot (AMM) gets deleted. But, it can be recreated by adding money to the pot again. In a Nutshell: An AMM is like a robot banker that helps people easily swap different types of money using a big shared pot. People who add money to the pot get special tokens and can earn fees from the swaps, but there are some risks if the market changes a lot. They can also vote on settings and bid for fee discounts. If the pot empties, the robot goes away but can be brought back by refilling the pot. Let’s look at an Example: Step 1: Creating a Money Pot with the AMM Robot Alice creates a new money pot (AMM) using the robot. She chooses two types of money: US Dollars (USD) and XRP. She puts in: 1000 USD 10 XRP In this example, we assume an exchange rate of $1 per XRP for easy math. Alice gets special tokens (LP Tokens) from the robot as a thank-you for adding money to the pot. These tokens prove she added money and can be used later to get her money back, plus some extra if the robot earns fees. Step 2: Bob Makes a Swap Bob wants to swap his 100 USD for XRP. He doesn’t have to wait for someone to take his offer; the robot does it instantly using the money in the pot. The robot uses a formula to decide how much XRP Bob gets for his 100 USD, ensuring it's a fair rate based on how much USD and XRP are in the pot. Step 3: Earning Fees The robot charges Bob a small fee, let’s say 1%, for convenience. So, Bob pays 1 USD as a fee, which stays in the pot. Now, the pot has more money than it started with, which is good for Alice because she can earn that extra when she uses her LP Tokens. Step 4: Alice Withdraws Her Money After some time, Alice decides to take her money out of the pot. Thanks to the fees the robot earned from Bob and others, the pot has grown to: 1101 USD 9 XRP Alice uses her LP Tokens to claim her share of the money in the pot. If she puts in 100% of the original money, she gets 100% of what’s in the pot now, including the extra earned from fees. Step 5: Voting and Discounts Alice can also use her LP Tokens to vote on things, like changing the robot’s fee. And, if she wants a discount on fees, she can bid for a special 24-hour discount slot using her LP Tokens. Conclusion In this example, the AMM robot helped Alice earn extra money by providing a convenient way for Bob to swap his USD for XRP. Alice took on some risk by putting her money into the pot, but she earned fees from Bob’s and others’ trades as a reward. Bob enjoyed the convenience of instant, hassle-free trading. And the AMM robot managed it all automatically!

Daniel "CEO of the XRPL" Keller

238,600 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I already answered most of this in my last post, but I’ll go through it again for you Jimmy Dore. - What appears to be the towel-wrapped rifle is visible in multiple video frames. The reason we know it was him and his rifle on the roof is because of the corroborating evidence. Investigators recovered and photographed his rifle, wrapped in a towel, in the woods along the shooter’s escape route. Robinson’s texts discussed retrieving “my rifle” and he wrote, “Judging from today, I’d say grandpa’s gun does just fine.” His father identified him and his rifle from the photographs and confronted him about it. Why was Tyler Robinson's rifle hundreds of miles from his home stashed in the woods next to where Charlie Kirk was shot? Why do his texts about retrieving it coincide with doorbell footage showing his car near the hiding place and a Google Maps route on his phone leading from that area back to his home in Orem? - Tyler Robinson was the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver. The rifle results reached at least one trillion to one. Robinson’s profile was approximately 95% of the DNA mixture on the towel and 89% on the screwdriver. One unusable swab from one exposed section of the roof changes none of that. Why was Robinson the primary DNA contributor on all three items, including the screwdriver left on the roof? - Show me the evidence that bomb-sniffing dogs searched the rifle’s exact location, found nothing, and then the FBI “magically” discovered it. I have never seen evidence supporting that claim. If you're claiming the FBI planted the rifle, why did Robinson text about retrieving “my rifle”? Why are those text messages corroborated by Ring doorbell footage showing his car in that location and Google Maps data on his phone? Why did forensic analysis identify the same Dremel as having engraved the “test shot” casing found at Robinson’s home, the fired casing inside the rifle, and three unfired cartridges loaded into it? Why had Robinson asked his boyfriend for that Dremel a month earlier to engrave bullets? Why did he later text Lance: “Remember how I was engraving bullets? The messages were mostly a big meme, if I see “notices bulge UWU” on fox news I might have a stroke”? Are you claiming the FBI planted the rifle, Dremel, and the engraved casing while also fabricating Robinson's texts, Ring footage, and Google Maps data? Then forced Lance Twiggs to lie about it in his sworn testimony? - The Discord confession timeline was confirmed in court. SBI Agent Brian Davis testified that Robinson arrived at the sheriff’s office at approximately 9:00 p.m. on September 11. His Discord confession was posted at 7:57 p.m. Utah time, about an hour earlier. He even said he would be “surrendering through a sheriff friend in a few moments.” - The defense has had Robinson’s forensic phone extraction and records from Apple, Google, Verizon, and AT&T since March, including 25,253 cell-site records. Those records can verify his location, tower connections, app activity, and communications. The defense has not claimed that his confessions were fabricated or presented an alibi placing him somewhere other than UVU. If they had bombshell evidence to free their client, why didn't they use it to stop the preliminary from ever proceeding to a death penalty trial? - Once again, you misunderstand DNA degradation. It does not reveal when DNA was deposited or who touched an object first or last. DNA can even be immediately degraded when it's first transfered to an item. The experts could not determine precisely how, why, or when the degradation occurred. Robinson is the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver. - The charging documents, supported by SBI Agent Brian Davis’s sworn probable-cause statement, say Robinson’s mother thought the suspect looked like her son and his father agreed. His parents were interviewed after bringing him to the sheriff’s office and may testify at trial. They likely recorded those interviews with the parents and may show this at the trial. - Turning yourself in for a crime does not automatically prove guilt, but it is highly relevant. Especially when combined with multiple confessions, the suspected murder weapon hidden near the scene, DNA evidence, both parents identifying him, Robinson identifying himself as the person in the footage ("it was me... look at the surveillance footage. it was me." "Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. it was me at UVU yesterday."), his partner recognizing him and recounting his in-person confession, a written confession note, and Robinson surrendering. A confession alone is objectively strong evidence and he confessed multiple times to multiple people. - Show me the evidence that Robinson was told police were going to SWAT his house and endanger his family. I have never seen any evidence supporting that claim. - Citing an old Andrew Wilson clip without context is silly. Intelligent people operating in good-faith update their conclusions as more evidence becomes available.
3:25

