Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Cupsey says creator fees ruined memecoins by giving devs infinite upside “Basically what creator fees did is give devs completely zero risk and infinite upside. Traders are like, 'Why would I trade when I could just dev?'” “We're shifting to the wrong side: less traders, more devs. It's going... show more

Umar

1,626 subscribers

13,191 views • 22 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Meet The first platform where the house is on YOUR side. We were tired of these platforms extracting millions of dollars from traders so we flipped the script. We decided to airdrop 20% to Solana Traders & Hyperliquid communities. But not just that, we believe in Hyperliquids ethos of revenue going back to supporting our token, that's why 75% of our fees go right back into $TRADE buybacks Stop giving these big platforms more and more money. Join a platform that gives back to it's users. Welcome to -- Just trade and earn $TRADE Live now

Meet The first platform where the house is on YOUR side. We were tired of these platforms extracting millions of dollars from traders so we flipped the script. We decided to airdrop 20% to Solana Traders & Hyperliquid communities. But not just that, we believe in Hyperliquids ethos of revenue going back to supporting our token, that's why 75% of our fees go right back into $TRADE buybacks Stop giving these big platforms more and more money. Join a platform that gives back to it's users. Welcome to -- Just trade and earn $TRADE Live now

trade.fun

67,153 views • 1 year ago

Because Todd Howard is basically a celebrity game dev who is well respected, he unfortunately has a problem with "yes men" at times. His friend and former colleague Dennis Mejillones puts it well "A lot of people are afraid to say no to Todd and that hurt him." As more of the old guard at Bethesda retire, I imagine more of the devs will be less likely to give him pushback because of his superstar status. I do wonder if that is part of the reason he works at a higher level these days rather than being in the trenches with the devs.

Because Todd Howard is basically a celebrity game dev who is well respected, he unfortunately has a problem with "yes men" at times. His friend and former colleague Dennis Mejillones puts it well "A lot of people are afraid to say no to Todd and that hurt him." As more of the old guard at Bethesda retire, I imagine more of the devs will be less likely to give him pushback because of his superstar status. I do wonder if that is part of the reason he works at a higher level these days rather than being in the trenches with the devs.

Reece “Kiwi Talkz” Reilly

15,873 views • 5 months ago

what is wrong with new pairs these days, and why are we only getting $5 mill toppers in the trenches? ➡️ there are less whales aping new pairs ➡️ brand new traders aren’t being onboarded correctly ➡️ too many incentives for devs, not enough incentives for traders there is still money to be made and there are still runners, but I’m just giving my thoughts on why we went from having 50 mill runners almost every day to having coins barely breaking 5 mill

AshRobin 🐶

31,317 views • 10 months ago

Pump.fun extracts millions from traders every single day. 1% on every buy. 1% on every sell. Bonding curve fees. Migration fees. Multiply that by the volume and you're looking at a machine designed to bleed retail on both sides of every trade. You're not trading. You're paying rent. Infinity is the alternative. 0.00% protocol fee. 100% of fees to the creator and holders. No pairing, no migration, no graduation, no second venue. Deposit only your token, the SOL side starts virtual, and the pool is live instantly. Permanent liquidity. No LP tokens, no withdraw instruction. The creator owns a fee stream, not your exit. The rug surface doesn't exist here.

Pump.fun extracts millions from traders every single day. 1% on every buy. 1% on every sell. Bonding curve fees. Migration fees. Multiply that by the volume and you're looking at a machine designed to bleed retail on both sides of every trade. You're not trading. You're paying rent. Infinity is the alternative. 0.00% protocol fee. 100% of fees to the creator and holders. No pairing, no migration, no graduation, no second venue. Deposit only your token, the SOL side starts virtual, and the pool is live instantly. Permanent liquidity. No LP tokens, no withdraw instruction. The creator owns a fee stream, not your exit. The rug surface doesn't exist here.

Infinity Dex

18,986 views • 1 month ago

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

Herman Trading

22,826 views • 3 months ago

I want to fund infinite healthcare apps. AI that delivers more care and less paperwork. Companies like Counsel Health, and Tennr are leading the way. If you are building this future, I would love to chat.

I want to fund infinite healthcare apps. AI that delivers more care and less paperwork. Companies like Counsel Health, and Tennr are leading the way. If you are building this future, I would love to chat.

Jay Rughani

113,157 views • 4 months ago

Indie devs! It's #TrailerTuesday and I want to see what your indie games - You deserve way more eyes on your work - You're doing amazing, keep going - If you're having a bad day just remember I once walked into a lamppost Would you share your trailer below?

