Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Cybersecurity experts at Allied Security Operations, based it Dallas, Texas, stated that they can prove that one of the nation's largest providers of election software, a system used in 28 states, not only uses servers in Germany, but is also possibly infected with malware embedded in the software of...

26,165 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

19,397 views • 21 days ago

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 views • 7 months ago

A whistleblower who works as a counterterrorism analyst for the U.S. Army, that the DEA, DOJ, Homeland Security, and the FBI allegedly confirmed, named Scott Bennett, claimed on record that BIDEN visited SERBIA in May of 2009 to personally recruit computer hackers to control Dominion election equipment in U.S. elections. Tabulators and other election equipment from ES&S, DOMINION, and SMARTMATIC were examined and found to have internet access devices in order to be controlled from anywhere in the world. The also found a serial port in the back of the machines in which a device can be inserted in seconds to give root access with NO PASSWORD to the entire machine which would allow them to rewrite the code in the machine to have it do whatever it would be programmed to do. There are a massive amount of variables that can be changed to manipulate the outcome of an election, how the tabulators read ballots, flips votes, or cause hundreds of thousands, even millions of votes to enter adjudication, which was a main method of voter fraud. This is a massive security flaw that was well known which can be accessed in under a min to completely take over elections. The truth is that these really aren't security flaws. These are techniques and methods incorporated into the hardware and software which enable multiple methods and techniques to manipulate the outcome to your choice and to what you can get away with. These machine were designed to literally steal elections.

The SCIF

43,792 views • 6 months ago

Speaker Johnson uses logic and facts to battle CNN's Manu Raju, who claims Republicans only want election integrity because they "lost" in the California mayoral race: Raju: "The President keeps saying that there's election fraud in the California mayoral's race. Is what evidence is there to prove that?" Johnson: "You tell me, Manu. They are counting votes WEEKS after the election. We have entire nation's with huge populations—like India—that can count their votes in 24-48 hours." Raju: "So you're saying it's rigged, like the President?" Johnson: "I'm not saying it's rigged; I'm saying it stinks to high Heaven, and everybody knows that. Let's remove the appearance of impropriety...Let's have votes on an election the day of the election...I think California is playing around with us." Raju: "But what evidence is there to prove theirs is rigged?" Johnson: "Some of these efforts are so diabolical and so far upstream it is impossible to prove. But I think everybody knows instinctively something is wrong here, and that's a concern. We need people to believe in the integrity of our election system; it is critical to maintain a constitutional republic. We're going to keep working to pass the SAVE America Act...and 70% of Democrats understand that's necessary. We have to have free and fair elections-" Raju: "Aren't you all just saying that because you've lost the election, because the Republicans did not win in this, this is why you're hearing that?" Johnson: "I'm saying that every leader of all parties should demand election integrity, and if somebody is opposing that, you should look at their motives." How does this even remotely constitute journalism, CNN? Raju repeatedly interrupted Speaker Johnson and tried to put words in his mouth, then made it very clear he's biased against Republicans with his reporting. 🤡

Julia 🇺🇸

162,218 views • 1 month ago