I already answered most of this in my last post, but I’ll go through it again for you Jimmy Dore. - What appears to be the towel-wrapped rifle is visible in multiple video frames. The reason we know it was him and his rifle on the roof is because of the corroborating evidence. Investigators recovered and photographed his rifle, wrapped in a towel, in the woods along the shooter’s escape route. Robinson’s texts discussed retrieving “my rifle” and he wrote, “Judging from today, I’d say grandpa’s gun does just fine.” His father identified him and his rifle from the photographs and confronted him about it. Why was Tyler Robinson's rifle hundreds of miles from his home stashed in the woods next to where Charlie Kirk was shot? Why do his texts about retrieving it coincide with doorbell footage showing his car near the hiding place and a Google Maps route on his phone leading from that area back to his home in Orem? - Tyler Robinson was the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver. The rifle results reached at least one trillion to one. Robinson’s profile was approximately 95% of the DNA mixture on the towel and 89% on the screwdriver. One unusable swab from one exposed section of the roof changes none of that. Why was Robinson the primary DNA contributor on all three items, including the screwdriver left on the roof? - Show me the evidence that bomb-sniffing dogs searched the rifle’s exact location, found nothing, and then the FBI “magically” discovered it. I have never seen evidence supporting that claim. If you're claiming the FBI planted the rifle, why did Robinson text about retrieving “my rifle”? Why are those text messages corroborated by Ring doorbell footage showing his car in that location and Google Maps data on his phone? Why did forensic analysis identify the same Dremel as having engraved the “test shot” casing found at Robinson’s home, the fired casing inside the rifle, and three unfired cartridges loaded into it? Why had Robinson asked his boyfriend for that Dremel a month earlier to engrave bullets? Why did he later text Lance: “Remember how I was engraving bullets? The messages were mostly a big meme, if I see “notices bulge UWU” on fox news I might have a stroke”? Are you claiming the FBI planted the rifle, Dremel, and the engraved casing while also fabricating Robinson's texts, Ring footage, and Google Maps data? Then forced Lance Twiggs to lie about it in his sworn testimony? - The Discord confession timeline was confirmed in court. SBI Agent Brian Davis testified that Robinson arrived at the sheriff’s office at approximately 9:00 p.m. on September 11. His Discord confession was posted at 7:57 p.m. Utah time, about an hour earlier. He even said he would be “surrendering through a sheriff friend in a few moments.” - The defense has had Robinson’s forensic phone extraction and records from Apple, Google, Verizon, and AT&T since March, including 25,253 cell-site records. Those records can verify his location, tower connections, app activity, and communications. The defense has not claimed that his confessions were fabricated or presented an alibi placing him somewhere other than UVU. If they had bombshell evidence to free their client, why didn't they use it to stop the preliminary from ever proceeding to a death penalty trial? - Once again, you misunderstand DNA degradation. It does not reveal when DNA was deposited or who touched an object first or last. DNA can even be immediately degraded when it's first transfered to an item. The experts could not determine precisely how, why, or when the degradation occurred. Robinson is the major DNA contributor on the rifle, towel, and screwdriver. - The charging documents, supported by SBI Agent Brian Davis’s sworn probable-cause statement, say Robinson’s mother thought the suspect looked like her son and his father agreed. His parents were interviewed after bringing him to the sheriff’s office and may testify at trial. They likely recorded those interviews with the parents and may show this at the trial. - Turning yourself in for a crime does not automatically prove guilt, but it is highly relevant. Especially when combined with multiple confessions, the suspected murder weapon hidden near the scene, DNA evidence, both parents identifying him, Robinson identifying himself as the person in the footage ("it was me... look at the surveillance footage. it was me." "Hey guys, I have bad news for you all. it was me at UVU yesterday."), his partner recognizing him and recounting his in-person confession, a written confession note, and Robinson surrendering. A confession alone is objectively strong evidence and he confessed multiple times to multiple people. - Show me the evidence that Robinson was told police were going to SWAT his house and endanger his family. I have never seen any evidence supporting that claim. - Citing an old Andrew Wilson clip without context is silly. Intelligent people operating in good-faith update their conclusions as more evidence becomes available.