Indie devs! It's #TrailerTuesday and I want to see what your indie games - You deserve way more eyes on your work - You're doing amazing, keep going - If you're having a bad day just remember I once walked into a lamppost Would you share your trailer below?

Indie Game Joe

51,078 views • 3 months ago

I got to play #Empulse play test session and I have to tell you: YES, I want more of this! Thanks to Play Empulse for letting me take part 🥰 (Gameplay Provided by the Devs)

I got to play #Empulse play test session and I have to tell you: YES, I want more of this! Thanks to Play Empulse for letting me take part 🥰 (Gameplay Provided by the Devs)

BriX

90,131 views • 3 months ago

cupsey explained how most traders have moved to devving coins, and basically everyone is doing it now threadguy mentioned that he remembers when devving was frowned upon, which I remember too the change in pumpfun dev incentives made it very lucrative to deploy over trading

cupsey explained how most traders have moved to devving coins, and basically everyone is doing it now threadguy mentioned that he remembers when devving was frowned upon, which I remember too the change in pumpfun dev incentives made it very lucrative to deploy over trading

Ash Robin

163,930 views • 9 months ago

The FULL Cupsey & Jack Duval Interview 00:00:00 - Why Memecoins Fail to Onboard Retail 00:04:57 - Viral Memes No Longer Pump 00:09:49 - Are Memecoins Solved? 00:15:14 - Pumpfun Doesn’t Act Like a Billion Dollar Company 00:20:18 - No Competition in the Memecoin Industry 00:28:53 - Creator Fees, Dev Incentives, and the Death of Trading 00:35:09 - New Users Are Set Up to Lose 00:42:13 - Prediction Markets vs Memecoins 00:49:51 - No New Memecoin Flows 00:59:38 - Why Devving is Better than Trading

The FULL Cupsey & Jack Duval Interview 00:00:00 - Why Memecoins Fail to Onboard Retail 00:04:57 - Viral Memes No Longer Pump 00:09:49 - Are Memecoins Solved? 00:15:14 - Pumpfun Doesn’t Act Like a Billion Dollar Company 00:20:18 - No Competition in the Memecoin Industry 00:28:53 - Creator Fees, Dev Incentives, and the Death of Trading 00:35:09 - New Users Are Set Up to Lose 00:42:13 - Prediction Markets vs Memecoins 00:49:51 - No New Memecoin Flows 00:59:38 - Why Devving is Better than Trading

Counterparty

16,597 views • 9 months ago

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that *even if* a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Did Epstein influence Bitcoin core development? Short answer: No. This is not how Bitcoin works. Here’s what happened: Epstein donated to MIT Media Lab…who in turn supported MIT Digital Currency Initiative…which in turn funded Bitcoin developers. These devs used to be funded by The Bitcoin Foundation (which I used to run as volunteer Executive Director) there are many devs and no dev or team had power or control over Bitcoin. Under MIT’s patronage the devs had the same deal they had with us at The Bitcoin Foundation: that they could work on the code and not have direction from the org. More importantly — how Bitcoin works is that even if a dev was compromised then the nodes and miners would still have to run that code to make it included in Bitcoin. So for example if I had somehow asked the devs paid by Bitcoin Foundation to “add 1000 coins for Bruce” 1) they wouldn’t have done this / it would have been counter to our agreement 2) no miners would run that code & no nodes would recognize it. It would be a laughing stock and completely rejected. Does this mean code dev is not an attack vector? No. It’s still a risk. Particularly with nation state style actors and very careful efforts to co-opt which are much more sophisticated than “give Bruce coins” or something. This is one reason I’m cautious of Bitcoin core funding - especially from actors who’ve had bad judgment in the past. I think we should be cautious of who does the dev and view it as an attack vector. Bitcoin code is transparent and has lots of eyes on it. So in this case especially there isn’t even a solid accusation, let alone evidence that MIT directed nefarious code changes. If that was an allegation the first question should be: well what code specifically did MIT direct and what proof is there and how was it harmful? I think claims around this would collapse. There’s obviously plenty to criticize about Epstein and MIT working with him — and when it comes to digital assets MIT’s work with Gensler and especially its work on CBDCs is much more suspect than the chance that malicious code was pushed through on Bitcoin. Be cautious but this is a nothing burger

Bruce Fenton

232,025 views • 7 months ago

Most traders make trading too complicated. My mechanical approach is simple: -Wait for Intelligent Balance. -Identify the more probable side. -Trade ONLY in that direction. -Use iFVG as execution. Target fixed R. No setup toward the bias = no trade. Today’s New York session was a perfect example. Intelligent Balance showed 70% for SHORTS. That means I was NOT interested in longs. I did not need to predict every candle. I did not need to catch the top. I did not need to trade both directions. My job was simple: Wait for price to show bearish confirmation toward the more probable side. Once the iFVG appeared in the short direction, that became the mechanical entry. Bias came from Intelligent Balance. Execution came from iFVG. Risk handled the rest. This is why direction matters more than entry. A basic ICT concept becomes much easier when you already know which side you are allowed to trade. Would your trading improve if you stopped asking “long or short?” every 5 minutes and only traded toward the higher probability side?

