Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Cybersecurity is so hard, that they are literally making a documentary about how horrible the job of a CISO is. Then we set SDRs and AEs to "go high within the organization" in order to shill products that don't work. And people wonder why cybersec quota attainment is low.

35,940 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

The Deal Director's profile picture
The Deal Director1 year ago

Time to sell AI folks:

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple's profile picture
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 year ago

🎓 Preparing for certifications like Security+, CISSP, CEH, or CISM? Why Just Pass When You Can Master Cybersecurity?💡 Our 50 study tips + Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone make you exam-ready & industry-prepared! 🔑 Available on Amazon:

Mike Simmons #leadership's profile picture
Mike Simmons #leadership1 year ago

Let’s create more noise. That always works. 😅 This is an awesome space to work in. Challenge is that vendors still focus on self rather than the customer. Imagine if they too some of the behavioral science stuff, and applied it to outreach in context. 🤔

Full Degen's profile picture
Full Degen1 year ago

So you don’t recommend to do sales in cybersec?

The Deal Director's profile picture
The Deal Director1 year ago

I recommend to join a company with a strong platform play. I've written a lot of articles around cybersec you can read, but this intro to Palo Alto explains the core thesis:

Lee Corning's profile picture
Lee Corning1 year ago

truth. learned by experience.

The Deal Director's profile picture
The Deal Director1 year ago

burned* by experience

Beachside Closer's profile picture
Beachside Closer1 year ago

It’s not for the weak

Mwesh's profile picture
Mwesh1 year ago

I am sat 🍿

Mr. Pink's profile picture
Mr. Pink1 year ago

Trying to figure out if this is real or satire...😂 😂 😂

Related Videos

Shuler: If you think about every industrial revolution we’ve been through, working people have helped us make that transition. It’s really because we’ve helped tame the technology and figured out how to use it in the most effective way. So I think your question about augmentation versus replacement is the big question we have. If we can all agree that this is about making our jobs better, safer, easier, and more productive, then we’re all in. But if you’re looking to de-skill, dehumanize, and replace workers, to put people out on the street with no path forward, then absolutely you’re going to have a revolution. So I think that’s something we all need to be very real about and think seriously about. If we’re going to have productivity gains, working people—the ones who make these industries happen—need to share in that. There hasn’t been a lot of discussion about that here. Of course, in terms of how we create policies, how we create tax infrastructure, whether or not we are redistributing—yes, that word is a dirty word around here—we need to talk about it and confront how we’re going to make sure working people share in the gains of these technologies. And if you look at the numbers of jobs, let’s talk about job quality. Yes, maybe there are a lot of jobs created, but what kind of jobs are we talking about? Are they jobs that can sustain a family? Is it a job where people can actually work one job? One job should be enough.

Acyn

41,942 views • 5 months ago