KanekoaTheGreat

70,882 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Drama update for wowtwt: ever since being doxxed by Drohgoh a new challenger has appeared! I guess this is a TWITLONGER! 😂🤠🤡 Meet 𝕔𝕪𝕣𝕣𝕚 ♡ ...a mentally ill chronically online alcoholic 32 yr old grown woman (she pretends to be younger to get male attention) who wants to "ruin my life" because I yelled at her on stream while she was drunk saying stupid shit! Cyrri is a sociopathic fatherless attention seeking former "drug dealer" (so quirky loool) egirl who manipulates her ex boyfriend into paying her rent while shit talking him to eboys online. She claims to not be like the other girls! Lots of those around these days huh? Anyway, at first she was threatening me in twitch chat and then started slandering me to mutual friends and viewers lying about me anyway she could to try to get people on her side and farm sympathy by calling me a "creepy stalker pedo" (she copied drohgoh's slander) and then saying that i tried to "dox" her and threaten her. She then started "crying" while laughing on her stream saying that i was doing stuff to her, it was pornhub tier acting. She also threatened to release edited recordings of me to make me look bad...ok dont care bitch LOL. My wow guild was also getting doxxed and harassed (to fuck with me) and Cyrri was encouraging the doxxers because she knew it would get me gkicked since no guild wants to deal with that. She has no proof of anything because I never did anything so I dont give a fuck at all about her slander. The reason I'm making this post is because she crossed a line. A crazy line. Since Drohgoh leaked my information, a lot of malicious individuals have been threatening me and my family. My elderly mother has been harassed on the phone by Cyrri's associates. Cyrri is so mad that I hurt her ego on stream that she has gone to insane lengths to try to "ruin my life" including having her friends (simps) threaten to send my mother ILLEGAL PHOTOS (yes that kind) and say that I'm involved with that stuff. Maybe she'll try to SWAT me next? Who knows what this psychotic bitch will do! Cyrri and her internet terrorist associates want to fuck with me "until he kills himself or stops streaming" but I won't be doing either of those things. Fuck you Cyrri and fuck your simp ass cringe dark web internet terrorist simps. Stay mad you fatherless degenerate alcoholic🤣 DO NOT CARE LOL U WANNA THREATEN ME U WANNA FUCK WITH MY FAMLY? U WANNA SEND MY MOTHER ILLEGAL SHIT? U WANNA SEND THE SWAT TEAM TO MY HOUSE? SEND ME SOME DOORDASH TOO PLEASE! I WILL JUST SHIT TALK U AND UR CRAZY FRIENDS apple "apple" "luvapple" on discord (INTERNET TERRORIST SENDING ILLEGAL SHIT TO MY FAMILY) KEEP SIMPING FOR A BRAINDEAD EGIRL THAT WILL NEVER TOUCH YOU LIL BRO! KEEP PLAYING ROBLOX ALL DAY CHEATING IN CS HVH WHILE THREATENING TO FRAME PEOPLE FOR CP U FUCKING DEGENERATE CUCK! FBI I DONT GIVE A FUCK I AM GOING LIVE IN A BIT TO DEEP DIVE INTO THIS DRAMA MORE AHAHAHAHA IS THIS SCHIZO ENOUGH FOR YOU ALL? IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL A CRASH OUT? FUCK YOU here are some twitch chat logs and a short clip from the night of the drama after I yelled at her on stream, she doesnt care how she "paints" me... *trigger warning* slurs in clip 🤡
0:29

Drama update for wowtwt: ever since being doxxed by Drohgoh a new challenger has appeared! I guess this is a TWITLONGER! 😂🤠🤡 Meet 𝕔𝕪𝕣𝕣𝕚 ♡ ...a mentally ill chronically online alcoholic 32 yr old grown woman (she pretends to be younger to get male attention) who wants to "ruin my life" because I yelled at her on stream while she was drunk saying stupid shit! Cyrri is a sociopathic fatherless attention seeking former "drug dealer" (so quirky loool) egirl who manipulates her ex boyfriend into paying her rent while shit talking him to eboys online. She claims to not be like the other girls! Lots of those around these days huh? Anyway, at first she was threatening me in twitch chat and then started slandering me to mutual friends and viewers lying about me anyway she could to try to get people on her side and farm sympathy by calling me a "creepy stalker pedo" (she copied drohgoh's slander) and then saying that i tried to "dox" her and threaten her. She then started "crying" while laughing on her stream saying that i was doing stuff to her, it was pornhub tier acting. She also threatened to release edited recordings of me to make me look bad...ok dont care bitch LOL. My wow guild was also getting doxxed and harassed (to fuck with me) and Cyrri was encouraging the doxxers because she knew it would get me gkicked since no guild wants to deal with that. She has no proof of anything because I never did anything so I dont give a fuck at all about her slander. The reason I'm making this post is because she crossed a line. A crazy line. Since Drohgoh leaked my information, a lot of malicious individuals have been threatening me and my family. My elderly mother has been harassed on the phone by Cyrri's associates. Cyrri is so mad that I hurt her ego on stream that she has gone to insane lengths to try to "ruin my life" including having her friends (simps) threaten to send my mother ILLEGAL PHOTOS (yes that kind) and say that I'm involved with that stuff. Maybe she'll try to SWAT me next? Who knows what this psychotic bitch will do! Cyrri and her internet terrorist associates want to fuck with me "until he kills himself or stops streaming" but I won't be doing either of those things. Fuck you Cyrri and fuck your simp ass cringe dark web internet terrorist simps. Stay mad you fatherless degenerate alcoholic🤣 DO NOT CARE LOL U WANNA THREATEN ME U WANNA FUCK WITH MY FAMLY? U WANNA SEND MY MOTHER ILLEGAL SHIT? U WANNA SEND THE SWAT TEAM TO MY HOUSE? SEND ME SOME DOORDASH TOO PLEASE! I WILL JUST SHIT TALK U AND UR CRAZY FRIENDS apple "apple" "luvapple" on discord (INTERNET TERRORIST SENDING ILLEGAL SHIT TO MY FAMILY) KEEP SIMPING FOR A BRAINDEAD EGIRL THAT WILL NEVER TOUCH YOU LIL BRO! KEEP PLAYING ROBLOX ALL DAY CHEATING IN CS HVH WHILE THREATENING TO FRAME PEOPLE FOR CP U FUCKING DEGENERATE CUCK! FBI I DONT GIVE A FUCK I AM GOING LIVE IN A BIT TO DEEP DIVE INTO THIS DRAMA MORE AHAHAHAHA IS THIS SCHIZO ENOUGH FOR YOU ALL? IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL A CRASH OUT? FUCK YOU here are some twitch chat logs and a short clip from the night of the drama after I yelled at her on stream, she doesnt care how she "paints" me... *trigger warning* slurs in clip 🤡