Most traders make trading too complicated. My mechanical approach is simple: -Wait for Intelligent Balance. -Identify the more probable side. -Trade ONLY in that direction. -Use iFVG as execution. Target fixed R. No setup toward the bias = no trade. Today’s New York session was a perfect example. Intelligent Balance showed 70% for SHORTS. That means I was NOT interested in longs. I did not need to predict every candle. I did not need to catch the top. I did not need to trade both directions. My job was simple: Wait for price to show bearish confirmation toward the more probable side. Once the iFVG appeared in the short direction, that became the mechanical entry. Bias came from Intelligent Balance. Execution came from iFVG. Risk handled the rest. This is why direction matters more than entry. A basic ICT concept becomes much easier when you already know which side you are allowed to trade. Would your trading improve if you stopped asking “long or short?” every 5 minutes and only traded toward the higher probability side?

Herman Trading

34,617 views • 3 months ago

this guy lost more than $13,000 over the last few months trading memecoins so i reviewed his wallet to see what went wrong and here's what i found👇 i also made sure to give some tips on how he could improve his risk management when trading and ability to identify narratives

this guy lost more than $13,000 over the last few months trading memecoins so i reviewed his wallet to see what went wrong and here's what i found👇 i also made sure to give some tips on how he could improve his risk management when trading and ability to identify narratives

Jack Duval🌊

346,947 views • 4 months ago

Really enjoyed both Avatar and Tokon this weekend! Tokon I don't really get the complaining I see, I feel like we are playing 10% of the game by not abusing how broken active tag is + no training mode so seems too early to draw conclusions Avatar just remove the infinites and I think we are good 😂 after fighting devs I think game is more balanced than I initially thought

WBG | Diaphone

98,024 views • 9 months ago

PCA: “When I start feeling sexier and I start putting more balls in play, and I hit more balls in the air to the pull side, I end up swinging more. So inevitably, I am going to chase more… I’m just not going to walk that much, man.” 🤣🤣🤣

PCA: “When I start feeling sexier and I start putting more balls in play, and I hit more balls in the air to the pull side, I end up swinging more. So inevitably, I am going to chase more… I’m just not going to walk that much, man.” 🤣🤣🤣

Pete Crow-Armstrong Fan Club

112,737 views • 4 months ago

When you put the game and movie side by side like this, you can see why re-adapting it would feel redundant. Maybe a fresh take is the real risk worth taking. The real question is: are fans ready for something completely new?

When you put the game and movie side by side like this, you can see why re-adapting it would feel redundant. Maybe a fresh take is the real risk worth taking. The real question is: are fans ready for something completely new?

Janis

342,630 views • 4 months ago

.Chris Fallica says Indiana -8.5 over Miami is dumb 🗣️ "It feels like Indiana is the MASSIVE public side... I think the spread is stupid. It's like we're completely disregarding what Miami did to Ohio State."

.Chris Fallica says Indiana -8.5 over Miami is dumb 🗣️ "It feels like Indiana is the MASSIVE public side... I think the spread is stupid. It's like we're completely disregarding what Miami did to Ohio State."

Bear Bets

217,356 views • 8 months ago

Im onboarding the creator of Roaring kitty but the real name is Rambo kitten. after a long conversation with the creator, i decided to onboarded him because Many tokens Pump , the fees more than 300k+ and the creator got none. i dmed him in here, and he just activate his X too. after that, i dm'ed him on X and got his Wallet 4t7bajxixjD1HjdAvZWWEHHYDsooowSKfeyUvRii24Nq @DomziiD its real and he really deserve it, other people keep using his art without his concern is such a jerk. IM SENDING HIM ALL THE FEES

Im onboarding the creator of Roaring kitty but the real name is Rambo kitten. after a long conversation with the creator, i decided to onboarded him because Many tokens Pump , the fees more than 300k+ and the creator got none. i dmed him in here, and he just activate his X too. after that, i dm'ed him on X and got his Wallet 4t7bajxixjD1HjdAvZWWEHHYDsooowSKfeyUvRii24Nq @DomziiD its real and he really deserve it, other people keep using his art without his concern is such a jerk. IM SENDING HIM ALL THE FEES

Jack Meenie

10,954 views • 3 months ago