Curtis Jones Red Card Appeal Upheld?

Why are you offering an opinion on the sending off? It was reviewed by Var and then the ref who originally had given a yellow, after rewatching it he gave a red, unlike the offside, they checked everything in the correct sequence and reached the correct decision that it was a red

Mark Goldbridge these past few days

It was a red card mark always given intent or no intent

Mark try not to make it about United challenge: impossible

Before stepping on Bissouma, Curtis Jones touched the ball. There is no intention. Do not let sentimentality cloud your judgement; that can be a yellow card but never a straight red card. EPL officiating falls short of expectations. To the advantage of other teams, Liverpool ought to drag the FA. Fairness is necessary.

Casemiro was sent off for something not as bad as that

Red card. Well deserved.

Well i dont know how to feel about this but it was a dangerous tackle in my opinion

"he was in control of the ball"

Mark stop being so biased 😭😭😭

This is what VAR said regarding Skipps challenge on Diaz last season (an identical but worse challenge than the Jones challenge). VAR officials considered that Skipp 'clearly' got the ball and the final contact was just a consequence of the two players competing for the ball.

It doesn’t need to be intentional you moron. Jesus Christ.

It’s 100% a red you speccy tw*t. Hence why the appeal was unsuccessful

mark to Liverpool fans

Are you stupid or are you stupid? Why does everyone keep mentioning intent? You don't have to intentionally try and break someone leg for a tackle to be a leg breaker. It's a dangerous foul whether he menat it or not. Red card, simple as that.

You’re making up the rules again fella

1. He absolutely did not control the ball 2. It was reckless and high with his studs up (that’s how physics works) 3. Intent has nothing to do with the law

Imagine liking the sound of your own voice enough to make a living out it when it sounds like that... 🎧

How you get paid to comment on football is a bigger shock than the var decision from sat

Liverpool is having a hard time with FA this week

80 yards from own goal he has to make breaking leg tackle. Are you mad? What a load of rubbish. He can press the ball and force mistake but he doesn't have to do any ridiculous tackle like that. Pathetic biased!

terrible decision

Well obviously yes it is a red all day long. Law 12 “serious foul play” is a red and “endangering an opponent” constitutes serious foul play I cannot believe this is getting so much coverage it is a blatant red as per the laws of the game

People are getting confused by intent and reality. He never intended to hurt or go in on him but he could of snapped his leg and ended his season. If he did break his leg would this conversation be happening? No it wouldn’t

Reckless. Studs on shin. Endangered an opponent. Clear Red. Sit down.

"Curtis Jones controls the ball" At no point was he in control

Damn Mark is actually so fucking Goated for everything he has done since the game🔥

Rightly upheld.

Intent means absolute fuck all I'm afraid. Dangerous tackle whether he meant it or not, red card.

You are relentless in your pursuit to tarnish anything positive about Spurs this season, old man. He endangered Bissouma the moment he lost control of his own challenge; unfortunate? Definitely. Dangerous? Absolutely.

How many times will you try to milk the scousers ?

When did intent matter? Players don’t intentionally hurt players or handball 99% of the time but if it’s putting a player at danger then it’s a red. Unfortunate yes but intent has zero relevance.