Gromnak

73,323 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hey folks, after this post I’ll probably slow down a bit on the posts compiling “Commander” Brad Crawford’s abysmal behaviour, stolen valor, discrediting and denigrating the AFU and it’s service members, and pathological lying as I now know the right people are already paying close attention. A call had already been made to the Ukrainian authorities about Brad, and the authorities responded very quickly with a call back and a warning to cut ties with Brad Crawford and his entire circle immediately (take note, anyone considering associating with or seeking training from him). As we know, Brad employed, promoted, and gave valuable access to a Russian intelligence asset. So it’s understandable why authorities might be concerned. But in this post I’d like to touch on a topic we haven’t covered yet- Brad’s attitude toward and treatment of Ukrainian women and women in general- which I believe should be known publicly. This will be a bit of an info dump with videos and images. In one video a man tells the infamous 4th of July story about Brad’s actions at a bar. Brad, shitfaced as usual, got into an altercation with a Ukrainian woman whose father is a soldier. Brad became enraged when she wouldn’t help clean. As he saw it, he was in Ukraine defending her country and she ought to respect him for that, and to clean. She called him out for acting as a soldier when in reality he was simply a non-combatant trainer, and reminded him her own father was fighting. This enraged Brad even more. He attempted to physically attack her and had to be choked out by an MMA fighter who was luckily present and prevented Brad from physically harming the Ukrainian woman. Also below you will see Brad ridiculing female combat medics in Ukraine who actually serve on the front in the AFU- which Brad has never done himself- for their nails, jewellery, appearance, etc. You will also see Brad reiterating what he thinks of Ukrainian women: “I can get any pussy I want… Here it costs 20 dollars 20 year olds can get it on a phone call in 20 minuets? You think i want you for your pussy or body?” Even worse- the person he’s talking to is his own wife. He also insults her repeatedly. Unfortunately Brad’s mistreatment of his own wife doesn’t stop there. Also below you will find court records from when he was charged with domestic battery for physically beating his wife (thankfully he was finally held accountable for such a pattern of behaviour), and a felony criminal threat charge for threatening to shoot her as well. I wonder how SSO feels about a foreign civilian wife beater wearing their patch around as if he’s earned it? In the comment section I’m posting two audio recordings in subtitled video format from a Twitter space. Brad reportedly claimed that we all ought to show Russian soldiers the same level of respect we show Ukrainian soldiers, as the Russians are “fighting for their country”. A woman disagreed- and we all know Brad does not tolerate women disagreeing with him. He called her a bitch and questioned why anyone was listening to a “feminist bitch” who should “shut the fuck up”. He reverted to his default argument of being better than others as he’s in Ukraine and they’re not, even saying “do YOU wanna come here and fight?” (Again, Brad has never fought in Ukraine). I hope this is eye opening for some of you, and I hope it will help prevent any more Ukrainian women or women in general from being abused, disrespected, and mistreated by Brad Crawford. Again, Ukrainian authorities already know who Brad is and seem to be perfectly aware he’s a genuine threat in a variety of ways. I hope all this helps some of you see that now too, and assists you in avoiding people with whom NOBODY should ever want to be associated. Why he’s allowed anywhere near our defenders or training installations is beyond me. Our purpose is to help defend Ukraine and Ukrainians from violence, not to be that violence ourselves. Stay safe and be smart, folks. Glory to Ukraine.
4:22

Hey folks, after this post I’ll probably slow down a bit on the posts compiling “Commander” Brad Crawford’s abysmal behaviour, stolen valor, discrediting and denigrating the AFU and it’s service members, and pathological lying as I now know the right people are already paying close attention. A call had already been made to the Ukrainian authorities about Brad, and the authorities responded very quickly with a call back and a warning to cut ties with Brad Crawford and his entire circle immediately (take note, anyone considering associating with or seeking training from him). As we know, Brad employed, promoted, and gave valuable access to a Russian intelligence asset. So it’s understandable why authorities might be concerned. But in this post I’d like to touch on a topic we haven’t covered yet- Brad’s attitude toward and treatment of Ukrainian women and women in general- which I believe should be known publicly. This will be a bit of an info dump with videos and images. In one video a man tells the infamous 4th of July story about Brad’s actions at a bar. Brad, shitfaced as usual, got into an altercation with a Ukrainian woman whose father is a soldier. Brad became enraged when she wouldn’t help clean. As he saw it, he was in Ukraine defending her country and she ought to respect him for that, and to clean. She called him out for acting as a soldier when in reality he was simply a non-combatant trainer, and reminded him her own father was fighting. This enraged Brad even more. He attempted to physically attack her and had to be choked out by an MMA fighter who was luckily present and prevented Brad from physically harming the Ukrainian woman. Also below you will see Brad ridiculing female combat medics in Ukraine who actually serve on the front in the AFU- which Brad has never done himself- for their nails, jewellery, appearance, etc. You will also see Brad reiterating what he thinks of Ukrainian women: “I can get any pussy I want… Here it costs 20 dollars 20 year olds can get it on a phone call in 20 minuets? You think i want you for your pussy or body?” Even worse- the person he’s talking to is his own wife. He also insults her repeatedly. Unfortunately Brad’s mistreatment of his own wife doesn’t stop there. Also below you will find court records from when he was charged with domestic battery for physically beating his wife (thankfully he was finally held accountable for such a pattern of behaviour), and a felony criminal threat charge for threatening to shoot her as well. I wonder how SSO feels about a foreign civilian wife beater wearing their patch around as if he’s earned it? In the comment section I’m posting two audio recordings in subtitled video format from a Twitter space. Brad reportedly claimed that we all ought to show Russian soldiers the same level of respect we show Ukrainian soldiers, as the Russians are “fighting for their country”. A woman disagreed- and we all know Brad does not tolerate women disagreeing with him. He called her a bitch and questioned why anyone was listening to a “feminist bitch” who should “shut the fuck up”. He reverted to his default argument of being better than others as he’s in Ukraine and they’re not, even saying “do YOU wanna come here and fight?” (Again, Brad has never fought in Ukraine). I hope this is eye opening for some of you, and I hope it will help prevent any more Ukrainian women or women in general from being abused, disrespected, and mistreated by Brad Crawford. Again, Ukrainian authorities already know who Brad is and seem to be perfectly aware he’s a genuine threat in a variety of ways. I hope all this helps some of you see that now too, and assists you in avoiding people with whom NOBODY should ever want to be associated. Why he’s allowed anywhere near our defenders or training installations is beyond me. Our purpose is to help defend Ukraine and Ukrainians from violence, not to be that violence ourselves. Stay safe and be smart, folks. Glory to Ukraine.

floridasoldat ✙

13,124 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Dear Dr. Sagar Preet Hooda, IPS Director General of Police, Chandigarh DGP Chandigarh Police Subject: Request for intervention regarding FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh 1. I write this letter through X with the sincere hope that it reaches your attention. The present issue concerns FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh against Professor Madhu Kishwar Madhu Purnima Kishwar and a few others under Sections 66C, 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 196, 318, 336(1), 336(3), 336(4), 340, 353 and 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Satinder Singh, who alleged that a video clip was being circulated by various social media users with misleading claims that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was receiving a facial massage from a woman. According to the complaint, several social media accounts amplified this allegedly false narrative. As understood, the complainant further stated that his preliminary verification revealed that the video was originally posted by one Pardeep Kaur Dhillon through Facebook, YouTube and Instagram accounts on 12 April 2026, and that the person in the video was actually Jaspal Singh Sarai, who was apparently receiving a facial massage from a woman. However, even a plain reading of the complaint does not disclose the commission of any offence, much less a cognizable offence. Surprisingly, the police registered the FIR invoking an extraordinary range of provisions relating to identity theft, cheating, forgery, promoting enmity, defamation, public mischief, and even obscenity. 2. Let us briefly examine the applicability of each provision invoked in the FIR: (i) Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises fraudulent or dishonest use of another person’s electronic signature, password, or unique identification feature. The fundamental question is: whose identity has Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly stolen? Was it the identity of Satinder Singh? If not, what is his locus standi in lodging such a complaint? If the allegation concerns some other person, has that person complained? In the absence of any such complaint, how is an offence under this section made out? (ii) Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relates to cheating by personation through a communication device or computer resource. Whom did Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly impersonate? Who was deceived, and what wrongful gain or loss occurred? Did she impersonate Satinder Singh or any other person? If not, how does the complainant acquire locus standi under this provision? (iii) Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic form. The complainant himself states that the video was originally posted by Pardeep Kaur Dhillon and depicted Jaspal Singh Sarai receiving a facial massage from a woman. The video, by any objective standard, contains no obscene or lascivious material. Neither individuals were nude, nor was any sexual act depicted. It was merely a professional facial massage. Professor Madhu Kishwar merely reposted the content on X. Therefore, the essential ingredients of Section 67 are entirely absent. (iv) Section 196 of BNS concerns promoting enmity between groups on grounds such as religion, race, language, place of birth, or residence, and acts prejudicial to communal harmony. How does reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even assuming someone believed the man resembled Prime Minister Narendra Modi — amount to promoting enmity between groups or disturbing public harmony? The provision appears wholly inapplicable. (v) Section 318 of BNS deals with the offence of cheating. The essential ingredients of cheating require deception causing wrongful loss, delivery of property, or inducement to act or omit in a manner causing harm. How does reposting a social media video satisfy any of these ingredients? Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi felt personally aggrieved, the complaint would have to come from him or an authorised representative. What is the locus standi of Satinder Singh or any unrelated third party in this matter? (vi) Sections 336(1), 336(2) and 336(3) of BNS These provisions deal with forgery involving false documents or electronic records. How does reposting a pre-existing video amount to creating a false document or forged electronic record? No document was fabricated. No electronic record was forged. Again, even assuming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the aggrieved person, why has no complaint been filed either by him or by any authorised representative? How does Satinder Singh acquire standing in such circumstances? (vii) Section 340 of BNS concerns fraudulent or dishonest use of a forged document or electronic record. When there is no forged document at all, the provision itself cannot apply. Further, the alleged victim has neither filed nor authorised any complaint. In such circumstances, invocation of Section 340 appears entirely untenable. (viii) Section 353 of BNS concerns statements or reports intended to incite mutiny, offences against the State, public disorder, or inter-community violence. How can reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even if someone attributes resemblance to Prime Minister Narendra Modi — possibly amount to incitement of mutiny, public disorder, or offences against the State? The invocation of this section is wholly unsustainable. (ix) Section 356 of BNS concerns defamation. However, Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 clearly provides that defamation can be prosecuted only by the aggrieved person. If the aggrieved person is a public servant, proceedings can be initiated only by a Public Prosecutor with prior sanction of the Central or State Government as the case may be. Neither Satinder Singh nor any unrelated individual has the legal standing to initiate such proceedings. 3. Dr. Hooda Ji, permit me to share a version of a well-known satirical anecdote about policing, which bears a striking resemblance to the present case, where Professor Madhu Kishwar is being compelled to endure the ordeal of criminal prosecution despite the absence of the essential ingredients of the offences invoked against her. A man sees an old friend running down the street — terrified, panting, and sweating. He stops him and asks, “What is wrong? Why are you running?” The friend replies, “The police are arresting all bulls!” The man says, “But you are not a bull. Why are you running?” The friend shouts back, “We both know I am not a bull. But by the time I prove it to the police and the courts, I will have spent the rest of my life in jail!” Terrified by hearing this, the other man also starts running. 4. Dr. Hooda Ji, I have heard that you are a competent, upright and distinguished officer. It is the solemn responsibility of senior officers of the IPS to prevent abuse of the criminal justice process and to ensure that policing does not degenerate into a spectacle in which criminal law is stretched beyond recognition to harass individuals for expressing views that may inconvenience those in power. 5. I therefore request your kind intervention to prevent the continued harassment and persecution of Professor Madhu Kishwar for her views on public issues, and to direct immediate closure of the case. 6. This letter has also been converted into video format and attached.👇 With Regards
0:20

Dear Dr. Sagar Preet Hooda, IPS Director General of Police, Chandigarh DGP Chandigarh Police Subject: Request for intervention regarding FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh 1. I write this letter through X with the sincere hope that it reaches your attention. The present issue concerns FIR No. 44 dated 19-04-2026 registered by East Sector 26 Police Station, Chandigarh against Professor Madhu Kishwar Madhu Purnima Kishwar and a few others under Sections 66C, 66D and 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and Sections 196, 318, 336(1), 336(3), 336(4), 340, 353 and 356 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR was registered on the complaint of one Satinder Singh, who alleged that a video clip was being circulated by various social media users with misleading claims that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was receiving a facial massage from a woman. According to the complaint, several social media accounts amplified this allegedly false narrative. As understood, the complainant further stated that his preliminary verification revealed that the video was originally posted by one Pardeep Kaur Dhillon through Facebook, YouTube and Instagram accounts on 12 April 2026, and that the person in the video was actually Jaspal Singh Sarai, who was apparently receiving a facial massage from a woman. However, even a plain reading of the complaint does not disclose the commission of any offence, much less a cognizable offence. Surprisingly, the police registered the FIR invoking an extraordinary range of provisions relating to identity theft, cheating, forgery, promoting enmity, defamation, public mischief, and even obscenity. 2. Let us briefly examine the applicability of each provision invoked in the FIR: (i) Section 66C of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises fraudulent or dishonest use of another person’s electronic signature, password, or unique identification feature. The fundamental question is: whose identity has Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly stolen? Was it the identity of Satinder Singh? If not, what is his locus standi in lodging such a complaint? If the allegation concerns some other person, has that person complained? In the absence of any such complaint, how is an offence under this section made out? (ii) Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 relates to cheating by personation through a communication device or computer resource. Whom did Professor Madhu Kishwar allegedly impersonate? Who was deceived, and what wrongful gain or loss occurred? Did she impersonate Satinder Singh or any other person? If not, how does the complainant acquire locus standi under this provision? (iii) Section 67 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 criminalises publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic form. The complainant himself states that the video was originally posted by Pardeep Kaur Dhillon and depicted Jaspal Singh Sarai receiving a facial massage from a woman. The video, by any objective standard, contains no obscene or lascivious material. Neither individuals were nude, nor was any sexual act depicted. It was merely a professional facial massage. Professor Madhu Kishwar merely reposted the content on X. Therefore, the essential ingredients of Section 67 are entirely absent. (iv) Section 196 of BNS concerns promoting enmity between groups on grounds such as religion, race, language, place of birth, or residence, and acts prejudicial to communal harmony. How does reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even assuming someone believed the man resembled Prime Minister Narendra Modi — amount to promoting enmity between groups or disturbing public harmony? The provision appears wholly inapplicable. (v) Section 318 of BNS deals with the offence of cheating. The essential ingredients of cheating require deception causing wrongful loss, delivery of property, or inducement to act or omit in a manner causing harm. How does reposting a social media video satisfy any of these ingredients? Even assuming, for the sake of argument, that Prime Minister Narendra Modi felt personally aggrieved, the complaint would have to come from him or an authorised representative. What is the locus standi of Satinder Singh or any unrelated third party in this matter? (vi) Sections 336(1), 336(2) and 336(3) of BNS These provisions deal with forgery involving false documents or electronic records. How does reposting a pre-existing video amount to creating a false document or forged electronic record? No document was fabricated. No electronic record was forged. Again, even assuming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the aggrieved person, why has no complaint been filed either by him or by any authorised representative? How does Satinder Singh acquire standing in such circumstances? (vii) Section 340 of BNS concerns fraudulent or dishonest use of a forged document or electronic record. When there is no forged document at all, the provision itself cannot apply. Further, the alleged victim has neither filed nor authorised any complaint. In such circumstances, invocation of Section 340 appears entirely untenable. (viii) Section 353 of BNS concerns statements or reports intended to incite mutiny, offences against the State, public disorder, or inter-community violence. How can reposting a video of a man receiving a facial massage — even if someone attributes resemblance to Prime Minister Narendra Modi — possibly amount to incitement of mutiny, public disorder, or offences against the State? The invocation of this section is wholly unsustainable. (ix) Section 356 of BNS concerns defamation. However, Section 222 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 clearly provides that defamation can be prosecuted only by the aggrieved person. If the aggrieved person is a public servant, proceedings can be initiated only by a Public Prosecutor with prior sanction of the Central or State Government as the case may be. Neither Satinder Singh nor any unrelated individual has the legal standing to initiate such proceedings. 3. Dr. Hooda Ji, permit me to share a version of a well-known satirical anecdote about policing, which bears a striking resemblance to the present case, where Professor Madhu Kishwar is being compelled to endure the ordeal of criminal prosecution despite the absence of the essential ingredients of the offences invoked against her. A man sees an old friend running down the street — terrified, panting, and sweating. He stops him and asks, “What is wrong? Why are you running?” The friend replies, “The police are arresting all bulls!” The man says, “But you are not a bull. Why are you running?” The friend shouts back, “We both know I am not a bull. But by the time I prove it to the police and the courts, I will have spent the rest of my life in jail!” Terrified by hearing this, the other man also starts running. 4. Dr. Hooda Ji, I have heard that you are a competent, upright and distinguished officer. It is the solemn responsibility of senior officers of the IPS to prevent abuse of the criminal justice process and to ensure that policing does not degenerate into a spectacle in which criminal law is stretched beyond recognition to harass individuals for expressing views that may inconvenience those in power. 5. I therefore request your kind intervention to prevent the continued harassment and persecution of Professor Madhu Kishwar for her views on public issues, and to direct immediate closure of the case. 6. This letter has also been converted into video format and attached.👇 With Regards

M. Nageswara Rao IPS (Retired)

17,299 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🆘BREAKING: Washington County Claims ZERO Bodycam Footage Exist Of Tyler Robinson's Surrender—That Means EVERY Arresting Deputy BROKE Utah State Law on Sept 11th.🤯 The cover-up in Washington County just reached mathematically impossible levels of absurdity. If you thought the "missing" CCTV footage was a red flag, wait until you hear what they just admitted on the record in a state appeals hearing. We have the audio, and we are calling total B.S. In a recent GRAMA (public records) appeal hearing between Scripps News and Washington County, the media demanded the release of the bodycam footage showing Tyler Robinson walking into the Sheriff’s Office to surrender on the evening of September 11th. When the hearing director asked Washington County's representative, Mr. Snow, to address the bodycam request, his response was chilling: "There was a search made for body cam footage and there was none." The "Double Deletion" Coincidence: Let’s get this straight. First, Washington County tells the public that the CCTV surveillance video of Tyler walking into the lobby with his parents is magically "gone" and no longer available. Now, they are claiming on the legal record that not a single officer had their bodycam rolling when a high-profile suspect surrendered to their custody? That is IMPOSSIBLE Because It's ILLEGAL. Here is why their claim is a complete physical and legal impossibility. If there is genuinely "no footage," then every single officer involved in that intake committed a coordinated violation of both department protocol and state law. 1. Utah State Law: Under Utah Code § 77-7a-104 (Activation and use of body-worn cameras), subsection (4) explicitly mandates: "An officer shall activate the body-worn camera prior to ANY law enforcement encounter, or as soon as reasonably possible."Taking a suspect into custody is the textbook definition of a law enforcement encounter. Furthermore, subsection (10) states that if an officer fails to activate the camera, they must document the reason in a written report. 2. Washington County Sheriff’s Policy: Under their own internal Field Operations Policy Manual (Section 225.2), BWCs must be in active mode during encounters to ensure "accountability and transparency." Are we really supposed to believe that on the evening of September 11th, every single Washington County deputy involved in this massive arrest conveniently decided to break department policy AND Utah state law by consciously turning off their cameras before greeting Tyler Robinson and his family? Absolutely not. They are either lying to the appeals director about the existence of the video, or they are engaged in a coordinated, illegal cover-up to hide what happened at 6:00 PM. Why? Because the moment that footage is released, it proves Tyler was in custody and without his phone long before the fake "It was me" Discord confession was posted at 7:57 PM. They are terrified of the timeline. Demand the written reports. Demand the tape. 📼🛑 CC: Baron Coleman, Candace Owens
18:53

🆘BREAKING: Washington County Claims ZERO Bodycam Footage Exist Of Tyler Robinson's Surrender—That Means EVERY Arresting Deputy BROKE Utah State Law on Sept 11th.🤯 The cover-up in Washington County just reached mathematically impossible levels of absurdity. If you thought the "missing" CCTV footage was a red flag, wait until you hear what they just admitted on the record in a state appeals hearing. We have the audio, and we are calling total B.S. In a recent GRAMA (public records) appeal hearing between Scripps News and Washington County, the media demanded the release of the bodycam footage showing Tyler Robinson walking into the Sheriff’s Office to surrender on the evening of September 11th. When the hearing director asked Washington County's representative, Mr. Snow, to address the bodycam request, his response was chilling: "There was a search made for body cam footage and there was none." The "Double Deletion" Coincidence: Let’s get this straight. First, Washington County tells the public that the CCTV surveillance video of Tyler walking into the lobby with his parents is magically "gone" and no longer available. Now, they are claiming on the legal record that not a single officer had their bodycam rolling when a high-profile suspect surrendered to their custody? That is IMPOSSIBLE Because It's ILLEGAL. Here is why their claim is a complete physical and legal impossibility. If there is genuinely "no footage," then every single officer involved in that intake committed a coordinated violation of both department protocol and state law. 1. Utah State Law: Under Utah Code § 77-7a-104 (Activation and use of body-worn cameras), subsection (4) explicitly mandates: "An officer shall activate the body-worn camera prior to ANY law enforcement encounter, or as soon as reasonably possible."Taking a suspect into custody is the textbook definition of a law enforcement encounter. Furthermore, subsection (10) states that if an officer fails to activate the camera, they must document the reason in a written report. 2. Washington County Sheriff’s Policy: Under their own internal Field Operations Policy Manual (Section 225.2), BWCs must be in active mode during encounters to ensure "accountability and transparency." Are we really supposed to believe that on the evening of September 11th, every single Washington County deputy involved in this massive arrest conveniently decided to break department policy AND Utah state law by consciously turning off their cameras before greeting Tyler Robinson and his family? Absolutely not. They are either lying to the appeals director about the existence of the video, or they are engaged in a coordinated, illegal cover-up to hide what happened at 6:00 PM. Why? Because the moment that footage is released, it proves Tyler was in custody and without his phone long before the fake "It was me" Discord confession was posted at 7:57 PM. They are terrified of the timeline. Demand the written reports. Demand the tape. 📼🛑 CC: Baron Coleman, Candace Owens

Project Constitution

127,937 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

📢 BUSTED: Erika Kirk's Andrew Wilson might as well be the next Gary Meltdown, aka Paramount Not-So-Tactical, in the way that he is getting her in trouble!! 🤣 To start, the resolution on the photo that Andrew gave us is intentionally blurred to hide or skew the lines of editing. This is a SLOPPY amateurish tactic. 🔑 That's why when you turn this photo into NEGATIVE LIGHTING, you can see how messy this hack job really is! I'll give you one more bonus to prove this photo is 100% fake... BONUS: This photo would have been taken directly from Charlie's cell phone, and nowhere else. His messages are to the right, and the responses are from the left. This would be someone who has first-hand access to his phone. 🔑 The only person that would have been is Erika Kirk... 😱 By releasing this, Andrew Wilson is DIRECTLY implicating Erika Kirk in TAMPERING WITH AN ONGOING MURDER TRIAL, in which she has partial influence over!! 🔑 Do you understand how huge this is to prove this text message is actually fake, and BEING USED TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION AND ANY POTENTIAL JURY? This is what EVIL looks like... As Andrew Wilson goes through his humiliation ritual at the hands of TPUSA, just for the purposes of having "access", let's not lose focus on who actually runs TPUSA... 📰 Erika Kirk is DIRECTLY responsible for responding to this now... Either she directly gave these messages to Andrew herself, or she directly gave these messages to someone in TPUSA to give to Andrew herself. 🔑 Either way, Erika Kirk is responsible for these text messages, according to Andrew Wilson... There is NO OTHER WAY they could have been obtained through Charlie's personal cell phone. 📰 If Erika is NOT willing to claim responsibility, then she is going to have to tell us exactly who had access to Charlie Kirk's cell phone besides her. What are your thoughts? Is Erika Kirk influencing and tampering with an ongoing trial?! Or, is all of this just "normal"? My last thought... It's 2026, and almost every cell phone in the United States has a decent camera on it. They want us to believe that we keep getting blurry photos from their side because the cameras are not good... How long are we going to continue to fall for the same tactic? They want you to believe, that as millionaires, they don't have access to good cell phones with great cameras. They want you to believe that the cameras at UVU were worse than the cameras at Dairy Queen. And they don't even want you to think about the camera that was to the right of Charlie way up high on the side of the building; which could have coincidentally spotted the Birds of Prey drone that shot Charlie Kirk in the back of the head. I've been telling you about the Birds of Prey drone that assassinated Charlie Kirk since 2025, all in my five-part 8 hour series entitled Charlie Kirk; Operation 322. And recently I discovered the largest discovery of the Charlie Kirk assassination... 🔑 I discovered the infrared beam reflection on the back of Charlie Kirk's head at the time of his assassination, and the subsequent hole thereafter; leaving the neck as the EXIT. That creates a scientific impossibility for Tyler Robinson to have shot Charlie Kirk. Autopsy findings support my analysis. Physical evidence supports my analysis. 🔑 No one will debunk my analysis, but they simply won't tell you about it, regardless of how many viral videos I make... I am the most feared independent investigator of the Charlie Kirk assassination. They won't debate me. They never confront me. They won't engage with me intellectually. They won't even mention that they know I exist. They'll comment on my work if someone shares it in their comment section. 🔑 But they won't comment directly to me. So, I'll leave you with this... Do your research on EVERYTHING that these people say or present! Watch what they do and who they affiliate themselves with. They're definitely watching us. Watch them back... 🫡
0:34

Sensitive content

📢 BUSTED: Erika Kirk's Andrew Wilson might as well be the next Gary Meltdown, aka Paramount Not-So-Tactical, in the way that he is getting her in trouble!! 🤣 To start, the resolution on the photo that Andrew gave us is intentionally blurred to hide or skew the lines of editing. This is a SLOPPY amateurish tactic. 🔑 That's why when you turn this photo into NEGATIVE LIGHTING, you can see how messy this hack job really is! I'll give you one more bonus to prove this photo is 100% fake... BONUS: This photo would have been taken directly from Charlie's cell phone, and nowhere else. His messages are to the right, and the responses are from the left. This would be someone who has first-hand access to his phone. 🔑 The only person that would have been is Erika Kirk... 😱 By releasing this, Andrew Wilson is DIRECTLY implicating Erika Kirk in TAMPERING WITH AN ONGOING MURDER TRIAL, in which she has partial influence over!! 🔑 Do you understand how huge this is to prove this text message is actually fake, and BEING USED TO SWAY PUBLIC OPINION AND ANY POTENTIAL JURY? This is what EVIL looks like... As Andrew Wilson goes through his humiliation ritual at the hands of TPUSA, just for the purposes of having "access", let's not lose focus on who actually runs TPUSA... 📰 Erika Kirk is DIRECTLY responsible for responding to this now... Either she directly gave these messages to Andrew herself, or she directly gave these messages to someone in TPUSA to give to Andrew herself. 🔑 Either way, Erika Kirk is responsible for these text messages, according to Andrew Wilson... There is NO OTHER WAY they could have been obtained through Charlie's personal cell phone. 📰 If Erika is NOT willing to claim responsibility, then she is going to have to tell us exactly who had access to Charlie Kirk's cell phone besides her. What are your thoughts? Is Erika Kirk influencing and tampering with an ongoing trial?! Or, is all of this just "normal"? My last thought... It's 2026, and almost every cell phone in the United States has a decent camera on it. They want us to believe that we keep getting blurry photos from their side because the cameras are not good... How long are we going to continue to fall for the same tactic? They want you to believe, that as millionaires, they don't have access to good cell phones with great cameras. They want you to believe that the cameras at UVU were worse than the cameras at Dairy Queen. And they don't even want you to think about the camera that was to the right of Charlie way up high on the side of the building; which could have coincidentally spotted the Birds of Prey drone that shot Charlie Kirk in the back of the head. I've been telling you about the Birds of Prey drone that assassinated Charlie Kirk since 2025, all in my five-part 8 hour series entitled Charlie Kirk; Operation 322. And recently I discovered the largest discovery of the Charlie Kirk assassination... 🔑 I discovered the infrared beam reflection on the back of Charlie Kirk's head at the time of his assassination, and the subsequent hole thereafter; leaving the neck as the EXIT. That creates a scientific impossibility for Tyler Robinson to have shot Charlie Kirk. Autopsy findings support my analysis. Physical evidence supports my analysis. 🔑 No one will debunk my analysis, but they simply won't tell you about it, regardless of how many viral videos I make... I am the most feared independent investigator of the Charlie Kirk assassination. They won't debate me. They never confront me. They won't engage with me intellectually. They won't even mention that they know I exist. They'll comment on my work if someone shares it in their comment section. 🔑 But they won't comment directly to me. So, I'll leave you with this... Do your research on EVERYTHING that these people say or present! Watch what they do and who they affiliate themselves with. They're definitely watching us. Watch them back... 🫡

WeAreNotGoingToMars

89,812 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-
0:38

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-

Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo

28,735 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr